Ulu Ahupua‘A LHu‘E District, Kaua‘I Island TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 Por.And Various Rights-Of-Way Between Various Plats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ulu Ahupua‘A L�Hu‘E District, Kaua‘I Island TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 Por.And Various Rights-Of-Way Between Various Plats FINAL Archaeological Inventory Survey Report for the Nwiliwili-Ahukini Bike Path Project Nwiliwili, Kalapak, and Hanam‘ulu Ahupua‘a Lhu‘e District, Kaua‘i Island TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 por.and various rights-of-way between various plats Prepared for R.M. Towill Corporation Prepared by Kendy Altizer, B.A. and Hallett H. Hammatt, Ph.D. Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. Kailua, Hawai‘i (Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4) April 2010 O‘ahu Office Maui Office P.O. Box 1114 16 S. Market Street, Suite 2N Kailua, Hawai‘i 96734 Wailuku, Hawai‘i 96793 www.culturalsurveys.com Ph.: (808) 262-9972 Ph: (808) 242-9882 Fax: (808) 262-4950 Fax: (808) 244-1994 Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4 Management Summary Reference Archaeological Inventory Survey Report for the Nwiliwili-Ahukini Bike Path Project, Nwiliwili, Kalapak and Hanam‘ulu Ahupua‘a, Lhu‘e District, Kaua‘i Island, TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 por. and various rights-of-way between various plats (Altizer and Hammatt 2010). Date April 2010 Project Number Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i (CSH) Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4 Investigation This archaeological inventory survey was conducted under Permit Number archaeological permit numbers 09-20 and 10-10 issued by the Hawai‘i State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD), Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), per Hawai‘i Administrative Rules (HAR) Chapter 13-282. Project Location The project area addressed in this archaeological inventory survey report is located in coastal and near coastal portions of three ahupua‘a in Lhu‘e District, Island of Kaua‘i: Hanam‘ulu, Kalapak and Nwiliwili. The proposed bike and pedestrian path route alignments are located near, and adjacent to, Ahukini Landing, Nwiliwili Harbor Light, Lhu‘e Airport, Kaua‘i Lagoons and Marriottt Resort, Nwiliwili Park and Harbor, and Niumalu Park. This area is depicted on portions of the 1996 Lhu‘e and 1996 Kapa‘a U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- minute topographic quandrangle maps. Land Jurisdiction Public and private land Agencies SHPD/DLNR Project Description The current project is one phase of a larger project to connect Nwiliwili with Anahola by a bike and pedestrian path. This portion of the current project area will link Nwiliwili, Ahukini Landing, Nwiliwili Harbor Light, Lhu‘e Airport, Kaua‘i Lagoons and Marriottt Resort, Nwiliwili Park and Harbor, and Niumalu Park. Size of the Project Approximately 6 linear miles (10 km) of bike and pedestrian path Area routes are included in the alignment options for the current phase of this project; design and widths of the various alignment options vary. Area of Potential The Area of Potential Effect (APE) for the archaeological inventory Effect (APE) survey consists of two alignment-option corridors linking Ahukini Landing, Nwiliwili Harbor Light, Lhu‘e Airport, Kaua‘i Lagoons and Marriottt Resort. The APE for this inventory survey includes all lands in the vicinity of both alignment options from the western shoulder of the mauka corridor east to the ocean. Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Nwiliwili-Ahukini Bike Path Project ii TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 por. Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4 Historic This document was prepared to support the proposed project’s historic Preservation preservation review under Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter Regulatory Context 6E-8 and Hawai‘i Administrative Rules (HAR) Chapter 13-13-275. In consultation with SHPD, this inventory survey investigation was designed to fulfill the state requirements for archaeological inventory surveys (HAR Chapter 13-276). Fieldwork Effort The fieldwork component of this archaeological inventory survey was carried out by CSH archaeologists Gerald K. Ida, B.A., Nancine ‘Missy” Kamai, B.A., Kaipo Akana, and Kendy Altizer, B.A. Fieldwork was conducted intermittently between May 21, 2009 and February 16, 2010, under the general supervision of Hallett H. Hammatt, Ph.D. (principal investigator).The field work required approximately 29 person-days to complete. Number of Historic A total of 15 historic properties were identified as a result of the Properties inventory survey. Sites documented include 2 walls related to Identified plantation era sugar cane cultivation and/or ranching activities (Site 50- 30-11-422 [CSH 1] and Site 50-30-11-423 [CSH 2]); 2 pre-contact habitation terraces (Site 50-30-11-2086 [CSH 3] and Site 50-30-11- 2094 [CSH 12]); Nwiliwili Harbor Light and associated features (Site 50-30-11-2087 [CSH 5]); the remains of a historic communications tower (Site 50-30-11-2088 [CSH 6]; a possible burial mound (Site 50- 30-11-2089 [CSH 7]); a military gun emplacement (Site 50-30-11- 2090 [CSH 8]); 2 sites related to historic residences (Site 50-30-11- 2091 [CSH 9] and Site 50-30-11-2092 [CSH 10]); 1 plantation era earthen drainage ditch (Site 50-30-11-2093 [CSH 11]); 1 pre-contact activity area (Site 50-30-11-2095 [CSH 13]); 2 historic concrete drainage ditches (Site 50-30-11-2096 [CSH 14] and Site 50-30-11- 2097 [CSH 15]); and, remnants of a historic industrial complex (Site 50-30-11-2103 [CSH 16]). Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Nwiliwili-Ahukini Bike Path Project iii TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 por. Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4 Historic Properties A total of 9 sites are recommended eligible for the Hawai‘i Register: Recommended Site 50-30-11-2086 (CSH 3), a habitation terrace, recommended Eligible to the eligible under Criteria D and E. Hawai‘i Register of Historic Places Site 50-30-11-2087 (CSH 5), Nwiliwili Harbor Light and associated (Hawai‘i Register)¹ features, recommended eligible under Criteria C, D, and E. Site 50-30-11-2088 (CSH 6), foundation of a historic communications tower, recommended eligible under Criterion D. Site 50-30-11-2089 (CSH 7), possible historic burial mound, recommended eligible under Criteria D and E. Site 50-30-11-2090 (CSH 8), historic artillery gun emplacement, recommended eligible under Criterion D. Site 50-30-11-2092 (CSH 10), historic outhouse and cesspool, recommended eligible under Criterion D. Site 50-30-11-2094 (CSH 12), a habitation terrace, recommended eligible under Criteria D and E. Site 50-30-11-2095 (CSH 13), pre-contact activity area, recommended eligible under Criteria D and E. Site 50-30-11-2103 (CSH 16), historic industrial complex; recommended eligible under Criterion D. Historic Properties Site 50-30-11-422 (CSH 1), plantation era agricultural field divider Recommended Site 50-30-11-423 (CSH 2), plantation era agricultural field divider Ineligible to the Hawai‘i Register Site 50-30-11-2091 (CSH 9), historic building foundation Site 50-30-11-2093 (CSH 11), plantation era drainage ditch Site 50-30-11-2096 (CSH 14), historic drainage ditch Site 50-30-11-2097 (CSH 15), historic drainage ditch Effect The archaeological inventory survey investigation identified 15 Recommendation historic properties within the project area. Of these historic properties, nine are recommended eligible for the Hawai‘i State Register, and may potentially be affected by the proposed project. CSH’s project specific effect recommendation is “effect, with agreed upon mitigation measures.” The recommended mitigation measures will reduce the project's potentially adverse effect on these significant historic properties. Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Nwiliwili-Ahukini Bike Path Project iv TMK: [4] 3-5-01:4, 8, 27, 60, 83, 85, 102, 118, 128, 159, and 160 por. Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i Job Code: NAWILIWILI 4 Mitigation The following recommended significant historic properties will Recommendation potentially be adversely affected by the proposed project. The recommended mitigation measures listed below are intended to alleviate this adverse effect. The scope and methods for these mitigation measures should be developed in consultation with SHPD/DLNR. Site 50-30-11-2086 (CSH 3), a pre-contact habitation terrace; preservation, educational signage, avoid with a 20-ft. buffer. Site 50-30-11-2087 (CSH 5), Nwiliwili Harbor Light and associated features; preservation in the form of adaptive re-use and educational signage. Site 50-30-11-2088 (CSH 6), foundation of a historic communications tower, no further work. Site 50-30-11-2089 (CSH 7), possible historic burial mound; preservation, avoid with a 50-ft buffer, archaeological testing before construction begins. Site 50-30-11-2090 (CSH 8), historic artillery gun placement; preservation, avoid with a 20-ft buffer and educational signage. Site 50-30-11-2092 (CSH 10), historic outhouse and cesspool; no further work. Site 50-30-11-2094 CSH 12), a pre-contact habitation terrace; preservation, educational signage, avoid with a 20-ft. buffer. Site 50-30-11-2095 (CSH 13), a pre-contact activity area; no further work. Site 50-30-11-2103 (CSH 16), a historic industrial complex; educational signage. Of the nine sites recommended eligible to the Hawai‘i Register of Historic Places, six are recommended for preservation, and no further work is recommended for the three remaining sites. Site 50-30-2089 will be addressed by a Data Recovery Program, in compliance with HAR 13-13-278, prior to commencement of construction activities. This program will consist of a Data Recovery Plan, appropriate fieldwork, and a Data Recovery Report. Should human remains be identified, they will be considered previously identified and SHPD and the Kaua‘i Island Burial Council will be consulted for the appropriate treatment, per HRS 13-300-31. A Preservation Plan is recommended to address the remaining four sites that are recommended for preservation, in compliance with HAR 13-13-277.
Recommended publications
  • Restoring the Wiliwili Forest of Waikoloa by Jen Lawson, Waikoloa Dry Forest Initiative
    Restoring the Wiliwili Forest of Waikoloa by Jen Lawson, Waikoloa Dry Forest Initiative Waikoloa Village on Hawai‘i Island was built in an area that was once a native Ha- waiian tropical dryland forest, one of the most biologically diverse and beautiful eco- systems of our islands. Not that a casual ob- server would know that looking at Waikoloa today. The lowland dry forests of the past have been almost completely lost, largely due to human activities, the introduction and ex- pansion of feral ungulates, invasive plant spe- cies and an increase in fire frequency. What is left is precious. Although fragmented and degraded, the areas of native forest that still persist are precious, beautiful and inspiring Wiliwili flower places and the wiliwili forest of Waikoloa is one of those amazing places worthy of preservation. In 2003 members of the Waikoloa Village community, that would later form the Waikoloa Dry For- est Initiative (WDFI), saw something startling happening in their community. Ancient wiliwili (Erythrina sandwicensis) trees were being removed from the native soil that had been their home for hundreds of years and being transplanted into the landscapes of wiliwili enthusiasts wealthy enough to procure one from the wild. The small group of citizen stewards was effective in preventing the removal and sale of any more wiliwili trees in the area and also began a movement to change the future of the landscape in Waikoloa. Today WDFI manages the Waikoloa Dry Forest Preserve which protects nearly 300 acres of lowland dry forest including many of the wiliwili trees that remain in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pua Ka Wiliwili, Nanahu Ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Pua Ka
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons@Wayne State University Wayne State University Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints WSU Press 7-1-2020 Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture Noelani Puniwai University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints Recommended Citation Puniwai, Noelani, "Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture" (2020). Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints. 174. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints/174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WSU Press at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture Noelani Puniwai1* 1Kamakakūokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA. *Correspondence to: Noelani Puniwai, Kamakakūokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 2645 Dole Street, Room 209BB, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA. E- mail: [email protected]. Short Title: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture KEY WORDS: SHARKS, WORLDVIEW, CLASSIFICATION, HAWAI’I, LANGUAGE. Abstract Kanaka maoli (Indigenous Hawaiians) are blessed with a written literature that documents observations and relationships with our environment in the form of chants, stories, and genealogies passed down orally for centuries. These literatures connect us to our ancestral knowledge and highlight species, places, and processes of importance. Sayings, such as this one from the Kumulipo (our creation story) Pua ka wiliwili, nanahu ka manō, is an example of the place of nature, man, and a specific creature the shark in ecological phenology.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiliwili Gall Wasp Invasion Length: One Class Period with Optional Homework Assignment
    Activity #6 Invasive Species Unit 3 Activity #6 Wiliwili Gall Wasp Invasion Length: One class period with optional homework assignment Prerequisite Activity: None Objectives: • Trace the path of the 2005 wiliwili gall wasp invasion on Maui using real-life data. • Identify vectors ad pathways that facilitate the spread of invasive species. • Devise strategies for stopping an invasive pest. • Predict the efficacy of control strategies, based on existing and plausible environmental factors. Vocabulary: biological control (or biocontrol) Erythrina gall wasp (EGW) deciduous vector dormancy ••• Class Period One: Exploring the Gall Wasp Invasion on Google Earth In Advance This exercise requires access to Google Earth (free software available for download at www.earth. google.com) and the Wiliwili Gall Wasp Hoike.kmz file (included with this curriculum and available for download at www.hoikecurriculum.org). It’s best to pre-load computers with the program and file, rather than use class time to do so. Ideally students will work in small groups at their own computers as you lead them through the lesson, using a projector and screen. If that’s not possible, a single computer and projector will suffice. Prior to teaching the lesson, open Google Earth. If you’re using the software for the first time, take a few moments to learn how zoom, pan, search, etc. using the “Navigating Google Earth” tutorial avail- able at www.earth.google.com. It is best, though not necessary, to use Google Earth while connected to the Internet. Explore the Wiliwili Gall
    [Show full text]
  • Kauai Fact Sheet
    Lorem Ipsum Fact Sheet – Kaua`i’s Wailua to Kapa`a Corridor THE REGION Ke Ala Hele Makalae coastal multi-use path: This 3.8 mile long multi-use pathway travels along the coastline passing by The Royal Coconut Coast, also known as Kaua`i’s east beach parks and scenic viewpoints providing spectacular views side, extends from the Wailua Golf Course to Kealia Beach, for bikers, joggers, walkers and skateboarders. The trail has and towards the interior of Kaua`i to Mt. Waialeale. This several lookouts with sheltered picnic pavilions. Restrooms and area, distinguished by acres of royal palm trees seen along drinking fountains are provided in two public parks on the trail. Kuhio Highway, contains more than a third of Kaua`i’s Kaua`i County is in the process of extending the trail several lodging properties. Many are considered “affordable.” miles west towards Lihue Several popular beach parks, restaurants, bike paths, hiking trails, and a variety of stores, shops and services are found Historical Sites: The Royal Coconut Coast is an area where here. The area also boasts of Hawai`i’s historic Wailua Kaua`i`is ali`i (royalty) were born and Hawaiians practiced River, the famed Fern Grotto, and the Wailua Golf Course. important cultural customs. Hawaiian heiaus (worship and Considered a central location, the Royal Coconut Coast is ceremony locations) start from the mouth of Wailua River, and fifteen minutes from the airport, and a half hour from continue up to the summit of Mt. Waialeale. Huaka`i po (ghost Kaua`i’s north and south shores.
