TOWN BOARD MEETING AUGUST 26, 2020 7:00 PM Brighton Town Hall 2300 Elmwood Avenue

Due to the state of emergency over COVID-19 and necessary social distancing, this meeting is conducted remotely via video conferencing and broadcast on cable channel 1303 & live streamed at https://www.townofbrighton.org/499/Streaming-Video

Call in to participate in Open Forum: 585-303-3060

PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIONS:

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:

OPEN FORUM:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

APPROVE AND FILE TOWN BOARD MEETING MINUTES FOR:

PUBLIC HEARINGS: MATTER RE: Public hearing for proposed parking prohibition along Penfield Road near the Corbett’s Glen Nature Park parking lot (see Resolution #1, letter dated July 16, 2020 from Michael E. Guyon, Commissioner of Public Works, and letter dated July 31, 2020 from Timothy P. Frelier, P.E.).

BIDS:

COMMUNICATIONS: FROM: Jennifer Cesario, Controller, Monroe County, dated August 14, 2020, Re: Monroe County sales tax distribution for second quarter 2020.

FROM: Janice M. Toland, Personnel Technician, Monroe County, dated August 20, 2020, Re: town of Brighton 2020 Civil Service Certified Payroll Signature Sheet.

FROM: Amy Mello, Freedom for All Americans, dated August 20, 2020, Re: Amicus brief in support of LGBTQ protections.

COMMITTEE REPORTS: Community Services Committee Finance and Administrative Services Public Safety Services Public Works Services

OLD BUSINESS:

NEW BUSINESS: MATTER RE: Reading and approval of claims (Resolution #08-26-2020-CLAIMS). 2

MATTER RE: Authorize the Supervisor to amend the Out of District Agreement for Sewer Use with the Town of Penfield to include 49 Collinsworth Drive (see Resolution #2 and letter dated August 10, 2020 from Michael Guyon, Commissioner of Public Works).

MATTER RE: Declare structures at 405 and 417 Western Drive as dangerous and unsafe and set a public hearing date for proposed demolition of said structure (see Resolution #3 and letters dated August 12, 2020 from Ramsey Boehner, Town Planner).

MATTER RE: Authorize the Supervisor to approve a change order in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for a total contract amount of $174,200 with Roman Construction Development Corp. for the 2020 sidewalk replacement program (see Resolution #4 and letter dated August 20, 2020 from Michael Guyon, Commissioner of Public Works).

MATTER RE: Authorize the Supervisor to execute a renewal agreement with the County of Monroe for participation in the Energy Aggregation Group (see Resolution #5 and letter dated August 26, 2020 from William W. Moehle, Town Supervisor).

MATTER RE: Community Choice Aggregation discussion.

MATTERS OF THE SUPERVISOR: July 2020 Expense and Revenue Report

MATTERS OF THE ATTORNEY TO THE TOWN:

MATTERS OF THE TOWN CLERK:

MATTERS OF THE BOARD:

MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION:

MEETING ADJOURNED:

NEXT TOWN BOARD MEETING: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 7 PM OPEN FORUM PUBLIC HEARINGS At a Town Board Meeting of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York, held on the 26th day of August, 2020 via Video Conference pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 as extended.

PRESENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE:

WILLIAM W. MOEHLE,

Supervisor

CHRISTOPHER K. WERNER JASON S. DIPONZIO ROBIN R. WILT CHRISTINE E. CORRADO,

Councilmembers

WHEREAS, the Town Board duly scheduled a Public Hearing to be held on the 26th day of August 2020 at 7:00 p.m., to consider the adoption of a proposed Local Law to be known as “2020 Penfield Road Parking Restrictions” to amend the Brighton Town Code by amending Section 185-46 of the Town Code to prohibit parking on both sides of Penfield Road from North Landing Road to

Superior Road; and

WHEREAS, such public hearing was duly called and held on August 26,

2020 at 7:00 pm and all persons having an interest in the matter having had an opportunity to be heard;

NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Councilmember ______, seconded by Councilmember ______,

BE IT RESOLVED, that all written comments provided to the Town at the

Public Hearing held on August 26, 2020 regarding the proposed Local Law be received and filed; and

BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF BRIGHTON, that pursuant to the provisions of Article 3 of the Municipal Home Rule Law of the State of

New York, the Town hereby adopts the proposed amendment to Town Code by amending Section 185-46 as set forth in the annexed Local Law; and it is further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Town of Brighton shall within twenty days after the adoption of the Local Law file one certified copy thereof in

Brigtres08-26-2020-01 the Office of the Town Clerk and file one certified copy in the Office of the

Secretary of State of the State of New York.

Dated: August 26, 2020

William W. Moehle, Supervisor Voting ____

Christopher K. Werner, Councilmember Voting ____

Jason S. DiPonzio, Councilmember Voting ____

Robin R. Wilt, Councilmember Voting ____

Christine E. Corrado, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-01 LOCAL LAW # ____OF 2020 2020 PENFIELD ROAD PARKING RESTRICTIONS

Section 1. Title

This Local Law shall be known as the “2020 PENFIELD ROAD PARKING RESTRICTIONS” of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York State.

Section 2. Purpose

The purpose of this Local Law is to provide parking restrictions in the Town of Brighton along the north and south sides of Penfield Road from North Landing Road to Superior Road near the Brighton Town border with Penfield. The parking restrictions are intended to promote public safety as parking in the vicinity of Corbett’s Glen Nature Park has become a concern since there is inadequate space to park safely along Penfield Road, there are no pedestrian safety markings or other means of safely exiting a parked car on Penfield Road to traverse the road or shoulder and Penfield Road itself is a highly travelled roadway with in excess of 11,000 vehicles on average a day.

Section 3. Parking Restrictions

Section 185-46 is hereby amended to add the following provisions so as to prohibit parking at all times on those portions of the streets indicated below:

Name of Street Side Location

Penfield Road Both N. Landing Road to Superior Road

These provisions shall supersede any existing inconsistent parking restrictions on any of these streets under Chapter 185 of the Brighton Town Code.

Section 4. Effective Date and Sunset Provisions

This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State.

Page 1 of 2

Section 5. Severability

If any clause, sentence, phrase, paragraph or any part of this Local Law shall for any reason be adjudicated finally by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this Local Law, but shall be confined in its operation and effect to the clause, sentence, phrase, paragraph or part thereof, directly involved in the controversy or action in which such judgment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that the remainder of this Local Law would have been adopted had any such provision been excluded.

Page 2 of 2

COMMUNICATIONS

Bridget Monroe

Fulton v. Philadelphia: Local Government Amicus Brief - now submitted 2 messages

Amy Mello Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:56 PM To: William Moehle , [email protected]

Mayor Moehle,

The brief has just been submitted and can be found here.

The Local Government brief was endorsed by 169 signers including Mayors, Cities, Counties and the US Conference of Mayors. Signers represent 129 unique municipalities and more than 53 million Americans.

Oral Argument for Fulton v. Philadelphia at the Supreme Court has now been scheduled for November 4. As the case progresses, municipal leaders will continue to be a critical voice in support of the enforcement of local LGBTQ protections and opposing attempts to create a license to discriminate with taxpayer funds.

We ask that you use the resources below to share your leadership today and we are eager to work with your teams to identify further opportunities to highlight your support.

Share Your Support:

Mayor-specific and general graphics are attached to this email A sample Press Release is available here Sample Social Media Language can be found here - including language for Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (also below)

Thank you for your support and your leadership. Amy Mello 401-683-8183

Sample Municipal Leader FB Language

Proud to join 160+ mayors, cities, and municipalities asking the Supreme Court to rule against giving taxpayer-funded foster care agencies a right to discriminate.

That’s the issue in an upcoming case, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, where a foster care agency is refusing to serve qualified LGBTQ couples, putting foster kids at an even greater risk of not finding a home.

This goes beyond foster agencies too. As our amicus brief states, the Court could implement a broad right to discriminate in a wide range of taxpayer-funded services: 參 food banks homeless shelters disaster relief services, etc.

No one should worry about being turned away from crucial services because of who they are. Learn more and join me in speaking out. www.mayorsagainstlgbtdiscrimination.org/fulton/

AMY MELLO Freedom for All Americans / Freedom for All Americans Education Fund [ C ] 401-683-8183 [ E ] [email protected] [ O ] freedomforallamericans.org [ P ] she, her, hers

2 attachments

Mayors_Fulton_TW-2.png 294K

Mayors_Fulton_FB-2.png 471K

William Moehle Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:39 PM To: Bridget Monroe

Bridget, can you please add this item to communications.The actual brief is at the link included in the email. It isn't long, so perhaps you can include that as well.

Bill [Quoted text hidden]

2 attachments

Mayors_Fulton_TW-2.png 294K

Mayors_Fulton_FB-2.png 471K

No. 19-123

IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ______SHARONELL FULTON, ET AL., Petitioners, v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL., Respondents. ______On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the______Third Circuit BRIEF OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MAYORS, AND U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS ______

JAMES E. JOHNSON Corporation Counsel RICHARD DEARING Counsel of Record CLAUDE S. PLATTON LORENZO DI SILVIO New York City Law Department 100 Church Street New York, NY 10007 (212) 356-2500 [email protected]

(Additional counsel listed in Appendix)

i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...... ii INTEREST OF AMICI AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...... 1 ARGUMENT ...... 3 I. Amici rely on contracts to deliver a wide range of public services in their diverse communities...... 3 II. Granting contractors exemptions from nondiscrimination requirements would implicate amici in conveying a message of exclusion...... 6 III. Granting contractors exemptions from nondiscrimination requirements would impair the delivery of services offered through public–private partnerships...... 8 IV. Petitioners’ position could affect nearly every aspect of public services offered through public–private partnerships...... 17 CONCLUSION ...... 20 APPENDIX ...... 21

ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) FEDERAL CASES: Agency for Int’l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, 133 S. Ct. 2321 (2013) ...... 6 Bob Jones Univ. v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983) ...... 17 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014) ...... 17 Emp’t Div., Dep’t of Human Res. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) ...... 17, 19 Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) ...... 7 Maddonna v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 6:19-cv-03551-TMC, ECF No. 43 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2020) ...... 17 Marouf v. Azar, 391 F. Supp. 3d 23 (D.D.C. 2019) ...... 16 Newman v. Piggie Park Enters., Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968) ...... 17 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) ...... 7 Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984) ...... 6

iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) Rogers v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 6:19-cv-01567-TMC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148885 (D.S.C. May 8, 2020) ...... 16 Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991) ...... 6, 8 Teen Ranch, Inc. v. Udow, 479 F.3d 403 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1039 (2007) ...... 19 STATE CASES: Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 874 P.2d 274 (Alaska 1994) ...... 18 FEDERAL STATUTES: 1 Stat. 54 ...... 3 STATE STATUTES, CODES & REGULATIONS: Albany N.Y., City Code § 48-26(E) ...... 5 Cal. Gov’t Code § 11135(a) ...... 5 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 34070 et seq...... 4 Cal. Wel. & Inst. Code § 16013 ...... 10 Cook Cty., Ill., Code of Ordinances § 42-40(a) ...... 5 Cty. of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Cty. Bd. of Supervisors Policy Manual § 5.5.5.4 (2020) ...... 5 N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 6-123(b) ...... 5

iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) OTHER AUTHORITIES: David M. Brodzinsky, Expanding Re- sources for Children III: Research-Based Best Practices in Adoption by Gays and Lesbians (Oct. 2011) ...... 10 Bianca D. M. Wilson et al., Williams Inst., Sexual & Gender Minority Youth in Foster Care: Assessing Disproportionality and Disparities in Los Angeles (2014), archived at https://perma.cc/LPR6-S298 ...... 10 Chi. Dep’t of Family & Support Servs., Homeless Services, archived at https://perma.cc/VLT7-ZZ86 ...... 11 Chi. Dep’t of Family & Support Servs., Shelter, archived at https://perma.cc/MSD6-BDXF ...... 11 City of Madison, Wis., Cmty. Dev. Div., 2020 Contracts, archived at https://perma.cc/S6FR-DU42 ...... 7 Cty. of Santa Clara, Office of Gender Based Violence, Resources for Survivors During the Covid-19 Crisis, archived at https://perma.cc/EBS7-HLSX ...... 7 Cty. of Santa Clara, Soc. Servs. Agency, archived at https://perma.cc/EC9E-CE42 ...... 9 Food and Beverage Mgmt. Contract with City of Houston, archived at https://perma.cc/JLL5-UZPK ...... 4

v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) Harris County Extends Contract with Houston Food Bank To Provide Meals to Families Struggling Due to COVID-19, Houston Style Magazine, July 28, 2020, archived at https://perma.cc/DB3F-F7JA ...... 4 U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., The AFCARS Report (2017), archived at https://perma.cc/E3EN-3TB2 ...... 11 Jeffrey R. Henig, Privatization in the United States: Theory and Practice, 104 Pol. Sci. Q. 649 (Winter 1989–90) ...... 3 Jon Michaels, Privatization’s Progeny, 101 Geo. L.J. 1023 (2013) ...... 5 K.W. Rhodes, et al., Foster Family Re- sources, Psychosocial Functioning, and Re- tention, 27 Soc. Work Research 135 (2003) ...... 9 Kevin Kosar, Congressional Research Serv., Privatization and the Federal Government: An Introduction (Dec. 28, 2016), archived at https://perma.cc/T3AR-3DM4 ...... 3 L.A. Cty., Before and After School Pro- grams, archived at https://perma.cc/2D7R-H2TJ ...... 4 L.A. Cty. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., Foster Family Agencies, archived at https://perma.cc/KL6V-E9ZU ...... 7

vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) L.A. Hunter et al., Soc. Justice Sexuality Project, CUNY, Intersecting Injustice: Addressing LGBTQ Poverty and Eco- nomic Justice for All (2018), archived at https://perma.cc/TAJ9-KD8R ...... 12 Lane Cty., Or., Emergency Services Pro- vider List, archived at https://perma.cc/ZSH7-C934...... 7 Martha Minow, Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Religion, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1229 (2003) ...... 5 Megan Martin et al., Ctr. for the Study of Soc. Pol’y, Out of the Shadows: Supporting LGBTQ Youth in Child Welfare Through Cross-System Collaboration (2016), ar- chived at https://perma.cc/TFF6-VJAU ...... 11 Mich. Adoption Res. Exch., Mich. Adop- tion & Foster Care Agencies by Cty., ar- chived at https://perma.cc/QDB9-GK29 ...... 16 Michael Gilman, Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized Welfare, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 569 (2001) ...... 3, 5 N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Become a Foster or Adoptive Parent, archived at https://perma.cc/X4L4-6UHV ...... 9 N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Foster Care Statistics for FY19, archived at https://perma.cc/RCC5-37HJ ...... 9 N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Guidance #2008/05, archived at https://perma.cc/935R-LXSJ ...... 10

vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Preventive Services, archived at https://perma.cc/SC7C-LZYJ ...... 4 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Citywide Administrative Servs., The City Record Online, Solicitation for In-Home Therapy Program, available at https://a856- cityrecord.nyc.gov/RequestDetail/201904 22023 (last visited Aug. 16, 2020) ...... 13 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Citywide Administrative Servs., The City Record Online, Solicitation for Jail to Jobs Re-entry Program, available at https://a856- cityrecord.nyc.gov/RequestDetail/201710 02003 (last visited Aug. 16, 2020) ...... 13 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Homeless Servs. Daily Report, archived at https://perma.cc/STH6-8SKW ...... 11 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Homeless Servs., Providers, archived at https://perma.cc/MJ94-WHJ5 ...... 7, 11 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Hous. Preservation & Dev., Emergency Repair Program, ar- chived at https://perma.cc/WJ2D-QVAS ...... 18 Nat’l Alliance To End Homelessness, Many Western and Southern States Lack Suffi- cient Shelter Capacity for Individual Homeless Adults (Apr. 24, 2019), archived at https://perma.cc/2NHZ-BA2Y ...... 15

viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) Nestor M. Davidson, Relational Contracts in the Privatization of Social Welfare: The Case of Housing, 24 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 263 (2006) ...... 3, 5 Office of the N.Y.C. Comptroller, Annual Summary Contracts Report for the City of New York, Fiscal Year 2019, archived at https://perma.cc/A882-VBQB ...... 4 Richard Bränström & John E. Pachankis, Reduction in Mental Health Treatment Uti- lization Among Transgender Individuals After Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Total Population Study, 177 Am. J. Psych. 727, 727 (2020) ...... 12 S.E. James, et al., Nat’l Ctr. for Transgender Equality, The Report of the 2015 Transgender Survey (2015), ar- chived at https://perma.cc/AE4A-QQ9Z ...... 13 S.F. Adult Probation Dep’t, Catalog of Reentry Services Funded by SFAPD, ar- chived at https://perma.cc/LN4E-KDBU ...... 13 S. Frazer & E.E. Howe, The LGBT Cmty. Ctr., LGBT Health and Human Services Needs in New York State (2016), ar- chived at https://perma.cc/M6TWPAMB ...... 12 Shoshana K. Goldberg & Kerith J. Conron, Williams Inst., How Many Same-Sex Couples in the U.S. Are Rais- ing Children? (July 2018), archived at https://perma.cc/DRN3-QAHK ...... 10

ix TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) Stephen L. Reich & Janet L. Davis, Nat’l Ctr. for Transit Research, Univ. of S. Fla., Analysis of Contracting for Fixed Route Bus Service (June 2011), archived at https://perma.cc/P9KK-V363 ...... 4, 18 Tex. Dep’t of Family & Prot. Servs., Search for Child Placing Agencies for Foster Care, archived at https://perma.cc/DB83-GAJE ...... 7

INTEREST OF AMICI AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT1 Amici curiae are 166 cities, towns, counties, and mayors representing more than 53 million Americans across the country.2 Amici comprise both metropolis- es like New York, Chicago, Houston, and Los Angeles and smaller cities like Champaign, Illinois; Iowa City, Iowa; and Carrboro, North Carolina. Amici represent the level of government most closely connected to our Nation’s communities, providing a wide range of essential services to enable the members of those communities to live healthy and stable lives and contribute to society. The amici governments have long chosen to partner with private entities to provide publicly funded services touching many aspects of our residents’ lives. These include important social services for the most vulnerable members of our communities— foster care being just one example. And many amici bar contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics when they deliver government services.

1 Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37, the parties to this matter have consented to the filing of this brief. No counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no party or counsel for a party made a monetary contribution intended to fund its preparation or submission. No person other than the amici or their counsel made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of this brief. 2 Amici also include the U.S. Conference of Mayors, a nonprofit, non-partisan organization of cities with a population of 30,000 or more. A complete list of amici is set forth in the appendix.

2 Amici have a strong interest in whether the First Amendment permits private providers under con- tract with local governments to opt out of such nondiscrimination requirements, designed, as they are, to ensure the fair, equitable, and neutral deliv- ery of public services. Requiring amici to facilitate and fund the provision of services by private entities that refuse to work with certain members of our communities would implicate amici in conveying a message of exclusion that we find it of paramount importance to avoid. Religious exemptions would also impair amici’s ability to deliver essential government services effectively. Government-funded services are often the last resort for members of our communities most in need of assistance. Reaching those individuals and families—building their trust and fostering their connections to the community—can be a tremendous challenge. Adding barriers to access unrelated to eligibility for public services—such as provider-based exclusions of certain groups—would make it only more difficult to reach those in need of support. And it is by no means clear that in every community, particularly smaller communities, there will be alternative contractors to meet the needs of groups excluded because of a contractor’s religious objections. A ruling in petitioners’ favor would open the door to a variety of claims for religious exemption from innumerable generally applicable provisions of public contracts. Petitioners’ challenge, if successful, could therefore lead amici to curtail the use of contracting for public services, and thus to forgo the many bene- fits to local governments and their residents that come from partnering with private entities.

3 ARGUMENT I. Amici rely on contracts to deliver a wide range of public services in their diverse communities. Partnerships between government and private entities play a vital role in the delivery of public services. Governments have partnered with private parties for this purpose since the Founding—the First Congress authorized Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton to contract for the construction and maintenance of a lighthouse for the Chesapeake Bay. See 1 Stat. 54; see, e.g., Kevin Kosar, Congressional Research Serv., Privatization and the Federal Gov- ernment: An Introduction 2 (Dec. 28, 2016), archived at https://perma.cc/T3AR-3DM4; Michael Gilman, Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized Welfare, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 569, 581, 591 (2001). Beginning in the late nineteenth century, governments began turning to private entities to provide social services, in par- ticular poverty relief. Nestor M. Davidson, Relational Contracts in the Privatization of Social Welfare: The Case of Housing, 24 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 263, 268 (2006). In the modern era, the use of contracting for the delivery of public services has expanded, with “[a]ll levels of government … increasingly employing private entities to undertake functions traditionally performed by the public sector.” Id. at 267. At the local level, by 1990, 80,000 governments had estab- lished public–private partnerships by contract or other means. Jeffrey R. Henig, Privatization in the United States: Theory and Practice, 104 Pol. Sci. Q. 649, 656–57 (Winter 1989–90). Today, local governments use contracts with pri- vate parties to provide a host of essential services, touching on nearly every aspect of local governments’

4 relationships with their residents. For instance, some local governments contract with private parties to run public transportation or shuttle services;3 to prepare meals for students, the elderly, incarcerated individuals, or those in need; 4 to run shelters for people displaced by natural disasters; 5 to operate concessions in public parks or convention centers;6 to provide support services to parents to prevent their children from being placed in foster care; 7 and to offer before- or after-school programs for schoolchil- dren.8 Recently, New York City alone entered into contracts for services totaling in excess of $22 billion, at least $8 billion of which was for social services.9 These public–private partnerships can confer sig- nificant benefits. They may reduce costs, ensure that

3 See, e.g., Stephen L. Reich & Janet L. Davis, Nat’l Ctr. for Transit Research, Univ. of S. Fla., Analysis of Contracting for Fixed Route Bus Service vi (June 2011), archived at https://perma.cc/P9KK-V363. 4 See, e.g., Harris County Extends Contract with Houston Food Bank To Provide Meals to Families Struggling Due to COVID- 19, Houston Style Magazine, July 28, 2020, archived at https://perma.cc/DB3F-F7JA. 5 See, e.g., Cal. Health & Safety Code § 34070 et seq. 6 See, e.g., Food and Beverage Mgmt. Contract with City of Houston, archived at https://perma.cc/JLL5-UZPK (2007 contract to operate concessions at George R. Brown Convention Center). 7 See, e.g., N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Preventive Services, archived at https://perma.cc/SC7C-LZYJ. 8 See, e.g., L.A. Cty., Before and After School Programs, ar- chived at https://perma.cc/2D7R-H2TJ. 9 See Office of the N.Y.C. Comptroller, Annual Summary Contracts Report for the City of New York, Fiscal Year 2019, at App’x 7, archived at https://perma.cc/A882-VBQB.

5 service delivery is responsive to community condi- tions, and increase the quality of services by stimu- lating competition and innovation or by operating on a smaller scale. See, e.g., Davidson, supra, at 270; Jon Michaels, Privatization’s Progeny, 101 Geo. L.J. 1023, 1030–36 (2013); Martha Minow, Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Reli- gion, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1229, 1242–43 (2003). They may also help bring to bear a diversity of perspec- tives and increase participation by ethnic, religious, and cultural groups within communities by drawing new people into operations previously handled by the government. Davidson, supra, at 270; Gilman, supra, at 596; Minow, supra, at 1245. Indeed, community- based groups, by virtue of their location in amici’s diverse communities, are often intimately familiar with and thus well situated to address a community’s needs. Amici require that private entities providing public services under contract refrain from discriminating on the basis of protected characteristics. Some amici impose these requirements by contract, while others have enacted laws prohibiting government contrac- tors from discriminating in the performance of the contracts they receive. 10 The purpose of these re- quirements is not to force conformity of belief—amici value the religious diversity of our communities, and reject discrimination on the basis of religion—but to ensure that all our residents receive publicly funded

10 See, e.g., Albany, N.Y., City Code § 48-26(E)(3); Cook Cty., Ill., Code of Ordinances § 42-40(a); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 6-123(b); Cty. of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Cty. Bd. of Supervisors Policy Manual § 5.5.5.4 (2020), archived at https://perma.cc/35GR- KJP2; see also Cal. Gov’t Code § 11135(a) (barring discrimination under state-funded programs).

6 services with dignity and respect and without expe- riencing exclusion. Nondiscrimination requirements are critical, both because of the message of inclusion they send to amici’s diverse residents, and because they are directly tied to the effective delivery of essential services. II. Granting contractors exemptions from nondiscrimination requirements would implicate amici in conveying a message of exclusion. Petitioners contend that they have a constitutional right to continue providing public services under a government contract, and to receive government funds, while refusing to abide by the requirement that all contractors deliver services without regard to personal characteristics such as race, religion, gen- der, or sexual orientation. Requiring local govern- ments to contract with religious providers that engage in status-based discrimination would frus- trate amici’s commitment to nondiscrimination and dilute the message of inclusion that amici have worked to convey through their programs. Government has an interest “of the highest order” in eliminating all forms of discrimination. Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 624 (1984). Prohibiting discrimination by contractors conveys the govern- ment’s message that all members of the community are valued and are entitled to services and support. The Court has long recognized that the conduct of publicly funded service providers can send a message about the government’s own judgments and values. See Agency for Int’l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, 133 S. Ct. 2321, 2328 (2013); Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 194 (1991). When a private entity receiving public funds under a government contract

7 tells amici’s residents to seek public services else- where, whether because of the color of their skin, the substance of their beliefs, or whom they love, it sends the message that the government does not view those individuals as full members of our communi- ties entitled to equal respect. That message consti- tutes a dignitary harm of the first order. See, e.g., Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 670–71 (2015); Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241, 250 (1964). It makes little difference to the individuals receiv- ing this message whether the messenger is a gov- ernment agency or a private contractor acting in the government’s place. It also makes little difference whether there are other providers willing to offer the same services, since dignitary harms occur whenever members of amici’s communities are turned away by an entity that receives and spends government funds. A thought experiment helps illustrate this point for foster care. Some amici, such as Los Angeles County, publish guidance listing the private entities it con- tracts with to deliver services.11 Under petitioners’

11 See L.A. Cty. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., Foster Family Agencies, archived at https://perma.cc/KL6V-E9ZU; see also N.Y.C. Dep’t of Homeless Servs., Providers, archived at https://perma.cc/MJ94-WHJ5 (listing shelter providers in New York City); Cty. of Santa Clara, Office of Gender Based Violence, Re- sources for Survivors During the Covid-19 Crisis, archived at https://perma.cc/EBS7-HLSX (listing private gender-based violence service providers); City of Madison, Wis., Cmty. Dev. Div., 2020 Contracts, archived at https://perma.cc/S6FR-DU42 (listing private community-support service providers); Lane Cty., Or., Emergency Services Provider List, archived at https://perma.cc/ZSH7-C934; Tex. Dep’t of Family & Prot. Servs., Search for Child Placing Agencies for Foster Care, archived at https://perma.cc/DB83-GAJE.

