FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING Gilroy Unified School District — Annex Room Aug. 10, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. *Meet at Gilroy High School at 8:30 a.m. for walk-through 1. ITEM PAGE # A. Approval of minutes: June 1, 2018 1-6 2. Facilities & New Construction (Jim Bombaci) ITEM SITE VENDOR COST FUNDING PAGE SOURCE # A. Ratification of Contract CHS City Pool Jerome Zalinski $4,500.00 Gen Fund 7 Increase B. Ratification of Contract GECA Jerome Zalinski $9,000.00 Measure E 8 C. Ratification of Contract El Roble ES School Site $26,780.00 Measure E 9-15 Increase Solutions D. Ratification of Contract CHS Lab Kent $19,153.14 Project Lead Construction the Way, Computer 16-18 Science Academy E. Ratification of Contract Brownell MS Aedis Pilot $9,750.00 Measure E 19-22 Program F. Ratification of Contract Brownell MS RJA $18,950.00 Measure E 23-29 G. Ratification of Contract Brownell MS Earth Systems $31,250.00 Measure E 30-34 Pacific 3. Maintenance (Dan McAuliffe) ITEM SITE VENDOR COST FUNDING PAGE SOURCE #

A. Mural Rucker Parent Club No cost to the Rucker Parent 35-36 District Club B. Pool gate hinge upgrade CHS ASI $6,988.00 RRM 37-38 (as required per County Health Dept.) C. New HVAC enclosure Luigi MPR ASI $8,360.00 RRM 39-40 D. Added work for new SVMS Gym CSF $5,175.00 RRM 41 volleyball equipment installation E. Playground wood infill top- All Playgrounds Jet Mulch $30,411.55 RRM 42-47 off, all sites (as per ASCIP Playground Inspection recommendation and report) F. 40’ storage containers GHS N/A N/A Donation to GHS 48-51 Football Boosters G. Softball batting cage GHS Home Depot/ No cost to 10K Home N/A INFORMATION Billy Holler district Depot donation other labor and materials by Billy Holler H. Flagpole replacement GHS Stadium P.H. Bolander $4,895.00 RRM 52-55

I. Weed abatement fire New School Living Systems $8,750.00 RRM 56-57 prevention with sheep and Property Land Plus $1,400.00 goats Management City Permit Fees, $1,000.00 deposit to be returned when done J. Roofing Brownell Gym TREMCO $75,000.00 Measure E 58-60 Budget K. Roofing Luigi Bldgs. 5-9, TREMCO $140,000.00 Deferred 61-62 10-13, 14-21 Budget Maintenance L. GHS stadium lighting Gilroy High GLS, Inc. $14,200.00 RRM budget 63 4. Alvaro Meza’s Items ITEM PAGE # A. Pics from tour of Cupertino High – Folio buildings by Blach Construction 64-69 B. Pics from tour of Pittsburg High – PreFast Buildings 70-74 C. Keying requests from school sites N/A

Facilities Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: June 1, 2018

Present: James Pace Linda Piceno Debbie Flores Alvaro Meza Gary Heap – City of Gilroy Jorge Duran – City of Gilroy Pat Midtgaard Anna O’Connor Dan McAuliffe Jim Bombaci

CITY OF GILROY: UPDATE ON CITY PROJECTS: ● Hecker Pass: most of it is built out only remaining piece out of entire area ● Another 73 units, north side of Hecker Pass, location of future round about, to be started in August. Roundabout is on 152 (at Autumn), 9 units are in on Pimentel, middle of whole area, remaining triangle piece ● Dog park is scheduled to open July 2nd, a lot of details still need to be completed ● Bike trail is going to loop around going parallel on 152, going to be constructed with the roundabout, making a loop. ● Glen Loma that project is moving very quickly, completed the sewer moving in to the storm, that whole area is going to be 113 units. ● Ballybunion scheduled to start in 5 weeks, doing pot-holing and utilities ● They are phasing it starting in area closest to the school site (ASMS) and the running towards ● Town Center is the tentative map is completed. IDK if has been scheduled for council. Would say probably next year, in the planning phase but as far as actual construction at least a year if not more out. ● 2 town center projects one BMR and one market rate ● Commercial part of town center is down the road ● Grove Luchessa project intersection of Santa Teresa and Miller and 10th that is going before Council on June 4th (next Monday), going to start construction shortly after 98 units, single family detached. Have had numerous meeting to talk about temporary bypass in miller. The net results are going to be limited impact. They have to connect 10th street to that roundabout, priority is to try to get it done asap because of garlic festival, construction should start within the next 3 weeks (construction of the road in that development) ● Santa Teresa and 1st that is going to attend a map extension project as far as when best guess would be probably 2 years out. That map got extended, going Monday to approve the extension as well. That is 200 townhomes

