Experimental Studies with Nematodes in Ecotoxicology: an Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experimental Studies with Nematodes in Ecotoxicology: an Overview Journal of Nematology 47(1):11–27. 2015. Ó The Society of Nematologists 2015. Experimental Studies with Nematodes in Ecotoxicology: An Overview 1 2 3 1 ARNE HA¨ GERBA¨ UMER, SEBASTIAN HO¨ SS, PETER HEININGER, AND WALTER TRAUNSPURGER Abstract: With respect to their high abundances, their role as intermediaries between microorganisms and higher trophic levels, and their ubiquitous occurrence in all habitats, nematodes are of strong potential interest as environmental indicators. Ecotox- icological methods to evaluate the risk of anthropogenic pollutants on ecosystems require both in vitro and in vivo toxicity tests to investigate either mechanisms or pathways of toxicity and to set accurate toxicity thresholds. For this, the interest in nematodes as model organisms in ecotoxicology increased over the past few decades and existing appropriate experimental methods are reviewed in this manuscript. An overview of the various existing ecotoxicological tools for nematodes, ranging from molecular laboratory methods to experimental model ecosystem approaches, and their role as indicator organisms is given. The reviewed studies, ap- proaches that range from species-based to community-based methods, reveal exciting possibilities for the future use of nematodes in ecotoxicological studies. Suitable ecotoxicological tools and ecological indices for nematodes should be integrated in weight-of- evidence approaches for assessing the ecological risk of contamination. Key words: chemicals, contamination, ecology, ecotoxicology, free-living, freshwater, marine, methods, microcosms, model ecosystems, molecular, NemaSPEAR[%] index, review, single species, soil. Due to their high ecological relevance in freshwater, EFSA, 2013). To refine toxicity thresholds (and reduce marine, and terrestrial habitats, nematodes are of safety risks), higher-tier testing is required (Boxall et al., strong potential interest as environmental indicators 2002). This can be achieved using (i) chronic toxicity (Wilson and Kakouli-Duarte, 2009). Two symposia on endpoints (e.g., reproduction), (ii) realistic exposure ‘‘Nematodes as Environmental Bioindicators’’ 2007 in scenarios (e.g., sediments for scarcely soluble sub- Edinburgh (United Kingdom) and 2012 in Gent stances), or (iii) ecologically more relevant multispecies (Belgium) helped to open avenues of communication test systems (model ecosystems), such as microsomes or between various scientists and stakeholders. In general, mesocosms. Regulatory authorities have to rely on en- the interest in nematodes in the field of ecotoxicology vironmentally safe thresholds for chemicals in the is growing. If searching for the terms ‘‘nematode*’’ process of chemical authorization and restriction of AND ‘‘ecotoxicology’’ in Google Scholar, the number of their release in the environment (e.g., European Reg- hits increased 10-fold within the last 20 years (which is ulation, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals above average of the overall increase in ecotoxico- [REACH]). In retrospective risk assessments, the eco- logical papers). A considerable part (25%) of these logical status or quality of an ecosystem is assessed by papers on nematodes describes studies with the model evaluating the in situ fauna or flora (WFD; European nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Community, 2000). Here, indicator systems can help to Ecotoxicological methods to evaluate the risk of an- identify habitats with poor ecological status and to link thropogenic pollutants on ecosystems, must (i) assess this status to the presence of chemical pollution or the toxicity of single chemicals or chemical mixtures in other types of stress, including hydromorphological water, sediment, and soil (European Commision, 2003; modifications and climate change (e.g., Von der Ohe ECHA, 2008; EFSA, 2013) and (ii) evaluate the eco- et al., 2007; Von der Ohe and Goedkoop, 2013). Ap- logical status or quality of certain ecosystem compart- propriate actions to improve the ecological status of ments, such as soil or sediments that are potentially ecosystems (as mandated by the European Union WFD) exposed to pollution (European Water Framework Di- can only be taken if the causes of the deleterious effects rective [WFD]) (European Community, 2000). A pro- on the ecosystem are known (De Zwart et al., 2009). spective risk assessment requires both in vitro and in For all these challenges in ecotoxicology (or applied vivo toxicity tests to investigate mechanisms of toxicity ecology), there exist appropriate experimental methods and to set accurate toxicity thresholds, such as NOEC that use nematodes as a model or indicator organism. (no observed effect concentrations) and EC10 (the These methods are reviewed in this manuscript. Al- concentration at which 10% of the total effect occurs) though many studies have examined the effects of for regulatory purposes (European Commision, 2003; chemicals on a single species (mainly using C. elegans), much less is known about the ecotoxicological impact on nematodes in multispecies set-ups or at the community Received for publication December 5, 2014. 1Department of Animal Ecology, University of Bielefeld, Konsequenz 45, level. Here, we provide an overview of the various eco- 33615 Bielefeld, Germany. toxicological tools that already exist for nematodes, 2Ecossa, Giselastr. 6, 82319 Starnberg, Germany. 