DOCSLIB.ORG

Teaching the History of the Manhattan Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HistoryNEWSLETTER Physics A FORUM OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICALof SOCIETY • VOLUME XI • NO. 2 • SPRING 2 0 1 0 Teaching the History of the Manhattan Project By B. Cameron Reed, Alma College, [email protected] he development of nuclear requirements comprise about one- weapons during the Man- third of a student’s overall credit Thattan Project in World War requirements for graduation. Within II is one of the most significant the natural sciences area we have a events of the twentieth century. physical-science requirement, with The strategic, scientific, national courses such as astronomy, environ- policy, and security issues asso- mental studies, general physics, and ciated with nuclear weapons chemistry being popular choices. are never far from the headlines Alma operates on a “4-4-1” and will remain with us for gen- schedule: two traditional four- erations to come. If asked “What month terms (Fall and Winter), was the Manhattan Project and followed by a one-month Spring who was involved with it?”, term. The latter begins in late April many individuals would prob- and runs for about 3.5 weeks until ably answer that it had some- just before Memorial Day. During thing to do with the making of Spring term, students take one atomic bombs and perhaps offer course intensively, often meeting a name such as Oppenheimer or every day for 3-4 hours (or even Fermi or (erroneously) Einstein. more if a lab is involved); they are Beyond that, knowledge would Students at the Trinity Test Site monument. Photo required to complete two Spring likely become fuzzier, with some courtesy of Ed Neuenschwander and the Society of terms to graduate. This provides a aware that the Trinity bomb was Physics Students. venue for courses that would not tested in New Mexico before otherwise conveniently fit into a Little Boy and Fat Man were dropped on Hiroshima and regular term: many offerings involve field work or a travel Nagasaki. While some respondents would know that those component. But since many students prefer not to travel for devices used uranium and plutonium as their “active ingre- their Spring terms, a demand for on-campus classes always dients,” how many could explain how those materials were exists, particularly ones that carry general-education credit obtained and why their properties demanded radically and have minimal prerequisites. different designs for the Hiroshima and Trinity/Nagasaki weapons? How many could give a cogent explanation Continued on page 3 of the term “critical mass?” Indeed, many of our physics majors probably graduate with little better understanding of the science underlying nuclear weapons than that with InsIde ThIs Issue which they emerged from high school. For several years I have taught a general-education Editor’s Corner 2 course on the history of the Manhattan Project to students at Alma College in an effort to address, in a small way, the general lack of knowledge in this area. In this article 2010 Pais Prize Winner 3 I describe my experience in developing and teaching this class. I would be interested in knowing about the experi- “April” Meeting Reports 4 ences of anyone else doing something similar. Alma College is a strictly undergraduate liberal-arts school of about 1,300 students located in central Michigan. Call for Nominations 13 In addition to choosing a major, every student must com- plete a requisite number of credits in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. These general-education New Books of Note 14 Editors’ Corner To all the authors who contributed discussions about nuclear weapons This past semester one student, a articles for this issue of our newsletter, and their consequences. As with so psychology major, wrote “This week I I express my appreciation. The article many topics, I find this one is best have been thinking a lot about the sci- by Cameron Reed on teaching the his- approached through its history. entists who developed nuclear weap- tory of the Manhattan Project hit me Although I cannot go into the depth ons. The video that we watched last rather close to home. For over twenty that Professor Reed does in his dedi- week [The Day After Trinity by Jon years I have taught a general-education cated course, I can affirm some of his Else, 1980] certainly shed a different course called “Science, Technology, experiences. I have seen the looks of perspective on the whole issue. I am & Society.” This has been a fulfilling surprise when students realize that the finding more and more that you really and enjoyable task. It allows me to authors of the first-generation nuclear do not understand a situation until you meet students of all majors across the weapons were people of warm human- are able to see it from the inside out…” campus community. It presents an ity who found themselves in unprec- The study of