Arxiv:2012.09139V2 [Cond-Mat.Soft] 22 May 2021 Jamming and Force Chains [17–20]

Thermodynamics of ﬂuctuations based on time-and-space averages

James E. McClure Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg

Steﬀen Berg Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Grasweg 31, 1031HW Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Ryan T. Armstrong University of New South Wales, Sydney (Dated: May 25, 2021) We develop non-equilibrium theory by using averages in time and space as a generalized way to upscale thermodynamics in non-ergodic systems. The approach offers a classical perspective on the energy dynamics in fluctuating systems. The rate of entropy production is shown to be explicitly scale dependent when considered in this context. We show that while any stationary process can be represented as having zero entropy production, second law constraints due to the Clausius theorem are preserved due to the fact that heat and work are related based on conservation of energy. As a demonstration we consider the energy dynamics for the Carnot cycle and for Maxwell’s demon. We then consider non-stationary processes, applying time-and-space averages to characterize non- ergodic effects in heterogeneous systems where energy barriers such as compositional gradients are present. We show that the derived theory can be used to understand the origins of anomalous diffusion phenomena in systems where Fick’s law applies at small length scales but not at large length scales. We then characterize fluctuations in capillary-dominated systems, which are non- stationary due to the irreversibility of cooperative events.

Introduction

The ergodic hypothesis is central to many results of statistical physics. The basic premise is that a system will explore all possible energetic micro-states if considered over a sufficiently long interval of time. The concept of ergodicity is thereby linked with the mixing of information within a system [1]. Canonical proofs of the ergodic hypothesis rely on the equivalence of spatial, temporal and ensemble averages in the limit of infinite time [2, 3]. Scale considerations and the rate of mixing necessarily FIG. 1. The length scale for ergodicity can be estimated based constrain the applicability of the ergodic hypothesis when √ on Dτm, the mean distance for diffusion over timescale τm. considering finite regions of time, particularly for systems We consider heterogeneous systems where the ergodic hypoth- where mixing is slow compared to the physical timescale esis holds at the scale of V, but not at the larger scale of Ω. of interest [4]. Many physical systems are known to exhibit behavior that is inconsistent with the ergodic hypothesis. Well-known examples include anomalous dif- non-equilibrium description due to spatial and temporal fusion in biological systems [5–7], glassy systems [8–10], deviations associated with intensive thermodynamic vari- capillary phenomena and nucleation [11–16] and granu- ables. Our approach is rooted in classical thermodynam- lar systems where multiscale effects are present due to ics and offers a formally distinct perspective on fluctua-

arXiv:2012.09139v2 [cond-mat.soft] 22 May 2021 jamming and force chains [17–20]. A common element tions as compared to statistical theory, e.g. [21–25]. The for these systems is that they involve spatially heteroge- presented methods can be a general tool for understand- neous materials where available thermal energy is insuffi- ing how energy dynamics translate across length and time cient to overcome internal energy barriers. This inhibits scales. First we consider a basic example, demonstrating mixing and prevents the system from exploring all possi- that the Carnot cycle and Maxwell’s demon can be in- ble micro-states within the timescale of interest. terpreted in terms of energy fluctuations. Then we con- In this paper, we demonstrate that time-and-space av- sider mass transport phenomena in the context where eraging can be applied as a mechanism to mathematically Fick’s law applies at a small length scale but fails at mix information at the desired scale, providing a natural larger scales. Finally, the approach will be applied to path forward in systems where non-ergodic effects are non-equilibrium behavior in multiphase systems, where encountered. Multiscale fluctuation terms arise in the fluctuations occur due to capillary effects and confine- 2 ment. How to characterize and interpret these fluctu- than the molecular length scale. At the scale of V, the ations has been a long-standing problem for immiscible theoretical bridge between the molecular and hydrody- fluid flow in porous media, and has broad applications to namic description can be provided by statistical theory, other systems [28–37]. relying on the validity of the ergodic hypothesis [42]. Eq. 3 can then be rescaled to treat extensive measures on a per-unit-volume basis, Time-and-space averaged thermodynamics U S X = T + Y i . (6) A classical thermodynamic description is defined by V V i V considering the internal energy to depend on the entropy S as well as other extensive physical properties of the As depicted in Figure 1, we wish to develop theory system, Xi (e.g. volume, number of particles, etc.) [38– that holds over some arbitrarily larger spatial region Ω 40] (with volume V > V), and time interval Λ (with duration λ ≥ τm). While the ergodic hypothesis must hold U = U(S, X1,X2,...,Xn) . (1) at the scale of V, the system may be non-ergodic when considered at the larger scale of Ω. Due to the potential Intensive quantities are then defined according to Euler’s failure of the ergodic hypothesis statistical mechanics is homogeneous function theorem, less well-suited to derive relevant hydrodynamic theory ∂U ∂U at at larger scales. In this situation is desirable to de- T = ,Yi = , (2) fine averages such that the ergodic hypothesis applies at ∂S X ∂X S,X i i j6=i a small scale but not at larger scales. To define larger such that scale measures we apply the time-and-space averaging operator U = TS + YiXi (3) Z Z 1 describes the internal energy of the system at equi- f ≡ fdV dt . (7) λV Λ Ω librium. In practice, measurements of thermodynamic quantities are averages carried out over some finite re- We note that this convention does not define an ensem- gion of space and time. The measurement time τm can ble average, but instead represents an explicit average be used to infer the size of the region where local equi- over a region in time and space. The integral is there- librium conditions exist. For example, if a thermome- fore constructed to include the actual dynamics of the ter is used to measure the temperature, any material system, such that insights into the system behavior can that is close enough to the measurement point can be be inferred based on conservation of energy with mini- considered to be in local equilibrium with the measured mal assumptions. Averages are defined such that exten- value. Diffusive mechanisms are responsible for mixing sive quantities retain the same physical meaning across energy within the system, since it is the movement of scales, the molecules and their interaction with each other that creates ergodic conditions. Given a fixed timescale τm, U ≡ U , S ≡ S , Xi ≡ Xi . (8) an associated length scale is obtained from the Einstein relation, which predicts the mean squared displacement The intensive quantities are then defined as a weighted (MSD) for molecular trajectories x(t), average with the conjugated extensive quantity from Eq.

