DOCSLIB.ORG

Spinoza, the Epicurean Table of Topics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spinoza, the Epicurean Table of Topics Spinoza, the Epicurean Authority and Utility in Materialism Dimitris Vardoulakis Visit the book's webpage to find out more: https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-spinoza-the-epicurean-hb.html Table of Topics Preface 1. Why does it Matter to Read Spinoza as an Epicurean? Different versions of Spinoza’s materialism • No history of materialism • The potential that the lack of a history of materialism creates for Spinoza • Materialism and monism (no ex nihilo) • Epicurean materialism: critique of authority and practical judgment 2. Authority and Utility: A Sketch Definition of authority • Authority as theologico-political • Tractatus de auctoritate • Authority and the structure of the Theological Political Treatise • Instrumental rationality in ancient ethics • Epicureanism and phronesis • ‘ratio utilitatis’ • Neoepicureanism: calculation of utility in materialism • Tension between authority and utility 3. On Method Immanent Critique • The ruse of the obvious • The parallel operation of the three epicurean themes: Authority – political monism – utility • Method of reading Introduction: Why is Spinoza an Epicurean? 1. ‘The authority of Plato, Aristotle and Socrates carries little weight with me’: Spinoza and Epicureanism The dialectic of authority and utility • The epicurean school • Epicureanism as sensualism • Letter to Menoeceus: phronesis • Calculation of utility in Ethics IV • Two paths to virtue • Epicureanism as Corpuscularianism (physicalism) • Monism as rejection of creations ex nihilo • Inseparability of mind and body • Letter 56 • Epicureanism and Christian metaphysics • Epicureanism, empiricism and the rise of natural sciences • Naturalism • Naturalism vs religion (Strauss) • Deleuze: Lucretius and Spinoza’s naturalism • Althusser: Spinoza and materialist politics • Guyau: Epicureanism as utilitarianism 2. The Three Themes of Spinoza’s Epicureanism: Authority, Monism, and Judgment The rediscovery of epicurean texts in modernity • Alison Brown: the three disparate epicurean themes in modernity • The synthesis of the three themes in Spinoza • Authority • Fear and superstition • Authority as impervious to argumentation • The theological and political origins of authority • Examples of authority • Authority and the Reformation • Monism • Totality precedes knowledge • The anthropological principle (mind and body) • Affect theory, new materialism, post-humanism • Practical Judgment • Totality entails practical judgment (fallibility of knowledge) • Ethics II P11 • Absurdity of monism without practical judgment (Bayle) • Phronesis • Not Kantian practical Judgment • Not Utilitarianism (fallibility and intersubjectivity) • Translation of phronesis as utility (historical context) • Utility in Ethics IV • Mutual interaction of the three epicurean themes Spinoza, the Epicurean by Dimitris Vardoulakis Table of Topics 1 3. The Dialectic of Authority and Utility: Spinoza’s Promise What is the utility of Spinoza’s epicureanism? • Formation of Society • The politics entailed by the dialectic of authority and utility • Spinoza’s promise of the good • The dialectic of authority and utility as heuristic device • The forgetting of authority in contemporary political philosophy and theory • The two kinds of authority • Authoritarianism without authority (Trump) • Sovereignty and authority • The dialectic of authority and utility and democracy • Democracy as the most natural constitution • Opposition to instrumentality • Instrumentality as symptom of neoliberalism • How Spinoza’s conception of utility offers a democratic alternative to neoliberal instrumentality • The fallibility of phronesis and democracy 1. Freedom as Overcoming the Fear of Death: The Dialectic of Authority and Utility in the Preface The strange use of the ‘freedom to philosophize’ in the subtitle’ • Freedom and the dialectic of authority and utility 1. ‘A free man thinks of nothing less than of death…’: Fear and Freedom in Epicurus The lack of definition of freedom in Spinoza • Ethics IV P67 • Fear and superstition • Overcoming fear in Epicurus • Phronesis as the balance of thought and emotion in Aristotle • Phronesis as the source of virtue in Epicurus • The epicurean rejection of creation ex nihilo and Spinoza’s monism • Ataraxia • ‘Death is nothing to us’ • Freedom as exercise of phronesis (incompatible with free will) • The problem of determinism • Causality is distinguished from instrumentality • The primacy of practical knowledge • The importance of the question of error 2. Ante‐secularism: The Construction of Authority and Human Nature in Lucretius The absence of a theory of power in Epicurus • Lucretius’s two innovations (power and history) • Religio as authority • Potestas and potential • Freedom to judge • Phronesis and history • Creation and destruction • The three stages of social formation (On the Nature of Things, book 5) • Phronesis, religio and history • Post-secularism vs. ante-secularism • Authority as both positive and negative 3. ‘Fighting for their servitude as if for salvation’: Monarchy versus Democracy Voluntary servitude as the suspension of judgment • La Boétie • Voluntary servitude as desire (Anti-Oedipus) • Overcoming voluntary servitude as the suspension of the dialectic of authority and utility (Lordon) • Seditio • Salus • Democracy as agonistic practice • No end to the dialectic of authority and utility • The parallel operation of the three epicurean themes 2. The Power of Error: Moses, the Prophets, and the People (Chapters 1, 2, and 3) 1. Moses: Prophesy as Communication The double origin of authority • Moses as the exemplary figure of authority • Spinoza’s definition of prophesy • Rosselli’s Moses • Imagination ‘beyond the limits of the intellect’ • Instrumentality and fallibility • Ferdinand Bal’s Moses • Rembrandt’s Moses • Why Spinoza does not mention Moses’s order for capital punishment • The error about prophesy and natural knowledge • The interplay of potentia and potestas 2. ‘God has no particular style of speech’: The Error about God’s Potentia God has no potestas • The prophets’ error • What is error good for • Signs and the production of authority • The prophet and the sovereign (note 2) Spinoza, the Epicurean by Dimitris Vardoulakis Table of Topics 2 3. Encountering the People: Causality and Instrumentality The error of the people • The Hebrew and the Dutch • Against Calvinist predestination • Against contractarianism • Machiavelli and the distinction of instrumentality and causality • Against Machiavelli • Against colonialism • Equality 3. Philonomianism: Law and Origin of Finitude (Chapter 4) The two definitions of the law • The epicurean conception of the law 1. Ratio Vivendi: Law and Living Different translation of ratio vivendi • The distinction of human and divine law depends on two different kinds of utility • Law as calculation of utility • Philonomianism • Antinomianism • Legal positivism and decisionism • The uses of epicurean law 2. ‘You cannot make a republic without killing people’: The Tragedy of Legitimacy without Authority in Hannah Arendt Law and foundations • Legality and constituent power • Arendt’s definition of authority • Arendt’s genealogy of authority • The modern tragedy of the legality without foundation 3. On the Origins of Finitude: History as Tragedy or Comedy? The new as ontological ground of the political • Republicanism and authority • The relation of authority and utility in Arendt • The difficulties facing Arendt’s privileging of legality over justification • Can God be conceived as a ruler? • Spinoza’s retelling of the Fall • History as comedy • Disobedience as the condition of the possibility of the dialectic of authority and utility • Antinomianism and the three epicurean themes 4. Political Monism: The Primacy of Utility over Authority (Chapters 5 and 6) What comes first, authority or utility? • Resistance and power 1. ‘Society is advantageous’: Utility and Social Formation Ceremonies as human law • The Hebrew State in the social contract tradition • Arguing from Scripture and reason • The origin of society in mutual utility • The epicurean account of the origin of society • Clastres and the principle of efficiency • Authority as an effect of utility • No absolute authority 2. Natural and Agonistic Democracy Three inferences about the priority of utility over authority • 1. Natural democracy and the state of authority • The difference from Clastres • 2. Utility as the common denominator for natural democracy and the state of authority • 3. Agonistic democracy 3. Political Monism: The Utility of Miracles Monism in Ecclesiastes • Rational rejection of miracles • Pierre Bayle’s attack