DOCSLIB.ORG

Kierkegaard, Martensen, and the Meaning of Medieval Mysticism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kierkegaard, Martensen, and the Meaning of Medieval Mysticism KIERKEGAARD, MARTENSEN, AND THE MEANING OF MEDIEVAL MYSTICISM George Pattison University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK Abstract Although it is not known whether Kierkegaard read Martensen’s 1840 study on Meister Eckhart, this small book provides a useful point for identifying key issues in Kierkegaard’s relation to speculative idealism and mysticism. Following a summary of Martensen’s text, the article ar- gues that although Kierkegaard rejects speculative idealism’s reading of medieval mysticism, his own work reflects in devotional idiom some of the same themes we find in Eckhart and even, quite specifically, in Mar- tensen’s Eckhart. Key words: Speculative theology, mysticism, God, Martensen, Eckhart. Resumen Aunque no se sabe si Kierkegaard leyó el trabajo de Martensen de 1840 sobre Meister Eckhart, esta pequeña obra nos ofrece una herramienta útil para identificar planteamientos clave en la relación de Kierkegaard con el idealismo especulativo y el misticismo. Después de hacer un re- sumen del escrito de Martensen, el presente artículo sugiere que si bien Kierkegaard rechaza la interpretación del idealismo especulativo sobre el misticismo medieval, su propia obra refleja, en términos devocionales, algunos de los mismos temas que encontramos en Eckhart e incluso, de forma más específica, en el Eckhart de Martensen. Palabras clave: teología especulativa, misticismo, Dios, Martensen, Eckhart. I. Introduction It is now commonplace to note that Kierkegaard’s literary career in- volved a mildly obsessive rivalry with his five-year older contemporary Hans Lassen Martensen. Their paths were, it seems, destined to cross repeatedly from the time when Kierkegaard hired Martensen as a private tutor to work Estudios Kierkegaardianos. Revista de filosofía 3 (2017) 66 GEORGE PATTISON on Schleiermacher (1834), through his attendance at the lectures in which Martensen introduced Hegelianism into Danish theology (1837-8), through literary rivalry associated with the Heiberg circle (1837-40), right through to when Martensen became the prime target of Kierkegaard’s final ‘Attack on Christendom’ (1854-5). Throughout this time, it is clear that Kierkegaard closely tracked Martensen’s work—from this cry of misery over Martensen having published an article on Faust1 through to his outrage at Martensen’s memorial eulogy over Bishop Mynster in 1854. Yet he seems never to have explicitly commented on Martensen’s 1840 book Meister Eckhart: A Study in Speculative Theology.2 In fact, he seems never to have explicitly men- tioned Meister Eckhart at all, although it is clear that he read many works in which Eckhart is referred to and was certainly familiar with works strongly influenced by Eckhart including Johannes Tauler and Johann Arndt and there are passages in Kierkegaard’s devotional writings that to some extent converge with the kind of mystical themes associated. Did Martensen’s book and its subject, Eckhart, simply pass Kierke- gaard by, or is this work in some way reflected in the authorship, perhaps in a “silent way,” as Peter Šajda has argued? It seems implausible that Kierke- gaard didn’t know of Martensen’s book and improbable that he didn’t read it. In an intriguing essay Šajda suggests that the portrait of the aesthete “A” offered by Assessor Vilhelm in part reflects Martensen’s characterization of the mystic, as found in the book on Eckhart.3 This is not impossible. Yet in light of the growing awareness of significant commonalities between Kier- kegaard’s religious writings and the mystical tradition broadly understood as well as of the importance of the kind of speculative theology represented by Martensen, the book on Eckhart might seem to provide a useful point 1 Cfr., SKS 27, Papir 244 / JP 5, 5225. 2 An English translation is found in Thompson, C. L., and Kangas, D. (trans.), Be- tween Hegel and Kierkegaard. Hans L. Martensen’s Philosophy of Religion, Georgia: Schol- ars Press 1997, pp. 149-242. Further references will be given in the text as ME followed by page number. 