Investigation Into Albert Heijn's Dominant Market Position Within

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigation Into Albert Heijn's Dominant Market Position Within Investigation into Albert Heijn’s dominant market position within Amsterdam and whether it enables them to set prices significantly higher than its competitors’ Sean Blundell - 10398252 Abstract With a market share estimated to be around 30%, Albert Heijn is the indisputable market leader of the Dutch supermarket industry. It is a ubiquitous force throughout the Netherlands, especially within the city of Amsterdam, accounting for approximately 65% of all stores within the area. This spatial control, coupled with the evident lack of competition, may enable Albert Heijn to set prices significantly higher than its competitors, especially in those locations where competition is lacking. This study aims to provide evidence into the matter, via the analysis of prices. Over a four-month period, the prices of 35 items were collected from a sample of Albert Heijn stores and two of its competitors, Vomar and Dirk van den Broek. A largely descriptive statistical approach was adopted to analyse the data, with an adjusted Lerner index being utilised as the main method in distinguishing Albert Heijn’s market power. The overall Lerner index was found to be 0.1005, signifying that Albert Heijn does have considerably more market power than its competitors. Further analysis was focused on differentiating between AH’s pricing in locations where there is competition compared to those where competition is absent. Prices were found to be higher in locations without competition, however, this difference was found to not be statistically significant. 1. Introduction Anyone who has spent an extended period of time in Amsterdam will be all too familiar with the ever-present Albert Heijn (AH). The supermarket retailer founded in 1887, has grown into a distinguished market leader within the Netherlands, capturing approximately 30% of the market (Loon, 2014). A recent investigation into the Netherland’s supermarket industry by the news corporation Z24, revealed that Albert Heijn is the dominant chain in the 25 largest cities. Furthermore, it highlighted the fact that for over half of Amsterdam’s inhabitants (52.8%), AH is their closest supermarket. This was not only the largest proportion of people closest to AH across all the cities, but also the highest amount for any of the supermarkets examined (Loon, 2014). Albert Heijn is an inescapable presence in the daily life of Amsterdam residents, regardless of their decision to shop there or not. An integral part of the motivation behind this research is the degree of choice available, as it can be posited that the Amsterdam grocery shopper has a very restricted choice set. A quick glance at figure 1 reveals both the abundance of AH stores, and how extensively distributed they are throughout the city of Amsterdam. This makes them the convenient choice for shoppers, as regardless of their location, they can be assured an Albert Heijn is in close proximity. Therefore, due to their availability and pervasiveness, shoppers are drawn in to AH’s supermarket before prices or product offering come into the decision-making process. This being said, Albert Heijn does offer a wide array of different products, with most goods being differentiated further with respect to quality. This, alongside organised and well-kept stores, helps AH provide, on average, a satisfying shopping experience. But what if you are not a satisfied customer? The most obvious solution is to shop at a different supermarket chain; but this highlights another issue surrounding the choices available to consumers. Two of AH’s biggest competitors in the Netherlands are Vomar and Dirk van den Broek, whose store locations in Amsterdam are provided in figure 2. Now, when compared with figure 1, this reveals quite an alarming fact regarding these competitors: that they are far less numerous, and far less evenly distributed across the city. None of the competitors are located within the canal rings, and are both scarcely present in the southern regions of Amsterdam. This leaves Albert Heijn essentially, unchallenged in these areas, while its substantial establishment of stores is likely to deter entry from competitors. Therefore, if consumers wish to switch away from AH, they are most likely to find it inconvenient to do so. This evidence strongly suggests that AH has a spatial monopoly within Amsterdam. Due to the insubstantial presence of competitors, the market influence they possess is likely to be limited; thus AH’s spatial dominance may translate into a market share dominance. This market Figure 1: Location of AH stores Figure 2: Location of Dirk van den Broek & Vomar Stores share dominance may then enable AH to exploit their position by setting prices higher than they would be under a competitive market setting and also alter prices to the disadvantage of the consumer. Therefore, this thesis aims to provide further information into the potential harmful impact of AH’s powerful position within Amsterdam, via the analysis of prices set by