Introduction to Russian Thought: Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Russian Thought: Fyodor Dostoyevsky Introduction to Russian Thought: Fyodor Dostoyevsky An exploration of the literary, philosophical and cultural legacy of Fyodor Dostoevsky through The Brothers Karamazov. We will enjoy the literary mastery of Dostoevsky’s last novel, considered by many a masterpiece of world literature, while relying on topics and themes in the novel to discuss the problem of evil, the psychology of human mind, the limits of rationalism, the concept of religious faith in the world of injustice and suffering, and other “eternal the.” The best text to read is the original Russian; we will be using English translations and our discussions will be conducted in English. Those who are able to read in Russian are encouraged to do so. Instructor: Dr. Konstantin Starikov Dr. Starikov is an academic librarian and instructor of Russian at Boston University. A poet and an independent scholar, Dr. Starikov did his graduate work in Slavic Studies and Literature at Brown, Yale, and the University of Chicago. He is a recipient of Dr. Pranas A. Sveikauskas Award in Recognition of an Outstanding Dissertation The Poetic Riddle in Eighteenth-Century Russia (2016). Readings: The Brothers Karamazov / Братья Карамазовы During our seminar meetings, you will be given page references to the English editions listed below. However, you are welcome to use other editions of the three translations or another translation. Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Brothers Karamazov. Trans. Constance Garnett (1999) Fyodor Dostoyevsky. The Brothers Karamazov. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. Farrar, Straus and Giroux edition. (2002) Fyodor Dostoyevsky. The Brothers Karamazov. Trans. Susan McReynolds. Norton Critical. Second edition. (2011) You are also encouraged to explore other texts by Dostoyevsky, about Dostoyevsky’s major fiction and non-fiction, as well as critical interpretations of Dostoyevsky’s work. Selected bibliography will guide you in supplementary readings. Seminar Schedule All Class Meetings are from 6:30pm-8:00pm First Session: Tuesday, February 5th Introduction: Why read Dostoyevsky? Second Session: Father and Sons Tuesday, February 12th Books One, Two, Three and Four Third Session: Problems of good and evil Tuesday, February 19th Books Five, Six and Seven Fourth Session: The significance of suffering Tuesday, February 26th Books Eight, Nine, Ten Fifth Session: What is justice? Tuesday, March 5th Books Eleven, Twelve Sixth Session: Responsibility and active love Tuesday March 12th the Epilogue, and summation NO MEETING, SPRING BREAK Tuesday March 19th Seventh Session: Visualizing humanity Tuesday March 26th Movie and other adaptations of The Brothers Karamazov Eighth Session: Tuesday April 2nd Conclusion: What is the purpose of reading The Brothers Karamazov in the 21st century? Ground Rules for Discussion The goal of ground rules is to establish a friendly and intellectually stimulating environment to ensure that discussions help participants work together toward greater understanding and that each participant is heard. Be respectful of each other • Arrive on time • Turn your cell phone off • Listen actively and attentively, do not engage in private conversations while others are speaking. • Do not interrupt one another. • Challenge one another, but do so respectfully. • Critique ideas, not people. • Avoid put-downs (even humorous ones), blame, speculation, inflammatory language. • Do not monopolize discussion. • Build on one another’s comments; work toward shared understanding. • Consider anything that is said in class strictly confidential. Be open-minded, curious and respectful of yourself • Take responsibility for the quality of the discussion. • Speak from your own experience, without generalizing. • If you are offended by anything said during discussion, acknowledge it immediately. • Speak your discomfort. If something is bothering you, please share this with the group. Often our emotional reactions to this process offer the most valuable learning opportunities. • Ask for clarification if you are confused and/or in disagreement. • Do not offer opinions without supporting evidence. • You are not expected to agree with or to convince others. Rather, the higher goal of learning is to examine different points of view and opinions. About the instructor: Konstantin Starikov (Ph.D. Brown University, M.Phil. Yale University, MA The University of Chicago, MLS Simmons College, BA Boston University) Dr. Konstantin Starikov is librarian and part-time instructor of Russian at Boston University. He is a recipient of Dr. Pranas A. Sveikauskas Award in Recognition of an Outstanding Dissertation The Poetic Riddle in Eighteenth-Century Russia (2016). A poet and independent scholar, Konstantin is active in local Russian-speaking cultural events of Greater Boston. He enjoys learning foreign languages, reading, and travelling. Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) (also spelled Dostoevsky, Dostoevskii) “Russian novelist and short-story writer whose psychological penetration into the darkest recesses of the human heart, together with his unsurpassed moments of illumination, had an immense influence on 20th-century fiction. Dostoyevsky is usually regarded as one of the finest novelists who ever lived. Literary modernism, existentialism, and various schools of psychology, theology, and literary criticism have been profoundly shaped by his ideas. His works are often called prophetic because he so accurately predicted how Russia’s revolutionaries would behave if they came to power. In his time he was also renowned for his activity as a journalist.” Gary Saul Morson, “Fyodor Dostoyevsky: Biography, Books, Philosophy, & Facts.” Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky. Accessed 28 Dec. 2018. “Dostoevsky, the only psychologist, incidentally, from whom I had something to learn; he ranks among the most beautiful strokes of fortune in my life, even more than my discovery of Stendhal.” Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols. (trans. Walter Kaufman and R.J. Hollingdale; London, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985). "Freud's essay ‘Dostoevsky and Parricide’ was published in 1928 as an introduction to a German collection of materials on The Brothers Karamazov. This was a highly appropriate place of publication since both the essay and the novel dealt with parricide and epilepsy. Sixty years have passed since then but Freud's essay is still useful, filled with brilliant insights that have proved quite influential, even among those scholars who do not accept his theory about the nature of Dostoevsky's epilepsy. Freud's achievement was to bring together, to unify and illuminate as no one had done before him, the most diverse strands in Dostoevsky's life and works: relations between father and son, Dostoevsky's epilepsy, his political and religious views, his gambling, and his obsession with crime and moral responsibility. Were it not for Freud, we would still be examining each of these strands separately, unable to see how they are all interwoven." Nathan Rossen, “Freud on Dostoevsky’s Epilepsy: A Revaluaiton.” Dostoyevsky Studies 9 (1988): 107-25 “The kernel of Camus’s affinity with Dostoevskii brings us to the fiercely combative, atheistic spirit of Ivan Karamazov. ‘If God is dead, then all is permitted’ rings through all Ivan’s thinking, which leads Camus to tussle, like the Russian character, with the logic of totalitarian atheism. Camus emerges towards some form of humanism while Ivan slides into insanity. But, Ivan remains with Camus to the end of his days. He proved for Camus the most attractive, fascinating of all Dostoevskii’s characters. The facts are eloquent enough in themselves. Not only did Camus direct the theatrical adaptation of The Brothers Karamazov in March 1938, in Algiers, for the Théâtre de l’Équipe, but also and most significantly, he chose to play the part of Ivan, as opposed to that of the other brothers, the sensual, earthy Dimitry, and the spiritually-minded, non-earthly Alyosha, psychological dynamos in themselves.” Ronald Batchelor, “Dostoevskii’s Ivan Karamazov: Inspiration to Albert Camus.” FifteenEightyFour | Cambridge University Press, 27 Mar. 2014, http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2014/03/dostoevksiis-ivan- karamazov-inspiration-to-albert-camus/ Chronology of Dostoevsky’s Life and Works: Dates are given according to the Julian calendar (or Old Style), which was retained in Russia until the 1917 Revolution and ran twelve days behind the Gregorian calendar. 1821 Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky is born in Moscow on October 30 in Hospital for the poor, the second of seven children. 1831-37 Fyodor and his older brother, Mikhail (b. 1820), together attend boarding schools in Moscow. Following the death of their mother in 1837, they are sent to a preparatory school in St. Petersburg. 1838 Fyodor, but not Mikhail, is admitted to St. Petersburg’s Academy of Military Engineers. 1839 Father possibly murdered by his own serfs at his estate, Chermashnya, in province of Tula. 1843 Dostoevsky graduates from the Academy as lieutenant. Translates into Russian Honore de Balzac’s Eugenie Grandet. 1844 He translates George Sand’s La derniere Aldini and works on Poor Folk, his own first novel. 1845 Friendship with the liberal Vissarion Grigorievich Belinsky, Russia’s most influential critic. 1846 Publication of Poor Folk, The Double (appearing two weeks later), and Mr. Prokharchin. Acquaintance with the utopian socialist M. V. Butashevich-Petrashevsky 1846 Anna Grigorievna Snitkina (Dostoevsky’s future wife) is born in Petersburg on October 30th.
