DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Comments Received Following the Public Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Comments Received Following the Public Hearing Comments Received Following the Public Hearing January 10, 2018 – January 12, 2017 by 12PM Commenters supplying comments within this packet include: 1. Janet Jordan 44. Peter Reid 2. Alex Kistler 45. Peter Reid 3. Andrea Sehmel 46. Sue Hedrick 4. Anne Buck 47. Allen Miller 5. Barbara Smith 48. Barbara Ogle 6. Becky Thomas 49. Bob Van Schoorl 7. Brian Jensen 50. Bruce Botka 8. Carol and Jamie Rainwood 51. Carol Richmond 9. Cynthia Zujko 52. Chris Reitz 10. Davenport Moore 53. Dave Cundiff 11. Edward West 54. Deschutes Estuary Restoration Tean 12. Gretchen Williams 55. Dick Binns 13. Jim Kainber 56. Dorthy Gist 14. Jim Randall 57. Erica A. Cooper 15. Laura and Warren Westrup 58. Fred Macinnes 16. Lawrence Jacobson 59. Frederick Adair 17. Michelle Harriage 60. Gary Wiles 18. Oly Babs 61. Gay Gordon 19. Paul Knox 62. Gretchen Christopher 20. Rich Bakala 63. Stephen Pruka 21. Rick Panowicz 64. James Legenfelder & Emily Ray 22. Robert Ahlschwede 65. Janet Murr 23. Robert Sands 66. Janice Arnold 24. Stephen Segall 67. Jeff Wagnitz 25. Sue Lean 68. Jim Montecucco 26. Troy Bussey 69. John Bay 27. Allen Hettinger 70. John Montecucco 28. Bev Skinner 71. Kathleen Callison 29. Andrea Sehmel 72. Kelly Thompson 30. Anne Buck 73. Lee Montecucco 31. Edward West 74. Linda Gallagher 32. Maureen 75. Lorree Gardener 33. Paul Knox 76. Maggie Reardon 34. Bev Skinner 77. Margaret Clifford 35. Carol Horner 78. Mary Miller 36. Donn Lawrence 79. Michael G. Jackson 37. Ed Zabel 80. Paul Williams 38. Farrell Arnold 81. Rachel Newmann 39. Kim and Ken Adney 82. Ralph Munro 40. Linda Lentz 83. Robin Vaupel 41. Martin Redston 84. Roger Grieb 42. Mikki Lawrence 85. Ruth Shearer 43. Nicole Floyd & Jerry Reilly Correspondence 86. Sandy Montecucco 1 87. Stanley Crossman 88. Steve Whalen 89. Tom Culhane 90. Wanda Hedrick 2 Nicole Floyd From: Janet Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 6:07 PM To: Nicole Floyd; CityCouncil Subject: Comments opposing "Views on 5th" Olympia City Council and City Administration, I am Janet Jordan, 6702 Garrett Court NE, Olympia 98506. These are my views on the project being considered for the isthmus. Others have written about the dangers of creating another tall building on the isthmus – the loss of important views from the Capital down to the water, and from the arteries between East to West Olympia up to the Capital; the fact that sea levels will rise (every new scientific report gives us a new reason to believe the rise will be higher that previously thought); and the dangers of building with a foundation of unstable fill material. These are important reasons and should be enough to remove the Views on Fifth project from consideration. I would add that the majority of Olympia residents have shown their disapproval of the project, in the City Council votes of 2011: after a vigorous controversy about the removal of the existing 9-story building, all councilmembers favoring development on the isthmus were voted out. We, the citizens, expect that our preferences should be decisive in policy matters. For us, development on the isthmus impacts quality of life. It is important, and we have told City Council. We don’t want an anomalous building there, suddenly rising nine stories high out of a background of two-story buildings, no matter what its architectural features. The fact that it is there at all is an offense. Please pay attention to citizen wishes. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Janet Jordan 1 From: Alex Kistler <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:33 PM To: Nicole Floyd Subject: The Views Hi, I am a resident of Olympia and want to express my concerns about the potential development of the tower near Capitol Lake. I feel that downtown needs more housing and business development. However, I feel that it should be done in a place that does not impact our precious space and views at the north end of the lake. There are many other places for development that could have views and benefit our city without impacting the pleasure of so many people who would like to look up Budd Bay and see the Olympics. The current building is in a very unfortunate place and I am in favor of having it removed. The decision we make now will likely impact this area for the rest of our lifetimes and I think it degrades the potential to have a fantastic park in the center of our city. It is amenities like this that make a city attractive. In the case of this building it benefits the few at the expense of the many. I encourage you to deny this development and return this area to the people for use as a public space. I think it would have a positive impact on the property values and vitality of our downtown. Thanks for your consideration, Alex Kistler 360.754.1105 Kenneth Haner From: Andrea Sehmel <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:56 PM To: Nicole Floyd Subject: Views on 5th Dear Ms. Floyd & Team – Thank you very much for the opportunity to hear comments regarding the exciting prospect of the Views on 5th development. Like others, I want to thank you for your analysis of a complex situation. I listened carefully to all the comments and agree that in a perfect world, the isthmus could have been left alone ‐ to be just a busy, gray, cold roadway. However, it’s been developed for 50+ years and, judging from the mock‐ups, the proposed development actually blends into the view from the Law Enforcement Officer plaza quite seamlessly, and certainly more attractively than the current building. Further, the idea of bringing 200+ new jobs to the City is a breath of fresh air. My main point in writing is that I wanted to suggest that perhaps a couple of ground floor office areas could be devoted to an Olympia region museum. This would entice even more people into the downtown core and honor the city’s history. Perhaps if the project was seen as more serving of the community, it would be more readily accepted by the nay‐sayers. Such an opportunity would only draw more people to the complex. I applaud the Brogans and their development team, in particular Mr. Thomas, who compellingly presented a vision of hope and change for Olympia’s downtown last night. After living here since 2000, and with two teenage boys who need a reason to stay in what has felt like a dying city, it is sorely needed. Very truly yours, Mrs. Andrea Sehmel, R.N., M.N. 1 Kenneth Haner From: Anne Buck <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 1:51 PM To: Nicole Floyd Subject: mistake on the lake Please remove the building on Fifth that many call the Mistake On The Lake and all of the small empty buildings as well.that surround it. It was built just before we moved to Olmpia by just a few men that ran the town and I remember at that time they were telling us that Mr. Lynch their lawyer finagled the law in order to build The Lemon family (whose house we purchased) was one of the instigators. Please, lets respect the original plans for that property. Anne Buck 1 Kenneth Haner From: Oly Babs <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 7:29 PM To: Nicole Floyd Subject: Please say no to another Mistake by the Lake Dear Ms. Floyd, I am a resident of Olympia, and I want to express my concern about the development known as "Views on Fifth." The last thing we need in Olympia is more over-priced housing. We are dying for affordable housing, and instead, we plan to build "market rate" housing, in a vain attempt to lure the wealthy. Trust me - the wealthy don't want to live in downtown Olympia. I'd like to see the stats for the supposedly "market rate" apartments that have already gone up downtown. Are they fully occupied? And who is this market that can afford these apartments? I work for the State of Washington. I make a comfortable wage. But I can't afford $3,000 a month. Heck, I barely take home that much a month! But here you're planning to put in more high-end housing? When we are inundated with people like me who make $45,000 a year or less who can barely afford to live in Olympia? I managed to secure the apartment I live in ONLY because I got lucky and saw it for rent 4 hours after it was posted online and was the first person there with a check. Many people are not so lucky. And with the lack of housing, landlords (including mine) are being overt about not renting to people who smoke, not allowing pets, demanding exorbitant up front fees, pet rents, etc. I know one retired couple, who weren't employed, so the landlord thought they were shifty because they didn't have an employer or monthly income, who were required to pay a year's rent in advance, to secure a house last year. I'm not talking about housing for homeless street people. I'm talking about the huge number of state workers in this town who make less than $60,000 a year, who are doubling up with family members because they can't find a place of their own that they can afford. Used to be getting a State job meant some kind of financial security.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 323 US Climate Mayors Commit to Adopt, Honor and Uphold Paris
    6/22/2017 323 #ClimateMayors adopt, honor and uphold #ParisAgreement goals Climate Mayors Follow U.S. #ClimateMayors working together to advance local climate action, national emission reduction policies,… Jun 1 · 12 min read 323 US Climate Mayors commit to adopt, honor and uphold Paris Climate Agreement goals STATEMENT FROM THE CLIMATE MAYORS IN RESPONSE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT Thursday, June 1st 2017 The President’s denial of global warming is getting a cold reception from America’s cities. As 323 US Mayors representing 62 million Americans, we will adopt, honor, and uphold the commitments to the goals enshrined in the Paris Agreement. We will intensify efforts to meet each of our cities’ current climate goals, push for new action to meet the 1.5 degrees Celsius target, and work together