DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Report on the Review of the Monthly Performance Reports and the Associated Incentive Plan Payment Reports Filed by Verizon New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Report on the Review of the Monthly Performance Reports and the Associated Incentive Plan Payment Reports Filed by Verizon New Jersey Draft Report on the Review of the Monthly Performance Reports and the Associated Incentive Plan Payment Reports Filed by Verizon New Jersey Presented to: Division of Telecommunication New Jersey Board of Public Utilities By: 65 Main Street Quentin, Pennsylvania 17083 (717) 270-4500 (voice) (717) 270-0555 (facsimile) [email protected] (e-mail) June 7, 2003 Draft Report – Review of Verizon-NJ’s Performance and IP Reports Table of Contents I. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 A. Purpose of the Review ............................................................................................ 1 B. Overview of Verizon-NJ Performance Measures and Incentive Plan .................... 3 C. CLEC Input............................................................................................................. 6 D. Liberty’s Review Methods...................................................................................... 8 E. Overall Conclusions................................................................................................ 9 II. Reporting, Incentive Plan, and Systems Evaluation ......................................................... 16 A. Performance Reporting......................................................................................... 16 B. Incentive Plan (IP) ................................................................................................ 19 C. Systems Evaluation............................................................................................... 30 D. Metrics Change Control........................................................................................ 42 III. Pre-Ordering Performance Measures................................................................................ 48 A. General Background and Summary of Findings................................................... 48 B. PO-1, Response Time OSS Pre-Ordering Interface.............................................. 48 C. PO-2, OSS Interface Availability ......................................................................... 52 D. PO-3, Contact Center Availability........................................................................ 58 E. PO-4, Timeliness of Change Management ........................................................... 62 F. PO-5, Average Notification of Interface Outage .................................................. 67 G. PO-6, Software Validation.................................................................................... 71 H. PO-7, Software Problem Resolution Timeliness .................................................. 73 I. PO-8, Manual Loop Qualification ........................................................................ 79 IV. Ordering Performance Measures...................................................................................... 82 A. Background Information and Summary of Findings ............................................ 82 B. OR-1, Order Confirmation Timeliness ................................................................. 93 C. OR-2, Reject Timeliness..................................................................................... 111 D. OR-3, Percent Rejects......................................................................................... 124 E. OR-4, Timeliness of Completion Notifications.................................................. 125 F. OR-5, Percent Flow-Through ............................................................................. 146 G. OR-6, Order Accuracy........................................................................................ 152 H. OR-7, Percent Order Confirmations/Rejects Sent Within Three Business Days 160 I. OR-8, Acknowledgement Timeliness................................................................. 164 J. OR-9, Order Acknowledgement Completeness.................................................. 166 V. Provisioning Performance Measures .............................................................................. 170 A. Background Information and Summary of Findings .......................................... 170 B. PR-1, Average Interval Offered.......................................................................... 188 C. PR-2, Average Interval Completed..................................................................... 