Volcanic Hazards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geologic Map of the Long Valley Caldera, Mono-Inyo Craters
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-1933 US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF LONG VALLEY CALDERA, MONO-INYO CRATERS VOLCANIC CHAIN, AND VICINITY, EASTERN CALIFORNIA By Roy A. Bailey GEOLOGIC SETTING VOLCANISM Long Valley caldera and the Mono-Inyo Craters Long Valley caldera volcanic chain compose a late Tertiary to Quaternary Volcanism in the Long Valley area (Bailey and others, volcanic complex on the west edge of the Basin and 1976; Bailey, 1982b) began about 3.6 Ma with Range Province at the base of the Sierra Nevada frontal widespread eruption of trachybasaltic-trachyandesitic fault escarpment. The caldera, an east-west-elongate, lavas on a moderately well dissected upland surface oval depression 17 by 32 km, is located just northwest (Huber, 1981).Erosional remnants of these mafic lavas of the northern end of the Owens Valley rift and forms are scattered over a 4,000-km2 area extending from the a reentrant or offset in the Sierran escarpment, Adobe Hills (5-10 km notheast of the map area), commonly referred to as the "Mammoth embayment.'? around the periphery of Long Valley caldera, and The Mono-Inyo Craters volcanic chain forms a north- southwestward into the High Sierra. Although these trending zone of volcanic vents extending 45 km from lavas never formed a continuous cover over this region, the west moat of the caldera to Mono Lake. The their wide distribution suggests an extensive mantle prevolcanic basement in the area is mainly Mesozoic source for these initial mafic eruptions. Between 3.0 granitic rock of the Sierra Nevada batholith and and 2.5 Ma quartz-latite domes and flows erupted near Paleozoic metasedimentary and Mesozoic metavolcanic the north and northwest rims of the present caldera, at rocks of the Mount Morrisen, Gull Lake, and Ritter and near Bald Mountain and on San Joaquin Ridge Range roof pendants (map A). -
Satellite Observations of Fumarole Activity at Aluto Volcano, Ethiopia: Implications for Geothermal Monitoring and Volcanic Hazard
Accepted Manuscript Satellite observations of fumarole activity at Aluto volcano, Ethiopia: Implications for geothermal monitoring and volcanic hazard Mathilde Braddock, Juliet Biggs, Iain M. Watson, William Hutchison, David M. Pyle, Tamsin A. Mather PII: S0377-0273(17)30118-X DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.05.006 Reference: VOLGEO 6091 To appear in: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research Received date: 24 February 2017 Revised date: 6 May 2017 Accepted date: 7 May 2017 Please cite this article as: Mathilde Braddock, Juliet Biggs, Iain M. Watson, William Hutchison, David M. Pyle, Tamsin A. Mather , Satellite observations of fumarole activity at Aluto volcano, Ethiopia: Implications for geothermal monitoring and volcanic hazard, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.jvolgeores.2017.05.006 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Satellite observations of fumarole activity at Aluto volcano, Ethiopia: implications for geothermal monitoring and volcanic hazard Mathilde Braddock1*, Juliet Biggs2, Iain M. Watson2, William Hutchison3, David M. Pyle4 and Tamsin A. Mather4 1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2 COMET, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 3 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. -
Geothermal Springs, Geysers and Fumaroles
Sciences Secondary volcanic activities: Geothermal springs, Geysers and Fumaroles Geothermal Springs A geothermal (or hydrothermal) spring is produced by the emergence of geothermally heated groundwater from the Earth's crust. There are geothermal springs in many locations all over the crust of the earth. Geothermal Springs Surface water percolates downward through the rocks below the Earth's surface to high-temperature regions surrounding a magma chamber, either active or recently solidified but still hot. When the water is heated, becomes less dense, and rises Surface water back to the surface along fissures and cracks. Sometimes these features are called "dying volcanoes" because they seem to represent the last stage of volcanic activity as the magma, in depth, cools and hardens. Water percolation Heated water rises up The temperature of hot springs depends on factors such as: •the rate at which water circulates through the underground channels Hot rocks •the amount of heat at depth •the dilution of the heated water by cool ground water near the surface. Geothermal Springs The water issuing from a hot spring is heated by geothermal heat from the Earth's astenosphere. In general, the temperature of rocks increases with depth. The rate of temperature increase is known as the geothermal gradient (it is about 25°C per km). If water percolates deeply enough into the crust, it will be heated as it comes into contact with hot rocks. Warm springs are sometimes the result of hot and cold springs mixing but may also occur outside of volcanic areas. Geysers Geyser are located near active volcanic areas, and the geyser effect is due to the proximity of magma. -