on monism as apolitical • Hegel’s acosmism • Leo Strauss: either monism or miracles • Mercenary morality • Non-political epicureanism • The correlation of the three epicurean themes in the historical narratives of Scripture • The utility of miracles • Political Monism 5. Love Your Friend as Yourself: The Neighbour and the Politics of Biblical Hermeneutics (Chapters 7 to 13) Reformed authority • A new sense of obedience? Spinoza, the Epicurean by Dimitris Vardoulakis Table of Topics 3 1. Monism and Interpretation: No Meaning outside the Text Truth of meaning vs truth of things • Monism and Biblical hermeneutics • Epicurean background to Spinoza’s method of interpretation • The epicurean theory language • The usefulness of Scripture • Neighbourly love as reciprocal utility • Truth vs falsity of meaning • Scepticism • Dogmatism • Averroism • Maimonides and the rejection of monism • The people have the last
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard
    Journal of Buddhist Ethics ISSN 1076-9005 http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/ Volume 22, 2015 A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard Mary Jeanne Larrabee DePaul University Copyright Notice: Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format, with the exception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author. All en- quiries to: [email protected]. A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard Mary Jeanne Larrabee 1 Abstract I present a case for a love that has a wisdom knowing nothing. How this nothing functions underlies what Kier- kegaard urges in Works of Love and how Zen compassion moves us to action. In each there is an ethical call to love in action. I investigate how Kierkegaard’s “religiousness B” is a “second immediacy” in relation to God, one spring- ing from a nothing between human and God. This imme- diacy clarifies what Kierkegaard takes to be the Christian call to love. I draw a parallel between Kierkegaard’s im- mediacy and the expression of immediacy within a Zen- influenced life, particularly the way in which it calls the Zen practitioner to act toward the specific needs of the person standing before one. In my understanding of both Kierkegaard and Zen life, there is also an ethics of re- sponse to the circumstances that put the person in need, such as entrenched poverty or other injustices. 1 Department of Philosophy, DePaul University. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Ateísmo, Panteísmo, Acosmismo Y Monoteísmo En La Filosofía De Hegel | Javier Fabo Lanuza
    Ateísmo, panteísmo, acosmismo y monoteísmo en la filosofía de Hegel | Javier Fabo Lanuza Ateísmo, panteísmo, acosmismo y monoteísmo en la filosofía de Hegel (Comentario de un conocido pasaje sobre Spinoza) PhD. Javier Fabo Lanuza. Universidad Complutense de Madrid ([email protected]) Resumen Abstract Ateísmo y panteísmo son sistemáticamente Atheism, pantheism, acosmism and rechazados por Hegel a lo largo de su obra. monotheism in Hegel's philosophy Testimonio paradigmático de este rechazo es la (Commentary on a well-known Anm. del § 573 de la Enz., en la que el filósofo critica duramente el panteísmo, a la vez que se passage on Spinoza) desmarca netamente del ateísmo. Ello no ha impedido que los más afines a su filosofía Atheism and pantheism have been vieran en su crítica de la religión una systematically rejected by Hegel throughout his declaración de ateísmo, ni tampoco que su work. The Anm. of § 573 of the Enz. is a idealismo absoluto apareciera a ojos de los más paradigmatic testimony of this rejection, in críticos como una suerte de panteísmo which the philosopher strongly criticizes soterrado, sospechosamente afín a lo que Heine pantheism, and at the same time he clearly 267 llamaba «la religión secreta de Alemania». El distances himself from atheism. This has not Nº 101 propósito de este artículo es mostrar los prevented those closest to his philosophy from Julio-agosto 2021 malentendidos que subyacen a estas seeing in his critique of religion a declaration of interpretaciones, analizando los pasajes que atheism, nor has his absolute idealism appear to han contribuido a suscitarlas, de entre los que the most critical eyes as a kind of buried destaca el célebre elogio a Spinoza de las pantheism, suspiciously akin to what Heine Lecciones berlinesas, erróneamente tomado called «the secret religion of Germany».