Z τm 8, 2 x (t)dt ∼ Dτm , (4) 0 TS XiYi T ≡ , Y i ≡ . (9) where D is the diffusion coefficient. Since MSD predicts S Xi the average distance that molecules drift within time τm, the system is locally well-mixed at that length scale. Er- These definitions ensure that the representation of the godic behavior should therefore be observed within a sur- system energy is scale-consistent, e.g., the product of en- rounding spherical region with volume tropy and temperature corresponds to the thermal energy [41]. Since entropy is additive, the temperature should 4π 3/2 V ≤ (Dτm) . (5) be defined as the average thermal energy per unit of en- 3 tropy. The averaged form is thus consistent with Eq. 3,

During the elapsed time τm, molecules will explore a spatial region with size V such that spatial, temporal and en- U = T S + XiY i . (10) semble averages are interchangeable at this scale. Smaller V can be chosen as long as the deﬁned region is larger Non-equilibrium behavior can be considered by aver- 3

FIG. 2. Carnot cycle as a fluctuation: time averaging around the entire cycle result in constant average values of the entropy, S and temperature T ; volume V and pressure p. For any cyclic process a stationary time series will be obtained for all thermodynamic quantities. Using a time average the energy dynamics can be embedded within fluctuation terms that capture the net energy contribution over the cycle. aging the differential form of Eq. 3 intensive variables deviate non-linearly from their average values within the spatial region Ω and time interval ∂U D ∂S E D ∂X E = T + Y i Λ. ∂t ∂t i ∂t ∂S D ∂S E = T + (T − T ) ∂t ∂t The Carnot Cycle as a Fluctuation ∂Xi D ∂Xi E +Y i + (Yi − Y i) . (11) ∂t ∂t Spatial averages have been explored extensively in We now define multiscale deviation terms as the context of classical non-equilibrium thermodynamics [41]. Extending this approach to also include time av- 0 0 T ≡ T − T,Yi ≡ Yi − Y i . (12) erages provides a way to smooth the temporal dynamics of the system. To illustrate how this works, we consider Using the definitions from Eqs. 8 and 9 we can show that the familiar example of the Carnot cycle, as depicted in D ∂S E D ∂T 0 E D ∂X E D ∂Y 0 E Figure 2. The cycle begins at time t0 and completes at T 0 = − S , Y 0 i = − X i . ∂t ∂t i ∂t i ∂t time tf , repeating in periodic fashion. The time average (13) does not depend on the region of time Λ as long as the which can be substituted into Eq. 11 and rearranged to duration λ is an integer multiple of the period tf − t0. obtain an entropy inequality We choose λ = tf − t0 so that 1/λ corresponds to the cy-

0 0 cle frequency. For the Carnot cycle the thermodynamic ∂S 1 h∂U ∂Xi D ∂T E D ∂Yi E i = − Y i + S + Xi ≥ 0 . state is described by U(S, V ). The non-equilibrium be- ∂t T ∂t ∂t ∂t ∂t havior is described in an average form according to Eq. | {z } fluctuation terms 14, (14) ∂U ∂S ∂V D ∂T 0 E D ∂p0 E − T + p + S − V = 0 , (15) The result is easily recognizable as the fundamental rela- ∂t ∂t ∂t ∂t ∂t tion of non-equilibrium thermodynamics (e.g. [43]), but with additional terms associated with fluctuations. The where U, S, V , T and p are time-and-space average values fluctuations contribute to the energy dynamics whenever for the complete cycle. Since the associated time series is 4 stationary, these are each constant when the time aver- the scaling behavior for dominant physical processes. For aging interval is an integer multiple of λ = tf − t0. This any stationary process the rate of entropy production will means that be zero if the dynamics are considered over a sufficiently long timescale. We note that this does not contradict the ∂U ∂S ∂V = 0 , = 0 , = 0 . (16) Clausius theorem, since the relationship between the rate ∂t ∂t ∂t of of heat added and the rate of work is unchanged based In other words, S, V , T and p are the average values on the time average. In other words a scale-consistent around which the system is fluctuating, as shown in Fig. representation of the energy dynamics is recovered. 2a –f. The energy dynamics are fully described by the relationship between the fluctuations, Fluctuations of Maxwell’s demon D ∂p0 E D ∂T 0 E V = S . (17) ∂t ∂t We now separately consider each fluctuation. First, the pressure fluctuation is identical to the rate of pressure volume work W (with the sign convention chosen to obtain positive external work), D ∂p0 E D ∂V E D∂W E V = − p = . (18) ∂t ∂t ∂t This is a consequence of the fact that the averages p and V are each constant. The pressure fluctuation therefore directly corresponds to the power output. Next we treat the temperature fluctuation. For the Carnot cycle all temperature changes occur during isentropic conditions. Using the additive property for the time integral, it is FIG. 3. “Maxwell’s demon” considers a thought experiment straightforward to show that in which a demon selectively permits the migration of hot molecules from one chamber to the other. Due to the heat D ∂T 0 E D ∂T E S = S flux carried by the transmitted molecules, the temperature ∂t ∂t of the hot chamber increases, leading to a thermal gradient ! between the chambers. The demon’s actions are constrained 1 Z t2 ∂T Z tf ∂T = Sa dt + Sb dt by a symmetry law relating thermal fluctuations. λ t1 ∂t t3 ∂t 1 = (Sb − Sa)(Th − Tc) . (19) To further illustrate the role of fluctuations, we con- λ sider the actions of Maxwell’s demon based on the two- Inserting these into Eq. 15 and using the fact that the chamber system shown in Figure 3 [44, 45]. The de- heat added to the system is given by Qh = Th(Sb − Sa) mon operates a gate, selectively allowing fast-moving we obtain molecules to move from the cold chamber to the hot chamber. In apparent violation of thermodynamic intu- D∂W E 1 Q (T − T ) = h h c . (20) ition, the associated transfer of kinetic energy increases ∂t λ T h the temperature of the hot chamber. Maxwell’s de- This is identical to the standard result for the efficiency mon can be considered in the context of non-ergodic of a Carnot engine, but is formulated as an expression for behavior, as the demon controls the mixing of informa- the power output based on the cycle frequency λ. This tion between the two chambers. The demon defines lo- demonstrates that in a time averaged formulation, any cally non-stationary behavior by applying molecular scale energy dynamics that occur faster than the duration for rules that prevent prevent a forward process from reach- the time averaging window will be re-cast as fluctuations. ing equilibrium with the corresponding reverse process. Since the integral defined by Eq. 7 explicitly accounts for However, this does not mean the process is irreversible; the path of the system, the energy dynamics are fully cap- it only means that the equilibrium has been delayed. We tured by the homogenized representation. With respect will show that if a conservative demon is disabled, the to the second law of thermodynamics, a critical insight system will return to it’s original state. Fluctuations are from this exercise is that the interpretation of the entropy an appropriate tool for understanding the energy dynam- is scale dependent, since the rate of entropy production ics in such a system. Furthermore, the system is spatially depends explicitly on the timescale at which a process is heterogeneous, and the chambers can be denoted as sub- considered. This will be particularly important in het- regions of the system, Ωh and Ωc. Based on these def- erogeneous systems where the are crossover times due to initions a discrete aspect is introduced into the system 5 representation, since the crossing of molecules from one For simplicity we consider the case where volume for each sub-region to the other occur as discrete events. Time chamber is constant, with Vc = Vh. These definitions averaging smooths the effect of these crossings such that ensure that the entropy is additive, the action of the demon can be modeled as being continuous with respect to time. S = Sc + Sh , (26) For an ideal monatomic gas the entropy is given by the Sackur-Tetrode equation [47–49] and that the total thermal energy is conserved based on the definition of the temperature, " # 5 V 3 U 3 2πm S(U, V, N) = k N + ln + ln + ln , B 2 N 2 N 2 h2 T S = T cSc + T hSh . (27) (21) For the number of molecules and chemical potential, where m is the particle mass and h is Planck’s constant. The expression for entropy as a state function is suffi- µN = µcN c + µhN h . (28) cient to determine the form U(S, V, N). The intensive quantities can be determined directly from their thermo- It is clear that generic thermodynamic quantities can be dynamic definitions defined by sub-setting a heterogeneous system into regions. The result of the sub-setting operation is func- ! ∂U 2U tionally equivalent to an alternative specification of the T ≡ = , ∂S 3kBN extensive variables, N,V ! ∂U k NT U = U(Sh,Sc,Vh,Vc,Nh,Nc) . (29) p ≡ − = B , ∂V V N,S However, since the set operation defined from Υi intro- ! ∂U V 3 U 3 2πm duces a discrete element into the system representation, µ ≡ = −k T ln + + ln . ∂N B N 2 N 2 h2 apparent discontinuities can result when considering en- S,V ergy exchanges between the entities. Averaging in time (22) removes these discontinuities to ensure a smooth repre- 3 sentation for the dynamics within sub-regions. As an Noting that U = 2 kBNT for an ideal gas, it is easy to show these forms are consistent with Eq. 2 in the particu- example, even though the Hamiltonian for the molecular form U = TS−pV +µN. To treat the demon we must lar system is continuous, the molecular crossing shown subdivide the system based on thermodynamics within in Figure 3 is a discrete event. Combining the sub-set each chamber. This is accomplished by sub-setting the operation with a time average leads to a corresponding fluctuation theorem because any energy gained by the system into regions based on the indicator function Υi hot chamber is directly lost by the cold chamber. The 1 if x ∈ Ωi fluctuation terms impose a symmetry constraint on the Υi(x) = (23) 0 otherwise demon’s action on the basis that the demon must con- for i ∈ {h, c}. Consistent with Eqs. 8 and 9, separate serve mass and energy. temperature, entropy, pressure, chemical potential and Since the system is closed the total number of particles number of molecules are obtained for each chamber. For is conserved, extensive properties, fields are constructed based on the ∂N ∂N subset operation, h = − c . (30) ∂t ∂t S SΥ N NΥ i ≡ i , i ≡ i ,V = VΥ , (24) V V V V i i Subdivision of the system into hot and cold compart- ments leads to the following fluctuation constraint based where V has been included explicitly in the definitions on conservation of energy, to account for the fact that the reference volume used to define fields should not be infinitely small (i.e. should " 0 0 0 # ∂S 1 X D ∂Ti E D ∂pi E D ∂µi E exceed the molecular length scale). Averages are then = Si − Vi + Ni ∂t T ∂t ∂t ∂t defined as time-and-space averages i