198 D. PR-3, Completed within Specified Number of Days (1-5 Lines)....................... 205 E. Findings and Recommendations, PR-1 through PR-3 ........................................ 209 F. PR-4, Missed Appointments ............................................................................... 212 G. PR-5, Facility Missed Orders.............................................................................. 224 H. Findings and Recommendations for PR-4 and PR-5 .......................................... 227 I. PR-6, Installation Quality ................................................................................... 229 J. PR-7, Jeopardy Reports ...................................................................................... 233 K. PR-8, Open Orders in a Hold Status ................................................................... 235 Page i Draft Report – Review of Verizon-NJ’s Performance and IP Reports L. PR-9, Hot Cut Loops .......................................................................................... 238 VI. Maintenance and Repair (M&R) Performance Measures............................................... 249 A. General Background and Summary of Findings................................................. 249 B. MR-1, Response Time OSS Maintenance Interface........................................... 250 C. MR-2, Trouble Report Rate ................................................................................ 259 D. MR-3, Missed Repair Appointments .................................................................. 267 E. MR-4, Trouble Duration Intervals ...................................................................... 270 F. MR-5, Repeat Trouble Reports........................................................................... 274 G. Findings and Recommendations, MR-2 through MR-5 ..................................... 276 VII. Network Performance Measures..................................................................................... 278 A. General Background........................................................................................... 278 B. NP-1, Percent Final Trunk Group Blockage....................................................... 278 C. NP-2, Collocation Performance.......................................................................... 284 D. NP-5, Network Outage Notification ................................................................... 294 E. NP-6, NXX Updates........................................................................................... 297 VIII. Billing Performance Measures........................................................................................ 300 A. General Background and Summary of Findings................................................. 300 B. BI-1, Timeliness of Daily Usage Feed (DUF).................................................... 303 C. BI-2, Timeliness of Carrier Bill.......................................................................... 306 D. BI-3, Billing Accuracy........................................................................................ 310 E. BI-4, DUF Accuracy........................................................................................... 315 F. BI-5, Accuracy of Mechanized Bill Feed ........................................................... 318 G. BI-6, Completeness of Usage Charges ............................................................... 320 H. BI-7, Completeness of Fractional Recurring Charges ........................................ 323 I. BI-8, Non-Recurring Charge Completeness....................................................... 325 J. Findings and Recommendations......................................................................... 327 IX. Operator Services, Databases, and General Performance Measures .............................. 330 A. General Background........................................................................................... 330 B. OD-1, Operator Services – Speed of Answer ..................................................... 330 C. OD-2, LIDB, Routing and OS/DA Platform ...................................................... 332 D. OD-3, Directory Assistance Database Update Accuracy ................................... 332 E. GE-1, Directory Listing Verification Reports .................................................... 334 F. GE-2, Poles, Ducts, Conduits, and Rights-of-Way............................................. 336 G. GE-3, Bona Fide Request (BFR) Responses ...................................................... 337 H. Findings and Recommendations......................................................................... 339 Page ii Draft Report – Review of Verizon-NJ’s Performance and IP Reports I. Introduction A. Purpose of the Review Performance measures or metrics and incentive or performance assurance plans play vital roles in monitoring the competitive marketplace. Performance measures in areas such as ordering, provisioning, maintenance and repair, and billing provide a method to correlate an incumbent local exchange carrier’s (ILEC’s) performance between its
