Private Strategies, Public Policies & Food System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready. -
The Abuse of Supermarket Buyers
The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele, SOMO & Bob Young, Europe Economics On behalf of: AAI- Agribusiness Accountability Initiative Amsterdam, March 2009 Colophon The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele (SOMO) & Bob Young (Europe Economics) March 2009 Funding: This publication is made possible with funding from The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs via SOMO and DGOS (Belgian Directorate General for Development Cooperation) via Vredeseilanden (VECO). Published by: AAI - Agribusiness Action Initiatives, formerly called Agribusiness Accountability Initiative The authors can be contacted at: SOMO Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector 2 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................................3 Summary .........................................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 1. Abusive buyer power problems are being discussed in many fora while a comprehensive -
Corporate Responsibility Report 2008
Corporate Responsibility Report 2008 FOR MORE INFORMATION www.ahold.com/reports2008 Corporate Responsibility Report 2008 1 Message from the CEO 2 Corporate responsibility 2 An integrated part of our business 2 Balancing the interests of people, planet and profit 3 Our priorities 3 The main corporate responsibility themes 3 The main components of our corporate responsibility strategy 4 Stakeholder engagement Ahold leaders agree CR priorities – page 2 Healthy living – page 5 Community engagement – page 24 Helping children make healthy choices Fighting hunger in our markets, and beyond, by supporting local food banks Sustainable trade – page 10 ICA improves control of its Asian supply chain Our people – page 28 Albert Heijn named best multicultural employer in the Netherlands Climate action – page 17 Group CO2 footprint and reduction target published 34 How we manage corporate responsibility 34 Corporate responsibility model and organization 34 How and why we set the current targets and key performance indicators 34 How we measure 35 Corporate responsibility steering committee 36 Our partnerships and memberships 37 Corporate affairs 37 About our corporate responsibility report 38 Group at a glance 38 Where we operate 39 Highlights 40 Our business 40 Our brands 46 Our leadership 47 Other information 47 Glossary 49 GRI cross-reference table 54 Contact information 54 Cautionary notice www.ahold.com/reports2008 AHOLD CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2008 | 1 Message from the CEO We had a successful year rolling out our corporate responsibility program. Our focus remained on healthy living, sustainable trade, climate action and community engagement, which are the areas where we are able to make the greatest impact. -
More Sustainable Food
MORE SUSTAINABLE FOOD: FRUIT AND VEGETABLES AT THE SUPERMARKET Consumers, JULY 2018 Consumers Association More sustainable food: fruit and vegetables at the supermarket 1 CONTENT Resume 4 preface 6 1 study Design 7 1.1 Research questions 7 1.2 Definition / scope 8 1.2.1 Selection supermarkets 8 1.2.2 Selection of case studies 8 1.2.3 Scope of the study 9 1.2.4 Definition and explanation term sustainable 10 1.3 Research Methods 10 1.3.1 Research supermarket policy 10 1.3.2 Consumer research 12 1.3.3 Research case studies 12 2 Results 13 2.1 Sustainability initiatives fruits and vegetables incl. Marks 13 2.1.1 Sustainability labels fruit and vegetables 13 2.1.2 Sustainability Initiatives fruit and vegetables 17 2.1.3 Sustainability Themes 18 2.1.4 International perspective 22 2.2 Supermarket Policy sustainability fruit and vegetables 25 2.2.1 Purchasing Organization Fruit & Vegetables 25 2.2.2 Sustainability generally Fruit & Vegetables 27 2.2.3 Environment: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 32 2.2.4 Social: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 40 2.2.5 Training & Support 47 2.2.6 Seasonal Products 49 2.2.7 Food waste 50 2.2.8 Final questions: challenges and responsibilities of supermarkets 54 2.2.9 Summary of results by supermarket chain 55 2.3 consumer research 57 2.3.1 The concept of sustainability 57 2.3.2 Purchase of vegetables and fruits 58 2.3.3 Consumers sustainability in fruit and vegetables 59 2.4 Results of case studies 61 2.4.1 Strawberry 63 2.4.2 Banana 72 2.4.3 Paprika 82 2.4.4 Green Bean 89 Consumers -