1 ● Glen Loma ranch a lot of projects are already in planning, would be a period of about 2 years more or less ● Apartment complex on 1st behind taco bell-has been pulled they are not pursuing that one any further ● North part, Harvest Park 2 area, Cohansey and Monterey there is 89% complete on single family home portion, also about 85-90% complete in apartment portion 60someting apartment units ● Construction across the creek, bridge is going to be on Cohansey going over the bridge, this will , is in the works ● Alexander station, trying to get occupancy by the end of the year ● Another project Monterey Manor apartments those have been previously approved, design is 98% complete, will start construction early next year, It is senior housing, to the south of 10th street ● Some industrial work happening on industrial part of city ● Mfg. site on Monterey Street, starting again in about 3 weeks. (food processing facility), projected over 100 jobs ● Storage units over by Home Depot ● Outcomes of GHS parent meeting, most concerned about improvements around school, frontage of school, bridge, etc. developers have decision to make in the next year or so for bridge, there has to be some ● Some improvements on Princeville and some additional signage ● Crossing at 10th and orchard, really want lights, will keep our eyes out. ● Rectangular light beacons is about 30K ● Very active with the safe routes to school ● Looking for opportunities for funding, need design etc. something like that is 8-10K for design alone. ● Maybe a good topic for the joint session, (assist with funding) ● High Speed Rail they are still looking at different options, meeting next Friday at the Old Gilroy City Hall. ● Still an option to locate station out on east side of 101, looking more in downtown station and continue along corridor. ● Come recently to put up on structure same area, reduce design speed to 85mph, be up in the air, helps in terms of construction ● Project is not funded yet, not funded past fresco station ● Levee-project that will be starting this summer along Uvas Creek levee, right now rodent infestation degraded quality of the levee where they need to redo the entire levee ● Water district is going to be cutting out slopes on either side of path and rebuilding just along the surface going to start in august, doing a neighborhood meeting later on towards the end of the summer, will be doing council information later in June (this is the water district), going to take about one year they will keep it open as much as possible but there is certain times where they will be on the trail. ● Solorsano side it unaffected by this work.

2 ● Going to need to talk about the Brownell design, going to substantially change the parking and flow of project. Run it by us early on to get some feedback ● By our next meeting bring preliminary design to share with this committee.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ● Motion made to approve minutes by Dan Mcauliffe ● James Pace second it

BROWNELL MS PIPELINE SAFETY HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND DAM INUNDATION STUDY: ● Pipeline on 1st st. is 8 and one they are proposing is 24 ● Started doing part of it, construction going on

GECA SCIENCE LAB: ● Have to move 2 classrooms in to storage containers ● Price went from $5,600 and dropped by $300 is $5,300 ● Going to the board on the 14th of June CHS shade structure, ● Just about complete ● From the beg when dropped that stuff off to today ● They had to get all steel retested for $19K

GHS AUTO SPRAY BOOTH ● Planned to be purchased for GHS ● A lot more to this than just buying booth and bolting ● The existing slab there, ● Jerome our IOR has reviewed information we have and all along thought it was going to be a simple installation, convinced DSA requires and architect and most likely a fire suppression system and utilities, will be a bay area quality control permit, EPA permit, county permit, do take careful monitoring and inspection ● Fire Marshall will be inspecting it ● Booth itself will be funded $60K CTE, $30K one time funds ● Find out how many students will be in those sections in the fall ● Will talk to Marco about it and get a cost estimate

