DOCSLIB.ORG

Datamation 4 Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Datamation 4 Government -....-~----------......~--- - ~ ~ ------. -- -----.-....-- - -,..,...- ~-_..- - .... ... - --­~-- ---- - - - --- - --- -.~ ---......----.--- ----.------­ -.-... ....- -------- -- - ---~...."..... -----. - - _..... - - -.-.-- ---- -~---- - ----- -- - ~-- - ......-- ---.---- ---- An Online Alternative for Microfiche, Printed Output, Image Data, and more ... Consider these advantages: Multiuser Online Query Mainframe Compatibility Direct Record Access Proven Performance Automated Optical Disk Libraries Cost Savings High Capacity Storage Whether it's coded data or image HIGH CAPACITY STORAGE. languages, as well as multi-user query data, the DW 34800 Optical Storage Data storage capacities from 190 to capability from TSO, CICS, IMS, and, Subsystem stores billions of bytes 760 gigabytes are ordinary tasks for VTAM communications systems. online - so. you can query, process, and the DW 34800, making it a natural SERVICE SUPPORT distribute information on your main­ storage device for the large-capacity Data/Ware's maintenance partnership frame quickly and easily. requirements of image data. Its with National Advanced Systems Call us. flexible configurations handle up to assures a network of DW 34800 parts four libraries and sixteen optical disk and service that will meet your needs We'll tell you how the DW 34800 drives from a single subsystem. Optical Storage Subsystem can put 365 days a year. hundreds of gigabytes of image or DIRECT RECORD ACCESS That's just the beginning. coded data online, providing direct The DW 34800 is fast. It provides you There's a lot more to tell. access to your data and reducing direct access to any data on a drive­ costs at the same time. We'll be mounted platter in milliseconds. Auto­ For further facts about the benefits of glad to answer your questions about mated retrieval of an optical disk in optical storage using the DW 34800, S/370 Optical Storage. the robotic library is in seconds. call Gary Holtwick at ... I DW 34800 performance and features MULTIUSER SHARED ACCESS are available now: Data/Ware's optional Mainframe MAINFRAME COMPATIBILITY Document Storage and Retrieval Data/Ware's DW 34800 Optical Stor­ System software (MDRS) is a conve­ age Subsystem plugs directly into nient application interface aiding IBM® S/370 and PCM systems. It the integration of the DW 34800 into attaches as a standard device directly your document storage and retrieval 9449 Carroll Park Drive to the channel of your mainframe and environment. The MDRS software San Diego, CA 92121 provides you with automated optical provides shared direct access to your Telephone: (619) 453-7660 disk libraries that operate unattended. optically-stored data via high-level FAX: (619) 453-2794 IBM is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation. Circle 4 on Reader Card u.s. CONFERENCES AK Anchorage """"""""""",,.,, August 8 AL Birmingham """""",,""'" August 16k AR Little Rock """"""""",,,,,,,,,,July 13/ AZ Phoenix """",,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,.,,,July 11 Scottsdale"""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,, August 8/ CA LaJollL""""""""""""" August 17k Los Angeles "",July 20fm August 15m Newport Beach"" July 18k August lOa Ontario ";''''''''''',,.,,'''''''''''''' July 27/ Sacramento """""""""""""July 19k San Diego"""""""""""""""July 13/ San Francisco """" , July 25 August 24 Santa Clara""" , July 13/m Augustl7/k Universal City .""""""""""""July 6/ CO Colorado Springs", August 24/ Aug 24g Denver .. """ ...... ,July 20 August 22gk CT Farmington ........ , .......... " .... August 3/ DC Washington ........ July 13gk August 17g FL FI. Lauderdale ................ " .... , July 14k Jacksonville .... " .. ,.. ,........ ,," August 9/ Melborne .......... "" .......... ' August 23k Orlando .. ,.......... ,.. "" .... , ...... , July 12/ GA AtiantL ................ " .......... ,.. July 19/ Savannah ........ " .... " .......... August 10k IA Des Moines..." .. """",, ........... , July 19 IL Chicago ,...... ",July 19/m August 23/k Springfield .......................... , .. )uly 11 IN FI. Wayne ............ " .. " ....... """July 12 Indianapolis " ...... July 18k August 29/ KS Wichita.. ............ "" ............ August 15 KY Lexington ............ """ .. " .. " .... , July 18 LA Baton Rouge ............ " ...... August 24m· New Orleans ...... ",,"," """ " " July 27/ MA Boston " .... "" ........ " ........... August 1/ Burlington .......... , July 12a August 109 MD Baltimore .............................. July 18/ ME PortlanL" ........ " .. " .......... "" July 19 MI Dearborn ........... ,........ "" .. ,July llkm Grand Rapids ...... " ............ ,.. July 13m Lansing .................. " ........ , August 10/ Troy .......... "" .................. August 8am MN Minneapolis.. ...... , July 12k August 9a/ MO Kansas City .......... ""." ...... August 3/k SI. Louis.. .......... July l1/k August 8/m NC Res Tri Park ......... " .. " ........... July 26k NE Omaha.. ...... " ............ " .... """,July 6g NJ Asbury Park .... " .. " ........... " August 8g Iselin ....................... July 20/ July 22/ NM Albuquerque" .............. """ .. , July 20g NY Albany .... " ...... " .. " ...... " ........ , July 11/ East Syracuse .. ,,"' .... ,........ August 10k Melville ........ """,July 19/ August 162 New York City " .. " .... ,July 12/ July 26 ~ochester ..........~~,~~~~.~~.~~~:/i~ OH Akron .... "." .. " ........... " ..... August 2{f Cincinnati .. "" .. July 20/k August 17m Cleveland" .... " .... """ ...... ,,,.,July 26p Columbus ............. "July 5 August 15/ OK Oklahoma City .. """ .......... August 2/0 IBM'·, OR Tigard .... " ............ ""." ...... August 22 PA Harrisburg ................ ""." ... August 15 CorpOration King of Prussia .""." .......... August lSI Phiiadeiphia."""""".,." ... , .. ",.July 6/ delivered'thefrrstcommetcial impletnen­ Pittsburgh ........... "" .... " ...... " July 6m RI Providence""."""." ..... " .. "" .. July 11 'tationof SQL and has since become the SC Charleston """" .. " ...... " ..... "July 20k Columbia ." .. """" ..... ,, .. ,...... July 19k largest database company in the world. Greenville ................ " ... """.July 25k More than just ,. TN Memphis .... "."" ...... " ... " ....... July 11/ Nashville ......... " .. " ........ " .. August 17/ In 1988, IBM again produced a blueprint IX Austin."""." .. "".""" ...... ,, ... July 28k a software company Dallas .. " .......... "July ll/k August Ipa for the future of heterogeneous comput­ Ft Worth """"" ... " ...... " ...... july 180 Houston .......... July 13/p3 August 17/k ing: Systems Application Architecture, or Oracle offers more than just software. San Antonio."."""" .............. July 27k UT Salt Lake City ... " ............... " ... July 25 SAA. Oracle more than endorses this inno­ We offer solutions. No other database VA Norfolk ........ """"" ..... " ...... ,,July IIg vative vision. Oracle is delivering it. Today. company can offer a full suite of services WA ~~We:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::?J~ly W WI Madison ..... """"." .......... ,, August 17/ IBM's goals for SAA: 'l\pplications that including systems integration, education, Milwaukee ..... "."" .............. " July 25k Tbe following key indicates additional afternoon can be ported with less effort; applica­ 2 seminars tbat are offered witb these seminar dates: consulting arid the #1 customer support 3 MaCintosh Networking / Oracle Financials tions that can span systems; user access to in the industry. Which is why Oracle has k CASE/Application Tools I OracleMail these applications that is simpler and become the largest database company in m Computer Integrated Manufacturing a On·line Transaction Processing 3 p PC Product Solutions more uniform; and programming skills, the world. u Unix Please note: that have broader applicability}" Just as SQL was the future of data g Seminars held for Federal Government only. ORACLE is the only database software management in 1978, SAA is the future in • Only the afternoon seminar is held that day. CANADIAN CONFERENCES that runs on mainframes, minicomputers 1989. Make an Oracle seminar part of For registration call (800) 387-4407, except in Quebec, call (514) 337-0755. Edmonton ........... """", ...... ".,,,]uly 6 and PCs. In fact, ORACLE provides data your future, today. Call1-800-345-DBMS Ottawa .. "", ............... luly6 August 3 transparency across your MVS, VM, VSE, to reserve your seat in the next Oracle Vancouver.. ............ Ju y 13 Au~ust 10 and OS/2 environments in addition seminar in your area: So you won't be ~f~~~~aeg ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::'A~g~lt ~~ to over 80 other platforms and operating somebody else's first customer, tomorrow. FREE: Mastering systems. Today. ORACLE by Dan Cronin. Pre-register for the conference by calling the 800- number on the Copyright © 1989 by Oracle Corporation. COMPATIBILITY· PORTABILITY· CONNECTABILITY 20 Davis Drive. Belmont. CA 94002 • World Headquarters left, mention ihe name of Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle (415) 598·8000 • ORACLE Canada (800) 387-4407 (except this publication and you will receive Quebec) • Quebec (514) 337·0755 • ORACLE Systems . a certificate at the conference, entitling C~;f~~tig~h~~~O~~!~~;t~:~t~~~~~~~ Call1-BOO-345-DBMS, ext.B239 today. Australia 61-2·959·5080' ORACLE Europe 44·1·948·6911 • numerous registered trademarks, TRSA ORACLE Systems Hong Kong 852·5·266846 you to a/reecopy of ofthe $24.95 book that has no-nonsense answers to today's I:IBMJournalofSAA 2:DATAPRO survey, August 1988, companies with sales over SID million 3:Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette report pressing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems
    For close to a decade, Cray Research has been the industry leader in large-scale computer systems. Today, about 70 percent of all supercomputers installed worldwide are Cray systems. They are used in advanced scientific and research Eaboratories around the world and have gained strong acceptance in diverse industrial environments. No other manufacturer has Cray Research's breadth of success and experience in supercomputer development. The company's initial product, the CRAY-I Computer System, was first installed in 1976and quickly became the standard for large-scale scientific computers -and the first commercially successful vector processor. For some time previously, the potential advantages of vector processing had been understood, but effective practical implementation had eluded computer architects. The CRAY-1 broke that barrier, and today vectorization techniques are used commonly by scientists and engineers in a wide variety of disciplines. The field-proven GRAY X-MP Computer Systems now offer significantly more power tosolve new and bigger problems while providing better value than any other systems available. Large memory size options allow a wider range of problems to be solved, while innovative multiprocessor design provides practical opportunities to exploit multitasking, the next dimension of parallel processing beyond vectorization. Once again, Cray Research, has moved supercomputing forward, offering new levels of hardware performance and software techniques to serve the needs of scientists and engineers today and in the future. Introducing the CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems Announcing expanded capabilities to serve the needs of a broadening marketplace: the CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems. The CRAY X-MP Series now comprises nine models, ranging from a uniprocessor version with one million words of central memory to a top-end system with four processors and a 16-million-word memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Shooter Recommendations and Analysis for Risk Mitigation
    New York City Police Department Active Shooter Recommendations and Analysis for Risk Mitigation Raymond W. Kelly Police Commissioner Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....ii Part I: Introduction…………………………………………………….………................1 Part II: Recommendations………………………………………………………..………2 Part III: Analysis …………………….…………………………………………………..4 Part IV: Analytic Methodology …………………………………………………….........9 Appendix: Compendium of Active Shooter Incidents - Office Buildings……………………………………………………………...12 - Open Commercial……………………………………………………………29 - Factories and Warehouses……………………………………………………61 - Schools……………………………………………………………………….78 - Other………………………………………………………………………..151 i Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the Counterterrorism Bureau of the New York City Police Department (NYPD), led by Deputy Commissioner Richard Daddario and Assistant Chief James R. Waters. The drafting of this report was a collaborative effort. The various authors and subject-matter experts include: Sgt. Richard Alvarez, Det. John Andersen, Sgt. Christopher Biddle, Lt. Stephenie Clark, Det. Joseph Cotter, Ryan Merola, Det. Peter Montella, Peter Patton, and Capt. Michael Riggio. In addition, NYPD Intelligence Research Specialists Aviva Feuerstein and Nathaniel Young, Det. Raymond McPartland, and Dr. Evan Levine, Chief Scientist for the Office of Risk Management and Analysis at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, made extraordinary contributions to this report; the completion of this work is due largely to their efforts. Active Shooter
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Engineering Task Force January 18-20, 1989 at University
    Proceedings of the Twelfth Internet Engineering Task Force January 18-20, 1989 at University of Texas- Austin Compiled and Edited by Karen Bowers Phill Gross March 1989 Acknowledgements I would like to extend a very special thanks to Bill Bard and Allison Thompson of the University of Texas-Austin for hosting the January 18-20, 1989 IETF meeting. We certainly appreciated the modern meeting rooms and support facilities made available to us at the new Balcones Research Center. Our meeting was especially enhanced by Allison’s warmth and hospitality, and her timely response to an assortment of short notice meeting requirements. I would also like to thank Sara Tietz and Susie Karlson of ACE for tackling all the meeting, travel and lodging logistics and adding that touch of class we all so much enjoyed. We are very happy to have you on our team! Finally, a big thank you goes to Monica Hart (NRI) for the tireless and positive contribution she made to the compilation of these Proceedings. Phill Gross TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CHAIRMANZS MESSAGE 2. IETF ATTENDEES 3. FINAL AGENDA do WORKING GROUP REPORTS/SLIDES UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-AUSTIN JANUARY 18-20, 1989 NETWORK STATUS BRIEFINGS AND TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS O MERIT NSFNET REPORT (SUSAN HARES) O INTERNET REPORT (ZBIGNIEW 0PALKA) o DOEESNET REPORT (TONY HAIN) O CSNET REPORT (CRAIG PARTRIDGE) O DOMAIN SYSTEM STATISTICS (MARK LOTTOR) O SUPPORT FOR 0SI PROTOCOLS IN 4.4 BSD (ROB HAGENS) O TNTERNET WORM(MICHAEL KARELS) PAPERS DISTRIBUTED AT ZETF O CONFORMANCETESTING PROFILE FOR D0D MILITARY STANDARD DATA COMMUNICATIONS HIGH LEVEL PROTOCOL ~MPLEMENTATIONS (DCA CODE R640) O CENTER FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING (U OF TEXAS) Chairman’s Message Phill Gross NRI Chair’s Message In the last Proceedings, I mentioned that we were working to improve the services of the IETF.
