DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rival Poets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rival Poets THE RIVAL POETS country lady who makes the most of the running. Critics see . Shakespeare's patron the Earl of Southampton in gentle, pursued 15 The Rival Poets Adonis, but it is also not hard to see Shakespeare's wife Anne Hathaway in Venus; and though he may be advising Southamp ton about marriage in the latter part of the poem) the earlier part reads like an apologia for what happened to Shakespeare himself - marrying an older woman because she was pregnant. Kit Marlowe's Hero and Leander was unfinished at his death, Kit Marlowe's gentlemanly treatment of Hero could have been but this does not mean it was his last work. He may well have influenced by his motler, if he stayed with his parenrs while he written the part he did complete in Canterbury, while he was waited for his court appearance in Canterbury. Like many mothers waiting for his court appearance over the Corkine affair in the she may have decided it was time her son 'senled down', and if autufirn poem of t592, as the does not exude the plague and Joan Marlowe were Kit's widow she may originally have been a death atmosphere of. Doctor Faustus. The plague did affect girl chosen by his mother. He certainly showed awareness of Canterbury badly, but reached its height in 1593; plague in female apparel in his description of Hero and his attirude to her London always reached Canterbury but took a while to travel was loverlike rather than brotherly. up the Dover road. It seems likely that it was work on Doctor Faustus, rather tban Hero ond Leander, which occupied Kit At Sestos Hero dwelt; Hero the fair, Marlowe when he went to stay with Thomas Walsingham at $7hom young Apollo courted for her hair, Scadbury, on his return from Canterbury. Faustus said in And offered as a dower his burning throne, Scene i: Where she should sit for men to gaze upon. The outside of her garments were of lawn, Are not thy bills hung up as monuments, The lining purple sil\ with gilt stars drawn; Whereby whole cities have escap'd the plague Her wide sleeves green, and bordered a grove, And thousand desperate maladies been cur'd? with I7here Venus in her naked glory strove However, Kit Madowe must have shown Hero and Leander To please the careless and disdainful eyes to his circle of acquaintances because it inspired the new play- Of proud Adonis that before her lies. wright, William Shakespeare, to his first major work of verse, Her kirde blue, whereon was many a stain, Venus and Adonis, registered which was in April 1593 and Made with the blood of wretched lovers slain. printed by his friend Richard Field. Marlowe's poem was not Upon her head she ware a myrde wreath, published until 1598, with Chapman's completion. From whence her veil reached to the ground beneath. Though the poems are linked, Marlowe's unfinished one is the more accomplished. It is the work of a practised poet, while Kit Marlowe's Hero was attracted to Leander but needed con- Shakespeare's is lively but uneven. There is a great difference stant wooing. Leander was inexperienced 'and raw', and learned between the heroines. Marlowe's Hero is gende, ladylike, if about love-making in the course of the wooing - which may be occasionally spirited. Shakespeare's Venus is an overpowering what happened to Kit Marlowe himself. tz8 r29 WHO WAS KIT MARLOWE? THE R,IVAL POETS Albeit Leander, rude in love, and raw, The white of Pelops' shoulder. I could tell ye Long dallying with Hero, nothing saw How smooth his breast was, and how white his bellS That might delight him more, yet he suspected And whose irnmortal fingers did imprinr Some amorous rites or other were neglected. That heavenly path with many a curious dint Therefore unto his body hers he clung; That runs along his back, but my rude pen She, fearing on the rushes to be flung, Can hardly blazon forrh the loves of men, Strived with redoubled strength; the more she strived Much less of powerful gods: let it suffice The more a gende pleasing heat revived, That my siack muse sings cf tr-eander's eyes, Which taught him all that elder lovers know. Those orient cheeks and lips . And now the same 'gan so to scorch and glow, There is an emphasis on never having kraori'n love, anC on find- As in plain terms (yet strnningly) he craved it; ing iove, in the next lines. Love always makes those eloquent that have it. The rnen of wealthy Sestos, every year, Shakespeare's lovers parted