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Philosophy Of
    L- ,o C| L> t ty- NUI MAYNOOTH Ollacali •• atiraann Wt Huad BOHM E AND HEGEL: A STUDY OF THEIR INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND SHARED READINGS OF TWO CHRISTIAN THEOLOGOUMENA NEIL O’DONNELL SUBMITTED WITH A VIEW TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF M.LITT. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, MAYNOOTH DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, FACULTY OF ARTS, CELTIC STUDIES, AND PHILOSOPHY OCTOBER 2008 ACTING HEAD OF DEPARTMENT DR MICHAEL DUNNE SUPERVISED BY DR CYRIL MCDONNELL CONTENTS Preface IV Abstract v Abbreviations and Conventions vii INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I THE DEVELOPMENT OF BÖHME AND HEGEL’S PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Section One Reaction Against Christian Orthodoxy 6 § 1. 1. The Development o f Böhme ’s Theological Vision in the Face o f Protestant Orthodoxy 7 § 1. 2. Hegel, Tübingen, and Protestant Orthodoxy 16 Section Two Heterodox Leanings 27 § 2. 1. Böhme ’s Period o f Silence and the Failure o f Hermeticism 28 § 2. 2. Hegel's Swabian Heritage 38 Section Three The Return to the Reformation 53 § 3. 1. Böhme ’s Return to the Reformation 54 § 3. 2. Hegel the Reformer? 68 § 3. 3. 1. Liberating Religion from Representation 76 CHAPTER II THE CONCEPT OF GOD 86 Section One The Father 91 § 1. 1. Böhme 's Conception o f the Deus Absconditus 96 § 1. 2. Hegel’s Treatment o f Böhme 's Trinitarian Dynamic 107 § 1. 3. H eg e l’s G od and its H istorical Traces 112 Section Two The Son 119 § 2. 1. The Personhood o f the Trinity 120 §2. 2. The Incarnation 130 Section Three The Holy Spirit 144 § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinoza's Acosmism in Another Light
    THE DAY IN WHICH ALL COWS ARE WHITE: SPINOZA’S ACOSMISM IN ANOTHER LIGHT Jason DOCKSTADER* Abstract. In this essay, I aim to defend Spinoza against Hegel’s claim that he annihilated finite things and the real differences they instantiate. To counter Hegel’s charge of acosmism, I try to conceive of a Spinozist kind of acosmism that would mean not a metaphysical eliminativism or nihilism about finitude and diversity, but rather a metaphysical fictionalism about finitude that entails a latent application of the principle of the discernibility of identicals. I do this by focusing on the correspondence between Spinoza’s three kinds of knowledge – imagination, intellection, and intuition – and his understanding of things as being finite, infinite in kind, and absolutely infinite. In the process, I also entertain Yitzhak Melamed’s argument that Hegel was wrong to accuse Spinoza of acosmism, but was onto something by noting the lack of full or self-subsistent existence on the part of finite modes. Melamed offers a reading that claims Spinozist individuals are weak and functional properties that follow from God as his effects. I respond that Melamed would be correct only if we view things from the perspective of the first kind of knowledge, which is a perspective that is by definition false. I conclude, then, that finite things in Spinoza, qua finite, are not illusions, but fictions, and that when viewed truly or truthfully they are so many infinite in kind or absolutely infinite ways one infinite and eternal substance, God or nature, is discernibly identical to itself. Keywords: Spinoza, Hegel, Acosmism, Discernibility, Infinite, Knowledge, Truth I.
    [Show full text]
  • ART4 Dial107articulomiguelbadia Reveh8dec2020
    HEGEL’S APPROACH TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD IN THE LECTURES ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Miguel A. Badía Cabrera Universidad de Puerto Rico [email protected] Resumen: Con las Lecciones sobre la filosofía de la religión Hegel muy probablemente se convierte no sólo en un predecesor, sino en el fundador de la filosofía de la religión contemporánea. Esto es así porque en esta obra esboza un acercamiento original al conocimiento de Dios. Cuando Hegel dilucida el concepto de religión como la “consciencia” (Bewusstsein), y en especial la “ocupación” (Beschäftigung) del ser humano con Dios, diferencia la perspectiva objetiva de la teología natural del punto de vista doblemente subjetivo de la filosofía de la religión. Mientras que en la primera disciplina Dios es aprehendido como un objeto “abstracto” del pensamiento —Dios como meramente es en sí mismo—, en la segunda conocer a Dios es primariamente percatarse de él como un sujeto “concreto” que aparece a los sujetos que nosotros somos, ya que “El Espíritu de Dios es esencialmente en su comunidad”. El énfasis de Hegel en “esta esfera íntima” (dies Innerste) ejemplariza un enfoque análogo al de pensadores medulares del siglo veinte quienes, a partir de tradiciones filosóficas diferentes, aseveran que el conocimiento de Dios hay que sacarlo de adentro. Palabras clave: Hegel, filosofía de la religión, Dios, religión, Espíritu, Innerste, Unamuno Abstract: With the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Hegel arguably becomes not just a forerunner, but the founder of contemporary philosophy of religion. This is because in this work he delineates an original approach to the knowledge of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Māyā and Becoming: Deleuze and Vedānta on Attributes, Acosmism
