Tng 71 Spring 1976
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hampshire Area Garden Railway Group
Hampshire Area Garden Railway Group (incorporating the Hampshire area of the Association of 16mm Narrow Gauge Modellers and the Southdown Railway Co.) Associate members of Fareham & District Model Railway Club June 2012 Welcome to the Jubilee Edition of the Newsletter Let’s start with some non-model news from France, the Chemin de fer du Vivarais or Le Mastrou. This was a metre gauge line in the Ardeche region of France, once part of an extensive network of lines it opened in 1891. Le Mastrou faded away as road transport became more economical than rail, des- pite the introduction of railcars, finally closing in 1968 but reopening as a tourist line in 1969. It ran for 21 miles between Tournon and Lamastre using Billiard railcars and SLM mallets, the journey taking two hours each way with an extended turnaround time for lunch. Unfortunately in 2008, outgoings for the repairs to track and stock became more than could be sustained by income and the line was closed. After much discussion and collaboration, in February 2011 a package was put together by local and nation- al institutions amounting to some 13 million Euros to enable the restarting of the line. One year on, and ef- forts have resulted in a new engine shed being com- pleted, much of the line reballasted and stonework re- paired or remade. Stock that was of heritage interest had been moved to other lines in France and has now begun to return allowing a railcar service on some days per week. A new station is programmed to be built at Tournon-St.John with work starting now. -
Moss Vale (Inc) to Unanderra (Exc) OGW-30-28
Division / Business Unit: Safety, Engineering & Technology Function: Operations Document Type: Guideline Network Information Book Main South A Berrima Junction (inc) to Harden (exc) & Moss Vale (inc) to Unanderra (exc) OGW-30-28 Applicability Interstate Network Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source Local Appendices South Volume 2 & 3 Route Access Standard – Defined Interstate Network Section Pages D51 & D52 Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 2.5 3 Sep 2021 Configuration Configuration Acting Standards Acting GM Technical Management Manager Manager Standards Administrator Amendment Record Amendment Date Clause Description of Amendment Version # Reviewed 1.0 12 Sep 16 Initial issue 2.0 8 Sep 17 Various General information sections covering Train Control Centres, Level Crossings, Ruling Grades and Wayside Equipment updated. Exeter © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s intranet or extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document. CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 106 Main South A OGW-30-28 Table of Contents wayside equipment text updated. -
Locos Rolling Stock Track and Buildings Scenery & Electrics
Including Latest News and Offers Secondhand Sales Prices include VAT. Commission Sale items (Prefix SECOM) are sold on behalf of the owner and are open to ’Best Offer’. Please visit our website for up to date details on new and secondhand items. Station Studio, 6 Summerleys Road, Princes Risborough, Bucks, HP27 9DT Tel: 01844 345158 Email: [email protected] Web: www.grsuk.com Visit our Showroom to see the full range that we stock 5 inch ride-on Gauge 3 G45 32mm Locos Rolling Stock Track and Buildings Scenery & Electrics British European American Live steam Battery Digital and Analog We also sell the following: GRS Locomotive, Coach & Freight Kits in Standard Gauge, G Scale (G64) & Narrow Gauge (45 & 32mm), Accessory & Detailing Parts GRS Building kits, Aluminium Bridges, Lineside & Station Accessories, Concrete Products, Garden Railway Books, & DVD’s GRS Services: • Electric Locomotive Repairs & Servicing • Decoder & Sound Fitting & Repairs • Live Steam Locomotive Repairs & Servicing • Radio Control Fitting, Lining, Custom Nameplates • Custom Built Trackwork in 32, 45, 64 and Dual gauge • Secondhand Sales/Trade-ins • Commission Sales • GRS Gift Vouchers • Design & Build - Commercial only Ex-Demo 45mm ‘Electric’ Locos Track Powered GRS Kit-built 45mm Locos Accucraft IOM Caledonia £995.00 Single Fairlie Ex-Demo Rolling stock £750.00 NE style tank on Pr. of C&M Coaches £600.00 G125 Chassis L&B Van £49.00 £750.00 Freelance Diesel in BR Green £450.00 32mm G125 Chassis £299.00 Complete L&B Train - Revo/Battery £1795.00 Complete L&B Train - Revo/Battery -
Derailment and Collision Between Coal Trains Ravenan (25Km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018
Derailment and collision between coal trains Ravenan (25km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018 ATSB Transport Safety Report Rail Occurrence Investigation (Defined) RO-2018-017 Final – 18 December 2020 Cover photo: Source ARTC This investigation was conducted under the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (Commonwealth) by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations (NSW) on behalf of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in accordance with the Collaboration Agreement Released in accordance with section 26 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 2463 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Email: [email protected] Website: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. -
Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop
Division / Business Unit: Enterprise Services Function: Operations Interface Document Type: Route Access Standard Route Access Standard HHN Section Pages H4 - Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement External Only Primary Source Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 1.7 Nov 2017 Manager Stakeholders Manager GM Technical Standards Procedures Standards Development Amendment Record Amendments to the RAS are published at the following link https://www.artc.com.au/uploads/RAS_Amendments_Register.xlsx © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s intranet or extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document. CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 10 Route Access Standard HHN Section Pages H4 - Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop 1 Muswellbrook to Ulan Balloon Loop NB: These line maps are indicative only and should be reviewed in conjunction with the legend on page 3. For more detailed map information refer to the ARTC website. -
Status of TTC 2015 06 Final.Pdf
Status of the Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Technology Center - 2015 Federal Railroad Administration Office of Research, Development, and Technology Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-16/05 Final Report March 2016 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. -
Sydney – Ivanhoe & Albury (SIA)
Sydney – Ivanhoe & Albury (SIA) Config 14 & NSW Super Possession Stage 1 - Chullora Jctn to Enfield West Stage 2 - Enfield West to Glenlee Stage 3 - Glenlee to Berrima Jctn Stage 4 - Berrima Jctn to Moss Vale Stage 5 - Moss Vale to Goulburn Stage 6 - Goulburn to Yass Jctn Stage 7 - Yass Jctn to Junee Stage 8 - Junee to Albury Stage 9 - Cootamundra to Stockinbingal Stage10 - Stockinbingal to Goobang Jctn Stage 1 – 3, 2230hrs Friday 4th Sept – 0200 Monday 7th Sept Stage 4, 0400hrs Saturday 4th Sept – 0200 Monday 7th Sept Stage 5, 2230hrs Friday 4th Sept – 0200 Monday 7th Sept Stage 6 -10, 0600hrs Saturday 5th Sept – 180hrs Monday 7th Sept CONTENTS • Possession Contacts • COVID–19 Declaration • Train Alteration Advice • ARTC Network Rules & Procedures • PPE Requirements • Drug & Alcohol • Communication • Safety • Environmental Management 2 POSSESSION CONTACTS CONFIG 14 CHULLORA JCTN – MOSS VALE 3 POSSESSION CONTACTS MOSS VALE - ALBURY Position Shift Name Phone number Possession Manager (PM) 0600 - 1800 Warren Williams 0438 672 296 Logistics Coordinator 0600 - 1800 Deane Thrower 0477 385 470 Possession Administrator (PA) 0600 - 1800 Michael Gordon 0428 562 906 Work as Executed [email protected] NSW Super Possession PPO’s Moss Vale - Albury PPO (Day) Stage 4,5,6 0600 - 1800 Paul Mangion 0428 341 167 PPO (Night) Stage 4,5,6 1800 - 0600 Tony Bush 0458 092 124 PPO (Day) Stage 7 0600 - 1800 Chris Sternbaur 0497 621 507 PPO (Night) Stage 7 1800 - 0600 Stephen Boyle 0408 864 565 PPO (Day) Stage 8,9,10 0600 - 1800 Craig Diesel 0401 272 818 PPO (Night) Stage 8,9,10 1800 - 0600 Barry Llewellyn 0428 592 661 4 2020 NSW Super Possession COVID-19 COVID-19 Declaration Record DECLARATION ARTC has implemented a COVID-19 declaration form to help manage the safety of our communities, staff and contractors during the current pandemic. -
Railways List
A guide and list to a collection of Historic Railway Documents www.railarchive.org.uk to e mail click here December 2017 1 Since July 1971, this private collection of printed railway documents from pre grouping and pre nationalisation railway companies based in the UK; has sought to expand it‟s collection with the aim of obtaining a printed sample from each independent railway company which operated (or obtained it‟s act of parliament and started construction). There were over 1,500 such companies and to date the Rail Archive has sourced samples from over 800 of these companies. Early in 2001 the collection needed to be assessed for insurance purposes to identify a suitable premium. The premium cost was significant enough to warrant a more secure and sustainable future for the collection. In 2002 The Rail Archive was set up with the following objectives: secure an on-going future for the collection in a public institution reduce the insurance premium continue to add to the collection add a private collection of railway photographs from 1970‟s onwards provide a public access facility promote the collection ensure that the collection remains together in perpetuity where practical ensure that sufficient finances were in place to achieve to above objectives The archive is now retained by The Bodleian Library in Oxford to deliver the above objectives. This guide which gives details of paperwork in the collection and a list of railway companies from which material is wanted. The aim is to collect an item of printed paperwork from each UK railway company ever opened. -
20130627 D107351
Ref: O10_0347 Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority – Floor and ceiling costs proposed by The Pilbara Infrastructure (TPI) 11 June 2013 FLOOR AND CEILING COSTS PROPOSED BY THE PILBARA INFRASTRUCTURE (TPI) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. CONTEXT AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 2 1. Context .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose........................................................................................................................................... 3 3. REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE ........................................................................................................... 4 4. COMMENTS ON COSTS PROPOSED BY TPI ....................................................................................... 5 1. TPI failure to provide costs for proposed access ................................................................... 5 2. TPI failure to provide Costing Model or supporting information ......................................... 5 3. Factors to be considered in an assessment of costs ............................................................. 6 5. BROCKMAN’S ASSESSMENT OF COSTS FOR THE ROUTE .................................................................. 7 6. COMPARISON -