Participating Chain Pharmacies
PARTICIPATING CHAIN PHARMACIES A & P Pharmacy Discount Drug Mart Hy-Vee, Drug Town Network Pharmacy Shoppers Pharmacy ABCO Pharmacy Doc's Drugs Ingles Pharmacy Oncology Pharmacy Services Shoprite Pharmacy Acme Pharmacy Drug Emporium Integrity Healthcare Services P&C Food Market Shurfine Pharmacy Acme, Lucky, Osco, Sav-on Drug Fair Kare Pharmacy Pacmed Clinic Pharmacy Smith's Food & Drug Center Albertson's Pharmacy Duane Reade Kash N' Karry Pharmacy Pamida Pharmacy Snyder Drug Stores Allcare Pharmacy Eagle Pharmacy Kelsey Seybold Clinic Pharmacy Park Nicollet Pharmacy Southern Family Markets Ambulatory Pharmaceutical Services Edgehill Drugs Kerr Drug Pathmark Stadtlander Pharmacy Anchor Pharmacy Express, Thrift, Treasury Keystone Medicine Chest Payless Pharmacy Standard Drug Company Appletree Pharmacy Fagen Pharmacy King Kullen Pharmacy Pediatric Services of America Star Pharmacy Arrow Pharmacy Fairview Pharmacy Kinney Drug's Pharma-Card Statscript Pharmacy Aurora Pharmacy Family Care Pharmacy Kleins Supermarket Pharmacy Pharmacy Plus Steele's Pharmacy B J's Pharmacy Family Drug Klinck, Drug Barn Presbyterian Retail Pharmacy Stop & Shop Pharmacy Bakers Pharmacy Family Fare Klingensmith's Drug Price Chopper Pharmacy Super D Bartell Drugs Family Pharmacy Kmart Pharmacy Price Less Drug Super Food Mart Basha's United Drug Fedco Drug Knight Drugs Price Wise, Piggly Wiggly Super Fresh Pharmacy Bel Air Pharmacy Finast Pharmacy Kohlls Pharmacy Prime Med Pharmacy Super RX Pharmacy Big Bear Pharmacy Food 4 Less Pharmacy Kopp Drug Publix Pharmacy -
WHERE Do WE STAND on UPC IMPLEMENTATION
WHERE Do WE STAND ON UPC IMPLEMENTATION by Tom Wilson Vice President, McKinsey & Co. New York, New York I. Four topics will be discussed 2. Source symbol marking A. Status against program goals - Grocery manufacturers B. Public policy issues - Retailers (private - Price mark legislation label) - Labor union position 3. Availability of equipment c. Recent code council actions D. Open issues IV. Code conversion membership in UPCC II. Key dates in UPC development 1966 - Kroger Technology Conference 1975 Cumula- 1969 - IMS Test Installation to tive 1970 - AD HOC Committee formed 1972 1973 1974 Date Total (8/70) Manufac- 1971 - Code Selection Announced turers 209 578 1582 1284 3653 (5/71) 1972 - Code Council Formed (3/72) Retailers 84 62 58 24 228 First Number Issues (5/72) —— —— First U.S. Scanner Test 293 640 1640 1308 3881 (7/72) 1973 - Symbol Selection Announced (4/73) v. Source symbol marking Symbol Specifications Pub- A. Goal was to have 50 percent of lished (5/73) nonvariable weight items First UPC Scanner Announced source marked by year-end 1974, (10/73) 75 percent by year-end 1975. 1974 - First UPC Scanner Installed 1. Percentages are on all (6/74) commodity item movement 1975 - 50 Percent Source Symbol basis. Marking (5/75) 2. 50 percent source mark was First Price Mark Legislation economic break-even. (6/75) B. Progress by manufacturers judged sufficient to meet these III. Status against goals goals. A. Three basic measurers of UPC 1. Testing chains report 55-65 implementation percent level on shelf 1. Code conversion 2. Nielsen audit shows 58 - Membership in UGPCC percent in July - Use on shippers, paper work February 76/page 96 Journal of Food Distribution Researck VI, Percentage of items with UPC VIII. -
The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships Nirmalya KUMAR Singapore Management University, [email protected]
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Lee Kong Chian School of Business Business 11-1996 The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships Nirmalya KUMAR Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Marketing Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons Citation KUMAR, Nirmalya. The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. (1996). Harvard Business Review. 74, (6), 92-106. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5179 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships By: Kumar, Nirmalya, Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec96, Vol. 74, Issue 6, pp. 92-106. Trust is stronger than fear. Partners that trust each other generate greater profits, serve customers better, and are more adaptable. In industries as diverse as pharmaceuticals, consumer packaged goods, hardware, apparel, and furniture, the balance of power between manufacturers and retailers is shifting. Thanks to the rise of specialty superstores, the formation of buying alliances, and a consolidating wave of mergers and acquisitions, a relative handful of retailers often now control access to enormous numbers of consumers. -