µh − µc ∂N c TSi + , (31) Si ≡ Si , T i ≡ , T ∂t Si where T 0 = T − T , µ0 = µ − µ, and p0 = p − p on Ω pVi i i i i i i i V i ≡ Vi , p ≡ , with i ∈ {c, h}. i V i It has been argued from an information theory perspec-

µNi tive that the demon must be able to perform measure- N i ≡ Ni , µi ≡ . (25) Ni ments in order to function as described by Maxwell [46]. 6

FIG. 4. Fluctuations due to operation of a conservative Maxwell’s demon: the demon is activated at t = 0 second and de- activated at time t = 1.0 second to obtain a stationary time series. Fluctuations to the intensive properties are observed based on the redistribution of mass and energy within the system.

For example, the demon would need to know the tem- As Tc decreases, so too will the rate at which sufficiently perature of the hot chamber so that it could determine energetic molecules hit the gate. With the demon’s be- which molecules should pass through the gate. However, havior defined statistically based on Eq. 32 we can calcu- a simple thought experiment demonstrates that a demon late the rate for mass exchange. The number of particles can generate gradients without relying on any non-local moving from the cold chamber to the hot chamber is information or altering the energy for any molecules that Z ∞ r ∂Nch NcAg m −ms2/2k T it comes into contact with. Consider a demon that is = se B c ds , ∂t Vc vd 2πkBTc tuned to operate at some particular temperature Td. The r demon will allow any molecule with speed greater than NcAg kBTc −mv2/2k T = − e d B c . (33) one standard deviation above the mean for the Maxwell Vc 2πm distribution of speeds to pass from the cold chamber to where Ag is the area of the gate between chambers. Sim- the hot chamber, i.e. molecules with speed ilarly, the rate of energy exchange is Z ∞ r 3 r ∂Uch NcAg m ms 2 3kBTd = e−ms /2kB Tc ds , (34) vd ≥ . (32) ∂t V 2πk T 2 m c vd B c 3/2 ! 2 ! The statistics for the crossings can be determined from mNcAg kBTc mv −mv2/2k T = − √ 1 + d e d B c . the Maxwell distribution. If the demon operates at tem- Vc 2π m 2kBTc peratures in the vicinity of Td, it can drive the formation of a gradient without any knowledge of the system We consider a two-way valve so that a steady-state can be state. The demon only needs to measure the molecular achieved based on the redistribution of slower molecules speed, which may be done locally and reversibly without to the cold chamber. A simple way to achieve this is to retaining any memory of the measurement. Of course, allow any molecule that hits the gate to travel back to this action cannot be performed without a constraint: the cold chamber. This clearly requires no measurement molecules with sufficient speed must hit the portion of and meets the constraints used previously. The statistics the wall where the demon gate is located, since the de- for the particles gained by the cold chamber are given by r mon cannot impose any forces to attract particles toward ∂N N A k T hc = h g B h , (35) its location. The probability for fast molecules to hit the ∂t Vh 2πm demon gate depends on Tc based on the Maxwell distri- !3/2 ∂U mN A k T bution of speeds and also on the area of the gate relative hc = √ h g B h . (36) to the area of the partition between the two chambers. ∂t 2πVh m 7