3 Cfr., Peter Šajda, “Meister Eckhart: The Patriarch of German Speculation who was a Lebemeister: Meister Eckhart’s Silent Way into Kierkegaard’s Corpus” in Kierkegaard Research:Sources, Reception and Resources, Vol. 4: Kierkegaard and the Patristic and Medi- eval Traditions, ed. by Jon Stewart, Farnham: Ashgate 2008, pp. 237-53. Šajda also usefully sets Martensen’s Eckhart book in the context of contemporary speculative theology. Cfr., Peter Šajda, “Martensen’s Treatise Meister Eckhart and the Contemporary Philosophical- Theological Debate on Speculative Mysticism in Germany” in Hans Lassen Martensen. Theologian, Philosopher and Social Critic, ed. by Jon Stewart, Copenhagen: Museum Tus- culanum 2012, pp. 47-72. Estudios Kierkegaardianos. Revista de filosofía 3 (2017) KIERKEGAARD, MARTENSEN, AND THE MEANING OF MEDIEVAL MYSTICISM 67 of reference for teasing out new aspects of Kierkegaard’s relation to both mysticism and speculative theology. Kierkegaard indeed left no notes on the work, but it is by no means difficult to see how he might have responded to it and why his disagreement with Martensen might have led to his not pursuing Eckhart as a source of spiritual understanding, despite his interest in several of Eckhart’s followers. In this essay I shall therefore begin by offering a brief summary of Mar- tensen’s book in the overall context of early nineteenth-century receptions of Eckhart’s work; next, I shall consider how the book highlights aspects of Martensen’s thought that would especially have displeased Kierkegaard; and, finally, I shall consider how, nevertheless, it is not unreasonable to talk of an “Eckhartian” current in Kierkegaard’s work. This is not to argue that Eckhart really was a “hidden source” of Kierkegaard’s key religious ideas. Kierkegaard’s thought was an ocean criss-crossed by multiple currents and not all of them flowed in the same direction. To identify one of these many currents as “Eckhartian” is therefore no more than to observe one small part of a complex phenomenon—yet it is, I suggest, an important part. II. Martensen on Eckhart The history of publication of Martensen’s work itself has Kierkegaard- ian echoes in that it was originally conceived as a doctorate to be submit- ted for examination to Copenhagen University. Like Kierkegaard’s Concept of Irony, however, it was written in Danish, not Latin, and as Kierkegaard would do shortly afterwards, Martensen therefore had to petition the King to have it presented in Danish. In the event, however, he actually submitted it to Kiel University, so that the petition did not proceed. In English transla- tion the title appears as Meister Eckhart. A Study in Speculative Theology. This is certainly accurate as far as the content of the work goes, but (as the translators note in their Introduction) the literal translation of the sub-title is “A Contribution to illuminating the Mysticism of the Middle Ages.” And although Meister Eckhart is the main focus of the work, Martensen himself quickly makes clear that he will also be considering the continuation of the Eckhartian tradition in Tauler, Henry Suso, and the Theologica Germanica. Although works by Eckhart are now widely available in both scholarly and popular editions and selections and he is often seen as one of the repre- sentative figures of medieval thought and of Christian mysticism more gen- Estudios Kierkegaardianos. Revista de filosofía 3 (2017) 68 GEORGE PATTISON erally, his work and reputation only started to emerge from obscurity in the very late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Although some work by Eckhart had been mistakenly credited to Tauler or recycled in authors such as Arndt, allowing him to have had some unacknowledged influence, it was only with the Romantic return to the medieval past (a return coloured, in the case of Eckhart, by a certain nationalistic interest) that a significant body of texts became formally identified as genuinely Eckhartian. At the same time as the work of early Eckhart textual research, Eckhartian themes begin to be taken up by key thinkers of German Idealism, including J. G. Fichte, Franz von Baader (whose work Kierkegaard was reading in his stu- dent years), Hegel, and Schopenhauer. There was an explicit recognition that the kind of mystical vision articulated in Eckhart resonated with ideal- ism’s understanding of the divine-human relationship, a resonance summed up for Hegel in Eckhart’s line that “the eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me” (Hegel had in fact been introduced to Eckhart by von Baader).4 Now this may have involved a significant misread- ing of Eckhart’s own text, although it is not to the purpose of this article to pursue that issue further. Nevertheless, it is clear that by 1840 there was a widespread sense that Eckhart in some way anticipated the more fully de- veloped speculative theology developed in