LUIGI APREA CANVAS LUNCH SHADE COVERS ● 8 of them ● 2 severely storm damaged ● NSP 3 has been a very good vendor the other one never responded ● $18,538 for all 8. Would like to take this to the board on the 14th ● Did the district pay for the other ones, parent club was very involved

3 ● Since we have done the others we should do this ● How much did Brownell structure cost? It was 100K plus ● The metal structure that holds canvas in place is in great shape

GLEN VIEW, EL ROBLE, LUIGI, ROD KELLEY METAL OUTDOOR LUNCH TABLES: ● Same bid, Belson ● Lowest bidder for Rucker and Brownell, did seek other bids ● Would like to bring this on the 14th ● All of our schools are being taken care of ● Will swap out some at MMHS ● Try to make them a deal and sell them to the garlic festival ● Do have some lumber purchase about a year ago can repair if needed ● After this probably 95-100% completed

LAS ANIMAS BEAUTIFICATION: ● Information ● Parent Club would like to buy benches, table and umbrella ● Would like to put two long benches to put out in front of school ● Close to the wall at the entrance to the school in front of the office on either side of entrance door ● Round table on side of admin ● Would have to hear from Silvia as to why they think this is important ● Understand the benches in front, only questioning the round table ● GHS FLAGPOLE: ● One at stadium is in poor condition ● Had a work order to fix pulley system cannot raise it all the way, guys went out and said it is becoming dangerous ● Just found out before track meet ● Contacted PH Bolander has not gotten back to us with a price ● Need to look at replacing flagpole, old fiber glass poll in very poor support ● Would like to come to the board on the 14th with a full quote from Bolander

MISC SITES floro replacements: ● Contact all school sites and ask to let us know what they want us to review ● Request trickling in ● This price is no longer the price ● This will be about $6k price increase of what we have now ● Cottage floors has been incredible, this year’s package is a little more of what we have in the past ● Switch it over to Deferred maintenance for this year ● Taking on the 14th with deferred maintenance

4 CHS DOOR ALARMS: ● Information ● When they did the assessment, doors that face cougar can be breached quite easily, kids open them, up and let people in. ● There is an alarm it would sound at that door only similar to a fire alarm, they run on batter power ● Only issue that the site brought up is that they allow staff to use that door ● Don’t have a good solution for this, did propose teachers may need to use the front door ● Dr. Flores says teachers have voiced concerns because people gain access and it is by the black box ● It has a key to access from the outside, kids are using the crash bar and allowing people in who should not be in. ● There is more elaborate systems but need to be expensive ● The alarm goes off what happens? We can put an alarm box there with a code ● Does not alarm that whole site like a fire alarm just that door way ● Get a couple and try on a couple of doors ● Was told wanted to alarm the doors along cougar and black box (4) we alarm all those ● How to proceed: Dr. Flores will talk to Greg ● Dan can get these overnight

LUIGI APREA, GHS, BROWNELL ROOD NEEDS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ● Updated budgets for 3 sites consider priority ● Luigi need to get done and also Brownell can do this in late fall when weather is getting inclement ● Request to go out for bids for Luigi and Brownell contact roofers and get bids for that ● GHS is 2 part can split that and do part next year roll it over 2019 that would be the latest we can address without losing that area, is currently is not leaking ● Brownell leaking gym & Luigi need to address now ● Would like to do part of GHS, there is 4 areas that are in poor condition, and also the sidewalls ● In Brownell supposed to be part of the project, money should be taken from the project (fund out of measure E), need to get it done before this winter ● Luigi will be deferred maintenance (maybe do it over two years so it does not wipe down the budget)