    [Show full text]
  • Remnant Wiliwili Forest Habitat at Wailea 670, Maui, Hawai`I: II. Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    SPECIAL REPORT Maui Ecosystems at Risk Remnant Wiliwili Forest Habitat at Wailea 670, Maui, Hawai`i: II. Comments On the Draft Environmental Impact Statement AUGUST 2010 Lee Altenberg, Ph.D. Associate Editor, BioSystems Journal (Elsevier) Kihei, Maui, Hawai`i 96753-7118 • telephone: 808.875.0745 • [email protected] • dynamics.org/Wailea670 Wiliwili Forest at Wailea 670: II. Comments on Draft EIS!Lee Altenberg Summary The proposed project represents the largest deliberate destruction of lowland Ha- waiian dry forest ecosystem to occur on Maui in decades. Lowland Hawaiian dry forest ecosystem is among the twenty most endangered ecosystems in the United States. The DEIS compares this remnant with other remnants only to denigrate its conservation value and justify the proposed destruction of some 72% of this rem- nant, and severe fragmentation of another 14%. But it is silent on the importance of large, unfragmented habitat for conservation of biodiversity, and the fact that the project contains about the fourth largest of eight remaining large contiguous rem- nants of lowland dry forest on Maui. Moreover, the remnant is some 4 miles from Pu`u O Kali, which contains a number of listed endangered plant species, and it is likely that it could serve as critical habitat in their recovery. All of these eight rem- nants of this endangered ecosystem should be preserved and dedicated to restora- tion efforts. General Comments Lowland Hawaiian dry forest is an endangered ecosystem. Government and private ac- tions have allowed this ecosystem to be reduced to amounts and states of degradation that threaten its long-term existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Group 2009
    1 Erythrina sandwicensis Demography and Spatial Patterns of Erythrina gall wasp, Quadratichus erythrinae Infestation in Waikoloa, Hawai‘i Couch, C.S., J.S. Simonis, R.Q. Thomas, M. Manuel, D. Faucette, J.P. Sparks Abstract: Hawai‘i’s tropical dry forests are unique and highly endangered ecosystems that are currently being degraded by human development and invasive species. The Wiliwili tree, Erythrina sandwicensis (Fabaceae), a dominant species in Hawaiian tropical dry forests is now critically threatened due to the destructive impacts of invasive species, in particular the Erythrina gall wasp, Quadratichus erythrinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Here, we investigated the spatial and size distribution patterns of E. sandwicensis and potential effects of Q. erythrinae on population demographics by surveying a 310 ha parcel of dry forest in Waikoloa, Hawai‘i. This population of E. sandwicensis is comprised of 119 live trees, all of which are large adults that were spatially clumped to a radius of 400 meters.. In addition, the level of infestation of individual trees by Q. erythrinae was highly spatially autocorrelated, with the greatest correlation occurring within 100 m. Individual trees with higher gall wasp infestation had less tree leaf cover and a lower probability of seeds being present. The results of this study demonstrate that the largest population of E. sandwicensis on Hawai‘i is currently threatened by an invasive insect that alters the ability of trees to photosynthesize and decreases reproductive output. The clumped distribution of individuals likely facilitates the spread of the gall wasp but may allow for spatially focused conservation efforts. Thus a greater understanding of the severity of 2 invasive species impacts on plant physiology and reproductive fitness is necessary for the proper management of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Alien and Native Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) from the Hawaiian Islands1
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2012. Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis & Lucius G. Eldredge. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 114: 61 –65 (2013) Notes on alien and native bees (Hymenoptera : Apoidea ) from the Hawaiian Islands 1 KARl N. M AGNACCA 2,3 Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife, c/o University of Hawai‘i–Hilo, Dept. of Biology, 200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA; email: [email protected] JASoN GiBBS Cornell University, Department of Entomology, 3119 Comstock Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA; email: [email protected] SAM dRoeGe U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 11510 American Holly Drive, Laurel, Maryland 20708-4017, USA; email: [email protected]) Four introduced bees are recorded from the Hawaiian islands for the first time, along with notes on previously recorded species, including rediscovery of the endemic Hylaeus anom - alus (Perkins, 1899). Both of the new Lasioglossum species are relatively recent arrivals, but their precise date of introduction is not known because the alien Lasioglossum are often ignored by collectors and are poorly represented in collections. it had been assumed that all were L. impavidum (Sandhouse, 1924), which has been present in the islands since at least 1957 (Beardsley 1958, Beardsley 1959). A recent survey of o‘ahu lowland disturbed sites by Sd found three distinct species – L. impavidum , L. imbrex Gibbs, 2010, and L. microlepoides (ellis, 1914) – prompting a review of earlier specimens. Unless otherwise noted, specimens listed below were collected by KNM; specimens are deposited at the Bishop Museum (BPBM) and University of Hawai‘i–Mānoa insect Museum (UHiM).
