DOCSLIB.ORG

Securing Tyrants Or Fostering Reform?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Securing Tyrants Or Fostering Reform? THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Securingor Tyrants Fostering Reform? U.S. Internal Security Assistance to Repressive and Transitioning Regimes Seth G. Jones, Olga Oliker, Peter Chalk, C. Christine Fair, Rollie Lal, James Dobbins Prepared for the Open Society Institute Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION The research described in this report was sponsored by the Open Society Institute and was conducted under the auspices of the International Security and Defense Policy Center within the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD). NSRD conducts research and analysis for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Commands, the defense agencies, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Intelligence Community, allied foreign governments, and foundations. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN 978-0-8330-4018-3 Cover Photo by U.S. Army Cpl. Thomas Childs The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2006 RAND Corporation All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2006 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface The United States has historically provided assistance to the security forces of repressive, non-democratic countries that do not share its political ideals. This assistance is intended to improve their ability to deal with threats such as terrorism and perhaps to improve human rights. The security forces in these countries are not accountable to the public, and their activities and approaches are not transparent. This practice of providing assistance to repressive states raises a number of questions, the answers to which have significant policy implications. Has U.S. assistance improved the effectiveness of internal security agencies in countering security threats? Has U.S. assistance improved the accountability and human rights records of these agencies? What is the relationship between improving security and improving accountabil- ity and human rights? This study seeks some answers to these questions. The research was funded by the Open Society Institute and was con- ducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND Corporation’s National Security Research Division (NSRD). NSRD conducts research and analysis for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the defense agencies, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the U.S. CoastGuard, the U.S. Intelligence Community, allied foreign governments, and foun- dations. For more information on RAND’s International Security and Defense Policy Center, contact the Director, James Dobbins. He can be reached by email at [email protected]; by phone at 703-413-1100, extension 5134; or by mail at the RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, Virginia 22202. More information about RAND is available at www.rand.org. iii Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures .............................................................................vii Tables .............................................................................. ix Summary .......................................................................... xi Acknowledgments ............................................................ xxiii Abbreviations ................................................................... xxv CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO Historical Context................................................................ 9 CHAPTER THREE El Salvador ....................................................................... 23 CHAPTER FOUR Uzbekistan ........................................................................49 CHAPTER FIVE Afghanistan.......................................................................89 CHAPTER SIX Pakistan ......................................................................... 125 CHAPTER SEVEN Conclusion ...................................................................... 161 v vi Securing Tyrants or Fostering Reform? APPENDIX Training Assistance Provided to Uzbekistan, January 2001–June 2005 ................................................. 175 Bibliography .................................................................... 181 Figures 1.1. Relative Change in Effectiveness of Internal Security Forces After U.S. Assistance...................................................... 5 1.2. Relative Change in Accountability and Human Rights Practices of Internal Security Forces After U.S. Assistance .......... 5 3.1. Homicides in El Salvador, 1992–2002 ............................... 38 3.2. Public Perception of Political, Civil, and Human Rights Practices in Six Countries .............................................. 42 3.3. Public Perception of Corruption in Six Countries .................. 44 5.1. Insurgent Targets in Afghanistan, 2002–2006...................... 94 5.2. Number of Insurgent Attacks in Afghanistan, January 2002–December 2005....................................... 105 5.3. Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan, 1986–2006........... 110 5.4. Public Perception of the Rule of Law ................................ 112 5.5. Public Perception of Political, Civil, and Human Rights ......... 117 5.6. Public Perception of Corruption ..................................... 118 vii Tables 1.1. Overview of Case Studies ................................................ 3 2.1. U.S. Antiterrorism Assistance to Non-Democratic States...........17 3.1. Courses Provided to Salvadoran Security Forces, 1988–1993 ..... 