Environmental Report 1993

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Report 1993 Environmental Report 1993 UCRL-50027-93 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lead Compositor The cover for this year’s publication was designed by Beverly L. Chamberlain Lee Dravidzius of LLNL’s Technical Information Department. He used a scanned Photoshop image with a mask for the graphics The final cover is in Adobe Art and Design Illustrator. Lee Dravidzius Composition Jill S. Sprinkle Publication Services Candy K. Justin This report was created using electronic publishing. The word processing and layout were performed using Microsoft Word on the Macintosh, and the art was created using Adobe Illustrator. For additional information about this report, please contact: Bert Heffner, Area Relations Manager, LLNL Public Affairs Department P.O. Box 808, L-404 Livermore, CA 94550 (510) 424-4026 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe on pri- vately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial products, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract W-7405-Eng-48. Environmental Report 1993 Authors Gretchen M. Gallegos Paula J. Tate Brian K. Balke Eric Christofferson Robert J. Harrach William G. Hoppes Rebecca A. Failor Saundra M. Wander Barbara C. Fields Lucinda M. Garcia Allen R. Grayson Contributing Authors Kris A. Surano Donald H. MacQueen Richard G. Blake Michael J. Taffet Sabre J. Coleman Charlene H. Grandfield Charlotte M. Van Warmerdam Jennifer M. Larson Frank J. Gouveia William F. Isherwood Editor Gloria C. Wilt September 1, 1994 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-50027-93 Distribution Category UC-902 Preface This report is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). This publication presents the results of LLNL’s environmental monitoring and compliance effort and provides an assessment of the impact of LLNL operations on the environment. As in the 1992 report, data are presented in Système International (SI) units. This is consistent with the federal law stated in the Metric Conversion Action of 1975 (15 United States Code 205a et seq.); Presidential Executive Order 12770, Metric Usage in Federal Government programs (July 25, 1991); and DOE’s policy on the use of the metric system (DOE Order 5900.2), which states in part that “All Departmental Elements should take steps, as directed by Executive Order 12770, to use the Metric System (SI) in procurements, grants, publications, and other business-related activities.” Radiological results are presented in becquerels, and summary statistics are repeated in curies (1 Bq = 2.7 × 10−11 Ci). Similarly, dose is presented in millisieverts and summary statistics are repeated in millirem (1 mSv = 100 mrem). Results for both the Livermore site and Site 300 are presented in each chapter, and trends in monitoring data are shown graphically. This document is the responsibility of the Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Division of the EPD. Within this division, personnel from the Environmental Monitoring Section (EMS) sampled the environment, interpreted the results, performed the impact analysis of radiological emissions from LLNL, and compiled the information presented here. Monitoring data were obtained through the combined efforts of the EMS, the Nuclear Chemistry Division, the Radiological Analytical Sciences laboratory, and the Hazards Control Department of LLNL. Special recognition is deserved for the dedication and professionalism of these environmental monitoring technicians—Paris E. Althouse, Gary A. Bear, David L. Graves, Renee Needens,* Terrance W. Poole, Donald G. Ramsey, Judith N. Rose, Rebecca J. Ward, and Rhonda L. Welsh—and to these data management personnel—Nina Hankla,* Jennifer Clark,* Colleen R. Frost, Kimberly A. Stanford, and Connie Wells.* Thanks also to Judith L. Kelly* for initial preparation of Appendix A. LLNL Environmental Report for 1993 iii Preface In addition, the following people made significant contributions to this report: Other EPD Contributors David H. Armstrong Saverio P. Mancieri Virginia Baldwin* Sandra E. Mathews Shari L. Brigdon Grace Massa* Jenean Brothers* Michael P. Meltzer Bruce E. Campbell Matthew L. Mlekush* Tina M. Carlsen Cari E. McCormack Steven J. Cerruti Joseph R. McIntyre Michelle L. Corcoran Keith H. Otsuki Angie M. Dennis Ruth A. Presley Larry F. Finnie Ann M. Ruth Karen J. Folks John M. Sims Stephanie S. Goodwin Janet L. Tweed Stephen P. Harris Robert J. Vellinger Colleen J. Haskins* Robin A. Wendt Richard K. Henry Kent L. Wilson Joy M. Hirabayashi Kenneth C. Zahn Contributors from Other Departments Bryan B. Bandong, Nuclear Chemistry G. Bryant Hudson, Nuclear Chemistry Michael E. Barnett, Defense Sciences Terrence A. Jokela, Health & Ecological Jeanne M. Bazan, Nuclear Chemistry Assessment Arthur H. Biermann, Hazards Control Steven A. Kreek, Nuclear Chemistry MaryAnne R. Cox, Hazards Control Mary Ann Lee, Hazards Control H. Wayne Culham, Nuclear Chemistry Susan C. MacLean, Hazards Control Connie DeGrange, Plant Operations Gary L. Seibel, Hazards Control William L. Edwards, Jr.,* Nuclear Rohit K. Shah, Hazards Control Chemistry David G. Trombino, Hazards Control Curtis L. Graham, Hazards Control Bertha Weaver, Plant Operations Mark Grubbs, Hazards Control Joane M. Westermark, Hazards Control Everett B. Guthrie, Nuclear Chemistry Fowzia N. Zaka, Nuclear Chemistry Howard L. Hall, Nuclear Chemistry *Contract employee iv LLNL Environmental Report for 1993 Table of Contents List of Figures ....................................................................................................... xiii List of Tables ........................................................................................................ xvii Executive Summary ............................................................................................. EX-1 Introduction .................................................................................................. EX-1 Environmental Monitoring Results ........................................................... EX-1 Radiological Impact Assessment ............................................................... EX-5 Environmental Compliance Activities ...................................................... EX-6 Conclusion..................................................................................................... EX-8 1. Site Overview............................