CHS PAINTING: ● Caroline asked to get painting bid ● Christopher’s offered to pay for the painting ● Contacted 6 painters on cuppca list only 2 bid ● Cypress painting gave lowest price of $106K, power washing, painting handrails, upper and lower doorways in main entrance, A & B building. Focusing on gym and foyer. ● Need to clean the site this summer and IT is upgrading & prop 39 ● Would love to get this site painted, can we wait until summer of 2019? ● Can probably get some cleaning done if empty the classroom and put everything in the corridors

5 ● Fairly similar pricing on interior ● Can we just do the exterior for now? And that can be simultaneous? ● Dan will propose with Cypress if they are willing to look at that. ● Have not shared pricing with Caroline other than verbally, will give her the formal bids first ● If it is not funded we cannot pay for it, we have other schools that are in far worse shape ● Will talk more with Caroline so she can communicate with Christopher’s

6 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF JEROME R. ZALINSKI P.O. Box 36, Gustine, Ca. 95322-0036 Cell (209) 652-9447 Office (209) 854-2370Fax (209) 854-1842 Calif. Contractors Lic. # 356114 DSA/ORS Cert. # 2520 OSHPD Cert.# 20814

June 15, 2018

Mr. James Bombaci Facilities Director Gilroy Unified School District 7810 Arroyo Circle Gilroy, CA 95020

Mr. Bombaci

We are pleased to provide you with an proposal for added inspection services for Christopher High School Shade Structures (at the Pool area) construction project in the Gilroy Unified School District. The proposal is based on project set-up; pre-construction preliminaries, on-site construction ((00) equals total weeks estimated on site) project close out and project close out. Project Description and proposal amount as follows:

C.H.S. Shade Structures (4) ((50 hours times $90.00 per hour) (30 on-site, 20 administation)) =$4,500 Proposal is based on 4 weeks of part time coverage during the on-site construction duration during the month of June 2018 Any work that is completed after June 30th 2018 will be billed at $135.00 per hour. If on-site duration exceeds four weeks addition time will be billed at $135 per hour with 4 hour minimum per day,

______Total minimum amount to be billed = $4,500

District to supply each Inspector with a minimum 8ft by 12ft (96 sq. ft.) of office space on project site for Summer projects (10 weeks or less) and 8ft by 20ft (160 sq. ft.) for projects with duration exceeding 10 weeks.With internet connection available in office. Office MUST be left on- site until ALL (includes punch list) work is completed on-site. Class 2 Inspectors may be assigned to these projects. Estimates are based on plans, specification and information received on or before the above date. If the schedule duration is extended or accelerated by the School District or the Contactor, or additional work is added to the project scope, additional costs may be incurred by the District under this proposal. Proposal is based on coverage on all projects as noted above. If District, Architect or DSA requires additional coverage on any of the noted projects that project budget shall be reevaluated. Projects must close out within 90 days of substantial completion/occupancy for projects up to 10 weeks scheduled duration and 180 days of projects exceeding 10 weeks of scheduled duration or addition costs may incur. This proposal shall be an attachment to any contract issed by the District for the above noted work.

Thank You

Jerome R. Zalinski Principal Inspector

DSA/ORS PROJECT INSPECTOR****GENERAL CONTRACTOR

7 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF JEROME R. ZALINSKI P.O. Box 36, Gustine, Ca. 95322-0036 Cell (209) 652-9447 Office(209) 854-2370Fax (209) 854-1842 Calif. Contractors Lic.# 356114 DSA/ORS Cert.# 2520 OSHPD Cert.# 20814

June 25, 2017

Mr. James Bombaci Facilities Director Gilroy Unified School District 7810 Arroyo Circle Gilroy, CA 95020

Mr. Bombaci

We are pleased to provide you with proposals for inspection services for Science Classroom Cabinet project at Christopher High School in the Gilroy Unified School District. The proposal is based on project set-up; pre- construction preliminaries, on-site construction equals total weeks estimated on site and project close out).