28 ix Summary This report examines U.S. government assistance to the police and inter- nal security agencies of repressive and transitioning states. Throughout its history, the United States has provided assistance to a number of countries that have not shared its political ideals. Their security forces were not accountable to the public, and their practices and approaches were not transparent. The decision to provide assistance to repressive and autocratic states (and states that are, to varying extents, seeking to transition away from repression) raises a number of questions, the answers to which have significant policy implications. Can U.S. assis- tance improve the effectiveness of internal security agencies in counter- ing security threats? Has U.S. assistance improved the accountability and human rights records of these agencies? What is the relationship between improving security and improving accountability and human rights? We believe that security, human rights, and accountability are deeply interconnected. We disagree with those who argue that security interests should trump human rights in situations where states face significant security threats, such as terrorism. We also disagree with those who argue that the United States should never provide inter- nal security assistance to repressive states. Our analysis suggests that U.S. efforts to improve the security, human rights, and accountability of repressive internal security forces are often more likely to be suc- cessful when states are in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Detainee Assessment
    S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330609 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO U.S. NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA APO AE 09360 JTF-GTMO-CDR 9 June 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, United States Southern Command, 3511 NW 9lst Avenue, Miami, FL 33172 SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN US9PK-001460DP (S) JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment 1. (S//NF) Personal Information: ○ JDIMS/NDRC Reference Name: Abdul Rabbani Abu Rahman ○ Current/True Name and Aliases: Abdul Rahim Gulam Rabbani, Abu Rahim Moulana Gulam Rabbani, Khalid al- Pakistan, Sayyid Amin, Abu Rahama ○ Place of Birth: Mecca, Saudi Arabia (SA) ○ Date of Birth: 1969 ○ Citizenship: Pakistan (PK) ○ Internment Serial Number (ISN): US9PK-00001460DP 2. (U//FOUO) Health: Detainee is in overall good health. 3. (U) JTF-GTMO Assessment: a. (S) Recommendation: JTF-GTMO recommends this detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD). JTF-GTMO previously recommended detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) on 9 August 2007. b. (S//NF) Executive Summary: Detainee admitted working directly for Khalid Shaykh Muhammad, ISN US9KU-010024DP (KU-10024), as an al-Qaida facilitator from early 2000 to September 2002. Detainee’s duties included managing several Karachi, Pakistan (PK),safe houses. Detainee had direct access with many high-level al-Qaida members, CLASSIFIED BY: MULTIPLE SOURCES REASON: E.O. 12958, AS AMENDED, SECTION 1.4(C) DECLASSIFY ON: 20330609 S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330609 Downloaded from The Rendition Project www.therenditionproject.org.uk Source: the New York Times S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330609 JTF-GTMO-CDR SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN US9PK-001460DP (S) including Usama Bin Laden (UBL); Ayman al-Zawahiri; Muhammad Atef, aka (Abu Hafs al-Masri); and Nashwan Abd al-Razzaq Abd al-Baqi, aka (Abdul Hadi al-Iraqi), ISN US9IZ- 010026DP (IZ-10026).
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗
    Between Minimum Force and Maximum Violence: Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗ Introduction: Balancing the Tools of Counter-Terrorism In most liberal democratic states it is the responsibility of the police forces to cope with “internal” threats, including terrorism, since in such states terrorism is invariably defined as a criminal act rather than a manifestation of insurgent political violence. In many such instances, the resultant quantitative and qualitative overtaxing of law en- forcement capabilities to keep the peace has led to calls by sections of the public, as well as by the legislative and executive branches of government, to expand both the le- gal and operational means available to combat terrorism, and to boost civilian agen- cies’ capacity to deal with terrorism in proportion to the perceived threat. The deterio- rating situation in Ulster in Northern Ireland between 1968 and 1972 and beyond is an illustrative case in point.1 Although there have been cases of successfully transmogrifying police forces into military-like formations, the best-known and arguably most frequent example of aug- mented state responses to the threat posed by insurgent political violence movements is the use of the military in the fight against terrorism and in the maintenance of internal security. While it is imperative that the threat of a collapse of national cohesion due to the overextension of internal civil security forces be averted, the deployment of all branches of the armed forces against a terrorist threat is not without its own pitfalls. Paul Wilkinson has enunciated some of the problems posed by the use of counter-ter- rorism military task forces, not the least of which is that [a] fully militarized response implies the complete suspension of the civilian legal system and its replacement by martial law, summary punishments, the imposition of curfews, military censorship and extensive infringements of normal civil liberties in the name of the exigencies of war.
