DOCSLIB.ORG

2 NNN Assets with 50,000 SF of Land GARNET AVENUE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 NNN Assets with 50,000 SF of Land GARNET AVENUE 4711 MISSION BAY DRIVE 2804 GARNET AVENUE 2 NNN assets with 50,000 SF of land Kipp Gstettenbauer, CCIM Brandon Keith Ryan King Senior Vice President | Lic. #01405420 Senior Vice President | Lic #011177792 Vice President | Lic. #01885401 858.458.3345 | [email protected] 858.458.3326 | [email protected] 858.458.3322 | [email protected] GARNET AVENUE BALBOA AVENUE MISSION BAY DRIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Investment Summary 4 Lease Abstract 4 Parcel Map & Zoning 7 Competitive Sets 10 Tenant Profile Overview 14 McDonalds 16 GARNET AVENUE 76® (Phillips 66) 20 Market Overviews MISSION BAY DRIVE Amernities Aerial 26 San Diego Trolley Expansion 28 Pacific Beach Overview 32 Mission Bay Overview 33 San Diego Overview 34 Demographics 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TREMENDOUS UPSIDE SUPERB INGRESS / EGRESS The close proximity to Mission Bay Park, Mission Bay Golf Course & Located on the AM side of Garnet Avenue and Mission Bay Practice Center and to the future Balboa Avenue Trolley Stop and Drive, this asset is accessed by four (4) different curb cuts amenities provide to complement the coastal lifestyle, and include a at a signalized intersection. public plaza for the community to gather and enjoy. UNPARALLELED LOCATION Situated at the gateway to San Diego’s Mission Bay Park in the Pacific Beach community with direct access to Interstate 5 and in close proximity to Interstate 8 and Highway 52. LOCATION. LOCATION. LOCATION. Arguably one of, if not, the busiest intersections in the City of San Diego. INVESTMENT SUMMARY McDONALD’S CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation 4711 Mission Bay Drive, San Diego, CA 92109 We are pleased to offer qualified investors a rare opportunity to acquire a COMMENCEMENT DATE June 1, 2000 fee simple (land and building) property BUILDING SF 3,234 SF leased to McDonald’s [NASDAQ:MCD], LOT SF 36,154 SF & 76 (Phillips 66) [NASDAQ:PSX]. The BASE RENT $11,865.24 /mo. NNN 12.5% property is located in an exceptional BASE RENT INCREASES One (1) Year and Two (2) months area of San Diego, California in arguably LEASE TERM REMAINING OPERATING EXPENSES Tenant is full triple net and covers all taxes, maintenance, one of, if not, the busiest intersection in and insurance. the City of San Diego. OPTION TO EXTEND Four (5) five year options with 12.5% increases. This asset is superbly located just 2 » Option 1: $13,348.40 September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2025 » Option 2: $15,016.95 September 1, 2025 - August 31, 2030 miles west from the Pacific Ocean in the » Option 3: $16,894.07 September 1, 2030 - August 31, 2035 » Option 4: $19,005.83 September 1, 2035 - August 31, 2040 affluent community of Pacific Beach, just South of San Diego’s pristine La Jolla Cove and just north of San 76® (Phillips 66) Diego’s coveted Mission Bay. The site is 2804 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, CA 92109 situated off Garnet Avenue and Mission COMMENCEMENT DATE April 1, 1990 Bay Drive and surrounded by residents BUILDING SF 2,329 SF from Pacific Beach, Clairemont, Bay LOT SF 14,600 SF Park, and Mission Bay. The 5-mile BASE RENT $16,729.63 /mo. NNN radius of households is close to 146,110. BASE RENT INCREASES 15% Owned under the same private family LEASE TERM REMAINING One (1) Year and One (1) month trust since the early 1900’s, the Harris OPERATING EXPENSES Tenant is full triple net and covers all taxes, maintenance, and insurance. Family Trust has decided to sell and OPTION TO EXTEND Two (2) five year options with 15% increases. all go their own seperate ways. No 1031 » Option 1: $16,729.63 August 1, 2015 - July 31, 2020 Exchange will be entered into. » Option 2: $19,239.07 August 1, 2020 - July 31, 2025 163,000 ADT Balboa Avenue Trolley Station INTERSTATE 5 BALBOA AVENUE 147,000 ADT MISSION BAY DRIVE LIST PRICE $9,150,000 37,440 ADT CAP RATE 4.27% 2020 NET 62,418 ADT OPERATING INCOME $391,049.64 Both tenants are corporate signature, full triple net covering all property GARNET AVE maintenance, property insurance and property taxes. MISSION BAY DRIVE Less than a I-5 minute away Freeway Access VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO BALBOA AVENUE TROLLEY STATION Somwhat 86 Walkable Walking Score Very 86 Bikeable Bike Score PARCEL MAP & SUMMARY 49,901 SQ. FT. TOTAL COMBINED LAND PARCEL NO. (APN) 424-572-02-00 424-572-03-00 TENANT McDonald's Corporation 76® (Phillips 66) PROPERTY ADDRESS 4711 Mission Bay Drive, San Diego, CA 92109 2804 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, CA 92109 BUILDING SF 3,336 SF 2,329 SF LOT SF 36,154 SF (0.83 Acres) 13,747 SF (0.32 Acres) LAND USE General Commercial General Commercial ZONING CODE CC-4-2 or IL-3-1* CC-4-2 ZONING HIGHLIGHTS CC-4-2. Intended to accommodate development with high intensity, strip commercial characteristics and permits a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit for each 1,500 square feet of lot area. Permitted Use. Multifamily, school, retail, drive-thru, parking, office, and (all) auto. MULTI-FAMILY 1 DU / 1,500 SF MAX SETBACKS 10 feet (interior side) / 10 feet (rear) FAR 2.0 MAX HEIGHT 60 feet IL-3-1*. Intended to permit a range of uses, including nonindustrial uses in some instances. Permitted Use. Allows a mix of light industrial, office, and commercial uses. CUP. Marijuana Outlet; not allowed within 1,000 ft of the following: resource and population-based City parks; churches; child care centers; playgrounds; City libraries; minor-oriented facilities; other Marijuana Outlets; residential care facilities; or schools (as defined in SDMC Section 141.0504) FAR 2.0 Max Setbacks Rear Street Side Interior Side Front Minimun 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet 20 feet Garnet Avenue Mission Bay Drive Balboa Avenue SALE COMPARABLES 1 2 3 4 5 ADDRESS: 1850 5TH AVENUE 925 ORANGE AVENUE 26241 AVERY PARKWAY 5716 ATLANTIC BLVD 8200 PARKWAY DRIVE San Diego, CA 92101 Coronado, CA 92118 Mission Viejo, CA 92692 Maywood, CA 90270 La Mesa, CA 91942 BUYER: JJ San Diego, LLC Rosvold Properties, LLC Theresa Matias Asia Sea Investments, Inc. Kumiva Group, LLC SELLER: HP Investors MetLife, Inc. Pacific Castle, Inc. Elliot Megdal & Associates Midtown National Group TENANT: CVS Walgreens Del Taco Starbucks Chick-fil-A SALE DATE: January 2018 November 2013 May 2018 November 2017 March 2018 SALE PRICE: $9,425,000 $7,740,000 $4,100,000 $3,868,000 $3,670,000 AVG. PRICE PSF: $939.87 /SF $815.60 /SF $1,863.64 /SF $2,148.89 /SF $810.87 /SF CAP RATE: 3.70% 3.90% 3.72% 3.99% 3.79% BUILDING SIZE: 10,028 SF 9,490 SF 2,200 SF 1,800 SF 4,526 SF LAND AREA: 24,829 SF [0.57 AC] 27,878 SF [0.64 AC] 153,000 SF [3.51 AC] 16,361 SF [0.38 AC] 41,382 SF [0.95 AC] LAND PRICE PSF: $379.60 /SF $277.64 /SF $26.80 /SF $236.42 /SF $82.69 /SF YEAR BUILT / RENOV.: 1965 1975 1991 2017 2017 PARKING RATIO: 3.3/1,000 SF 4.0/1,000 SF 6.4/1,000 SF Undisclosed Undisclosed 6 7 8 9 10 ADDRESS: 569 H STREET 1359 GARNET AVENUE 420 NORTH COAST HIGHWAY 1702 MISSION AVENUE 2780 GARNET AVENUE Chula Vista, CA 91910 San Diego, CA 92109 Oceanside, CA 92054 Oceanside, CA 92058 San Diego, CA 92109 BUYER: Vachaspathi Palakodeti KLNB Harry Guzelimian Scott G Stone Baba Partners, LLC SELLER: Matt Moser Edward E Colson III Trust Andy Hirmez Blake Megdal Ent SD, LLC TENANT: Chipotle Starbucks Circle K Starbucks Enterprise Rent-A-Car SALE DATE: January 2015 October 2018 March 2019 July 2016 March 2019 SALE PRICE: $3,125,000 $3,100,000 $2,645,000 $2,600,000 $2,300,000 AVG. PRICE PSF: $813.80 /SF $2,019.54 /SF $1,255.94 /SF $3,058.82 /SF $1,533.33 /SF CAP RATE: 4.00% 3.90% 4.00% 3.90% 3.57% BUILDING SIZE: 3,840 SF 1,535 SF 2,106 SF 850 SF 1,500 SF LAND AREA: 12,632 SF [0.29 AC] 9,374 SF [0.22 AC] 10,018 SF [0.23 AC] 17,049 SF [0.39 AC] 16,117 SF [0.37 AC] LAND PRICE PSF: $247.39 /SF $330.70 /SF $264.02 /SF $152.50 /SF $142.71 /SF YEAR BUILT / RENOV.: 2014 1979 1973 2016 2012 PARKING RATIO: 8.9/1,000 SF 7.8/1,000 SF 5.5/1,000 SF Undisclosed Undisclosed TENANT PROFILE MCDONALD’S CORPORATION [A-Credit Rating] 4711 Mission Bay Drive, San Diego, CA 92109 The subject site is a rare opportunity to acquire a 3,234 SF free standing building located in the heart of Pacific Beach situated on 36,154 SF of land. This freestanding drive-thru is one of the most rare drive-thru’s in all of the Pacific Beach area and situated on the entrance and exit of Interstate 5. Any person entering in to Pacific Beach, must pass by this location. The initial lease term is for twenty (20) years, and another twenty years of options consisting of four (4) five (5) year options to extend at 12.5% annual increases. There is no better real estate in the entire Pacific Beach area for a Drive-Thru McDonalds. There is also no other real estate that can be put together in a better area to create a drive thru which makes McDonalds unable to relocate to another location if they ever wanted too.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phillips Petroleum Company 2001 Annual Report