Project Description and proposal amount as follows:

Christopher High School Science Class Room cabinet project 100 hrs times $90.00 per =$9,000 Proposal is based on part time coverage during the on-site construction duration ______Total Anticipated budget =$9,000

District to supply each Inspector with a minimum 8ft by 12ft (96 sq. ft.) of office space on project site for Summer projects (10 weeks or less) and 8ft by 20ft (160 sq. ft.) for projects with duration exceeding 10 weeks.With internet connection available in office. Office MUST be left on- site until ALL (includes punch list) work is completed on-site. Class 2 Inspector may be assigned to these projects. Estimates are based on plans, specification and information received on or before the above date. If the schedule duration is extended or accelerated by the School District or the Contactor, or additional work is added to the project scope, additional costs may be incurred by the District under this proposal. Proposal is based on coverage on all projects as noted above. If District, Architect or DSA requires additional coverage on any of the noted projects that project budget shall be reevaluated. Projects must close out within 90 days of substantial completion/occupancy for projects up to 10 weeks scheduled duration and 180 days of projects exceeding 10 weeks of scheduled duration or addition costs may incur. This proposal shall be an attachment to any contract issed by the District for the above noted work.

Thank You

Jerome R. Zalinski Principal Inspector

DSA/ORS PROJECT INSPECTOR****GENERAL CONTRACTOR

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

July 20, 2018 Proposal No.: HOL-18-07-004

Mr. James Bombaci Gilroy Unified School District Superintendent’s Office 7810 Arroyo Circle Gilroy, CA 95020

PROJECT: BROWNELL MIDDLE SCHOOL - NEW CAMPUS 7800 CARMEL STREET, GILROY, CA 95020

SUBJECT: Proposal for a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Geologic Hazards Evaluation, and Infiltration Rate Testing

Dear Mr. Bombaci: As requested by Mr. Manuel Ordonez with aedis Architects, we prepared this proposal to perform a geotechnical engineering investigation and a geologic hazards evaluation, as well as infiltration rate testing for the planned new campus at the existing Brownell Middle School located at 7800 Carmel Street in Gilroy, California. The project will require demolition of all but two of the existing buildings, the Multi-purpose building and the Gym, on the existing campus. New construction is expected to include the addition of a kitchen onto the existing Multi-purpose building, a new Library/Media Center building, Administrative building, six classroom buildings, a shade structure and a green amphitheater. We understand that final building layouts have not been determined at the time we prepared this proposal. Other planned improvements include parking lots, landscape, hardscape, play fields and utility improvements. Our proposed scope of work is based on a Site Plan dated June 5, 2018, and a Demolition Site Plan, both prepared by aedis Architects.

SCOPE OF SERVICES Geotechnical Engineering Investigation: Prior to initiating the subsurface investigation, the proposed boring locations will be marked, and Underground Service Alert (USA) and the client will be contacted to locate utilities that fall within their scope of services.

The California Division of the State Architect requires one boring for each 5,000 square feet of building area at the foundation level with a minimum of two borings per building. The number of proposed borings is based on the building footprints shown on the referenced Site Plan. To evaluate subsurface conditions, we plan to drill 12 borings at the classroom buildings, four borings at the administration and library buildings, one boring at the kitchen/existing multi-use building site, one boring at the shade structure location, four borings in the parking lot areas, and

30

Brownell Middle School – New Campus 2 July 20, 2018 Gilroy Unified School District

one additional boring in the amphitheater area (23 borings total). One of the borings at the classroom building site will be drilled to a depth of 45 feet for use in the assessment of seismic ground response and to evaluate the potential for liquefaction. The remaining borings will be 10 to 30 feet deep. The borings will be drilled using a truck-mounted rig. Soils encountered in the borings will be classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Copies of the boring logs will be included in the report. As required by the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the borings will be backfilled with cement grout.

Soil samples will be obtained using an internally-lined barrel sampler, standard penetration tests will be performed at selected intervals, and bulk samples will be obtained from the auger cuttings. Soil samples will be tested in the laboratory to identify properties such as moisture and density of ring samples, grain size distribution, plasticity index, unconfined compressive strength, and R-value. Soil corrosion potential testing will also be conducted in accordance with ASTM test methods. The corrosion tests will be performed by our subconsultant corrosion engineer, CERCO Analytical, Inc., and their report will include a brief evaluation of the test results. The actual number and types of tests to be performed will be determined by a Registered Geotechnical Engineer based upon the subsurface conditions encountered. In the event that obvious evidence of hazardous materials is encountered at the site during our field work, we will notify the School District of the finding and discuss recommendations for evaluation. All added costs incurred as a result of suspected hazardous substances would be charged on a time-and-expense basis over and above the established fees for the geotechnical and geologic investigation.