German Idealism. In the light of this situation, it would be easy to assume that Martensen (as Kierkegaard tends to depict him) was doing no more than popularizing others’ ideas. However, at the same time it should be said to Martensen’s credit that his was amongst the very first monographs to be dedicated to Eckhart’s work. Noting Kierkegaard’s aspersions, Cyril O’ Regan comments on Martensen’s work that, in comparison with Baader, his ‘reading of Eck- hart is by far the more focused, his method considerably more “scientific” (wissenschaftlich), and his ability to make distinctions between genres and levels of discourse much more developed’.5 O’Regan therefore sees Mar- tensen as a significant milestone in the reception of Eckhart in the nine- teenth century. Martensen himself was aware of the context in which he offered his ‘contribution’ and starts his study by locating the growing interest in Eck- 4 On German idealism as one of the sources for Kierkegaard’s knowledge of mysti- cism see Marie Mikulova Thulstrup, “Kierkegaards møde med mystik gennem den speku- lative idealismen,” Kierkegaardiana, X, 1977, pp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kierkegaard's Life and Works
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87703-9 - Kierkegaard: An Introduction C. Stephen Evans Excerpt More information chapter 1 Introduction: Kierkegaard’ s life and works Søren Kierkegaard is acknowledged to be one of the most influential thinkers of the nineteenth century. Born on May 5, 1813, in Copenhagen, where he spent almost all of his life, Kierkegaard was not widely known outside Scandinavia in his lifetime, and was not hugely popular even in Denmark. Most of his books were published in editions of 500 copies that never sold out prior to his death in 1855, at age 42. However, around the beginning of the twentieth century he exploded upon the European intellectual scene like a long-delayed time bomb, and his influence since 1 then has been incalculable. Although Kierkegaard was not widely read in the English-speaking world until the mid-twentieth century, his works are today translated into all major world languages and his impact is strongly felt in Asia and Latin America as well as in Europe and North America. is kierkegaard a philosopher? Kierkegaard’s influence is broad not only geographically but also intel- lectually. One could go so far as to call him “a man for all disciplines,” given his importance for theology, psychology, communications theory, literary theory, and even political and social theory, not to mention philosophy. Kierkegaard himself clearly wanted to be remembered pri- marily as a religious thinker. Indeed, he famously goes so far as to say that he was really a missionary, called not to introduce Christianity into a pagan country, but rather to “reintroduce Christianity into 1 For an interesting account of the early reception of Kierkegaard, and particularly how Kierkegaard became known outside of Denmark, see Habib Malik, Receiving Søren Kierkegaard: The Early Impact and Transmission of His Thought (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard
    Journal of Buddhist Ethics ISSN 1076-9005 http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/ Volume 22, 2015 A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard Mary Jeanne Larrabee DePaul University Copyright Notice: Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format, with the exception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author. All en- quiries to: [email protected]. A Love Knowing Nothing: Zen Meets Kierkegaard Mary Jeanne Larrabee 1 Abstract I present a case for a love that has a wisdom knowing nothing. How this nothing functions underlies what Kier- kegaard urges in Works of Love and how Zen compassion moves us to action. In each there is an ethical call to love in action. I investigate how Kierkegaard’s “religiousness B” is a “second immediacy” in relation to God, one spring- ing from a nothing between human and God. This imme- diacy clarifies what Kierkegaard takes to be the Christian call to love. I draw a parallel between Kierkegaard’s im- mediacy and the expression of immediacy within a Zen- influenced life, particularly the way in which it calls the Zen practitioner to act toward the specific needs of the person standing before one. In my understanding of both Kierkegaard and Zen life, there is also an ethics of re- sponse to the circumstances that put the person in need, such as entrenched poverty or other injustices. 1 Department of Philosophy, DePaul University. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Mikael Van Reis