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1-1 Location ......................................................................................................... 1-1 Operations ..................................................................................................... 1-3 Climate........................................................................................................... 1-3 Geology.......................................................................................................... 1-4 Topography ..................................................................................... 1-4 Hydrogeology.................................................................................. 1-5 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 1-8 2. Compliance Summary ................................................................................ 2-1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 2-1 CERCLA/SARA—Title I............................................................................. 2-1 Livermore-Site Ground Water Project ......................................... 2-2 Site 300 Environmental Restoration Project ................................ 2-5 SARA—Title III............................................................................................. 2-10 Waste Permitting.......................................................................................... 2-11 Hazardous Waste Management Activities.................................. 2-11 Hazardous Waste Reports for 1992 and 1993.............................. 2-12 Hazardous Waste Permit ............................................................... 2-12 Extremely Hazardous Waste Permit ............................................ 2-12 Hazardous Waste Transport Registration ................................... 2-12 Tiered Permitting Conditional Exemption.................................. 2-13 Medical Waste Permit ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs During 2020–2024
    IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Acetaldehyde (CAS No. 75-07-0) ................................................................................................. 3 Acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) ....................................................................................................... 4 Acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1) .................................................................................................... 5 Acrylonitrile (CAS No. 107-13-1) ................................................................................................ 6 Aflatoxins (CAS No. 1402-68-2) .................................................................................................. 8 Air pollutants and underlying mechanisms for breast cancer ....................................................... 9 Airborne gram-negative bacterial endotoxins ............................................................................. 10 Alachlor (chloroacetanilide herbicide) (CAS No. 15972-60-8) .................................................. 10 Aluminium (CAS No. 7429-90-5) .............................................................................................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • Sunol Quarry Conservation Plan
    Conservation Plan For Sunol Quarry SMP-30 Site A Conservation Plan by Oliver de Silva, Inc. to Enhance the Biological Resources of the Sunol Quarry SMP-30 Project Area in Alameda County, California December 15, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Conservation Plan was prepared by Oliver de Silva, Inc., the Alameda Creek Alliance, and the Center for Biological Diversity, to protect and enhance the biological resources in the vicinity of the Sunol Quarry Site in the Sunol Valley. The conservation measures in this plan will significantly reduce the potential impacts of Sunol Quarry mining operations on native wildlife species and their habitats, will provide further mitigation for unavoidable biological impacts, and will benefit special-status species and their habitats in the vicinity of the project. As detailed herein, Oliver de Silva (“ODS”) will fund, implement and monitor the avoidance, mitigation, and restoration measures detailed in this Conservation Plan to best protect and conserve special-status species and their habitats prior to and during the development of quarry operations at the Sunol Quarry, under Surface Mining Permit 30 (“SMP-30”), Revised SMP-30 and Further Revised SMP-30. In 2006 ODS submitted a proposal for a mining lease in the Sunol Valley, SMP-30. ODS contemplates additional, future mining operations at the SMP-30 site, subject to the Approval of a revised surface mining permit for the site (“Revised SMP-30”) and a further revised surface mining permit for the site (“Further Revised SMP-30”). Activities under SMP-30 and Revised SMP-30 are separate and distinct projects, with independent utility, from mining activities at Apperson Ridge pursuant to SMP-17 and Revised SMP-17.