8 position, these local governments would face an untenable choice. One option would be to specify, in the government’s own guidance, which of the listed organizations would not entertain applications from members of which groups. The other would be to withhold that important information and leave people to discover it for themselves, wasting their time and exposing them to arguably more pointed acts of exclusion. Neither choice is acceptable. The solution is clear: local governments should be al- lowed to “define the limits” of their programs and require nondiscrimination in the performance of government contracts. Rust, 500 U.S. at 194. III. Granting contractors exemptions from nondiscrimination requirements would impair the delivery of services offered through public–private partnerships. Exemptions from nondiscrimination requirements would also impair the delivery of important public services. Nondiscrimination requirements remove barriers to access to services—often services of last resort—for the most vulnerable members of amici’s communities. These services benefit both the indi- viduals who receive them and the community at large. Exemptions would only add to existing barri- ers to access faced by vulnerable members of our communities. They would also exacerbate the challeng- es that local governments already face in delivering many of those services. We discuss three examples here. 1. Nondiscrimination helps local governments pro- vide the best possible foster care for children who might otherwise have little or no family support. Some of the amici responsible for foster care award contracts, as Philadelphia does, to private providers

9 to place abused or neglected children with prospec- tive foster parents, or to provide those parents with support services.12 Last year, for example, the City of New York entered into contracts valued at more than $550 million for foster-care services for the nearly 8,000 children in the city’s care.13 As we all know, having a stable and supportive home environment is crucial for a child to achieve a productive and fulfilling life. Thus, in making foster- care placements, amici strive to ensure that children are placed in the most stable, supportive, and loving homes available, not just minimally suitable ones, so they can thrive and ultimately contribute to society. To achieve that goal, amici must seek out as many well-qualified foster parents as possible. There is a critical shortage of foster homes, with many families discontinuing fostering within the first few months,14 and foster parents often asked to provide homes for more youth than they deem optimal and eventually burning out. Amici can scarcely afford the potential loss of qualified foster parents who would be turned away by a provider with a religious objection, based on traits that amici have determined bear no rela-

12 See, e.g., N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Become a Foster or Adoptive Parent, archived at https://perma.cc/X4L4- 6UHV (stating that foster-care agency will approve prospective parent’s application to foster a child); Cty. of Santa Clara, Soc. Servs. Agency, archived at https://perma.cc/EC9E-CE42 (listing private therapeutic foster-care service providers). 13 See N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Foster Care Statistics for FY19, archived at https://perma.cc/RCC5-37HJ. 14 K.W. Rhodes, et al., Foster Family Resources, Psychosocial Functioning, and Retention, 27 Soc. Work Research 135, 135 (2003).

10 tionship to individuals’ suitability to be foster par- ents. Thus, in New York City, for instance, every private provider must ensure that “all qualified prospective foster or adoptive parents who wish to provide homes to children and youth in care have the opportunity to do so without discrimination,” includ- ing discrimination on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.15 Same-sex couples represent an especially key popu- lation to reach and welcome into amici’s foster-care programs. Same-sex couples are seven times more likely to raise adopted or foster children than differ- ent-sex couples and are also more likely to adopt older children and children with special needs, who are statistically less likely to be adopted.16 Nondis- crimination also protects a substantial portion of the children in amici’s care, as around one-fifth of youth in the Nation’s foster-care systems identify as lesbi- an, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ).17

15 N.Y.C. Admin. for Children’s Servs., Guidance #2008/05, archived at https://perma.cc/935R-LXSJ; see also Cal. Wel. & Inst. Code § 16013 (barring discrimination, including on the grounds of race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation, against “all persons engaged in providing care and services to foster children”). 16 See Shoshana K. Goldberg & Kerith J. Conron, Williams Inst., How Many Same-Sex Couples in the U.S. Are Raising Children? (July 2018), archived at https://perma.cc/DRN3- QAHK; David M. Brodzinsky, Expanding Resources for Chil- dren III: Research-Based Best Practices in Adoption by Gays and Lesbians 8 (Oct. 2011). 17 Bianca D. M. Wilson et al., Williams Inst., Sexual & Gender Minority Youth in Foster Care: Assessing Disproportionality and Disparities in Los Angeles 6 (2014), archived at https://perma.cc/LPR6-S298; Megan Martin et al., Ctr. for the Study of Soc. Pol’y, Out of the Shadows: Supporting LGBTQ

11 Where nearly 500,000 children are in foster care nationwide,18 nondiscrimination helps maximize the pool of prospective parents who can provide loving homes, and helps ensure that amici can continue to meet the needs of all children in their care as effec- tively as possible. 2. Similarly, nondiscrimination helps local gov- ernments maximize use of shelters by persons expe- riencing homelessness. Many amici provide shelter services by contracting with private entities. The City of Chicago, for instance, contracts with 29 providers at 50 sites to offer 3,000 shelter beds and requires providers operating shelters to keep families together, regardless of whether a family includes same-sex partners or an unmarried couple with children.19 And the City of New York contracts with over 20 private entities, including many faith-based organizations, to run shelters and provide beds in the city, where, in July of this year, over 55,000 people, including over 10,000 families with children, were in shelters.20 Contracting with private entities for the operation of the city’s shelters helps conserve limited taxpayer dollars, and working with these

Youth in Child Welfare Through Cross-System Collaboration 7 (2016), archived at https://perma.cc/TFF6-VJAU. 18 U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., The AFCARS Report 1 (2017), archived at https://perma.cc/E3EN-3TB2. 19 Chi. Dep’t of Family & Support Servs., Homeless Services 13, archived at https://perma.cc/VLT7-ZZ86; Chi. Dep’t of Family & Support Servs., Shelter, archived at https://perma.cc/MSD6-BDXF. 20 N.Y.C. Dep’t of Homeless Servs. Daily Report, archived at https://perma.cc/STH6-8SKW; N.Y.C. Dep’t of Homeless Servs., Providers, archived at https://perma.cc/MJ94-WHJ5.

12 entities enables the city to more rapidly deploy resources when individuals experience homelessness or when changing weather conditions make it espe- cially dangerous for people to be living on the street. Nondiscrimination by shelter operators signals to homeless individuals—among those most in need of support in amici’s communities—that they are welcome. This signal may be important to individu- als who do not share a provider’s religious affiliation and worry that they will not be accommodated, or will be made to feel uncomfortable if they are taken in. And it is especially important for shelters to welcome LGBTQ people, who face systemic barriers to obtaining stable housing and comprise a dispro- portionate share of the homeless population. For instance, in New York City alone, more than one- sixth of LGBTQ residents have experienced home- lessness.21 Additionally, 40% of the Nation’s home- less youth identify as LGBTQ.22 Transgender people are particularly likely to avoid shelters that fail to respect their gender identity; lack safe access to basic facilities and necessary medical care; or permit bullying or harassment.23 For

21 S. Frazer & E.E. Howe, The LGBT Cmty. Ctr., LGBT Health and Human Services Needs in New York State 19 (2016), archived at https://perma.cc/M6TWPAMB. 22 See L.A. Hunter et al., Soc. Justice Sexuality Project, CUNY, Intersecting Injustice: Addressing LGBTQ Poverty and Economic Justice for All 5 (2018), archived at https://perma.cc/TAJ9-KD8R. 23 See, e.g., Richard Bränström & John E. Pachankis, Reduction in Mental Health Treatment Utilization Among Transgender Individuals After Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Total Popula- tion Study, 177 Am. J. Psych. 727, 727 (2020) (observing that transgender individuals are at higher risk of psychological

13 transgender people experiencing homelessness, as for anyone facing that circumstance, safe access to clean bathrooms and working showers at a shelter may be their only option to fulfill basic human needs. And according to a national survey of transgender people, 30% of respondents experienced homeless- ness at some point in their lives, 26% who were homeless in 2015 avoided staying in a shelter for fear of discrimination, and 70% of those who stayed in shelters that year reported such discrimination. 24 Given these stark numbers, amici must be able to know that any facility it contracts with will be able to provide shelter or services to LGBTQ people in need. 3. Nondiscrimination requirements also facilitate access to rehabilitation and reentry services for formerly incarcerated persons—another area where trust is fragile and effective delivery of services can be critical. Some amici contract with community- based organizations to provide these services, which run the gamut from substance-abuse treatment, anger-management training, and therapy, to educa- tion services and job training, transportation, con- nection to child-care options, and assistance with enrolling in benefit programs.25 Nondiscrimination is

distress due to “stigma-related stress” and “stress associated with a lack of gender affirmation”). 24 S.E. James, et al., Nat’l Ctr. for Transgender Equality, The Report of the 2015 Transgender Survey 176 (2015), archived at https://perma.cc/AE4A-QQ9Z. 25 See, e.g., S.F. Adult Probation Dep’t, Catalog of Reentry Services Funded by SFAPD, archived at https://perma.cc/LN4E-KDBU; N.Y.C. Dep’t of Citywide Administrative Servs., The City Record Online, Solicitation for Jail to Jobs Re-entry Program, available at https://a856- cityrecord.nyc.gov/RequestDetail/20171002003 (last visited Aug. 16,

14 essential when amici contract to provide these ser- vices. Opening the door to providers’ religious ex- emptions would frustrate the project of getting aid to those most in need. For instance, it would frustrate the goal of reentry for a private provider to refuse to assist a client in identifying transitional or permanent housing be- cause the client is unmarried and seeks to live with a partner or because of the client’s sexual orientation or gender identity. And many individuals returning to society require therapy or counseling services, which call for a compassionate understanding of the person’s life, background, and circumstances. LGBTQ clients in particular, who in many instances have faced rejection by their families and discrimina- tion in society, could be discouraged from seeking vital services by a counselor who denies the validity of their sexual orientation or gender identity or sends them elsewhere for services. Persons returning to society after a period of incar- ceration already face substantial obstacles to reentry, which would only increase if a provider based in their community, or the one with the best programming for their particular needs, could turn them away. Nondiscrimination thus helps those reentering amici’s communities following a period of incarceration by connecting them with education, jobs, and support. These services do not just benefit the recipients; they help make our communities safer

2020); N.Y.C. Dep’t of Citywide Administrative Servs., The City Record Online, Solicitation for In-Home Therapy Program, available at https://a856-cityrecord.nyc.gov/RequestDetail/20190422023 (last visited Aug. 16, 2020).

15 and stronger by reducing recidivism and cycles of incarceration 4. As these examples illustrate, permitting con- tractors to opt out of providing services to certain members of the community would exacerbate the challenges that local governments already confront in delivering many of those services. To take one example, local governments face myriad tests in meeting the needs of individuals and families experi- encing homelessness, including finding suitable locations for homeless shelters near where clients work, go to school, and have important support structures; maintaining an adequate supply of bed space; keeping conditions safe for residents; and providing wrap-around services such as counseling, life skills, job training, and help finding permanent housing. 26 In New York City, for instance, where availability of suitable permanent homes can be exceptionally tight, matching individuals and fami- lies who have lost their housing with appropriate services or temporary shelter beds is a daily exercise in multidimensional chess. Adding religious exemp- tions by private contractors to the mix would amplify the level of complexity by fragmenting delivery of services not only by contractor but also by location, requiring local governments to figure out how to link persons in need with other providers willing to serve them, lest they slip through the cracks.

26 See, e.g., Nat’l Alliance To End Homelessness, Many Western and Southern States Lack Sufficient Shelter Capacity for Individual Homeless Adults (Apr. 24, 2019), archived at https://perma.cc/2NHZ-BA2Y.

16 Additionally, it would not always even be possible for a local government to fill gaps in coverage created by exemptions for religious contractors. In certain parts of the country or in some smaller jurisdictions, given the sparse population, there is only one con- tracted service provider. In Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, for instance, some counties have only a single pro- vider of foster-care services: Catholic Social Services of the Upper Peninsula.27 In these communities, same-sex couples could end up with no place to turn to become foster parents. Claims of exclusion of this kind have already arisen. See, e.g., Marouf v. Azar, 391 F. Supp. 3d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2019) (same-sex couple unable to foster unaccompanied refugee child because religious service provider was only available agency near Fort Worth); see also Rogers v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 6:19-cv-01567-TMC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148885, at *25–26 (D.S.C. May 8, 2020) (discussing allegation that faith-based child- placement agency’s discrimination against same-sex couples denied plaintiffs access to “the largest and most well-resourced [agency] in the state” with “substantial government funding” that allowed it to “provide comprehensive support to foster families”). The requirement not to discriminate in the perfor- mance of a government contract is thus directly tied to the effective delivery of essential public services.

27 See Mich. Adoption Res. Exch., Mich. Adoption & Foster Care Agencies by Cty., archived at https://perma.cc/QDB9-GK29.

17 IV. Petitioners’ position could affect nearly every aspect of public services offered through public–private partnerships. The exemption that petitioners seek would have widespread implications for amici’s use of contractors because it cannot be limited to objections to same-sex couples or to social services like foster care. Because local governments may not evaluate “the relative merits” of the religious beliefs of the members of their diverse communities, Emp’t Div., Dep’t of Human Res. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 887 (1990), no limiting principle would prevent contractors from lodging religious objections to a broad range of neutral, generally applicable contract requirements. And the scope of potential objections would be even broader if exemptions could be made not just by religiously affiliated providers, but also by unaffiliat- ed providers with religious convictions. Cf. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682, 719 (2014) (for-profit corporation may assert violation of religious rights under Religious Freedom Restoration Act). For one thing, a ruling in petitioners’ favor would open the door to claims for exemptions from provid- ers unwilling to serve any number of groups within our diverse communities. Similar claims of religious liberty have already been made regarding protected characteristics other than LGBTQ status. See, e.g., Bob Jones Univ. v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 580, (1983) (discussing university sponsors’ religious opposition to interracial dating and marriage); Newman v. Piggie Park Enters., Inc., 390 U.S. 400, 402 n.5 (1968) (per curiam) (addressing barbeque vendor’s asserted religious objection to serving black customers); Maddonna v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 6:19-cv-03551-TMC, ECF No. 43,

18 at 8–9 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2020) (discussing allegation that foster-care agency would serve only evangelical Protestant Christians and had turned away plaintiff because she is Catholic); Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 874 P.2d 274, 276 (Alaska 1994) (enforcing state and local nondiscrimination laws against landlord who refused to rent to unmar- ried couple on basis of religious beliefs). Religious objections could also reach a wide range of services that local governments provide through contracts with private parties. For instance, some amici contract with private entities to provide trans- portation.28 Those amici should not have to accom- modate a private bus operator’s religious objection to close physical proximity between unmarried men and women by allowing the operator to mandate separate seating for male and female passengers. Some amici rely on private contractors to perform emergency repairs 24/7 when they receive reports of unsafe conditions in apartments.29 It would be infea- sible to allow a contractor to refuse to do this time- sensitive work on the Sabbath. Some amici contract to offer after-school programs, cultural programs, or anti-gang initiatives in schools. Those amici should not have to accommodate the contracting instructors’ religious objections to the messages amici wish them to convey. And where many amici fund shelters or

28 See, e.g., Stephen L. Reich & Janet L. Davis, Nat’l Ctr. for Transit Research, Univ. of S. Fla., Analysis of Contracting for Fixed Route Bus Service vi (June 2011), archived at https://perma.cc/P9KK-V363. 29 See, e.g., N.Y.C. Dep’t of Hous. Preservation & Dev., Emergency Repair Program, archived at https://perma.cc/WJ2D-QVAS.