AH, Dirk van den Broek, & Vomar. First-hand data collected over a four-month period will undergo a variety of statistical tests. One of the fundamental tools that will be utilised is an adjusted version of the Lerner index, which will be used as a method of calculating the market power of Albert Heijn. This, along with the additional results generated, should provide an enhanced insight into price competition within the Amsterdam supermarket industry, and more importantly whether Albert Heijn sets prices significantly higher than its competitors. An ancillary enquiry will be made into whether AH’s store prices differ when in the presence of competitors. It is hypothesised that those stores without competition in close proximity will set higher prices than those with local opposition. The following literature review will provide intrinsic background information that will strengthen understanding and enable an effective evaluation. Section three will provide a detailed description of the methodology. The results will then be presented and evaluated in section 4. The final section concludes by providing an overview of the results and the key arguments established. 2. Literature Review A cause for concern that has grown over the last decade has been the increase in market concentration within the supermarket industry (Burt, 2010). This increased concentration creates the opportunity for supermarkets to develop and strengthen their own brand. Jan-Benedict et al. (1997) analysed Albert Heijn’s own store brand, ‘AH Huismerk’, in relation to the leading national brands. They discovered that as the concentration of the market specific to the product increases, the gap between the brand loyalty of national brands and AH Huismerk increased, corresponding in a higher divergence in prices as well. The reasoning given, is that those products existing in a more concentrated market face less competition, possess more market power and are therefore more able to set higher prices. This research is corroborated by Connor & Peterson (1992), who use an adjusted Lerner index within an empirical model, to reveal that as market concentration increases, the national brand to private label price margin widens. Since those studies, however, Albert Heijn’s number of outlets has grown and with it AH Huismerk, which now boasts almost 7000 products (Ah.nl, 2015). Due to AH Huismerk extensive growth and AH’s dominant market position within the Netherlands, it could be argued that AH Huismerk could be perceived as a national brand rather than a private label. An indication of this can be seen in certain product categories (e.g. Coffee), in which AH products score highly on brand loyalty. The market share of AH Huismerk products gives a clearer quantitative measure supporting this statement. For example, AH Coffee, which has a high brand loyalty, accounts for approximately 15.1% of the total sales in the retail coffee market (Dekimpe & Marnik, 1997). Therefore, if Albert Heijn has been able to transform its private label brand into a recognised national brand, at least for those products competing in a concentrated market, its prices for AH Huismerk goods may be substantially higher than competitors’ private label prices. This feasible position arguably enabled via AH’s overall market supremacy, may be compounded by the high concentration of the overall supermarket industry. This position may also be an extremely profitable one when taking into consideration that supermarkets tend to place higher retail margins on private label products than on comparable national brands (Albion, 1983; Connor & Peterson, 1992). To examine this, this paper will analyse the price margin between selected Huismerk products and competitors’ corresponding private label products. Despite the long history of spatial competition, with its origin dating back to the pioneering work of Hotelling (1929), little attention has been given to studying competition among firms who are able to set up multiple stores. This is presumably due to the analytical complexities that would arise if it were taken into consideration. However, in reality retailers are able to open multiple branches and a large number do, with those owning four or more outlets accounting for over half the total retail business in the United States (Pal & Sarkar, 2002). The majority of research on the matter has been concentrated on price competition, which yields the result that firms locate all stores at the same market point (Martinez-Giralt & Neven, 1988). This does not reflect the real world situation accurately, which prompted Pal & Sarkar (2002) to carry out their analysis with firms competing à la Cournot. They found that stores of competing firms might agglomerate at finitely many locations, which is consistent with the clustering of stores seen in reality. Dasci & Laporte (2004) highlight that operating multiple stores gives firms an instrument to apply a form of price discrimination by setting different prices at different stores. They observe, that a proportion of retailers have systematic price differences among their stores that cannot all be accredited to special offers or sales.