    [Show full text]
  • Compound Formula Tin (II) Nitride Silver Oxide Lithium Sulfide Magnesium Sulfide
    Ionic Bonding Drill Write the correct formula for the following compounds Compound Formula tin (II) nitride silver oxide lithium sulfide magnesium sulfide copper (I) nitride AgCl boron iodide potassium fluoride copper (I) chloride is CuCl iron (II) oxide is FeO tin (IV) fluoride is SnF4 nickel (II) fluoride is NiF2 lead (IV) oxide is PbO2 silver chloride is calcium iodide is CaI2 potassium bromide sodium phosphide iron (II) chloride copper (I) bromide lead (II) sulfide lead (IV) nitride beryllium nitride potassium bromide is KBr sodium phosphide is Na3P iron (II) chloride is FeCl2 copper (I) bromide is CuBr lead (II) sulfide is PbS lead (IV) nitride is Pb3N4 beryllium nitride is Be3N2 copper (I) chloride iron (II) oxide tin (IV) fluoride nickel (II) fluoride lead (IV) oxide Ag2O silver chloride calcium iodide Answers copper (I) nitride is Cu3N boron iodide is BI3 potassium fluoride is KF silver oxide is lithium sulfide is Li2S magnesium sulfide is MgS tin (II) nitride is Sn3N2 Ionic Bonding Drill Write the correct formula for the following compounds Compound Formula lithium bromide sodium sulfide lead (II) chloride nickel (II) oxide AlBr3 copper (II) oxide AlI3 iron (II) fluoride tin (II) oxide iron (II) oxide is FeO lead (II) oxide is PbO aluminum bromide is potassium oxide is K2O potassium oxide is K2O aluminum iodide is lead (II) nitride is Pb3N2 tin (IV) sulfide iron (III) sulfide lead (II) nitride copper (II) oxide silver fluoride AgF sodium chloride magnesium bromide tin (IV) sulfide is SnS2 iron (III) sulfide is Fe2S3 lead (II)
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/074683 Al 19 May 2016 (19.05.2016) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/074683 Al 19 May 2016 (19.05.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 15/10 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/DK20 15/050343 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 11 November 2015 ( 11. 1 1.2015) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (25) Filing Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (26) Publication Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: PA 2014 00655 11 November 2014 ( 11. 1 1.2014) DK (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/077,933 11 November 2014 ( 11. 11.2014) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 62/202,3 18 7 August 2015 (07.08.2015) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: LUNDORF PEDERSEN MATERIALS APS TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, [DK/DK]; Nordvej 16 B, Himmelev, DK-4000 Roskilde DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (DK).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Planning Department Case No
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Written comments should be sent to: Timothy Johnston 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 [email protected] Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Planning Department Case No. 2012.0054E Preliminary MND Publication Date: February 18, 2015 Preliminary MND Public Comment Period: February 18, 2015–March 20, 2015 Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: February 18, 2015 Case No.: 2012.0054E Project Title: 505 Paloma Road, Sunol, CA Sunol Long Term Improvements Project Parcel Nos.: 96-375-12-2; 96-375-14 Project Site Size: Approximately 44 acres including access and staging areas Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Timothy Johnston – (415) 575-9035 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to implement the Sunol Long Term Improvements (SLTI) Project (the “project”), which is comprised of two main elements: improvements to the existing Sunol Corporation Yard (Sunol Yard) and development of a new interpretive center, to be named “the Alameda Creek Watershed Center” (Watershed Center), in the vicinity of the Sunol Water Temple. The proposed project site is located in a primarily rural setting, south of the Town of Sunol and west of the State Route 84/Interstate 680 junction, in Alameda County, California. Adjoining the project site are gravel quarry operations, the Sunol Water Temple and Agricultural Park, Alameda Creek, Arroyo de la Laguna, SFPUC water supply facilities, and the Town of Sunol. The project would be implemented at two areas within the SFPUC property located 505 Paloma Road, in Sunol, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Itetall IC BROMIDES AS CATALYSTS in THE
    QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ;itETALL IC BROMIDES AS CATALYSTS IN THE FRIED.liL-CRAFTS KETONE SYNTHESIS i QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF MET ALLIC BROMIDES AS CATAL YSTS IN THE FRIEDEL-CRAFTS KETONE SYNTHESIS By Peter Taketoshi M,, ori Bachelor of .Arts Park College Parkville, Missouri 1945 Submitted to the Department of Chemistry Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the r equirement for t he Degree of Master of Science 194'~ ii \ APPROVED BY: Chairman, Thesis Committee Head of the Department ~he~ ( ~uate~~ School 2174~10 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author wis hes to express his s i neere gr atitude to Dr . O. C. Dermer under whose guidance t his work has been accomplished . He also wi s hes to express hi s a ppreciation to the Chemi stry Department for t he s uppl y of chemicals used. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS "P age Introduction • • l Historical • • • • 2 Experimental • • • • 5 Procadure • • • • • • • • 9 Table of results . • • • • • • • 12 Discussion of results • .. • • • • • • 15 Summary • • • • • • • • 22 Bibliography • • • • • • • • • • 23 Biography • • • • • • • • • • • 25 1 I NTRODCCT ION T~lis is a continuation of the s t udy of catalystf for the Friedel­ Crafts ketone synt hesis star ted by Wilson ( .38 ), a nd continued by Suguj.­ tan (34), Johnson (17), and Billme ier (4). Ma ny metallic chlorides have been used in t his reacti on, but metallic bromides, as cat alyst s, have been rather neelected . It is the purpose of this work to study the ef fectiveness of some of the metallic bromides by following essentially the experimental pro­ cedure of Billmeier (4). 2 HISTORICAL In 1877, the French chemist Friedel and his American colleague Crafts (12) discovered the f amous Friedel-Crafts reaction, which now has s uch great industrial a pplication (7 , 13, 18, 35).
