APPENDIX B New Individual Place Citations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne – Aikenhead Wing Proposed demolition Referral report and Heritage Impact Statement 27 & 31 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy July 2021 Prepared by Prepared for St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Quality Assurance Register The following quality assurance register documents the development and issue of this report prepared by Lovell Chen Pty Ltd in accordance with our quality management system. Project no. Issue no. Description Issue date Approval 8256.03 1 Draft for review 24 June 2021 PL/MK 8256.03 2 Final Referral Report and HIS 1 July 2021 PL Referencing Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced as endnotes or footnotes and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify and acknowledge material from the relevant copyright owners. Moral Rights Lovell Chen Pty Ltd asserts its Moral right in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Lovell Chen’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Limitation Lovell Chen grants the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty- free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral rights of Lovell Chen or third parties. This report is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Lovell Chen Pty Ltd and its Client. Lovell Chen Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. -
PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence
PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Heritage Overlay HO1205 Subject Site: “Chart House”, No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] December 2019 “Chart House” No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Best Hooper, on behalf of Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the heritage aspects of the proposal to grade the site as “Contibutory”, as a consequence of the Guildford and Hardware Laneways Heritage Study prepared by Lovell Chen in May 2017, as a consequence of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365. 2. The previous Property Schedule included in the Guildford & Hardware Laneways Precinct Citation graded the building as Contributory. In effect it graded the east wall abutting Niagara Lane but not the façade addressing Little Bourke Street which Lovell Chen had indicated was not of any significance. Subsequently the Amendment C271 Panel recommended that “Chart House” be included within HO1205 with a Non-contributory grading. When HO1205 came into effect on 12 August 2019, No. 372 – 378 Little Bourke Street was included within HO1205 but with a Contributory, rather than with a Non- contributory grading and on an interim basis as a consequence of Amendment C355melb. This change in grading appears to have been influenced by correspondence from Melbourne Heritage Action which put forward new information about “Chart House”. It is now proposed, as a consequence of Amendment C365melb, to include No. -
Academy of Music; Academy of Music_____ and Or Common Academy of Music______2
NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) 0MB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_________________ 1. Name___________________ historic______American Academy of Music; Academy of Music_____ and or common Academy of Music_______________________ 2. Location_________________ street & number 232-46 South Broad Street at SW., corner Locust Street not for publication Philadelphia city, town vicinity of P ennsylvania 42 county Philadelphia state code CO 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum _ K- building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition, Accessible X entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government scientific being considered - yes: unrestricted __ industrial transportation .... no military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name Philadelphia Orchestra Association street & number 232-46 South Broad Street city, town Philadelphia vicinity of state Pennslyvania 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Philadelphia City Hall street & number Broad and Market Streets city, town Philadelphia state Pennsylvania 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Historic American Buildings Survey has this property been determined eligible? yes no date 1957, 1963, 1965, 1967 JL federal state county local depository for survey records W ashing ton, D C city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered ^ original site good ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Interior Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance This free standing brick Renaissance Revival Style building exhibits a free use of classical forms. -
Architecture Creating Connections Recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist
Architecture creating connections recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist The best of Victoria’s architecture, showcasing the immense value architects add when embedded end to end in a project, has been revealed with the release today of the 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist. The awards program, run by the Victorian Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects, features a shortlist recognising architecture in the public realm, residential sector, regional areas, embedded sustainability and much more. Spread across 14 categories, 108 entries have made the shortlist which encompasses 76 individual projects. Victorian Chapter President Amy Muir says the shortlisted projects define the significant role that quality built outcomes have in creating sustainable, resilient buildings that can endure for generations. The selected projects go beyond the parameters of the brief to deliver compelling results. ‘This year’s shortlisted projects are exemplars of the outcomes that can be achieved when architects are engaged in the entire process, resulting in a strong collaboration between client, consultants and contracted builders,’ said Ms Muir. ‘These projects are leading examples of how architects elevate quality through carefully considered outcomes in the building process. The selected projects create a lasting legacy that enable architecture to be accessed more broadly throughout the community. ‘During these strange times we are thrilled to celebrate architecture that continues to challenge the status quo. In -
Jeff Copolov CV.Pdf
BATES SMART CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION SYNOPSIS / Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology After graduating from RMIT University with Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design a Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design, Jeff began his career as a set designer in the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS television industry. He joined Bates Smart / Member of the Design Institute of Australia in 1983 and in 1995 he became the first / Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia director of interior design at Bates Smart. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE During his career Jeff has been awarded a number of prestigious accolades. In 2003 he Jeffery joined Bates Smart in 1983, received the IDEA Gold Medal for significant becoming an Associate in 1985, an contributions to the design industry and in Associate Director in 1988 and a 2010 he was awarded Designer of the Year Director in 1995. at the IDEA awards. He was inducted into JEFFERY COPOLOV Prior to joining Bates Smart: the Design Institute of Australia’s Hall of DipIntDes, FDIA / ABC Channel 2, Melbourne Fame in 2018, in recognition of outstanding Director / GTV Channel 9, Melbourne contributions to the Australian design industry. Jeff has a classically modern, timeless approach to design and a reputation for producing highly refined and carefully targeted design solutions. He is known for his relentless attention to detail. Regularly working with architectural colleagues from the outset, Jeff oversees the entire design process to craft buildings from the inside out. His broad experience covers a wide range of building types, including commercial, hospitality, residential, retail, education and health, all of which promotes a rich diversity of cross-discipline thought. -
Current Job Opportunity Job Title Receptionist Date
Bates Smart Pty Ltd Sydney 43 Brisbane Street Melbourne 1 Nicholson Street ABN 70 004 999 400 Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia T+612 8354 5100 F+612 8354 5199 T+613 8664 6200 F+613 8664 6300 [email protected] [email protected] www.batessmart.com Current Job Opportunity Architecture Interior Design Job Title Receptionist Date Posted 21 January 2020 Urban Design Strategy Location Sydney Reference Code WP/Receptionist Employment Type Full-Time (8:00am-5:00pm) Salary Range $48,000-$55,000 + super Job Description Bates Smart seeks a talented candidate to join our Administration team in Sydney. The successful candidate will have excellent communication skills and have demonstrated the ability to provide excellent customer service or have experience working within a similar role in a corporate environment. As the Receptionist, you will be the first point of contact for all internal and external stakeholders across the business. The Receptionist is responsible for answering all incoming calls and front desk tasks and assisting the EA’s and Events Coordinator with general administration tasks and ensuring the general day-to-day smooth running of all staff amenities. Responsibilities Reception / Brand ambassador for Bates Smart. / Ownership and pride in reception area, maintain high level of presentation. / Receive and transfer all incoming calls. / Meet and greet all visitors and inform staff of arrival. / Open, sort and stamp post and distribute to staff/prepare outgoing post (including international and domestic couriers). / Coordinate and order catering for meetings with upon EA’s instruction. / Reconcile supplier invoices (taxi, courier, flowers etc) / Maintain Cab charge register and monitor usage. -
Victorian Architecture Awards — 2019