Recommended publications
  • Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
    Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sustainable Journey of Retailer Brands
    MARCA BY BOLOGNA FIERE 2020 THE SUSTAINABLE JOURNEY OF RETAILER BRANDS ITALY, Bologna | January 16th, 2020 THE SUSTAINABLE JOURNEY OF RETAILER BRANDS THE DUTCH CASE KOEN DE JONG THE UNITED STATES CASE THE FRENCH CASE THE DUTCH MARKET Retailer market shares - 2019 21.0% Coop 3.7 Deen 2.1 -0,1 % Dirk 3.7 Dekamarkt 1.7 -0,1 % Hoogvliet-0,4 % 2.1 Jan Linders 1.1 35.7% +0,2 % 25.8% Plus 6.4 = Poisz 1.0 -0,3 % Spar 1.2 + 0,3 % = others 3.7 0 1.8 3.5 5.3 7 10.7% 6.8% Sources: Nielsen/Distrifood/RABO/IPLC 2019 THE DUTCH MARKET Retailer market shares - 2019 21.0% Coop 3.7 Deen 2.1 -0,1 % Dirk 3.7 Dekamarkt 1.7 -0,1 % Hoogvliet-0,4 % 2.1 Jan Linders 1.1 35.7% +0,2 % 25.8% Plus 6.4 = Poisz 1.0 -0,3 % Spar 1.2 + 0,3 % = others 3.7 0 1.8 3.5 5.3 7 10.7% 6.8% Estimate private Label value share: 43% (including Aldi and Lidl) Turnover €38,3bn Sources: Nielsen/Distrifood/RABO/IPLC 2019 THE RETAILER BRAND IN THE NETHERLANDS Further consolidation of retail landscape ▸ Amazing growth of Jumbo: 4.9% to 21% market share in past 10 years ▸ Market share retailer brands: 27,3% (including discounters: 43%) ▸ Retail consolidation has intensified competition ▸ Professional players place private label and sustainability central in their strategy THE ALBERT HEIJN CASE Why addresssing sustainability is important Store image perception Retail brand Shopper loyalty Retail brand Retail brand choice quality perception purchase intention to the store Retail brand price perception Source: Price premium for food brands, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2014 THE ALBERT
    [Show full text]
  • Alblasserdam * 2015 Verplaatsing Dirk Van Den Broek Distributieve En
    Alblasserdam * 2015 Supermarktsector Distributieve en markttechnische achtergronden ALBLASSERDAM * 2015 VERPLAATSING DIRK VAN DEN BROEK DISTRIBUTIEVE EN MARKTTECHNISCHE ACHTERGRONDEN Conclusie Op dit moment zijn plannen in voorbereiding voor de versterking van de detailhandelsstructuur in Alblasserdam met het plan voor de verplaatsing en schaalvergroting van de Dirk van den Broek (voorheen Bas van der Heijden). De Dirk van den Broek zal worden gerealloceerd naar de Bochanenlocatie nabij de Plantageweg en worden vergroot naar 2.000 m² b.v.o. Met deze reallocatie wordt ingespeeld op de belangrijke (boven)lokale functie die deze supermarkt vervult in Alblasserdam. De distributieve mogelijkheden in Alblasserdam zijn in voldoende mate aanwezig voor deze versterking. Er zal dan ook geen winkelleegstand optreden in de dagelijkse winkelsector. Daarnaast resteert nog distributieve ruimte voor een verbeterslag bij andere supermarktaanbieders in Alblasserdam. Opmerkelijk is dat bijna alle supermarkten in de kern te klein zijn en kampen met ruimtelijke problemen op hun huidige locatie. Dit geldt met name voor de MCD en in mindere mate voor de Lidl en Coop. De distributieve ruimte biedt ook mogelijkheden voor andere plaatselijke aanbieders. Er zou een supermarkt-verbeterprogramma én een faseringsprogramma kunnen worden opgestart om de plaatselijke supermarktstructuur te verbeteren. In dit verbeterprogramma kan de verplaatsing van de plaatselijke buurtverzorgende MCD-supermarkt naar de Sportlaan goed passen. Ook zijn er voldoende kansen om de Sportlaan-locatie
    [Show full text]
  • The Abuse of Supermarket Buyers
    The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele, SOMO & Bob Young, Europe Economics On behalf of: AAI- Agribusiness Accountability Initiative Amsterdam, March 2009 Colophon The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele (SOMO) & Bob Young (Europe Economics) March 2009 Funding: This publication is made possible with funding from The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs via SOMO and DGOS (Belgian Directorate General for Development Cooperation) via Vredeseilanden (VECO). Published by: AAI - Agribusiness Action Initiatives, formerly called Agribusiness Accountability Initiative The authors can be contacted at: SOMO Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector 2 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................................3 Summary .........................................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 1. Abusive buyer power problems are being discussed in many fora while a comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • App Delivers Recipes Using Ingredients from Supermarkets' Daily Discounts