3German Federal Institute of Hydrology, Mainzer Tor 1, 56968 Koblenz, ranging from molecular laboratory methods to experi- Germany. mental model ecosystem approaches (Fig. 1). This re- We are grateful to the German Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), which funded the preparation of this review as part of the project ‘‘Validation of the view is divided into two parts: (i) the first part gives an NemaSPEAR[%] index based on field studies and laboratory experiments’’ overview of laboratory methods that were applied to (project no. M39620004003). E-mail: [email protected] study effects of chemicals on a single nematode species, This paper was edited by Jyotsna Sharma. as listed in Table 1. Due to the vast number of studies 11 12 Journal of Nematology, Volume 47, No. 1, March 2015 FIG. 1. Ecotoxicological methods at different organizational and ecological levels that can be applied using nematodes as test or indicator organisms. Omics stands for genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics. GFP = green fluorescent protein, DEB-Tox = dynamic energy budget theory applied to toxicological issues; NemaSPEAR = nematode species at risk. with C. elegans in, e.g., medical research, this section is various nematode species, mainly bacterial feeders, not claiming completeness. However, the reader can have been used for testing the toxicity of chemicals and find a comprehensive compilation of examples for im- environmental samples (e.g., C. elegans, Panagrellus portant environmental chemicals and links for continu- redivivus, Plectus acuminatus, Monhystera disjuncta). Apart ative reviews on specific topics; (ii) the second part gives from C. elegans, which is by far the most commonly used an overview of relevant studies on effects of chemicals nematode in single-species testing, various other soil on free-living nematode communities in experimental and marine nematode species have been employed to set-ups (model ecosystems). A comprehensive literature assess the toxicity of (i) toxic compounds, such as heavy research was carried out in ISI Web of Science using the metals, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals, and (ii) con- search term ‘‘nematode*’’ AND ‘‘ecotoxicology’’ AND taminated natural samples (Table 1). (‘‘microcosm*’’ OR ‘‘mesocosm*’’), revealing more Due to the nearly ideal qualities of C. elegans as than 2000 hits. Based on this pool, studies dealing with a model organism in genetics, developmental biology, community assessment parameters of free-living nem- and medical biochemistry (e.g. easy culture, simple atodes, as listed in Table 2, were categorized as relevant body plan, and short generation and life cycle), the for our field of interest and reviewed, whereas publi- effects of chemicals on this nematode species at various cations concerning other fields of research, e.g., studies organizational levels (molecular, organs, whole organ- on genetic and metabolomic responses to chemicals as ism, and population) have already been described. well as applications with parasitic nematodes as con- Therefore, many molecular and biomedical methods sidered organisms, were excluded (NOT ‘‘gen*’’ or exist for C. elegans that could be exploited for ecotox- ‘‘metabolom*’’ or ‘‘parasit*’’). The yielded ecotoxico- icological purposes (for reviews see, e.g., Kaletta and logical microcosm studies were screened on the use of Hengartner, 2006; Menzel et al., 2009a; Hulme and a representative (nematode) community, an adequate Whitesides, 2011). Also, for whole-organism toxicity description of the experimental set-up, and reported testing the most mature and standardized test systems exposure concentrations of the used chemicals. Beside are those developed for C. elegans (ASTM E2172-01: the mentioned nematode community assessment pa- ASTM, 2001; ISO 10872: ISO, 2010; for reviews see, e.g., rameters, tested chemicals, type of microcosm, dura- Leung et al., 2008; Hoss€ and Williams, 2009; Muschiol tion, and extraction methods were recorded (Table 2). et al., 2009). Effects at the molecular level: C. elegans is one of the most LABORATORY ECOTOXICOLOGICAL METHODS WITH A important nonmammalian model organisms, besides SINGLE SPECIES Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Pathogenic Bacteria Transfer from Pristionchus
    Assessment of Pathogenic Bacteria Transfer From Pristionchus Entomophagus (Nematoda: Diplogasteridae) to the Invasive Ant Myrmica Rubra and Its Potential Role in Colony Mortality in Coastal Maine Suzanne Lynn Ishaq ( [email protected] ) School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 2615-8055 Alice Hotopp University of Maine Samantha Silverbrand University of Maine Jonathan E. Dumont Husson University Amy Michaud University of California Davis Jean MacRae University of Maine S. Patricia Stock University of Arizona Eleanor Groden University of Maine Research Article Keywords: bacterial community, biological control, microbial transfer, nematodes, Illumina, Galleria mellonella larvae Posted Date: November 5th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-101817/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/38 Abstract Background: Necromenic nematode Pristionchus entomophagus has been frequently found in nests of the invasive European ant Myrmica rubra in coastal Maine, United States. The nematodes may contribute to ant mortality and collapse of colonies by transferring environmental bacteria. M. rubra ants naturally hosting nematodes were collected from collapsed wild nests in Maine and used for bacteria identication. Virulence assays were carried out to validate acquisition and vectoring of environmental bacteria to the ants. Results: Multiple bacteria species, including Paenibacillus spp., were found in the nematodes’ digestive tract. Serratia marcescens, Serratia nematodiphila, and Pseudomonas uorescens were collected from the hemolymph of nematode-infected Galleria mellonella larvae. Variability was observed in insect virulence in relation to the site origin of the nematodes. In vitro assays conrmed uptake of RFP-labeled Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 by nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhylina, Shevchenko.Pdf