Tsunami Hazard Related to a Flank Collapse of Anak Krakatau Volcano
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on January 2, 2019 Tsunami hazard related to a flank collapse of Anak Krakatau Volcano, Sunda Strait, Indonesia T. GIACHETTI1,3*, R. PARIS2,4,6, K. KELFOUN2,4,6 & B. ONTOWIRJO5 1Clermont Universite´, Universite´ Blaise Pascal, Geolab, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France 2Clermont Universite´, Universite´ Blaise Pascal, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France 3CNRS, UMR 6042, Geolab, F-63057 Clermont-Ferrand, France 4CNRS, UMR 6524, LMV, F-63038 Clermont-Ferrand, France 5Coastal Dynamics Research Center, BPDP-BPPT, 11th Floor, Building 2, BPPT, Jl, M. H. Thamrin no 8, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia 6IRD, R 163, LMV, F-63038 Clermont-Ferrand, France *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Numerical modelling of a rapid, partial destabilization of Anak Krakatau Volcano (Indonesia) was performed in order to investigate the tsunami triggered by this event. Anak Krakatau, which is largely built on the steep NE wall of the 1883 Krakatau eruption caldera, is active on its SW side (towards the 1883 caldera), which makes the edifice quite unstable. A hypothetical 0.280 km3 flank collapse directed southwestwards would trigger an initial wave 43 m in height that would reach the islands of Sertung, Panjang and Rakata in less than 1 min, with amplitudes from 15 to 30 m. These waves would be potentially dangerous for the many small tourist boats circulating in, and around, the Krakatau Archipelago. The waves would then propagate in a radial manner from the impact region and across the Sunda Strait, at an average speed of 80–110 km h21. -
Insights from Fumarole Gas Geochemistry on the Recent Volcanic Unrest of Pico Do Fogo, Cape Verde
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 15 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.631190 Insights from Fumarole Gas Geochemistry on the Recent Volcanic Unrest of Pico do Fogo, Cape Verde Gladys V. Melián 1,2,3*, Pedro A. Hernández 1,2,3, Nemesio M. Pérez 1,2,3, María Asensio-Ramos 1, Eleazar Padrón 1,2,3, Mar Alonso 1,2, Germán D. Padilla 1,2, José Barrancos 1,2, Francesco Sortino 4, Hirochicka Sumino 5, Fátima Rodríguez 1, Cecilia Amonte 1, Sonia Silva 6, Nadir Cardoso 6 and José M. Pereira 7 1Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), La Laguna, Spain, 2Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), Granadilla de Abona, Spain, 3Agencia Insular de la Energía de Tenerife (AIET), Granadilla de Abona, Spain, 4Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia - Sezione Roma 2, Roma, Italy, 5Department of General Systems Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Japan, 6Universidade de Cabo Verde (UNICV), Praia, Cape Verde, 7Laboratório de Engenharia Civil of Cape Verde (LEC) Tira - Chapéu, Praia, Cape Verde Edited by: We report the results of the geochemical monitoring of the fumarolic discharges at the Pico Francesco Italiano, do Fogo volcano in Cape Verde from 2007 to 2016. During this period Pico do Fogo National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Italy experienced a volcanic eruption (November 23, 2014) that lasted 77 days, from a new vent Reviewed by: ∼2.5 km from the fumaroles. Two fumaroles were sampled, a low (F1∼100°C) and a Pierpaolo Zuddas, medium (F2∼300°C) temperature. The variations observed in the δ18O and δ2H in F1 and Sorbonne Universités, France F2 suggest different fluid source contributions and/or fractionation processes. -
Source to Surface Model of Monogenetic Volcanism: a Critical Review
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Source to surface model of monogenetic volcanism: a critical review I. E. M. SMITH1 &K.NE´ METH2* 1School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Small-scale volcanic systems are the most widespread type of volcanism on Earth and occur in all of the main tectonic settings. Most commonly, these systems erupt basaltic magmas within a wide compositional range from strongly silica undersaturated to saturated and oversatu- rated; less commonly, the spectrum includes more siliceous compositions. Small-scale volcanic systems are commonly monogenetic in the sense that they are represented at the Earth’s surface by fields of small volcanoes, each the product of a temporally restricted eruption of a composition- ally distinct batch of magma, and this is in contrast to polygenetic systems characterized by rela- tively large edifices built by multiple eruptions over longer periods of time involving magmas with diverse origins. Eruption styles of small-scale volcanoes range from pyroclastic to effusive, and are strongly controlled by the relative influence of the characteristics of the magmatic system and the surface environment. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Small-scale basaltic magmatic systems characteris- hazards associated with eruptions, and this is tically occur at the Earth’s surface as fields of small particularly true where volcanic fields are in close monogenetic volcanoes. These volcanoes are the proximity to population centres. -
