DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the US Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the US Congress FEDERAL OCEAN AND COASTAL ACTIVITIES REPORT TO THE U.S. CONGRESS For Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 Prepared by The White House Council on Environmental Quality and The White House Office of Science & Technology Policy Issued July 19, 2013 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Federal Funding Summary…………………………………………………………..…3 Federal Agency Highlights…………………………………………………………….4 Appendix: Agency Budget Tables and Narratives Department of Agriculture …………………………………………….……………...A2 Department of Commerce …………………………………………….………………A11 Department of Defense ………………………………………………….……….……A20 Department of Energy …………………………………………………………….…..A26 Environmental Protection Agency ……………………………………………………A30 Department of Health and Human Services …………………………………………..A36 Department of Homeland Security ……………………………………………………A42 Department of the Interior .……………………………………………………………A48 Marine Mammal Commission ……………………………………………………...…A66 National Aeronautics and Space Administration .……………………….……...……..A68 National Science Foundation …………………………………………………….……A73 Smithsonian Institution ………………………………………………………………..A77 Department of State and USAID ……………………………………………………...A79 Department of Transportation …………………………………………………………A85 Department of Treasury ……………………………………………………………….A91 2010-2011 Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the U.S. Congress INTRODUCTION The Oceans Act of 2000 requires that a report of Highlighting Efforts in Support Federal ocean and coastal activities be submitted to Congress every two years. This report of the National Ocean Policy provides an overview of Federal programs related to ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes activities for The National Ocean Policy provides a framework Fiscal Years (FY) 2010 and 2011. to pursue national and regional stewardship goals through coordinated actions across the Federal The ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes Government informed by State, tribal, and local deeply impact the lives of all Americans, whether authorities, stakeholders, and the public. This we live and work in the country’s heartland or report for FY 2010 and 2011 provides narrative along its shores. America’s rich and productive examples of department and agency activities that coastal regions and waters support tens of align with the Policy. millions of jobs and contribute trillions of dollars to the national economy each year. They also In January of 2012, the NOC sought public host a growing number of important activities, comment on a draft National Ocean Policy including commerce, transportation, energy Implementation Plan (Plan) that identified development, national security, recreation, and specific actions Federal agencies would take to science, and they provide a wealth of natural carry forward the National Ocean Policy. The resources and ecological benefits. Yet the ocean, final Implementation Plan, released in April coasts, and Great Lakes face a wide range of 2013, reflects stakeholder and public comments. threats from human activities. For this report, the Council on Environmental Two bipartisan ocean commissions recognized Quality (CEQ), Office of Science and that if Americans are to enjoy the maximum Technology Policy (OSTP), and the Office of benefit from our ocean resources, Federal Management and Budget (OMB) worked with agencies managing ocean-related activities need departments and agencies to identify and provide to share data and coordinate better. On July 19, information on activities in 2010 and 2011 that 2010, President Barack Obama signed an work to carry forward the National Ocean Policy. Executive Order (E.O.) establishing for the first Consistent with the last report, these activities are time a national policy for the stewardship of the organized by the nine national priority objectives ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes – identified in the Executive Order that established commonly referred to as the National Ocean the National Ocean Policy, and are presented in Policy (Policy).1 The E.O. adopted the Final the “Federal Agency Highlights” section. The Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean next report may organize these activities Policy Task Force and directed Federal agencies differently based on the Implementation Plan. to implement them under the guidance of the National Ocean Council (NOC). Agency Budget Information Budgetary data from all agencies involved in ocean and coastal activities are collected in the Appendix, with information provided for the FY 2010 and FY 2011 actual obligations and the FY 1 Executive Order 13547, Stewardship of the Ocean, 2012 enacted level. Consistent with past reports, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes, July 19, 2010, can the agency budget information as presented in the be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/2010stew ardship-eo.pdf 1 2010-2011 Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the U.S. Congress Appendix is presented to support four ocean policy-related themes. The themes are:2 • Enhancing the Use, Conservation and Management of Ocean, Coastal, and Great Lakes Resources, • Advancing Our Understanding of Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes, • Supporting Maritime Transportation, and • Advancing International Ocean Science and Policy. Looking Ahead As implementation of the National Ocean Policy continues, the information presented in future reports will evolve with the implementation of the Policy to reflect how existing Federal ocean and coastal activities and programs align with the Policy and the themes in the Implementation Plan. 2 These four themes are based on the U.S. Ocean Action Plan of 2004. Consistent with past reports, the themes of “enhancing the use and conservation of our ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources” and “managing coasts and their watersheds” have been combined into the single category of “enhancing the use, conservation and management of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources.” 