Carter Primary Wins Helpful Both in Polls and Pocketbook
p a g e t h ir t y -s ix - MANCHESTER EVENING HERALD. Manchester, Conn., Wed., April 14, 1976 ‘‘ •> - ' -... '.V J EASTER FEASTS START ON MEAT STREET U.S.A The weather Inside today Area news .. 16, 17 Editorial ............. 4 Sunny today with high in the.70s. Business............... 9 Fam ily................. 8 Forest fire danger continues to be high, Classified_20-22 Gardening.........11 fair tonight, tows 45-50. Friday fair with Comics..........23 Obituaries.........12 / variabie cloudiness, highs in 70s. 4 ' Dear Abby..........23 Sports............. 13-15 Nattonat weather forecast map on * kS-. Bright Page 20. TWEim.FOCR PAGES All FInast Supermarkets will be Closed all day Easter TwasEcrtONs MANCHl^R.'tJONl^,'THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 1976-v VOL. XCV, No. 187 PRICE! FIFTEEN CENTS Sunday - A ll Your Friends at FInast Wish You A Happy Easter! ^USTOMERjJ Carter primary wins helpful C&H ^ Libby’S SUPERMARKETS both in polls and pocketbook B i i W a p is S u g ar Tom ato By ELIZABETH WHARTON California Gov. Edmund G. Brown negotiations until after the election. American Society of Newspaper ^ Qtrs Cniled Press Internaliunal Jr, 5 per cent. At a news conference in Austin, Editors panel by telephone Sweet Cream 1 lb pkg Jimmy Carter’s March primary Those figures represented a steady Tex., Wednesday, Reagan said there Wednesday to avoid crossing an NBC Confectionary ? Lightly Salted 6 9 ^ successes have helped him both in increase for both Carter and was an inconsistency between Ford's picket line around the hotel where With This Coupon & Purchase $5 or More. -
Oct 9 1979 -I- Libraries Community Development Corporations As an Instrument Of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF ECONOMIC POWER AND CHANGE: THE CODMAN SQUARE EXPERIENCE by GAIL LESLIE IENDALL B.A., Simmons College (1977) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF CITY PLANNING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MAY 15, 1979) JI Signature of Author.....- ......... .... ... ...... .. ............. Department of Urban Studies and Planning -A- .May 15, 1979 Certified by.........,. ..... ............ .......... Robert M. Hollister, Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ............ ..................................... ARCHIVE Chairman, Department Committee MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OCT 9 1979 -I- LIBRARIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF ECONOMIC POWER AND CHANGE: THE CODMAN SQUARE EXPERIENCE by GAIL LESLIE KENDALL Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 15, 1979 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of City Planning ABSTRACT Can community control of economic development work? This thesis explores the issue by looking at the formation and early activities of a community development corporation (CDC) in a racially, ethnically, socially and economically diverse neighborhood in Boston. It uses the experience of that neighborhood to answer specific ques- tions which relate to an organization's ability to meet with success in its economic development ventures while remaining an instrument through which all members of the community can control and affect their neighborhood economy. Community based economic development can work to bring about economic change and give power to those who, because of their race or native tongue, have been denied access to, and control over, those resources which deter- mine the fate of an individual business or an entire commercial district. -
Investigation Into Albert Heijn's Dominant Market Position Within