difierendy, with Adonis showing For his sake whom goddess litde sympathy for Venus: their held so dear, Rose-cheeked .Adonis, kept a solemn feast. the sweet embrace With this, he breaketh frorn Thither resorted many a wand'ring guest those fair arms which bound him to her breast, Of To meet their loves; such as had none at all And homeward through the dark laund runs apace; Came lovers home from this great festival. Leaves Love upon her bac\ deeply disffess'd. Shakespeare's nature descriptions were the more realistic, but Both poems are erotic, but Marlowe's is the more polished and Marlowe wrote of love-making with greater detail and more loverlike. Shakespeare seemed relieved when he could get back delicacy. to nafure, and for example, spent several verses describing a horse. Herewith affrighted Hero shrunk away, Both poems did have some tongue-in-cheek linesl there were And in her lukewarm place Leander lay, many in-jokes between the literary fraternity at the time, for Whose lively heat, like fire from heaven fet, example Raleigh's 'reply'to Marlowe's'Come Live With Me and $/ould animate gross clay, and higher set Be My Love', and Donne's parody of it, about fishes. Marlowe's The drooping thoughts of base declining souls elaborate description of Leander's body was in this vein and has Than dreary Mars carousing nectar bowls. see homosexuality. There been misinterpreted by some critics who His hands he cast upon her like a snare . is certainly a sense of humour in his rnost outrageous lines. Yet there with Sisyphus he toiled in vain, Till gende parley did the truce obrain. His body was straight as Circe's wand; Wherein Leander on her quivering breast Jove might have sipped out nectar from his hand. Breathless spoke something, and sighed our the rest; Even as delicious meat is to the taste, Which so prevailed . So was his neck in touching, and surpassed r30 I3I WHO WAS KIT MARLOWE? THE RIVAL POETS Kit Marlowe is never more clearly seen than when something But when your counrenance filled up his line, he wrote is compared with a related work by someone else. Com- Then lacked I marter; that enfeebled mine. Life, an parison of Doctor Faustus with the translated Darnnable .rival and these lines come from Shakespeare's poet' sonnet which which most of it was based, shows Kit Marlowe softening the has been the source of much speculation. The other poet can blows, thus belying the accusation that he was always a stirrer' definitely be established as Kit Marlowe when Shakespeare's comparison of. Hero and Leonder with venus and Adonis reveals sonnet is compared with Thomas Thorpe,s letter of dedication Kit Marlowe as more polished, and more diffident, than Shakes- (to Edward Blout) of Marlowe's translation of the First Book of peare was at that time. Chapman's completion of Marlowe's Lucar5 in 16oo. Shakespeare's sonnet contains a paraphrase of Hero and Leander, competent, benevolent and classically correct, Thorpe's words about 'that pure elemental wit, Chr. Marlow'. points up the spiritedness and slight ingenuousness of Marlowe's Thorpe said that Marlowe's 'ghoast or Genius is to be seene part. walke the Churchyard in (at the least) three or foure sheets. Me Both Venus and Adonis and Hero ond Leander have sad end- thinks you should presendy looke wilde now, and grow humour- ings, whioh Marlowe avoided by leaving his part unfinished' If ously frantique upon the tasr of it . This spirit was sometimes he were in the flush of first love he would not want to contem- a familiar of your own.' plate his own death, as occurred to unfortunate Leander and Shakespeare said: Adonis. It is ironic that Marlowe himself was to die, while to mellow middle age. The shakespeare and chapman conrinued $fas it his spirit, by spirits taught to write verses to Thomas suggestion that the dedication of Marlowe's Above a mortal pitch, that struck me dead? Walsingham(andChapman'scompletiontoAudreylfalsing- No, neither he, nor his compeers by night together) was a wedding mam when the parts were published Giving him aid, my verse astonished. seems strange when the poetic lovers grft to the Walsinghams He nor tbat afiable familiar ghost to Marlowe this met such a fate; though if it were a memorial $fhich nightly gulls him with intelligence, pubtshed several years makes more sense. Shakespeare's poem, As victors of my silence cannot boast; Richard Field while Marlowe's earlier, was printed by his friend I was not sick of any fear from thence . must have circulated in manuscript. Shakespeare was not afraid even humorously, Musaeus had been the basis of the story of. Hero and Leander, of the 'familiar ghost', familiar pun and Ovid for Venus and Adonis, though Marlowe's Hero and being a on magician's familiars, as in Faustus and as used by Thorpe, but he knew Marlowe's verse superior Leand.er had Ovidean overtones.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dark Lady of the Merchant of Venice