to create a 21st century clean energy economy. We will continue to lead. We are increasing investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency. We will buy and create more demand for electric cars and trucks. We will increase our efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions, create a clean energy economy, and stand for environmental justice. And if the President wants to break the promises made to our allies enshrined in the historic Paris Agreement, we’ll build and strengthen relationships around the world to protect the planet from devastating climate risks. The world cannot wait — and neither will we. Item 5b Attachment 2 https://medium.com/@ClimateMayors/climate­mayors­commit­to­adopt­honor­and­uphold­paris­climate­agreement­goals­ba566e260097
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Prelim CFP.Indb
    2016-2021 Preliminary Capital Facilities Plan City of Olympia | Capital of Washington State 2016-2021 Preliminary Capital Facilities Plan Prepared by the City of Olympia, Administrative Services Department P.O. Box 1967, Olympia, Washington 98507-1967 City of Olympia, Washington 2016-2021 Preliminary Capital Facilities Plan InformaƟ on and Resources Contact Information City of Olympia, PO Box 1967, Olympia WA 98507 Phone: 360.753.8325 / Fax: 360.753.8165 olympiawa.gov City Council Stephen H. Buxbaum, Mayor Jim Cooper Nathaniel Jones, Mayor Pro Tem Julie Hankins Cheryl Selby Steve Langer Jeannine Roe Administration Steven R. Hall, City Manager Jay Burney, Assistant City Manager Jane Ragland Kirkemo, Administrative Services Director Keith Stahley, Community Planning & Development Director Paul Simmons, Parks, Arts & Recreation Director Rich Hoey, Public Works Director Planning Commission Carole Richmond, Chair Jessica Bateman Jerome Parker Max Brown Judy Bardin Missy Watts Darrell Hoppe Kim Andresen Roger Horn Transportation Mobility Strategy: olympiawa.gov/transportation Olympia Comprehensive Plan: imagineolympia.com Olympia Bicycle Master Plan: olympiawa.gov/transportation Water System Plan: olympiawa.gov/drinkingwater LOTT Clean Water Alliance: lottcleanwater.org Capital Facilities Technical Team The City Council wishes to acknowledge the many individuals who contributed to the preparation of this document. In addition to the required review by the Planning Commission, the following advisory groups also provide technical review of the CFP: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, and the Utility Advisory Committee. The Capital Facilities Plan is an implementing strategy of the Capital Facilities Element of Olympia’s Comprehensive Plan developed in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Facilities Plan Adopted
    Adopted Capital Facilities Plan City of Olympia, Washington 2019-2024 Financial Plan City of Olympia’s Comprehensive Plan– Volume II Adopted Capital Facilities Plan 2019-2024 Financial Plan City of Olympia’s Comprehensive Plan-Volume II Prepared by the City of Olympia Administrative Services Department P.O. Box 1967, Olympia, Washington 98507-1967 City of Olympia, Washington Capital Facilities Plan, 2019-2024 Financial Plan Information and Resources Contact Information Administration City of Olympia Steven R. Hall, City Manager PO Box 1967 Jay Burney, Assistant City Manager Olympia, WA 98507 Debbie Sullivan, Administrative Services Director 360.753.8325 phone Keith Stahley, Community Planning & Development Director 360.753.8165 fax Paul Simmons, Parks, Arts & Recreation Director olympiawa.gov Rich Hoey, Public Works Director City Council Planning Commission Cheryl Selby, Mayor Jim Cooper Rad Cunningham, Chair Travis Burns Nathaniel Jones, Mayor Pro Tem Lisa Parshley Carole Richmond Paula Ehlers Clark Gilman Renata Rollins Tammy Adams Candi Millar Jessica Bateman Kento Azegami Joel Baxter Jessica Blose Information Resources LOTT Clean Water Alliance: lottcleanwater.org Transportation Mobility Strategy: olympiawa.gov/transportation Olympia Comprehensive Plan: olympiawa.gov/compplan Water System Plan: olympiawa.gov/drinkingwater Olympia Bicycle Master Plan: olympiawa.gov/transportation Capital Facilities Technical Team The City Council wishes to acknowledge the many individuals who contributed to the preparation of this document. In addition to the required review by the Planning Commission, the following advisory groups also provide technical review of the CFP: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, and the Utility Advisory Committee. The Capital Facilities Plan is Volume II of the Olympia Comprehensive Plan developed in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Leaders' Clean Cars Declaration
