Melbourne's Legal Precinct
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ned Kelly's Last Words: “Ah, Well, I Suppose”
Ned Kelly’s Last Words: “Ah, Well, I Suppose” Dr. Stuart E. Dawson ∗ (Monash University) Abstract: It has long been widely, even admiringly, held that Ned Kelly’s last words before execution were “Such is life”. This is a key part of a prevalent Kelly mythology that has been subject to little serious critique. Yet the attribution of the phrase ‘Such is life’ to Kelly is pure fiction. Analysis of the reportage of the day reveals Kelly’s actual last words, and explains how they were transmuted by one journalist into the catchy expression quoted as fact by many historians. It shows that the image of Kelly standing tall and defiant, saying ‘Such is life’ as the rope was placed around his neck, is nothing but a highly romanticised myth. In fact, Kelly came to an ignominious, mumbling end on the scaffold, a far cry from popular legend. Keywords: Ned Kelly, Edward Kelly, Kelly Gang, Ned Kelly facts, Ned Kelly bushranger, Ned Kelly museum, Old Melbourne Gaol, famous last words. It has long been widely, even admiringly, held that Ned Kelly’s last words before execution were “Such is life”. 1 To television producer, Paul Terry, “the fatalistic and courageous ‘Such is life’ has become synonymous with Ned and everything he stood for”. 2 The claim has been relayed in Australian history texts and is commonly taught as fact to school children. 3 In Peter Carey’s Booker Prize-winning novel True History of the ∗ I wish to thank Sharon Hollingsworth for her valuable input and detailed discussion throughout the writing of this article, and Caroline Oxley of the Victoria Police Museum for copies of several historic documents. -
Behind the Scenes
©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 350 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to postal submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. AUTHOR THANKS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Climate map data adapted from Peel MC, Anthony Ham Finlayson BL & McMahon TA (2007) ‘Updated Thanks to Maryanne Netto for sending me World Map of the Köppen-Geiger Climate to such wonderful places – your legacy will Classification’, Hydrology and Earth System endure. To co-authors Trent and Kate who Sciences, 11, 163344. brought such excellence to the book. To David Andrew for so many wise wildlife tips. And to Cover photograph: Loch Ard Gorge, Port every person whom I met along the road – Campbell National Park, David South/Alamy. -
Emotion, Affect and Registers of Engagement at Heritage Sites
Registers of Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites: The Affective Performances of Visiting Laurajane Smith Australian National University Australia (2010-13) USA (2011-12) • Stockman’s Hall of Fame • Cowboy Hall of Fame • Immigration Museum, Melbourne • James Madison’s Montpelier • Old Melbourne Gaol • The Hermitage • Mt Kembla Heritage centre • Ellis Island • National Museum of Australia • Tenement Museum – First Australians Gallery • Japanese American National • Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park History Museum • National War Memorial • Nordic Heritage Museum • M.A.D.E., Ballarat • Mashantucket Pequot Museum • Lanyon Homestead • Yellowstone NP • Vaucluse House • Civil Rights Museum, Memphis • Rouse Hill Farm • Industry and Labor, Youngstown • Museum of Work and Culture • Rivers of Steel England (2004, 2007-9) • National Museum of American • 9 Country Houses/Stately Homes History (Smithsonian): • 8 Museums with exhibitions on – Star Spangled Banner the British Slave Trade (including – Price of Freedom British Museum; International Slavey Museum Liverpool; – Paradox of Freedom (Jefferson National Maritime Museum) and Slavery) • National Coal Mining Museum • Tolpuddle Martyrs’ Museum • Beamish Open Air Museum • What does the word ‘heritage’ mean to you? • What meaning, if any, does an exhibition like this have for • Whose history are you visiting here? contemporary Australia? • Are you part of the history • Is there anything you've represented here? seen/read/heard today that has changed your views about the past • How does it make you -
Activities 01/09/2015 (Aka Spring!)