Victorian Architecture Awards — 2019 Shortlist Shortlisted projects are listed in alphabetical order by practice name Residential Architecture - Houses (New) Farmer Street | MAArchitects 37 entries / 13 shortlisted projects Clyde Mews | Six Degrees Architects Hawke & King | Six Degrees Architects St Andrews Beach House | Austin Maynard Architects Residential Architecture - Multiple Housing Jury Hawthorn House | Edition Office Richard Middleton (Chair) | HASSELL Bonnie Herring | Breathe Architecture Point Lonsdale House | Edition Office Jesse Linardi | DKO Architecture Ballarat House | Eldridge Anderson Sandy Point House | Kennedy Nolan Residential Architecture - Houses Fitzroy Lane | Kennedy Nolan (Alterations and Additions) Canopy House | Leeton Pointon Architects 35 entries / 14 shortlisted projects & Interiors Springhill House | Lovell Burton South Yarra House | AM Architecture Architecture Cascade House | Atelier Red+Black North Melbourne House | NMBW Grant House | Austin Maynard Architects Architecture Studio Brick & Gable House | Breathe Architecture Daylesford Longhouse | Partners Hill 182 Rose | Fieldwork Bluff House | Rob Kennon Architects LIGHT CORRIDOR HOUSE | Figr House in the Hills | Sean Godsell Architects Storybook House | Folk Architects Cornerstone House | Splinter Society York St Residence | Jackson Clements Architecture Burrows Architects Caroline House | Kennedy Nolan Residential Architecture - Houses (New) Jury Rodney Eggleston (Chair) | March Studio Oak House | Kennedy Nolan Andrew Simpson | Andrew Simpson Architects -
Melbourne's Legal Precinct
General Melbourne’s legal precinct A guide to the institutions that make up Melbourne’s legal precinct This publication highlights key legal institutions of direct interest to students, the general public and those working in the legal system. It also indicates which buildings are open to the public or offer tours for visitors. Please note that some buildings restrict the number of visitors and the areas you may visit. Others are only open to the public during Law Week in May. Members of the public can attend court hearings, except in very rare circumstances; however, be aware that all courts have security screening arrangements and do not allow photography inside their buildings. Tours of the Supreme Court of Victoria and County Court of Victoria for VCE Legal Studies students are available. To book, email [email protected]. Students can also tour the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court. To book, email [email protected]. For information about Law Week, visit www.lawweek.net.au. For information about Victoria Law Foundation’s school programs, and teacher resources, visit www.victorialawfoundation.org.au. www.Find out more at... victorialaw foundation. org.au Historic buildings Russell Street Melbourne 01 Justice Museum 377 Russell Street, Melbourne The new Russell Street Melbourne Justice Museum, developed by the National Trust, integrates three heritage buildings in the heart of Melbourne’s original legal precinct. These buildings include the Old Melbourne Gaol, the former Magistrates’ Court and the former City Watch House. The museum provides visitors with a contemporary experience through which today’s legal systems, justice networks, laws, courts and prisons can be better understood (entry fee applies). -
Ned Kelly's Last Words: “Ah, Well, I Suppose”
Ned Kelly’s Last Words: “Ah, Well, I Suppose” Dr. Stuart E. Dawson ∗ (Monash University) Abstract: It has long been widely, even admiringly, held that Ned Kelly’s last words before execution were “Such is life”. This is a key part of a prevalent Kelly mythology that has been subject to little serious critique. Yet the attribution of the phrase ‘Such is life’ to Kelly is pure fiction. Analysis of the reportage of the day reveals Kelly’s actual last words, and explains how they were transmuted by one journalist into the catchy expression quoted as fact by many historians. It shows that the image of Kelly standing tall and defiant, saying ‘Such is life’ as the rope was placed around his neck, is nothing but a highly romanticised myth. In fact, Kelly came to an ignominious, mumbling end on the scaffold, a far cry from popular legend. Keywords: Ned Kelly, Edward Kelly, Kelly Gang, Ned Kelly facts, Ned Kelly bushranger, Ned Kelly museum, Old Melbourne Gaol, famous last words. It has long been widely, even admiringly, held that Ned Kelly’s last words before execution were “Such is life”. 1 To television producer, Paul Terry, “the fatalistic and courageous ‘Such is life’ has become synonymous with Ned and everything he stood for”. 2 The claim has been relayed in Australian history texts and is commonly taught as fact to school children. 3 In Peter Carey’s Booker Prize-winning novel True History of the ∗ I wish to thank Sharon Hollingsworth for her valuable input and detailed discussion throughout the writing of this article, and Caroline Oxley of the Victoria Police Museum for copies of several historic documents. -
State Library of Victoria 328 Swanston Street, Melbourne Conservation