    [Show full text]
  • RATFOR User's Guide B
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT 166601 Ames RATFOR User's Guide b Leland C. Helmle (NASA—CH-166601) RATFOR USERS GUIDE 0 (Informatics General Corp,) N85-16490 51 p HC A04/mZ A01 CSCL 09B Unclas G3/61 13243 CONTRACT NAS2— 11555 January 1985 v NASA NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT 166601 *i Ames RATF'OR User's Guide Leland C. Helmle Informatics General Corporation 1121 San Antonio Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 i i _I Prepared for Ames Research Center under Contract NAS2-11555 i n ASA National Aeronautics and 1 Space Administration Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035 '^ I I w Ames R.A.TFOR User's Guide Version 2.0 by Loland C. Helmle Informatics General Corporation July 16, 1983 Prepared under Contract NA52-11555, Task 101 ^ Table of Contents page v 1 Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model
    Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model With Mappings to ACE Requirements for the General Availability User Environment Capabilities Release Version 1.1 Version 1.0: Bob Tomlinson, John Cerutti, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Version 1.1: Manuel Vigil, Jeffrey Johnson, Karen Haskell, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Prepared by the Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scale (ACES), a partnership of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. Approved for public release, unlimited dissemination LA-UR-12-24015 July 2012 Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Disclaimer Unless otherwise indicated, this information has been authored by an employee or employees of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC. (LANS), operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this information. The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. Neither the Government nor LANS makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the use of this information. Bob Tomlinson – Los Alamos National Laboratory John H. Cerutti – Los Alamos National Laboratory Robert A. Ballance – Sandia National Laboratories Karen H. Haskell – Sandia National Laboratories (Editors) Cray, LibSci, and PathScale are federally registered trademarks. Cray Apprentice2, Cray Apprentice2 Desktop, Cray C++ Compiling System, Cray Fortran Compiler, Cray Linux Environment, Cray SHMEM, Cray XE, Cray XE6, Cray XT, Cray XTm, Cray XT3, Cray XT4, Cray XT5, Cray XT5h, Cray XT5m, Cray XT6, Cray XT6m, CrayDoc, CrayPort, CRInform, Gemini, Libsci and UNICOS/lc are trademarks of Cray Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chippewa Operating System
    Chippewa Operating System The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world. The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines. The Chippewa Operating System often called COS is the discontinued operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world. The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines. The Chippewa was a rather simple job control oriented system derived from the earlier CDC 3000 which later influenced Kronos and SCOPE. The name of the system was based on the Chippewa Falls research and The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world.[1] The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines.[2]. Bibliography. Peterson, J. B. (1969). CDC 6600 control cards, Chippewa Operating System. U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Categories: Operating systems. Supercomputing. Wikimedia Foundation. 2010. The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world.[1] The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines.[2]. This operating system at Control Data Corporation was distinct from and preceded the Cray Operating System (also called COS) at Cray.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Performance Comparisons for a Fluid Dynamics Code
