DOCSLIB.ORG

28 Aug 2009 COTCE BNRT Workshop UCLA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
28 Aug 2009 COTCE BNRT Workshop UCLA STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY STATE OF CALIFORNIA REVENUE & TAXATION Commission BNRT Workshop Friday, August 28, 2009 9:00 a.m. – 1:20 p.m. University of California, Los Angeles De Neve Plaza, Plaza Room De Neve Commons 351 Charles E. Young Drive, West Los Angeles, California Reported by: Daniel P. Feldhaus Certified Shorthand Reporter #6949 Registered Diplomate Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter Daniel P. Feldhaus, C.S.R., Inc. Certified Shorthand Reporters 8414 Yermo Way, Sacramento, California 95828 Telephone 916.682.9482 Fax 916.688.0723 [email protected] 1 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21 ST CENTURY ECONOMY GERRY PARSKY Commission Chair Aurora Capital Group RUBEN BARRALES President/CEO San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce JOHN COGAN Professor Stanford University CHRISTOPHER EDLEY, JR. Dean/Professor of Law Boalt Hall School of Law JENNIFER ITO Research, Training, Policy Director SCOPE CURT PRINGLE Mayor City of Anaheim ---o0o--- BNRT Workshop Panel JUNE SUMMERS HAAS Partner Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP CARL JOSEPH Director Multistate Taxation Bureau Legal Division Franchise Tax Board DOUG POWERS Franchise Tax Board --o0o-- Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 2 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COTCE Staff Present MARK IBELE Commission Staff Director Board of Equalization ASHLEY SNEE GIOVANNETTONE ANTONIO LOCKETT PHIL SPILBERG Chief, Financial Research Department of Finance MARGIE RAMIREZ WALKER --oOo-- Presenters JIM BARNETT Vice President, Tax Edison International HATEF BEHNIA Tax Partner Gibson Dunn & Crutcher DAVID CHASE Governor’s Office JIM EUPHRAT Tax Manager General Dynamics/National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. RUSSELL GOLDSMITH Chairman/CEO City National Bank MARTY KELLER Director Office of Small Business Advocate Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 3 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S Presenters Continued GREG LIPPE Managing Partner Lippe, Hellie, Hoffer & Allison LLP ERIC MIETHKE Motion Picture Association of America MIKE ROCKENBACH Chief Financial Officer Emulex --oOo-- Public Testimony MICHAEL D. SHAW Legislator Director National Federation of Independent Business WILLIAM SPILLANE Americans for Fair Taxation CHRISS STREET Treasurer-Tax Collector County of Orange ---o0o--- Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 4 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 Table of Contents Item Page Welcome and Introductions Chair Parsky .............................. 7 Banking/Finance: Russell Goldsmith Chairman/CEO City National Bank ......................... 12 Technology: Mike Rockenbach Chief Financial Officer Emulex ..................................... 59 Entertainment Eric Miethke Motion Picture Association of America ...... 78 Ports/Shipping Jim Euphrat Tax Manager General Dynamics/National Steel and Shipbuilding Company ....................... 98 Energy Jeff Barnett Vice President, Tax Edison International ....................... 114 Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 5 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 Table of Contents Item Page Small Business/Professional Services Marty Keller Director Office of Small Business Advocate ......... 129 Greg Lippe Managing Partner Lippe, Hellie, Hoffer & Allison LLP ....... 134 Hatef Behnia Tax Partner Gibson Dunn & Crutcher .................... 136 Public Comment Chriss Street Treasurer-Tax Collector County of Orange .......................... 170 Michael D. Shaw Legislator Director National Federation of Independent Business ................................. 177 William Spillane Americans for Fair Taxation ............... 180 Adjournment .................................... 185 Reporter’s Certificate ......................... 186 --o0o-- Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 6 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 1 BE IT REMEMBERED that on Friday, August 28, 2 2009, commencing at the hour of 9:08 a.m., at University 3 of California, Los Angeles - Covel Commons, 330 De Neve 4 Drive, Los Angeles, California, before me, DANIEL P. 5 FELDHAUS, CSR 6949, RDR, CRR, in the state of California, 6 the following proceedings were held: 7 --o0o-- 8 CHAIR PARSKY: This forum is certainly 9 recognizable for me given my involvement with University 10 of California. I want to thank everyone for participating 11 in this public workshop. 12 Just a few comments by way of introduction. 13 As part of the process of the Commission established by 14 Governor Schwarzenegger and Karen Bass and Darrell 15 Steinberg, we have been considering a package of possible 16 recommendations. At the last Commission meeting, we put 17 forward an approach that we would take with respect to 18 the recommendations we would make, divided up, really, 19 into three sections that the report and recommendations 20 will be structured around. 