DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective ATLANTIC SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE CONFERENCE OF PERIPHERAL MARITIME REGIONS OF EUROPE Forward Studies Unit for the Maritime Peripheries CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION UNDER THE INTERREG IIIB ATLANTIC AREA PROGRAMME Union Européenne Fonde Européen de Développement Régional PARTICIPATING REGIONS ALENTEJO ANDALUCÍA AQUITAINE ARGYLL AND BUTE ASTURIAS BASSE-NORMANDIE BRETAGNE CASTILLA Y LEÓN CENTRE CENTRO CORNWALL GALICIA GOBIERNO DE NAVARRA LIMOUSIN LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO MID-WEST NORTE PAYS DE LA LOIRE POITOU-CHARENTES WALES COORDINATION RUI AZEVEDO (General Coordination) – CPMR/FSU JEAN-PAUL CARRIERE (Scientific Coordination and French Team) – EPU – DA (University of Tours – CESA) PATRICK ANVROIN (Administrative Coordination) – CPMR JULIE GOURDEN (Administrative Coordination) – CPMR TEAM OF EXPERTS ADRIAN CADENAS – CECODET – ES ANNE BROSSARD - IAAT (MAPPING) ARTUR COSTA (Coordinator of the Portuguese team) QUATERNAIRE PORTUGAL - PT AUDE PEYRALBES – CPMR TRAINEE CAROLINE BROWN- NAPIER UNIVERSITY, EDINBURGH – UK & IRL DOMINIQUE LOUIS - IAAT (MAPPING) ELISABETH RAKOTOFIRINGA - UMR CNRS CITERES and EPU- DA (University of Tours- CESA) – FR EMILIE BOCK – UMR CNRS CITERES and EPU- DA (University of Tours-CESA) – FR FERMIN RODRIGUEZ (Coordinator of the Spanish team) - CECODET - ES FREDERICO FERREIRA – CPMR / FSU INÊS LOPES - QUATERNAIRE PORTUGAL - PT JACOBO BLANCO FERNÁNDEZ - CECODET - ES JAN MAJOR - UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND, BRISTOL– UK & IRL JULIE KING - UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND, BRISTOL– UK & IRL LUIS CARVALHO – QUATERNAIRE PORTUGAL - PT MICHAEL HORSWELL - UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND, BRISTOL– UK & IRL RAFAEL MENENDEZ - CECODET - ES STUART FARTHING (Coordinator of the British and Irish team)- UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND – UK & IRL SECRETARIAT CARLA GUIMARÃES (Secretariat and collect of information) – CPMR/FSU SYLVIA LANGLAIS – CPMR JUNE 2005 CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. 1 SYNTHESIS English............................................................................................................................................. 2 Français ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Português....................................................................................................................................... 12 Español.......................................................................................................................................... 17 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 23 2. Territorial and urban Atlantic systems................................................................................. 25 3. Strategic evaluation of the territorial and urban Atlantic systems .................................... 42 3.1 General characteristics of the Atlantic Area ....................................................................... 42 3.2 Human ressources and their dynamics ................................................................................ 47 3.3 The productive structures of the Atlantic regions ............................................................... 53 3.4 The economic dynamism of the regions seen from the point of view of their levels of production, productivity, and employment. .............................................................................. 73 3.5 Transport networks and the accessibility of territories: a lack of intra Atlantic connections ................................................................................................................................................... 81 3.6. The environment and the maritime dimension................................................................... 90 3.7. Evaluation of territorial disparities and potential in the regional environment of metropolitan and intermediate urban systems using a general index: the Relative Development Index (RDI) ............................................................................................................................. 106 3.8. Summary of the results of the strategic evaluation of the Atlantic Area ........................ 111 3.8.1 Motor sub-areas.......................................................................................................... 115 3.8.2 Integration sub-areas .................................................................................................. 117 4. Atlantic inter-regional co-operation.................................................................................... 119 5. Strategic guidelines for the development of the Atlantic Area ......................................... 124 5.1. Reinforcing Atlantic inter-regional co-operation............................................................. 124 5.1.1 Maritime dimension ................................................................................................... 125 5.1.2 Promote the sustainable development of rural Atlantic Areas................................... 129 5.1.3 Strengthen the exchange of experience and co-operation networks .......................... 