the history of physics opportunity to share a glimpse into edented circumstances. I have read the powerfully helps us to see physics, and evidence-based reasoning, and helps student essays and heard their in-class its interactions with the larger society, students discover how the methods of vocalizations as they struggle with the from the inside out. Thanks again to all science cannot be reduced to a univer- “what would I have done at the time” the authors who contributed articles for sal checklist. Together we think about questions. I have seen their astonish- this issue of our newsletter. With each the implications, for individuals and ment when they realize how much the article, I find that I learn something across societies and timescales, of sci- Cold War really cost. I have witnessed interesting. ence and its applications. their reactions when they see that poli- Each semester this adventure cies are not always consistent with a —Dwight E. (Ed) Neuenschwander, includes two or three weeks of nation’s mythos and rhetoric. Editor APS Policy on Peer Review Materials By Michael Riordan, Forum Councilor The Forum on History of Phys- At the November 2009 meeting at its 18 April 2010 meeting. This ics of the American Physical of the APS Council, Roger Stuewer statement can be accessed on the Society publishes this Newsletter moved that the APS establish a com- APS web site at: http://publish.aps.org/ semiannually. Nonmembers who mittee to make recommendations peer-review-materials-policy. wish to receive the Newsletter regarding release of peer-review mate- Briefly, it states that peer-review should make a donation to the rials on articles submitted to its jour- materials will not normally be released Forum of $5 per year (+ $3 addi- nals. He noted that the APS did not until 50 years have lapsed. No mate- tional for airmail). Each 3-year then have an official policy regarding rials that identify living individu- volume consists of six issues. such release to scholarly researchers, als will be released without their The articles in this issue repre- and that it was largely left to the dis- written consent. Exceptions can be sent the views of their authors cretion of the Editor-in-Chief. made only at the discretion of the APS and are not necessarily those of In the following months, a com- Editor-in-Chief. the Forum or APS. mittee chaired by Forum member The Council agreed that this Robert Crease of the State Univer- policy represents a fair compromise Editor sity of New York at Stony Brook, between the needs of historians and including current Forum Chair for access to this information and Dwight E. Neuenschwander Daniel Kleppner, formulated a for- the requirements of the APS pub- Department of Physics mal policy statement, which was lishing department to protect the Southern Nazarene University approved unanimously by the Council confidentiality of its reviewers. n Bethany, OK 73008 [email protected] (405) 491-6361 Archiving FHP Associate Editor FHP Webmaster George Zimmer- Valley, the history of telescopes, and Don Lemons man has been working with speakers so forth. Photographs from the ses- Department of Physics at FHP sessions to have their presenta- sions are also on the FHP website. In Bethel College tions posted on the FHP website, http:// progress is a posting of letters and North Newton, KS 67117 www.aps.org/units/fhp. These presenta- documents on the founding of the FHP [email protected] tions are valuable historical resources— itself (originally, the Division of the on John Wheeler, Lev Landau, Silicon History of Physics) during 1978-1980. 2 Volume XI, No. 2 • Spring 2010 • History of Physics Newsletter Manhattan Project Russell McCormmach, 2010 Pais Prize Winner Continued from page 1 Last fall this newsletter reported For many years I have person- that Russell K. McCormmach had been ally been interested in the history and selected as the recipient of the 2010 physics of the Manhattan Project. By Abraham Pais Prize for the History the year 2002 I felt that I had acquired of Physics, “for the study of German enough understanding of the physics science in the 19th and 20th centu- of the topic that I was ready to offer a ries and a major biography of Henry Spring-term course with a prerequisite Cavendish (with Christa Jungnickel, of basic algebra. I have now taught his late wife), and for founding the the course a total of five times since journal Historical Studies in the Physical then, as well as a spin-off “First-Year Sciences.” We promised at that time Seminar” course that was offered for to offer additional notes on Professor the first time in Fall 2009. McCormmach’s work. The text for the course is Richard Professor McCormmach’s work has Rhodes masterful book The Making had a profound influence in transform- of the Atomic Bomb, from which the ing the study of the history of physics course draws its title.
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Technology