21 The first section will contain tax-law changes, 22 revenue-related, that the Legislature can act on as their 23 process unfolds, but that they can act on. 24 The second section would be tax-law changes, 25 revenue-related. That may require an amendment or change Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 7 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 1 to the State Constitution, or that might involve a voter 2 initiative. 3 And the third section will be recommendations 4 that commissioners will make that are for others to 5 consider, areas of reform that may be revenue-related 6 and may not be revenue-related, but that they’re areas 7 of reform that could – that, from the Commission’s 8 standpoint, others should consider. 9 That structure was agreed to by the Commission. 10 It’s been posted on our Web site, and it will serve as 11 the framework for the recommendations that we will make 12 under our deadline of September 20 th . 13 We plan to have another full commission meeting 14 on September 10 th , here at UCLA, and then, if necessary, 15 also on September 14 th of the Commission. 16 And then we also put forward a package that 17 all the commissioners wanted to still be part of the 18 consideration. And there were a number of items on that 19 package: Changes in the personal income tax, changes in 20 the corporate income tax, changes in the state sales and 21 use tax, and the possible establishment of a business 22 net-receipts tax. 23 In addition to that, there was the proposal for 24 a possible pollution tax on fuels, a split-roll property 25 tax, a severance or royalty on expanded oil drilling, a Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 8 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 1 rainy-day or reserve fund, and the possibility of 2 recommending a forum or establishing a forum for settling 3 tax disputes in California. 4 That package of recommendations, or that 5 package, will serve as the basis for the ultimate 6 recommendations. It could be that some items on that list 7 wouldn’t be supported by enough commissioners and, 8 therefore, would become part of Section 3, which, as I 9 indicated, would be recommendations for others to consider 10 as part of reform. And they could be parts of Sections 1 11 or 2. 12 Anything outside of that package could still be 13 part of Section 3 but would not be part of Sections 1 or 14 2. That’s the structure. 15 Now, we’ve been looking extensively at a major 16 change in the tax system around a new form of tax, and 17 that’s the business net-receipts tax. And the Commission 18 felt that because of the magnitude of this potential tax, 19 the fact that it would be new to California, that more 20 work really needed to be done by the Commission to 21 understand the impact of such a tax on various taxpayers, 22 parts of our community. And, therefore, it was 23 recommended that we hold public workshops just around 24 that tax. And I was able to get the voluntary 25 contributions of John Cogan and Chris Edley, two Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 9 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 1 commissioners to help conduct these workshops. 2 We have sought the expertise of the Franchise 3 Tax Board, of the Legislative Counsel’s office, of the 4 Legislative Analyst’s Office; and we also have, working 5 with us, representatives from Ernst & Young that have done 6 a lot of work in state taxation. And June Haas, who is 7 here with us, who is a private practicing lawyer, but was 8 very involved as commissioner in the state of Michigan, 9 and very familiar with the approach taken by Michigan to 10 a similar, although not exactly the same, form of tax. 11 We also have two commissioners here -- all 12 commissioners are welcome -- Curt Pringle and Ruben 13 Barrales -- to listen to this give-and-take impact of 14 this tax. 15 These workshops are only oriented around this 16 business net-receipts tax. However, I think it is very 17 important that the community, as a whole, step back and 18 understand the relationship between the changes that 19 might be made in the other taxes and their impact on 20 business, individuals, others in California. Because it 21 is a package, and will be seen as a package. But the 22 purpose here is for us to understand the reactions of 23 people, to have an open give-and-take about it. 24 We would all urge that the people that would 25 be presenting to us here, as the people that presented to Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 10 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – August 28, 2009 1 us two days ago in San Francisco, orient their comments 2 around this tax.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tearing out the Income Tax by the (Grass)Roots