131 5.2. Future projects and development areas inside the Atlantic Area ..................................... 135 5.2.1 The British Atlantic Area ........................................................................................... 138 5.2.2 The French North-West Area..................................................................................... 138 5.2.3 The French-Spanish Area........................................................................................... 138 5.2.4 The Western Iberian Area .......................................................................................... 139 5.2.5 The Southern Iberian Area ......................................................................................... 139 5.3 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 140 Glossary.................................................................................................................................... 147 MAP INDEX Map 1 : Location of the different territorial and urban systems in the Atlantic Area Map 2 : Typology of systems Map 3 : Population density Map 4 : Average annual population growth between 1991 and 2002 Map 5 : Activity rate of the population in 2003 Map 6 : Unemployment rate (NUTS 3) Map 7 : Spread of employment Map 8 : Employment concentration Map 9 : Location of dominant sectoral specialisations Map 10 : Highest sectoral specialisation coefficient (NUTS 3) Map 11 : GDP per capita in 2002 Map 12 : Variation of the GDP per capita (in PPP) between 1991 and 2002 Map 13 : Employment growth in Atlantic Area regions Map 14 : Number of towns and (pop. > 50,000) located less than 50 Km away by road Map 15 : Road connectivity of urban ares (niveau 1 et 2) Map 16 : Rail connectivity within the Atlantic Area Map 17 : Short sea shipping route serving Atlantic ports (April 2005) Map 18 : Number of scheduled flights between the Atlantic Area airports Map 19 : Protected areas: situations in the Atlantic Area Map 20 : Relative economic Development Index of Atlantic NUTS 3 area Map 21 : Spatial organisation of the Atlantic Area Map 22 : Spatial vision of the Atlantic Area FOREWORD In the light of cooperation experiences under the Interreg II C programme and in the run-up to the Interreg III B “Atlantic Area” programme, the Atlantic Arc Commission decided to take a closer look at the Atlantic Area’s place and role in the way the European territory is organised. With the firm belief that that the development of the Atlantic regions needs to be considered within a European perspective, the Atlantic Arc Commission decided to put spatial planning in the Atlantic Area at the top of its agenda. This gave rise to the idea to develop an Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective (ASDP) with the participation of three quarters of the Atlantic Arc Commission’s members, under the coordination of the CPMR as project leader. Eighteen months on, we are pleased to present the findings of the work led by the 20 partner regions in the project. The study was written by a team of experts from the UK, France, Spain and Portugal, who regularly discussed their findings and recommendations with the regions. The work that is presented here is quite remarkable in that it presents a highly detailed diagnosis of the relative strengths and weaknesses among our Atlantic regions and with regard to the rest of Europe. This makes it a rather unique work providing a valuable aid for our regions in their territorial development strategies. Drawing on the guidelines identified by the experts and described in the second volume of the report, the regions now need to adopt these proposals as their own as part of their spatial planning policies, since the actual implementation of these guidelines depends on political will and decision-making capabilities. It is important to step up or indeed develop certain partnerships between local authorities (regions, counties, cities) as part of an integration process extending in some cases beyond national borders. This gives the regions a reference that allows them to look at and consider their social, economic, cultural and territorial development in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex 10: (Draft) Final Reports Template
    T4 – Territorial Trends in Technological Transformations Applied Research Final Report – Case Study Annex A Final Report – Case Study Annex A This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors responsible for Technopolis Group (TG) – Reda Nausedaite and Section 1 Olga Mikheeva Technopolis Group (TG) – Karine Lanoix and Section 2 Patrick Eparvier University of Warsaw & EUROREG (UW – Section 3 EUROREG) - Agnieszka Olechnicka and Maciej Smętkowski Economics University in Bratislava (EUBA) - Section 4 Miroslav Šipikal, Štefan Rehák, and Martina Džubáková MCRIT – Laura Noguera, Oriol Biosca, Rafa Section 5 Rodrigo and Andreu Ulied Advisory Group Project Support Team: Marinko Ajduk, Wolfgang Pichler, Christine Wallez Cuevas ESPON EGTC: Martin Gauk, György Alfold Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. © ESPON,2020 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] ISBN: 978-2-919795-59-8 ESPON / T4 – Territorial trends in technological transformation / Final Report – Case Study Annex A Final Report – Case Study Annex A T4 – Territorial Trends in Technological Transformations Version 06/07/2020 Disclaimer: This document is a draft final report.