    3 The dark lady of The Merchant of Venice ‘The Sonnets of Shakespeare offer us the greatest puzzle in the history of English literature.’ So began the voyage of Alfred Leslie Rowse (1903–97) through the murky waters cloaking the identi- ties of four persons associated with the publication in 1609 of Shakespeare’s ‘sugared sonnets’: the enigmatic ‘Mr. W.H.’ cited in the forepages as ‘onlie begetter’ of the poems; the unnamed ‘fair youth’ addressed in sonnets 1–126; the ‘rival poet’ who surfaces and submerges in sonnets 78–86; and the mysterious ‘dark lady’ celebrated and castigated in sonnets 127–52.1 Doubtless, even as Thomas Thorpe’s edition was passing through George Eld’s press, London’s mice-eyed must have begun their search for the shadowy four; it has not slacked since. As to those nominated as ‘Mr. W.H.’, the list ranges from William Herbert to Henry Wroithesley (with initials reversed) to William Harvey (Wroithesley’s stepfather). In 1964 Leslie Hotson proposed one William Hatcliffe of Lincolnshire [!], while Thomas Tyrwitt, Edmond Malone, and Oscar Wilde all favoured a (fictional) boy actor, Willie Hughes. Among candidates for the ‘fair youth’, Henry Wroithesley, Earl of Southampton (1573–1624), appears to have outlasted all comers. Those proposed as the rival poet include Christopher Marlowe (more interested in boys than ladies dark or light); Samuel Daniel (Herbert’s sometime tutor);2 Michael Drayton, drinking partner of Jonson and Shakespeare; George Chapman, whose Seaven Bookes of the Iliades (1598) were a source for Troilus and Cressida; and Barnabe Barnes, lampooned by Nashe as ‘Barnaby Bright’ in Have with you to Saffron-Walden.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal in the Life of Edward De Vere & the Works of Shakespeare
    Brief Chronicles V (2014) 47 Betrayal in the Life of Edward de Vere & the Works of Shakespeare Richard M. Waugaman* “The reasoned criticism of a prevailing belief is a service to the proponents of that belief; if they are incapable of defending it, they are well advised to abandon it. Any substantive objection is permissible and encouraged; the only exception being that ad hominem attacks on the personality or motives of the author are excluded.” — Carl Sagan e have betrayed Shakespeare. We have failed to recognize his true identity. Any discussion of the theme of betrayal in his works must Wbegin here. We psychoanalysts have also betrayed Freud, in “analyzing” rather than evaluating objectively Freud’s passionately held belief during his final years that “William Shakespeare” was the pseudonym of the Elizabethan courtier poet and playwright Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford (1550-1604).1 Freud realized that one unconscious motive for our betrayal of Shakespeare2 is our implacable wish to idealize him. That is, we prefer to accept the traditional author not just in spite of how little we know about him, but precisely because we know so little about him. Thus, we can more easily imagine that this shadowy inkblot of a figure was as glorious a person as are his literary creations. The real Shakespeare was a highly flawed human being who knew betrayal first-hand, since his childhood, from both sides, both as betrayer and betrayed. * This article was originally published in Betrayal: Developmental, Literary, and Clinical Realms, edited by Salman Akhtar (published by Karnac Books in 2013), and is reprinted with kind per- mission of Karnac Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit -3 Shakespeare : W.H. and Dark Lady 3.1 Objectives : 3.2