    FLORIDA TAX REVIEW Volume 15 2014 Number 8 TEARING OUT THE INCOME TAX BY THE (GRASS)ROOTS by Lawrence Zelenak* Rich People’s Movements: Grassroots Campaigns to Untax the One Percent. By Isaac William Martin New York: Oxford University Press. 2013. I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 649 II. A CENTURY OF RICH PEOPLE’S ANTI-TAX MOVEMENTS ......... 651 III. EXPLAINING THE SUPPORT OF THE NON-RICH .......................... 656 IV. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FLAT TAX AND THE FAIRTAX? ............ 661 V. THE RHETORIC OF RICH PEOPLE’S ANTI-TAX MOVEMENTS: PARANOID AND NON-PARANOID STYLES .................................... 665 VI. CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 672 I. INTRODUCTION Why do rich people seeking reductions in their tax burdens, who have the ability to influence Congress directly through lobbying and campaign contributions, sometimes resort to grassroots populist methods? And why do non-rich people sometimes join the rich in their anti-tax movements? These are the puzzles Isaac William Martin sets out to solve in Rich People’s Movements.1 Martin’s historical research—much of it based on original sources to which scholars have previously paid little or no attention—reveals that, far from being a recent innovation, populist-style movements against progressive federal taxation go back nearly a century, to the 1920s. Although Martin identifies various anti-tax movements throughout the past century, he strikingly concludes that there has been “substantial continuity from one campaign to the next, so that, in some * Pamela B. Gann Professor of Law, Duke Law School. 1. ISAAC WILLIAM MARTIN, RICH PEOPLE’S MOVEMENTS: GRASSROOTS CAMPAIGNS TO UNTAX THE ONE PERCENT (2013) [hereinafter MARTIN, RICH PEOPLE’S MOVEMENTS].
    [Show full text]
  • February 12, 2009 Meeting Transcript
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE 21st CENTURY ECONOMY YZ REVENUE AND TAXATION STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES XW PUBLIC MEETING Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:06 a.m. – 5:03 p.m. University of California, Los Angeles De Neve Plaza, Plaza Room De Neve Commons 351 Charles E. Young Drive, West Los Angeles, California XW Reported by: Daniel P. Feldhaus Certified Shorthand Reporter #6949 Registered Diplomate Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter Daniel P. Feldhaus, C.S.R., Inc. Certified Shorthand Reporters 8414 Yermo Way, Sacramento, California 95828 Telephone 916.682.9482 Fax 916.688.0723 [email protected] 1 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – February 12, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present GERRY PARSKY Commission Chair Aurora Capital Group RUBEN BARRALES President/CEO San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce MICHAEL BOSKIN Professor Stanford University EDWARD DE LA ROSA Founder and President Edward J. De La Rosa & Company, Inc. CHRISTOPHER EDLEY, JR. Dean/Professor of Law Boalt Hall School of Law GEORGE HALVORSON Chairman/CEO Kaiser Foundation WILLIAM HAUCK Trustee, California State University Director Blue Shield of California & Blue Shield Foundation JENNIFER ITO Research, Training, Policy Director SCOPE FRED KEELEY Treasurer, County of Santa Cruz Professor, San José State University MONICA LOZANO Publisher/CEO La Opinión Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 2 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – February 12, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present continued REBECCA MORGAN President Morgan Family Foundation RICHARD POMP Alva P.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Tax Reform: Flat-Tax Simplicity with a Progressive Twist Donald Marron
    Real Tax Reform: Flat-Tax Simplicity with a Progressive Twist Donald Marron Abstract In a contribution to the Christian Science Monitor, Donald Document date: November 28, 2011 Marron agrees that there are good reasons for a simpler tax Released online: November 25, 2011 system, as found in the flat-tax plans of GOP hopefuls Perry, Gingrich, and Cain. But they need to be made more progressive to amount to real tax reform that can pass muster politically. Christian Science Monitor, The New Economy: Real Tax Reform: Flat-Tax Simplicity with a Progressive Twist Tax reform has emerged as a key issue for GOP presidential hopefuls. Texas Gov. Rick Perry wants to scrap our current system and replace it with a 20 percent flat tax on individual and corporate incomes. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich wants to do the same, but with even lower rates. Then there's pizza magnate Herman Cain. His "9-9-9" plan would replace today's income and payroll taxes with a trio of levies: a 9 percent flat tax on individuals, another on businesses, and a 9 percent retail sales tax. But Mr. Cain's ultimate vision is to eliminate anything remotely resembling today's tax system in favor of a national retail sales tax, which proponents call the FairTax. These three plans have much in common. Catchy names, for one. More important, they all focus on taxing consumption - what people spend - rather than income. The flat tax is most famous, of course, for applying a single rate to all corporate earnings and to all individual earnings above some exemption.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viability of the Fair Tax