19 group homes run by private contractors, access to transitional housing should not be conditioned on prayer or adherence to the provider’s religious be- liefs. Cf. Teen Ranch, Inc. v. Udow, 479 F.3d 403, 406–07 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1039 (2007) (state agency responsible for foster children discon- tinued referring children to religious provider that “coerced” participation in religious activities). Given the diversity of faith and identity in many of amici’s communities, the full impact of petitioners’ position is difficult to foresee. Though the obligation not to discriminate in the performance of some of these services would likely satisfy even strict scruti- ny, requiring amici to justify the application of neutral, generally applicable policies on a case-by- case basis would be unduly burdensome and would stymie the provision of services. See Smith, 494 U.S. at 888 (“[W]e cannot afford the luxury of deeming presumptively invalid, as applied to the religious objector, every regulation of conduct that does not protect an interest of the highest order.”). * * * For all these reasons, a ruling in petitioners’ favor could prompt local governments across the country to pull back from partnering with private parties for the provision of government services. This change would undermine the significant benefits of these partnerships, raising costs to the taxpayer, removing opportunities for innovation and competition, and inhibiting the responsiveness, participation, and engagement that flows from involving a variety of community-based organizations in serving amici’s diverse communities.

20 CONCLUSION The judgment of the court of appeals should be affirmed.

Respectfully submitted,

JAMES E. JOHNSON Corporation Counsel RICHARD DEARING Counsel of Record CLAUDE S. PLATTON LORENZO DI SILVIO New York City Law Department 100 Church Street New York, NY 10007 (212) 356-2500 [email protected]

(Additional counsel listed in Appendix)

AUGUST 2020

APPENDIX 21 APPENDIX

EVE V. BELFANCE YIBIN SHEN Director of Law City Attorney 161 S. High Street, City of Alameda Suite 202 2263 Santa Clara Akron, OH 44308 Avenue, Room 280 Attorney for City of Alameda, CA 94501 Akron, Ohio Attorney for City of Alameda, California

MARISA A. FRANCHINI ESTEBAN A. AGUILAR, JR. Corporation Counsel City Attorney City of Albany One Civic Plaza N.W. 24 Eagle Street 4th Floor, Room 4072 Albany, NY 12207 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Attorney for Mayor Kathy Attorney for City of Sheehan and City of Albuquerque, New Mexico Albany, New York

JOANNA C. ANDERSON BRAD R. BRANHAM City Attorney City Attorney 301 King Street, P.O. Box 7148 Suite 1300 Asheville, NC 28802 Alexandria, VA 22304 Attorney for Mayor Attorney for Mayor Esther Manheimer, City Justin Wilson and City of of Asheville, North Alexandria, Virginia Carolina

22 NINA R. HICKSON ANNE L. MORGAN City Attorney City Attorney Department of Law P.O. Box 1546 55 Trinity Avenue S.W., Austin, TX 78701 Suite 5000 Attorney for City of Atlanta, GA 30303 Austin, Texas Attorney for City of Atlanta, Georgia

DANA P. MOORE FARIMAH FAIZ BROWN Acting City Solicitor City Attorney 100 N. Holliday Street, 2180 Milvia Street, Suite 101 4th Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Berkeley, CA 94704 Attorney for Mayor and Attorney for City of City Council of Berkeley, California Baltimore, Maryland

JAYME B. SULLIVAN THOMAS A. CARR City Attorney City Attorney Office of City Attorney P.O. Box 791 150 N. Capitol Boulevard 1777 Broadway P.O. Box 500 Boulder, CO 80302 Boise, ID 83701 Attorney for Mayor Sam Attorney for City of Boise, Weaver and City of Idaho Boulder, Colorado

23 KENNETH W. GORDON EILEEN M. BLACKWOOD Town Attorney City Attorney & 1039 Monroe Avenue Corporation Counsel Rochester, NY 14620 City Hall Attorney for Town of 149 Church Street Brighton, New York Burlington, VT 05401 Attorney for Mayor Miro Weinberger, City of Burlington, Vermont

NANCY E. GLOWA KEITH O. BRENNEMAN City Solicitor Law Office of Keith O. 795 Massachusetts Brenneman, P.C. Avenue 44 West Main Street Cambridge, MA 02139 Mechanicsburg, PA Attorney for City of 17055 Cambridge, Attorney for Mayor Massachusetts Timothy A. Scott and Borough of Carlisle, Pennsylvania

G. NICHOLAS HERMAN MATTHEW JERZYK General Counsel City Solicitor The Brough Law Firm, 580 Broad Street PLLC Central Falls, RI 02863 1526 E. Franklin Street, Attorney for Mayor Suite 200 James Diossa and City of Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Central Falls, Rhode Attorney for Mayor Lydia Island Lavelle and Town of Carrboro, North Carolina

24 FREDERICK STAVINS RALPH D. KARPINOS City Attorney Town Attorney 102 N. Neil Street 405 Martin Luther Champaign, IL 61820 King Jr. Boulevard Attorney for Mayor Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Deborah Frank Feinen Attorney for Mayor and City of Champaign, Pamela S. Hemminger, Illinois Chapel Hill, North Carolina

JANIE E. BORDEN MARK A. FLESSNER Assistant Corporation Corporation Counsel Counsel BENNA RUTH SOLOMON 50 Broad Street Deputy Corporation Charleston, SC 29401 Counsel Attorney for Mayor John REBECCA HIRSCH J. Tecklenburg and City Assistant Corporation of Charleston, South Counsel Carolina 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 Attorneys for Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot and City of Chicago, Illinois

ANDREW W. GARTH ALISHA PATTERSON Interim City Solicitor Rutan & Tucker, LLP 801 Plum Street, 611 Anton Boulevard, Room 214 14th Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attorney for Mayor John Attorney for City of Cranley and City of Claremont, California Cincinnati, Ohio

25 BARBARA A. LANGHENRY WILLIAM R. HANNA Law Director Director of Law City of Cleveland 40 Severance Circle 601 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland Heights, Room 106 OH 44118 Cleveland, OH 44114 Attorney for City of Attorney for City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio

SUELLEN M. FERGUSON ZACH KLEIN 125 West Street, City Attorney Fourth Floor 77 North Front Street, Annapolis, MD 21401 4th Floor Attorney for City of Columbus, OH 43215 College Park, Maryland Attorney for City of Columbus, Ohio

JESSICA M. SCHELLER MIRIAM SOLER RAMOS Chief, Advice, Business City Attorney & Complex Litigation 405 Biltmore Way, Division 2nd Floor Cook County State’s Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attorney’s Office Attorney for City of Coral 500 Richard J. Daley Gables, Florida Center Chicago, IL 60602 Attorney for Cook County, Illinois

26 GREGORY G. HUTH CHRISTOPHER J. CASO Law Director City Attorney 2079 E. 9th Street, 1500 Marilla Street, 7DN Suite 7-100 Dallas, TX 75201 Cleveland, OH 44115 Attorney for Mayor Eric Attorney for Cuyahoga Johnson and City of County, Ohio Dallas, Texas

KRISTIN M. BRONSON LAWRENCE GARCIA City Attorney Corporation Counsel 1437 Bannock Street, 2 Woodward, Suite 500 Room 353 Detroit, MI 48226 Denver, CO 80202 Attorney for Mayor Mike Attorney for City and Duggan and City of County of Denver, Detroit, Michigan Colorado

STEPHEN P. ZOLLINGER REBECCA ST. GEORGE Driggs City Attorney City Attorney P.O. Box 280 411 W. First Street Rexburg, ID 83440 Duluth, MN 55804 Attorney for Mayor Attorney for Mayor Emily Hyrum F. Johnson and Larson and City of City of Driggs, Idaho Duluth, Minnesota

KIMBERLY M. REHBERG THOMAS M. YEADON City Attorney City Attorney 101 City Hall Plaza McGinty, Hitch, Person, Durham, NC 27701 Yeadon & Anderson Attorney for Mayor Steve 601 Abbot Road Schewel, City of Durham, East Lansing, MI 48823 North Carolina Attorney for Mayor Aaron Stephens and City of East Lansing, Michigan

27 KELLEY A. GANDURSKI DAVID HALL Corporation Counsel City Attorney Law Department 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Morton Civic Center Suite 10A 2100 Ridge Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Evanston, IL 60201 Attorney for Mayor Attorney for City of Cassie Franklin, City of Evanston, Illinois Everett, Washington

P. DANIEL CHRIST ANGELA WHEELER City Attorney City Attorney 2055 Orchard Lake Road 1101 S. Saginaw Street Sylvan Lake, MI 48320 Flint, MI 48502 Attorney for City of Attorney for City of Flint, Ferndale, Michigan Michigan

DAVID S. WILLIAMSON TODD K. POUNDS City Attorney City Solicitor Williamson & Hayashi 11414 Livingston Road 1650 38th Street, Fort Washington, Suite 103W MD 20744 Boulder, CO 80301 Attorney for Mayor Colin Attorney for City of Byrd, City of Greenbelt, Golden, Colorado Maryland

JENNIFER MERINO HOWARD G. RIFKIN City Attorney Corporation Counsel 400 S. Federal Highway 550 Main Street, Hallandale Beach, Room 210 FL 33009 Hartford, CT 06103 Attorney for Mayor Joy F. Attorney for City of Cooper and City of Hartford, Connecticut Hallandale Beach, Florida

28 REBECCA W. GEISER MICHAEL LAWSON Kilkenny Law, LLC City Attorney 519 Swede Street 777 B Street Norristown, PA 19401 Hayward, CA 94541 Attorney for Hatboro Attorney for Mayor Borough, Pennsylvania Barbara Halliday, Members of the City Council and City of Hayward, California

ROBERT E. HORNIK, JR. TASHA MARSHALL The Brough Law Firm, Assistant City Solicitor PLLC Law Department 1526 E. Franklin Street, 20 Korean Veterans Suite 200 Plaza, Room 204 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Holyoke, MA 01040 Attorney for Town of Attorney for Mayor Hillsborough, North Alex Morse and City of Carolina Holyoke, Massachusetts

PAUL S. AOKI RONALD C. LEWIS Corporation Counsel City Attorney Designate Legal Department 530 South King Street 900 Bagby Street, Honolulu, HI 96813 4th Floor Attorney for City and Houston, Texas 77002 County of Honolulu, Attorney for City of Hawaii Houston, Texas

29 ELEANOR M. DILKES MATTHEW M. HAGERTY City Attorney City Attorney 410 E. Washington 161 W. Michigan Ave Street Jackson, MI 49201 Iowa City, IA 52240 Attorney for Mayor Derek Attorney for Mayor Bruce J. Dobies, City of Teague and City of Iowa Jackson, Michigan City, Iowa

CLYDE J. ROBINSON MATT GIGLIOTTI City Attorney Acting City Attorney 241 W. South Street 414 E. 12th Street, 2300 Kalamazoo, MI 49007 City Hall Attorney for Mayor David Kansas City, MO 64106 Anderson, City of Attorney for Mayor Kalamazoo, Michigan Quinton Lucas and City of Kansas City, Missouri

SHAWN D. SMITH HOWARD PHILLIP City Attorney SCHNEIDERMAN 1300 White Street Senior Deputy Key West, FL 33040 Prosecuting Attorney Attorney for City of Key King County Prosecuting West, Florida Attorney’s Office 516 3rd Avenue, W400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attorney for King County, Washington & Public Health – Seattle & King County

30 CHARLES W. SWANSON JENNIFER VEGA-BROWN Law Director City Attorney P.O. Box 1631 700 N. Main Street, Knoxville, TN 37901 Suite 3200 Attorney for Mayor Indya Las Cruces, NM 88004 Kincannon, City of Knox- Attorney for Mayor Ken ville, Tennessee Miyagishima, City of Las Cruces, New Mexico

CHARLES PARKIN MICHAEL N. FEUER City Attorney City Attorney 411 W. Ocean Boulevard, KATHLEEN A. KENEALY 9th Floor Chief Assistant City Long Beach, CA 90802 Attorney Attorney for City of Long SCOTT MARCUS Beach, California Senior Assistant City Attorney BLITHE SMITH BOCK Managing Attorney, Civil Appellate Division 200 N. Main Street, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorneys for City of Los Angeles, California

31 MARY C. WICKHAM E. JEFFREY MOSLEY County Counsel General Counsel SCOTT KUHN 527 W. Jefferson Street Assistant County Louisville, KY 40202 Counsel Attorney for CESAR DEL PERAL Louisville/Jefferson Senior Deputy County County Metro Counsel Government, Kentucky KATHERINE G. MCKEON Deputy County Counsel 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attorneys for County of Los Angeles, California

MICHAEL HAAS ROGER J. DESIDERIO City Attorney Township Attorney 210 Martin Luther King 574 Valley Street Jr. Boulevard, Room 401 Township of Madison, WI 53703 Maplewood, NJ 07040 Attorney for City of Attorney for Mayor Frank Madison, Wisconsin McGehee and Township of Maplewood, New Jersey

BRIAN E. WASHINGTON ROBERT J. VAN CAMPEN County Counsel City Solicitor 3501 Civic Center Drive, City of Melrose Suite 275 562 Main Street San Rafael, CA 94903 Melrose, MA 02176 Attorney for Marin Attorney for Mayor Paul County, California Brodeur, City of Melrose, Massachusetts

32 RAUL J. AGUILA ERIK A. NILSSON City Attorney Interim City Attorney 1700 Convention City Hall, Room 210 Center Drive 350 S. Fifth Street Miami Beach, Minneapolis, MN 55415 Florida 33139 Attorney for City of Attorney for Mayor Dan Minneapolis, Minnesota Gelber and City of Miami Beach, Florida

KATHLEEN E. GILL SEAN P. KILKENNY Chief of Staff for Policy Municipal Solicitor and Government Affairs 519 Swede Street & Corporation Counsel Norristown, PA 19401 City of New Rochelle Attorney for Municipality 515 North Avenue of Norristown, New Rochelle, NY 10801 Pennsylvania Attorney for City of New Rochelle, New York

BARBARA J. PARKER MARK EDWARD BARBER City Attorney Olympia City Attorney One Frank Ogawa Plaza, 601 4th Ave E. Sixth Floor P.O. Box 1967 Oakland, CA 94612 Olympia, WA 98507 Attorney for City of Attorney for Mayor Oakland, California Cheryl Selby and City of Olympia, Washington