ACTIVITIES 01/09/2015 (AKA SPRING!) Cheery ‘Hello’s’ to all. At last, the coldest Victorian winter in 26 years has finally said goodbye and quietly crept away, ashamed of his ghastly greyness, as well as his short, cold, wet and windy days and, as for his freezing mornings: BOO! Hooray that he won’t return for nine whole months, yippee, skippee! Now, beautiful Spring has arrived, with her blossoms, buds and thoughts of ‘Springy’ things. Perhaps a good old IOE Spring Clean is in the air! Despite the cold, I would also like to make mention of the joy we have had over these cold months, when staff members have proudly brought in their divinely beautiful new babies for us to coo over. We wish all these families the very best with these little bubs, especially the best of health for them all. AND PS: I think it would be a wonderful idea if the next IOE BBQ was held on a Monday or Tuesday, when I am here. How I love a sausage sizzle! (Just saying, Marcelo!) Kindest regards, Toni MOOROOLBARK MINIATURE RAILWAY Why? For the simple pleasure of riding a miniature train in a lovely garden setting When: Fourth Sunday of every month (except December) Phone: (03) 9723 1025 Website: mmr.org.au/wordpress Where: Kiloran Reserve, Hawthory Road, Mooroolbark, Victoria, 3138 Cost: $2.50 per ride; bulk tickets available for group bookings and birthday parties CONCORDIA, MANDOLIN & GUITAR ORCHESTRA CONCERT When: Sunday 6 September at 2.30pm Website: concordiamandolins.org.au Where: St Johns Southgate, 20 City Road, Southbank Cost: $25, $20 pre-purchased, Children -
Appendix 1 Citations for Proposed New Precinct Heritage Overlays
Southbank and Fishermans Bend Heritage Review Appendix 1 Citations for proposed new precinct heritage overlays © Biosis 2017 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 183 Southbank and Fishermans Bend Heritage Review A1.1 City Road industrial and warehouse precinct Place Name: City Road industrial and warehouse Heritage Overlay: HO precinct Address: City Road, Queens Bridge Street, Southbank Constructed: 1880s-1930s Heritage precinct overlay: Proposed Integrity: Good Heritage overlay(s): Proposed Condition: Good Proposed grading: Significant precinct Significance: Historic, Aesthetic, Social Thematic Victoria’s framework of historical 5.3 – Marketing and retailing, 5.2 – Developing a Context: themes manufacturing capacity City of Melbourne thematic 5.3 – Developing a large, city-based economy, 5.5 – Building a environmental history manufacturing industry History The south bank of the Yarra River developed as a shipping and commercial area from the 1840s, although only scattered buildings existed prior to the later 19th century. Queens Bridge Street (originally called Moray Street North, along with City Road, provided the main access into South and Port Melbourne from the city when the only bridges available for foot and wheel traffic were the Princes the Falls bridges. The Kearney map of 1855 shows land north of City Road (then Sandridge Road) as poorly-drained and avoided on account of its flood-prone nature. To the immediate south was Emerald Hill. The Port Melbourne railway crossed the river at The Falls and ran north of City Road. By the time of Commander Cox’s 1866 map, some industrial premises were located on the Yarra River bank and walking tracks connected them with the Sandridge Road and Emerald Hill. -
Assessment of Victoria's Coastal Reserves Draft Report
Assessment of Victoria’s Coastal Reserves Draft Report For Public Comment October 2019 Victorian Environmental Assessment Council The Victorian Environmental Assessment Council (VEAC) was established in 2001 under the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council Act 2001. It provides the State Government of Victoria with independent advice on protection and management of the environment and natural resources of public land. The five Council members are: Ms Janine Haddow (Chairperson) Ms Joanne Duncan Ms Anna Kilborn Dr Charles Meredith Dr Geoffrey Wescott Acknowledgement of Aboriginal Victorians The Victorian Environmental Assessment Council pays its respects to Victoria’s Aboriginal peoples, Native Title Holders and Traditional Owners and acknowledges their rich cultural and intrinsic connections to Country. Council recognises that the land and sea is of spiritual, cultural, environmental and economic importance to Aboriginal people and values their contribution and interest in the management of land and sea. Written submissions are invited on this draft report. The closing date for submissions is Monday 11 November 2019. You may make an online submission via VEAC’s website at www. veac.vic.gov.au or send your written submission by post or by email (see contact details). There is no required format for submissions, except that you must provide your name, address and your contact details, including an email address if you have one. All submissions will be treated as public documents and will be published on VEAC’s website. Please contact VEAC if you do not wish your submission to be published. The name of each submitter will be identified as part of each published submission, but personal contact details will be removed before publishing. -
National Trust of Australia (Victoria)