Recommended publications
  • Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy
    Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor Dorothy J. Hale Spring 2016 Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy © 2016 By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Abstract Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy by Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation focuses new critical attention on a problem central to the history and theory of the novel, but so far remarkably underexplored: the mimetic illusion that realist characters exist independently from the author’s control, and even from the constraints of form itself. How is this illusion of “life” produced? What conditions maintain it, and at what points does it start to falter? My study investigates the character-systems of three Russian realist novels with widely differing narrative structures — Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1865–1869), and Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent (1875) and The Brothers Karamazov (1879–1880) — that offer rich ground for exploring the sources and limits of mimetic illusion. I suggest, moreover, that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky themselves were preoccupied with this question. Their novels take shape around ambitious projects of characterization that carry them toward the edges of the realist tradition, where the novel begins to give way to other forms of art and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Dostoevsky's Ideal
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2015 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul A. Eppler Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Philosophy Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Eppler, Paul A., "Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man" (2015). Student Publications. 395. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/395 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 395 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Abstract This paper aimed to provide a comprehensive examination of the "ideal" Dostoevsky human being. Through comparison of various characters and concepts found in his texts, a kenotic individual, one who is undifferentiated in their love for all of God's creation, was found to be the ultimate to which Dostoevsky believed man could ascend. Keywords Dostoevsky, Christianity, Kenoticism Disciplines Philosophy Comments This paper was written for Professor Vernon Cisney's course, PHIL 368: Reading- Dostoevsky, Fall 2015. This student research paper is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/395 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul Eppler Professor Vernon Cisney Reading Dostoevsky I affirm that I have upheld the highest principles of honesty and integrity in my academic work and have not witnessed a violation of the Honor Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzschean Types in the Brothers Karamazov ​ 139817 –Dr
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Patrick Durkin Nietzschean Types in The Brothers Karamazov ​ 139817 –Dr. William Angus th 11 ​ February 2019 ​ For the Masters of Arts, English Durkin 1 Abstract Nietzsche and Dostoevsky were contemporaries, and Nietzsche especially was known to admire Dostoevsky’s work. Both authors were interested in the study of the basis for human morality, and the search for a redirection of human morality; one in which the problems they saw with the current understanding of acceptable behaviour according to laws, religion and might is right, could be melded in with their own beliefs and struggles with their own mortality and morality. Although Nietzsche’s collection of essays The Genealogy of Morals, (1887) was ​ ​ written 7 years after Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov (1880), it is interesting to ​ ​ note that the main character types that Nietzsche believed created hierarchies that developed and sustained the morality of his time, appear in the form of the main characters in The Brothers Karamazov. ​ ​ This thesis will be looking at the The Brothers Karamazov through the different ​ ​ character ‘types’ and the resulting psychomachia of the three legitimate brothers, the older brothers Dmitri and Ivan, and especially that of Alyosha, the youngest brother. The thesis will focus on both elder brothers’ evolution of thought and action through the progress of the novel, and, importantly, on each brothers’ interactions with Alyosha and the turbulent state of mind they regularly leave their younger sibling in.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Beckett and Fyodor Dostoevsky