Track Centre Guidance – Double Stack Corridors V3.1 Clarification – Inland Rail Clearance Reference Profiles
TO Network Wide FROM Corporate Services & Safety, General Manager Technical Standards DATE 19 February 2020 SUBJECT Track and Civil Code of Practice – Section 7 Clearances – Technical Note ETD-07-01 TITLE Technical Note - Track Centre Guidance – Double Stack Corridors v3.1 Clarification – Inland Rail Clearance Reference Profiles For all greenfield sites the design references profile shall be Plate F which will encompass all other current ARTC reference profiles. For existing corridor works the objective will be to meet the clearance requirements for the following rollingstock outlines. • Plate D • Plate H • Plate F2 The combination of these templates are colloquially referred to as F2M (F2 Modified), however due to the variations in cross-section dimensions, lengths and bogie pivot positions no single template will apply to all possible track alignments (in curvature and cross-level). Clearances must be designed for the most adverse swept path from the reference plates, in each location. 1.0 References ARTC CoP Section 7 Clearances ARTC 2011 Clearance Policy V3 2.0 Reference Profiles ARTC Code of Practice Section 7 Clearances • Fig 7.5 Rollingstock Outline D (also Appendix E) • Fig 7.7 Rollingstock Outline F • Fig 7.17 Structure Outline for Plate F; Tangent track • Fig 7.18 Structure Outline for Plate F; Curves > 300m Rad • Fig 7.19 Structure Outline for Plate F; Curves < 300m Rad • Appendix C Rollingstock Outline F2 • Appendix D Rollingstock Outline H 3.0 Background Inland Rail will be designed for Plate F double stack operations. The existing tracks clearances were constructed for historic single stack profiles so clearances will need to be redesigned. -
Overview of Wheel/Rail Load Environment Caused by Freight Car Suspension Dynamics
34 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1241 Overview of Wheel/Rail Load Environment Caused by Freight Car Suspension Dynamics SEMIH KALAY AND ALBERT REINSCHMIDT It has been a well-established fact that excessive wheel/rail loads dynamic load factors that represent only the effects of max cause accelerated wheel/rail wear, truck component deterioration, imum dynamic load conditions (7). The most serious problem track damage, and increased potential for derailment. The eco with these types of assumptions is that they neither make any nomic and safety impact of the increased wheel rail loads can only distinction for the effects of suspension design used in differ be ascertained by a total characterization of the wheel/rail loads. In this paper, a comprehensive set of experimental results obtained ent types of freight cars nor describe the variety of track from on-track testing of conventional North American freight cars conditions found in revenue service. Ideally, for design of using both wayside and on-board measurement systems are pre track and fretgh:t car structures, a total description of the load sented. The particular emphasis is given to the wheel/rail loads spectra including low-frequency high-dynamic loads should resulting from suspension dynamics. The dynamic wheel/rail envi be used (8). ronment addressed in this paper is limited to dynamic performance Our purpose in this paper is to provide an overall under regimes such as rock-and-roll and pitch-and-bounce, hunting, and standing of the dynamic load environment encountered under curving. The strong dependence of the dynamic response of a railway vehicle on a truck suspension system has been illustrated typical North American freight cars. -
Why Did Japan Choose the 3'6" Narrow Gauge? Akira Saito
Feature Origin of 3'6" Gauge Why Did Japan Choose the 3'6" Narrow Gauge? Akira Saito ‘The reason why narrow gauge (1067 mm) locomotives were made stronger by Crimean War, becoming the first was adopted for early Japanese railways making them bigger, explaining why the managing engineer of Norway’s Railway is unclear.’ This is the first sentence of 7' broad gauge once offered advantages Construction Bureau. Chapter 6 in A History of Japanese over Robert Stephenson & Company’s 4'8" Norway only became fully independent Railways, 1872–1999 written by four standard gauge. Until the mid-1850s, a from Sweden at the beginning of the 20th well-known specialists in Japanese railway builder could only choose century and was nominally under railways and published in English by between standard gauge and broad gauge, Sweden’s control when Stephenson and EJRCF. (Some Japanese readers might explaining why standard gauge was called Pihl brought the first rail technology to hope for a Japanese version too.) narrow gauge in those days! the country. Clearly, the cheaper narrow I was invited to the publishing party on Gradually, standard gauge spread gauge would have offered advantages to the book’s completion and while glancing throughout Britain and into other parts the builders partly because of Norway’s through my copy I came across the above of Europe but when the builders began difficult topography with many sentence. Surely, I thought, more can be to look towards exports to less-developed mountains, lakes and fjords and partly said on the subject than just that.