    NBSIR 87-3638 Some Performance Comparisons for a Fluid Dynamics Code Daniel W. Lozier Ronald G. Rehm U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Applied Mathematics Gaithersburg, MD 20899 September 1987 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBSIR 87-3638 SOME PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS FOR A FLUID DYNAMICS CODE Daniel W. Lozier Ronald G. Rehm U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Applied Mathematics Gaithersburg, MD 20899 September 1987 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Clarence J. Brown, Acting Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director - 2 - 2. BENCHMARK PROBLEM In this section we describe briefly the source of the benchmark problem, the major logical structure of the Fortran program, and the parameters of three different specific instances of the benchmark problem that vary widely in the amount of time and memory required for execution. Research Background As stated in the introduction, our purpose in benchmarking computers is solely in the interest of further- ing our investigations into fundamental problems of fire science. Over a decade ago, stimulated by federal recognition of very large losses of fife and property by fires each year throughout the nation, NBS became actively involved in a national effort to reduce such losses. The work at NBS ranges from very practical to quite theoretical; our approach, which proceeds directly from basic principles, is at the theoretical end of this spectrum. Early work was concentrated on developing a mathematical model of convection arising from a prescribed source of heat in an enclosure, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • View Article(3467)
    Problems of information technology, 2018, №1, 92–97 Kamran E. Jafarzade DOI: 10.25045/jpit.v09.i1.10 Institute of Information Technology of ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan [email protected] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SOFTWARE USED IN SUPERCOMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES The article considers the classification of the types of supercomputer architectures, such as MPP, SMP and cluster, including software and application programming interfaces: MPI and PVM. It also offers a comparative analysis of software in the study of the dynamics of the distribution of operating systems (OS) for the last year of use in supercomputer technologies. In addition, the effectiveness of the use of CentOS software on the scientific network "AzScienceNet" is analyzed. Keywords: supercomputer, operating system, software, cluster, SMP-architecture, MPP-architecture, MPI, PVM, CentOS. Introduction Supercomputer is a computer with high computing performance compared to a regular computer. Supercomputers are often used for scientific and engineering applications that need to process very large databases or perform a large number of calculations. The performance of a supercomputer is measured in floating-point operations per second (FLOPS) instead of millions of instructions per second (MIPS). Since 2015, the supercomputers performing up to quadrillion FLOPS have started to be developed. Modern supercomputers represent a large number of high performance server computers, which are interconnected via a local high-speed backbone to achieve the highest performance [1]. Supercomputers were originally introduced in the 1960s and bearing the name or monogram of the companies such as Seymour Cray of Control Data Corporation (CDC), Cray Research over the next decades. By the end of the 20th century, massively parallel supercomputers with tens of thousands of available processors started to be manufactured.
    [Show full text]
  • System Programmer Reference (Cray SV1™ Series)
    ® System Programmer Reference (Cray SV1™ Series) 108-0245-003 Cray Proprietary (c) Cray Inc. All Rights Reserved. Unpublished Proprietary Information. This unpublished work is protected by trade secret, copyright, and other laws. Except as permitted by contract or express written permission of Cray Inc., no part of this work or its content may be used, reproduced, or disclosed in any form. U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED RIGHTS NOTICE: The Computer Software is delivered as "Commercial Computer Software" as defined in DFARS 48 CFR 252.227-7014. All Computer Software and Computer Software Documentation acquired by or for the U.S. Government is provided with Restricted Rights. Use, duplication or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to the restrictions described in FAR 48 CFR 52.227-14 or DFARS 48 CFR 252.227-7014, as applicable. Technical Data acquired by or for the U.S. Government, if any, is provided with Limited Rights. Use, duplication or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to the restrictions described in FAR 48 CFR 52.227-14 or DFARS 48 CFR 252.227-7013, as applicable. Autotasking, CF77, Cray, Cray Ada, Cray Channels, Cray Chips, CraySoft, Cray Y-MP, Cray-1, CRInform, CRI/TurboKiva, HSX, LibSci, MPP Apprentice, SSD, SuperCluster, UNICOS, UNICOS/mk, and X-MP EA are federally registered trademarks and Because no workstation is an island, CCI, CCMT, CF90, CFT, CFT2, CFT77, ConCurrent Maintenance Tools, COS, Cray Animation Theater, Cray APP, Cray C90, Cray C90D, Cray CF90, Cray C++ Compiling System, CrayDoc, Cray EL, CrayLink,
    [Show full text]
  • Active Shooter: Recommendations and Analysis for Risk Mitigation