    ЕКОЛОГІЯ H. B. Humenyuk, V. O. Khomenchuk, N. G. Zinkovska Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine Taras Shevchenko Regional Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kremenets, Ukraine TYPES OF MODELLING THE ENVIRONMENT AND PECULIARITIES OF THEIR USE It is found that mathematical or imitating modeling is one of the most useful and effective forms of modeling, which represent the most significant features of real objects, processes, systems and phenomena studied by various sciences. The main purpose of factor analysis - reducing the dimension of the source data for the purpose of economical description by providing minimal loss of the initial information. The result of factor analysis is the transition from the set output variables to significantly fewer new variables - factors. Factor is interpreted as a common cause of the variability of the multiple output variables. The value of the revealed factors is 4,37 and 1.98 respectively. The selected factors include 79,5% of general dispersion (54,7 and 24,8 % respectively). Thus the accumulated percentage of both factors dispersion (79,5 %) defines how fully we can describe the set of date with the help of selected factors. The higher this index is the larger part of the data was factorized and the more credible the factorial model is. In widespread application of modeling in solving the problem of knowledge and environmental protection the combination of two tendencies which are characteristic of the modern science are singled out – cybernation and ecologization. The information systems are used to choose the optimal ways of different resources application in order to predict the consequences of environmental pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY This Page Intentionally Left Blank €ƒÂ€ an INTRODUCTION to AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
    AN INTRODUCTION TO AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY This page intentionally left blank AN INTRODUCTION TO AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY MIKKO NIKINMAA Professor of Zoology, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Animal Physiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangement with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology: a Research Framework
    Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology: A Research Framework Susan Anderson,1 Walter Sadinski,1 Lee Shugart,2 Peter Brussard,3 Michael Depledge,4 Tim Ford,5 JoEllen Hose,6 John Stegeman,7 William Suk,8 Isaac Wirgin,9 and Gerald Wogan0 1Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California; 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 3University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada; 4University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK; 5Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 6 CCidental College, Los Angeles, California; 7Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, Massachusetts; 8National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 9New York University Medical Center, Tuxedo, New York; 10Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts Participants at the Napa Conference on Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology assessed the status of this field in light of heightened concerns about the genetic effects of exposure to hazardous substances and recent advancements in our capabilities to measure those effects. We present here a synthesis of the ideas discussed throughout the conference, including definitions of important concepts in the field and critical research needs and opportunities. While there were many opinions expressed on these topics, there was general agreement that there are substantive new opportuni- ties to improve the impact of genetic and molecular ecotoxicology on prediction of sublethal effects of exposure to hazardous substances. Future studies should emphasize integration of genetic ecotoxicology, ecological genetics, and molecular biology and should be directed toward improving our understanding of the ecological implications of genotoxic responses. Ecological implications may be assessed at either the population or ecosys- tem level; however, a population-level focus may be most pragmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Markers, Indicator Taxa, and Community Indices: the Issue of Bioindication Accuracy
    NEMATODES AS ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS This page intentionally left blank NEMATODES AS ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS Edited by Michael J. Wilson Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, The University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Thomais Kakouli-Duarte EnviroCORE Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology, Carlow, Ireland CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CAB International 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nematodes as environmental indicators / edited by Michael J. Wilson, Thomais Kakouli-Duarte. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84593-385-2 (alk. paper) 1. Nematodes–Ecology. 2. Indicators (Biology) I. Wilson, Michael J. (Michael John), 1964- II. Kakouli-Duarte, Thomais. III. Title. QL391.N4N382 2009 592'.5717--dc22 2008049111 ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 385 2 Typeset by SPi, Pondicherry, India. Printed and bound in the UK by the MPG Books Group. The paper used for the text pages in this book is FSC certified. The FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) is an international network to promote responsible man- agement of the world’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortcomings of the Laboratory-Derived Median Lethal Concentration for Predicting Mortality in Field Populations: Exposure Duration and Latent Mortality