Two sets of two soil infiltration rate tests will be performed at depths ranging from 3 to 6 feet in borings drilled near the locations of the planned bioswales. The infiltration tests will be performed in general accordance with the Deep Quick Infiltration Testing Methodology, as detailed in the document Native Soil Assessment for Small Infiltration-Based Stormwater Control Measures prepared by Earth Systems Pacific for the Central Coast Low Impact Initiative (2013). The test results will be included in the geotechnical engineering report and will include a brief description of the test methods, a map showing the approximate test locations, and tables of the infiltration test results.

The field and laboratory data will be reviewed by a Registered Geotechnical Engineer and evaluated with respect to development of criteria for site preparation and grading, foundations, slabs-on-grade and exterior concrete flatwork, utility trenches, asphalt concrete pavement sections, site drainage and finish improvements, and geotechnical observation and testing. If potentially liquefiable soils are encountered in the borings, a quantitative liquefaction evaluation will be conducted in general accordance with the California Geological Survey’s Special Publication 117A, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California.

The following items will be addressed in the geotechnical engineering section of the report:

31

Brownell Middle School – New Campus 3 July 20, 2018 Gilroy Unified School District

• Soil and groundwater conditions encountered, • Expansion potential of the soil, • Liquefaction potential of the site, • Preparation of the site prior to grading, • Grading criteria, • Types and depths of foundations, • Maximum allowable bearing capacities, • Seismic coefficients for use in foundation design, • Total and differential settlement, • Resistance to lateral loads, • Subslab ground treatment, • Exterior concrete flatwork, • Utility trench backfill, • Asphalt concrete pavement sections, • Soil infiltration test results, • Surface drainage and finish improvements, and • Geotechnical observation and testing.

Once earthwork specifications have been developed based on our geotechnical recommendations, we will review the specifications for conformance with our recommendations and provide guidance on additions or omissions deemed necessary.

Geologic Hazards Evaluation: The school site is not located within a Seismic Hazard Zone as shown on California Geological Survey’s Gilroy 7.5-minute quadrangle. Additionally, according to Santa Clara County Geologic Hazard Maps, the property is also outside of County hazard zones.

For the geologic hazards evaluation, a Certified Engineering Geologist will perform a site reconnaissance and review available geologic literature pertaining to the site and its vicinity. Historical and current aerial photographs (as available) will be reviewed and interpreted with respect to geomorphology and any unusual geologic features or anomalies. A site geologic map will be developed based on the above-information and on a review of information obtained during the subsurface investigation.

A seismic analysis of the site will be performed to assess the presence of faults that could have an impact upon the site. The analysis will consist of reviewing earthquake fault maps and performing a seismic computer analysis of faults within a 65-mile radius of the site. The seismic analysis will also provide information to address strong ground shaking at the site. Secondary seismic hazards such as liquefaction, seismically induced landsliding, seismically-induced settlement, flooding, acute erosion, tsunami, potential for naturally-occurring asbestos and radon will also be addressed.

32

Brownell Middle School – New Campus 4 July 20, 2018 Gilroy Unified School District

The geologic hazards section of the report will address the following: • Geologic structure and stratigraphy, • Regional faults and their relationship to the site, • Magnitude and epicentral distance of significant past nearby earthquakes, • Seismic hazards such as ground shaking and ground rupture, • Potential for liquefaction, • Potential for seismically-induced settlement, • Potential for landslides, • Setbacks from slopes, • Potential for flooding, acute erosion, Tsunami, and other water-related hazards.

Because the seismic parameter S1 for the site calculated using the general procedure for seismic hazard evaluation is less than 0.75g, a site-specific design response spectral analysis is not required and is not included in our proposed scope of work.