National Trust of Australia (Victoria) Submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Heritage Tourism and Eco Tourism August 2013 1 We welcome the opportunity to make a submission to the Parliamentary Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into Heritage Tourism and Eco Tourism. In addition to this submission, The National Trust would welcome the opportunity of being heard by the Committee in order to provide greater detail on heritage tourism and answer any questions on the Trust’s submission. For the purposes of this submission, the term ‘heritage’ for the National Trust, covers all that we, as a society, value today and wish to pass on to future generations. This is a very broad definition of ‘heritage’, and deliberately so. Its scope is much broader than ‘place’. It includes intangible as well as tangible heritage—language and customs, as well as places and moveable collections. ‘Heritage Tourism’ for the National Trust covers visitation to places that have historic, Indigenous and natural values, their associated collections (including documentary collections), and the settings in which places are located. Summary; The National Trust manages 24 heritage tourism attractions across Victoria Over 400,000 Melbourne, interstate and international people visit a National Trust Property in Victoria each year Heritage tourism provides employment for 118 people full-time, part-time or casually within the Trust and 1,400 volunteers actively contribute 50,000 hours p.a. to the success of our business Heritage and culture are one -
2021 Midsumma Festival Planner
2021 Midsumma Festival Planner APRIL MAY Last updated: 16 March 2021 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Sun Category MP Event Venue Pre 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 23 Post 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 23 Performance .CHURCH. The Toff in Town 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 8pm 9pm 9pm 7pm + Performance #Really?! with Mel & Peppy Vau d'vile - House of Love 9pm Performance 4PLAY Pride of our Footscray Community Bar 9.30pm 7.30pm 9.30pm 7.30pm Music MP A Celebration of The Teaches of Peaches The Curtin 8pm Community A Festive Mass St Mark's Anglican Church Fitzroy 7pm Parties/Social A Gay On The Lawn St Kilda Sports Club 1pm Performance A Night With Tina Chasers 7pm 7pm 7pm Visual Arts MP A Strange Space Collingwood Yards 6pm 6pm 6pm 6pm Performance Absolutely FEMMEulous Digital Event 6pm Music Ace of Hearts - Songs Bluestone Church Arts Space 6.30pm 6.30pm 6.30pm 6.30pm Parties/Social ADAM + LUST Inflation 7pm 7pm Performance After Dark Chasers 3pm 7pm 7pm Performance All Out Of Pride Gasworks Arts Park - Gasworks Theatre 8.30pm Performance All The King's Hens Comedy Republic 7.30pm Film Alone Together Digital Event ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● 7pm 7pm 5pm+ Performance Ballads & Ballgowns Vau d'vile - Showroom 8pm Becoming Us talk with Nevo Zisin, Adolfo 3:15pm TT&W MP Immigration Museum Aranjuez, Frances Cannon + Jax Jacki Brown Visual Arts Becoming You: An Incomplete Guide exhibition Immigration Museum 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am 10am Bending -
Designing the Courtroom of the Future
Designing the Courtroom of the Future Paper delivered at the International Conference on Court Excellence 27–29 January 2016 Singapore Robert McDougall* Introduction 1 In Franz Kafka’s The Trial, a bewildered protagonist known simply as ‘K’ struggles to navigate the mysterious judicial system of a state under the laws of which he is alleged to have committed an unspecified offence. As the story unfolds, K becomes increasingly unsettled and desperate. Each encounter with the maze of tribunals, courtrooms, public galleries and private offices confounds and disorients him: It was not so much finding court offices even here that shocked K, he was mainly shocked at himself, at his own naïvety in court matters. It seemed to him that one of the most basic rules governing how a defendant should behave was always to be prepared, never allow surprises, never to look, unsuspecting, to the right when the judge stood beside him to his left – and this was the very basic rule that he was continually violating. A long corridor extended in front of him, air blew in from it which, compared with the air in the studio, was refreshing. There were benches set along each side of the corridor just as in the waiting area for the office he went to himself. There seemed to be precise rules governing how offices should be equipped.1 2 For the distinguished members of this audience it might be difficult now to recall a time when you, too, experienced the unsettling sensation of being overwhelmed by the legal system’s complexity. However it must not be forgotten that for many users of the court system today, Kafka’s depiction would not be too far off the mark. -
Fortress Or Sanctuary Report