    Nikolaj Bijleveld The Nationalization of Christianity. Theology and Nationalism in Nineteenth- Century Denmark n 1853 the Danish court chaplain Hans Lassen Martensen (1808-1884) wrote to a close friend and colleague the follow- I ing lines: pastors from Schleswig have confided to me, that they have been so involved in politics and language questions that by now they feel hollow and long for a return to theology and strictly religious duties.1 The quotation stems from a letter that had been written during Martensen’s vacation in the duchy of Schleswig, the region of his childhood. He was born in the major city Flensburg in 1808 of a German mother and a Danish-speaking father from Schleswig. The family moved to Copenhagen, where Martensen studied theology at the university. He continued his studies in Berlin and became a 1 H.L. Martensen, Biskop H. Martensens breve. Breve til L. Gude 1848-1859, Vol. 1 [B. Kornerup., ed.], (Copenhagen 1955), nr. 39, 28-7-1853, 87. [Præster have tilstaaet for mig, at de nu i lang Tid have været saaledes optagne af Politik og Sprogforhold, at de nu omsider begynde at føle sig aldeles tomme og trænge til at vende tilbage til Theologie og de reent religiøse Opgaver.] [Translations are by the author of this article] © TijdSchrift voor Skandinavistiek vol. 31 (2010), nr. 2 [ISSN: 0168-2148] 78 TijdSchrift voor Skandinavistiek professor of theology in Copenhagen in 1837. In 1845 he was ap- pointed court chaplain and was to succeed his mentor, the bishop J.P. Mynster (1775-1854), in 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • Ateísmo, Panteísmo, Acosmismo Y Monoteísmo En La Filosofía De Hegel | Javier Fabo Lanuza
    Ateísmo, panteísmo, acosmismo y monoteísmo en la filosofía de Hegel | Javier Fabo Lanuza Ateísmo, panteísmo, acosmismo y monoteísmo en la filosofía de Hegel (Comentario de un conocido pasaje sobre Spinoza) PhD. Javier Fabo Lanuza. Universidad Complutense de Madrid ([email protected]) Resumen Abstract Ateísmo y panteísmo son sistemáticamente Atheism, pantheism, acosmism and rechazados por Hegel a lo largo de su obra. monotheism in Hegel's philosophy Testimonio paradigmático de este rechazo es la (Commentary on a well-known Anm. del § 573 de la Enz., en la que el filósofo critica duramente el panteísmo, a la vez que se passage on Spinoza) desmarca netamente del ateísmo. Ello no ha impedido que los más afines a su filosofía Atheism and pantheism have been vieran en su crítica de la religión una systematically rejected by Hegel throughout his declaración de ateísmo, ni tampoco que su work. The Anm. of § 573 of the Enz. is a idealismo absoluto apareciera a ojos de los más paradigmatic testimony of this rejection, in críticos como una suerte de panteísmo which the philosopher strongly criticizes soterrado, sospechosamente afín a lo que Heine pantheism, and at the same time he clearly 267 llamaba «la religión secreta de Alemania». El distances himself from atheism. This has not Nº 101 propósito de este artículo es mostrar los prevented those closest to his philosophy from Julio-agosto 2021 malentendidos que subyacen a estas seeing in his critique of religion a declaration of interpretaciones, analizando los pasajes que atheism, nor has his absolute idealism appear to han contribuido a suscitarlas, de entre los que the most critical eyes as a kind of buried destaca el célebre elogio a Spinoza de las pantheism, suspiciously akin to what Heine Lecciones berlinesas, erróneamente tomado called «the secret religion of Germany».
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Philosophy Of
    L- ,o C| L> t ty- NUI MAYNOOTH Ollacali •• atiraann Wt Huad BOHM E AND HEGEL: A STUDY OF THEIR INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND SHARED READINGS OF TWO CHRISTIAN THEOLOGOUMENA NEIL O’DONNELL SUBMITTED WITH A VIEW TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF M.LITT. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, MAYNOOTH DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, FACULTY OF ARTS, CELTIC STUDIES, AND PHILOSOPHY OCTOBER 2008 ACTING HEAD OF DEPARTMENT DR MICHAEL DUNNE SUPERVISED BY DR CYRIL MCDONNELL CONTENTS Preface IV Abstract v Abbreviations and Conventions vii INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I THE DEVELOPMENT OF BÖHME AND HEGEL’S PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Section One Reaction Against Christian Orthodoxy 6 § 1. 1. The Development o f Böhme ’s Theological Vision in the Face o f Protestant Orthodoxy 7 § 1. 