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2030 Galt General Plan Existing Conditions Report
    2030 Galt General Plan Existing Conditions Report Final November 2005 With 2008 updates to the Traffic, Fire Protection, and Historic Resources sections Prepared by: ----------------------------------------------- Mintier & Associates RACESTUDIO Environmental Science Associates Applied Development Economics Omni-Means, Inc. Please visit the City’s website for more information on the General Plan Update: www.ci.galt.ca.us City of Galt General Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CREDITS CITY COUNCIL GENERAL PLAN CONSULTANTS Randy D. Shelton, Mayor Mintier Harnish Barbara Payne, Vice Mayor Larry Mintier, FAICP, Principal Andrew Meredith, Councilmember Jim Harnish, JD, Principal Don Haines, Councilmember Dan Amsden, AICP, Project Manager Darryl Clare, Councilmember Tim Raboy, Councilmember (1999-2008) RACESTUDIO Tom Malson, Councilmember (2002-2006) Bruce Race, FAIA, AICP, Principal Environmental Science Associates PLANNING COMMISSION Laurie Warner, Director Ray Weiss, Director Lori Heuer, Chairperson Jessica Mitchell, Associate Mark Yates, Vice Chairperson Lee Ann McFaddin, Commissioner Applied Development Economics Marylou Powers, Commissioner Doug Svensson, Managing Principal Sherry Daley, Commissioner Tony Daysog, Associate Eugene Davenport, Alternate Commissioner Randy Evans, Associate CITY STAFF Omni-Means Marty Inouye, Principal Ted C. Anderson, City Manager Paul Miller, Associate Jason Behrmann, Assistant City Manager Andrew Lee, Traffic Engineer Curt Campion, Community Development Director Gregg Halladay, Director of Public Works Inez
    [Show full text]
  • Vyc Yardsticks
    Yachting Victoria Inc ABN 26 176 852 642 2 / 77 Beach Road SANDRINGHAM VIC 3191 Tel 03 9597 0066 Fax 03 9598 7384 YACHTING VICTORIA YARDSTICKS - 2013-14 Date: 1st Oct 2013 Version: 1.0 INTRODUCTION These yardsticks are prepared to provide the fairest possible calculation of results for mixed fleet racing. New and modified classes appear every year and it is important to gather information and review results as quickly as possible. For dinghy classes there have been no changes to the original Yardsticks published for the 2013/14 season, as results for review have not been forthcoming. In the absence of race results data for dinghy classes and new internationally sourced classes, where there is yardstick data from overseas available, a comparison is made with other international classes to derive an equivalent Yachting Victoria yardstick value. This is explained further down in this document. Fortunately for catamaran classes, there has been significant work done by the Kurnell Catamaran Club in reviewing various catamaran ratings, as well as validating the ratings against the international SCHRS system. This work has now been incorporated into the YV yardsticks for catamaran classes. Much appreciation goes to KCC for this good work. Catamaran yardsticks are now contained in a separate document: “YV - Cat Yardsticks13_14 v1.0” USE OF THE YV YARDSTICKS A club which intends to run a race or event under the Yachting Victoria Yardstick system should include in the Notice of Race and in the Sailing Instructions clauses based on the following: 1 The version of the YV Yardstick System that is to be used in calculating the mixed class fleet racing results.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographe Bay Race Week How to Start
    In the Wind ROYAL PERTH YACHT CLUB NEWSLETTER APRIL 2013 GEOGRAPHE BAY RACE WEEK How to start 13 16 a regatta ALSO Sunsail adventures • The Duyfken returns! Wednesday Sailing • Clean Marine Featuring Bring along the girls for 4 2 Argonaut Mini Series 2013 some fun and a bit of frivolity Geographe Bay Race 4 Week 2013 on what is set to be a great Royal Perth Yacht Club PO Box 5 Nedlands WA 6909 WAIODA State night at the Club. 8 Championships 14 T: (08) 9389 1555 F: (08) 9389 1459 The Duyfken returns! • Get to know the other [email protected] 11 www.rpyc.com.au David Gilmour Ladies at the Club. 8 12 Wins Warren Jones 28 Fremantle Annexe T: (08) 9430 4590 International Youth Match • Enjoy a cocktail on arrival F: (08) 9430 4507 Racing Regatta followed by dinner. Editor Adopt a jetty, beach or Kelly Scott 13 fishing spot and keep the Public Relations Officer Royal Perth Yacht Club marine scene clean T: (08) 9423 5500 E: [email protected] Australia Day 2013 11 14 “In the Wind” is published Sailing adventures to 5 times per year and provides an 16 suit all tastes excellent medium to promote your business to 2000 members and community organisations. Wednesday Sailing To advertise in “In the Wind” 28 please contact the editor at the 40 number above. 40 High Tea Decadence Deadline for the next issue It’s is 7th June 2013. Advertising costs as follows: 1/8 Page 87mm wide x 65mm high $100 incl. GST 1/4 Page 2 87mm wide x 130mm high $195 incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Event : 2016 Cock O'harbour