State Library of Victoria 328 Swanston Street, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan – Volume 1 State Library of Victoria Complex 328 Swanston Street, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan Volume 1: Conservation Analysis and Policy Prepared for the State Library of Victoria February 2011 Date Document status Prepared by April 2009 Final draft Lovell Chen October 2010 Wheeler Centre component Lovell Chen update issued February 2011 Final report Lovell Chen TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF FIGURES iii LIST OF TABLES vii CONSULTANTS viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Brief 1 1.2 Report Structure and Format 1 1.3 Location 2 1.4 Heritage Listings and Statutory Controls 4 1.5 Terminology 5 2.0 HISTORY 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 The Public Library 7 2.3 The Intercolonial Exhibition 21 2.4 The National Gallery 27 2.5 The Industrial and Technological Museum 33 2.6 The Natural History Museum 37 2.7 Relocation of the Museum and the State Library Master Plan 41 3.0 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS 45 3.1 Introduction 45 3.2 Stages of Construction 46 3.3 Construction types and detailing 72 3.4 Survey of Building Fabric and Room Data Sheets 77 3.5 Services 82 4.0 INVESTIGATION OF DECORATIVE FINISHES 83 4.1 Methodology 83 4.2 Review Comment 83 4.3 1985 Investigation Results 83 4.4 The Decorative Schemes 93 5.0 FURNITURE SURVEY 95 5.1 Introduction and Overview 95 5.2 Summary of 1985 Survey Results 95 5.3 Current Furniture Holdings 96 6.0 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 99 6.1 Introduction and Overview -
Lynette Russell – 'An Unpicturesque Vagrant': Aboriginal Victorians at The
Lynette Russell ‘An unpicturesque vagrant’: Aboriginal Victorians at the Melbourne International Exhibition 1880–1881* THE GRAND DAME of Melbourne architecture, the Royal Exhibition Building was the first non-Aboriginal cultural site in Australia awarded UNESCO World Heritage listing. In 2004, in Suzhou China, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee announced that the Royal Exhibition Building and surrounding Carlton Gardens qualified under cultural criterion (ii) of the Operational Guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Criterion (ii) lists sites that exhibit ‘an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design’.1 The Royal Exhibition Building does, however, have links to the Aboriginal community of Melbourne beyond being constructed on Kulin land. Contemporary Kulin connections are intensified by the proximity to the Melbourne Museum and Bunjilaka Aboriginal Cultural Centre. This article considers some evidence of Aboriginal presence at the Exhibition building during the Melbourne International Exhibition of 1880-81. The Exhibition building was famously built to house the Melbourne International Exhibition of 1880-81. Designed by architect Joseph Reed, the building was heralded as a magnificent achievement – indeed it was monumental, with its dome the tallest construction in the city. As Graeme Davison illustrated in his seminal study Marvellous Melbourne, our metropolis was, in the 1880s, a boom city; the International exhibition was to be a celebration of the city’s economic success, its technological and industrial achievements and all that was marvellous.2 The newspapers and magazines carried articles that exulted the enthusiasm and energy of the city along with the incredible optimism that characterised the 1880s boom. -
2012 Victorian Architecture Awards | Architectureau 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards
2017515 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards | ArchitectureAU 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards Awards | Words Shelley Penn The Royal Children’s Hospital by Billard Leece Partnership and Bates Smart. Image: John Gollings The 2012 Victorian Architecture Awards were announced at a presentation dinner on 29 June, held at Crown Palladium in Melbourne. Jury comment The 2012 Victorian state awards program has seen a dramatic rise in the number of entries from previous years. The years 2010 and 2011 saw about a 1 percent growth, yet this year there was a 21 percent increase — we received a total of 235 entries. Significant jumps in the categories of Heritage, Residential Alterations and Additions, Residential Multiple and Urban Design were somewhat countered by lowered numbers in Commercial and New Public Architecture — a sign of the times perhaps. Despite economic uncertainty, however, Victorian architects are continuing to deliver outstanding work. Together, the fiftyseven awards and commendations hint, through their breadth and exceptional quality, at the enormous scope of architecture’s contribution to Victorian society and culture. Each entry, from the smallest private intervention to the larger civic projects, reveals the generosity of spirit, innovation and tenacity that underpin excellent architecture. All of the architects who entered projects, who put their work under the glare of peer evaluation and thereby gave us all a glimpse of the great things underway in Victorian architecture, are sincerely thanked. I also thank the jurors, who have contributed substantially to this year’s awards through their time and rigorous consideration — a contribution that is essential to the credibility and distinction that characterize the Institute’s awards programs.