    LOCAL LEADERS’ CLEAN CARS DECLARATION As U.S. attorneys general, mayors and county executives, we – not federal officials in Washington, D.C. – are primarily responsible for the transportation systems upon which our residents and our local and regional economies depend. A clean, efficient and high-performance vehicle fleet is an essential component of these systems. We strongly support the current federal standards for such a modern vehicle fleet agreed to in 2012 by the automotive industry, the federal government and the State of California. We believe these standards are both necessary and feasible – a conclusion reaffirmed in a major 2016study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California Air Resources Board. This study found that auto companies are adopting fuel economy technologies at unprecedented rates and will be able to meet these standards primarily with conventional vehicles. The study also found that the cost of compliance will be similar or lower than anticipated in 2012, with substantial fuel savings payback for consumers. These findings are consistent with a major 2015 study by the National Academy of Sciences. All Americans -- not only the residents of the states, cities and counties signing this manifesto – deserve to enjoy fuel-efficient, low-emission cars and light trucks that save money on gas, improve our health and support American jobs. We strongly urge the auto industry to join us, and to use its influence with the Administration to ensure that these standards remain in place. Given our responsibilities to our citizens, we also strongly oppose and will vigorously resist any effort by the Administration to prevent states from enforcing reasonable, commonsense emissions performance standards for vehicle fleets sold in their jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Leaders' Clean Cars Declaration
    LOCAL LEADERS’ CLEAN CARS DECLARATION As U.S. attorneys general, mayors and county executives, we – not federal officials in Washington, D.C. – are primarily responsible for the transportation systems upon which our residents and our local and regional economies depend. A clean, efficient and high-performance vehicle fleet is an essential component of these systems. We strongly support the current federal standards for such a modern vehicle fleet agreed to in 2012 by the automotive industry, the federal government and the State of California. We believe these standards are both necessary and feasible – a conclusion reaffirmed in a major 2016 study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California Air Resources Board. This study found that auto companies are adopting fuel economy technologies at unprecedented rates and will be able to meet these standards primarily with conventional vehicles. The study also found that the cost of compliance will be similar or lower than anticipated in 2012, with substantial fuel savings payback for consumers. These findings are consistent with a major 2015 study by the National Academy of Sciences. All Americans -- not only the residents of the states, cities and counties signing this manifesto -- deserve to enjoy fuel-efficient, low-emission cars and light trucks that save money on gas, improve our health and support American jobs. We strongly urge the auto industry to join us, and to use its influence with the Administration to ensure that these standards remain in place. Given our responsibilities to our citizens, we also strongly oppose and will vigorously resist any effort by the Administration to prevent states from enforcing reasonable, commonsense emissions performance standards for vehicle fleets sold in their jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • AJC Seattle Times Ad 051621
    PAID ADVERTISEMENT PAID ADVERTISEMENT MAYORS UNITE TO FIGHT ANTISEMITISM 36 mayors across the Pacific Northwest recently pledged to oppose antisemitism through the Mayors United Against Antisemitism initiative, led by American Jewish Committee (AJC) and The United States Conference of Mayors. They signed a statement declaring that antisemitism is incompatible with fundamental democratic values. Faith-based hate crimes are on the rise, with the largest increase of incidents directed at Jews. “As Mayors and municipal leaders, we have a unique responsibility to speak out against the growing menace of antisemitism,” states the Mayors United Against Antisemitism statement. AJC Seattle is deeply grateful for the leadership of these elected officials in speaking out against antisemitism and for opposing all forms of hate and discrimination. Together, we are committed to continuing our work together to foster a safer and more just society for all. The mayors in our region who have joined the initiative to combat antisemitism are listed below. Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson, Anchorage, AK Mayor Nancy Backus, Auburn, WA Mayor Angela Birney, Redmond, WA Mayor Brian Blad, Pocatello, ID Mayor Jenny Durkan, Seattle, WA Mayor Ronald Jacobson, Post Falls, ID Mayor Allan Ekberg, Tukwila, WA Mayor Lauren McLean, Boise, ID Mayor Cassie Franklin, Everett, WA Mayor Robert Simison, Meridian, ID Mayor Glenn Johnson, Pullman, WA Mayor Steve Widmyer, Coeur d’Alene, ID Mayor Jimmy Matta, Burien, WA Mayor Mike Nelson, Edmonds, WA Mayor Bill Cole, Billings, MT Mayor
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA May 15, 3:30 PM