    The Fair Tax 1 Running head: THE FAIR TAX The Viability of The Fair Tax Jonathan Clark A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Fall 2008 The Fair Tax 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Gene Sullivan, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Donald Fowler, Th.D. Committee Member ______________________________ JoAnn Gilmore, M.B.A. Committee Member ______________________________ James Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date The Fair Tax 3 Abstract This thesis begins by investigating the current system of federal taxation in the United States and examining the flaws within the system. It will then deal with a proposal put forth to reform the current tax system, namely the Fair Tax. The Fair Tax will be examined in great depth and all aspects of it will be explained. The objective of this paper is to determine if the Fair Tax is a viable solution for fundamental tax reform in America. Both advantages and disadvantages of the Fair Tax will objectively be pointed out and an educated opinion will be given regarding its feasibility. The Fair Tax 4 The Viability of the Fair Tax In 1986 the United States federal tax code was changed dramatically in hopes of simplifying the previous tax code. Since that time the code has undergone various changes that now leave Americans with over 60,000 pages of tax code, rules, and rulings that even the most adept tax professionals do not understand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fairtax Treatment of Housing
    A FairTaxsm White Paper The FairTax treatment of housing Advocates of tax reform share a common motivation: To iron out the mangled economic incentives resulting from statutory inequities and misguided social engineering that perversely cripple the American economy and the American people. Most importantly, ironing out the statutory inequities of the federal tax code need not harm homebuyers and homebuilders. The FairTax does more than do no harm. The FairTax encourages home ownership and homebuilding by placing all Americans and all businesses on equal footing – no loopholes, no exceptions. A specific analysis of the impact of the FairTax on the homebuilding industry/the housing market shows that the new homebuilding market would greatly benefit from enactment of the FairTax. The analysis necessarily centers upon two issues: (1) Whether the FairTax’s elimination of the home mortgage interest deduction (MID) adversely impacts the housing market (new and existing) in general, and home ownership and the homebuilding industry specifically; and (2) Whether the FairTax’s superficially disparate treatment of new vs. existing housing has an adverse impact on the market for new homes and homebuilding. The response to both of the above questions is no. Visceral opposition to the repeal of a “good loophole” such as the MID is understandable, absent a more thorough and empirical analysis of the impact of the FairTax vs. the MID on home ownership and the homebuilding industry. Such an analysis demonstrates that preserving the MID is the classic instance of a situation where the business community confuses support for particular businesses with support for enterprise in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Average and Marginal Tax Rates Under the Fairtax and the Current System of Federal Taxation
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COMPARING AVERAGE AND MARGINAL TAX RATES UNDER THE FAIRTAX AND THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF FEDERAL TAXATION Laurence J. Kotlikoff David Rapson Working Paper 11831 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11831 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2005 © 2005 by Laurence J. Kotlikoff and David Rapson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Comparing Average and Marginal Tax Rates Under the FairTax and the Current System of Federal Taxation Laurence J. Kotlikoff and David Rapson NBER Working Paper No. 11831 December 2005, Revised November 2006 JEL No. H2 ABSTRACT This paper compares marginal and average tax rates on working and saving under our current federal tax system with those that would arise under a federal retail sales tax, specifically the FairTax. The FairTax would replace the personal income, corporate income, payroll, and estate and gift taxes with a 23 percent effective retail sales tax plus a progressive rebate. The 23 percent rate generates more revenue than the taxes it replaces, but the rebate's cost necessitates scaling back non-Social Security expenditures to their 2000 share of GDP. The FairTax's effective marginal tax on labor supply is 23 percent. Its effective marginal tax on saving is zero. In contrast, for the stylized working households considered here, current effective marginal labor taxes are higher or much higher than 23 percent. Take our stylized 45 year-old, married couple earning $35,000 per year with two children.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Federalism-The National Fairtax and the States-BHI 10-25-07