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology and Population Genetics of Hawaiian Wiliwili, Erythrina Sandwicensis (Fabaceae)
    REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND POPULATION GENETICS OF HAWAIIAN WILIWILI, ERYTHRINA SANDWICENSIS (FABACEAE) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BOTANY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) AUGUST 2018 By Emily F. Grave Thesis Committee: Tamara Ticktin (Chairperson) Curt Daehler Cliff Morden Daniela Elliot Keywords: dry forest, pollination biology, population genetics, conservation biology, Erythrina DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this work, and resulting thesis, to my late mother Barbara Jean Grave. My true love of nature was fostered through my first teacher, my mom, who never stopped learning and teaching me about the beauty, wonder, and significance of the world around us. And to my son, Sebastian, for whom I hope to bestow upon my fascination with our enigmatic ecosystems. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank the many people who have sacrificed their time to advance this project and its several components. My committee members, Tamara Ticktin, Curt Daehler, Daniela Elliot, and Cliff Morden have been incredibly insightful and supportive, and have helped propel this study into fruition. My field assistant and partner, Tim Kroessig, was instrumental in formulating the basis behind this research. From realizing the importance of the research, to the proposal and permitting, to hours of field work, and onward through the data collection phase, Tim helped make this study a successful reality. His ideas and innovations greatly strengthened the results of the research. I am very grateful to my lab mates: Reko Libby, Zoe Hastings, Georgia Fredeluces-Hart, Ashley McGuigan, Gioconda López, and Leo Beltran (and Solomon Champion and Miles Thomas as well), who spent several hours in (and out of) the field with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Hist Nat Plant GOOD Spring 08 Copy
    HAWAIIAN BOTANICAL Why should we learn about native plants?! HISTORY! •! Most endangered flora in the world! Adapted from the course: Botany 130: •! Provides Plants in the Hawaiian Environment, environmental benefits! Hybrid course, TV and live lab! •! Part of Hawaiian culture! •! Scientific value! Koa flowers! •! 90% unique! •! Rapidly disappearing! Ma’o hau hele, Hibiscus brackenridgei! ENDANGERED, State Flower! Hawaiian Islands on the Pacific Plate! Site of “Hot Spot” Activity! The Hawaiian Island Chain arose from the floor of the Pacific Ocean # THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS are the most remote island chain in the after the world's great continents were essentially in the position they are world # found today, and all the recent plant and animal life forms were also They are about 2,500 miles from the closest continental area, the nearest island chain, the present on the earth. # Marquesas . Asia, southeast Asia, and Australia/New Zealand are 4,000 miles away. # Original plant colonists, or immigrants, had to successfully disperse across at least 2,500 miles This is in very recent geologic time for the origin of the Hawaiian Islands! # of open ocean! ! NATIVE: """ Occurring naturally. Developed or migrated to the site without Native Plants: Endemic or Indigenous! human help or intervention. ! INTRODUCED:" Brought to site intentionally or accidentally with human INDIGENOUS : found naturally at others sites, not restricted. ! help or activity .! Pohuehue, Native Beach! Morning Glory! ENDEMIC: Found naturally only at the site and not elsewhere in the world. # Haleakala Sandalwood! Ohe! Polynesian Introductions! Ape! Pia! POLYNESIAN INTRODUCTIONS: # Brought by original Polynesian voyagers to the islands. ! Many have been here 1,000 or more years.