2. Hegel, Tübingen, and Protestant Orthodoxy 16 Section Two Heterodox Leanings 27 § 2. 1. Böhme ’s Period o f Silence and the Failure o f Hermeticism 28 § 2. 2. Hegel's Swabian Heritage 38 Section Three The Return to the Reformation 53 § 3. 1. Böhme ’s Return to the Reformation 54 § 3. 2. Hegel the Reformer? 68 § 3. 3. 1. Liberating Religion from Representation 76 CHAPTER II THE CONCEPT OF GOD 86 Section One The Father 91 § 1. 1. Böhme 's Conception o f the Deus Absconditus 96 § 1. 2. Hegel’s Treatment o f Böhme 's Trinitarian Dynamic 107 § 1. 3. H eg e l’s G od and its H istorical Traces 112 Section Two The Son 119 § 2. 1. The Personhood o f the Trinity 120 §2. 2. The Incarnation 130 Section Three The Holy Spirit 144 § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinoza's Acosmism in Another Light
    THE DAY IN WHICH ALL COWS ARE WHITE: SPINOZA’S ACOSMISM IN ANOTHER LIGHT Jason DOCKSTADER* Abstract. In this essay, I aim to defend Spinoza against Hegel’s claim that he annihilated finite things and the real differences they instantiate. To counter Hegel’s charge of acosmism, I try to conceive of a Spinozist kind of acosmism that would mean not a metaphysical eliminativism or nihilism about finitude and diversity, but rather a metaphysical fictionalism about finitude that entails a latent application of the principle of the discernibility of identicals. I do this by focusing on the correspondence between Spinoza’s three kinds of knowledge – imagination, intellection, and intuition – and his understanding of things as being finite, infinite in kind, and absolutely infinite. In the process, I also entertain Yitzhak Melamed’s argument that Hegel was wrong to accuse Spinoza of acosmism, but was onto something by noting the lack of full or self-subsistent existence on the part of finite modes. Melamed offers a reading that claims Spinozist individuals are weak and functional properties that follow from God as his effects. I respond that Melamed would be correct only if we view things from the perspective of the first kind of knowledge, which is a perspective that is by definition false. I conclude, then, that finite things in Spinoza, qua finite, are not illusions, but fictions, and that when viewed truly or truthfully they are so many infinite in kind or absolutely infinite ways one infinite and eternal substance, God or nature, is discernibly identical to itself. Keywords: Spinoza, Hegel, Acosmism, Discernibility, Infinite, Knowledge, Truth I.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Lassen Martensen's “The Present Religious Crisis”
    Jon Stewart Hans Lassen Martensen’s “The Present Religious Crisis” Abstract: Thisarticle provides an English translation of Hans Lassen Martensen’s “The Present Religious Crisis” from 1842. In this work Martensen outlines two importanttrends that weremuch discussed at the time. The first part of his article is dedicated to the Anabaptist movement in Denmark, which wasin open conflictwith the DanishStateChurch about the question of infant baptism. In the second part,Martensen treats the work of the left Hegelian David Friedrich Strauss and his followers,who regarded the gospel accounts of the life of Jesusas, by and large,myths. Although polar opposites,these two movements are, for Martensen, symptoms of the religious confusion of the day. Martensen attempts to defend the DanishState Church in the face of these criticisms. Kierkegaardseems to refertoMartensen’sarticle in his “Public Confession,” whereherefers to the rise of sects in Denmark and makes explicit referencetoboththe Anabaptists and the Straussians. Like Martensen, he is at painstodistance himself from Strauss and his followers. Martensen’sarticle also represents alandmark in the history of the Danish Hegel reception since it signals the alarm about the new Straussian trend. Hans Lassen Martensen is well known as the constant target of Kierkegaard’s critique.Hewas also an importantand influential figure in the Danish culturaland religious life of the day. On April 15,1842, he published an article in the Intelligensblade,the newlyinaugurated journaledited by his friend Johan Ludvig Heiberg. This article, entitled “The Present Religious Crisis,”¹ is sig- nificant for anumber of different reasons. By using the term “crisis” in the title, Martensen picks up on acentral motif of Heiberg’streatise from almostadecade earlier, On the Significance of Philos- ophyfor the Present Age.² In thatwork Heiberggives anegative diagnosis of his Hans Lassen Martensen, “Nutidens religiøse Crisis,” Intelligensblade,vol.