    COMPARATIVE AND CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2018.1488354 Māyā and Becoming: Deleuze and Vedānta on Attributes, Acosmism, and Parallelism in Spinoza Michael Hemmingsen Division of Humanities, College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences, University of Guam, Guam, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This paper compares two readings of Baruch Spinoza – those of Deleuze; Vedānta; Spinoza; Gilles Deleuze and Rama Kanta Tripathi – with a particular focus māyā; becoming on three features of Spinoza’s philosophy: the relationship between substance and attribute; the problem of acosmism and unity; and the problem of the parallelism of attributes. Deleuze and Tripathi’s understanding of these three issues in Spinoza’s thought illustrates for us their own concerns with becoming over substance (in the non-Spinozistic sense) and māyā, respectively. This investigation provides not just two interesting and contradictory interpretations of Spinoza, but also gives us insight into Deleuze’s metaphysics and Tripathi’s Vedāntic philosophy. Interpreting historical thinkers often brings with it the concerns and preconceptions of those engaged in the reading. As such, in considering the views of later interpreters of a philosopher or philosophy, we can sometimes learn just as much about the views of those doing the interpreting as we can about the “correct” way of reading the original phi- losopher. A good example of this appears in contemporary readings of Baruch Spinoza. In this paper, I look at Spinoza through the eyes of Gilles Deleuze and Rama Kanta Tripathi. Their interpretations of Spinoza help to illuminate some of the concerns and presupposi- tions in their own thought and help us further understand their own philosophical pos- itions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel on Indian Philosophy: Spinozism, Romanticism, Eurocentrism Gino Signoracci University of New Mexico
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Philosophy ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-4-2017 Hegel on Indian Philosophy: Spinozism, Romanticism, Eurocentrism Gino Signoracci University of New Mexico Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phil_etds Part of the Comparative Philosophy Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Signoracci, Gino. "Hegel on Indian Philosophy: Spinozism, Romanticism, Eurocentrism." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ phil_etds/24 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gino Signoracci Candidate Philosophy Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Adrian Johnston, Chairperson John Taber Brent Kalar Iain Thomson Shannon Mussett i HEGEL ON INDIAN PHILOSOPHY: SPINOZISM, ROMANTICISM, EUROCENTRISM by GINO SIGNORACCI B.A., Philosophy, English, University of Notre Dame, 2004 M.A., Philosophy, Brock University, 2009 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Philosophy The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July, 2017 ii DEDICATION For Ally, for turning up, keeping up, putting up, picking (me) up, and never letting up: with love, good humor, and wonder iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are seven people whose abiding support, encouragement, sensitivity, patience, and understanding are the reason I completed this dissertation at all: Adrian, Ally, Jane, Jon, Judy, Kaity, and Krupa.
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhak Y. Melamed Curriculum Vitae (10.23.2016) 7808 Crossland Road, Baltimore, MD 21208 Phone: (410) 484-0276 Email: [email protected]
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed Curriculum Vitae (10.23.2016) 7808 Crossland Road, Baltimore, MD 21208 Phone: (410) 484-0276 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 1996-2005 Yale University - Ph.D., Philosophy (2005). Dissertation The Metaphysics of Substance and the Metaphysics of Thought in Spinoza. Advisor: Professor Michael Della Rocca. 1992-1996 Tel Aviv University - M.A. in History and Philosophy of Science, Summa cum laude. Master's thesis: The Liar Paradox, Sentence Construction, and the atemporality of Logic. 1991-1995 Tel Aviv University - B.A.-M.A. Program, The Elkana-Lautman Interdisciplinary Program for Outstanding Students. Main fields of study: Philosophy, Neuropsychology, and Mathematics. 1990-1991 Tel Aviv University - B.A. Studies, Psychology and Philosophy. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Early Modern Philosophy; German Idealism. AREAS OF COMPETENCE Metaphysics (primarily, tropes, mereology, and time); 19th Century Philosophy; Medieval Philosophy; History & Philosophy of Science; Political philosophy. TEACHING EXPERIENCE July 2016 Johns Hopkins University. Charlotte Bloomberg Professor of Philosophy and the Humanities. 2013 - 2016 Johns Hopkins University. Professor. Department of Philosophy. Courses taught: “The Identity of Indiscernibles”; “Spinoza’s Metaphysics”; “History of Modern Philosophy”; “Spinoza’s Theological Political Treatise”; “Spinoza and German Idealism” (co-taught with Eckart Förster); “Topics in Metaphysics: Mereology”; “Spinoza and the Pantheism Controversy” (co- taught with Eckart Förster); “Descartes”; “Kant and the Early