Since the rules used to define this behavior do not re- timescale entropy production occurs based on the redis- quire non-local information, the demon will be able to tribution of mass an energy between the two chambers spatially segregate particles based on conservation of en- (see Fig. 4a). We note that molecular rules do not neces- ergy and without violating physical laws. Fast particles sarily need to satisfy positive entropy production, since will accumulate in the hot chamber, and slow particles entropy is a statistical concept that does not apply at the will accumulate in the cold chamber. The primary mech- deterministic scale of an individual molecule. However, anism needed to achieve this is to prevent slow molecules since no heat is added to the two-chamber system, the from entering the hot chamber. The role played by the Clausius theorem remains valid. Unlike the Carnot en- demon is therefore to delay equilibrium by preventing gine, the demon does not require added heat or work to energy from partitioning itself equally between the two generate the fluctuation. The demon is simply delaying chambers. Compared to the initial state, the forward the equilibrium of the system. Since no energy has been process (particles move from hot to cold) cannot reach removed from the system, it can be treated as a reversible an equilibrium with the reverse process (particles move process when considered over longer time intervals. from cold to hot). This produces a non-stationary pro- If the timescale for averaging is small, fluctuations to cess. However, since no energy is removed or added, sta- intensive properties will be zero based on the fact that tionary behavior can be restored by simply disabling the rate of change is locally linear over short timescales. demon. Fluctuation terms contribute when considering behavior We now treat the fluctuations that are created due over long timescales. At the end of the cycle, the en- to operation of the hypothetical demon. Based on Eqs. tropy and particle number returns exactly to their origi- 33 and 36 the total mass and energy exchange between nal value, meaning that chambers is defined for each timestep δt ∂S ∂N " r r # = 0 , c = 0. (39) NhAg kBTh NcAg kBTc −mv2/2k T ∂t ∂t δN = − e d B c δt , c V 2πm V 2πm h c In other words, zero entropy production is observed when " !3/2 the system is considered over the longer timescale. In- mAg kBTh δUc = √ Nh serting Eq. 39 into Eq. 31 leads to fluctuation criterion 2πVh m at long times !3/2 ! # 2 0 0 0 kBTc mv 2 d −mvd/2kB Tc D ∂Ti E D ∂pi E D ∂µi E −Nc 1 + e δt , Si − Vi + Ni = 0 . (40) m 2kBTc ∂t ∂t ∂t (37) This result simply means that thermal fluctuations must obey conservation of energy, consistent with results es- The energy and particle number are updated so that con- tablished from the perspective of microscopic reversibility servation is strictly obeyed [62, 63]. The result is a simple fluctuation theorem that

Nc(t + δt) ← Nc(t) + δNc , is distinct from approaches proposed by other treatments [50–55]. A basic challenge presented by Eq. 40 is that N (t + δt) ← N (t) − δN , h h c the fluctuation criterion depends on the total entropy, D 0 E Uc(t + δt) ← Uc(t) + δUc , ∂Ti since this is needed to compute Si . While the U (t + δt) ← U (t) − δU . (38) ∂t h h c Sackur-Tetrode equation provides an adequate approx- The system is closed by assuming that Eqs. 21 and 22 imation for an ideal gas, the situation for thermal fluc- hold separately within each sub-region. The initial con- tuations is not easily generalized. The demon illustrates dition sets equilibrium conditions in each chamber with two important features of systems where multi-scale fluc- 1 mol of Helium atoms equally divided between the two tuations are important. First, it defines an energy barrier chambers at Td = 298K. The demon is activated at t = 0 that prevents mixing between the hot and cold chambers. with δt = 0.00025 sec. The demon operates until t = 1.0 Second, the problem is associated with gradients in an in- second, ultimately reaching a steady-state. The differ- tensive thermodynamic property. We now demonstrate ence in pressures is accounted for by the differential mo- the importance of these terms in capillary-dominated sys- mentum transfer that results from the demons operation tems, where gradients in composition and chemical po- according to Eqs. 33 – 38. Once steady-state is achieved tential lead to length scale heterogeneity. the demon is disabled, and the system returns exactly to its initial state and producing a stationary time series. For the results shown in Fig. 4, the system is explic- Mass diffusion itly ergodic by construction, since the Maxwell distribution has been assumed (meaning equipartition of energy The advantages of time-and-space averaging are par- is strictly observed within each chamber). At this fast ticularly intriguing for spatially heterogeneous systems. 8