    [Show full text]
  • ART4 Dial107articulomiguelbadia Reveh8dec2020
    HEGEL’S APPROACH TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD IN THE LECTURES ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Miguel A. Badía Cabrera Universidad de Puerto Rico [email protected] Resumen: Con las Lecciones sobre la filosofía de la religión Hegel muy probablemente se convierte no sólo en un predecesor, sino en el fundador de la filosofía de la religión contemporánea. Esto es así porque en esta obra esboza un acercamiento original al conocimiento de Dios. Cuando Hegel dilucida el concepto de religión como la “consciencia” (Bewusstsein), y en especial la “ocupación” (Beschäftigung) del ser humano con Dios, diferencia la perspectiva objetiva de la teología natural del punto de vista doblemente subjetivo de la filosofía de la religión. Mientras que en la primera disciplina Dios es aprehendido como un objeto “abstracto” del pensamiento —Dios como meramente es en sí mismo—, en la segunda conocer a Dios es primariamente percatarse de él como un sujeto “concreto” que aparece a los sujetos que nosotros somos, ya que “El Espíritu de Dios es esencialmente en su comunidad”. El énfasis de Hegel en “esta esfera íntima” (dies Innerste) ejemplariza un enfoque análogo al de pensadores medulares del siglo veinte quienes, a partir de tradiciones filosóficas diferentes, aseveran que el conocimiento de Dios hay que sacarlo de adentro. Palabras clave: Hegel, filosofía de la religión, Dios, religión, Espíritu, Innerste, Unamuno Abstract: With the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Hegel arguably becomes not just a forerunner, but the founder of contemporary philosophy of religion. This is because in this work he delineates an original approach to the knowledge of God.
    [Show full text]
  • QUADERNI Del Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi
    QUADERNI del Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi LETTERATURA DANESE A cura di Simona Cappellari e Giorgio Colombo Guest editor Bruno Berni Quaderni del Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi Pubblicazione dell’Associazione Giuseppe Acerbi XXVII edizione - Letteratura danese numero 19 anno 2019 Presidente del Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi Direttori scientifici Achille Prignaca Giorgio Colombo Simona Cappellari Giuria scientifica Francesca Romana Paci, Presidente Direttore responsabile Anna Casella Paltrinieri Stefano Iori Antonio Castorina Giorgio Colombo Comitato di redazione Edgarda Ferri Giorgio Colombo, Direttore Lauri Lindgren Emanuel Ballasina Marco Lunghi Simona Cappellari Bruno Mazzoni Ola Catulini Roberto Navarrini Rosanna Colognesi Maurizio Rizzini Arminda Redini Luigi Tassoni Tiziana Rodella Eva Serafini Danesi Consulente d’area Bianca Maria Telò Bruno Berni Ester Varini Segreteria di redazione Presso la Biblioteca comunale di Castel Goffredo Piazza Matteotti, 7 46042 Castel Goffredo (MN) Tel. 0376 780161 - Fax 0376 777227 e-mail: [email protected] Associazione Giuseppe Acerbi Consiglio Direttivo Piero Gualtierotti / Simona Cappellari, Presidente Ola Catulini, Vice Presidente Tiziana Rodella, Rappresentante del Comune Emanuel Ballasina Carla Casella Eva Serafini Danesi Bianca Maria Telò Ester Varini Segretario del Premio e dell’Associazione Giuseppe Acerbi Rosanna Colognesi /Annibale Vareschi Autorizzazione del tribunale di Mantova n. 10 del 25/09/2005 Stampa: Tipolitografia Soldini - Carpenedolo
    [Show full text]
  • Māyā and Becoming: Deleuze and Vedānta on Attributes, Acosmism
    COMPARATIVE AND CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2018.1488354 Māyā and Becoming: Deleuze and Vedānta on Attributes, Acosmism, and Parallelism in Spinoza Michael Hemmingsen Division of Humanities, College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences, University of Guam, Guam, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This paper compares two readings of Baruch Spinoza – those of Deleuze; Vedānta; Spinoza; Gilles Deleuze and Rama Kanta Tripathi – with a particular focus māyā; becoming on three features of Spinoza’s philosophy: the relationship between substance and attribute; the problem of acosmism and unity; and the problem of the parallelism of attributes. Deleuze and Tripathi’s understanding of these three issues in Spinoza’s thought illustrates for us their own concerns with becoming over substance (in the non-Spinozistic sense) and māyā, respectively. This investigation provides not just two interesting and contradictory interpretations of Spinoza, but also gives us insight into Deleuze’s metaphysics and Tripathi’s Vedāntic philosophy. Interpreting historical thinkers often brings with it the concerns and preconceptions of those engaged in the reading. As such, in considering the views of later interpreters of a philosopher or philosophy, we can sometimes learn just as much about the views of those doing the interpreting as we can about the “correct” way of reading the original phi- losopher. A good example of this appears in contemporary readings of Baruch Spinoza. In this paper, I look at Spinoza through the eyes of Gilles Deleuze and Rama Kanta Tripathi. Their interpretations of Spinoza help to illuminate some of the concerns and presupposi- tions in their own thought and help us further understand their own philosophical pos- itions.