FORTRESS OR SANCTUARY? ENHANCING COURT SAFETY BY MANAGING PEOPLE, PLACES AND PROCESSES REPORT ON STUDY FUNDED BY AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL, LINKAGE PROJECT, LP0882179 SEPTEMBER 2014 1 SUPREME Court OF Victoria Watercolour: Noëlle Herrenschmidt COMMONWealth LAW courts, MELBOURNE (FRONT COVER) Architect: Paul Katsieris, HASSELL Watercolour: Noëlle Herrenschmidt 2 RESEARCHERS PROJECT PARTNERS Prof David Tait, University of Western Sydney Western Australian Dept of the Attorney General Prof Prasuna Reddy, University of Newcastle Family Court of Australia and Federal Circuit Court of Prof Graham Brawn, University of Melbourne Australia Prof Warwick Sarre, University of South Australia Magistrates’ Court of Victoria Prof Debra Rickwood, University of Canberra South Australia Courts Administration Authority Prof Deborah Blackman, University of NSW MyriaD Consultants A/Prof Gregory Missingham, University of Melbourne PTW Architects Prof Anne Wallace, Edith Cowan Univserity Connley Walker Pty Ltd Professor Kate Auty, University of Melbourne Lyons Architects A/Prof Alice Richardson, University of Canberra And subsequently: New Zealand Ministry of Justice RESEARCH TEAM INCLUDED: PHOTOGRAPHS FEATURED ARE COPYRIGHT ©: Dr Emma Rowden Diane Jones, PTW Architects Dr Alikki Vernon Frank Greene, FAIA, CGL Ricci Greene Associates. Vivienne Topp Jay Farbstein, PhD FAIA, Jay Farbstein & Associates. Tess Simson Wayne Martin AC OR, Chief Justice of Western Australia Mira Taitz Ray Warnes, Executive Director, Court and Tribunal Imogen Beynon Service, Department of the Attorney General, Western Mythily Meher Australia Melissa Spencer Paul Katsieris, Katsieris Origami Dr Emma Rowden Jean-Paul Miroglio Tess Simson John Kirk-Anderson, Fairfax NZ Mark Forth, Mark Forth & Associates Kawai Yeung Scott Wojan Layout by Madeleine Rowe 3 OVERVIEW OF THE REPORT Chapter One provides an introduction, background to the issues, theoretical framework and review of the historical and policy context. -
Judicial Impartiality
CONSULTATION PAPER AND BACKGROUND PAPERS JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY APRIL 2021 The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) was established on 1 January 1975 and operates in accordance with the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 4, Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building, 119 North Quay, Brisbane QLD 4000. Postal Address: PO Box 12953, George Street QLD 4003 Telephone: within Australia (07) 3248 1224 International: +61 7 3248 1224 Email: [email protected] Website: www.alrc.gov.au CONTENTS Judicial Impartiality Consultation Paper i The Law on Judicial Bias: A Primer JI1-1 Recusal and Self-Disqualification JI2-1 The Federal Judiciary – the Inquiry in Context JI3-1 Conceptions of Judicial Impartiality in Theory and Practice JI4-1 Ethics, Professional Development, and Accountability JI5-1 Cognitive and Social Biases in Judicial Decision-Making JI6-1 The Fair-Minded Observer and its Critics JI7-1 CONSULTATION PAPER JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY APRIL 2021 This Consultation Paper reflects the law as at 30 April 2021. The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) was established on 1 January 1975 and operates in accordance with the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). ALRC publications are available to view or download free of charge on the ALRC website: www.alrc.gov.au/publications. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. ISBN: 978-0-6482087-9-2 Citation: Australian Law Reform Commission, Judicial Impartiality: Consultation Paper (CP 1, 2021) Commission Reference: ALRC Consultation Paper 1, 2021 © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. -
The Russell Street Police Garage Burials
AUSTRALASIAN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 22, 2004 Identification and Historical Truth: The Russell Street Police Garage Burials GEOFF HEWITT AND RICHARD WRIGHT An intact human burial, together with a disturbed grave containing the partial remains of two further individuals, was found at the site of the former Russell Street Police Garage, Melbourne. The remains were located during an archaeological watching brief required as a condition of a permit issued by Heritage Victoria relating to redevelopment of the site. Before 1924, the Police Garage site had included the yard of the Melbourne Gaol men’s hospital. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the bodies of numerous executed criminals had been buried within the gaol grounds. Documentary research has been combined with osteological analysis of the skeletal remains with the aim of identification. Many burials were exhumed from the former Melbourne Gaol in 1929 and further exhumations were performed during 1937 when the Police Garage was constructed. Unfortunately, the exhumations in the past were somewhat chaotic and contemporary documentation of the exhumations and reburials is unreliable. Some key records contradict the physical evidence and, as a result, it is not possible to achieve a forensic standard of identification. The former Police Garage site in Russell Street Melbourne, removal of upwards of 1000 cubic metres of contaminated fill cited as No. 912 on the Heritage Council Victoria Register, from the site, an intact human burial was discovered, together was the subject of a watching brief conducted by the La Trobe with the remains of a further two individuals whose graves University Archaeology Program on behalf of Royal had been incompletely exhumed in 1937.