In this section we consider the application to mass diffu- assuming that Fick’s law holds at the microscopic scale sion, which is a common source of spatial heterogeneity. with ρk = Nk/V, we arrive at Compositional gradients are a key feature in these systems, and these heterogeneities cause fluctuations when 1 D ∂Nk E D E µk = µk∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) . (43) the system is stimulated. In such cases the fluctua- V ∂t tion terms can be directly linked to classical microscopic Inserting this into Eq. 42 it is evident that the dissipa- non-equilibrium thermodynamics using phenomenologi- tion is entirely determined from the contribution of the cal equations established based on the theory of Onsager spatial gradients. In other words, the length scale as- [56]. Phenomenological equations provide the basis to sociated with gradients is fundamentally linked with the establish the rates at which particular processes occur, timescale for energy dissipation based on the phenomeno- linking the temporal, spatial and energy scales. Fick’s logical coefficient. Furthermore, assuming Fick’s law at law can be directly recovered at length scales that are the microscopic scale does not imply it will hold at larger accessible based on molecular dynamics simulations [57]. scales. To see this we can formally average the right-hand In the context of Onsager, phenomenological equations side of Eq. 43, are derived based on a local near-equilibrium assumption. The associated reciprocal relations can be derived based D E 0 on an assumption of microscopic reversibility. These con- µk∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) = µk∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) + µk∇ · Dk · ∇ µk ditions are presumed to hold at the scale of V, since this D E D E +µ ∇ · (D0 · ∇µ ) + µ0 ∇ · (D · ∇µ ) . scale is defined based on the local diffusion coefficient. k k k k k k The relevant linear phenomenological equation is Fick’s law, which is assumed to describe the non-equilibrium Scale invariance for Fick’s law will therefore be obtained behavior at the small scale of V, if the following conditions are satisfied 0 ∂ρk ∇µk = 0 , (44) − ∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) = 0 , (41) ∂t D 0 E ∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) = 0 , (45) where Dk is the mass diffusion tensor, ρk is the density D 0 E and µk is chemical potential. Fick’s law asserts that there µk∇ · (Dk · ∇µk) = 0 , (46) is a locally linear non-equilibrium response to compositional gradients. However, we note that in a heteroge- 0 where the deviation for the diffusion tensor is Dk = Dk − neous system linear response theory will fail at larger Dk. In ideal systems the chemical potential is directly scales due to non-linearity in the composition, diffusion related to the density, coefficient and chemical potential. Such non-linearities will inevitably lead to anomalous diffusion phenomena, µ = µ0 + RT ln(ρ/ρ0) , (47) and associated non-equilibrium behaviors can be understood in terms of multi-scale fluctuations. with µ0 and ρ0 being constant reference values. Ideal Standard non-equilibrium treatment for mass diffu- conditions imply that Eq. 44 must hold due to the def- sion is obtained by considering the internal energy to inition of ρk. Eq. 45 will hold if Dk is independent of be described by U(S, N ), with N being the number of 0 k k space and time, since this would mean that Dk = 0. Fi- molecules of component k. For a closed system Eq. 14 nally, Eq. 46 suggests that the existence of gradients can be written as in Dk or µk that have a length scale smaller than Ω will " 0 0 # cause Fick’s law to fail at the averaged scale, as will tran- ∂S 1 D ∂T E ∂N k D ∂µk E = S − µk + Nk ≥ 0 . (42) sient changes to these gradients that occur faster than the ∂t T ∂t ∂t ∂t averaging timescale Λ. At the intuitive level, these crite- ria require that the diffusion coefficient, composition and In an isothermal system the temperature fluctuation is chemical potential should vary only linearly over Λ and zero. The remaining terms can be directly interpreted Ω. For such cases the fluctuation terms disappear and based on Fick’s law, Fick’s law will hold in the larger-scale system. However, ∂N D ∂µ0 E ∂N D ∂(µ − µ )E in real systems non-Fickian behaviour is quite common µ k − N k = µ k − N k k k ∂t k ∂t k ∂t k ∂t [58–60]. Diffusive and dispersive processes within com- ∂N ∂µ D ∂µ E plex micro-structure give rise to the development of het- = µ k + N k − N k k ∂t k ∂t k ∂t erogeneous structures, including fractals, based on local instabilities and material heterogeneity [61]. The impli- ∂(µkN k) ∂ µkNk D ∂Nk E = − + µk . cation is that Eqs. 44 and 45 do not hold under typical ∂t ∂t ∂t conditions, since mass transport routinely leads to tran- The first two terms cancel based on the fact that µ N k = sient spatial heterogeneity for the composition, chemical k µkNk according to the definition given in Eq. 9. Now potential, and diffusion coefficient. 9

Capillary ﬂuctuations

In heterogeneous systems it is common for chemical potential gradients to exist at multiple length scales. Mul- tiphase systems arise due to the dependence of µ on composition, e.g. in the Cahn-Hilliard equations,

µ = φ3 − φ − γ∇2φ . (48)

∗ ∗ The order parameter φ = ρ − (ρl + ρg)/2, where the ∗ equilibrium densities for the liquid and gas are ρl and ∗ ρg. The parameter γ determines the width of the interface separating the two pure phase regions. It is entirely possible to describe multiphase systems using Eq. 48 in combination with Eq. 42. As a matter of convenience, we can also describe the thermodynamics of the system by considering Eq. 2 in the form