    Innovation > Retail > App delivers recipes using ingredients from supermarkets' daily discounts APP DELIVERS RECIPES USING INGREDIENTS FROM SUPERMARKETS' DAILY DISCOUNTS RETAIL The Netherlands' Koken met aanbiedingen app offers recipes made of ingredients that are on sale in major supermarkets that day. Cookbooks are great for getting recipe ideas, but fairly useless if they involve ingredients that aren’t within the family budget. Hellmann’s Brazil has already provided meal suggestions based on individuals’ shopping baskets. Now the Netherlands’ Koken met aanbiedingen app offers recipes made of ingredients that are on sale in major supermarkets that day. Much like other recipe apps, Koken met aanbiedingen features ingredients lists, instructions and photo galleries to guide users through preparation of a wide range of dishes. The app keeps track of the discounted items across Dutch stores including Albert Heijn, Dirk, Lidl, C1000, Jumbo, Aldi and Plus, and all of the available recipes include at least one item that’s currently on sale. The aim is to help households ensure they’re saving money every time they make a meal with a recipe taken from the app. It also includes a savings meter that shows them exactly how much money they’ve saved by using the app. Even if discounts on a particular product come to an end, all of the recipes are archived and can be bookmarked for later use. Koken met aanbiedingen is available for free on the App Store and Google Play. Are there other ways to tailor recipes to households individual needs? 14th July 2014 Email: [email protected] Website: www.kokenmetaanbiedingen.nl .
    [Show full text]
  • More Sustainable Food
    MORE SUSTAINABLE FOOD: FRUIT AND VEGETABLES AT THE SUPERMARKET Consumers, JULY 2018 Consumers Association More sustainable food: fruit and vegetables at the supermarket 1 CONTENT Resume 4 preface 6 1 study Design 7 1.1 Research questions 7 1.2 Definition / scope 8 1.2.1 Selection supermarkets 8 1.2.2 Selection of case studies 8 1.2.3 Scope of the study 9 1.2.4 Definition and explanation term sustainable 10 1.3 Research Methods 10 1.3.1 Research supermarket policy 10 1.3.2 Consumer research 12 1.3.3 Research case studies 12 2 Results 13 2.1 Sustainability initiatives fruits and vegetables incl. Marks 13 2.1.1 Sustainability labels fruit and vegetables 13 2.1.2 Sustainability Initiatives fruit and vegetables 17 2.1.3 Sustainability Themes 18 2.1.4 International perspective 22 2.2 Supermarket Policy sustainability fruit and vegetables 25 2.2.1 Purchasing Organization Fruit & Vegetables 25 2.2.2 Sustainability generally Fruit & Vegetables 27 2.2.3 Environment: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 32 2.2.4 Social: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 40 2.2.5 Training & Support 47 2.2.6 Seasonal Products 49 2.2.7 Food waste 50 2.2.8 Final questions: challenges and responsibilities of supermarkets 54 2.2.9 Summary of results by supermarket chain 55 2.3 consumer research 57 2.3.1 The concept of sustainability 57 2.3.2 Purchase of vegetables and fruits 58 2.3.3 Consumers sustainability in fruit and vegetables 59 2.4 Results of case studies 61 2.4.1 Strawberry 63 2.4.2 Banana 72 2.4.3 Paprika 82 2.4.4 Green Bean 89 Consumers
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Use by Dutch Supermarket Chains
    Social media use by Dutch supermarket chains A digital marketing analysis on brand loyalty Thomas Dijkman 11026057 August 21st, 2018 Supervisor: Dick Heinhuis 2nd Examiner: Tom van Engers Bachelor thesis Information Science Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam ABSTRACT Social media have grown from being entertaining communication platforms into powerful business tools for marketing, promotion and customer service. Consequently, businesses have had to make changes in their marketing strategies to take advantage of the opportunities created by this new social ecosystem. Brand loyalty, which is one of the main goals of marketing efforts, is influenced by social media through different factors like trust and feelings of community. This thesis assesses the efforts made by Dutch supermarket chains on social media to test the effect of social media on their perceived brand loyalty. The factors that stimulate brand loyalty that were found in an extensive literature review were challenged through field research to test their effect on Dutch supermarket brands. The findings of this research show that there is no significant effect of social media efforts on brand loyalty in the case of Dutch supermarket chains. On the contrary, present research confirms that there are unexplored opportunities for Dutch supermarket chains to use social media to increase brand loyalty. From these findings, a general discussion and conclusion are offered, as well as directions for further research. 