    Fiscal Federalism: The National FairTax and the States David G. Tuerck, Ph.D. Paul Bachman, MSIE Sylvia Jacob, MSIE The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108 Web: www.beaconhill.org phone: 617-573-8750 Fax: 617-994-4279 e-mail: [email protected] September 2007 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 3 I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 II. Measuring State-Level FairTax Rates ........................................................................... 8 A. Tax-inclusive versus Tax-exclusive Rates ................................................................ 9 B. Determining the FairTax Rate ................................................................................... 9 III. The Economic Effects of Federal and State FairTaxes on Select State Economies... 19 IV. Logistical and Practical Implications Associated with Combining a National FairTax with State and Local Taxes ........................................................................................ 23 A. The Current State Tax Structure.............................................................................. 23 B. State Piggybacking of the Federal System .............................................................. 25 C. Federal Taxes (National Sales Taxes) Would Not Be Deductible from State Taxes.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of CALIFORNIA COMMISSION on the 21 CENTURY ECONOMY PUBLIC MEETING Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:00 P.M. – 4:55 P.M. Daniel
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY STATE OF CALIFORNIA REVENUE & TAXATION FUNDAMENTAL TAX ALTERNATIVES Part Three PUBLIC MEETING Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:00 p.m. – 4:55 p.m. University of California, San Francisco Mission Bay Conference Center William J. Rutter Community Center Fisher Banquet Room 1675 Owens Street San Francisco, California Reported by: Daniel P. Feldhaus Certified Shorthand Reporter #6949 Registered Diplomate Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter Daniel P. Feldhaus, C.S.R., Inc. Certified Shorthand Reporters 8414 Yermo Way, Sacramento, California 95828 Telephone 916.682.9482 Fax 916.688.0723 [email protected] 1 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – July 16, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21 ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present GERRY PARSKY Commission Chair Aurora Capital Group RUBEN BARRALES President/CEO San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce MICHAEL BOSKIN Professor Stanford University JOHN COGAN Professor Stanford University EDWARD DE LA ROSA Founder and President Edward J. De La Rosa & Company, Inc. CHRISTOPHER EDLEY, JR. Dean/Professor of Law Boalt Hall School of Law GEORGE HALVORSON Chairman/CEO Kaiser Foundation WILLIAM HAUCK Trustee, California State University Director Blue Shield of California & Blue Shield Foundation JENNIFER ITO Research, Training, Policy Director SCOPE FRED KEELEY Treasurer, County of Santa Cruz Professor, San José State University Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 2 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – July 16, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21 ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present continued MONICA LOZANO Publisher/CEO La Opinión REBECCA MORGAN President Morgan Family Foundation RICHARD POMP Alva P.
    [Show full text]
  • How Proposed Legislation Could Affect Corporate Taxes Kaitlin Aspinwall University of Mississippi
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) 2016 How Proposed Legislation Could Affect Corporate Taxes Kaitlin Aspinwall University of Mississippi. Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Accounting Commons Recommended Citation Aspinwall, Kaitlin, "How Proposed Legislation Could Affect Corporate Taxes" (2016). Honors Theses. 495. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/495 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2016 Kaitlin Louise Aspinwall ALL RIGHT RESERVED ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Tonya Flesher for all of the help that you have given me throughout my thesis and for all of the effort you put into assisting me. I could not have completed my thesis without your continued support and guidance. Additionally, thank your Dr. Rhodes and Dr. Wilder for serving as my second and third readers. Thank you to Jon Traub who assisted me in creating a thesis topic that catered to my interests in tax, accounting, and policy. Thank you to all of my friends who supported me throughout this entire process and continuously pushed me and encouraged me to complete my thesis. A special thank you to my family for all of their love and support throughout my entire life but specifically during my time at Ole Miss and in the Honors College.