U = U(S, Vw,Vn,Awn) , (49) where Vw and Vn are the volume of the droplet and the FIG. 5. Droplet coalescence leads to fluctuations in the pres- surrounding fluid and Awn is the interfacial area between sure field (color) due to the rapid change in capillary forces. fluids. The associated intensive variables are the pres- Scaling for the coalescence event is limited by viscous forces sures p and p and the interfacial tension γ . Averag- during the initial bridge formation, and is dominated by in- w n wn ertial forces at late times. ing in time and space we assume: (1) isothermal conditions; (2) constant interfacial tension; (3) the volume of each fluid is constant; and (4) compositional effects are two distinct regimes [70]. At early times, viscous effects negligible. Subject to these restrictions Eq. 14 simplifies dominate and the growth of the bridge radius scales as to r t 0 0 ∼ , (52) ∂S 1 hD ∂pw E D ∂pn E ∂Awn i rc τc = − Vw + Vn + γ ≥ 0 . ∂t T ∂t ∂t wn ∂t (50) where τc is the crossover time and rc is the associated Dissipative effects are understood by considering the fluc- length scale. At late times, inertial effects dominate and tuation of the fluid pressures that are induced by the the growth of the bridge radius scales as spontaneous change in surface energy. r r t The coalescence of two fluid droplets represents one ∼ . (53) r τ the simplest examples of topological change in fluid me- c c chanics. The topological event induces an apparent sin- Analogous results have been obtained for droplet snap-off gularity followed by a cascade of energy dissipation gov- [37]. The rate of entropy production will be a non-linear erned by distinct scaling regimes as the system estab- function of time based on the crossover between the two lishes a new equilibrium. At equilibrium, the fluid pres- regimes. The non-equilibrium response is therefore non- sures and interface curvature are related based on the linear. Averaging in time and space can be applied to Young-Laplace equation homogenize these non-linear dynamics so that they can ! be treated explicitly as energy fluctuations. 1 1 The sequence depicted in Fig. 5 shows the effect of the pn − pw = γwn + , (51) R1 R2 coalescence event on the fluid pressure field as simulated by a lattice Boltzmann model [73]. Results demonstrate where R1 and R2 are the principal curvatures along the that simulation accurately recovers the predicted scaling ∗ interface between fluids. Detailed studies of the droplet behavior. In Fig. 5 the pressure field pi = piRf /γwn, is coalescence mechanism show that the flow behavior and normalized relative to the final droplet radius, Rf = 80 associated geometric evolution are coupled on a very fast voxels. Non-equilibrium effects develop in response to the timescale [64–71]. At the molecular level, coalescence is near instantaneous curvature disruption along the inter- initiated based on thermal effects [72]. Hydrodynamic face at the point where the droplets first touch. The asso- effects become dominant after approximately 30 picosec- ciated pressure shock drives the ensuing dynamics. The onds, based on the formation of a bridge that joins the behavior is non-ergodic because capillary energy barriers droplets. The ensuing dynamics can be separated into inhibit the thermal mixing between the droplets prior to 10 the event. Rapid mixing occurs after coalescence, once ing property of the physical system itself. Set operations the energy barrier separating the two droplets has been are the basis for separately defining pw and pn. Detailed destroyed. balance is not evident when the fluids are considered sep- Thermal fluctuations due to molecular effects are usu- arately, since irreversible energy exchanges occur between ally assumed to be stationary with respect to time as a the fluids due to cooperative rearrangement of the inter- consequence of the time reversibility of the Hamiltonian face. For this reason symmetry is a property of the global at the molecular level [22]. Capillary fluctuations are dis- system and not a property of the sub-regions. tinct from thermal fluctuations due to the fact that they Pressure fluctuations are multiscale rate effects that are inherently cooperative in nature, are linked to both arise due to spatial heterogeneity. The length scale as- reversible and irreversible energy transfer. Symmetry- sociated with the heterogeneity is the driving factor that breaking is a consequence of the structural rearrangement determines the spectral properties. Due to length scale associated with the transition to a new local minimum effects the noise signature associated with capillary fluc- energy configuration. For a closed system the dissipated tuations is distinct from pink noise, where the relation- energy is easily calculated from the initial and final con- ship between the spectral density SP and frequency F is figurations, since at equilibrium the droplets are spheri- SP ∼ 1/F [74–76]. For the data shown in Fig. 6, the cal, time and energy scales are non-dimensionalized as described previously. A simple power law is insufficient to 1 ∆S = Vw∆pw + Vn∆pn − γwn∆Awn . (54) describe noise due to capillary fluctuations. Instead, we T find that the scaling relationship is a stretched exponen- The radius for the initial and final droplets can be com- tial, puted analytically based on the volume, making use of log S ∼ αF p . (55) the Young-Laplace equation to determine the equilibrium P fluid pressures. The coefficients α and p are associated with the rate The rate of energy change associated with capillary of decay in the spectral density as the frequency in- fluctuations is shown in Figure 6. The timescale is nor- creases. SP decays rapidly with F for frequencies that malized by the crossover time, τc, which can be consid- are faster than a typical event. This can be considered ered as defining the intrinsic timescale for coalescence. as a transition between two distinct scaling regimes. At In our analysis, the full system is used as the domain for the length and time scale for the coalescence event the spatial averaging and the time interval is Λ = 0.108τc. behavior is super-diffusive based on the fact that coop- Since this timescale is faster than the non-linear dynam- erative capillary forces move mass faster than the local ics, the frequency for the fluctuations is directly visible in diffusion rate. Ultimately the capillary forces that drive Figure 6a. The energy scale is normalized based on the these events originate due to gradients in composition at interfacial tension and the capillary length scale, which smaller scales. At smaller length scales sub-diffusive be- is accomplished by dividing the energy associated with havior is obtained based on the strong anti-diffusion asso- 2 capillary fluctuations final surface energy 4πγwnRf . The ciated with the interface region. The crossover between scales in Fig. 6 are therefore non-dimensional. From Eq. these distinct scaling regimes leads to a corresponding 50 it is clear that the changes in surface energy are driv- transition in the fluctuation spectrum. For droplet co- ing the fluctuations. Immediately after coalescence, in- alescence α = −15 and p = 1/2 match well with the terfaces perform local work against the fluid pressure due simulated fluctuation spectrum. to unbalanced capillary forces. The pressure fluctuation The scaling relationship given by Eq. 55 also holds terms are understood as resulting from local gradients in for immiscible displacement in porous media. Cooper- the pressure field that are generated due to the curva- ative events occur routinely as fluids migrate through ture discontinuity. These gradients are clearly visible in complex micro-structure under the influence of capillary Fig. 5. Since the initial and final droplet states have dif- forces [31]. Experimental data demonstrates that the ferent capillary pressure, the pressure fluctuation is not timescale for these events is directly linked to the fre- stationary over the event. Nevertheless, a degree of sym- quency for fluctuations in the pressure signal [77]. Re- metry is clear based on the mirroring effect between the sults shown in Fig. 7 were obtained using synchrotron pressure fluctuation in one fluid and the other. This sug- micro-tomography imaging. For complete experimental gests that the choice to represent the system in a discrete details the reader is referred to Berg et al. [28]. The way introduces asymmetry into the system description. system was initially saturated with brine, and oil was The Gibb’s dividing surface sub-divides the system into injected into the sample at a rate of 0.35 µL/minute. distinct sub-regions for each fluid, each with its own pres- Pressure transducer measurements were collected at an sure. While topological changes such as droplet coales- interval ∆t = 0.32 sec. The absolute permeability for the cence are fundamentally discrete events when considered Berea sandstone was κ = 0.7 µm2. Initial and final states from the perspective of set theory, set construction is a for a pore-scale event known as a Haines jump are shown choice imposed on the system, as opposed to an underly- in Fig. 7A and 7B. Haines jumps are spontaneous events 11