2 Table of contents 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1.1 Research objectives……………………………………………………………………………………… 6 1.2 Relevance……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2.1 Academic relevance………………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2.2 Managerial relevance…………………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.3 Research question and subquestions………………………………………………………………. 8 1.4 The Dutch supermarket industry…………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Van Lin
    Tilburg University Grocery retail dynamics and store choice van Lin, Arjen Publication date: 2014 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): van Lin, A. (2014). Grocery retail dynamics and store choice. CentER, Center for Economic Research. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. sep. 2021 Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Arjen van Lin Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op woensdag 18 juni 2014 om 16.15 uur door Arjen Ignatius Johan Gerard van Lin geboren op 21 mei 1986 te Haelen.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012-2013
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012-2013 1 Halle, 20 June 2013 Limited liability company Etn. Fr. Colruyt FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013 Headquarters: ANNUAL REPORT Wilgenveld Presented to the Ordinary General Edingensesteenweg 196 Assembly B- 1500 HALLE on 25 September 2013 RPR Brussels by the BOARD OF DIRECTORS VAT number: BE 400.378.485 and AUDITOR’S REPORT Enterprise number: 0400.378.485 Tel. +32 (2) 360 10 40 Ce rapport annuel est également Fax. + 32 (2) 360 02 07 disponible en français. Internet: www.colruyt.be – Dit jaarverslag is ook verkrijgbaar in het www.colruytgroup.com Nederlands E-mail: [email protected] Risks relating to forecasts Statements by the Colruyt Group included in this publication, along with references to this publication in other written or verbal statements of the group which refer to future expectations with regard to activities, events and strategic developments of the Colruyt Group, are predictions and as such contain risks and uncertainties. The information communicated relates to information available at the present time, which can differ from the final results. Factors that can cause any variation between expectations and reality are: changes in the microeconomic or macroeconomic context, changing market situations, changing competitive climate, unfavourable decisions with regard to the building and/or expansion of new or existing stores, procurement problems with suppliers, as well as other factors that can have an impact on the group’s result. Colruyt Group does not enter into any obligation with respect to future reporting that might have an influence on the group’s result or which could bring about a deviation from the forecasts included in this publication or in other group communications, whether written or oral.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Market Exposure to Deforestation in Brazil
    DUTCH MARKET EXPOSURE TO DEFORESTATION IN BRAZIL Top four supermarkets Dutch imports of soy from Brazil (annual) 1 3,800,000 2 TONNES 3 % of overall soy imports to 4 The Netherlands from Brazil 55% Exports of soy from the Cerrado and Amazon biomes to The Netherlands (tonnes/% total) CERRADO 1,700,000 | 45% AMAZON 600,772 | 16% OTHER Supermarket exposure to soy companies named in Mighty Earth’s Soy and Cattle Deforestation Tracker SOY EXPORTS BRAZIL TO THE NETHERLANDS (TONNES) 787,901 427,722 327,091 310,685 267, 510 MARKET SHARE 20% 11% 9% 8% 7% OVERALL SCORE ON TRACKER (/100) 56 47 64 31 25 Note: market share, Kantar (2020). % overall soy imports, COMTRADE (2019). All other data TRASE (www.trase.earth) (2018). Analysis of data and interviews with experts suggests that export and import markets are relatively ‘sticky’, meaning that market shares are unlikely to shift significantly year-on-year due to fixed infrastructure. Therefore, historical trends allow a projection of current market share and exposure of supermarkets to companies in their supply chain. Overall score of