    [Show full text]
  • THETIS MRE Report : 4Th International Convention on Marine Renewable Energy Nantes, 20Th & 21St May 2015
    THETIS MRE Report : 4th International Convention on Marine Renewable Energy Nantes, 20th & 21st May 2015 Under the patronage of Thétis EMR SAS ● 118 rue de Vaugirard ● 75006 Paris ● +33 1 49 54 73 45 Thetis MRE, Nantes, 20th & 21st May 2015 About THETIS MRE The International Convention THETIS MRE was created in 2011 to respond to growing needs and expectations of the players in the emerging marine renewable energies sector, to gather them together so they can share their experiences, and to promote the development of these « green energies » as a source of « blue growth ». THETIS MRE’s mission: • Be at the service of the industry through the adapted event management • Unite and gather regions and institutions • Gather together decision-makers and stakeholders around an international meeting dedicated to renewable ocean energy • Promote the role of marine renewable energies in the energy transition Thetis MRE, Nantes, 20th & 21st May 2015 About THETIS MRE THETIS MRE, a unique business meeting: • Under the Patronage of the French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development, Thetis MRE has accompanied the rise of the sector by gathering around its unifying event all key players in the MRE market : political and institutional, business and associations, economic agencies, industrial and competitiveness clusters, university research centres, media etc. • Hosted each year by a region particularily driven by the development of MREs, Thetis MRE’s ambition is to continue the itinerant 2-day annual meeting by adapting its format to the evolution in the market and by anticipating trends and future stages, according to a forward-looking approach. The previous editions of Thetis MRE International Convention took place in Bordeaux, 2012 (Acquitaine region), Brest, 2013 (Brittany), Cherbourg, 2014 (Normandy)and Nantes , 2015 (Pays de la Loire).
    [Show full text]
  • City Report: Nantes
    CITY REPORT: NANTES Laurent Fraisse and Marie-Luce Bia Zafinikamia CRIDA (France) WILCO Publication no. 25 This report is part of Work Package 3 of the research project entitled "Welfare innovations at the local level in favour of cohesion" (WILCO). WILCO aims to examine, through cross-national comparative research, how local welfare systems affect social inequalities and how they favour social cohesion, with a special focus on the missing link between innovations at the local level and their successful transfer to and implementation in other settings. The WILCO consortium covers ten European countries and is funded by the European Commission (FP7, Socio-economic Sciences & Humanities) . TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..............................................................................................3 1. Transformation in the labour market ...........................................................3 1.1. Public regulations ...............................................................................9 1.2. Indicators ....................................................................................... 12 2. Demographic changes and family .............................................................. 13 2.1. Public regulations ............................................................................. 17 2.2. Indicators ....................................................................................... 20 3. Immigration ....................................................................................... 21 3.1. Public
    [Show full text]
  • Nantes Report on Innovations
    WORK PACKAGE 5 SOCIAL INNOVATIONS IN NANTES, FRANCE Anouk Coqblin , Laurent Fraisse CRIDA (France) CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND OF THE SOCIAL INNOVATIONS 1 2. EXAMPLES OF SOCIAL INNOVATIONS 3 2.1. Time for Roof: description of a housing innovation 3 2.1.1. Conception and ways of addressing users 4 2.1.2. Internal organisation and modes of working 5 2.1.3. Interaction with the local welfare system 5 2.2. Joint assessment of families' needs and changes in childcare provision for single-parent families 6 2.2.1. Short description of the innovation 6 2.2.2. Conception and ways of addressing users 7 2.2.3. Internal organisation and modes of working 7 2.2.4. Interaction with the local welfare system 8 2.3. The Lieux Collectifs de Proximité network: description of a childcare and women’s innovation 9 2.3.1. Conception and ways of addressing users 10 2.3.2. Internal organisation and modes of working 11 2.3.3. Interaction with the local welfare system 12 CONCLUSION 13 REFERENCES AND INTERVIEWS 18 1. BACKGROUND OF THE SOCIAL INNOVATIONS Emergence of local proactive welfare policies: As far as housing and childcare policies are concerned, multi-level governance is the predominant situation with more or less shared responsibilities between national and local governments. It introduces complex institutional relations and potential tensions on issues such as priorities on the agenda and funding. Indeed, childcare and housing issues are partly determined by national policies. Nevertheless, cities and metropolises have taken more responsibilities throughout the years for different reasons: continuation of the decentralisation process; context of the economic crisis implying state withdrawal from welfare policies; development of technical resources and expertise at the level of cities and metropolises, enabling them to develop their own policies.
