DOCSLIB.ORG

Metrolinx Regional Express Rail - Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Update City-Wide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metrolinx Regional Express Rail - Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Update City-Wide CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2016 Item 28, Report No. 27, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted, as amended, by the Council of the City of Vaughan on June 28, 2016, as follows: By approving the following in accordance with Communication C10, from the Deputy City Manager, Planning & Growth Management, dated June 27, 2016: 1. THAT Council formally requests that Metrolinx and the Region of York support efforts to improve the strategic, economic, financial and operations case for the Highway 7 – Concord station through the Concord GO Centre Mobility Hub and Transportation studies, in support of the later inclusion of the Highway 7 – Concord station in the GO RER 10 Year program or in a subsequent implementation phase; 2. THAT Council formally requests that Metrolinx and the Region of York support efforts to advance the implementation of Kirby station; 3. THAT Metrolinx be requested to implement a comprehensive communication plan for RER Implementation in consultation with City staff which may include public meetings; 4. THAT Council formally request that Metrolinx and the Region of York work with City Staff to identify immediate short term Station Parking and Access solutions at the Rutherford and Maple GO stations to address current parking and station access pressure; and 5. THAT Metrolinx and the Region be requested to include consideration for additional grade separation crossings on Vaughan roads, specifically, McNaughton, Rivermede and Kirby Road, as part of RER implementation. Regional Councillor Di Biase declared an interest with respect to this matter as Communication C10 contains information related to Block 27, and his children own land in Block 27 given to them by their maternal Grandfather, and did not take part in the discussion or vote on the matter. 28 METROLINX REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL - BARRIE RAIL CORRIDOR EXPANSION UPDATE CITY-WIDE The Committee of the Whole recommends: 1) That the recommendation contained in the following report of the Deputy City Manager, Planning & Growth Management and Director of Development Engineering and Infrastructure Planning, dated June 21, 2016, be approved; and 2) That Communication C1, Confidential Memorandum from the City Solicitor and the Senior Manager of Real Estate, dated June 8, 2016, be received. Recommendation The Deputy City Manager, Planning & Growth Management and Director of Development Engineering and Infrastructure Planning, in consultation with the Director of Transportation Services and Parks Forestry and Operations, Director of Policy Planning and Environmental Sustainability, Director of By-law and compliance, licensing and permit services, and the Director of Corporate Communications, recommend: 1. THAT Staff be directed to continue to prepare input and advice to Metrolinx which includes requesting additional consideration of all existing and proposed grade separations, potentially two new GO stations, negotiating real property dispositions, and mitigation as part of the effort to advance the Regional Express Rail (RER) initiative in Vaughan. …/2 CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2016 Item 28, CW Report No. 27 – Page 2 Contribution to Sustainability Metrolinx’s RER is part of a larger comprehensive regional network of rapid transit corridors. As part of the RER service expansion, the Barrie GO corridor, which goes through the City (see Attachment 1), will result in reduced travel times and give people more options to get to where they want to go. This contributes to sustainability by providing commuters with more travel options so as to reduce auto dependency. Consistent with the City’s Community Sustainability and Environmental Master Plan – Green Directions, which identified the goal of ensuring the City is easy to get around and has a low environmental impact. Economic Impact Additional Staff resources to help facilitate this initiative are being pursued via discussion with transit agencies and will be identified in 2017 budget deliberations. Communications Plan There are several ways Metrolinx reaches out to engage communities and stakeholders: 1. Environmental assessment consultations through public meetings 2. Social media channels such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Flickr 3. Online engagement process at Metrolinxengage.com which allows the public to view the presentations and provide their feedback. The site went live on February 16th, 2016 4. Through participation in a stakeholder committees. Metrolinx has formed a number of stakeholder committees across the region to stay connected to communities. Seven corridor committees aligning with GO Transit’s seven rail lines discuss the program and its benefits to communities on that specific transit line. Members of corridor committees, which include elected and non-elected representatives, discuss projects along the respective lines, and provide strategic input and advice