companies in the Tracker assessed against total linked cases; total clearance; possible illegal clearance; responsiveness to cases; resolution of cases; and transparency. https://www.mightyearth.org/soy-and-cattle-tracker/ DUTCH SUPERMARKETS EXPOSED TO THE POOREST PERFORMERS ON MIGHTY EARTH’S TRACKER Dutch supermarkets are exposed to deforestation risk due to links to poor performers in Mighty Earth’s Rapid Response Soy & Cattle Deforestation Tracker – including the worst performing soy traders Cargill and Bunge. These companies are linked to the largest amounts of land conversion respectively 61,260 and 38,976 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Prijspeiling Biologische Producten
    PRIJSPEILING BIOLOGISCHE PRODUCTEN HET VERHAAL ACHTER DE PRIJS BOOMING BIO Van de uitgaven aan voeding in Nederland gaat zo’n 4% naar biolo- gische producten. In het eerste kwartaal van 2016 schakelden 108 boeren over op bio; meer dan in heel 2015. Bijna alle grote supermarkten breiden hun assortiment voortdurend uit. Albert Heijn en Jumbo hebben samen binnen de supermarkten 60% marktaandeel. Nederland loopt SUPERMARKT met die 4% niet op kop. In 2014 was dit nog 3% en in Denemarken al VERSLAAT 8%, gevolgd door Zwitserland met 7% en Oostenrijk met ongeveer 6%. EKOWINKEL In Duitsland had biologisch een marktaandeel van 3 à 4% en bij onze zuiderburen 2%. 84 CONSUMENTENGIDS JULI/AUGUSTUS 2016 TEKST HENK VERHAGEN, FERRY PLOEG Biologische voeding is beter voor milieu en dier, maar niet voor de portemonnee. Waarom kosten ­­ We vergeleken bio-producten zo veel meer dan reguliere? 2800 prijzen van En waar ben je het voordeligst uit? 150 verschillende producten” De tijd dat natuurvoeding het imago Super of ekowinkel? had van geitenwollen sokken en Half april peilden wij de prijzen van wormstekige appeltjes is voorbij. biologische producten bij natuur- Prijspeiling Biologisch is trendy en salonfähig. voedingswinkels en 11 supermarkt- biologische producten Boerenmarkten schieten als pad- ketens. Uiteindelijk bleken er ruim denstoelen uit de grond en bij spe- 150 producten voldoende verkrijg- 14% ciaalzaken lonken de schappen met baar te zijn om met elkaar te kunnen duizenden biologische producten. vergelijken. De natuurvoedingswin- Dirk Ook grootgrutters als Albert Heijn kels zijn Ekoplaza, Marqt (deels bio- 12% en Jumbo breiden hun biologische logisch), Estafette en Natuur winkel.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Greenwashing at Dutch Supermarkets
    Potential greenwashing at Dutch Supermarkets (RetailTrends, 2016) Name: Thibaut Marie Tardieu Student number: 960429823080 Study: Business and Consumer studies (BBC) Date: 05-11-2020 Supervisor: Anne Brouwer Second reader: Frans Verhees Course code: YSS-81812 ECTS: 12 Abstract Sustainability plays an increasingly important role in the lives of Dutch consumers. Supermarkets are at the end of the supply chain and play an important role in greening the market. They are increasingly communicating sustainability actions through their corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. However, on various occasions Dutch supermarkets have been accused of greenwashing: a combination of poor sustainability performance and communicating positively about sustainability. The major problem with greenwashing in this industry is that it could create a concerning status quo regarding true sustainability at Dutch supermarkets. Furthermore, the large amount of information available to consumers makes it difficult to distinguish between deceptive and truthful information communicated by supermarkets, creating the risk of confusion. To analyse Dutch supermarkets and how they respond to greenwashing accusations, their sustainability actions and communications. They are examined from different perspectives: the supermarket, the consumer, and society organisations. CSR reports from 2017–2019 are analysed for three supermarkets (Albert Heijn, PLUS, and Aldi) according to six dimensions: environment, animal welfare, packaging, food miles, health, and food waste. The Sustainable Brand Index™ for 2017– 2019 is used for the consumer sustainability perspective of these three supermarkets. Publications from society organisations that made it into popular media in the same time period are used to investigate whether any of the three supermarkets have been accused of greenwashing, and what the impact of these accusations was on supermarkets’ behaviour and on consumers’ sustainability perception of the supermarkets.
    [Show full text]