    [Show full text]
  • Auwahi: Ethnobotany of a Hawaiian Dryland Forest
    AUWAHI: ETHNOBOTANY OF A HAWAIIAN DRYLAND FOREST. A. C. Medeiros1, C.F. Davenport2, and C.G. Chimera1 1. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Haleakala Field Station, P.O. Box 369, Makawao, HI 96768 2. Social Sciences Department, Maui Community College, 310 Ka’ahumanu Ave., Kahului, HI 96732 ABSTRACT Auwahi district on East Maui extends from sea level to about 6800 feet (1790 meters) elevation at the southwest rift of leeward Haleakal¯a volcano. In botanical references, Auwahi currently refers to a centrally located, fairly large (5400 acres) stand of diverse dry forest at 3000-5000 feet (915- 1525 meters) elevation surrounded by less diverse forest and more open-statured shrubland on lava. Auwahi contains high native tree diversity with 50 dryland species, many with extremely hard, durable, and heavy wood. To early Hawaiians, forests like Auwahi must have seemed an invaluable source of unique natural materials, especially the wide variety of woods for tool making for agriculture and fishing, canoe building, kapa making, and weapons. Of the 50 species of native trees at Auwahi, 19 species (38%) are known to have been used for medicine, 13 species (26%) for tool-making, 13 species (26%) for canoe building 13 species (26%) for house building, 8 species (16%) for tools for making kapa, 8 species (16%) for weapons 8 species (16%) for fishing, 8 species (16%) for dyes, and 7 species (14 %) for religious purposes. Other miscellaneous uses include edible fruits or seeds, bird lime, cordage, a fish narcotizing agent, firewood, a source of "fireworks", recreation, scenting agents, poi boards, and h¯olua sled construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapa'a, Waipouli, Olohena, Wailua and Hanamā'ulu Island of Kaua'i
    CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KAPA‘A RELIEF ROUTE; KAPA‘A, WAIPOULI, OLOHENA, WAILUA AND HANAMĀ‘ULU ISLAND OF KAUA‘I by K. W. Bushnell, B.A. David Shideler, M.A. and Hallett H. Hammatt, PhD. Prepared for Kimura International by Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. May 2004 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i wishes to acknowledge, first and foremost, the kūpuna who willingly took the time to be interviewed and graciously shared their mana‘o: Raymond Aiu, Valentine Ako, George Hiyane, Kehaulani Kekua, Beverly Muraoka, Alice Paik, and Walter (Freckles) Smith Jr. Special thanks also go to several individuals who shared information for the completion of this report including Randy Wichman, Isaac Kaiu, Kemamo Hookano, Aletha Kaohi, LaFrance Kapaka-Arboleda, Sabra Kauka, Linda Moriarty, George Mukai, Jo Prigge, Healani Trembath, Martha Yent, Jiro Yukimura, Joanne Yukimura, and Taka Sokei. Interviews were conducted by Tina Bushnell. Background research was carried out by Tina Bushnell, Dr. Vicki Creed and David Shideler. Acknowledgements also go to Mary Requilman of the Kaua‘i Historical Society and the Bishop Museum Archives staff who were helpful in navigating their respective collections for maps and photographs. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of Work............................................................................................................ 1 B. Methods......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erythrina Gall Wasp
    State of Hawaii New Pest Advisory DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE No. 05-03 Updated December 2008 Erythrina Gall Wasp Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Ronald A. Heu, Dick M. Tsuda*, Walter T. Nagamine, Juliana A. Yalemar and M. Tremblay Troy H. Suh Figure 1. Enlarged photo of an adult female erythrina gall wasp. Actual length of the female is 1.5 mm. The adult male wasp, not shown, measures 1.0 mm. Introduction. Samples of gall-damaged leaves and stems of the coral tree, Erythrina variegata L., were first collected in Manoa, Oahu, on April 19, 2005, by a University of Hawaii graduate student. The galls were found to have been induced by the larvae of a tiny wasp which was subsequently identified as the erythrina gall wasp (EGW), Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim (family Eulophidae) by J. La Salle of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) in Australia. R. Heu Figure 2. Erythrina variegata leaves exhibiting light gall wasp Erythrina variegata, with its bright red flowers, is damage (left) compared with undamaged leaves (right). also known as tigers claw, Indian coral tree, and wiliwili-haole. It is a common landscape tree in Hawaii. A tall, columnar form of E. variegata, “Tropic Coral,” known locally as “tall erythrina” or “tall wiliwili,” is also used as a windbreak for soil and water conservation and for planting around farmsteads (Rotar et al. 1986). R. Heu T. Suh Figure 3. Erythrina petioles Figure 4. “Tall erythrina” * College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources and leaflets exhibiting severe trees with severe gall (CTAHR), University of Hawaii at Manoa gall wasp damage.
    [Show full text]