    [Show full text]
  • Konturen VII (2015) 42 42 the Stillness of History: Kierkegaard
    Konturen VII (2015) 42 The Stillness of History: Kierkegaard and German Mysticism M.G. Piety Drexel University The German mystics were particularly important for Kierkegaard because of the proximity of Germany to Denmark and because of their influence on both German idealism and the Pietist tradition in which Kierkegaard was raised. This article is the first attempt to look at the issue of how the views of the German mystics may have influenced Kierkegaard’s though. It begins with an introduction to what one could call mystical epistemology, but then looks more specifically at the epistemology of two medieval German mystics, Meister Eckhart and Johannes Tauler, and at Kierkegaard’s exposure to the German mystical tradition. Finally, it presents an account of Kierkegaard’s own religious epistemology that makes clear that it is largely indistinguishable from the epistemology of Ekhardt and Tauler. M.G. Piety has published numerous scholarly articles in professional journals and books as well as popular articles and essays both online and in the Times Literary Supplement. Her translations of Søren Kierkegaard’s Repetition and Philosophical Crumbs for Oxford University Press appeared in 2009 and her book Ways of Knowing: Kierkegaard’s Pluralist Epistemology was published by Baylor University Press in 2010. She is currently working on a book for Gegensatz Press entitled Fear and Dissembling: The Copenhagen Kierkegaard Controversy. Piety is also a frequent contributor to the online political journal CounterPunch Introduction “Danish civilization,” writes Thorleifr Gudmunson Repp in 1845, in the preface to the first lexicographically defensible Danish-English Dictionary, is in fact in every particular essentially German, and Denmark has for ages become so much accustomed to German dictature and supremacy in intellectual matters, that an emancipation from it would be suicidal to Danish culture and entirely check the progress of enlightenment in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Søren Kierkegaard Newsletter 51
    S み re 癒湖ダ 八寸メ，比ぱNC alio 0ダ マ L ノ 寸 )皿rd 0 乃lC Icnc ノ NUMBER 51: APRIL 2007 Contents Pa g24 EONA HATLESTAD HONG, 1913-2007 ANNOUNCEMENTS AND NEWS FirstJu]iaw 且十 山ト MemorI41Lecture RObe ぱ L ， perkins 11 "On Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks: Remarks at the Celebration at Scandinavia House, New York City, February 1,2007" Brace H. Kirmmse 20 ARTICLES Expiring in the Mirror of the Word: Reflections on Kierkegaard's For Self-Examination Cameron Thomson 24 Repetition qua 'double contemporaneity':God-man and the Single Individual Vasiliki Tsakiri 33 REVIEWS よ on Stewaれ，ばがみ e 格 7s0 打ズ・ J@gS な 八双が Cd 八乙 e oグ P 方 iJo$opAノftfo 「 m片 e pxg$eガクメ ge 4 打イO マわ erTcTts a 乃 d He グ Ac7 勺 SpPeculo廿 tJvve Logic and Oィ herTzxts わノ Inger ChrjSt 付丸sen イ， Editor; Gordon 0. Marino Associate Editors: John Poting, Lise Faillesttaz, and David D. Possen Assistant Editor: Cynthia Wales Lund Managing Editor: Cleo N. Granneman EDNA HATLESTAD HONG 1913-2007 EdnaHong died of congestive heart failure on April 3,2007, at her home on Heath Creek, west OfNo 而比 ]d@MinneSotaJShewめ !94.PaStorMarkDI 血川 %n wQ 比ぬ 川 d の ndu 山e e 司 serviCefor hen,wIth PaStor 5ほ n G %Si5血乙如 THがり Lu 山 HO司川山 e5o叫 on April 5, 2007, Maundy Thursday. She was buriedin the Old Cemetery of Trinity, a church and cemetery near both Lake Superior and the place in the woods where she and her family lived in the summer since 1945. Pastor Oitmansonalso conducted the graveside service.
    [Show full text]