    Start Race Event : 02/04/2016 0:00:00 4 Places 2016 Cock O'Harbour Time: Laps: Rig Net Time Yard Change Finish Laps Elapsed Net After Boat Name Crew Class Adjust Yard Adjusted Scr Y/S stick to Rig ? Time Yardstick % stick Time For Laps Reduction Business Dave Cullip Nacra 5.8 72.5 In Crew -2 71.05 1:25:00 4 1:25:00 1:25:00 1:59:38 1 4 Time Size F18 751 Nicholas Hord F18 69 Nil 0 69 1:27:03 4 1:27:03 1:27:03 2:06:10 2 7 Lucy & Dean Albert F18 69 Nil 0 69 1:27:36 4 1:27:36 1:27:36 2:06:57 3 8 Nissen Black Label Mark & Gilbert F18 69 Nil 0 69 1:30:00 4 1:30:00 1:30:00 2:10:26 4 10 Shane & Mid Life Kimberley Nacra 5.8 72.5 Nil 0 72.5 1:30:50 4 1:30:50 1:30:50 2:05:17 5 6 Crisis Russell Fart Loop Ned & Yianni F18 69 Nil 0 69 1:33:19 4 1:33:19 1:33:19 2:15:14 6 16 Arran, Greg & ECP 16ft Skiff 85.5 Nil 0 85.5 1:35:59 4 1:35:59 1:35:59 1:52:16 7 1 Emma Niamh & Indigo Roahn Nacra 5.8 72.5 Nil 0 72.5 1:36:34 4 1:36:34 1:36:34 2:13:12 8 14 McAdam Grahame, AJW 16ft Skiff 85.5 Nil 0 85.5 1:38:55 4 1:38:55 1:38:55 1:55:42 9 2 Peter & Mel Tack, Niel, Bad Tack Chris & Force 24 103 Nil 0 103 1:30:27 3 1:30:27 2:00:36 1:57:05 10 3 Richard Maricat Humungus II Mick Colecliffr 92 Nil 0 92 1:31:36 3 1:31:36 2:02:08 2:12:45 11 12 4.3 Sloop Carpe Maricat Phil Johuct 92 Nil 0 92 1:31:37 3 1:31:37 2:02:09 2:12:47 12 13 Cerevisi 4.3 Sloop Maricat Ducatty Chris 92 Nil 0 92 1:32:13 3 1:32:13 2:02:57 2:13:39 13 15 4.3 Sloop Flame Boy Aly & Lydia MG14 106 Nil 0 106 1:37:07 3 1:37:07 2:09:29 2:02:10 14 5 Maricat White Bait Kevin 92 Nil 0 92 1:38:39 3 1:38:39 2:11:32
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Individual Membership Application
    Volume 24, Number 4 April 2014 Lake Michigan SuRF Official Newsmagazine of the Lake Michigan Sail Racing Federation All The News That Fits ... IS YOUR CLUB RUNNING A CHARITY REGATTA? Running a Charity Regatta .......................... 1 THIS IS THE YEAR TO START! WII-FM ................................................................. 1 by Glenn McCarthy LMSRF Adaptive Sailing Update ................ 2 2014 Best on Lake Michigan ....................... 3 At the US Sailing Leadership Youth Learning to Sail ................................... 3 Forum in San Diego, California, Beach Clean Ups ............................................... 3 in January, 2014, ESPN Sailing Man Overboard in Cold Water .................... 3 Commentator and Past US Where Do Your Dues Go? ............................. 5 S.S. Badger .......................................................... 6 Sailing President Gary Jobson Building the Mighty Mac ............................... 6 recommended that every yacht Mackinac Racers, Could This Happen ...... 6 club ought to hold a charity Hiking to North Manitou Light ................... 7 New Board Members ..................................... 7 regatta. I might suggest that Frostbiting News ............................................. 7 one of the nearest and dearest Free PDF Nautical Charts ............................. 7 charities we sailors have is US Sailing Forum-Part II ............................... 8 New Acronyms-STEM & REACH .............. 10 Sailing Schools (that is, if your North Sails Sold .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Annual Report.Indd
    2006 ISAF Annual Report and Financial Statements Contents Part I - Committee Reports 1 President’s Message 3 Secretary General’s Report 5 Constitution Committee 18 Equipment Committee 19 Events Committee 20 2006 ISAF World Sailing Games 22 2006 Volvo Youth Sailing ISAF World Championship 24 ISAF Classes Committee 26 Match Racing Committee 27 Dexia Private Banking ISAF Women’s Match Racing World Championship 2006 29 ISAF Nations Cup 2006 30 Offshore Committee 31 ISAF Offshore Team World Championship 2006 33 Race Officials Committee 34 Racing Rules Committee 36 Regional Games Committee 37 Windsurfing Committee 38 Women’s Sailing Committee 39 Youth and Development Committee 40 2006 ISAF Approved World Champions 42 Part II - Accounts 45 Director’s Report 46 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of