FIG. 6. Pressure fluctuation due to the coalescence of two fluid droplets. (A) rate of energy change associated with pressure fluctuation relative to the final surface energy during droplet coalescence event; and (B) noise spectrum associated with capillary p fluctuations can be predicted by log SP ∼ αF . that occur when the fluid meniscus passes through nar- coalescence events depends on how mass is distributed row pore throats within the solid micro-structure, where within the solid micro-structure. Further study is needed the capillary pressure is high. As fluid spontaneously to understand if universal coefficients can be established flows into the adjacent pore body, the capillary pressure in heterogeneous systems. As in droplet coalescence, the drops rapidly causing a fluctuation in the signal. The pressure fluctuations are non-stationary. For the data timescale for pore-scale events is controlled by the solid shown in Fig. 7 the net contribution from fluctuations micro-structure, which means that the statistics for the is 7.84% of the total pressure-volume work when consid- associated noise signal are linked to length scale hetero- ered over Λ = 512 seconds. In this situation fluctuation geneity within the system. In spite of this considerable terms must be included explicitly in the non-equilibrium complexity, the scaling behavior is predicted from Eq. 55 thermodynamics, since these terms are needed to state with identical coefficients to the droplet coalescence. In conservation of energy for the system. the spectral analysis, a non-dimensional timescale for the experiments can be defined as Summary and Conclusions γ t t∗ = wn√ , (56) µ κ We derive non-equilibrium thermodynamic expres- 2 where µ = 0.89 mN · s/m and γwn = 25 mN/m. Since sions using time-and-space averaging, showing that fluc- the permeability is related to the microscopic length tuations occur due to non-linear dynamics associated scale, a non-dimensional energy scale can be defined by with the intensive variables. Considering a particular normalizing based on γwnκ. Averaging over a longer time timescale of interest, the approach is constructed to treat interval reduces the amplitude of the fluctuations, but systems that are ergodic at small length scales but non- does not change α and p. Both droplet coalescence and ergodic at larger scales. Time and space averages are Haines jump events are examples of critical phenomena. formulated by directly integrating the energy dynamics, The length scale for an individual Haines jump is con- meaning that the actual system evolution is captured trolled by the solid microstructure, and a single event within the averaged representation. The approach is may cause fluids to invade multiple pores very rapidly, scale-consistent based on the fact that thermodynamic as shown in Fig. 7A–B. The timescale for pressure fluc- quantities retain their physical meaning, and the form tuations is therefore determined based on the distribu- of the Euler equation will independent of the length and tion of length scales for the solid microstructure, which time scales. Fluctuations are linked with sub-scale gra- is typically very heterogeneous. It should be expected dients in systems that exhibit multiscale heterogeneity. that the distribution of fluids will exert strong influence When stimulated, these systems have a tendency to relax on the fluctuation spectrum, as the probability for fluid toward equilibrium at macroscopically slow timescales 12

FIG. 7. Capillary fluctuations during displacement in porous media are linked with spontaneous pore-scale events that occur due to capillary forces within the solid micro-structure. Haines jumps occur spontaneously during immiscible displacement as the system “jumps” from (A) one energy minimum to (B) the next; (C) fluid pressure fluctuations arise due to these dynamics; and (D) scaling behavior for the power spectrum is independent of the time averaging interval. determined based on the length scale associated with More generally, fluctuations describe the internal en- the gradients. We illustrate how anomalous diffusion can ergy dynamics of thermodynamic systems away from arise in a system where Fick’s law applies at some small equilibrium. Since fluctuations must conserve energy, length scale, but fails at larger scales due spatial het- symmetry laws can be derived relating fluctuations erogeneity. Explicit conditions for scale invariance are within heterogeneous systems. These statements gov- obtained. ern the possible energy transfers that can occur within Averages in time demonstrate that the rate of entropy non-equilibrium systems. In contrast with thermal fluc- production is scale dependent, e.g. due to crossover times tuations, multiscale fluctuations are linked with coopera- that are frequently encountered when considering the tive events and therefore may not obey detailed balance. dynamic response of heterogeneous systems. For any Non-stationary fluctuations occur when there are net en- stationary process, the time average of the rate of energy transfers within a system. We consider droplet co- tropy production is zero, since net changes to any ther- alescence as a clear example of a non-equilibrium sys- modynamic state function imply that a system is non- tem where multiple crossover times are present. In con- stationary. Averaging does not alter the interpretation trast with a thermodynamic cycle, droplet coalescence is for the Clausius theorem, since averages are constructed non-stationary based on the fact that entropy produc- based on conservation of energy. Treatment of station- tion occurs. Considering coalescence along with immis- ary processes is thereby simplified, since dissipation is ex- cible displacement in porous media, we show that cap- pressed in terms of the rate of work and heat exchange, illary fluctuations can be predicted by a simple scaling p which are linked to fluctuations based on the internal law, log SP ∼ αF , with α = −15 and p = 1/2 match- energy dynamics of the system. We consider basic appli- ing the fluctuation spectrum in both cases. Multiscale cations to the Carnot cycle and to Maxwell’s demon to fluctuations are extensible to other systems where gradi- illustrate how thermodynamic cycles can can be under- ents in composition, chemical potential, and other inten- stood in the context of fluctuations. sive variables are operative at a scale smaller than the 13 scale of interest. Classes of non-ergodic behavior that S. A. Koehler, S. J. DeCamp, B. Lan, J. H. Kim, R. are defined by macroscopically slow physics are particu- Hirsch, A. F. Pegoraro, K. H. Lee, J. R. Starr, D. A. larly relevant. The formulation is based on classical ther- Weitz, A. C. Martin, J.-A. Park, J. P. Butler and J. J. modynamic theory, and defines fluctuations in terms of Fredberg, Nature Phys. 14, 613 (2018). [21] H. B. Callen and T. A. Welton. Phys. Rev., 83, 34 standard quantities that are straightforward to measure (1951). in a practical setting. [22] R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 12, 570 (1957). [23] J. Prost, J.-F. Joanny, and J. M. R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 090601, (2009). Acknowledgements [24] C. Maes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 208001 (2020). [25] D. H. Wolpert, Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 200602, (2020). ‘An award of computer time was provided by the De- [26] N. R. Morrow, Indust. Eng. Chem., 62, 32 (1970). [27] R. T. Armstrong and S. Berg, Phys. Rev. E, 88, 043010, partment of Energy Summit Early Science program. This (2013). research also used resources of the Oak Ridge Leader- [28] S. Berg, H. Ott, S.A. Klapp, A. Schwing, R. Neiteler, N. ship Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Sci- Brussee, A. Makurat, L. Leu, F. Enzmann, J. Schwarz, ence User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05- M. Kersten, S. Irvine, and M. Stampanoni, Proc. Natl. 00OR22725. µCT was performed on the TOMCAT Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 3755, (2013). beamline at the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Insti- [29] R.T. Armstrong RT, H. Ott, A. Georgiadis, M. Rücker, tut, Villigen, Switzerland. We are grateful to G. Mikul- A. Schwing and S. Berg, Water Resour. Res. 50 9162 (2014). jan at Swiss Light Source, whose outstanding efforts have [30] L. Cueto-Felgueroso and R. Juanes, Geophys. Res. Lett. made these experiments possible’ 43, 1615 (2015) [31] N.R. Morrow, Ind. Eng. Chem 63, 32 (1970). [32] S.M. Hassanizadeh and W.G. Gray, Adv. Water Res., 16, 53 (1993). [33] J. Bear and J.J. Nitao, Transp. Porous Med. 18, 151 [1] W. Parry, Topics in Ergodic Theory. Cambridge Tracts (1995). in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2004. [34] C. Marle, “Multiphase Flow in Porous Media”, Editions [2] J. v. Neumann, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 18 70 Technip (1981). (1932). [35] S.A. Aryana and A.R. Kovscek, Transp. Porous Med. [3] G. D. Birkhoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 17, 656 97, 373 (2013). (1931). [36] B. K. Primkulov, A.A. Pahlavan, X. Fu, B. Zhao, C.W. [4] R.G. Palmer, Adv. Phys. 31, 669 (1982). MacMinn and R. Juanes, J. Fluid Mech. 875, R4 (2019). [5] A V. Weigel, B. Simon, M. M. Tamkun and D. Krapf, [37] A. A. Pahlavan, H. A. Stone, G. H. McKinley and R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6438, 2011. Juanes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 13780 (2019). [6] M. Schwarzl, A. Godec and R. Metzler, Sci. Reports, 7, [38] H.B. Callen. Thermodynamics, (1960). 3878 (2017). [39] M. Grmela and H.C. Ottinger,¨ Phys. Rev. E. 56, 6620 [7] F. S. Gnesotto, F. Mura, J. Gladrow and C. P. Broedersz, (1997). Reports Prog. Phys., 81, 066601 (2018). [40] M. Grmela and H.C. Ottinger,¨ Phys. Rev. E. 56, 6633 [8] P. G. Debenedetti and F. H. Stillinger, Nature, 410, (1997). 159 (2001). [41] W.G. Gray and C.T. Miller, Introduction to the Thermo- [9] A. Crisanti and F. Ritort, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, dynamically Constrained Averaging Theory for Porous R181 (2003). Medium Systems. Springer, Zürich, (2014). [10] G. Tarjus, S. A. Kivelson, Z. Nussinov and P. Viot, J. [42] D. Froemberg and E. Barkai, Phys Rev E, 88, 2 (2013). Phys. Cond. Matter, 17, R1143 (2005). [43] S.R. De Groot and P. Mazur, Non-Equilibrium Thermo- [11] S.S. Datta, H. Chiang, T. S. Ramakrishnan and D. A. dynamics, Dover (2013). Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 064501, (2013). [44] James Clerk Maxwell. Theory of Heat. Cambridge Li- [12] V. D. Borman, A. A. Belogorlov, V. A. Byrkin and V. N. brary Collection - Physical Sciences. Cambridge Univer- Tronin. Phys. Rev. E, 88, 052116, (2013). sity Press, 2011. [13] D. Crandall, G. Ahmadi, M. Ferer and D. H. Smith, [45] Nature 20, 126 (1879). Physica A: Stat. Mech. App., 388, 574 (2009). [46] J. Earman, J. D. Norton, Studies in History and Philoso- [14] E. Kierlik, P. A. Monson, M. L. Rosinberg, L. Sarkisov phy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy and G. Tarjus, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87 055701 (2001). of Modern Physics, Volume 30, 1 (1999). [15] M. Winkler, M. Gjennestad, D. Bedeaux, S. Kjelstrup, R. [47] A. Ben-Naim, A Farewell to Entropy, (World Scien- Cabriolu and A. Hansen, Frontiers Phys., 8, 60 (2020). tific),(2008). [16] M. Iwamatsu. J. Chem. Phys. 134 164508 (2011). [48] O. Sackur Annalen der Physik, 36, 958 (1911). [17] A. Baule, F. Morone, H. J. Herrmann and H. A. Makse, [49] H. Tetrode Annalen der Physik 38, 434 (1912). Rev. Mod. Phys., 90, 015006 (2018). [50] N. Shiraishi, Naoto and T. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. E, 91, [18] H.J. Herrmann and S. Luding, Continuum Mech. Ther- 012130 (2015). modynamics, 10, 189 (1998). [51] N. Rupprecht and D. Can Vural, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, [19] A. Mehta, G. C. Barker and J. M. Luck, Proc. Natl. 080603 (2019). Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 8244 (2008). [52] N. Rupprecht and D. Can Vural, Phys. Rev. E, 102, [20] L. Atia, D. Bi, Y. Sharma, J. A. Mitchel, B. Gweon, 14