    Metaphysical Comedy: Samuel Beckett and Fyodor Dostoevsky PhD English Literature Ekaterina Gosteva May 2019 I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the connection between Beckett’s comedy and Dostoevsky’s novels in the light of René Girard’s theory of metaphysical desire. While focusing on Beckett’s prose of the 1930s, this study begins with the typology of laughter in Watt. ​ ​ With the help of this passage (employed as a critical tool), the subject of Beckett’s comedy is preliminarily defined as ‘The Unhappy Consciousness’. In Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, this term is stated with regards to the functions of laughter ​ as a negative response to a threat from a hostile phenomenal world. ‘The risus purus’, which Beckett celebrates as ‘the laugh of laughs’, reveals itself as a satirical attack at Kant’s rational cosmology and Hegel’s phenomenology. A further investigation into this structure provides a link between the genre of comedy in general, Beckett’s comic form and Girard’s theory of mimetic desire, based on the works of Cervantes, Flaubert, Stendhal, Proust and Dostoevsky. The works of these novelists allowed René Girard to articulate a concrete theorization of desire, which binds together literary and anthropological questions. Beckett’s engagement with Dostoevsky remains a blind spot in Beckett studies. Although as early as Proust, Beckett attempted to link Proust and Dostoevsky as the ​ ​ writers whose technique he defined as ‘negative and comic’, the scarcity of his critical comments on Dostoevsky has been an obstacle for scholars trying to identify and analyse their relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • By Fyodor Dostoevsky
    “The Problem of Evil ” by Fyodor Dostoevsky Dostoevsky, (detail) portrait by Vasily Perov, The State Tretyakov Gallery About the author.. The novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881) spent four years in a Siberian prison and four more years in the army as punish- ment for his role in a clandestine Utopian-socialist discussion group. He became scornful of the rise of humanistic science in the West and chron- icled its threat to human freedom. Dostoevsky’s writings challenged the notion of the essential rationality of human beings and anticipated many ideas in existential psychoanalysis. For Dostoevsky, the essence of being human is freedom. About the work. In the The Brothers Karamazov,1 Dostoevsky reveals deep psychological insight into the nature of human morality. In this, his greatest work, he expresses the destructive aspects of human freedom which can only be bound by God. In Chapter 4 of that work, the death of an innocent child is seen to be an inescapable objection to God’s good- ness. In this chapter Alyosha is the religious foil to Ivan, his intellectual older brother. 1. Fyodor Dostoevsky. “Rebellion” in the The Brothers Karamazov (1879). Trans. by Constance Garnett. 1 “The Problem of Evil ” by Fyodor Dostoevsky From the reading. “But then there is the children, and what am I to do about them? That’s a question I can’t answer.” Ideas of Interest from The Brothers Karamazov 1. Why does Ivan think that children are innocent and adults are not? Why does he think we can love children when they are close, but we can only love our neighbor abstractly? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Inquisitor,” Is Told by Ivan Karamazov to His Younger Brother Alyosha
    Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881), author of such works as Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, and The Possessed, is considered by many to be one of the world’s greatest writers, and the novel The Brothers Karamazov is universally recognized to be one of genuine masterpieces of world literature. Within this novel the story, “The Grand Inquisitor,” is told by Ivan Karamazov to his younger brother Alyosha. The two brothers had just been discussing the problem of evil—the classic problem of Christian theology: if God is really all powerful, all knowing, and truly loving, then why does evil exist? If God could not have prevented evil, then he is not all powerful. If evil somehow escapes his awareness, then he is not all knowing. If he knew, and could do something about it, but chose not to, then how can he be considered a loving God? One solution to this problem is to claim that evil does not really exist, that if we were to see the world Portrait of Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1872 from God’s perspective, from the perspective of eternity, then everything comes out well in the end. Another response is to claim that it really isn’t God’s fault at all, it is ours. God gave us free-will and evil is the result of our misuse of that gift. Ivan will have none of these arguments. He brings up the particularly troubling case of the suffering of innocent children—how can they be blamed and punished if they are innocent? Ivan cannot accept that the suffering of an innocent child will be justified in the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Socially Constructed Reality and Meaning in Notes from Underground
