An Arctic Engineer's Story 1971 to 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix A. Survival Strategies of the Ecotonal Species
Appendix A. Survival Strategies of the Ecotonal Species With greater numbers of species found in relatively high abundance in communities of both the boreal zone and the arctic regions, with fewer in the forest-tundra ecotonal communities, the question arises as to the strategies involved that permit adaptations to disparate environments yet prohibit all but a few from surviving in the ecotone, at least in numbers sufficient so they are recorded in quadrats of the size employed in transects of this study. There is a depauperate zone in the forest-tundra ecotone marked by a paucity of species, a zone in which only a relatively few wide-ranging species are persistently dominant (see Tables 5.1-5.9). Plant communities in both the forests to the south and the tundra to the north possess more species of sufficient abundance to show up in the transects. In the depauperate zone, there is no lack of vegetational cover over the landscape, but fewer species in total dominate the communities. There are fewer species demonstrating intermediate abundance, fewer rare species. The obvious question is, "Why should this be so?" As yet, there is perhaps no fully satisfactory answer, but there have been studies that at least seem to point the way for an approach to the question. Studies of the survival and reproductive strategies oftundra plants, arctic and alpine, have a long history, and these are thoroughly discussed in classic papers and reviews by Britton (1957), Jeffree (1960), Warren Wilson (1957a,b, 1966a,b, 1967), Johnson et al. (1966), Johnson and Packer (1967), Billings and Mooney (1968), Bliss (1956, 1958, 1962, 1971), Billings (1974), and Wiclgolaski et al. -
Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene -
The Oil Boom After Spindletop
425 11/18/02 10:41 AM Page 420 Why It Matters Now The Oil Boom Petroleum refining became the 2 leading Texas industry, and oil remains important in the Texas After Spindletop economy today. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA boomtown, refinery, Humble 1. Analyze the effects of scientific discov- After Spindletop, the race was on to Oil and Refining Company, eries and technological advances on the discover oil in other parts of Texas. wildcatter, oil strike, oil and gas industry. In just 30 years, wells in all regions Columbus M. “Dad” Joiner, 2. Explain how C. M. “Dad” Joiner’s work of the state made Texas the world hot oil affected Texas. leader in oil production. 3. Trace the boom-and-bust cycle of oil and gas during the 1920s and 1930s. With the discovery of oil at Spindletop, thousands of fortune seekers flooded into Texas, turning small towns into overcrowded cities almost overnight. An oil worker’s wife described life in East Texas in 1931. There were people living in tents with children. There were a lot of them that had these great big old cardboard boxes draped around trees, living under the trees. And any- and everywhere in the world they could live, they lived. Some were just living in their cars, and a truck if they had a truck. And I tell you, that was bad. Just no place to stay whatsoever. Mary Rogers, interview in Life in the Oil Fields Oil, Oil Everywhere The oil boom of the 1920s and 1930s caused sudden, tremendous growth in Texas. -
Canada Topographical
University of Waikato Library: Map Collection Canada: topographical maps 1: 250,000 The Map Collection of the University of Waikato Library contains a comprehensive collection of maps from around the world with detailed coverage of New Zealand and the Pacific : Editions are first unless stated. These maps are held in storage on Level 1 Please ask a librarian if you would like to use one: Coverage of Canadian Provinces Province Covered by sectors On pages Alberta 72-74 and 82-84 pp. 14, 16 British Columbia 82-83, 92-94, 102-104 and 114 pp. 16-20 Manitoba 52-54 and 62-64 pp. 10, 12 New Brunswick 21 and 22 p. 3 Newfoundland and Labrador 01-02, 11, 13-14 and 23-25) pp. 1-4 Northwest Territories 65-66, 75-79, 85-89, 95-99 and 105-107) pp. 12-21 Nova Scotia 11 and 20-210) pp. 2-3 Nunavut 15-16, 25-27, 29, 35-39, 45-49, 55-59, 65-69, 76-79, pp. 3-7, 9-13, 86-87, 120, 340 and 560 15, 21 Ontario 30-32, 40-44 and 52-54 pp. 5, 6, 8-10 Prince Edward Island 11 and 21 p. 2 Quebec 11-14, 21-25 and 31-35 pp. 2-7 Saskatchewan 62-63 and 72-74 pp. 12, 14 Yukon 95,105-106 and 115-117 pp. 18, 20-21 The sector numbers begin in the southeast of Canada: They proceed west and north. 001 Newfoundland 001K Trepassey 3rd ed. 1989 001L St: Lawrence 4th ed. 1989 001M Belleoram 3rd ed. -
Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenario for Oil and Gas Activities
Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenario for Oil and Gas Activities National Forests and Grasslands in Texas National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Grasslands and Forests National Prepared for the U.S. Forest Service by Kelsey Crocker and James F. Glover United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management New Mexico State Office Final Report Amended November 2018 Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenario for Oil and Gas Activities National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Prepared By: ___________________________ ___________________________ Kelsey Crocker, GIS Specialist James F. Glover, Geologist United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management New Mexico State Office FINAL REPORT – AMENDED NOVEMBER 2018 RFD Scenario for Oil and Gas Activities—National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Guidance and Data Sources ........................................................................................................ 2 Assumptions and Findings .......................................................................................................... 3 Historical Activity ......................................................................................................................... 4 Recent Drilling Activity ............................................................................................................... 4 Oil and Gas Production -
Final Report Small Producers Program
RPSEA Final Report Small Producers Program Development Strategies for Maximizing East Texas Oil Field Production Contract No. 08123-16 July 15, 2014 Fred P. Wang Research Scientist Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences 10100 Burnet Rd., Bldg. #130, Austin, TX 78750 LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared by the Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, as an account of work sponsored by the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America, RPSEA. Neither RPSEA, members of RPSEA, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, the U.S. Department of Energy, nor any person acting on behalf of any of the entities: a. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, OR THAT THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT INFRINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, OR b. ASSUMES ANY LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF, OR FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE USE OF, ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT. THIS IS A FINAL REPORT. THE DATA, CALCULATIONS, INFORMATION, CONCLUSIONS, AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS REPORTED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. REFERENCE TO TRADE NAMES OR SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, COMMODITIES, OR SERVICES IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT REPRESENT OR CONSTITUTE AN ENDORSEMENT, RECOMMENDATION, OR FAVORING BY RPSEA OR ITS CONTRACTORS OF THE SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL PRODUCT, COMMODITY, OR SERVICE. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ABSTRACT The goals of this project were to evaluate deepening and behind-pipe opportunities and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) potentials to maximize recovery from the East Texas Oil Field (ETOF), a giant mature and marginal field currently operated by 114 small producers. -
For Personal Use Only Use Personal For
ABN 45 066 383 971 5 June 2015 PAGES (including this page):3 ASX Market Announcements CUE ENERGY OVERVIEW Cue is an Australian based oil & gas ASX Limited company with activities in Australia, Exchange Centre New Zealand and Indonesia. Level 4, 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000 THE COMPANY HAS: Long life production A strong balance sheet An active exploration program Cue acquires US conventional onshore oil CUE ENERGY DIRECTORS Geoffrey King (Chairman) Attached please find Cue Energy Resources Limited’s release with Stuart Brown respect to the above mentioned. Paul Foley Peter Hazledine Yours faithfully Brian Smith Andrew Young CUE ENERGY MANAGEMENT David Biggs (CEO) Andrew Knox (CFO) Andrew M Knox Jeffrey Schrull (Exp Man) Chief Financial Officer OFFICE Level 19 357 Collins Street Melbourne Vic 3000 CONTACT DETAILS Tel: +613 8610 4000 Fax: +613 