062145 (2020). 164503 (2005). [53] J.V. Koski, V.F. Maisi, T. Sagava and J.P. Pekola, Phys. [66] W. D. Ristenpart, P. M. McCalla, R. V. Roy and H. A. Rev. Lett. 113 030601 (2014). Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 064501 (2006). [54] Hugo Touchette and S. Lloyd Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 1156 [67] M. Wu, Phys. Fluids., 16, L51 (2004). (2000). [68] M. Orme, Progress in Energy and Combustion Sci., 23 [55] T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 090602. 65 (1997). (2010). [69] S. C. Case and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, [56] L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931). 084503 (2008). [57] J. Xu, S. Kjelstrup, D. Bedeaux, A. Røsjorde, L. Rekvig [70] J.D. Paulsen, J.C. Burton and S.R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 299, 452 (2006). Lett., 106, 114501 (2011). [58] I. Battiato, D.M. Tartakovsky, Journal of Contaminant [71] J.D. Paulsen, J.C. Burton, S.R. Nagel, S. Appathurai, Hydrology, 120–121, 18 (2011). M.T. Harris and O.A. Basaran, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. [59] I. Battiato, D.M. Tartakovsky, A.M. Tartakovsky, T. U.S.A., 109, 6859 (2012). Scheibe, Advances in Water Resources, 32, 1664 (2009). [72] S. Perumanath, M. K. Borg, M. V. Chubynsky, J. E. [60] J. H. Cushman and D. O’Malley, Journal of Hydrology, Sprittles and J. M. Reese, Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 104501 531, 161 (2015). (2019). [61] J.H. Cushman and T.R. Ginn, Transp Porous Med 13, [73] J. E. McClure, Z. Li, M. Berrill and T. Ramstad, 123 (1993). arXiv:2007.12266, (2020). [62] E. Noether, Gott. Nachr., 235, 405 (1918). [74] M. B. Weissman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 537 (1988). [63] E. Noether, Transport Theory Stat. Phys. 1, 186 (1971). [75] W.S. Kendal, Physica A 421, 141 (2015). [64] J.D. Paulsen, R. Carmigniani, A. Kannan, J. C. Burton [76] P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Let. 59, and S. R. Nagel, Nat. Commun., 5, 3182 (2014). 381 (1987). [65] G. A. L. Dirk, H.N. Aarts, H.N. W. Lekkerkerker, H. [77] F. Alpak, I Zacharoudiou, S Berg, J Dietderich, N Sax- Guo, G.H. Wegdam and D. Bonn, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, ena, Computational Geosciences, 23, 849–880 (2019)