    Socially Constructed Reality and Meaning in Notes from Underground Just as the hands in M.C. Escher’s “Drawing Hands” both create and are created by each other, the identity of man and society are mutually interdependent. According to the model described in The Sacred Canopy, Peter Berger believes that man externalizes or creates a social reality that is in turn objectified, or accepted by him as real. This sociological model creates a useful framework for understanding the narrator’s rejection of ultimate reality or truth in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground. The reality in which the narrator tries to live in part II, and the reality that he rejects in part I, are both created and, as such, are ultimately meaningless. The underground man’s refusal to objectify social reality causes a feeling of meaninglessness and raises a fundamental question of purpose that confronts people of all dispositions. Berger’s theory is based on a dialectical relationship between man and society. To explain his theory he defines three terms. “Externalization is the ongoing outpouring of human being into the world. Objectivation, the attainment by the products of this activity of a reality that confronts its original producers as a facticity external to and other than themselves. Internalization is the reappropriation by men of this same reality, transforming into structures of the subjective consciousness,” (Berger 4). He believes that society is a wholly human invention created by man’s tendency to externalize. This created entity is then objectified by man, giving society and its features the appearance of true reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William
    The Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William Leatherbarrow, Oxford University Press, 2008, 0199536392, 9780199536399, 658 pages. The Idiot (1868), written under the appalling personal circumstances Dostoevsky endured while travelling in Europe, not only reveals the author's acute artistic sense and penetrating psychological insight, but also affords his most powerful indictment of a Russia struggling to emulate contemporary Europe while sinking under the weight of Western materialism. It is the portrait of nineteenth-century Russian society in which a "positively good man" clashes with the emptiness of a society that cannot accommodate his moral idealism. Meticulously faithful to the original, this new translation includes explanatory notes and a critical introduction by W.J. Leatherbarrow. About the Series: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the broadest spectrum of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, voluminous notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.. DOWNLOAD HERE Dostoevsky's The Idiot A Critical Companion, Liza Knapp, 1998, Literary Criticism, 274 pages. This book is designed to guide readers through Dostoevsky's The Idiot, first published in 1869 and generally considered to be his most mysterious and confusing work. The volume .... Persuasion , Jane Austen, 1947, English fiction, 254 pages. The House of the Dead and Poor Folk , Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 2004, Fiction, 446 pages. In "The House of the Dead, Dostoevsky give vent to his perceptions of prison life, writing from his grueling experience in a Siberian camp, and introduces a gallery of boastful ...
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment
    Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment You may find the following chronology, with links, of use in guiding your study of Dostoevsky’s novel F. M. Dostoevsky -- Chronology through 1866 1821 3 October, born, Moscow. Father -- Mikhail, doctor (son of priest), who had risen through service to acquire noble status; mother of merchant stock. Former Mariinskii Hospital for the Poor, Moscow, where FMD’s father worked as a doctor, at the time of FMD’s birth. 1825 [Death of Alexander I; accession of Nicholas I; Decembrist revolt.] 1826 [Death of Karamzin (born 1766), author of "Poor Liza" («Бедная Лиза», 1792), History of the Russian State (1818-26).] 1830 [Aleksandr Pushkin's Tales of Belkin, «Повести Белкина».] 1831 Dostoevskii family buys small estate at Darovoe, 150 miles from Moscow. 