    [Show full text]
  • City Nantes Metropolis
    City Nantes Metropolis Country France Population 630,000 inhabitants Title of policy or practice Appel à projet "installations agricoles" (Call for "Agricultural Installations" Project) Subtitle (optional) How to attract promoters of sustainable agricultural projects in a dense urban context? URL video Category Food Production SDGs SDGs: 8, 11, 12, 15, 17. Brief description Background: Nantes urban area includes 24 municipalities with 630,000 inhabitants (6th in France). It is remarkably dynamic, while preserving two thirds of its surface area for agricultural and natural activities (30,000 hectares i.e. 300 km²). Although there is strong land pressure, diversified agriculture has resisted quite well since the city launched an ambitious programme to protect and re-cultivate fallow land. During the period 2009- 2017, nearly 180 hectares were cleared, and 30 farms were set up with the financial support of Nantes Metropolis (NM). Today, new areas are ready to embrace new agricultural projects that are consistent with the community's objectives in terms of business activity, environmental and biodiversity preservation, and the social dynamics of our peri-urban and urban areas. A working group has been set up to facilitate the installation of new farms. It aims to characterize the potential of each area, identify project leaders likely to be interested and look for the best possible match between the areas and the candidates for installation by an innovative and participatory method. Objectives of the approach: • Find the right match between
    [Show full text]
  • NANTES M2PS/URP : International Research Master
    NANTES M2PS/URP : International Research Master Field Trip report 13th & 14th January, 2015 Nantes 2015 Acknowledgement The class of 2014-2015 would like to profusely thank Prof. Hamdouch, for the insightful trip and for organizing all the meetings with the most prominent people of relevant fields in Nantes. We express our heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Fache, who took time out of his busy schedule and was the perfect guide; one that no other visitor to Nantes could possibly have. In addition, a thank you to Héléne Morteau from SAMAO, Prof. Devisme and the employees of SEMITAN, for sharing their illuminating views on various projects in Nantes. We would like to thank Prof. Thibault for sharing his love for Nantes and his profound knowledge of the city with us. Last but not the least, we thank Ksenija Banovac for accompanying us and being the best kind of conversationalist in the class. 1 | Nantes 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Tuesday ( 13/01/2015 ) Intersection point of Le Loire and L'Erdre ........................................................................ 4 Social Housing ................................................................................................................ 7 School of Architecture ..................................................................................................... 8 Euro Nantes .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAINT HERBLAIN Quartier De Preux Adaptation Métropolitaine Metropolitan Adaptation 2
    SAINT HERBLAIN Quartier de PreuX Adaptation métropolitaine metropolitan adaptation 2 Rouen CA Roissy Porte de France Fosses Paris paris-Saclay Saint-Herblain Vichy val d’allier Marseille Europan 12 France, Saint-Herblain 3 AVANT PROPOS FOReWORD «La ville adaptable, Insérer les rythmes urbains» a trouvé « Adaptable city, inserting urban rhythms » is having une résonance certaine a travers les sites mis au concours particular resonance with sites proposed for Europan 12 pour cette 12°session d’Europan, selon des thématiques competition, around a large scope of topics. Shared by 17 inventoriées, croisées, déclinées, significatives de notre European countries, these issues are revealing the most époque et de nos sociétés urbaines dans 17 pays d’Europe. significant challenges of our time and our urban societies. Des villes et des collectivités sont en attente d’idées, de Municipalities and communities are requiring relevant ideas concepts, de propositions éminemment innovantes, and concepts, innovative and forward-looking proposals, pertinentes, prospectives, qui se feront l’écho des in order to reflect and pursue a broad set of questions on interrogations multiples sur la question de la mutation, territories undergoing changes and mutations. l’évolution, la transformation de leurs territoires. This document consists of specifications that have been Ce dossier constitue un cahier des charges, élaboré au drafted over the last six months by representatives of each cours des six derniers mois par chaque ville participante participating city, in collaboration with their partners, et ses partenaires, un expert de site -architecte urbaniste, Europan France Secretariat and an associate expert et le secrétariat d’Europan France. Il prend en compte la (architect and urban planner).