    . James P. O’Neill . Police Commissioner . John J. Miller . Deputy Commissioner of . Intelligence and . Counterterrorism ACTIVE SHOOTER James R. Waters RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANALYSIS Chief of Counterterrorism FOR RISK MITIGATION 2016 EDITION AS RELEASED BY THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................3 RECENT TRENDS ........................................................................................................................6 TRAINING & AWARENESS CHALLENGE RESPONSE .................................................................................... 6 THE TARGETING OF LAW ENFORCEMENT & MILITARY PERSONNEL: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE SECURITY ........ 7 ATTACKERS INSPIRED BY A RANGE OF IDEOLOGIES PROMOTING VIOLENCE ................................................... 8 SOCIAL MEDIA PROVIDES POTENTIAL INDICATORS, SUPPORTS RESPONSE .................................................... 9 THE POPULARITY OF HANDGUNS, RIFLES, AND BODY ARMOR NECESSITATES SPECIALIZED TRAINING .............. 10 BARRICADE AND HOSTAGE-TAKING REMAIN RARE OCCURRENCES IN ACTIVE SHOOTER EVENTS .................... 10 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................11 POLICY .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HP Advancenet for Engineering Dave Morse Hewlett-Packard Company 3404 East Harmony Road Fort Collins, Co 80525
    HP AdvanceNet for Engineering Dave Morse Hewlett-Packard Company 3404 East Harmony Road Fort Collins, co 80525 INTRODUCTION As one of the five solutions in the HP AdvanceNet offering, HP AdvanceNet for Engineering addresses the networking needs of technical professionals engaged in engineering and other technical pursuits. This solution features the same emphasis on standards common to the other solutions. The solution is best understood by considering a model computing environment for engineering. MODEL ENVIRONMENT .........A6,..... -T.mnlll ICCNI -Fl1eJlfr -ARMGW Toe -ou.lIftIS -*"" -OffICe - ~ 01 WS Dirt. CII5K-tIGIO - StnIrG BuI Doen ... -~n - RIlle oil'"tat.ncllrdl) - Ststa v: Blrlllllr u _to -1JItr1lUtldC6 -WhkIwI -SftIIM,.tIOnIId8D_ - TtndlItac_ CD ftIlWOdI -Fllt-..- -PI$.....,... -Fu.Jlfr toftllWOdl -DICInIa. -Al"utv - TICMIDII offtce ...cton - .......-.-aon -PC-oo&fIN -ApIlOedDftIOlCtllc9N HlWlltt-JlcIcn I ~~ ---------- ,a..,., The diagram of the environment shows many of the key characteristics of both the computers and the network. A major trend in the engineering area in the past few years has 2030-1 been a move to engineering workstations and acceptance of the UNIX operating system as a defacto standard. These workstations offer many advantages in terms of powerful graphics and consistent performance; but in order to be effective, they must easily integrate with the installed base of timeshare computers and other larger computers which may be added in the future. The resulting environment represents a range of computing power from personal computers to mainframes and super computers. In almost all cases, these computers will be supplied by several different vendors. In order for users to realize the maximum benefit of this environment, they should retain the desirable characteristics of the timeshare environment - easy information sharing and centralized system management - and also gain the benefits of the workstations in terms of distributed computing power.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Alumni Embrace Tech Industry Catching up with George Carlisle
    Alumni Horae ST. PAUL’S SCHOOL WINTER 2016 Young alumni embrace tech industry Catching up with George Carlisle Milkey ’74 reflects on landmark case SCHOOLHOUSE READING ROOM / PHOTO: PERRY SMITH 1 RECTOR Adapting for the Future As we began our It turns out my fears about the impact of such budgeting process a primitive technology as landline telephones PETER FINGER earlier this winter, were overblown, at least temporarily. Students our IT director sug- and teachers still communicated face-to-face, gested we discontinue still smiled at one another in person – they still technical support for do. But thinking back to those earlier concerns, it hard-wired phones seems FAT’s notion about the risks of technology in all student rooms. may not have been completely out of place. These He explained that our risks were recently summarized in the title of MIT students no longer sociologist Sherry Turkle’s book Alone Together: use landline phones. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less I was assured that discontinuing this service from Each Other. would not compromise the safety of our students, The complex issue of how technology is chang- who would still have landline access, if they ever ing relationships is very much on our minds at needed it, in their house common rooms. So, the School. In June, Dr. Turkle and other scholars landline phones died quietly in a budget meeting. and school leaders from around the country will I remember the introduction of phones in stu- join us for a St. Paul’s School symposium entitled dent rooms 20 years ago.
    [Show full text]