to Metrolinx from a corridor community perspective. Metrolinx has combined public consultation meetings in order to make it easier for residents and stakeholders to learn more about a number of projects that will enable transit expansion. These sessions allow residents and stakeholder’s access to information on the benefits and impacts to their communities and the region. In addition, City staff are participating through the formal study process on the Technical Agencies Committee (TAC) and through a series of coordination meetings on specific studies that impact on the City. Purpose This report is intended to provide Council with an update on the status of the Metrolinx RER Service Plan and associated initiatives. In particular, Staff activities in response to the Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project and actions taken by both the City and the Region to facilitate the project recognizing timelines for Metrolinx to finalize certain studies required to advance the initiative. Background The Province of Ontario is committed to improve transit infrastructure in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) In April 2015, the provincial government announced an approximately $16 billion commitment over the next 10 years for transit projects in the GTHA through its Trillium Trust and Moving …/3 CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2016 Item 28, CW Report No. 27 – Page 3 Ontario Forward Funds. The Trillium Trust and Moving Ontario Forward funds will allow the province to accelerate service enhancement to the GO rail network, including implementation of Regional Express Rail (RER). Regional Express Rail is a 10-year program that will change the way people commute through the entire region The vision for GO RER is to provide more frequent train services (two-way, all-day), higher speed electrified trains that are faster and reliable, reduce congestion on the roads, and promote growth and prosperity by improving access to destinations. Metrolinx has worked with the Province to develop the GO RER program, which is comprised of five key elements: 1. Service Concept - the foundation to determine infrastructure needs and develop a phasing plan 2. Infrastructure Needs – determination of the infrastructure and equipment needed to deliver on the Service Concept 3. Electrification Plan - the extent of electrification across the system 4. Phasing Plan - the optimal sequencing of infrastructure and service, considering factors like ridership growth, congestion benefits, and effective infrastructure delivery 5. Engagement Plan - the work necessary to engage stakeholders that include the public, municipalities, and elected officials Initial Business Case (IBC) for RER in March 2016 provides a basis for deciding the general scope and phasing of the RER investment including service plan and infrastructure requirements for each GO rail corridor within the RER program The IBC considered multiple aspects of the GO rail system including strategic, financial, economic and delivery mechanisms. It also outlines Metrolinx’s recommended service plan and infrastructure requirements for each of the GO rail corridors in York Region. The service plan and infrastructure recommendations were based on evaluation of various expansion and electrification scenarios. The outcome of the IBC recommended for the RER program, relevant to Barrie Corridor in the City can be summarized as follow: • Scenario 5 (10-Year Plan Optimized) offers a benefit-cost ratio of 3-1, meaning the benefits are three times the cost incurred. Scenario 5 will provide all-day, 15-minute electrified service to Aurora (Barrie Corridor) and Unionville (Stouffville Corridor), 30- minute service to Barrie and 20-minute service to Lincolnville during the peak period and hourly electrified service to Barrie and Mount Joy during off-peak. • No new stations were considered in the IBC. However, separate work is being undertaken in parallel by Metrolinx on the potential addition of new stations on all GO rail corridors including the Barrie GO Line. • Stations modifications at Maple and Rutherford Stations have been identified. • Of the 180 level crossings across the GTHA operated by GO, 13 are identified for consideration for road/rail grade separation. Two of these are located in the City at Rivermede Road and Rutherford Road. However, Metrolinx indicated the exact number of grade separations for planning purposes is to be determined. • Fare integration and parking charges were not considered in the IBC, though a fare integration study is underway and parking charges will be further explored by Metrolinx
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications
    Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 APPENDIX 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 2A: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION ...................................................... 1 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................. 1 1.4. Overview of Engagement Methodology ................................................................................... 2 2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS TO DATE ....................................................................... 3 2.1. Non‐Government Stakeholder List and Study Database ........................................................... 3 2.2. Electrification Study Website .................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Stakeholder Workshop # 1 ........................................................................................................ 4 2.4. Metrolinx Planning and Transportation Leaders Forum ........................................................... 4 2.5. GO Transit Customer Service Advisory Committee Meeting ..................................................... 4 2.6. Update Meeting (Georgetown Corridor) ................................................................................... 4 2.7. Municipal Transit Leaders Briefing
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Express Rail Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
    DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 APPENDIX 8B
    Appendix 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 APPENDIX 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 8B INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2. BASIS OF ESTIMATE .......................................................................................................... 2 3. POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................. 3 3.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 3 3.2. Inclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3. Assumptions .................................................................................................................................. 4 4. TRACK AND TRACK ELEMENTS .......................................................................................... 5 4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2. Inclusions .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call
    2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM Municipal Office Council Chambers
    Agenda Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM Municipal Office Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest & Nature Thereof 3. Adoption of the Minutes i. Minutes of the 5th Regular Meeting of the Scugog Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee held May 16, 2017 Errors & Omissions: Recommendation: THAT the Minutes of the 5th Regular Meeting of the Scugog Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee held May 16, 2017 be adopted. 4. Business Arising Out of the Minutes 5. Deputation i. Doug Young - Property Owner David Brand – Developer Re: 234 Union Avenue ii. Sol-Arch Ltd. Jonathan Benczkowski Re: 289 North Street iii. Fraser Dimma – TENTATIVE Re: 221 Mary Street – Mueller Property To request an alternative accessible format, please contact the Clerks Department at 905-985-7346 6. Reports/Updates i. GBCA Architects RE: Borgal Report - Merits of Designating the Property at 221Mary Street ii. Township of Scugog – Peter Wokral RE: Township of Scugog’s Reply to Borgal Report 221 Mary Street Committee to review and forward a motion to Council to adjust or reaffirm the committee’s previously stated position regarding the above noted matter. iii. Erika Kohek – Township Staff RE: Draft Policy for Evaluation of Heritage Resources Committee to review and forward a motion to adopt or revise. iv. Erika Kohek – Township Staff RE: Adding Properties to the Register Committee to review and forward a motion to adopt or revise. v. Curator’s Report(s) Recommendation: THAT the reports prepared by the Curator dated June 20, 2017 be received for information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis
    Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis by Alaa Itani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Alaa Itani 2019 Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis Alaa Itani Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto 2019 Abstract Bus Bridging is the strategy most commonly applied in responding to rail service interruptions in North America and Europe. In determining the required number of buses and source routes, most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches based on operational experience and constraints, which can lead to extensive delays and queue build-ups at affected stations. This thesis developed an optimization model, to determine the optimal number of shuttle buses and route allocation which minimize the overall subway and bus riders delay. The generated optimal solutions are sensitive to bus bay capacity constraints along the shuttle service corridor. The optimization model is integrated with a previously developed simulation tool that tracks the evolution of system queues and delays throughout the bus bridging process. A set of bus bridging policy guidelines were developed based on further analysis of the optimization model outputs using a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model. ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my parents and for their continuous support and trust in my abilities. Although they were thousands of miles away, they were always supportive, I couldn’t have made it here without their presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation 7:00 – 8:00 Grouppg Working Session 8:00 – 8:15 Reporting Back 8:15 – 8:30 Wrap-Uppp and Next Steps Presentation Outline