1833 FMD goes away to school. 1834 [Pushkin's "Queen of Spades", «Пиковая дама».] 1836 Death of mother. [Nikolai Gogol' (1809-52) publishes "The Nose", «Нос»] 1837 FMD goes to St Petersburg, enters Academy of Engineers, housed in the Mik- hailovskii Castle. [Death of Pushkin (born 1799), after a duel, partly as the result of a malicious conspiracy.] 1839 Death of father, possibly murdered. 1841 Promoted to ensign. Plans romantic tragedies. [Death of Mikhail Lermontov (born 1814).] 1842 [Gogol' publishes first part of Dead Souls («Мертвые души»), and "The Over- coat" («Шинель»).] 1844 First published work: a translation of Balzac's Eugénie Grandet. Work on Poor Folk. 1845 Completes Poor Folk («Бедные люди»), which is greeted ecstatically (prior to publication) by Nikolai Nekrasov (1821-1877), Dmitrii Grigorovich (1822-1900), and Vissarion Belinskii (1811-1848), leaders of liberal thought and writing, whose enthusiasm guarantees FMD popularity in their literary circles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky Free
    FREE THE BEST SHORT STORIES OF DOSTOEVSKY PDF F. M. Dostoevsky,David Magarshack | 400 pages | 22 Mar 2001 | Random House USA Inc | 9780375756887 | English | New York, United States These Short Fan Fictions Put You In The Story Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky was born in Moscow in This post lists the Best Fyodor Dostoyevsky Novels and short stories. The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky debut, the epistolary novella Poor Folkmade his name. From this experience came The House of the Dead In he began the journal Vremya Time. Already married, he fell in love with one of his contributors, Appollinaria Suslova, eighteen years his junior, and developed a ruinous passion for roulette. After the death of his first wife, Maria, inDostoyevsky completed Notes from Underground and began work towards Crime and Punishment He died in Raskolnikov, a destitute and desperate former student, wanders through the slums of St Petersburg and commits a random murder without remorse or regret. Raskolnikov imagines himself to be a great man, a Napoleon: acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. But as he embarks on a dangerous game of cat and mouse with a suspicious police investigator, Raskolnikov is pursued by the growing voice of his conscience and finds the noose of his own guilt tightening around his neck. While his literary reputation rests mainly on such celebrated novels as Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, and The Idiot, Dostoyevsky also wrote much superb short fiction. The Double is one of the finest of his shorter works. It appeared in his second published work and is by far the most significant of his early stories, not least for its successful, straight-faced treatment of a hallucinatory theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Folk and Other Stories: Poor Folk; the Landlady; Mr Prokharchin; Polzunkov Ebook
    FREEPOOR FOLK AND OTHER STORIES: POOR FOLK; THE LANDLADY; MR PROKHARCHIN; POLZUNKOV EBOOK F. M. Dostoevsky,David McDuff | 288 pages | 04 Apr 1989 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140445053 | English | London, United Kingdom The Dostoyevsky Heroines Poor Folk and Other Stories. ebook ∣ The Landlady, Mr. Prokhartchin, Polzunkov & The Honest Thief by one of the greatest Russian writers. Inspired by a true story, it depicts the miserly life of the protagonist, Mr. Prokharchin, a patronym derived from the Russian word for 'grub' or 'vittles', kharchi. He seems to be extremely poor, eating frugal meals and sleeping on a mattress directly on the floor. His landlady and the other tenants feel sorry for him. In The Landlady Dostoyevsky portrays a dreamer hero who is captivated by a Mr Prokharchin, inspired by a true story, is a sly comedy centring on an eccentric miser, and Polzunkov is a powerful character sketch which, in common with the other This item:Poor Folk and Other Stories by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Paperback . Mr. Prokharchin Poor Folk, the author's first great literary triumph, is the story of a tragic In The Landlady Dostoyevsky portrays a dreamer hero who is captivated by a Mr Prokharchin, inspired by a true story, is a sly comedy centring on an eccentric miser, and Polzunkov is a powerful character sketch which, in common with the other. Poor Folk, the author's first great literary triumph, is the story of a tragic relationship between an impoverished copy clerk and a young seamstress, told through their passionate letters to each other. In The Landlady Dostoyevsky portrays a dreamer hero who is captivated by a curious couple and becomes their lodger.
    [Show full text]