International Sailing Federation Limited 47 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account 48 Consolidated Balance Sheet 49 Parent Balance Sheet 50 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 51 Notes to the Financial Statements 52 Part III - 2007 Budget 59 Income 60 Expenditure 60 3 Part I Committee Reports President’s Message There were continents. Most importantly the ISAF Sailing numerous World Cup© will be a real partnership between achievements ISAF, event organizers, sailors, MNAs, classes, of note in 2006, media, sponsors and other stakeholders to many of which are promote the very exciting world of Olympic highlighted in this sailing. Annual Report. Most importantly Reflecting the increased professionalism of the sport of sailing sailing, I have appointed a working party to look continues to at the professional aspects of our sport, and flourish. to consider the services ISAF could provide, whether it be for sailors or event organizers or The world in which others involved in this arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Development and Production Plan FEIS Executive Summary
    Alaska Outer Continental Shelf OCS EIS/EA MMS 2002-020 Liberty Development and Production Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary Beaufort Sea Point Barrow Cape Halkett Harrison Bay LIBERTY PROJECT Colville Delta Barter Island Prudhoe Bay CANADA U.S. Liberty Development and Production Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, OCS EIS/EA, MMS 2002-019, in 4 volumes: Volume I, Executive Summary, Sections I through V, Volume II Sections VI through IX, Bibliography, Index Volume III, Tables, Figures, and Maps for Volumes I and II Volume IV, Appendices The summary is also available as a separate document: Executive Summary, MMS 2002-020. The complete EIS is available on CD-ROM (MMS 2002-019 CD) and on the Internet (http://www.mms.gov/alaska/cproject/liberty/). This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not intended, nor should it be used, as a local planning document by potentially affected communities. The exploration, development and production, and transportation scenarios described in this EIS represent best-estimate assumptions that serve as a basis for identifying characteristic activities and any resulting environmental effects. Several years will elapse before enough is known about potential local details of development to permit estimates suitable for local planning. These assumptions do not represent a Minerals Management Service recommendation, preference, or endorsement of any facility, site, or development plan. Local control of events may be exercised through planning, zoning, land ownership, and applicable State and local laws and regulations. With reference to the extent of the Federal Government’s jurisdiction of the offshore regions, the United States has not yet resolved some of its offshore boundaries with neighboring jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Sail Racing Federation
    Volume 25, Number 2 February 2015 Lake Michigan SuRF Official Newsmagazine of the Lake Michigan Sail Racing Federation 2015 BEST ON LAKE MICHIGAN OFFSHORE SERIES 2015 LMSRF Corporate Members by Gail M. Turluck Broad Reach Sailing Who will be the 2015 Best on Lake Michigan winners? Can Dale Smirl's Copacetic Stores Defiance in Area III PHRF, Bill Hoyer's Majic in Area IV PHRF, Tom Weber's Lake Michigan Performance Beneteau 40.7 La Tempête, Don Draper's Beneteau 36.7 Handicap Racing Fleet Sorcerer, John Moore's J/105 Here's Johnny, and/or Tom Manitowoc Marina Kane's Tartan Ten Honey Badger repeat as champions or National Marine Manufacturers Association will your boat and team dethrone them? Skyway Yacht Works The 2015 Best on Lake Michigan Offshore Championship World Yachts Series is being planned. All offshore racing sailboats anywhere on Lake Michigan are eligible to particpate in this For information on how to become a Corporate Member, email [email protected] series. They do not have to be from the same LMSRF Area. All offshore one-design Classes are welcome. If at least three boats of an offshore UPCOMING MEETINGS one-design Class aren't entered, those that are entered may race in a The LMSRF Adaptive Sailing Committee has set handicapped championship (PHRF definitely, and a possibility of ORR). its next meeting for Saturday, March 28, 2015, at Sheboygan Yacht Club, Sheboygan, Wisconsin. The list of races to be used for the various fleets is being assembled now. No meeting fee. More inside! The fleets and races are going to be determined by the end of February so the Notice of Series may be posted to give racers a clear understanding All The News That Fits ..