    THURSTON COUNTY MEDIC ONE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTER/EOC AGENDA May 15, 3:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IV. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. EMS Council - March 20, 2019 & April 17, 2019 B. Ops Committee - May 2, 2019 (Informational only) V. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Operations Committee – Ops Chair or Representative B. West Region EMS Council – WREMS Representative C. Staff Report D. Comprehensive Plan VI. OLD BUSINESS ITEM PRESENTER EXPECTED OUTCOME A. Medic One Public Survey Hardin Presentation B. PSPH Certificate of Need Update Hardin Information C. VII. NEW BUSINESS ITEM PRESENTER EXPECTED OUTCOME A. Special Project Applications VanCamp Approve/Disapprove B. EMS Council Representative to WREMS McPhee Discussion Recommend C. MPD Contract Amendment Hardin Approval/Disapproval D. 2019 1st Qtr Budget Review Miller Presentation VIII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER X. ADJOURNMENT Persons with hearing or speaking impairments can call Washington Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-833-6388 K:\Adminstration\Committees\EMS Council\EMSC Meetings\2019\Agendas\5 EMSC May 15, 2019 Agenda.doc Thurston County Medic One 4A Emergency Medical Services Council – Regular Meeting Medic One Office April 17, 2019 PRESENT: Margaret McPhee, Brian VanCamp, Cindy Hambly, Liberty Ryder, John Ricks, Tom Oliva, Stan Moon, Harry Miller, Cody Colt, Cheryl Selby, Lenny Greenstein ABSENT: Larry Fontanilla EXCUSED: Gary Edwards, Paul Perz, Shelia Fay GUESTS: Steve Brooks, Warren Peterson, Steven Slater, Chris Clem, Nathan Weed (DOH) STAFF: Kurt Hardin, Sandra Bush, Joy Miller, Ben Miller-Todd CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL – Chair McPhee called the r e gular meeting of the Emergency Medical Services Council (EMSC) to order at 3:30 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayors for Solar Energy
    For more information, visit: https://environmentamerica.org/feature/ame/mayors-solar-energy Mayors for Solar Energy We, the undersigned U.S. Mayors and local officials, resolve to make solar energy a key element of our communities' energy plans. Accelerating the growth of solar will reduce pollution while revitalizing our communities by creating jobs and keeping energy dollars in our local economies. Expanding solar power helps residents and businesses benefit from lower energy costs while providing more local control of energy and improving our communities' resilience. Therefore, solar energy can and should be a much larger part of our energy mix than it is today. The U.S. has the potential to produce 100 times more solar power than the total amount of energy we consume each year. We must continue to harness this vast source of clean energy for the benefit of all of our citizens. As local leaders, we know that our communities are particularly well-suited to adopt solar power. Cities and towns are natural centers of electricity demand, have the rooftops and infrastructure needed for installing solar panels, and can craft policies to help residents and utilities make the switch to solar power. With a concerted effort underway on the state and federal levels to limit the growth of solar by fossil fuel special interests, communities like ours across the country need to act quickly to continue our progress toward renewable energy. By signing this statement in support of solar, we commit to supporting efforts to advance solar energy in our local communities, states, and the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Here, Helping to Ensure That Members of Our Communities Are Able to Live and Work Together Despite Differences in How They Look, What They Believe, Or Whom They Love
    No. 16-111 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., et al., Petitioners, v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The Colorado Court Of Appeals --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CITIES OF NEW YORK AND LOS ANGELES, 67 ADDITIONAL CITIES AND COUNTIES, 80 MAYORS, AND UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ZACHARY W. C ARTER JAMES R. WILLIAMS Corporation Counsel County Counsel RICHARD DEARING GRETA S. HANSEN CLAUDE S. PLATTON LAURA S. TRICE BENJAMIN WELIKSON JULIE WILENSKY NEW YORK CITY Counsel of Record LAW DEPARTMENT JULIA B. SPIEGEL 100 Church Street LYNNETTE K. MINER New York, NY 10007 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL, MICHAEL N. FEUER COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA City Attorney 70 West Hedding Street JAMES P. C LARK East Wing, 9th Floor THOMAS P. P ETERS San José, CA 95110 BLITHE SMITH BOCK (408) 299-5902 SHAUN DABBY JACOBS [email protected] OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY 200 N. Main Street, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IDENTITY AND INTEREST
    [Show full text]
  • Sent a Letter