    Nuclear Technology

    Nuclear Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. GREENWOOD PRESS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY Sourcebooks in Modern Technology Space Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. Sourcebooks in Modern Technology Nuclear Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Angelo, Joseph A. Nuclear technology / Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. p. cm.—(Sourcebooks in modern technology) Includes index. ISBN 1–57356–336–6 (alk. paper) 1. Nuclear engineering. I. Title. II. Series. TK9145.A55 2004 621.48—dc22 2004011238 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2004 by Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2004011238 ISBN: 1–57356–336–6 First published in 2004 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 To my wife, Joan—a wonderful companion and soul mate Contents Preface ix Chapter 1. History of Nuclear Technology and Science 1 Chapter 2. Chronology of Nuclear Technology 65 Chapter 3. Profiles of Nuclear Technology Pioneers, Visionaries, and Advocates 95 Chapter 4. How Nuclear Technology Works 155 Chapter 5. Impact 315 Chapter 6. Issues 375 Chapter 7. The Future of Nuclear Technology 443 Chapter 8. Glossary of Terms Used in Nuclear Technology 485 Chapter 9. Associations 539 Chapter 10.
  • Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015)

    Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015)

    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015) C H Townes shared the Nobel Prize in 1964 for the concept of the laser and the earlier realization of the concept at microwave frequencies, called the maser. He passed away in January of this year, six months short of his hundredth birthday. A cursory look at the archives shows a paper as late as 2011 – ‘The Dust Distribution Immediately Surrounding V Hydrae’, a contribution to infrared astronomy. To get a feel for the range in time and field, his 1936 masters thesis was based on repairing a non-functional van de Graaf accelerator at Duke University in 1936! For his PhD at the California Institute of Technology, he measured the spin of the nucleus of carbon-13 using isotope separation and high resolution spectroscopy. Smythe, his thesis supervisor was writing a comprehensive text on electromagnetism, and Townes solved every problem in it – it must have stood him in good stead in what followed. In 1939, even a star student like him did not get an academic job. The industrial job he took set him on his lifetime course. This was at the legendary Bell Telephone Laboratories, the research wing of AT&T, the company which set up and ran the first – and then the best – telephone system in the world. He was initially given a lot of freedom to work with different research groups. During the Second World War, he worked in a group developing a radar based system for guiding bombs. But his goal was always physics research. After the War, Bell Labs, somewhat reluctantly, let him pursue microwave spectroscopy, on the basis of a technical report he wrote suggesting that molecules might serve as circuit elements at high frequencies which were important for communication.
  • Samuel Goudsmit

    Samuel Goudsmit

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT 1 9 0 2 — 1 9 7 8 A Biographical Memoir by BENJAMIN BEDERSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory. SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT July 11, 1902–December 4, 1978 BY BENJAMIN BEDERSON AM GOUDSMIT LED A CAREER that touched many aspects of S20th-century physics and its impact on society. He started his professional life in Holland during the earliest days of quantum mechanics as a student of Paul Ehrenfest. In 1925 together with his fellow graduate student George Uhlenbeck he postulated that in addition to mass and charge the electron possessed a further intrinsic property, internal angular mo- mentum, that is, spin. This inspiration furnished the missing link that explained the existence of multiple spectroscopic lines in atomic spectra, resulting in the final triumph of the then struggling birth of quantum mechanics. In 1927 he and Uhlenbeck together moved to the United States where they continued their physics careers until death. In a rough way Goudsmit’s career can be divided into several separate parts: first in Holland, strictly as a theorist, where he achieved very early success, and then at the University of Michigan, where he worked in the thriving field of preci- sion spectroscopy, concerning himself with the influence of nuclear magnetism on atomic spectra. In 1944 he became the scientific leader of the Alsos Mission, whose aim was to determine the progress Germans had made in the development of nuclear weapons during World War II.
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman

    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman

    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
  • Turning Point in the Development of Quantum Mechanics and the Early Years of the Mossbauer Effect*

    Turning Point in the Development of Quantum Mechanics and the Early Years of the Mossbauer Effect*

    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory FERMILAB-Conf-76/87-THY October 1976 A TURNING POINT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND THE EARLY YEARS OF THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT* Harry J. Lipkin' Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60^39 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory"; Batavia, Illinois 60S10 It is interesting to hear about the exciting early days recalled by Professors Wigner and Wick. I learned quantum theory at a later period, which might be called a turning point in its development, when the general attitude toward quantum mechanics and the study of physics was very different from what it is today. As an undergraduate student in electrical engineering in 19^0 in the United States I found a certain disagreement between the faculty and the students about the "relevance'- of the curriculum. Students thought a k-year course in electrical engineering should include more electronics than a one-semester 3-hour course. But the establishment emphasized the study of power machinery and power transmission because 95'/° of their graduates would eventually get jobs in power. Electronics, they said, was fun for students who were radio hams but useless on the job market. Students at that time did not have today's attitudes and did not stage massive demonstrations and protests against the curriculum. Instead a few of us who wished to learn more interesting things satisfied all the requirements of the engineering school and spent as much extra time as possible listening to fascinating courses in the physics building. There we had the opportunity to listen to two recently-arrived Europeans, Bruno Rossi and Hans Bethe.
  • Laser Spectroscopy to Resolve Hyperfine Structure of Rubidium