    [Show full text]
  • Les Territoires De La Métropole Nantaise
    Norois Environnement, aménagement, société 192 | 2004/3 La Loire. Sociétés, risques, paysages, environnement Les territoires de la métropole nantaise : de la ville à l’agglomération, de l’agglomération à la métropole Territories of the Nantes metropolis: from city to agglomeration and to metropolis Jean Renard Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/norois/958 DOI : 10.4000/norois.958 ISBN : 978-2-7535-1540-6 ISSN : 1760-8546 Éditeur Presses universitaires de Rennes Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 septembre 2004 Pagination : 135-142 ISBN : 978-2-7535-0054-9 ISSN : 0029-182X Référence électronique Jean Renard, « Les territoires de la métropole nantaise : de la ville à l’agglomération, de l’agglomération à la métropole », Norois [En ligne], 192 | 2004/3, mis en ligne le 26 août 2008, consulté le 02 mai 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/norois/958 ; DOI : 10.4000/norois.958 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 2 mai 2019. © Tous droits réservés Les territoires de la métropole nantaise : de la ville à l’agglomération, de ... 1 Les territoires de la métropole nantaise : de la ville à l’agglomération, de l’agglomération à la métropole Territories of the Nantes metropolis: from city to agglomeration and to metropolis Jean Renard Une région est sur la terre un espace précis mais non immuable, inscrit dans un cadre naturel donné, et répondant à trois caractéristiques essentielles : les liens existant entre ses habitants, son organisation autour d’un centre doté d’une certaine autonomie, et son intégration
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Land and Housing Policy Instruments for the Provision of Affordable Housing in a European Metropolis
    Assessment of land and housing policy instruments for the provision of affordable housing in a European metropolis Case study: Nantes (France) Master Thesis Report Elsa Gallez July 2020 Supervisor: Dr. Thomas Hartmann (WUR) Co-supervisors: Dr. Isabelle Anguelovski (UAB), Dr. Francesc Baró (UAB) Second reviewer: Barbara Tempels (PhD) Registration number : 961220249080 Master in Urban Environmental Management Land Use Planning Group Master thesis - Report - Elsa Gallez - LUP - WUR - July 2020 Aknowledgment I would like to express my great appreciation to Dr. Thomas Hartmann for his supervision and valuable suggestions throughout the thesis process. I am also very thankful to Dr. Isabelle Anguelovski and Dr. Francesc Baró, without whom this thesis would not have been carried out. I am grateful for their constant support, their availability and their willingness to share their data. I would like to thank the academic staff members of the LUP department of WUR and all the researchers of the BCNUEJ, who provided me appropriate knowledge on land use planning and enhanced my critical thinking. I would like to thank my parents and siblings, who, besides their constant encouragements, were always available for debates. I could not thank enough my beloved partner, Rafael Montero, for his wonderful presence, support and understanding, during times of high and low tides. I am also particularly grateful to Marianne Wehbe for her availability and contacts in Nantes and to my friends, who in one way or another, participated to the accomplishment of this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank all the interviewees of Nantes who accepted to share their point of view on this complex and controversial issue.