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 2147±2153, 2004 q 2004 SETAC Printed in the USA 0730-7268/04 $12.00 1 .00 SHORTCOMINGS OF THE LABORATORY-DERIVED MEDIAN LETHAL CONCENTRATION FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN FIELD POPULATIONS: EXPOSURE DURATION AND LATENT MORTALITY YUAN ZHAO* and MICHAEL C. NEWMAN Department of Environmental and Aquatic Animal Health, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062-1346, USA (Received 15 October 2003; Accepted 9 February 2004) AbstractÐExposure duration and intensity (concentration or dose) determine lethal effects of toxicants. However, environmental regulators have focused on exposure intensity and have considered duration only peripherally. Conventional testing for toxicology tends to ®x exposure time and to use the median lethal concentration (LC50) at that time to quantify mortality. Fixing the exposure duration and selecting the 50% mortality level for reasons of statistical and logistical convenience result in the loss of ecologically relevant information generated at all other times and ignore latent mortality that manifests after the exposure ends. In the present study, we used survival analysis, which is widely employed in other ®elds, to include both time and concentration as covariates and to quantify latent mortality. This was done with two contrasting toxicants, copper sulfate (CuSO4) and sodium pentachlorophenol (NaPCP). Amphipods (Hyalella azteca) were exposed to different toxicant concentrations, and the percentage mortalities were noted both during and after the exposure ended. For CuSO4 at the conventional 48-h LC50 concentrations, the predicted proportions dead after including latent mortality were 65 to 85%, not 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals
    EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS ECETOC at a glance 2 Purpose 3 Values 3 Vision 3 Mission 3 Approach 3 Membership 4 ECETOC Member Companies 4 Membership benefits 5 Message from the Chairman 6 ECETOC Board of Administration 7 Report from the Secretary General 8 Science Programme 10 Foreword from the Scientific Committee Chairman 10 ECETOC revises its science strategy 11 Summary of the 2011 Science Programme 12 Highlights of 2011 15 Task forces established 16 Task forces completed 18 Workshops 21 Symposia and other meetings 24 Science Awards 28 Long-range Research Initiative 29 Communication 31 Publications 31 Online communication 32 External Representation 32 Members of the Scientific Committee 34 Members of the Secretariat 34 Finance 35 Abbreviations 36 ECETOC I European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals I Annual Report 2011 I page 2 Introduction Membership Message Board of Report from Science Science Long-range Communication Members of Finance Abbreviations from the Administration the Secretary Programme Awards Research the Scientific Chairman General Initiative Committee Established in 1978, ECETOC is Europe’s leading industry association for developing and promoting top quality science in human and environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Members include the main companies with interests in the manufacture and use of chemicals, biomaterials and pharmaceuticals, and organisations active in these fields. ECETOC is the scientific forum where member company experts meet and co-operate with government and academic scientists, to evaluate and assess the available data, identify gaps in knowledge and recommend research, and publish critical reviews on the ecotoxicology and toxicology of chemicals, biomaterials and pharmaceuticals.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
    Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks SCHER Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks SCENIHR Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures The SCHER approved this opinion at its 15th plenary of 22 November 2011 The SCENIHR approved this opinion at its 16th plenary of 30 November 2011 The SCCS approved this opinion at its 14th plenary of 14 December 2011 1 Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCCS The Committee shall provide opinions on questions concerning all types of health and safety risks (notably chemical, biological, mechanical and other physical risks) of non- food consumer products (for example: cosmetic products and their ingredients, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care and household products such as detergents, etc.) and services (for example: tattooing, artificial sun tanning, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection
    ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Technical Report No. 138 EUROPEAN CENTRE OFOR EC TOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Technical Report No. 138 Brussels, March 2021 ISSN-2079-1526-138 (online) ECETOC TR No. 138 1 ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection 224504 ECETOC Technical Report No. 138 © Copyright – ECETOC AISBL European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Rue Belliard 40, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Applications to reproduce, store, copy or translate should be made to the Secretary General. ECETOC welcomes such applications. Reference to the document, its title and summary may be copied or abstracted in data retrieval systems without subsequent reference. The content of this document has been prepared and reviewed by experts on behalf of ECETOC with all possible care and from the available scientific information. It is provided for information only. ECETOC cannot accept any responsibility or liability and does not provide a warranty for any use or interpretation of the material contained in the publication. ECETOC TR No. 138 2 ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Table of Contents 1. SUMMARY 6 2. INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLES 9 2.1. Background and Principles 9 2.2. Current Regulatory Framework and Guidance 10 2.2.1. Historical perspectives and the evolution of test guidelines 10 2.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation" (2012)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 2012 Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their aN tional and International Regulation K. Christiana Grim Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Anne Fairbrother EcoSciences Barnett A. Rattner U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Grim, K. Christiana; Fairbrother, Anne; and Rattner, Barnett A., "Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation" (2012). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 969. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/969 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in New Directions in Conservation Medicine: Applied Cases in Ecological Health, edited by A. Alonso Aguirre, Richard S. Ostfield, and Peter Daszak (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012). Authors K. Christiana Grim, D.V.M. Research Associate Center for Species Survival Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Front Royal, Vrrginia Anne Fairbrother, D.V.M., M.S., Ph.D. Senior Managing Scientist EcoSciences Exponent Seattle, Washington Barnett A. Rattner, Ph.D. Ecotoxicologist U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Beltsville Laboratory Beltsville, Maryland WILDLIFE TOXICOLOGY Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation K. Christiana Grim, Anne Fairbrother, and Barnett A.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Studies Reveal a Close Relative of C. Elegans Thrives in the Fresh Figs
    Woodruf and Phillips BMC Ecol (2018) 18:26 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0182-z BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Field studies reveal a close relative of C. elegans thrives in the fresh fgs of Ficus septica and disperses on its Ceratosolen pollinating wasps Gavin C. Woodruf1,2* and Patrick C. Phillips2 Abstract Background: Biotic interactions are ubiquitous and require information from ecology, evolutionary biology, and functional genetics in order to be understood. However, study systems that are amenable to investigations across such disparate felds are rare. Figs and fg wasps are a classic system for ecology and evolutionary biology with poor functional genetics; Caenorhabditis elegans is a classic system for functional genetics with poor ecology. In order to help bridge these disciplines, here we describe the natural history of a close relative of C. elegans, Caenorhabditis inopi- nata, that is associated with the fg Ficus septica and its pollinating Ceratosolen wasps. Results: To understand the natural context of fg-associated Caenorhabditis, fresh F. septica fgs from four Okinawan islands were sampled, dissected, and observed under microscopy. C. inopinata was found in all islands where F. septica fgs were found. C.i nopinata was routinely found in the fg interior and almost never observed on the outside surface. C. inopinata was only found in pollinated fgs, and C. inopinata was more likely to be observed in fgs with more foun- dress pollinating wasps. Actively reproducing C. inopinata dominated early phase fgs, whereas late phase fgs with emerging wasp progeny harbored C. inopinata dauer larvae. Additionally, C. inopinata was observed dismounting from Ceratosolen pollinating wasps that were placed on agar plates.
    [Show full text]
  • Alteration of Microflora of the Facultative Parasitic Nematode Pristionchus Entomophagus and Its Potential Application As a Biological Control Agent
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2013 Alteration of Microflora of the Facultative Parasitic Nematode Pristionchus Entomophagus and its Potential Application as a Biological Control Agent Amy M. Michaud University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Recommended Citation Michaud, Amy M., "Alteration of Microflora of the Facultative Parasitic Nematode Pristionchus Entomophagus and its Potential Application as a Biological Control Agent" (2013). Honors College. 134. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/134 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALTERATION OF MICROFLORA OF THE FACULTATIVE PARASITIC NEMATODE PRISTIONCHUS ENTOMOPHAGUS AND ITS POTENTIAL APPLICATION AS A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT by Amy M. Michaud A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (Biology) The Honors College University of Maine May 2013 Advisory Committee: Dr. Eleanor Groden, Professor of Entomology, Advisor Dr. Dave Lambert, Associate Professor of Plant Pathology Elissa Ballman, Research Associate in Invasive Species and Entomology Dr. Francois Amar, Associate Professor of Physical Chemistry Dr. John Singer, Professor of Microbiology Abstract: Pristionchus entomophagus is a microbivorous, facultative, parasitic nematode commonly found in soil and decaying organic matter in North America and Europe. This nematode can form an alternative juvenile life stage capable of infecting an insect host. The microflora of P.
    [Show full text]