Investigation into Albert Heijn’s dominant market position within Amsterdam and whether it enables them to set prices significantly higher than its competitors’ Sean Blundell - 10398252 Abstract With a market share estimated to be around 30%, Albert Heijn is the indisputable market leader of the Dutch supermarket industry. It is a ubiquitous force throughout the Netherlands, especially within the city of Amsterdam, accounting for approximately 65% of all stores within the area. This spatial control, coupled with the evident lack of competition, may enable Albert Heijn to set prices significantly higher than its competitors, especially in those locations where competition is lacking. This study aims to provide evidence into the matter, via the analysis of prices. Over a four-month period, the prices of 35 items were collected from a sample of Albert Heijn stores and two of its competitors, Vomar and Dirk van den Broek. A largely descriptive statistical approach was adopted to analyse the data, with an adjusted Lerner index being utilised as the main method in distinguishing Albert Heijn’s market power. The overall Lerner index was found to be 0.1005, signifying that Albert Heijn does have considerably more market power than its competitors. Further analysis was focused on differentiating between AH’s pricing in locations where there is competition compared to those where competition is absent. Prices were found to be higher in locations without competition, however, this difference was found to not be statistically significant. 1. Introduction Anyone who has spent an extended period of time in Amsterdam will be all too familiar with the ever-present Albert Heijn (AH). -
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V. Q3 2020 Report
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V. Q3 2020 Report Issued on November 4, 2020 Page 1/31 Press Office: +31 88 659 5134 Social Media Investor Relations: +31 88 659 5213 Twitter: @AholdDelhaize Youtube: @AholdDelhaize www.aholddelhaize.com LinkedIn: @Ahold-Delhaize Interim report, Third quarter 2020 Ahold Delhaize reports strong Q3 results; announces initiatives to solidify position as industry- leading local omnichannel retailer in 2021 and beyond * Net sales were €17.8 billion, up 6.8%, or 10.1% at constant exchange rates * In the U.S. and Europe, comp sales growth excluding gas was up 12.4% and 7.5%, respectively * Net consumer online sales grew 62.6% at constant exchange rates; including 114.7% growth in the U.S. * COVID-19-related costs were approximately €470 million year to date, and approximately €140 million in Q3, including safety measures and enhanced associate pay * Underlying operating margin was 4.6%, up 0.2% points from the prior year at constant exchange rates * IFRS reported operating income was €207 million, impacted by the previously announced €577 million provision for a U.S. pension plan withdrawal * Diluted underlying EPS was €0.50, increasing 12.3%; diluted EPS was €0.06, unfavorably impacted by the provision for a U.S. pension plan withdrawal * 2020 underlying EPS outlook raised to growth in the high-20% range; continue to expect free cash flow to be at least €1.7 billion, net of Q4 payment for a U.S. pension plan withdrawal, and capital expenditures of around €2.5 billion * Announcing a new €1 billion share buyback program to start at the beginning of 2021 Zaandam, the Netherlands, November 4, 2020 – Ahold Delhaize, one of the world’s largest food retail groups and a leader in both supermarkets and e-commerce, reports third quarter results today. -
Fifty Ways to Grow in European Retail N
FIFTY FIFTY WAYS TO GROW IN GROW TO FIFTYWAYS WAYS TO EUROPEAN RETAILEUROPEAN GROW IN EUROPEAN RETAIL NEW BASED OPPORTUNITIES GROWTH ON POORLY MET SHOPPER NEEDS Overview of benchmarking companies More than 300 innovative concepts were reviewed from 20 countries. These are a good source of inspiration for business opportunities and more information about these examples can be found on our website www.rolandberger.co.uk/European-retail. A study conducted for the Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council Europe by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants in association with Europanel Copyright © 2011 Coca-Cola Services S.A. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. This report was prepared for CCRRCE by Roland Berger. This report is a summary for general information only. 2 50 ways to grow in European retail 50 ways to grow in European retail 3 About Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council Europe (CCRRCE) This report presents selected results of the CCRRCE study into growth opportunities in the European retail market, conducted by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants in association with Europanel. We wish to extend a special thanks to Anthony Freeling, the Research Director of CCRRCE. Composition of CCRRCE (as of October 2011): Contents Mr Albert Voogd, Albert Heijn, Mr François Bouriez, Groupe Louis Delhaize, THE NETHERLANDS FRANCE Executive summary 5 Ms Ann Carlsson, Apoteket, Mr Harald Antley, Aspiag Services, SWEDEN ITALY Where