    Unit -3 qqq Shakespeare : W.H. and Dark Lady Structure 3.1 Objectives 3.2 Shakespeare : Life and Works 3.3 Shakespeare’s Sonnets 3.4 The Text: W.H. 3.4.1 Sonnet I 3.4.2 Sonnet LV (55) 3.4.3 Sonnet CXVI (116) 3.4.4 Sonnet 126 3.5 The Text: Dark Lady 3.5.1 Sonnet CXXX (130) 3.5.2 Sonnet CXXXVIII (138) 3.6 Conclusion 3.7 Questions 3.8 Reference 3.1 qqq Objectives : I welcome you to this Unit but not without some hesitation. Some of you, 1 am afraid, may want to question the relevance as well as the utility of an introduction to William Shakespeare for, generally speaking, neither in your school nor in your college have you been too far away from the Bard of Avon. You could not have been. A student of English Literature cannot perhaps hope to graduate without reading Shakespeare because it will mean studying the human body and not learning about the heart and the circulatory system. Yet I feel that I should introduce or rather re-introduce Shakespeare to make you aware of certain facts/issues/controversies. 3.2 qqq Shakespeare : Life and Works From your study of Shakespeare at the undergraduate level, you know that a great deal 70 of mystery shrouds the poet-dramatist and his identity itself has been in question for many hundred years now. It has almost turned into a literary detective story, with enthusiasts trying to unveil the truth about a man known to have been born in Stratford-upon-Avon on 23 April 1564 and baptized on the 26th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rival Poet in Shake-Speare's Sonnets
    The Rival Poet in Shake-speare’s Sonnets by Hank Whittemore he identity of the Rival Poet of the Shakespeare sonnets, who appears within the span of verses numbered 78 to 86, has seemed to elude Stratfordians and TOxfordians alike. The orthodox model has allowed us to view this series in just one way – that among the other poets there is one flesh-and-blood figure, tow- ering above them all, who is stealing the attentions and affections of the Fair Youth,1 who is generally regarded as Henry Wriothesley, third Earl of Southampton.2 When J. Thomas Looney expresses his agreement in “Shakespeare” Identified that the beloved younger man was Southampton, he points to the rival series (sonnets 78 to 86) as powerful evidence. First, he cites Sonnet 81: “Your name from hence immor- tal life shall have” and notes that this immortality would be achieved by means of the younger earl’s unique association with William Shakespeare. Second, Looney cites the companion verse, Sonnet 82: “The dedicated words which writers use/ Of their fair subject, blessing every book” and notes that Oxford was referring to his own pub- lic dedications to Southampton of Venus and Adonis (1593) and Lucrece (1594) as by William Shakespeare (Looney, 440). Given the premise that Southampton is the friend or fair youth, Stratfordians have postulated many rivals – Barnes, Chapman, Chaucer, Daniel, Davies, Davison, Drayton, Florio, Golding, Greene, Griffin, Harvey, Jonson, Kyd, Lyly, Markham, Marlowe, Marston, Nashe, Peele, Spenser, the Italian Tasso, and Watson. Oxfordians have come up with some overlaps, such as Chapman and Marlowe, while adding the likes of Raleigh and the Earl of Essex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragic Vision in the Fair Youth Group in Shakespeare's Sonnets
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 941-948, May 2014 © 2014 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.5.941-948 The Tragic Vision in the Fair Youth Group in Shakespeare’s Sonnets Fenghua Ma School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University, 212013, Zhenjiang, China Abstract—The present paper explores the tragic vision reflected in the poet’s relationship with the fair young man in the Fair Youth group in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. It investigates into the cult of friendship in the Renaissance, and further analyzes Shakespeare’s attitude towards the true friendship. On the basis of the poet’s artistic criteria and his purpose of living, it also examines the causes of the poet’s change in his attitudes, namely, from confidence to melancholy, if not despair. Index Terms—tragic vision, friendship, Fair Youth, Shakespeare’s Sonnets I. INTRODUCTION Although William Shakespeare dedicated his genius chiefly to the stage, he ranks with the foremost English poets of his age for his narrative and lyric verse. In the year of 1609, when a quarto containing 154 poems, entitled Shakespeare’s Sonnets, was issued by Thomas Thorpe, a publisher, perhaps without authorization from the poet, nobody could imagine that this little volume would arouse so much attention from both readers and scholars. Let there be furious debate on identity, date, and order concerning these sonnets, critics tend to agree that “the direction of address of these poems can be established with certainty: the first 126 sonnets refer to and are generally addressed to the Fair Friend, while the succeeding ones concern the Dark Lady” (Dubrow, 1998, p.238).