    Phillips Petroleum Company 2001 Annual Report NEW EXPECTATIONS PHILLIPS’ MISSION IS TO PROVIDE SUPERIOR RETURNS FOR SHAREHOLDERS THROUGH TOP PERFORMANCE IN ALL OUR BUSINESSES. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CONTENTS COMPANY IN BRIEF 2 PHILLIPS’WORLDWIDE OPERATIONS Phillips Petroleum Company is a 4 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS major integrated U.S. oil and gas CEO Jim Mulva describes Phillips’ journey and explains why the company has company. It is headquartered in new expectations for increased shareholder returns. Bartlesville, Oklahoma. The company 7 THE CHAIRMAN’S PERSPECTIVE was founded in 1917. Phillips’ core Jim Mulva responds to questions about the company as it prepares to enter a new era. activities are: 9 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ■ Petroleum exploration and produc- Phillips remains financially strong despite a challenging economic climate. tion on a worldwide scale. 10 EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P) ■ Petroleum refining, marketing and Phillips anticipates increased oil and gas output from existing projects, and is transportation, primarily in the carrying out a balanced and focused exploration program. United States. 18 REFINING, MARKETING AND TRANSPORTATION (RM&T) ■ Chemicals and plastics production Following its acquisition of Tosco, Phillips is capturing synergies and taking advantage and distribution worldwide through of its expanded capabilities as one of the largest U.S. refiners and marketers. a 50 percent interest in Chevron 24 CHEMICALS Phillips Chemical Company Chevron Phillips Chemical Company is weathering a difficult market, holding down (CPChem). costs and carrying out growth projects. ■ Natural gas gathering, processing 26 GAS GATHERING, PROCESSING AND MARKETING and marketing in North America Phillips’ midstream joint venture is making the most of its strengths while through a 30.3 percent interest in pursuing growth opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxon Bayway Refinery Co, Linden, New Jersey
    ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery CA750 Page 1 of 40 DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA750) Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control Facility Name: ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery Facility Address: 1400 Park Avenue, Linden, New Jersey Facility EPA ID #: NJD062037031 BACKGROUND Definition of Environmental Indicators (for the RCRA Corrective Action) Environmental Indicators (EI) are measures being used by the RCRA Corrective Action program to go beyond programmatic activity measures (e.g., reports received and approved, etc.) to track changes in the quality of the environment. The two EI developed to-date indicate the quality of the environment in relation to current human exposures to contamination and the migration of contaminated groundwater. An EI for non-human (ecological) receptors is intended to be developed in the future. Definition of “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI A positive “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI determination (“YE” status code) indicates that the migration of “contaminated” groundwater has stabilized, and that monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater remains within the original “area of contaminated groundwater” (for all groundwater “contamination” subject to RCRA corrective action at or from the identified facility (i.e., site-wide)). Relationship of EI to Final Remedies While Final remedies remain the long-term objective of the RCRA Corrective Action program the EI are near-term objectives which are currently being used as Program measures for the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, GPRA). The “Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control” EI pertains ONLY to the physical migration (i.e., further spread) of contaminated ground water and contaminants within groundwater (e.g., non-aqueous phase liquids or NAPLs).