    [Show full text]
  • French Pavilion Curator: Dominique Perrault 12Th International Architecture Exhibition - Venice Biennale August 29 - November 21, 2010
    French Pavilion Curator: Dominique Perrault 12th International Architecture Exhibition - Venice Biennale August 29 - November 21, 2010 www.french-pavilion-venice.com Press kit Contents 4 Editorial METROPOLIS ? Paris «Grand Paris» / Bordeaux / Lyon / Marseille / Nantes Saint-Nazaire 8 Background The French Pavilion at the Venice Biennale 12 Introduction METROPOLIS ? 13 Presentation METROPOLIS ? Paris «Grand Paris» / Bordeaux / Lyon / Marseille / Nantes Saint-Nazaire Concept Exhibition Design Biography of Dominique Perrault 20 Presentation METROPOLIS ? the film Seeing the void ? Biography of Richard Copans 22 The Metropolises 24 Paris «Grand Paris» 28 Bordeaux 32 Lyon 36 Marseille 40 Nantes Saint-Nazaire 44 The French Pavilion extended in L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui Introduction to ‘A’A’ Issue 379 ‘A’A’ METROPOLIS ? Biography of Cyrille Poy 48 Culturesfrance Operator of the French representation 49 Ministry of Culture and Communication 52 French presence in Venice 56 Project’s actors & Partners 67 Practical informations and contacts 4 Editorial Venice still charms, inspires and of the docks of Bordeaux, the beating welcomes to its heart every fantasy heart of Marseille, the major works METROPOLIS ? and every challenge. The French at the confluence of the rivers in Lyon, Paris «Grand Paris» Pavilion wanted to be part of this and the eco-metropolitan development tradition as it participates in the 12th of Nantes Saint-Nazaire are all changes Bordeaux International Architecture Biennale that invite us to take another look in Venice. at urban space, its occupancy and Lyon the possibilities it holds in its “folds.” Marseille This year the Pavilion’s Commissioner, At different scales, each of these Dominique Perrault, whose talent metropolises projects itself into the Nantes Saint-Nazaire crosses borders, is engaged future and into space and creates in a passionate consideration the conditions for a new urbanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    Contents Nantes, European Green Capital 2013 1 Nantes The Nantes Saint-Nazaire Eco-Metropolis: building the city around the river 3 I. Nantes Saint-Nazaire: An Eco-Metropolis in motion 7 Saint-Nazaire 1.1. A meaningful space 7 1.1.1. Water, water everywhere 7 building the city around the river 1.1.2. A vision in green 7 1.1.3. Bipolar metropolis 7 1.2. Strong development 8 1.2.1. Steady demographic growth 8 1.2.2. Economic performance that benefits everyone 8 1.3. A shared project for an Eco-Metropolis 9 1.3.1. A governed territory 9 1.3.2. The Eco-Metropolis Project 10 II. The River: the focus of Nantes Saint-Nazaire Eco-Metropolis projects 19 2.1. Building the city around the water: the urban projects around the river 20 2.2. Protect, preserve and promote the estuary: the environmental projects 32 2.3. Renew the economic dynamics of the river: economic projects 37 2.4. Transit options: transportation projects 38 2.5. Explore and showcase the estuary: cultural, tourist and recreational projects 41 Governance in the greater territory 45 Cartographic references 46 Contact Pôle métropolitain Nantes Saint-Nazaire 2 Cours du Champ de Mars – 44923 Nantes Cedex 9 www.nantessaintnazaire.fr – Tél. 00 33 2 51 16 47 09 Nantes Saint-Nazaire Metropolis Contents Nantes, Nantes, European Green Capital 2013 1 European Green Capital 2013 The Nantes Saint-Nazaire Eco-Metropolis: building the city around the river 3 In January 2013, Nantes will become European tives launched the “My City Tomorrow” initiative, Green Capital , following in the footsteps of which will mobilise all stakeholders in the region Stockholm, Hamburg and Vitoria-Gasteiz.
    [Show full text]
  • Île De Nantes Urban Project by SAMOA 2
    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement n° 831704 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 1. BROWNFIELD SITES: DRIVERS OF EXPERIMENTATION ON THE ÎLE DE NANTES ...................................................................................................................... 3 2. THE EMERGENCE OF SAMOA AND THE INVENTION OF A METHOD ......... 5 3. TOOLS AND GOVERNANCE TO SUPPORT THE URBAN PROJECT ............ 9 3.1. The guide plan: early experiments ............................................................. 9 3.2. SAMOA, an evolving legal structure ......................................................... 11 4. THE “CREATIVE ARTS DISTRICT” CLUSTER, THE EMBODIMENT OF THE “CREATIVE CITY” .................................................................................................... 12 5. A SHIFT TOWARDS PARTICIPATORY URBAN PLANNING? ....................... 14 5.1. Change of course ..................................................................................... 14 5.2. Green capital and its offshoot, Green Island ............................................ 15 5.3. Île de Nantes Expérimentations – Ilotopia ................................................ 17 6. WHAT SHOULD WE RETAIN AND WHAT IS TRANSFERABLE FROM THE NANTES EXAMPLE? ................................................................................................ 20 KEY REFERENCES
    [Show full text]