Anatomy of a Volcanic Eruption: Case Study: Mt. St. Helens
Anatomy of a Volcanic Eruption: Case Study: Mt. St. Helens Materials Included in this Box: • Teacher Background Information • 3-D models of Mt. St. Helens (before and after eruption) • Examples of stratovolcano rock products: Tuff (pyroclastic flow), pumice, rhyolite/dacite, ash • Sandbox crater formation exercise • Laminated photos/diagrams Teacher Background There are several shapes and types of volcanoes around the world. Some volcanoes occur on the edges of tectonic plates, such as those along the ‘ring of fire’. But there are also volcanoes that occur in the middle of tectonic plates like the Yellowstone volcano and Kilauea volcano in Hawaii. When asked to draw a volcano most people will draw a steeply sided, conical mountain that has a depression (crater) at the top. This image of a 'typical' volcano is called a stratovolcano (a.k.a. composite volcano). While this is the often visualized image of a volcano, there are actually many different shapes volcanoes can be. A volcano's shape is mostly determined by the type of magma/lava that is created underneath it. Stratovolcanoes get their shape because of the thick, sticky (viscous) magma that forms at subduction zones. This magma/lava is layered between ash, pumice, and rock fragments. These layers of ash and magma will build into high elevation, steeply sided, conical shaped mountains and form a 'typical' volcano shape. Stratovolcanoes are also known for their explosive and destructive eruptions. Eruptions can cause clouds of gas, ash, dust, and rock fragments to eject into the atmosphere. These clouds of ash can become so dense and heavy that they quickly fall down the side of the volcanoes as a pyroclastic flow. -
Pyroclastic Flow Hazards
Pyroclastic Flow Hazards Lecture Objectives -definition and characteristics -generation of pyroclastic flows -impacts and hazards What are pyroclastic flows? Pyroclastic flows are high- density mixtures of hot, dry rock fragments and hot gases that move away from the vent that erupted them at high speeds. Generation Mechanisms: -explosive eruption of molten or solid rock fragments, or both. -non-explosive eruption of lava when parts of dome or a thick lava flow collapses down a steep slope. Most pyroclastic flows consist of two parts: a basal flow of coarse fragments that moves along the ground, and a turbulent cloud of ash that rises above the basal flow. Ash may fall from this cloud over a wide area downwind from the pyroclastic flow. Mt. St. Helens Effects of pyroclastic flows A pyroclastic flow will destroy nearly everything in its path. With rock fragments ranging in size from ash to boulders traveling across the ground at speeds typically greater than 80 km per hour, pyroclastic flows knock down, shatter, bury or carry away nearly all objects and structures in their way. The extreme temperatures of rocks and gas inside pyroclastic flows, generally between 200°C and 700°C, can cause combustible material to burn, especially petroleum products, wood, vegetation, and houses. Pyroclastic flows vary considerably in size and speed, but even relatively small flows that move <5 km from a volcano can destroy buildings, forests, and farmland. On the margins of pyroclastic flows, death and serious injury to people and animals may result from burns and inhalation of hot ash and gases. Pyroclastic flows generally follow valleys or other low-lying areas and, depending on the volume of rock debris carried by the flow, they can deposit layers of loose rock fragments to depths ranging from less than one meter to more than 200 m. -
Review of Local and Global Impacts of Volcanic Eruptions and Disaster Management Practices: the Indonesian Example
geosciences Review Review of Local and Global Impacts of Volcanic Eruptions and Disaster Management Practices: The Indonesian Example Mukhamad N. Malawani 1,2, Franck Lavigne 1,3,* , Christopher Gomez 2,4 , Bachtiar W. Mutaqin 2 and Danang S. Hadmoko 2 1 Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR 8591, 92195 Meudon, France; [email protected] 2 Disaster and Risk Management Research Group, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (B.W.M.); [email protected] (D.S.H.) 3 Institut Universitaire de France, 75005 Paris, France 4 Laboratory of Sediment Hazards and Disaster Risk, Kobe University, Kobe City 658-0022, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper discusses the relations between the impacts of volcanic eruptions at multiple- scales and the related-issues of disaster-risk reduction (DRR). The review is structured around local and global impacts of volcanic eruptions, which have not been widely discussed in the literature, in terms of DRR issues. We classify the impacts at local scale on four different geographical features: impacts on the drainage system, on the structural morphology, on the water bodies, and the impact Citation: Malawani, M.N.; on societies and the environment. It has been demonstrated that information on local impacts can Lavigne, F.; Gomez, C.; be integrated into four phases of the DRR, i.e., monitoring, mapping, emergency, and recovery. In Mutaqin, B.W.; Hadmoko, D.S. contrast, information on the global impacts (e.g., global disruption on climate and air traffic) only fits Review of Local and Global Impacts the first DRR phase. -