    [Show full text]
  • 209E7a36e95cfc54395aebf73c1
    \\server05\productn\G\GHS\5-1\GHS103.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-MAY-07 7:54 Where Do Universal Human Rights Begin? The following talk was given by George Critchlow on April 25, 2006 at Temple Beth Shalom in Spokane, Washington in honor of Yom Hashoah, the annual remembrance of the Holocaust. Critchlow, an associate pro- fessor at Gonzaga University School of Law and a founder and former director of the Gonzaga Institute for Action Against Hate, was selected by the congregation to represent the “righteous gentile.” Professor Critchlow would like to acknowledge the helpful ideas and background information presented at the Amnesty International USA Lawyers’ Conference at the University of Washington School of Law on February 17-18, 2006. In particular, he was inspired by John Shattuck’s presentation titled “The Legacy of Nuremberg: Confronting Genocide and Terrorism Through the Rule of Law.” I have enormous respect for Temple Beth Shalom, what it stands for, its congregation, and those individuals whom I have come to know and count as friends. I am deeply honored and privileged to be invited to speak to you on this Day of Remembrance–especially in light of the occasion to recognize the 60 years that have now passed since the establishment of a new rule of law and accountability regarding war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal in 1946. I have a poster hanging in my office that frequently catches my eye and reminds me to connect my heart with my head. It is a picture of a small child of uncertain ethnicity, running happily, arms out, into the smiling face and open arms of his mother.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFICKING in PERSONS 2020 COUNTRY PROFILE North Africa and the Middle East Table of Contents − Algeria −
    GLOBAL REPORT ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS 2020 COUNTRY PROFILE North Africa and the Middle East Table of Contents − Algeria − ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 − Bahrain − .................................................................................................................................................... 5 − Egypt − ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 − Iraq − ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 − Israel − ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 − Jordan − .................................................................................................................................................... 17 − The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia − ................................................................................................................ 18 − Kuwait − .................................................................................................................................................... 20 − Lebanon − ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Security Forces
    Lebanese Republic Ministry of Interior and Municipalities Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces Internal Security Forces Code of Conduct All rights reserved – Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces © 2011. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces. www.isf.gov.lb Foreword by the Minister of Interior and Municipalities From the moment I assumed my responsibilities as Minister of Interior and Municipalities, and throughout my years of military service within the Internal Security Forces (ISF), my foremost concerns were, and continue to be, the enforcement of the law, the maintenance of public order, the reinforcement of security, the preservation of rights and the protection of freedoms. Creating a safe and stable society with decreasing crime rates is dependent on building certain material and ethical pillars. This will reassure the people that they live in an environment where their citizenship is respected, their rights are safeguarded and their dignity is preserved. In a groundbreaking step forward, the Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces is introducing an exhaustive Code of Conduct for its members, laying out their rights and obligations and the way they should interact with the public, authorities, and institutions. This is a pioneering accomplishment and a worthy model for Lebanon and the world as the Code of Conduct establishes institutional, ethical and professional ground rules observing national legislation and international conventions and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Structure of Police and Internal Security Forces in Uganda Nagujja Zam Zam
    Third World Legal Studies Volume 14 The Governance of Internal Security Forces Article 6 in Sub-Saharan Africa 1-6-1997 Human Rights and Structure of Police and Internal Security Forces in Uganda Nagujja Zam Zam Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls Recommended Citation Zam Zam, Nagujja (1997) "Human Rights and Structure of Police and Internal Security Forces in Uganda," Third World Legal Studies: Vol. 14, Article 6. Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol14/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Third World Legal Studies by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AND STRUCTURE OF POLICE AND INTERNAL SECURITY FORCES IN UGANDA Nagujja Zam Zam I. BACKGROUND Uganda, like many African countries in the pre-colonial era, was a multiplicity of small kingdoms, chiefdoms and tribal societies. The primary interest of these peoples was subsistence. Criminal justice was maintained by kinship and the ultimate right to seek vengeance through the blood feud. There was a large degree of stability without a central authority, and in the 1870s a rudimentary criminal justice system existed. Punishment of breaches of peace was based on individual action rather than an established authority, except in the kingdoms of Buganda and Bunyoro-Kitara which had a more institutionalised set up. In the Buganda, each kingdom had its "army" for protection and expansion of the kingdom through tribal wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Anti-Semitism: Select Incidents in 2019