    [Show full text]
  • PDF March 05
    March, 2005 PATRON of the Access Dinghy Foundation Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia Volume 6, Issue 2 His Excellency Major General Michael Jeffery AC CVO MC (Retd) Sailability International meets at IFDS YES Conference, Amsterdam During December, IFDS held the Contact Access Dinghy very successful Youth Enabled Sailing Con- ference (YES) in Amsterdam. This was the www.accessdinghy.org first conference of its type with 120 dele- [email protected] gates, representing 33 countries attending. Delegates participated in a busy two day schedule of workshops, presentations, and browsed through a very comprehensive exhibition of boats, equipment and displays. In this Issue This was an outstanding opportunity for many new countries to be introduced to sailing for people with disabilities. Vale Andrew Hartley 2 The day before the Conference, 9.6.61—1.2.05 Sailability representatives from nine coun- Skoto Hem 3 tries were fortunate to have the opportunity Frankie Thanapal Sinniah, President of SWEDEN to meet face to face. Even though everyone Sailability Singapore with was well acquainted through email contact, IFDS Single Person 4 this was the first opportunity for many to pore, Malaysia, Japan, USA, France, Greece, Dinghy World C’ships meet each other. A number of important Italy, Austria, Netherlands and Hungary. ITALY topics were discussed at the meeting includ- Sailability originated in Great Britain ing future development, Sailability Interna- in the 1980. In 1991 Sailability was intro- Camp Access 4 tional Inc. wishes to heartily congratulate duced to Australia and since 1995 Sailability Snohomish County, WA IFDS on the triumphant YES Conference and has proliferated throughout the world, im- USA thank IFDS for the opportunity to hold the proving the lives of many thousands of disad- Sailability meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008-09
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARTS, SPORT AND RECREATION ANNUAL REPORT 2008–09 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARTS, SPORT AND RECREATION CONTENTS 2 LETTER OF 6 OVERVIEW 15 REVIEW OF contSUBMISSION 7 Who we are OPERATIONS 7 What we do 16 Corporate Result 1: Stronger community cohesion 3 DIRECTOR-GENERAL’S 7 Our stakeholders REPORT and capacity 7 Reporting framework 29 Corporate Result 2: 9 Performance summary Improved health and wellbeing 12 Financial position 40 Corporate Result 3: 13 Corporate governance Strong, sustainable and responsible arts, hospitality, sport and recreation industries Front cover: image of children with artwork, courtesy of Art Gallery of NSW, features children’s guide Mandy Palmer with students from Allambie Heights Primary School. Photo: Carley Wright. The Department of the Arts, Sport and Recreation combines the skills and resources of Arts NSW, the NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing, entsand NSW Sport and Recreation. The purpose of the Department is to foster a more active, rewarding and fulfilling lifestyle for the people of New South Wales. 50 Corporate Result 4: 64 FINANCIAL 113 APPENDIXES World-class standards of STATEMENTS ents187 Abbreviations and shortened achievement and performance 65 Director-General’s Declaration forms in arts and sport 66 Independent Auditor’s Report 189 Index 56 Corporate Result 5: Increased community and 67 Financial Statements 192 Contact stakeholder appreciation 75 Notes to the Financial of the value of the arts and the Statements State’s cultural heritage, sport and recreation and the natural environment 59 Corporate Result 6: An efficient and responsive organisation LETTER OF SUBMISSION The Hon. N. Rees, MP The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 European Championships Circolo Vela Gargnano – May 2011