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Sources for Sonnets 24 and 33 and for Henry VIII: Implications for De Vere’S Authorship
    Brief Chronicles IV (2012-13) 73 Biblical Sources for Sonnets 24 and 33 and for Henry VIII: Implications for de Vere’s Authorship Richard M. Waugaman hakespeare is often considered a secular writer, whose biblical allusions add little to our understanding of his plays and poetry. George Santayana Sdid his part to shape this misunderstanding. In his aptly if misleadingly named essay, “The Absence of Religion in Shakespeare,”1 he, like many others, seemed to project his own prejudices onto his image of Shakespeare, concluding that Shakespeare had a “strange insensibility to religion”;2 and that Shakespeare “confined his representation of life to its secular aspects.”3 However, if we free ourselves from our own secular bias, a close reading provides abundant evidence that Edward de Vere, in his “Shakespeare” canon, engaged repeatedly with biblical themes.4 He was so familiar with the language of the Bible that its phrases seemed to flow from his pen spontaneously, whether or not he was always mindful of these parallels. Sternhold and Hopkins’ translation of The Whole Book of Psalms (WBP) is a significant example of biblical influence on Shakespeare. Recent evidence suggests the WBP was more influential on de Vere’s plays than were the Coverdale, Bishops, or Genevan translations of the psalms.5 Many newly discovered allusions to the Psalms in de Vere were specifically toWBP . WBP is an especially rich source for the Sonnets, helping elucidate many previously enigmatic passages. WBP also influenced several sections in The Rape of Lucrece. De Vere’s repeated echoes of WBP alerted his contemporary audiences to intertextual reverberations, as the echoed psalms amplified, commented on, or contradicted the manifest meaning of de Vere’s text.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Conceit of This Inconstant Stay": Shakespeare's Philosophical Conquest of Time Through Personification
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 8-5-2010 "The conceit of this inconstant stay": Shakespeare's Philosophical Conquest of Time Through Personification Triche Roberson University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Roberson, Triche, ""The conceit of this inconstant stay": Shakespeare's Philosophical Conquest of Time Through Personification" (2010). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1203. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1203 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “The conceit of this inconstant stay”: Shakespeare‟s Philosophical Conquest of Time Through Personification A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English by Triche Maria Roberson B.A. Loyola University New Orleans, 2003 August 2010 Acknowledgment I would like to thank Mr. John Gery, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • George Chapman - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series George Chapman - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive George Chapman(1559 – 12 May 1634) George Chapman was an English dramatist, translator, and poet. He was a classical scholar whose work shows the influence of Stoicism. Chapman has been identified as the Rival Poet of <a href="http://www.poemhunter.com/william- shakespeare/">Shakespeare's</a> sonnets by William Minto, and as an anticipator of the Metaphysical Poets of the 17th century. Chapman is best remembered for his translations of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, and the <a href="http://www.poemhunter.com/homer/">Homeric</a> Batrachomyomachia. <b>Life and work</b> Chapman was born at Hitchin in Hertfordshire. There is conjecture that he studied at Oxford but did not take a degree, though no reliable evidence affirms this. We know very little about Chapman's early life, but Mark Eccles uncovered records that reveal much about Chapman's difficulties and expectations. In 1585 Chapman was approached in a friendly fashion by John Wolfall, Sr., who offered to supply a bond of surety for a loan to furnish Chapman money "for his proper use in Attendance upon the then Right Honorable Sir Rafe Sadler Knight." Chapman's courtly ambitions led him into a trap. He apparently never received any money, but he would be plagued for many years by the papers he had signed. Wolfall had the poet arrested for debt in 1600, and when in 1608 Wolfall's son, having inherited his father's papers, sued yet again, Chapman's only resort was to petition the Court of Chancery for equity.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Silenced
    Barber 1 ‘Tongue-tied by authority’: Shakespeare Silenced Dr Ros Barber, Goldsmiths, University of London Why do Shakespeare’s works endure? Certainly, he produced memorable tragic heroes and heroines in his genius-level drama and poetry, and moulded the English language into new and permanent forms: the phrase-maker extraordinaire, father of a hundred aphorisms. But though English has moved on to the point that studying Shakespeare can feel as taxing as learning the Latin and Greek that Ben Jonson claimed he had barely mastered, Shakespeare’s plays continue to speak to modern audiences for one single reason: his deep comprehension, and near-forensic examination, of human emotions. The emotional life of Shakespeare’s protagonists is rich and nuanced. Even when depicting what we might dare call pure evil, his portrayal of Richard III, the motivating emotions are comprehensible: Shakespeare’s Richard is no pantomime villain, and it is his deeply human complexity which continues to render him fascinating to both actors and audiences. Developing a new use for the soliloquy that Marlowe debuted in his Doctor Faustus, Shakespeare allows us into the minds of his flawed protagonists so that we can hear them not just think, but feel. Thus we witness directly, and feel empathetically, the anguish of Brutus’s decision to join in the assassination of Caesar; Hamlet’s painful vacillation; Lear’s soul-destroying regret. The emotional depth of Shakespeare’s characters is what imbues his plays with the vitality to survive close to half a millennium on the public stage, when those of contemporary Barber 2 genius Ben Jonson are rarely performed: we can still learn about ourselves from Shakespeare.