    [Show full text]
  • California Department of Parks And
    ATTACHMENT B California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Forms State of California – The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial _____________________________________ NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings _______________________________________________________________ Review Code __________ Reviewer ____________________________ Date ___________ Page 1 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Port Costa Wharf and Associated Structures P1. Other Identifier: Port Costa Wharf and Associated Structures *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Contra Costa and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad Benicia Date 1969 (R 1980) T 2N; R 3W; ___ ¼ of Sec N/A; _____ B.M. c. Address _______________________________ City ________________ Zip ________________ d. UTM: (give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone _____; ______________mE/ _____________mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Southeast of the town of Port Costa and northwest of the City of Martinez along western shoreline of the Carquinez Strait *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The remains of the Port Costa Wharf and its associated structures (four dolphins, and two mooring platforms) are located in the project area and were recorded by AECOM’s architectural historian. The Port Costa Wharf is located southwest of the town of Port Costa in Contra Costa County. Located along the western shoreline of the Carquinez Strait are the remains of a wharf, four dolphins, and two mooring platforms. The mooring platforms are located south of the wharf concrete abutments underneath wood beams and metal sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Opinion This Court Has Reviewed, Whether by a District Or Circuit Court, Discussed Fairness in the Context of a Multi-Defendant Lawsuit
    I. Introduction, Statement of Facts, and Procedural History “Nearly any consent decree can be viewed simultaneously as ‘a crackdown or a sellout.’” United States v. Telluride Co., 849 F. Supp. 1400, 1402 (D. Colo. 1994) (quoting William A. Rodger, Jr., 2 Environmental Law: Air and Water, § 4.40 at 584 (1986)). This quote rings especially true for the settlement that this court has been tasked with reviewing. After eleven years of litigation, including a sixty-six day trial before this court, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP,” State,” or “Department”) and ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) have agreed to a consent judgment (“Proposed Consent Judgment” or “Consent Judgment”) that resolves the State’s claims for natural resource damages in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Docket No. UNN-L-3026-04, consolidated with Docket No. UNN-L-1650-05 (“Bayway/Bayonne Litigation”). The Consent Judgment also resolves (1) the State’s pending claims in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Exxon Mobil Corp. f/k/a GATX Terminals Corp., Docket No. L- 1063-07, consolidated with Docket No. L-0563-03; and (2) certain potential claims the DEP may have against Exxon at fifteen other facilities and 1768 retail gas stations. After giving considerable time and thought to its task, for the reasons stated in this opinion, the court finds that the proposed consent judgment is fair, reasonable, in the public interest, and consistent with the goals of the Spill Compensation and Control Act (“Spill Act”), N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.24.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination
    ExxonMobil Bayway Refinery CA725 Page 1 of 21 DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA725) Current Human Exposures Under Control Facility Name: Bayway Refinery Facility Address: 1400 Park Avenue, Linden, New Jersey Facility EPA ID #: NJD062037031 BACKGROUND Definition of Environmental Indicators (for the RCRA Corrective Action) Environmental Indicators (EI) are measures being used by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action program to go beyond programmatic activity measures (e.g., reports received and approved, etc.) to track changes in the quality of the environment. The two EIs developed to-date indicate the quality of the environment in relation to current human exposures to contamination and the migration of contaminated groundwater. Definition of “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI A positive “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI determination (“YE” status code) indicates that there are no “unacceptable” human exposures to “contamination” (i.e., contaminants in concentrations in excess of appropriate risk-based levels) that can be reasonably expected under current land- and groundwater-use conditions (for all “contamination” subject to RCRA corrective action at or from the identified facility (i.e., site-wide)). Relationship of EI to Final Remedies While Final remedies remain the long-term objective of the RCRA Corrective Action program the EI are near-term objectives which are currently being used as Program measures for the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, GPRA). The “Current Human Exposures Under Control” EI are for reasonably expected human exposures under current land- and groundwater-use conditions ONLY, and do not consider potential future land- or groundwater-use conditions or ecological receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Managoment Long Beach, CA 90806 Phone 562.290-1721 [email protected]
    Louis S. iiloeconi Western Region lllanager Romadlatlon Phillip 66 Remediation Managenent 3900 Kilroy Airport Way, Ste. 210 Managoment Long Beach, CA 90806 Phone 562.290-1721 [email protected] January 24,2020 By Email and U.S. Mail Ms. Jing Song Cleanup Project Manager NWRO Toxics Cleanup Program Department of Ecology 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98009-5452 Re: Preliminary Determination of Liability TOSCO 25535330857 600 \ilestlake Avenue Northo Seattle, WA 98109 Cleanup Site ID: 6134 Facility/Site ID: 46445373 Dear Ms. Song: This letter responds, on behalf of Phillips 66 Company ("Phillips 66"), to your letter of December 27,2019, setting forth the Department of Ecology's ("Ecology") Preliminary Determination of Liability of Phillips 66 for the release of hazardous substances at the referenced I facility (the " Site"). Without admitting liability underthe Model Toxics Coutrol Act (MTCA) or any other statute or common law principle, and as set forth in this letter, Phillips 66 has agreed, for purposes of Ecology's proposed Agreed Order, to accept its status as a Potentially Liable Person ('flf.; and to waive its rights to the thirty day notice and comment period described in MTCA's irnplementing regulations (WAC 173-340-500(3). Phillips 66's Potentially Liable Person Waiver is enclosed. The Preliminary Determination of Liability letter includes certain statements regarding a corporate relationship between Union Oil Company of California ("Union Oil') and Phillips 66 that are factually and materially incorrect. There is no corporate predecessor or successor relationship between Phittips 66 and lJnion Oil. ln1997, Tosco Corporation acquired a portion of the Site (Parcel Nurnbers 408880-3355-05 and 198720-0015-04, collectively, the "Southem Parcels") from Union Oil ifl a large, anns'Jength asset acquisition on April 1, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation Management Phillips 66 Company 76 Broadway Sacramento, CA, 95818
    6347 Seaview Avenue Northwest Seattle, Washington 98107 Telephone 206-781-1449 Fax 206-781-1543 www.atcgroupservices.com October 23, 2019 Mr. Ed Ralston Program Manager – Remediation Management Phillips 66 Company 76 Broadway Sacramento, CA, 95818 RE: Data Gaps Work Plan Phillips 66 Facility No. 255353 (AOC #1396) 600 Westlake Ave North Seattle, Washington ATC Project No. Z076000073 Washington Department of Ecology Facility ID 46445373 Washington Department of Ecology VCP #NW1714 Dear Mr. Ralston: ATC Group Services LLC (ATC) is pleased to submit this Work Plan to Phillips 66 Company (Phillips 66) for the above referenced facility, located at 600 Westlake Avenue North in Seattle, Washington (Site). The objective of this work plan is to present a scope of work to conduct site investigation activities in order to