    [Show full text]
  • April 9, 2009 Meeting Transcript
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON THE 21st CENTURY ECONOMY YZ STATE OF CALIFORNIA REVENUE & TAXATION FUNDAMENTAL TAX ALTERNATIVES XW PUBLIC MEETING Thursday, April 9, 2009 9:07 a.m. – 5:03 p.m. University of California, Davis Walter A. Buehler Alumni & Visitors Center Mrak Hall Drive Davis, California XW Reported by: Daniel P. Feldhaus Certified Shorthand Reporter #6949 Registered Diplomate Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter Daniel P. Feldhaus, C.S.R., Inc. Certified Shorthand Reporters 8414 Yermo Way, Sacramento, California 95828 Telephone 916.682.9482 Fax 916.688.0723 [email protected] 1 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – April 9, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present GERRY PARSKY Commission Chair Aurora Capital Group RUBEN BARRALES President/CEO San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce MICHAEL BOSKIN Professor Stanford University JOHN COGAN Professor Stanford University EDWARD DE LA ROSA Founder and President Edward J. De La Rosa & Company, Inc. CHRISTOPHER EDLEY, JR. Dean/Professor of Law Boalt Hall School of Law GEORGE HALVORSON Chairman/CEO Kaiser Foundation WILLIAM HAUCK Trustee, California State University Director Blue Shield of California & Blue Shield Foundation JENNIFER ITO Research, Training, Policy Director SCOPE FRED KEELEY Treasurer, County of Santa Cruz Professor, San José State University Daniel P. Feldhaus, CSR, Inc. 916.682.9482 2 st Commission on the 21 Century Economy – April 9, 2009 A P P E A R A N C E S COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY ECONOMY Commissioners Present continued MONICA LOZANO Publisher/CEO La Opinión REBECCA MORGAN President Morgan Family Foundation RICHARD POMP Alva P.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Fairtax Won't Work
    (C) Tax Analysts 2007. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. Why the FairTax Won’t Work an aging society could be borne with relative ease.1 Unfortunately, the administrative problems inherent in By Bruce Bartlett this proposal make it impossible to take seriously. People know how the current tax system operates. They receive gross wages from their employers and automatically have income and payroll taxes withheld Bruce Bartlett was formerly Treasury deputy assis- from their paychecks. A worker may see that his em- tant secretary for economic policy and executive di- ployer pays him $1,000 per week, but he has only $800 to rector of the congressional Joint Economic Committee. spend because of all the taxes. In this article, he criticizes the FairTax, a tax reform FairTax advocates repeatedly claim that their proposal proposal supported by former Arkansas Gov. Mike would allow all workers to keep 100 percent of their Huckabee, a candidate for the Republican presidential paychecks. The clear implication is that withholding nomination. The proposal alleges that a 23 percent would simply disappear. The worker now netting $800 national retail sales tax collected by the states would per week would immediately get a $200 raise and start be sufficient to replace all federal taxes. That would taking home the full $1,000 gross wage that he is paid. allow for abolition of the IRS and other benefits, Instead of paying income and payroll taxes, workers supporters claim. would pay their taxes when they buy things. The FairTax would impose a 23 percent tax on all goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fairtax White Paper
    A FairTaxsm White Paper The FairTax benefits farmers and ranchers by Ross Korves About five million Americans live on the nation’s 2.1 million farms and ranches. Farming and ranching remain as vital to the economy today as they have been throughout our nation’s history. In 2005, farming and ranching produced crops and livestock valued at $249.2 billion and generated $109.4 billion in added value to the gross domestic product of the country.1 These enterprises employed 3,034,000 workers, including 2,198,000 full time and part-time farm operators and 834,000 hired employees. Agricultural products comprise 7.7 percent of all exports from the U.S., for a total of $62.3 billion in exported products in fiscal year 2004. Farms and ranches generate economic activity that transcends the rural communities in which they were produced, creating upstream jobs in manufacturing and downstream jobs in processing, transportation, retailing, and exporting. I. Farmers and ranchers are disadvantaged under the income tax system. Some policy analysts argue that farming and ranching are subsidized under our current income tax system. These include favorable accounting and inventory methods, certain income deferral provisions, capital gain/ordinary loss treatment and expensing allowances. However, rather than being subsidies, these are simply practical accommodations in an income tax system that is overly complex for most farmers and ranchers with relatively simple business structures. Although the effective tax rate has been gradually declining from the stratospheric level of 1980, farmers and ranchers still bear high tax and compliance burdens on the operation of their businesses.
    [Show full text]