9614 2142 EMAIL [email protected] WEBSITE www.cuenrg.com.au LISTINGS ASX: CUE ADR/OTC: CUEYY For personal use only ABN 45 066 383 971 RELEASE Cue acquires US conventional onshore oil production Melbourne, 5 June 2015: Cue Energy Resources Ltd (ASX: CUE) will boost oil output and gain significant potential for future production increases, through the acquisition of an 80% operated stake in the producing Pine Mills onshore conventional oil field, in Wood County, 160 km east of Dallas, Texas, USA. The acquisition, from Gale Force Petroleum of Canada (TSXV: GFE) includes a US$2 million cash payment, plus the obligation to carry US$1 million in operating and capital expenses for Gale Force’s retained interest over the next four years. -
High Arctic PEMT Layers
High Arctic PEMT Layers Table of Contents General Sensitivity Notes .............................................................................................................................. 3 Sensitivity Layers ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Grid Cell Sensitivity Rating ............................................................................................................................ 3 Polar Bear ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Rationale for Selection .............................................................................................................................. 3 Key habitat ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Sustainability Factors ................................................................................................................................ 4 Susceptibility to Oil and Gas Activities ...................................................................................................... 5 Potential Effects of Climate Change ......................................................................................................... 5 Sensitivity Ranking ................................................................................................................................... -
NB 8 Oil Field Unitization
AGENDA REQUEST BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS AGENDA OF: 5-9-16 ITEM NO.: Resolution No. R2016-81 DATE SUBMITTED: 5-3-16 DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Administration PREPARED BY: Darrin Coker PRESENTOR: Darrin Coker REVIEWED BY: NA REVIEW DATE: NA SUBJECT: Resolution No. R2016-81; A Resolution by the City Council of the City of Pearland, Texas, supporting an improved statutory procedure that provides for unitization of depleted Texas Gulf Coast oil fields; and setting forth related matters thereto. EXHIBIT: Thursday Packet Information EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: AMOUNT AVAILABLE: PROJECT NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: ACCOUNT NO.: PROJECT NO.: To be completed by Department: Finance Legal Ordinance Resolution EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) is required to make and enforce rules for the conservation of oil and gas in Texas. Current, yet outdated law, prohibits the RRC from requiring field wide Unitization. Unitization is the joint operation among separate operators of existing drilling units within a common defined reservoir to maximize the recovery of oil. Unitization would provide for a democratic process of a super-majority of the working and royalty interests to vote on a Plan of Unit Development. Numerous entities have already expressed their support for Unitization as a means of preventing the waste of billions of barrels of stranded, but recoverable oil in Gulf Coast oil fields. There is a concern that without Unitization, numerous leases will be lost and numerous fields will be plugged and abandoned without recovering valuable resources. The attached resolution is intended to express the City’s support for an improved statutory procedure that provides for Unitization in Texas to protect untapped resources. -
Kivalliq Musk Ox Management Plan