Report Preparation: Information gathered during the geotechnical engineering investigation and the geologic hazards evaluation will be compiled into a combined geotechnical engineering and geologic hazards report. The geotechnical engineering portion of the report will be intended to be in conformance with Sections 1803A.2 through 1803A.6 and J104.3 of the 2016 California Building Code (CBC), and common geotechnical engineering practice in this area at this time under similar conditions. The Geologic Hazards Evaluation will be intended to be in conformance with California Geological Survey Special Publication 117A and Note 48, and common engineering geologic practice in this area at this time under similar conditions. The results of the soil corrosivity testing and evaluation by CERCO Analytical, Inc., will be included as an appendix to the report. Because Earth Systems Pacific does not practice corrosion engineering, and if recommendations to protect below grade piping from corrosion are needed, a corrosion engineer would be retained to develop such recommendations. The cost to retain a corrosion engineer would be invoiced on a time and materials basis and is not included in our proposed fee below.

Analysis of the soil for LID/BMP improvements, mold or other microbial content, contaminants or other chemical properties; radon testing; estimates of material shrinkage; construction issues within the domain of contractors; foundation plan reviews; meeting attendance; consultation subsequent to the investigation not discussed above; construction observation and testing, and any other services not specifically noted in the preceding paragraphs are beyond the scope of the proposed work.

33

Brownell Middle School – New Campus 5 July 20, 2018 Gilroy Unified School District

FEES We propose to provide the geotechnical engineering investigation and geologic hazards evaluation on a fixed fee basis.

Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Geologic Hazards Evaluation, and Infiltration Rate Testing $31,250.00

SCHEDULE AND CONDITIONS The fees and conditions of this proposal will remain in effect for a period of 90 days. We understand that the District has requested the report be delivered by August 31, 2018. If site access and written authorization to proceed with the proposed scope of work is received by July 26th, 2018, we can meet the District request and deliver the report by August 31, 2018. If authorization is not provided by the aforementioned date, an alternative schedule (pushing the delivery date out) can be developed.

Prior to initiating the subsurface investigation, Underground Service Alert will be contacted to locate utilities that fall within their scope of services. However, responsibility for accurate location of underground utilities lies with the client, and Earth Systems Pacific shall not be held responsible for damage resulting from the incomplete or inaccurate identification of underground utilities.

Terms for our services will be negotiated prior to initiating work on the project.

We thank you for your consideration of our firm for this project. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience if you have any questions or require additional information.

Sincerely, Earth Systems Pacific

George Barnett, GE 2309 Brett Faust, CEG 2386 Senior Vice President Vice President

Doc. No.: 1807-090.PRP/ev

34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 975 Chestnut Street San Jose, CA 95110 (408)298-6670 LIC# C10-4666869 TO: Gilroy High School DATE: 8/2/2018 ATTENTION: Dan McAuliffe PHONE: 408-842-8297 REFERENCE Gilroy High School-Stadium Lighting EMAIL: [email protected] Proposal We are pleased to present this proposal to re-lamp the football stadium lighting at Gilroy High School.

The scope of work below is a fixed cost: • Crane Rental and Man basket • Labor & Ground Support Total $14,200

The scope of work below will be billed only as needed: • 1500 Watt Metal Halide Lamps $145 • Replace existing fixture with new $750 • Replace ballast kit only in existing fixture $425

Anticipated Scope: • 10-12 Lamps Replaced • 1- New Fixture • 1- New Ballast

Exclusions/ Clarification:

1 Work will be completed during normal working hours 2 All permit fees are excluded

GENERAL LIGHTING SERVICE INC. 975 CHESTNUT STREET•SAN JOSE, CA 95110-1505 (408)289-6670•FAX (408)298-6795 LIC#C10-466869 63 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

64 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

65 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

66 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

67 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

68 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL

69 PITTSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL

70 PITTSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL

71 PITTSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL

72 PITTSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL

73 PITTSBURGH HIGH SCHOOL 74