    [Show full text]
  • Complexes of Unsaturated and Other Organoberyllium Compounds
    Durham E-Theses Complexes of unsaturated and other organoberyllium compounds Francis, B. R. How to cite: Francis, B. R. (1970) Complexes of unsaturated and other organoberyllium compounds, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8700/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk COMPIEXES OF UNSATURATED AND OTHER ORGANOBERYLLIUM COMPOUNDS BY B. R. FRANCIS, B.Sc. 1— A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Durham. JANUARY 1970 Ac knowledgeme nts The author wishes to express his sincere thanks to Professor G.E.Coates, NI.A., D.Sc, F.R.I.C., under whose supervision this research was carried out, for his advice and encouragement both personally and academically, and also to many members of the Chemistry Departments of the University of Durham and the University of Wyoming for their help, enthusiasm and friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Planning Department
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE 1650 Mission St. 3ovemof's Offiee of Planning &Researc h Suite 400 San Francisco , DEC 04 2019 Availability of Recirculated Portions of CA 94103-2479 Draft Environmental Impact Report Re ceptio n: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 415.558.6378 Date: December 4, 2019 Fax: Case No.: 2015-004827ENV 415 .558.6409 Project Title: SFPUC Alameda Creek Recapture Project Pl anning Location: Alameda County on watershed lands owned by Informati on: 415.558.6377 the City and County of San Francisco Project Sponsor: Antonia Sivyer, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (415) 554-2474 Staff Contact: Chris Kern, Principal Planner - (415) 575-9037 [email protected] The San Francisco Planning Department has prepared recirculated portions of the draft environmental impact report (EIR) in connection with this project. The report is available for public review and can be accessed online at the planning department's website at: https:ljsfplanning.org/environrnental-review-docurnents. Paper copies are also available at the: Planning Information Center at 1660 Mission Street, 1st Floor, San Francisco; San Francisco Main Library, 100 Larkin Street, San Francisco, California; and Alameda County Main Library, 2450 Stevenson Boulevard, Fremont, California. Referenced materials are available for review at the planning department's office on the fourth floor of 1650 Mission Street as part of Case File Number 2015- 004827ENV. Project Description: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) is proposing the Alameda Creek Recapture Project (ACRP) as part of improvements to its regional water system. The ACRP is a water supply project that would be located in the Sunol Valley in Alameda County on lands owned by the City and County of San Francisco and managed by the SFPUC.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Background Document (U.S
    Part 5: CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS Chemical-specific parameters required for calculating soil screening levels include the organic carbon normalized soil-water partition coefficient for organic compounds (Koc), the soil-water partition coefficient for inorganic constituents (Kd), water solubility (S), Henry's law constant (HLC, HN), air diffusivity (Di,a), and water diffusivity (Di,w). In addition, the octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) is needed to calculate Koc values. This part of the background document describes the collection and compilation of these parameters for the SSL chemicals. With the exception of values for air diffusivity (Di,a), water diffusivity (Di,w), and certain Koc values, all of the values used in the development of SSLs can be found in the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM). SCDM is a computer code that includes more than 25 datafiles containing specific chemical parameters used to calculate factor and benchmark values for the Hazard Ranking System (HRS). Because SCDM datafiles are regularly updated, the user should consult the most recent version of SCDM to ensure that the values are up to date. 5.1 Solubility, Henry's Law Constant, and Kow Chemical-specific values for solubility, Henry's law constant (HLC), and Kow were obtained from SCDM. In the selection of the value for SCDM, measured or analytical values are favored over calculated values. However, in the event that a measured value is not available, calculated values are used. Table 36 presents the solubility, Henry's law constant, and Kow values taken from SCDM and used to calculate SSLs. Henry's law constant values were available for all but two of the constituents of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Remedial Action Guidelines (Rags) for Contaminated Sites