further assess current conditions at the Site and fill data gaps as requested by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in their opinion email dated August 21, 2018. For the purposes of this proposed investigation, the scope of work will be limited to releases relating to the former Unocal station at 600 Westlake Ave North. SITE DESCRIPTION The former service station property is located on the southwest portion of the Seattle City block bordered by Westlake Avenue to the west, Terry Avenue to the East, Valley Street to the North and Mercer Street to the South. The service station on the parcel in the southwest corner of the block was originally constructed by Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) in 1965 and was referred to as the Westlake 76 station, Tosco Corporation acquired the Westlake 76 station from Unocal in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Refiners
    Value Creation by Independent Refiners The Refiners: Value Creation 2001- 3Q 2013 University of Houston, C.T. Bauer College of Business Student Research Project This report is developed solely for the purpose of class discussion. Cases and reports do not represent endorsements by the faculty or the C.T. Bauer College of Business on effective or ineffective management. 1 Value Creation by Independent Refiners Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Summary of Findings 3. Independent Refiners a. HollyFrontier b. Marathon Petroleum c. Phillips 66 d. Tesoro e. Valero 4. Conclusions 2 Value Creation by Independent Refiners 1. Introduction 1.1 Research Objectives This report documents the findings of a research project undertaken by students in the C.T. Bauer College of Business MBA program at the University of Houston. The purpose of the project was to understand how Independent Refiners have created value for their shareholders and other stakeholders in the past, and the strategic lessons that can be learned from their successes and failures. The intent has been to create a vehicle that will integrate the capabilities within the C.T. Bauer School of top tier academic research with experience-based knowledge of the challenges facing energy companies. Through this integration and our long time frame looking back and forward ten years, we hope to provide a set of analyses and commentaries that will complement existing reports available from financial institutions and will be useful both to financial institutions and to the companies studied. This report is the first report covering a sector outside the upstream. Prior reports have covered the Super-majors, National Oil Companies and Independents.
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers in the Petroleum Industry:;
    '.. ' ~~~). , " cMERGERS IN THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY:; REPORT OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION C'V\UE CUMM/ APR 2 :' 1983 . LrRR A. "\\'l , SEPTEMBER 1982 :'; ACKNOWLEDGMENT This report was jointly prepared by the Bureaus of Competitonand Economics under the supervision of Thomas J. Campbell, Director; Walter T. Winslow, Deputy Director; and Ronald B. Rowe, Assistant Director, Bureau o Competition; and Robert Tollson, Director; John L. Peterman, Deputy Director; and David T. Scheffman, Acting Associate Director for Special Projects, Bureau of Economics. Bureau of Competition Deputy Assistant Director Marc G. Schildkraut supervised the research and drafting of the report by staff attorneys David C. Dickey, DanielP. Ducore, Gregory M. Fox, David Frankel, James M. Giffin, Jeffrey S. Jacobovitz, Wiliam Kovacic, Rhett R. Krulla, Frank Lipson, Arthur J. Nolan and Mark L. Rosenberg; and Research Analysts Harvey Blumenthal, Judith S. Carman, Lawrence R. Kaufman, Eileen C. Reed, Marissa G. Repp and Warren S. Sockwell. , Attorneys Eugene A. Higgins, David Lira, Constance M. Salemi, and John F. Stephens; and Research Analyst Nancy M. Ovuka also contributed to the report. Bureau of Economics Acting Assistant Director fhilp B. Nelson supervised the research and drafting of the report by staff economists Geary H. Gessler, Scott M. Harvey, John M. Howell, James A. Hurdle, Christopher C. Klein, PauL A. Pautler, John Phelps, Charles Pidano , Calvin T. Roush, Jr., and Willam Shughart; and statistical clerks Barbara J. Battle, Lynn Jay Carpenter, Delores A. Munson, Carolyn Samuels, John P. Sharpe, Jr., David L. Wickam , Addie L. Wiliams, and Cheryl G. Wiliams. James M. Ferguson, Assistant Director for Antitrust, provided substantial help in the review process.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Strategic Price Setting in Retail Gasoline Markets