33 JEFFREY S. BALLINGER YVONNE S. HILTON City Attorney City Solicitor 3200 E. Tahquitz City-County Building Canyon Way 414 Grant Street Palm Springs, CA 92262 Pittsburgh, PA 15217 Attorney for City of Palm Attorney for City of Springs, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

TRACY REEVE JEFFREY DANA City Attorney City Solicitor 1221 S.W. Fourth 444 Westminster Street, Avenue, Room 430 Suite 220 Portland, OR 97204 Providence, RI 02903 Attorney for City of Attorney for City of Portland, Oregon Providence, Rhode Island

ANGELA LOHAN JASON T. LOOS Law Director City Attorney 3382 Glenwood 201 S.E. Fourth Street, Boulevard Room 247 Reminderville, OH 44202 Rochester, MN 55904 Attorney for Mayor Sam Attorney for Mayor Kim Alonso, Village of Norton, City of Rochester, Reminderville, Ohio Minnesota

NICHOLAS O. MEYER STEVEN E. MAUER Legal Director City Attorney 425 E. State Street Mauer Law Firm, P.C. Rockford, IL 61104 1100 Main Street, Attorney for Mayor Suite 2100 Thomas P. McNamara Kansas City, MO 64105 and City of Rockford, Attorney for Mayor Mike Illinois Kelly, City of Roeland Park, Kansas

34 DAVID W. GILLAM SUSANA ALCALA WOOD City Attorney City Attorney 203 S. Troy Street 915 I Street, Royal Oak, Fourth Floor Michigan 48067 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attorney for City of Royal Attorney for City of Oak, Michigan Sacramento, California

LYNDSEY M. OLSON ELIZABETH RENNARD City Attorney City Solicitor 400 City Hall & 93 Washington Street Court House Salem, MA 01970 15 West Kellogg Attorney for Mayor Boulevard Kimberley Driscoll, City Saint Paul, MN 55102 of Salem, Massachusetts Attorney for City of Saint Paul, Minnesota

KATHERINE N. LEWIS DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney City Attorney 451 South State Street, City Hall Room 234 Suite 505A One Dr. Carlton B. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Goodlett Place Attorney for Salt Lake San Francisco, CA 94102 City Corporation, Utah Attorney for Mayor London Breed and City and County of San Francisco, California

35 RICHARD D. PIO RODA JAMES R. WILLIAMS City Attorney County Counsel City Hall 70 W. Hedding Street, 835 E. 14th Street East Wing, 9th Floor San Leandro, CA 94577 San Jose, CA 95110 Attorney for Mayor Attorney for County of Pauline Russo Cutter, Santa Clara, California Members of the City Council, and City of San Leandro, California

ANTHONY P. CONDOTTI ERIN K. MCSHERRY City Attorney City Attorney Atchison, Barisone & 200 Lincoln Avenue Condotti, PC Santa Fe, NM 87504 P.O. Box 481 Attorney for City of Santa Santa Cruz, CA 95061 Fe, New Mexico Attorney for Mayor Justin Cummings and City of Santa Cruz, California

GEORGE S. CARDONA PETER S. HOLMES Interim City Attorney City Attorney 1685 Main Street, 701 Fifth Avenue, 3rd Floor Suite 2050 Los Angeles, CA 90401 Seattle, WA 98104 Attorney for City of Santa Attorney for Mayor Jenny Monica, California Durkan and City of Seattle, Washington

36 RONALD M. BOLT FRANCIS X. WRIGHT, JR. Bolt Legal, LLC City Solicitor 8 Executive Park Court 93 Highland Avenue Germantown, MD 20874 Somerville, MA 02143 Attorney for Mayor Attorney for City of Jeffrey Z. Slavin, Town of Somerville, Somerset, Maryland Massachusetts

STEPHANIE STEELE EDWARD M. PIKULA Corporation Counsel City Solicitor 227 W. Jefferson 36 Court Street, Boulevard, Suite 1200S Room 210 South Bend, IN 46601 Springfield, MA 01103 Attorney for City of South Attorney for Mayor Bend, Indiana Domenic J. Sarno and City of Springfield, Massachusetts

KATHRYN EMMETT KRISTEN E. SMITH Director of Legal Affairs Corporation Counsel & Corporation Counsel City of Syracuse 888 Washington 233 E. Washington Boulevard Street, Suite 300 Stamford, CT 06901 Syracuse, NY 13202 Attorney for Mayor David Attorney for Mayor Ben R. Martin, City of Walsh and City of Stamford, Connecticut Syracuse, New York

37 JUDI BAUMANN JOHN MORELLI City Attorney Director of Law 21 E. Sixth Street, 319 East State Street Suite 201 Trenton, NJ 08608 Tempe, AZ 85281 Attorney for Mayor W. Attorney for Mayor Corey Reed Gusciora and City D. Woods and City of of Trenton, New Jersey Tempe, Arizona

MIKE RANKIN BETSY CAVENDISH City Attorney General Counsel P.O. Box 27210 John A. Wilson Building, Tucson, AZ 85726 Suite 300 Attorney for City of 1350 Pennsylvania Tucson, Arizona Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Attorney for Mayor Muriel Bowser, Washington, DC

MICHELLE K. BILLARD MICHAEL JENKINS Corporation Counsel City Attorney 220 N. Main Street Best Best & Krieger LLP P.O. Box 8645 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48107 Suite 110 Attorney for Washtenaw Manhattan Beach, County, Michigan CA 90266 Attorney for Mayor Lindsey Horvath and City of West Hollywood, California

38 ERIC H. BURNS TIMOTHY V. RAMIS Corporation Counsel West Linn City Attorney 8 N. 3rd Street, Suite 401 Jordan Ramis PC Lafayette, IN 47902 Two Centerpointe Drive, Attorney for City of West 6th Floor Lafayette, Indiana Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Attorney for Mayor Russell B. Axelrod, City of West Linn, Oregon

KIMBERLY ROTHENBURG JEFFREY MITCHELL City Attorney City Attorney 401 Clematis Street, Kronick, Moskovitz, 5th Floor Tiedemann & Girard West Palm Beach, 400 Capitol Mall, FL 33401 27th Floor Attorney for Mayor Keith Sacramento, CA 95814 A. James and City of Attorney for City of West West Palm Beach, Sacramento, California Florida

ROBERT M. GOFF, JR. KERRY L. EZROL City Solicitor Goren Cherof Doody & 800 N. King Street Ezrol P.A. Wilmington, DE 19801 3099 E. Commercial Attorney for Mayor Boulevard, Suite 200 Michael S. Purzycki, City Fort Lauderdale, of Wilmington, Delaware FL 33308 Attorney for Acting Mayor Tom Green and City of Wilton Manors, Florida

39 BREANNE N. PARCELS JOHN DANIEL REAVES Village Solicitor General Counsel 100 Dayton Street 1200 New Hampshire Yellow Springs, Avenue N.W. OH 45387 Washington, DC 20036 Attorney for Mayor Pam Attorney for the U.S. Conine, Village of Yellow Conference of Mayors Springs, Ohio

JONATHAN B. MILLER LIJIA GONG Public Rights Project 4096 Piedmont Avenue #149 Oakland, CA 94611 Attorneys for Mayor Tari Renner, City of Bloomington, Illinois Mayor Patrick L. Wojahn, City of College Park, Maryland Mayor Joseph Geierman, City of Doraville, Georgia Mayor Ron Strouse, Borough of Doylestown, Pennsylvania Mayor Christian Patz, City of Emeryville, California Mayor Jeremy Gordon, City of Falls City, Oregon Mayor Pete Muldoon, Town of Jackson, Wyoming Mayor Sean Strub, Borough of Milford, Pennsylvania Mayor Geoff Kors, City of Palm Springs, California Mayor Kate Gallego, City of Phoenix, Arizona Mayor Mary-Ann Baldwin, City of Raleigh, North Carolina Mayor Tom Butt, City of Richmond, California Mayor Michael Ryan, City of Sunrise, Florida Mayor Michelle J. Gomez, City of Tamarac, Florida Mayor Patrick J. Furey, City of Torrance, California

40 Mayor Daniel J. Corona, City of West Wendover, Nevada Mayor Brian Sager, City of Woodstock, Illinois

NEW BUSINESS CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL AT TOWN BOARD MEETING August 26, 2020

THAT THE CLAIMS NUMBERED 3830 THROUGH 4086 AS SUMMARIZED BELOW HAVING BEEN APPROVED BY THE RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENT HEADS AND AUDITED BY THE CHAIR OF THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE ARE HEREBY APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.

A - GENERAL 269,656.09

D - HIGHWAY 245,355.94

H - CAPITAL 2,934.18

L - LIBRARY 33,579.15

SF - FIRE DISTRICT 1,673.79

SL - LIGHTING DIST 24,301.09

SS - SEWER DISTRICT 68,288.40

TA - AGENCY TRUST 32,412.42

TOTAL: $678,201.06

UPON ROLL CALL MOTION CARRIED

APPROVED BY: SUPERVISOR William W. Moehle

COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER Jason DiPonzio Christopher Werner

COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER Robin Wilt Christine Corrado

TO THE SUPERVISOR:

I CERTIFY THAT THE VOUCHERS LISTED ABOVE WERE AUDITED BY THE CHAIR OF THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD ON THE ABOVE DATE AND ALLOWED IN THE AMOUNTS SHOWN. YOU ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO PAY TO EACH OF THE CLAIMANTS THE AMOUNT OPPOSITE HIS NAME.

DATE TOWN CLERK Daniel Amen

Brigtres08-26-2020-CLAIMS (Summary) TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 3830 9885 ALIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC 1US1-0407513 CUST. #993023388 - JULY SERVICES 7/6/2020 $45.00 Open ALIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC Total $45.00 3831 8889 AMAZON.COM, INC. 1TMC3DGHC4C6 HEPA AIR FILTER 7/25/2020 $160.00 Open AMAZON.COM, INC. Total $160.00 3832 7731 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT, LLC. 69278 HEAVY EQUIPMENT RENTAL 7/15/2020 $4,975.00 Open 3833 7731 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT, LLC. 69278-01 HEAVY EQUIPMENT RENTAL 7/21/2020 $268.47 Open AMERICAN EQUIPMENT, LLC. Total $5,243.47 3834 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035183575 YA BOOKS 6/4/2020 $32.63 Open 3835 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H44833730 CHILDREN'S AV 6/8/2020 $69.43 Open 3836 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H48027400 CHILDREN'S AV 6/19/2020 $48.19 Open 3837 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290645 BOOKS 6/25/2020 $324.43 Open 3838 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H48200740 CHILDREN'S AV 6/25/2020 $28.34 Open 3839 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035329840 CONTINUATIONS 6/29/2020 $21.59 Open 3840 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035330196 AV MATERIALS 6/29/2020 $144.18 Open 3841 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H48316570 CHILDREN'S AV 6/30/2020 $49.60 Open 3842 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297108 BOOKS 7/2/2020 $32.07 Open 3843 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297114 YA BOOKS 7/2/2020 $24.18 Open 3844 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297169 CHILDREN'S BOOKS 7/2/2020 $44.71 Open 3845 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035301457 YA BOOKS 7/2/2020 $502.56 Open 3846 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H48390840 CHILDREN'S AV 7/2/2020 $46.07 Open 3847 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035342279 YA SPOKEN WORD 7/6/2020 $49.48 Open 3848 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035350550 AV MATERIALS 7/9/2020 $15.94 Open 3849 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035352650 BOOKS 7/10/2020 $540.92 Open 3850 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035313707 BOOKS 7/11/2020 $1,225.47 Open 3851 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035355923 CONTINUATIONS 7/13/2020 $31.98 Open 3852 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H48682250 CHILDREN'S AV 7/14/2020 $69.45 Open 3853 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035308764 BOOKS 7/15/2020 $365.88 Open 3854 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035298071 YA BOOKS 7/16/2020 $98.82 Open 3855 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035371147 YA SPOKEN WORD 7/20/2020 $16.48 Open 3856 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035324935 YA BOOKS 7/21/2020 $106.25 Open 3857 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035324815 BOOKS 7/22/2020 $514.96 Open 3858 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035326542 BOOKS 7/22/2020 $325.68 Open 3859 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035329328 BOOKS 7/24/2020 $376.35 Open 3860 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290703 YA BOOKS 7/25/2020 $39.75 Open 3861 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297160 BOOKS 7/25/2020 $168.25 Open 3862 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035339837 BOOKS 7/25/2020 $1,421.99 Open 3863 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035347893 BOOKS 7/25/2020 $547.02 Open 3864 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035361199 BOOKS 7/25/2020 $604.71 Open 3865 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035369807 BOOKS 7/25/2020 $1,699.31 Open 3866 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290739 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $9.77 Open 3867 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290766 YA BOOKS 7/27/2020 $34.58 Open 3868 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290860 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $146.40 Open 3869 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035290999 YA BOOKS 7/27/2020 $6.64 Open 3870 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297305 YA BOOKS 7/27/2020 $13.14 Open 3871 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297328 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $16.89 Open 3872 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297437 YA BOOKS 7/27/2020 $6.64 Open 3873 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297652 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $17.47 Open