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection Remedial Action Guidelines for Contaminated Sites (RAGs) Effective Date: May 1, 2021 Approved by: ___________________________ Date: April 27, 2021 David Burns, Director Bureau of Remediation & Waste Management Executive Summary MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 17 State House Station | Augusta, Maine 04333-0017 www.maine.gov/dep Maine Department of Environmental Protection Remedial Action Guidelines for Contaminated Sites Contents 1 Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................... 1 2.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Consistency with Superfund Risk Assessment .............................................................................. 1 2.3 When to Use RAGs and When to Develop a Site-Specific Risk Assessment ................................. 1 3 Applicability ................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Applicable Programs & DEP Approval Process ............................................................................. 2 3.1.1 Uncontrolled Hazardous Substance Sites ............................................................................. 2 3.1.2 Voluntary Response Action Program
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Names and CAS Numbers Final
    Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number C3H8O 1‐propanol C4H7BrO2 2‐bromobutyric acid 80‐58‐0 GeH3COOH 2‐germaacetic acid C4H10 2‐methylpropane 75‐28‐5 C3H8O 2‐propanol 67‐63‐0 C6H10O3 4‐acetylbutyric acid 448671 C4H7BrO2 4‐bromobutyric acid 2623‐87‐2 CH3CHO acetaldehyde CH3CONH2 acetamide C8H9NO2 acetaminophen 103‐90‐2 − C2H3O2 acetate ion − CH3COO acetate ion C2H4O2 acetic acid 64‐19‐7 CH3COOH acetic acid (CH3)2CO acetone CH3COCl acetyl chloride C2H2 acetylene 74‐86‐2 HCCH acetylene C9H8O4 acetylsalicylic acid 50‐78‐2 H2C(CH)CN acrylonitrile C3H7NO2 Ala C3H7NO2 alanine 56‐41‐7 NaAlSi3O3 albite AlSb aluminium antimonide 25152‐52‐7 AlAs aluminium arsenide 22831‐42‐1 AlBO2 aluminium borate 61279‐70‐7 AlBO aluminium boron oxide 12041‐48‐4 AlBr3 aluminium bromide 7727‐15‐3 AlBr3•6H2O aluminium bromide hexahydrate 2149397 AlCl4Cs aluminium caesium tetrachloride 17992‐03‐9 AlCl3 aluminium chloride (anhydrous) 7446‐70‐0 AlCl3•6H2O aluminium chloride hexahydrate 7784‐13‐6 AlClO aluminium chloride oxide 13596‐11‐7 AlB2 aluminium diboride 12041‐50‐8 AlF2 aluminium difluoride 13569‐23‐8 AlF2O aluminium difluoride oxide 38344‐66‐0 AlB12 aluminium dodecaboride 12041‐54‐2 Al2F6 aluminium fluoride 17949‐86‐9 AlF3 aluminium fluoride 7784‐18‐1 Al(CHO2)3 aluminium formate 7360‐53‐4 1 of 75 Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number Al(OH)3 aluminium hydroxide 21645‐51‐2 Al2I6 aluminium iodide 18898‐35‐6 AlI3 aluminium iodide 7784‐23‐8 AlBr aluminium monobromide 22359‐97‐3 AlCl aluminium monochloride
    [Show full text]
  • EICG-Hot Spots
    State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE EMISSION INVENTORY CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES REPORT FOR THE AIR TOXICS “HOT SPOTS” PROGRAM STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS DATE OF RELEASE: September 29, 2020 SCHEDULED FOR CONSIDERATION: November 19, 2020 Location: Please see the Public Agenda which will be posted ten days before the November 19, 2020, Board Meeting for any appropriate direction regarding a possible remote-only Board Meeting. If the meeting is to be held in person, it will be held at the California Air Resources Board, Byron Sher Auditorium, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814. This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................. 5 II. THE PROBLEM THAT THE PROPOSAL IS INTENDED TO ADDRESS .................... 6 III. BENEFITS ANTICIPATED FROM THE REGULATORY ACTION, INCLUDING THE BENEFITS OR GOALS PROVIDED IN THE AUTHORIZING STATUTE .................... 8 IV. AIR QUALITY ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]