The Science Behind Volcanoes
The Science Behind Volcanoes A volcano is an opening, or rupture, in a planet's surface or crust, which allows hot magma, volcanic ash and gases to escape from the magma chamber below the surface. Volcanoes are generally found where tectonic plates are diverging or converging. A mid-oceanic ridge, for example the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, has examples of volcanoes caused by divergent tectonic plates pulling apart; the Pacific Ring of Fire has examples of volcanoes caused by convergent tectonic plates coming together. By contrast, volcanoes are usually not created where two tectonic plates slide past one another. Volcanoes can also form where there is stretching and thinning of the Earth's crust in the interiors of plates, e.g., in the East African Rift, the Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field and the Rio Grande Rift in North America. This type of volcanism falls under the umbrella of "Plate hypothesis" volcanism. Volcanism away from plate boundaries has also been explained as mantle plumes. These so- called "hotspots", for example Hawaii, are postulated to arise from upwelling diapirs with magma from the core–mantle boundary, 3,000 km deep in the Earth. Erupting volcanoes can pose many hazards, not only in the immediate vicinity of the eruption. Volcanic ash can be a threat to aircraft, in particular those with jet engines where ash particles can be melted by the high operating temperature. Large eruptions can affect temperature as ash and droplets of sulfuric acid obscure the sun and cool the Earth's lower atmosphere or troposphere; however, they also absorb heat radiated up from the Earth, thereby warming the stratosphere. -
Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Augustine Volcano, Alaska
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Augustine Volcano, Alaska by Christopher F. Waythomas and Richard B. Waitt Open-File Report 98-106 This report is preliminary and subject to revision as new data become available. Any use of trade, product or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Volcano Observatory Anchorage, Alaska 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director For additional information: Copies of this report may be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Volcano Observatory Branch of Information Services 4200 University Drive Box 25286 Anchorage, AK 99508 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Summary of hazards at Augustine Volcano....................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................... 3 Purposeandscope ...................................................... 3 Physical setting of Augustine Volcano ...................................... 4 Relation to previous studies on Augustine hazards ............................. 5 Prehistoric eruptive history ................................................... 5 Historical eruptions ......................................................... 8 Hazardous phenomena at Augustine Volcano ..................................... 8 Volcanic hazards ....................................................... 12 Volcanicashclouds -
Deep Electrical Resistivity Tomography for a 3D Picture of the Most Active Sector of Campi Flegrei Caldera A
www.nature.com/scientificreports Corrected: Publisher Correction OPEN Deep Electrical Resistivity Tomography for a 3D picture of the most active sector of Campi Flegrei caldera A. Troiano 1*, R. Isaia1, M. G. Di Giuseppe1, F. D. A. Tramparulo1 & S. Vitale1,2 The central sector of the Campi Flegrei volcano, including the Solfatara maar and Pisciarelli fumarole feld, is currently the most active area of the caldera as regards seismicity and gaseous emissions and it plays a signifcant role in the ongoing unrest. However, a general volcano-tectonic reconstruction of the entire sector is still missing. This work aims to depict, for the frst time, the architecture of the area through the application of deep Electrical Resistivity Tomography. We reconstructed a three- dimensional resistivity model for the entire sector. Results provide useful elements to understand the present state of the system and the possible evolution of the volcanic activity and shed solid bases for any attempt to develop physical-mathematical models investigating the ongoing phenomena. Te present research shows the results of an original application of the deep electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) aimed to investigate the central sector of the Campi Flegrei (CF) caldera (Italy). Te CF caldera (Fig. 1) is one of the most dangerous volcanoes in Europe1,2. Te most active zone, as for seis- micity and gas emission, is currently located in the central sector of the caldera including the volcanic structure of Solfatara, Pisciarelli and Agnano Plain3–5. Intense and recurrent volcanism, culminated in two main caldera forming events, namely the eruption of the Campanian Ignimbrite (39.8 ka)6 and that of the Neapolitan Yellow Tuf (15 ka)7, marks the CF eruptive history.