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 1 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 3874 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297723 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $81.71 Open 3875 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297818 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $25.73 Open 3876 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297900 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $15.75 Open 3877 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297948 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $22.74 Open 3878 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035297953 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $183.02 Open 3879 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035298031 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $16.89 Open 3880 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035334961 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $678.85 Open 3881 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035376436 BOOKS 7/27/2020 $633.79 Open 3882 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035385473 CONTINUATIONS 7/27/2020 $598.83 Open 3883 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035388805 AV MATERIALS 7/28/2020 $21.99 Open 3884 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. H49099230 CHILDREN'S AV 7/29/2020 $7.79 Open 3885 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035388372 BOOKS 7/30/2020 $538.15 Open 3886 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035287424 BOOKS 8/3/2020 $14.47 Open 3887 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035376396 BOOKS 8/3/2020 $284.04 Open 3888 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035394879 BOOKS 8/3/2020 $390.33 Open 3889 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035344922 BOOKS 8/5/2020 $254.09 Open 3890 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035366199 BOOKS 8/5/2020 $106.05 Open 3891 59 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 2035349849 BOOKS 8/19/2020 $0.00 Open BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. Total $13,712.42 3892 8779 BLUE LIGHTNING ENTERPRISES, LLC. 14534-1 TOWING 5/25/2020 $160.00 Open 3893 8779 BLUE LIGHTNING ENTERPRISES, LLC. 14777-1 TOWING 5/29/2020 $215.00 Open 3894 8779 BLUE LIGHTNING ENTERPRISES, LLC. 14776-1 TOWING 6/22/2020 $215.00 Open 3895 8779 BLUE LIGHTNING ENTERPRISES, LLC. 14778-1 TOWING 7/31/2020 $160.00 Open BLUE LIGHTNING ENTERPRISES, LLC. Total $750.00 3896 9456 CINTAS CORPORATION #2 4058836905 FLOOR MAT RENTAL 8/17/2020 $57.63 Open CINTAS CORPORATION #2 Total $57.63 3897 2468 PATRICK W. CLUNE 2020-00000311 TBRIT-001-97 FOR 08/10-08/23/2020 8/20/2020 $800.00 Paid by Check #16491 8/20/2020 PATRICK W. CLUNE Total $800.00 3898 129 COLONY HARDWARE CORP dba COOK IRON STORE CO., IN750198-2008 SHOP TOWELS 8/3/2020 $453.83 Open COLONY HARDWARE CORP dba COOK IRON STORE CO., INC. Total $453.83 3899 4529 CORE & MAIN LP M777703 PIPE SUPPLIES FOR FARMERS MARKET 8/4/2020 $404.04 Open 3900 4529 CORE & MAIN LP M827112 FERNCOS, PIPES & FITTINGS, VARIOUS 8/12/2020 $26.75 Open 3901 4529 CORE & MAIN LP M831055 FERNCOS, PIPES & FITTINGS, VARIOUS 8/13/2020 $37.40 Open CORE & MAIN LP Total $468.19 3902 3035 D & W DIESEL, INC. W61882 HYDRAULIC HOSES & FITTINGS 8/6/2020 $18.12 Open 3903 3035 D & W DIESEL, INC. W64355 HYDRAULIC HOSES & FITTINGS 8/11/2020 $70.56 Open D & W DIESEL, INC. Total $88.68 3904 8073 DAVIS TRAILER WORLD, LLC 105966 TRAILER PARTS, VARIOUS 8/11/2020 $326.00 Open DAVIS TRAILER WORLD, LLC Total $326.00 3905 699 DEMCO INC. 6819984 SUPPLIES 7/23/2020 $273.58 Open DEMCO INC. Total $273.58 3906 735 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, THE 2020-00000321 $2,065,000 REFUNDING BOND (2016) INTEREST DUE 9-1-20208/25/2020 $10,650.00 Paid by EFT #62 8/27/2020 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, THE Total $10,650.00 3907 153 DOLOMITE PRODUCTS CO., INC. 954483 STONE, VARIOUS 8/1/2020 $370.47 Open 3908 153 DOLOMITE PRODUCTS CO., INC. 955380 STONE, VARIOUS 8/8/2020 $1,348.74 Open DOLOMITE PRODUCTS CO., INC. Total $1,719.21

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 2 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 3909 9469 ECO GREEN PARK LTD 20569 SHREDDING SERVICES 8/14/2020 $212.00 Open ECO GREEN PARK LTD Total $212.00 3910 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156426 VEHICLE REPAIR 8/19/2020 $134.01 Open 3911 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156143 VEHICLE REPAIRS 8/5/2020 $1,479.64 Open 3912 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156398 VEHICLE REPAIR 8/11/2020 $58.55 Open 3913 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156500 VEHICLE REPAIR 8/19/2020 $492.95 Open 3914 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155678 #91 7/1/2020 $320.98 Open 3915 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155801 #125 7/8/2020 $58.23 Open 3916 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155901 #130 7/22/2020 $42.54 Open 3917 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155961 #122 7/22/2020 $54.30 Open 3918 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155992 #131 7/22/2020 $33.30 Open 3919 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156034 #120 7/22/2020 $21.00 Open 3920 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156051 #128 7/22/2020 $33.30 Open 3921 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156076 #115 7/22/2020 $33.30 Open 3922 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 155916 #121 7/25/2020 $495.93 Open 3923 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156101 #119 7/27/2020 $54.30 Open 3924 165 ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE 156186 #120 7/29/2020 $33.30 Open ELMER'S BRIGHTON GARAGE Total $3,345.63 3925 8974 ENVISIONWARE, INC. INV-US-48880 PRINT SERVICES 7/23/2020 $725.00 Open ENVISIONWARE, INC. Total $725.00 3926 71 EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD 25684161 September Medical Retirees Over 65 8/10/2020 $32,944.65 Open 3927 71 EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD 25810261 SEPTEMBER DENTAL ADMIN FEES 8/17/2020 $443.93 Open 3928 71 EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD 25810884 SEPTEMBER POLICE DENTAL ADMIN FEES 8/17/2020 $336.18 Open EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD Total $33,724.76 3929 77 EXCELLUS FSA & DENTAL 2020-00000306 FLEX SPENDING CLAIMS FOR 08/14/2020 8/14/2020 $929.95 Paid by EFT #882 8/14/2020 3930 77 EXCELLUS FSA & DENTAL 2020-00000307 DENTAL CLAIMS FOR 08/05-08/11/2020 8/14/2020 $2,772.05 Paid by EFT #883 8/14/2020 3931 77 EXCELLUS FSA & DENTAL 2020-00000308 FLEX SPENDING CLAIMS FOR 08/21/20 8/19/2020 $298.03 Paid by EFT #884 8/21/2020 3932 77 EXCELLUS FSA & DENTAL 2020-00000312 DENTAL CLAIMS FOR 08/12-08/18/2020 8/21/2020 $2,063.39 Paid by EFT #885 8/21/2020 EXCELLUS FSA & DENTAL Total $6,063.42 3933 5740 EXODUS EXTERMINATING, INC. 233190 PEST MANAGEMENT 8/6/2020 $52.53 Open EXODUS EXTERMINATING, INC. Total $52.53 3934 9262 KERRY C. FAHY-HARVICK 82020 GARDENING INSTRUCTION (5213.220) 8/20/2020 $75.60 Open KERRY C. FAHY-HARVICK Total $75.60 3935 4687 FARONICS TECHNOLOGIES USA INC. INUS0200647 MAINTENANCE RENEWAL 7/16/2020 $567.00 Open FARONICS TECHNOLOGIES USA INC. Total $567.00 3936 9371 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK 164473209 SEPTEMBER VISION PREMIUMS 8/19/2020 $481.85 Open FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK Total $481.85 3937 6625 FINDAWAY WORLD, LLC/PLAYAWAY 323108 CHILDREN'S AV 7/6/2020 $1,402.22 Open 3938 6625 FINDAWAY WORLD, LLC/PLAYAWAY 324436 CHILDREN'S AV 7/21/2020 $86.23 Open FINDAWAY WORLD, LLC/PLAYAWAY Total $1,488.45 3939 9275 FORBES COURT REPORTING SERVICES, LLC 99-2020-A SHORT PAID INVOICE 99 BY $10 6/29/2020 $10.00 Open 3940 9275 FORBES COURT REPORTING SERVICES, LLC 112 HPC MINUTE FOR 7/23/20 MEETING 8/7/2020 $335.00 Open FORBES COURT REPORTING SERVICES, LLC Total $345.00 3941 185 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 81020 TELEPHONE SERVICE - AUGUST 2020 8/10/2020 $346.62 Open 3942 185 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 081020a TELEPHONE SERVICE - AUGUST 2020 8/10/2020 $900.95 Open 3943 185 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 081020c PHONE SERVICE - AUGUST 2020 8/10/2020 $88.39 Open FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS Total $1,335.96

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 3 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 3944 9998 EVERT GARCIA 102467 3 MYLAR MAPS 8/21/2020 $53.10 Open EVERT GARCIA Total $53.10 3945 6317 GARSTON SIGN SUPPLIES, INC. 1119336-00 SIGN MAKING SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $393.85 Open GARSTON SIGN SUPPLIES, INC. Total $393.85 3946 4168 JOSEPH A GONZALEZ 2020-00000310 TBRIT-001-03 FOR 08/10-08/23/2020 8/20/2020 $800.00 Paid by Check #16492 8/20/2020 JOSEPH A GONZALEZ Total $800.00 3947 7927 GORDON & SCHAAL, LLP 80120 LEGAL SERVICES - AUGUST 2020 8/1/2020 $5,633.00 Open GORDON & SCHAAL, LLP Total $5,633.00 3948 474 GRIFFITH OIL CO., INC. 6004686 DIESEL FUEL 8/3/2020 $5,639.48 Open GRIFFITH OIL CO., INC. Total $5,639.48 3949 432 H.W. WILSON COMPANY 359087 FICTION CORE COLLECTION 7/2/2020 $265.50 Open H.W. WILSON COMPANY Total $265.50 3950 936 HANES SUPPLY, INC. 2114973-00 RIGID CAMERA PARTS 8/17/2020 $120.85 Open HANES SUPPLY, INC. Total $120.85 3951 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3767879 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 7/31/2020 $422.50 Open 3952 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3771778 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 8/7/2020 $523.65 Open 3953 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3772778 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 8/8/2020 $390.96 Open 3954 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3772779 TACK COAT 8/8/2020 $70.00 Open 3955 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3774801 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 8/12/2020 $258.80 Open 3956 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3776868 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 8/14/2020 $852.40 Open 3957 85 HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) 3777927 ASPHALT FOR PATCHING 8/15/2020 $390.96 Open HANSON AGGREGATES (B.R.DEWITT) Total $2,909.27 3958 2689 HARRIS BEACH PLLC 2387964 DOCUMENT DELIVERY FEES 8/14/2020 $57.83 Open HARRIS BEACH PLLC Total $57.83 3959 4878 HENDERSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT 317694 TRUCK/PLOW PARTS, VARIOUS 8/5/2020 $1,603.70 Open 3960 4878 HENDERSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT 317714 TRUCK/PLOW PARTS, VARIOUS 8/5/2020 $706.00 Open HENDERSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT Total $2,309.70 3961 9997 AMY HERGENRADER 22881598 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS REFUND - COVID 19 8/18/2020 $171.00 Open AMY HERGENRADER Total $171.00 3962 2306 HYNES CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, INC S14811 REPLACE GUTTERS - DANFORTH CRESCENT 7/20/2020 $123,185.98 Open HYNES CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, INC Total $123,185.98 3963 3623 INTERPRETEK 14775 INTERPRETER FOR 8/12/20 BOARD MTG & BUDGET WORKSH 8/16/2020 $472.00 Open INTERPRETEK Total $472.00 3964 1801 IROQUOIS ROCK PRODUCTS (DOLOMITE GROUP) 958494 ASPHALT FOR PAVING - BONNIE BRAE 8/1/2020 $15,959.62 Open 3965 1801 IROQUOIS ROCK PRODUCTS (DOLOMITE GROUP) 960096 ASPHALT FOR PAVING - CHELMSFORD ROAD 8/8/2020 $27,979.42 Open IROQUOIS ROCK PRODUCTS (DOLOMITE GROUP) Total $43,939.04 3966 9973 PAMELA JAMES 22881734 TOWN PARK LODGE REFUND - COVID 19 8/18/2020 $200.00 Open PAMELA JAMES Total $200.00 3967 4686 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT P34507 FLUSHER PARTS 8/13/2020 $650.00 Open JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT Total $650.00 3968 988 KLEIN STEEL SERVICE INC 1807133 WELDING STEEL 8/5/2020 $655.20 Open 3969 988 KLEIN STEEL SERVICE INC 1807916 WELDING STEEL 8/10/2020 $80.00 Open KLEIN STEEL SERVICE INC Total $735.20 3970 5034 LAKESIDE SOD SUPPLY CO., INC. 64555 MOUND CLAY 8/6/2020 $586.00 Open LAKESIDE SOD SUPPLY CO., INC. Total $586.00

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 4 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 3971 2005 LEWIS GENERAL TIRES, INC. 122566 TIRES & REPAIRS 8/4/2020 $1,203.50 Open 3972 2005 LEWIS GENERAL TIRES, INC. 122801 #128 8/11/2020 $679.60 Open LEWIS GENERAL TIRES, INC. Total $1,883.10 3973 2982 MARK LIBERATORE 44032 MARCH AND JULY 7/30/2020 $538.12 Open MARK LIBERATORE Total $538.12 3974 3197 M.E. SERVICES COMMUNICATION, INC. 72464 SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER 8/5/2020 $130.00 Open M.E. SERVICES COMMUNICATION, INC. Total $130.00 3975 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315191 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 7/29/2020 $25.49 Open 3976 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315366 MAINT. SUPPLIES 8/3/2020 $28.86 Open 3977 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315513 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $15.29 Open 3978 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315636 MAINT. SUPPLIES 8/7/2020 $9.33 Open 3979 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315750 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/10/2020 $16.80 Open 3980 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315898 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/12/2020 $30.58 Open 3981 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 315908 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/12/2020 $39.93 Open 3982 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC K161156 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/18/2020 $54.36 Open 3983 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC K161165 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8/18/2020 $128.28 Open 3984 262 MAYER HARDWARE INC 316201 AC SUPPLIES 8/18/2020 $29.72 Open MAYER HARDWARE INC Total $378.64 3985 3369 MESSENGER POST NEWSPAPERS 90103 NOTICE OF DECISIONS - HPC 7/23/2020 8/6/2020 $55.33 Open 3986 3369 MESSENGER POST NEWSPAPERS 90083 LEGAL NOTICE - PENFIELD RD PARKING 8/13/2020 $49.03 Open 3987 3369 MESSENGER POST NEWSPAPERS 90397 LEGAL NOTICE PLANNING BOARD 8/13/2020 $162.43 Open 3988 3369 MESSENGER POST NEWSPAPERS 90398 LEGAL NOTICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY 8/13/2020 $132.19 Open MESSENGER POST NEWSPAPERS Total $398.98 3989 2752 MIDWEST TAPE 99080048 CHILDREN'S AV 6/30/2020 $89.96 Open 3990 2752 MIDWEST TAPE 99109704 AV MATERIALS 7/8/2020 $14.99 Open 3991 2752 MIDWEST TAPE 99164461 AV MATERIALS 7/21/2020 $14.99 Open MIDWEST TAPE Total $119.94 3992 273 MONROE COUNTY DIRECTOR FINANCE 72620 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 7/26/2020 $150.00 Open 3993 273 MONROE COUNTY DIRECTOR FINANCE 072620a ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PERMIT - REVIEW FEE 7/26/2020 $500.00 Open 3994 273 MONROE COUNTY DIRECTOR FINANCE 1800109287 GAS CHARGES - JULY 2020 8/19/2020 $307.46 Open 3995 273 MONROE COUNTY DIRECTOR FINANCE 1800109312 ELECTRIC CHARGES - JULY 2020 8/25/2020 $43,898.63 Open MONROE COUNTY DIRECTOR FINANCE Total $44,856.09 3996 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120g WATER SERVICE - 2300 ELMWOOD 8/11/2020 $622.24 Open 3997 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 3707-1144 05-07 2020 WATER SERVICE FOR W. BRIGHTON FIRE FACILITIES 8/11/2020 $19.55 Open 3998 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 41102-8712 05-07 2020 WATER SERVICE FOR W. BRIGHTON FIRE FACILITIES 8/11/2020 $129.61 Open 3999 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 81120 WATER SERVICE - OPS CENTER 8/11/2020 $301.14 Open 4000 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120a WATER SERVICE - 12 CORNERS PARK 8/11/2020 $234.62 Open 4001 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120b WATER SERVICE - LANDFILL 8/11/2020 $32.15 Open 4002 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120c WATER SERVICE - S. CLINTON PUMP STATION 8/11/2020 $19.55 Open 4003 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120d WATER SERVICE - FARMHOUSE 8/11/2020 $205.98 Open 4004 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120e WATER SERVICE - TOWN PARK 8/11/2020 $53.88 Open 4005 277 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 081120f WATER SERVICE - MERIDIAN CENTRE 8/11/2020 $724.69 Open MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Total $2,343.41 4006 3856 MONTAGE ENTERPRISES INC. 81805 ROADSIDE MOWER PARTS 8/11/2020 $302.01 Open MONTAGE ENTERPRISES INC. Total $302.01