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Dillon.Indd
    International Journal for the Study of New Religions 9.1 (2018) 57–81 ISSN 2041-9511 (print) ISSN 2041-952X (online) https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.37614 he Impact of Scholarship on Contemporary “Gnosticism(s)”: A Case Study on the Apostolic Johannite Church and Jeremy Puma Matthew J. Dillon DePauw University [email protected] his article examines the impact of academic discourses on Neo-Gnosticism. he identities and ritual practices of Neo-Gnostics are constructed with refer- ence to Gnostic Studies. Analysis of two case studies (the Apostolic Johannite Church and Jeremy Puma) shows how academic discourse legitimizes, chal- lenges, or reforms Gnostic identity in the twenty-irst century. Transformations and inventions of ancient Gnostic religion in the twenty- first century take place in a crowded field of discourse.1 here are dozens, per- haps hundreds of organized Gnostic churches in North America.2 Prominent artists, writers, and intellectuals claim to be Gnostics and produce works that 1. I use the term discourse in line with Jan Assmann to refer to “a concatenation of texts which are based on each other and treat or negotiate a common subject matter” (Ass- mann YEAR, 15–16). Lincoln (1989) exhibits how such discourses (in myth, ritual, and classification) on the past serve to negotiate religious identities. Post-structuralist approaches to discourse analysis, stressing the symbolic capital entrenched in particular discourses and the power dynamics inherent in the definition of terms, is a diferent project (Foucault 1972; Gee 1999); in action regarding the study of esotericism see for example, Robertson (2010); von Stuckrad (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Soudan2020.Pdf (1.383Mb)
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. SPELLS OF OUR INHABITING: TRANSITIONING FROM THE SPECTRE OF GNOSTIC ESTRANGEMENT TO A PHILOSOPHY OF ENTANGLED OVERFLOWING Clara SOUDAN PhD in Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2019 This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinoza's Philosophy & Nihilism
    Spinoza’s Philosophy & Nihilism God, Truth, and Freedom in an Uncaring Universe M.G. (Gaby) de Jong MA Thesis Philosophy – University Utrecht Student Number: 3697975 Program: Academic Master Philosophy Thesis Advisor: dr. Albert Gootjes Second Reader dr. Johan de Jong Date of Submission: 24/05/2017 Total Word Count: 21034 (main text: 18333) Contact: [email protected] 1 “Spinoza has been claimed as the ancestor, founder, or originator of many things, both good and evil, among them the ruin of all religions, biblical criticism, liberalism, Jewish secularism, Zionism, the enlightenment, secularization, neurobiology, evolutionary theory, toleration, libertarianism, and modernity as such. Taken together these claims are too good to be true, and yet one can usually see why people have interpreted Spinoza’s heritage along these lines.” Piet Steenbakkers, Spinoza Research: To Be Continued (2016). Pg. 19. While writing my thesis I could not help but recall these words spoken by professor Steenbakkers in his farewell address, almost anticipating a project such as my own. The first Spinoza lecture I received was in 2009 (or 2010) and given by professor Steenbakkers when I was yet to become a student of philosophy. It seems only fitting that his words are at the beginning of the end of my philosophical path that as a circle begins and ends with Spinoza. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................. 4 I. Interpreting Scripture and Defending Freedom ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freeing Althusser from Spinoza
    C ABSTRACT: C R R I The concept of structural causality, associated with the work I S of Louis Althusser, was, one can say, short-lived: even its foremost S I I Freeing AlthusserS advocates seemed to drop it just about as quickly as they picked it up, S while other concepts in Althusser’s work continued to be popular. This & & paper proposes to discuss both the problems with and the merits of C C R the concept, calling particular attention to the philosophical work it R I was supposed to do, which was both critical and constructive, negative I from Spinoza: T T I and positive. Critical and negative in that it offered a way to avoid I Q both a naturalistic mechanism and a Hegelian expressivism. In other Q U U E words, it aimed to avoid both a naïve materialism and a naïve idealism. E Constructive and positive, in that it was contributing to a new picture of A Reconsidera- # # 3 the relationship between structure and what is structured, by trying to 3 give an account of the manner in which structure was present and “in the real”: and, I will add, thereby providing the groundwork for a better version of dialectical materialism. There is no doubt that Spinoza’s tion of Structural philosophy provided Althusser with the model for thinking of this form of causality. But the use of Spinoza as a model can also be identified as the source of many of the problems with the concept. An essay by Warren Montag dealing with an exchange between Althusser and Pierre Causality Macherey will serve as the basis for my discussion of Spinoza and structural causality.
    [Show full text]