Page 1 of 20 DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HIGH ARCTIC MUSKOXEN OF THE QIKIQTAALUK REGION 2012 – 2017 Prepared in collaboration with: NTI Wildlife, Resolute Bay HTO, Arctic Bay HTO, Grise Fiord HTO and the Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board Draft Management Plan for High Arctic Muskoxen of the Qikiqtaaluk Region Page 2 of 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY 2.0 THE QIKIQTAALUK MUSKOX POPULATION AND RANGE 2.1 Muskox Range 2.2 Communities that Harvest Muskoxen 3.0 THE NEED FOR A MUSKOX MANAGEMENT PLAN 4.0 ROLES OF CO-MANAGEMENT PARTNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS 4.1 Role of the Co-Management Partners 4.2 Role of the Communities 4.3 Inclusion of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit 5.0 QIQIKTAALUK MUSKOX MANAGEMENT PLAN 5.1 Goals of the Management Plan 5.2 Management Plan Priorities 5.3 Management Strategies 5.4 Herd Monitoring and Indicators 5.5 Muskox Management Units 6.0 Action Plans Appendix A - RECOMMENDATIONS Appendix B – ACTION PLAN Draft Management Plan for High Arctic Muskoxen of the Qikiqtaaluk Region Page 3 of 20 1.0 SUMMARY Prior to the enactment of protection in 1917 (Burch, 1977), muskox populations throughout the central Arctic were hunted to near extinction. Although limited information is available on the status of muskoxen in much of the eastern Mainland (Fournier and Gunn, 1998), populations throughout Nunavut are currently re-colonizing much of their historical range. Qikiqtaaluk harvesters have reported increased sightings of muskoxen in close proximity to their communities which indicates that the animals have expanded their ranges significantly over the last few decades. The Qikiqtaaluk Muskox Management Plan will serve as a tool to assist the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (NWMB), the Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board (QWB), Government of Nunavut Department of Environment (DoE) and Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. -
North Magnetic Dip Pole (NMDP)
Journey to the Top (or the Relocated Dip) Ray Talson, Search & Rescue Society of BC The North Magnetic Pole - of interest to navigators for centuries - but no one knew exactly where it was. A study was done by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Geological survey of Canada, Geophysics Division, to determine the exact location of the North Magnetic Dip Pole (NMDP). This is the location where the north seeking end of the compass needle wants to point straight into the ground. The study was published by the Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 23, 1986. The study was authored by L.R. Newitt and E.R. Niblett. This review is based on pages 1062 through 1067 of that study. Back in 1831 a man by the name of J.C.ROSS (Ross 1834) was the first person to plot where the NORTH MAGNETIC POLE was. Its rapid motion, 800 km in 150 years (Barraclough and Malin 1981), has led to the re-determination of its position several times since. It has been customary for the Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Canada, to re- determine its position approximately once every decade. The pole has moved approximately 750 km since 1904, an average of 9.4 km per year. From 1973, when the pole position was last determined, to late 1983, the movement has been approximately 120 km, an average of 11.6 km per year, only slightly more than the 80 year average. Its present direction of travel is approximately northwest. The North Magnetic Pole was found to be very active and elusive. -
Queen Elizabeth Islands Game Survey, 1961
•^i.ri.iri^VJU.HIJJ^^^iiH^ Queen Elizabeth Islands Game Survey, 1961 by JOHN S. TENER OCCASIONAL PAPERS No. 4 QUEEN ELIZABETH ISLANDS GAME SURVEY, 1961 by John S. Tener Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Papers Number 4 National Parks Branch Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources Issued under the authority of the HONOURABLE ARTHUR LAING, P.C, M.P., B.S.A.. Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources ROGER DUHAMEL, F.R.S.C. Queen's Printer and Controller oi Stationery, Ottawa, 1963 Cat. No. R 69-1/4 CONTENTS 5 ABSTRACT 6 INTRODUCTION 7 OBJECTIVE Personnel, 7 Itinerary, 7 8 METHOD Logistics, 8 Survey design, 8 Survey method, 9 Sources of error, 11 13 RESULTS Caribou and muskoxen on the Islands Devon, 14 Mackenzie King, 28 Cornwallis, 14 Brock, 29 Little Cornwallis, 15 Ellef Ringnes, 29 Bathurst, 15 Amund Ringnes, 30 Melville, 20 Lougheed, 31 Prince Patrick, 23 King Christian, 32 Eglinton, 26 Cornwall, 32 Emerald, 27 Axel Heiberg, 32 Borden, 27 Ellesmere, 33 38 SPECIES SUMMARY Avifauna American and Gyrfalcon, 40 black brant, 38 Peregrine falcon, 41 Snow geese, 39 Rock ptarmigan, 41 Old Squaw, 40 Snowy owl, 41 King eider, 40 Raven, 41 Mammalian fauna Polar bear, 42 Seals, 44 Arctic fox, 43 Peary caribou, 45 Arctic wolf, 44 Muskoxen, 47 49 SUMMARY 50 REFERENCES LIST OF TABLES I Survey intensity of the Islands, 13 II Calculations, estimated caribou population, Bathurst Island, 18 III Calculations, estimated muskox population, Bathurst Island, 19 IV Observations from the ground of four muskox herds, Bracebridge Inlet,