    Global Anti-Semitism: Select Incidents in 2019 DecemberDecemberDecemberDecember Argentina San Juan: Escuela Modelo de San Juan students reportedly made a Nazi-themed school project parodying Aqua’s “Barbie Girl” song. The school dismissed the teacher and had students study anti-Semitism in response Canada Montreal: A Jewish student at McGill University faced pressure to resign from her student government position for accepting Hillel Montreal’s invitation to travel to Israel and the West Bank. The Student Society of McGill University Board of Directors rejected the society’s legislative council’s motion calling for the student’s resignation. France Paris: An Israeli student was beaten unconscious on the subway for allegedly speaking Hebrew on his phone. Westhoffen: Over 100 graves were found covered with swastikas and anti-Semitic graffiti at a Jewish cemetery. Germany Berlin: A teenage student was allegedly strangled by three peers while they yelled anti-Semitic abuse at him. Ukraine 1 / 14 Kyiv: A statue of Sholem Aleichem, a leading Yiddish author and playwright was vandalized with swastikas. ADL commended the Ukrainian government’s immediate condemnation of the incident. United Kingdom London: A rabbi was hospitalized after reportedly being attacked over Shabbat by two teenagers who yelled “Kill Jews” and other anti-Semitic remarks. November Argentina Buenos Aires: A Swastika was painted in a bathroom stall at the Law School in Buenos Aires with the message, “Out with the Jews.” Canada Toronto: The University of Toronto Graduate Students’ Union apologized for linking positions on Israel to a Jewish student’s request to bring kosher food options to campus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Security Forces (I.S.F) in Lebanon Their Creation – History- Development
    The Internal Security Forces (I.S.F) in Lebanon Their creation – History- Development First : The creation of the I.S.F. Lebanon did not know a police organization, in the modern and legal meaning, before the creation of a lebanese gendarmerie by virtue of protocol 1861. Before this year, the Lebanese Emirs, with the help of their armed men, were in charge of policing, law enforcement and tax-collect. We will present hereunder a summary concerning the creation of the I.S.F. 1- The mandate of Emir Fakhreddine II (He came to power in 1589): The Emir Fakhreddine II is considered to be the founder of the modern Lebanese state. After a perturbated childhood, he came to power in 1589 and started instantly working for the unification of the country, by destroying some independent ephemeral Lebanese families, who were dissenters. In order to control policing and for the execution of ordinary police missions, the Emir has created a group of armed men, named “Zelems” i.e. direct servants. There were also another little groups of “Zelems” for feudal lords. If internal disorders became alarming and threatening the total security of the country, the Emir did not hesitate to ask help from his professional elements “The Sikmans”, who were foreign mercenaries. Nevertheless, he avoided the participation of “Bedouins”, used to theft and murders, instead of military actions. 2- The mandate of Emir Bechir II (He came to power in 1788) There were two kinds of military elements for policing: the first are “Cavaliers” of Emir Bechir the great and “Tax Collector” or “Hawalie” whose functions were as gendarmes, threatening evildoers.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Fall 2014 Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Terry, Carl Dwain, "Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice" (2014). All Regis University Theses. 216. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/216 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University College for Professional Studies Graduate Programs Final Project/Thesis Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • DETAINEE FACT SHEET: Abdul Hadi Al Iraqi/Nashwan Al Tamir Born in February 1961 in Mosul, Iraq
    The Librarian as Watchdog: One Librarian’s Experiences as an International Observer at Guantánamo Larissa Sullivant, [email protected] DETAINEE FACT SHEET: Abdul Hadi al Iraqi/Nashwan al Tamir Born in February 1961 in Mosul, Iraq. Fled Iraq for Afghanistan after Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait. Has an Afghan wife, 4 children in his adopted homeland of Afghanistan, and family back in Iraq. Captured in Turkey in October 2006 by CIA. Held for 170 days by the CIA at an unidentified cite; allegedly was not subjected to the Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. Brought to Guantánamo in April 2007. The only known professionally trained soldier (in Saddam Hussein’s army) to go before the Military Commissions. Charged in June 2014 with denying quarter, attacking protected property, using treachery or perfidy in a series of attacks in Afghanistan and Pakistan between about 2003 and 2004; if convicted, could face life in prison. Has had 5 surgeries for degenerative disc disease since September 2017 and suffers from chronic back pain and muscle spasms as a result. Hadi is currently held with the 15 other 'High Value Detainees' at Camp 7, the location of which remains top secret. He has two cells there; one has been adapted to meet his medical needs, the other is unmodified. Hadi’s defense team has changed five times. At the time of my visit to Guantánamo, Hadi’s defense team was Pentagon-paid defense attorneys Susan Hensler, Lt Charles D. Ball III, and Lt Dahoud A. Askar. The judges presiding over his court proceedings have changes three times. His trial has been scheduled to begin in February 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Victimization Policies & Practices
    EUROPEAN CRIME PREVENTION NETWORK EUCPN Toolbox Series No. 7 Preventing Secondary Victimization policies & practices In the framework of the project ‘‘The development of the observatory function of the European Centre of Expertise on Crime Prevention within the EUCPN’. EUCPN Secretariat, March 2016, Brussels With financial support from the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme of the European Union European Commission – Directorate-General Home Affairs Preventing Secondary Victimization Policies & practices Preface The seventh toolbox in the series published by the EUCPN Secretariat focuses on the topic chosen by the Latvian presidency, namely Secondary Victimization. In recent years the Latvian police has taking huge steps in making the police officers aware of the phenomena and providing them with a guideline in how to prevent Secondary Victimization. They wanted to share the knowledge of this experience with the other Member States of the network and see if there were other good practices that they could use. The toolbox is divided into three parts: policy and legislation, a guideline of good and promising practices and examples from practices. All 3 parts of the toolbox are important however the most emphasis is put on the second part. Within this part of the toolbox, the focus is on the different steps of the justice system a victim has to go through. The EUCPN Secretariat made a ‘matrix’ which shows the different steps of the justice system. For each step in the judicial system, we have tried to formulate the most pressing needs of the victims, the EU minimal standards provided through the legislations discussed in part 1 and we have also formulated good practices gathered in the Member States.
    [Show full text]