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore Pardee RAND Graduate School View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world’s leading producer of Ph.D.’s in policy analysis. The dissertation has been supervised, reviewed, and approved by the graduate fellow’s faculty committee. An Analysis of Strategic Price Setting in Retail Gasoline Markets Florencia Jaureguiberry This document was submitted as a dissertation in July 2010 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH CARE SERVICES AGENCY ALEX BRISCOE, Agency Director
    ALAMEDA COUNTY HEALTH CARE SERVICES AGENCY ALEX BRISCOE, Agency Director ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1131 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 250 Alameda, CA 94502-6577 (510) 567-6700 FAX (510) 337-933 October 21, 2014 411 W MacArthur LLC Arthur Yu & Kevin Ma 650 “B” Fremont Ave., #375 411 W MacArthur Blvd. Los Altos, CA 94024 Oakland, CA 94609-2808 ConocoPhillips Company / Chevron Corporation Phillips 66 Attn: Nicole Arceneaux Attn: Ed Ralston 6101 Bollinger Canyon Road, Room 5119 76 Broadway Street San Ramon, CA 94583 Sacramento, CA 95818 Subject: Fuel Leak Case No. RO0000251 and Geotracker Global ID T0600101472, UNOCAL #3538, 411 West MacArthur Blvd., Oakland, CA 94609; Add Responsible Parties Dear Responsible Parties: In a Notice of Responsibility dated March 9, 1992, the Union Oil Company of California was notified that the above referenced site had been placed in the Local Oversight Program and that the Union Oil Company of California was named as a Responsible Party for the fuel leak case. Through a series of mergers acquisitions and spin offs, Union Oil Company of California became TOSCO, then ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66 Company, Chevron Oil Company and, most recently, the Chevron Corporation. Union Oil Company of California acquired the property in March 1983. TOSCO Corporation acquired the property in April 1997. Chevron Corporation and Phillips 66 have been named additional Responsible Parties for the fuel leak case as defined under 23 C.C.R Sec. 2720. Arthur Yu & Kevin Ma acquired the property in April 1999 and has been named an additional Responsible Party for the fuel leak case as defined under 23 C.C.R Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the Conocophillips Retiree Medical – Pre-Age 65 Plan
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE CONOCOPHILLIPS RETIREE MEDICAL – PRE-AGE 65 PLAN This supplement is a legally required Summary of Material Modifications (SMM) to the ConocoPhillips Retiree Medical – Pre-Age 65 Plan (“Pre-Age 65 Plan”), a component plan of the ConocoPhillips Retiree Medical and Dental Plan. When combined with the Retiree Benefits Handbook effective January 1, 2021, these documents summarize the terms of the Pre-Age 65 Plan and all amendments related to the Pre-Age 65 Plan through December 31, 2020. The current change is described below with reference to the specific page of the 2021 Retiree Benefits Handbook. Please retain this SMM with your 2021 Retiree Benefits Handbook. Page B-8, the Section titled Dependent Eligibility, in the last paragraph of the left column addressing children, is amended as to eligibility of a disabled dependent age 26 or older to read as follows: You can cover the child/stepchild/domestic partner’s child if he or she is: - Under age 263, or - A disabled dependent over age 26 who was disabled prior to age 26. 3. Your child is considered an eligible dependent up to age 26 regardless of student status, marital status, employment status and/or IRS dependent requirements. Please note, your receipt of this email does not necessarily mean you are eligible for or participating in this plan. To be eligible to participate in a particular plan, you must meet the eligibility requirements outlined for that plan. The Company reserves the right to amend or terminate a plan at any time in its sole discretion. 2021 RETIREE
    [Show full text]