    Event Report 2011 European Championships Circolo Vela Gargnano – May 2011 The 2011 European Access Class Championships were conducted from Tuesday 24 to Sunday 29 May by Circolo Vela Gargnano at Bogliaco, Lake Garda, Italy. The event attracted the following entries: Class Entries Competitors Male Female Nations Access 2.3 Single Person 8 8 6 2 4 Access 303 Single Person 9 9 8 1 5 Access Liberty Single Person 7 7 5 2 3 Access 303 Two Person 12 24 16 8 4 SKUD 18 Two Person 5 10 6 4 4 TOTAL 41 57* 40 (70%) 17 (30%) 10 * One male competitor sailed in both single and two-person divisions Participating nations: AUS, ESP, FRA, GBR, HUN, ISR, ITA, NED, POR, SUI. Sailors with a disability comprised 80% of the competitors. There was a 93% increase in the number of competitors from the inaugural European Championships conducted in Port Camargue, France, in 2009 and entries were well above expectations. Eight of the ten nations achieved podium positions. Switzerland attended with a large and well supported team of 10 sailors competing in the Access 303 two person division. Portugal dominated the Access 2.3 fleet, providing 5 of the 8 entries. The UK contingent was also large and well supported, with entries in four divisions. At the conclusion of the event, GBR was awarded the European Championships Nations Trophy donated by Circolo Vela Gargnano. Schedule The dates of the regatta fitted well with ISAF Sailing World Cup (SKUD 18) events and National Championships in France, Portugal and the UK. Avoiding the peak holiday season also ensured accommodation options were more plentiful and less expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Race
    ACCESS CLASS EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIPS 2013 ARBON SWITZERLAND Access Class European Championships 2013 7. – 12. May 2013 Yacht Club Arbon Arbon, Lake Constance, Switzerland Notice of Race www.accessclasseuro2013.com Organization Authority Yacht Club Arbon (YCA) as the organising authority in cooperation with Sailability.ch as well as the Swiss Access Class Associa- tion (SACA) would like to extend an invitation to all Access Class sailors to participate in the Access Class European Champion- ships 2013. Yacht Club Arbon Adolph-Saurer-Quai 19 9320 Arbon Switzerland www.yca.ch Table of Contents Welcome Note Rolf Niederer, President of the Yacht Club Arbon 3 Welcome Note Ueli Maurer, Federal Councillor 4 Welcome Note Monika Knill, President of the Government 4 Host City and Venue 5 Programm Overview 6 Overview Map of the Marina in Arbon 7 Race Officials and Organization Committee 8 Notice of Race 9 Entry Form 15 How to get there 16 Accommodation 17 Charter Boats 17/18 Official Partners & Supporters 19 page 2 www.accessclasseuro2013.com Welcome to the Yacht Club Arbon Dear Access Class sailors, We are delighted to be organizing the 2013 International European Championships for you. Yacht Club Arbon has already celebrated its 46th birthday. In previous years we have held major regattas and championships against the magnificent backdrop of Arbon’s old town. YCA and its organizational committee aim to draw on this experience in order to ensure that the European Championships run smoothly and to put on a successful event for you. We are very grateful to be able to count on the generous support of sponsors and well-wishers as without them it would barely be possible to hold a regatta on this scale.
    [Show full text]