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespearean Sonnet Thematic Groupings
    Shakespearean Sonnet Thematic Groupings William Shakespeare's ‘Major’ Sonnets (15) 2 When forty winters shall beseige thy brow, 15 When I consider every thing that grows 18 Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? 29 When, in disgrace with fortune and men's eyes, 30 When to the sessions of sweet silent thought 33 Full many a glorious morning have I seen 55 Not marble, nor the gilded monuments 65 Since brass, nor stone, nor earth, nor boundless sea, 72 O, lest the world should task you to recite 106 When in the chronicle of wasted time 116 Let me not to the marriage of true minds 129 The expense of spirit in a waste of shame 130 My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun; 144 Two loves I have of comfort and despair, 146 Poor soul, the centre of my sinful earth, A Thematic/Contentual Outline of William Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609) (154 total) I Addressed to Young Man 1-126 A. Formal Relationship of poet to patron 1-19 1. Procreation Sonnets 1-17 2. Immortality of Verse 18-19 B. Personal love between Poet and Young Man threatened by indifference, separation, and competition between Poet and both Rival Poet and Dark Lady, then final reconciliation 20-126 1. Poet's reciprocal love for young man 20-32 2. Unevenness 33-98 a. First suggestions of difficulty in stability of young man's love, then poet's acceptance 33-39. b. Poet jealous of love between young man and dark lady 40- 42. c. First physical distance separates poet and young man 43-52 d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rival Poet of Shake-Speare's Sonnets
    Peter R. Moore “The Rival Poet of Shake-speare’s Sonnets” lifetime, such as Henslowe, Alleyn, Nashe, The Rival Poet of Spenser, Bacon, Peacham, or Jonson himself! Shakespeare’s Sonnets 7) Shakespeare himself is silent on any “liter- ary activities,” even in his Last Will and Testa- ment; 8) indeed, the only clear-cut identifica- by Peter R. Moore tion of the Stratford man with the authorship is made seven years after his death, in the First HAKE-SPEARES SONNETS appeared in Folio; 9) The First Folio testimony is inconsis- 1609, apparently published without the tent with all the other evidence before us, lead- Sauthor’s consent, and probably quickly ing anti-Stratfordians to suspect that docu- suppressed by the authorities as they were not ment’s trustworthiness; and 10), if a nobleman republished until 1640. There are 154 sonnets; had written these works (a possibility deduced the first 126 address a young aristocrat, com- from the internal evidence of the plays them- monly called the Fair Youth, with whom selves), he would have been unable––owing to Shakespeare was infatuated (though whether the social opprobrium afforded poets and play- the motivation was sexual is quite unclear––I wrights of the nobility––to publish them under join the majority who believe it was not). The his own name, and would have been obliged, next twenty-six describe Shakespeare’s rela- therefore, to either use a nom de plume or to tions with his unfaithful mistress, the Dark work out an agreement with someone to loan Lady. These sonnets were apparently written his name for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • A POST-STRUCTURALIST ANALYSIS of SHAKESPEARE•S SONNETS by JANE ALLAN BELL, B.A
    POTIONS OF EISEL: A POST-STRUCTURALIST ANALYSIS OF SHAKESPEARE•s SONNETS by JANE ALLAN BELL, B.A. A THESIS IN ENGLISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of HASTER OF ARTS Approved Accepted December, 1991 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to Donald Rude for his direction of this thesis and to Leon Higdon for his helpful criticism. I must also thank Philip Marshall for his patience and encouragement. 11 CONlENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... Notes ................................................................................................... 6 II. THE PHAEDRUS, THE PHARMAKON. AND THE FAIR YOUNG MAN .................................................................................................... 7 Notes ................................................................................................... 3 I I I I. ABSENCE, SACRIFICE, AND DEATH ................................................... 3 3 Notes ................................................................................................... 52 IV. PERJURED PEN .......................................................................................... 5 4 Notes ................................................................................................... 8 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]