    WWW.CLIMATE-MAYORS.ORG • [email protected] February 20, 2018 By electronic mail ([email protected]) and first class mail Administrator Scott Pruitt Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) Mail Code 28221T Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0355 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Administrator Pruitt: As mayors from 233 U.S. cities, we submit this letter of comment to oppose the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan, Repeal of Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units.1 Collectively, we represent over 51 million residents, in 46 states & territories across the country. We strongly oppose the proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan, which would put our citizens at risk and harm our efforts to address the urgent threat of climate change. Climate Change is Global but Impacts are Felt Locally Communities across the country are experiencing the effects of climate change today: sea level rise; hotter, longer, and more frequent heat waves; increased extreme weather; and many other harmful impacts. There is broad agreement that the future economic costs of climate change should not be overlooked. On our current path, the annual cost of coastal storm damage is expected to climb to as high as $35 billion by the 2030s; coastal property valued at $66 to $106 billion will likely be underwater by 2050.2 No one is insulated from the impacts of climate change – people in cities of all sizes, along with suburban and rural communities are all at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayors for Solar Energy
    For more information, visit: https://environmentamerica.org/feature/ame/go-solar Mayors for Solar Energy We, the undersigned U.S. Mayors and local officials, resolve to make solar energy a key element of our communities' energy plans. Accelerating the growth of solar will reduce pollution while revitalizing our communities by creating jobs and keeping energy dollars in our local economies. Expanding solar power helps residents and businesses benefit from lower energy costs while providing more local control of energy and improving our communities' resilience. Therefore, solar energy can and should be a much larger part of our energy mix than it is today. The U.S. has the potential to produce 100 times more solar power than the total amount of energy we consume each year. We must continue to harness this vast source of clean energy for the benefit of all of our citizens. As local leaders, we know that our communities are particularly well-suited to adopt solar power. Cities and towns are natural centers of electricity demand, have the rooftops and infrastructure needed for installing solar panels, and can craft policies to help residents and utilities make the switch to solar power. With a concerted effort underway on the state and federal levels to limit the growth of solar by fossil fuel special interests, communities like ours across the country need to act quickly to continue our progress toward renewable energy. By signing this statement in support of solar, we commit to supporting efforts to advance solar energy in our local communities, states, and the nation. Signed: Arizona Jonathan Rothschild, Mayor, Tucson Arkansas Lioneld Jordan, Mayor, Fayetteville Jay Hollowell, Mayor, City of Helena-West Helena California Jesse Arreguin, Mayor, Berkeley Glenn Sylvester, Former Mayor, Daly City Catherine Blakespear, Mayor, Encinitas Lily Mei, Mayor, Fremont Skylar Peak, Former Mayor, Malibu Clyde Roberson, Mayor, Monterey John F.
    [Show full text]
  • June 17, 2019 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Nancy
    June 17, 2019 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives Dear Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Minority Leader McCarthy: We write as current and former governors, mayors, state senators, state representatives, and local elected officials in all 50 states to share how America’s International Affairs Budget provides a significant return on investment for our communities. While we must continue to invest here at home, American leadership around the world and investments in development and diplomacy help build a more prosperous and peaceful world that benefits the American people. Growing our local economies and creating more jobs is a critical part of our public service, and we know we must compete on the global stage to secure the long-term economic interests of our communities. With 95% of the world’s consumers outside our borders, our country’s economic success is inherently linked to international engagement. In fact, over 36 million jobs nationwide are directly supported by global commerce. By effectively investing in new markets overseas, we can create better paying jobs and identify new customers for American goods and services. We can’t sit back and let other countries like China shut us out of these critical markets. Further, with international students and visitors contributing an additional $300 billion to our local economies and directly supporting over 1.5 million jobs, millions of Americans depend on U.S.
    [Show full text]