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 5 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 4007 379 MVP HEALTH CARE, INC. 13927977 Retrees Over 65 Medical Invoice for September 8/8/2020 $5,305.00 Open 4008 379 MVP HEALTH CARE, INC. 13952587 September MVP PPO Invoice 8/8/2020 $225,679.03 Open MVP HEALTH CARE, INC. Total $230,984.03 4009 6933 NCH CORPORATION 7054293 LUBRICANTS 8/5/2020 $298.00 Open NCH CORPORATION Total $298.00 4010 5721 NYS TEAMSTERS COUNCIL 2020-00000309 TEAMSTERS SEPTEMBER MED PREMIUMS 8/19/2020 $7,757.82 Open NYS TEAMSTERS COUNCIL Total $7,757.82 4011 326 OIL FILTER SERVICE INC 33105 VEHICLE FILTERS 8/4/2020 $235.40 Open OIL FILTER SERVICE INC Total $235.40 4012 7613 OVERDRIVE, INC. 01327DA20219341 AUDIO/E-BOOKS 7/7/2020 $127.47 Open 4013 7613 OVERDRIVE, INC. 01327DA20225220 AUDIO/E-BOOKS 7/14/2020 $161.47 Open 4014 7613 OVERDRIVE, INC. 01327DA20231530 AUDIO/E-BOOKS 7/21/2020 $55.99 Open OVERDRIVE, INC. Total $344.93 4015 8090 P & D THURSTON CO. INC. 2973 SHEARING & BREAKING 8/5/2020 $170.00 Open P & D THURSTON CO. INC. Total $170.00 4016 8118 PAYCHEX, INC. 7869880-7 JULY TLO 8/7/2020 $379.05 Open 4017 8118 PAYCHEX, INC. 515733 PAYROLL #17 08142020 8/12/2020 $612.49 Open 4018 8118 PAYCHEX, INC. 515740 PAYROLL #17 - ADJ. RUN 8/14/2020 $15.72 Open PAYCHEX, INC. Total $1,007.26 4019 6870 PLANT CONCEPTS, INC. 2824 GIGP MAINTENANCE - JULY 2020 8/5/2020 $4,000.00 Open 4020 6870 PLANT CONCEPTS, INC. 2823 MOWING - CONTRACT A - PARKS - JULY 2020 8/5/2020 $11,463.00 Open PLANT CONCEPTS, INC. Total $15,463.00 4021 8614 PLEASANT VIEW GLASS, INC. 14595 GLASS REPLACEMENT 7/29/2020 $177.20 Open PLEASANT VIEW GLASS, INC. Total $177.20 4022 9719 PYRUS ENERGY, INC. dba PYRUS PETRO SERVICE 2070 FUEL ISLAND PARTS 8/5/2020 $642.90 Open PYRUS ENERGY, INC. dba PYRUS PETRO SERVICE Total $642.90 4023 9996 MANOJ RAJGARHIA 22860598 VARIOUS REC PROGRAMS - REFUND - COVID 19 8/17/2020 $240.00 Open MANOJ RAJGARHIA Total $240.00 4024 370 REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL CORP. 1165274 INTERNATIONAL PARTS 8/4/2020 $346.61 Open REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL CORP. Total $346.61 4025 9116 RELIABLE ONSITE SERVICES 184616732-001 PORTA-POTTY RENTAL 8/6/2020 $126.00 Open RELIABLE ONSITE SERVICES Total $126.00 4026 6250 JENNIFER RIES-TAGGART 2020-00000315 MILEAGE/PARKING REIMB. FOR JAN-JUN 2020 8/19/2020 $27.04 Open JENNIFER RIES-TAGGART Total $27.04 4027 6478 CINDI RITTENHOUSE 81120 YOGA INSTRUCTION - 5179.220 & 5078.220 8/11/2020 $675.00 Open CINDI RITTENHOUSE Total $675.00 4028 376 ROCHESTER ASPHALT MATERIALS 953697 ASPHALT FOR PAVING - CHELMSFORD ROAD 8/1/2020 $2,132.61 Open ROCHESTER ASPHALT MATERIALS Total $2,132.61 4029 377 ROCHESTER BUSINESS JOURNAL 10118197 RBJ RENEWAL 8/19/2020 $99.00 Open ROCHESTER BUSINESS JOURNAL Total $99.00 4030 378 ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP 11409019481 GAS & ELECTRIC FOR W. BRIGHTON FIRE FACILITIES 8/6/2020 $1,423.19 Open 4031 378 ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP 11209035688 GAS & ELECTRIC FOR W. BRIGHTON FIRE FACILITIES 8/24/2020 $13.05 Open ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP Total $1,436.24 4032 2118 ROCHESTER PAINT CENTER 132407 PAINTING SUPPLIES 8/14/2020 $871.80 Open ROCHESTER PAINT CENTER Total $871.80 4033 6834 DOMINICK SANNA 2020-00000316 MILEAGE REIMB. FOR JAN-JUN 2020 8/19/2020 $13.69 Open DOMINICK SANNA Total $13.69

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 6 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 4034 580 SKANEX PIPE SERVICES INC 5078 SANITARY SEWER LINING 8/5/2020 $47,633.00 Open SKANEX PIPE SERVICES INC Total $47,633.00 4035 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3450570283 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/4/2020 $25.47 Open 4036 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3451599716 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/18/2020 $72.48 Open 4037 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3452054332 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/25/2020 $11.62 Open 4038 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3452054333 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/25/2020 $36.56 Open 4039 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3452815159 STANDBY UPS SYSTEMS 8/1/2020 $81.30 Open 4040 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3452815164 HP 05A TONER 8/1/2020 $87.06 Open 4041 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3453478941 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8/8/2020 $34.81 Open 4042 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3453946119 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8/15/2020 $27.99 Open 4043 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3452815166 SUPPLIES 8/1/2020 $25.13 Open 4044 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3453478944 SUPPLIES 8/8/2020 $0.81 Open 4045 414 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3453478945 SUPPLIES 8/8/2020 $21.48 Open STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Total $424.71 4046 2548 STATE COMPTROLLER 2630920-20200501 MAY STATE & COUNTY FINES AND FEES 7/30/2020 $11,948.00 Open 4047 2548 STATE COMPTROLLER 2630920-20-06-01 JUNE STATE & COUNTY COURT FEES 8/11/2020 $27,530.25 Open STATE COMPTROLLER Total $39,478.25 4048 1761 SUTHERLAND SERVICE CENTER LTD 213475 TOWING 7/7/2020 $215.00 Open SUTHERLAND SERVICE CENTER LTD Total $215.00 4049 899 THE JEWISH LEDGER 957 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL FOR 8/1/20-8/1/21 7/13/2020 $40.00 Open THE JEWISH LEDGER Total $40.00 4050 440 THRU-WAY SPRING, INC. 141728 SPRING REPAIRS 7/23/2020 $824.44 Open 4051 440 THRU-WAY SPRING, INC. 142789 SPRING REPAIRS 8/12/2020 $126.82 Open THRU-WAY SPRING, INC. Total $951.26 4052 1533 TIFCO INDUSTRIES 71575112 PARTS, VARIOUS 7/28/2020 $169.95 Open TIFCO INDUSTRIES Total $169.95 4053 7612 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (USA) INC. 5308776 PRINT SERVICES FOR 7/15-8/14/20 7/13/2020 $170.04 Open 4054 7612 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (USA) INC. 5323813 COPY CHARGES 8/5/2020 $85.44 Open 4055 7612 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (USA) INC. 5323971 COPY CHARGES 8/5/2020 $60.44 Open TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (USA) INC. Total $315.92 4056 9648 TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, INCJULY DATA 8/1/2020 $150.00 Open TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, INC. Total $150.00 4057 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-243569 FUCHS 7/30/2020 $145.80 Open 4058 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-245299 FUCHS 8/10/2020 $14.95 Open 4059 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-245323 CLOUSTON 8/10/2020 $24.00 Open 4060 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-245325 CARABALLO 8/10/2020 $79.95 Open 4061 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-245670 FUCHS 8/14/2020 $79.95 Open 4062 459 UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC I021-246153 CATHOLDI 8/19/2020 $76.95 Open UNITED UNIFORMS CO INC Total $421.60 4063 678 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER 00022563-00 DOT DRUG/ALCOHOL SCREENING 8/19/2020 $130.00 Open 4064 678 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER 00022564-00 FUCHS 7/29/2020 $194.00 Open UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER Total $324.00 4065 3541 VERIZON WIRELESS 9859813938 FLOW METER MONITORING - JULY 2020 8/1/2020 $140.92 Open 4066 3541 VERIZON WIRELESS 9860481521 AUGUST 8/10/2020 $406.24 Open VERIZON WIRELESS Total $547.16

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 7 of 8 TOWN OF BRIGHTON CLAIMS ABSTRACT 8/26/2020 CLAIM NUMBER 3830 THROUGH 4086 VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE PAYMENT CLAIM # NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT INVOICE STATUS DATE 4067 7912 DEENA VIVIANI 2020-00000317 MILEAGE REIMB. FOR JAN-JUN 2020 7/20/2020 $40.77 Open 4068 7912 DEENA VIVIANI 2020-00000318 ALA/YALSA MEMBERSHIP 8/11/2020 $130.00 Open DEENA VIVIANI Total $170.77 4069 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 211466257 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 6/25/2020 $37.99 Open 4070 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 211508432 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 6/26/2020 $42.98 Open 4071 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 211689780 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/2/2020 $23.99 Open 4072 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 211763084 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/7/2020 $18.99 Open 4073 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212328771 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/27/2020 $18.69 Open 4074 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212445951 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/30/2020 $155.86 Open 4075 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212488206 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 7/31/2020 $42.98 Open 4076 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212612675 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $95.10 Open 4077 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212644538 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8/6/2020 $16.64 Open 4078 8439 W.B. MASON CO., INC. 212722930 SUPPLIES 8/10/2020 $96.40 Open W.B. MASON CO., INC. Total $549.62 4079 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9609526778 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2020 $47.12 Open 4080 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9609526786 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2020 $74.24 Open 4081 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9611075731 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $276.68 Open 4082 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9611527145 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $169.00 Open 4083 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9611814618 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8/5/2020 $329.00 Open 4084 473 W.W. GRAINGER INC 9613422964 MAINT. SUPPLIES 8/6/2020 $38.07 Open W.W. GRAINGER INC Total $934.11 4085 434 WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE 2020-00000319 WSJ SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 8/19/2020 $539.88 Open WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE Total $539.88 4086 65 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NY-ROCHEST 0013735-2225-7 DUMPSTER DELIVERY 8/3/2020 $50.00 Open WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NY-ROCHEST Total $50.00 Grand Total $678,201.06

Brightres08-26-2020CLAIMS (Details) Page 8 of 8 At a Town Board Meeting of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York, held on the 26th day of August, 2020 via Video Conference pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 as extended.

PRESENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE:

WILLIAM W. MOEHLE,

Supervisor

CHRISTOPHER K. WERNER JASON S. DIPONZIO ROBIN R. WILT CHRISTINE E. CORRADO,

Councilmembers

BE IT RESOLVED, that correspondence dated August 10, 2020 from

Commissioner of Public Works Michael E. Guyon, P.E. regarding a request to authorize the Supervisor to amend the Out of District Agreement for Sewer Use with the Town of Penfield to include 49 Collinsworth Drive be received and filed; and

BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes the Supervisor to execute an amendment to the Out of District Agreement for Sewer Use with the

Town of Penfield to include 49 Collinsworth Drive.

Dated: August 26, 2020

William W. Moehle, Supervisor Voting ____

Christopher K. Werner, Councilmember Voting ____

Jason S. DiPonzio, Councilmember Voting ____

Robin R. Wilt, Councilmember Voting ____

Christine E. Corrado, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-02

At a Town Board Meeting of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York, held on the 26th day of August, 2020 via Video Conference pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 as extended.

PRESENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE:

WILLIAM W. MOEHLE,

Supervisor

CHRISTOPHER K. WERNER JASON S. DIPONZIO ROBIN R. WILT CHRISTINE E. CORRADO,

Councilmembers

WHEREAS the Town Board is in receipt of two pieces of correspondence each dated August 12, 2020 from Town Planner Ramsey A. Boehner regarding a request to declare structures at respectively 405 Western Drive and 417 Western Drive in the Town of Brighton as dangerous and unsafe under the provisions of Chapter 51 of the Brighton Town Code and is also in receipt of two letter reports each dated August 7, 2020 from Town Building Inspector Edward Shero regarding a request pursuant to Chapter 51 of the Town Code that the Town Board declare the properties at 405 Western Drive and 417 Western Drive to be unsafe, order its demolition and removal and set a public hearing on the same for September 9, 2020, and

WHEREAS the Town Board has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the above referenced report, has considered the same and has determined in its opinion that the buildings and structures on said premises are dangerous and unsafe and should be demolished and removed, now it is hereby

RESOLVED that two pieces of correspondence each dated August 12, 2020 from Town Planner Ramsey A. Boehner regarding a request to declare buildings and structures at respectively 405 Western Drive and 417 Western Drive in the Town of Brighton as dangerous and unsafe under the provisions of Chapter 51 of the Brighton Town Code and is also in receipt of two letter reports each dated August 7, 2020 from

Brigtres08-26-2020-03 Town Building Inspector Edward Shero regarding a request pursuant to Chapter 51 of the Town Code that the Town Board declare the properties at 405 Western Drive and 417 Western Drive to be unsafe, order their demolition and removal and set a public hearing on the same for September 9, 2020, be received and filed, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby orders the demolition and removal of the buildings and structures located at 405 Western Drive and 417 Western Drive in the Town of Brighton, County of Monroe, State of New York (Tax Account #s 148.19-1-28 and 148.19-1-29) pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 51 of the Brighton Town Code, and be it further

RESOLVED, that a public hearing on the demolition and removal of said buildings and structures be held at the Brighton Town Hall, 2300 Elmwood Avenue, Town of Brighton, County of Monroe, State of New York at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on the 9th day of September 2020; and be it further

RESOLVED, that notice of the order of the Town Board and of the public hearing on the demolition and removal of said buildings and structures shall be served, filed and posted in the manner and on the persons and places as set forth in Chapter 51 of the Town Code; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the town shall be reimbursed for all costs of work performed or services rendered by assessment and levy on the real property on which such violations occurred, including but not limited to the cost of actually removing said buildings and structures. The expense so assessed shall constitute a lien and charge on the real property on which it is levied until paid or otherwise satisfied or discharged and shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other town charges.

Dated: August 26, 2020

William W. Moehle, Supervisor Voting ____

Christopher K. Werner, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-03 Jason S. DiPonzio, Councilmember Voting ____

Robin R. Wilt, Councilmember Voting ____

Christine E. Corrado, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-03

At a Town Board Meeting of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York, held on the 26th day of August, 2020 via Video Conference pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 as extended.

PRESENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE:

WILLIAM W. MOEHLE,

Supervisor

CHRISTOPHER K. WERNER JASON S. DIPONZIO ROBIN R. WILT CHRISTINE E. CORRADO,

Councilmembers

BE IT RESOLVED, that correspondence dated August 20, 2020 from

Commissioner of Public Works Michael E. Guyon, P.E. regarding a request to authorize the Supervisor to approve a change order in an amount not to exceed

$5,000.00 for a total contract amount not to exceed $174,200 with Roman

Construction Development Corp. for the 2020 sidewalk replacement program be received and filed; and

BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes the Supervisor to approve a change order in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 for a total contract amount not to exceed $174,200 with Roman Construction Development

Corp. for the 2020 sidewalk replacement program.

Dated: August 26, 2020

William W. Moehle, Supervisor Voting ____

Christopher K. Werner, Councilmember Voting ____

Jason S. DiPonzio, Councilmember Voting ____

Robin R. Wilt, Councilmember Voting ____

Christine E. Corrado, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-04

At a Town Board Meeting of the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York, held on the 26th day of August, 2020 via Video Conference pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 as extended.

PRESENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE:

WILLIAM W. MOEHLE,

Supervisor

CHRISTOPHER K. WERNER JASON S. DIPONZIO ROBIN R. WILT CHRISTINE E. CORRADO,

Councilmembers

BE IT RESOLVED, that a memorandum dated August 26, 2020 from Town

Supervisor William W. Moehle regarding a request to authorize the renewal of an intermunicipal agreement with the County of Monroe to continue to participate in the Energy Aggregation Group for the purchase of natural gas and electricity, be received and filed; and

BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes the

Supervisor to execute a renewal of the intermunicipal agreement with the County of Monroe effective September 1, 2020 to continue to participate in the Energy Aggregation Group for the purchase of natural gas and electricity subject to the review and approval of the form of the renewal of said contract by the Attorney to the Town.

Dated: August 26, 2020

William W. Moehle, Supervisor Voting ____

Christopher K. Werner, Councilmember Voting ____

Jason S. DiPonzio, Councilmember Voting ____

Robin R. Wilt, Councilmember Voting ____

Christine E. Corrado, Councilmember Voting ____

Brigtres08-26-2020-05

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Honorable Town Board FROM: William W. Moehle, Town Supervisor DATE: August 26, 2020 RE: Agreement Renewal- Monroe County Consortium for Natural Gas and Electricity Purchases

The Town of Brighton has been a member of a consortium of Monroe County communities for natural gas and electricity purchases. Like other shared services programs, this consortium has offered us the opportunity to purchase these utilities for Town operations in bulk at wholesale rates. The current contract expires on August 31, 2020, and to continue with these supply arrangements starting January 1, 2021, we must renew that agreement with the County.

At the same time, we are actively exploring alternatives, either through the County or through Joule Assets, to source wholesale renewable source electricity. While it is important that we renew our existing contract with Monroe County at this time, if we are able to arrange an alternate supply arrangement for renewable energy, I will ask this Board to consider adopting such a plan, whether it is with Monroe County or with an alternative provider.

*LIVE* Town of Brighton *LIVE* Expense Budget by Organization Report Through 07/31/20 Prior Fiscal Year Activity Included Summary Listing

Adopted Budget Amended Current Month YTD YTD Budget - YTD % Used/ Organization Budget Amendments Budget Transactions Encumbrances Transactions Transactions Rec'd Prior Year YTD Fund A - General Fund Fund A - General Fund Totals $18,003,645.00 $506,013.31 $18,509,658.31 $1,451,601.95 $922,531.97 $9,033,917.54 $8,553,208.80 $9,177,566.46 Fund D - Highway Fund Fund D - Highway Fund Totals $5,590,855.00 $105,128.70 $5,695,983.70 $761,500.79 $719,844.88 $3,146,943.47 $1,829,195.35 $2,991,756.95 Fund H - Capital Projects Fund Fund H - Capital Projects Fund Totals $0.00 $2,432,694.32 $2,432,694.32 $446,179.59 $1,515,191.80 $693,805.32 $223,697.20 $1,035,332.51 Fund L - Library Fund Fund L - Library Fund Totals $2,157,220.00 $4,922.01 $2,162,142.01 $196,076.14 $124,325.12 $1,054,281.53 $983,535.36 $1,078,546.87 Fund SA - Ambulance Special Dist Fund SA - Ambulance Special Dist Totals $391,700.00 $0.00 $391,700.00 $1,164.18 $0.00 $292,530.97 $99,169.03 $406,398.07 Fund SB - Business Improvement Dist Fund SB - Business Improvement Dist Totals $1,630.00 $0.00 $1,630.00 $200.00 $750.00 $500.00 $380.00 $380.00 Fund SD - Drainage District Funds Fund SD - Drainage District Funds Totals $6,525.00 $0.00 $6,525.00 $256.00 $960.00 $1,024.84 $4,540.16 $1,154.59 Fund SF - Fire Prevention Districts Fund SF - Fire Prevention Districts Totals $1,556,650.00 $0.00 $1,556,650.00 $28,862.09 $353,592.68 $1,074,129.96 $128,927.36 $1,119,438.15 Fund SK - Sidewalk District Fund SK - Sidewalk District Totals $177,720.00 $10,677.59 $188,397.59 $0.00 $160,284.79 $3,892.80 $24,220.00 $158,678.60 Fund SL - Street Lighting Districts Fund SL - Street Lighting Districts Totals $360,350.00 $0.00 $360,350.00 $24,087.79 $0.00 $148,661.41 $211,688.59 $191,347.16 Fund SM - Sidewalk Snow Removal Dst Fund SM - Sidewalk Snow Removal Dst Totals $63,420.00 $0.00 $63,420.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,533.60 $45,886.40 $38,828.71 Fund SN - Neighborhood Improve Dist Fund SN - Neighborhood Improve Dist Totals $5,435.00 $0.00 $5,435.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,435.00 $210.00 Fund SP - Park Special District Fund SP - Park Special District Totals $5,165.00 $0.00 $5,165.00 $380.00 $1,940.00 $1,985.00 $1,240.00 $620.00 Fund SR - Refuse Removal Districts Fund SR - Refuse Removal Districts Totals $1,062,170.00 $0.00 $1,062,170.00 $172,051.20 $432,216.00 $602,179.20 $27,774.80 $526,444.08 Fund SS - Consolidated Sewer Dist Fund SS - Consolidated Sewer Dist Totals $1,897,465.00 $5,490.60 $1,902,955.60 $150,302.28 $434,074.59 $736,142.61 $732,738.40 $1,186,958.70 Fund SW - Consolidated Water Dist Fund SW - Consolidated Water Dist Totals $31,710.00 $0.00 $31,710.00 $6,250.65 $0.00 $6,250.65 $25,459.35 $25,410.00 Fund V - Debt Service Fund Fund V - Debt Service Fund Totals $36,890.00 $0.00 $36,890.00 $36,891.33 $0.00 $36,891.33 ($1.33) $34,079.11

Grand Totals $31,348,550.00 $3,064,926.53 $34,413,476.53 $3,275,803.99 $4,665,711.83 $16,850,670.23 $12,897,094.47 $17,973,149.96

Run by Paula Parker on 08/21/2020 02:57:26 PM Page 1 of 1 *LIVE* Town of Brighton *LIVE* Revenue Budget by Organization Report Through 07/31/20 Prior Fiscal Year Activity Included Summary Listing

Adopted Budget Amended Current Month YTD YTD Budget - YTD % Used/ Organization Budget Amendments Budget Transactions Encumbrances Transactions Transactions Rec'd Prior Year YTD Fund A - General Fund Fund A - General Fund Totals $17,365,970.00 $190,294.00 $17,556,264.00 $87,562.47 $0.00 $12,200,027.59 $5,356,236.41 $12,645,334.85 Fund D - Highway Fund Fund D - Highway Fund Totals $5,237,720.00 $0.00 $5,237,720.00 $19,150.62 $0.00 $4,787,561.79 $450,158.21 $4,888,438.21 Fund H - Capital Projects Fund Fund H - Capital Projects Fund Totals $0.00 $1,511,038.95 $1,511,038.95 $0.00 $0.00 $1,193,833.36 $317,205.59 $1,342,154.76 Fund L - Library Fund Fund L - Library Fund Totals $2,124,010.00 $765.00 $2,124,775.00 $962.34 $0.00 $2,033,948.97 $90,826.03 $2,075,687.75 Fund SA - Ambulance Special Dist Fund SA - Ambulance Special Dist Totals $379,700.00 $0.00 $379,700.00 $3,978.91 $0.00 $383,036.21 ($3,336.21) $390,493.81 Fund SB - Business Improvement Dist Fund SB - Business Improvement Dist Totals $1,530.00 $0.00 $1,530.00 $0.54 $0.00 $1,539.39 ($9.39) $1,689.23 Fund SD - Drainage District Funds Fund SD - Drainage District Funds Totals $6,525.00 $0.00 $6,525.00 $323.90 $0.00 $6,591.69 ($66.69) $6,440.54 Fund SF - Fire Prevention Districts Fund SF - Fire Prevention Districts Totals $1,477,150.00 $0.00 $1,477,150.00 $46.00 $0.00 $1,488,491.96 ($11,341.96) $1,346,734.44 Fund SK - Sidewalk District Fund SK - Sidewalk District Totals $167,720.00 $0.00 $167,720.00 $31.24 $0.00 $168,175.26 ($455.26) $166,286.40 Fund SL - Street Lighting Districts Fund SL - Street Lighting Districts Totals $357,350.00 $0.00 $357,350.00 $49.60 $0.00 $358,217.91 ($867.91) $338,214.70 Fund SM - Sidewalk Snow Removal Dst Fund SM - Sidewalk Snow Removal Dst Totals $63,120.00 $0.00 $63,120.00 $7.83 $0.00 $63,249.23 ($129.23) $58,556.60 Fund SN - Neighborhood Improve Dist Fund SN - Neighborhood Improve Dist Totals $4,235.00 $0.00 $4,235.00 $1.86 $0.00 $4,265.50 ($30.50) $4,311.66 Fund SP - Park Special District Fund SP - Park Special District Totals $4,165.00 $0.00 $4,165.00 $1.28 $0.00 $4,188.75 ($23.75) $4,507.89 Fund SR - Refuse Removal Districts Fund SR - Refuse Removal Districts Totals $1,062,170.00 $0.00 $1,062,170.00 $85.04 $0.00 $1,063,727.52 ($1,557.52) $896,620.02 Fund SS - Consolidated Sewer Dist Fund SS - Consolidated Sewer Dist Totals $1,878,425.00 $0.00 $1,878,425.00 $10,234.92 $0.00 $1,858,473.76 $19,951.24 $1,974,617.40 Fund SW - Consolidated Water Dist Fund SW - Consolidated Water Dist Totals $31,710.00 $0.00 $31,710.00 $1,321.91 $0.00 $26,340.37 $5,369.63 $24,566.16 Fund V - Debt Service Fund Fund V - Debt Service Fund Totals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $188,610.55 $0.00 $189,126.78 ($189,126.78) $2,132.28

Grand Totals $30,161,500.00 $1,702,097.95 $31,863,597.95 $312,369.01 $0.00 $25,830,796.04 $6,032,801.91 $26,166,786.70

Run by Paula Parker on 08/21/2020 02:58:45 PM Page 1 of 1