    City of Burlington Official Plan Review: Mobility Hub Opportunities and Constraints February 12th Public Workshop BrookMcIlroy/ ARUP Toniggght’s Agenda 6:00 - 6:30 Panel Viewing and Welcome 6:30 – 7:00 Introductory Presentation 7:00 – 8:00 Grouppg Working Session 8:00 – 8:15 Reporting Back 8:15 – 8:30 Wrap-Uppp and Next Steps Presentation Outline • Mobilityyp Hub Recap • Study Overview • Opportunities and Constraints • Workshop # 1 Summary • The Mobility Hubs • Tonight’s Workshop Mobilityyp Hub Recap What is a Mobility Hub? “Mobility hubs are urban growth centres and major transit station areas with significant levels of planned transit service … and high residential and employment development potential within an approximately 800 metre radius ofhf the rap id trans it stat ion. ” - The Big Move (2008) Mobilityyp Hub Recap Why are Mobility Hubs Important? Nodes in the Regional transppy(g,ortation system (origin, destination, and transfer) There is (or is potential for) significant passenger activity Gateway for many City visitors Potential to be vibrant places to live, work and socialize Accommodate City’s employment and population density targets in a sustainable way Mobilityyp Hub Recap What are the Characteristics of a Mobility Hub? - Seamless integration between modes (walking, cycling, transit, private vehicles) - A well-connected active transportation network - Vital, pedestrian-supportive streets - A mix of uses that support a healthy neighbourhood - Consolidated station facilities - Attractive public spaces (i.e. streetscapes, plazas,
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    Community Planning, Regulation and Mobility Committee Meeting Agenda Date: December 8, 2020 Time: 9:30 am Location: Council Chambers - members participating remotely Pages 1. Declarations of Interest: 2. Statutory Public Meetings: Statutory public meetings are held to present planning applications in a public forum as required by the Planning Act. 3. Delegation(s): Due to COVID-19 this meeting will be conducted virtually. Only the chair of the meeting, along with a clerk and audio/visual technician, will be in council chambers, with all other staff, members of council and delegations participating in the meeting remotely. The meeting will be live webcasted, as usual, and archived on the city website. Requests to delegate to this virtual meeting can be made by completing the online delegation registration form at www.burlington.ca/delegate or by submitting a written request by email to the Clerks Department at [email protected] by noon the day before the meeting is to be held. All requests to delegate must contain a copy of the delegate’s intended remarks which will be circulated to all members of committee in advance as a backup should any technology issues occur. If you do not wish to delegate, but would like to submit feedback, please email your comments to [email protected]. Your comments will be circulated to committee members in advance of the meeting and will be attached to the minutes, forming part of the public record. 4. Consent Items: Reports of a routine nature, which are not expected to require discussion and/or debate. Staff may not be in attendance to respond to queries on items contained in the Consent Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
    Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Eglinton West Rapid Transit Initial Business Case Analysis
    APPENDIX 4 ENHANCED EGLINTON WEST RAPID TRANSIT INITIAL BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS JUNE 2016 Cover Image: Marcus Bowman TABLE OF CONTENTS Problem Statement II 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Context 2 3.0 Study Overview 4 4.0 Strategic Case 9 5.0 Financial Case 18 6.0 Economic Case 20 7.0 Deliverability and Operations Case 23 8.0 Next Steps 25 Appendix 26 I PROBLEM STATEMENT The implementation of the Mississauga BRT, Eglinton Crosstown Phase 1, as well as Union Pearson Express and RER connections at Mt. Dennis will bring vital rapid transit improvements to the Eglinton corridor and the region, but will also leave a key gap in the rapid transit network along Eglinton West between Mt. Dennis and Renforth Gateway. The corridor provides an opportunity for a connection to Pearson Airport and surrounding employment by linking communities, people, and jobs to and along the Mississauga BRT and Eglinton LRT. An Environmental Assessment was completed in 2010 for an at- grade LRT through the corridor with 14 stops along Eglinton Ave at all cross roads. In the context of current planning work being coordinated between Metrolinx and the City of Toronto there is a need to develop feasible options to optimize the 2010 EA design and understand their various benefits to different users and travel patterns. II INITIAL BUSINESS CASE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Eglinton West: A Gap in the Regional Rapid Transit Network The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area’s Regional Transportation Plan, The Big Move, was adopted in 2008 and set out a 25-year vision for supporting growth in the region.
    [Show full text]