    Laser Spectroscopy to Resolve Hyperfine Structure of Rubidium

    Laser spectroscopy to resolve hyperfine structure of rubidium Hannah Saddler, Adam Egbert, and Will Weigand (Dated: 12 November 2015) This experiment had two main goals: to create an absorption spectrum for rubidium using the technique of absorption spectroscopy and to resolve the hyperfine structures for the two rubidium isotopes using saturation absorption spectroscopy. The absorption spectrum was used to determine the frequency difference between the ground state and first excited state for both isotopes. The calculated frequency difference was 6950 MHz ± 90 MHz for rubidium 87 and 3060 MHz ± 60 MHz for rubidium 85. Both values agree with the literature values. The hyperfine structure for rubidium 87 was able to be resolved using this experimental setup. The energy differences were determined to be 260 MHz ± 10 MHz and 150 MHz ± 10 Mhz MHz. The hyperfine structure for rubidium 85 was unable to be resolved using this experimental setup. Additionally the theory of doppler broadening was used to make measurements of the full width half maximum. These values were used to calculate a temperature of 310K ± 40 K which makes sense because the experiments were performed at room temperature. I. INTRODUCTION in the theory section and how they were manipulated and used to derive the results from the recorded data. Addi- tionally there is an explanation of experimental error and The era of modern spectroscopy began with the in- uncertainty associated the results. Section V is a conclu- vention of the laser. The word laser was originally an sion that ties the results of the experiment we performed acronym that stood for light amplification by stimulated to the usefulness of the technique of laser spectroscopy.
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Samuel A

    A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Samuel A

    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, Samuel A. Goudsmit Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 10 January 2020 Version 1.03 Title word cross-reference $3.50 [Bar30, Rid47]. 136 [Cha72]. 138 [Cha72]. 140 [Cha72]. 142 [Cha72]. g [Gou25g]. Sa [Ive10]. Z [LHLT64]. Za [Ive10]. -dependent [LHLT64]. -Werte [Gou25g]. 1947 [Hen48, Whi48]. 1952 [Gou53b]. 1953 [Gou53a]. 1964 [Gou65a]. 1978 [Bed08b, Dre79]. 1983 [Moy84]. 1987 [Lug69]. 1988 [DGS89]. 3d [Tho97]. A-Bomb [Rec91, LRD+91, Bro93, Mac85]. Abides [Gla00]. Abraham [Bed08a, Bed08b]. Absorption [ZHG36]. Abstracts [GT66a, GT68, Gou69a]. Academy [Coc77, Jew77]. accept [Ano54a]. Acceptance [Gou72b]. Account [Lan54]. Ad [Gou72a]. Affirm [ACU+54]. 1 2 Again [GT66c, Gou73e, Rai85]. Age [Lan48, Sul78, Lan59a, Lan59b, Lap59]. AIP [Ano75]. Alamos [Bet91]. Alan [Gou78b]. Alfred [Hol93a, LH93]. Allies [Hol93b]. Alsos [Gou48c, Ano12, Gou47g, Gou47h, Gou47e, Gou48c, Gou51, Gou62, Gou83, Gou96, Pas69, Pas80, Ano48a, Gue50, Hen48, Moy84, Tre83, Whi48]. ALSOS. [Rid47]. Am [Gou74b]. amend [NG70]. American [EBU+52, Gou47b]. Americans [Lan54]. Among [Tre83]. Analyses [BG32, BG68]. Analysis [Gou74a, Wer10]. Analyzed [Gou47c]. Ancient [Gou81]. Angeles [Moy84, Tre83]. Angeles/San [Tre83]. Angewandte [Gou50a]. Angle [Win89, Win87]. Angry [Gou63]. Angular [BL96, NLCS05]. Announcement [Gou58c, Gou58d, Gou58e, Gou68d]. Anomalies [GB33]. Anomalous [Ben38]. anonymity [WG67]. antiquities [RG82]. Application [Hei47a, Hei47b, MU56]. applications [Ike17]. Applied [Gou50a]. Appraisal [Hei49]. Arbeiten [Hei46].
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science

    Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science

    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….
  • April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No

    April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No

    April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No. 4 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Executive Board Expresses Concern Over Funding Imbalance In Bush Administration’s FY2003 Budget Request When President Bush unveiled outside of the scientific community tire research budget of the National for physical science remains es- his FY 2003 budget request for have expressed concern at the im- Science Foundation, in keeping sentially flat, the APS Executive The Executive Board of the R&D in February, no one was sur- balance of research funding with the president’s campaign bud- Board approved a resolution re- American Physical Society ap- prised at the emphasis on priorities in favor of the biological get to double the NIH budget by garding the FY2003 budget plauds the proposed increased antiterrorist, and on homeland sciences. 2003. request at its meeting on Febru- for the NIH and for life sciences and economic security in the wake For example, the National Insti- Noting that while funding for ary 23, 2002. The full text of the generally in the FY2003 Bud- of the September 11th attacks. How- tutes of Health would receive a $3.9 biological and medical research Executive Board statement is con- get Request submitted by President Bush on February 4, ever, many both within and billion increase, larger than the en- continues to increase, funding tained in the box at the right. 2002. However, the Board ex- presses great concern about Task Force to Weigh Pros the requested budgetary lev- Outlook on FY 2003 Budget Bills els for research in the physi- cal sciences.
  • Cornell Gets a New Chair

    Cornell Gets a New Chair

    PEOPLE APPOINTMENTS & AWARDS Cornell gets a new chair Two prominent accelerator physicists and Cornell alumni, Helen T Edwards and her husband, Donald A Edwards, have endowed a chair in accelerator physics at Cornell.The chair is named after Boyce D McDaniel, pro­ fessor emeritus at Cornell. The first holder of the new chair is David L Rubin, professor of physics and director of accelerator physics at Cornell.The donors David Rubin is the first incumbent of the new Boyce McDaniel Chair of Physics at Cornell, asked that the new professorship should be endowed by Helen and Donald Edwards. The chair is named after Boyce D McDaniel. Left awarded to a Cornell faculty member whose to right: Boyce McDaniel, Donald Edwards, David Rubin, Helen Edwards and Maury Tigner, discipline is particle-beam physics and who director of Cornell's Laboratory of Nuclear Studies. would teach both graduate and undergradu­ ate students in addition to doing research. McDaniel, a previous director of nuclear ingthe commissioning of the Main Ring at Helen Edwards is a 1957 graduate of science at Cornell, was Helen Edwards' thesis Fermilab and providing advice for numerous Cornell, where she also earned her PhD in adviser. Initially a graduate student at Cornell, accelerator projects throughout the US, in 1966. She works at Fermilab and at DESY in he left during the Second World War to join the addition to his notable contributions to the Germany. She played a prominent role in the Manhattan Project and returned to complete accelerator and elementary particle physics construction of Fermilab'sTevatron and has his PhD, joining the faculty in 1946.
  • Arxiv:1211.4061V3 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 8 Feb 2013

    Arxiv:1211.4061V3 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 8 Feb 2013

    From cosmic ray physics to cosmic ray astronomy: Bruno Rossi and the opening of new windows on the universe Luisa Bonolis Via Cavalese 13 – 00135 Rome, Italy [email protected] Abstract Bruno Rossi is considered one of the fathers of modern physics, being also a pioneer in virtually every aspect of what is today called high-energy astrophysics. At the beginning of 1930s he was the pioneer of cosmic ray research in Italy, and, as one of the leading actors in the study of the nature and behavior of the cosmic radiation, he witnessed the birth of particle physics and was one of the main investigators in this fields for many years. While cosmic ray physics moved more and more towards astrophysics, Rossi continued to be one of the inspirers of this line of research. When outer space became a reality, he did not hesitate to leap into this new scientific dimension. Rossi’s intuition on the importance of exploiting new technological windows to look at the universe with new eyes, is a fundamental key to understand the profound unity which guided his scientific research path up to its culminating moments at the beginning of 1960s, when his group at MIT performed the first in situ measurements of the density, speed and direction of the solar wind at the boundary of Earth’s magnetosphere, and when he promoted the search for extra-solar sources of X rays. A visionary idea which eventually led to the breakthrough experiment which discovered Scorpius X-1 in 1962, and inaugurated X-ray astronomy.