2 2010-2011 Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the U.S. Congress FEDERAL FUNDING SUMMARY Table 1 shows the amount of funding for ocean supporting maritime transportation, (3) advancing and coastal activities for FY 2010 (actual), FY our understanding of oceans, coasts, and Great 2011 (actual), and FY 2012 (enacted). Consistent Lakes, and (4) advancing international ocean with past reports, these figures are based on science policy. These data are intended to subjective determinations regarding the various provide a general understanding of the agency programs that align, in whole or in part, investments the Federal Government is making in with each of the four thematic areas of (1) ocean and coastal activities. Funding for future enhancing the use, conservation and management fiscal years will be determined through the of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources, (2) Administration’s annual budget process. Table 1: Summary of Funding by Agency (Dollars in Millions) FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Actual Agency FY 2012 Enacted Obligatio ns Obligatio ns Department of Agric ulture 544.0 552.5 591.7 De pa rt me nt o f Co mme rc e 2,544.9 2,187.5 2,116.6 Department of Defense 814.0 863.1 1,759.7 Department of Energy 94.6 97.8 126.4 Environmental Protection Agency 2,062.8 1,526.6 1,475.6 Department of Health and Human Services 81.6 99.2 82.6 Department of Homeland Security 3,557.5 3,598.3 3,644.9 Department of the Interior 730.7 886.4 934.2 Ma rine Ma mma l Co mmis s io n 3.3 3.3 3.3 National Aeronautic s and Spac e Administration 104.5 100.6 85.6 National Sc ienc e Foundation 531.0 552.2 527.2 Smithsonian Institution 3.1 2.9 3.1 Department of State 72.5 68.6 54.5 Department of Transportation 574.2 573.0 559.2 Department of Treasury 8.0 9.0 12.0 U.S. Agency for International Development 38.1 51.1 47.3 TOTAL 11,764.7 11,172.1 12,023.9 3 2010-2011 Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the U.S. Congress FEDERAL AGENCY HIGHLIGHTS Listed below are examples of Federal agency management decisions. Both agencies were activities for FY 2010 and 2011 that support the primary contributors to the development of National Ocean Policy’s priority objectives. It is ocean.data.gov. In addition, the Energy Policy important to note that this list is not exhaustive in Act of 2005 directed Federal agencies to develop that it only represents a portion of those activities an outer continental shelf mapping initiative to that most closely align with each objective. assist in renewable energy use decision-making. NOAA and BOEM collaborated to develop the HOW WE DO BUSINESS Multipurpose Marine Cadastre, a multi-purpose online information system that provides the Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) necessary geospatial framework for broader regional marine planning initiatives including National Oceanic and Atmospheric renewable energy siting. Administration (NOAA) - National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS): NMFS continued the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG): Consistent with the advancement of ecosystem-based management goals and principles of marine planning, the through the creation of Integrated Ecosystem USCG initiated a comprehensive Atlantic Coast Assessments (IEA) for large marine ecosystems. Port Access Route Study (ACPARS) to promote IEAs bring scientific and technological rigor to safe, efficient maritime operations in conjunction resource management decisions by incorporating with the development and production of diverse sources of data, including socio-economic renewable offshore energy. Among other things, data, into ecosystem models that evaluate trade- this ACPARS supports DOI’s Smart from the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Science, Marine Restoration, and the Oceans Act of 2000
    Taking the Long View of Ocean Ecosystems: Historical Science, Marine Restoration, and the Oceans Act of 2000 Robin Kundis Craig* This is what is threatened today: the ancient, living, sacred sea. A sea which provides the primary source of protein for millions of poor people throughout the world. A sea which has deeply spiritual, as well as practical,importance. Our children may inheritan impostor ocean, a sickly ghost, drained of animal life and crowded with pathogens.' CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................. 650 I. The Current State of U.S. Ocean Regulation ................................ 657 A. Shortcoming #1: Geographic Fragmentation of Ocean M anagem ent ............................................................................... 658 B. Shortcoming #2: Regulatory Fragmentation and C om plexity ................................................................................. 662 1. Offshore Oil and Gas Regulation ...................................... 662 2. M arine W ater Pollution ...................................................... 663 3. Lack of Regulatory Coordination ..................................... 665 C. Shortcoming #3: Resource-by-Resource and Species-by- Species R egulation .................................................................... 666 II. Restoration of Marine Environments and the Oceans Act of 2000 .....................................................................................................671 A. The Impetus for
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Developments in Ocean and Coastal Law 2000 Karla J
    Ocean and Coastal Law Journal Volume 6 | Number 1 Article 11 2001 A Review Of Developments In Ocean And Coastal Law 2000 Karla J. Black University of Maine School of Law Greg Domareki University of Maine School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj Recommended Citation Karla J. Black & Greg Domareki, A Review Of Developments In Ocean And Coastal Law 2000, 6 Ocean & Coastal L.J. (2001). Available at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj/vol6/iss1/11 This Recent Developments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ocean and Coastal Law Journal by an authorized administrator of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN OCEAN AND COASTAL LAW 2000 Karla J. Black and Greg Domareki* DOMESTIC I. LEGISLATION A. Oceans Act of 2000 This year the 106th Congress passed, and President Clinton signed into law, the Oceans Act of 2000. The Act creates a national oceans commis- sion. The 16 member Commission will study the nation's ocean and coastal policies. The Commission will bring together coastal experts, policy makers, environmental groups and industry representatives to address several ocean issues, such as coastal development, overfishing, polluted runoff and degradation of coral reefs. These issues necessitate a need for a coordinated plan to manage the nation's coastal and marine resources. The Act illustrates a growing concern in the political sphere for the world's oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. a Closer Look at US Marine Spatial
    From the Forest to the Sea: Lessons in Managing Public Space by Morgan Gopnik Marine Science and Conservation Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Orbach, Supervisor ___________________________ Xavier Basurto ___________________________ Lisa Campbell ___________________________ Larry Crowder ___________________________ Josh Eagle Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Science and Conservation in the Graduate School of Duke University 2013 i v ABSTRACT From the Forest to the Sea: Lessons in Managing Public Space by Morgan Gopnik Marine Science and Conservation Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Orbach, Supervisor ___________________________ Xavier Basurto ___________________________ Lisa Campbell ___________________________ Larry Crowder ___________________________ Josh Eagle An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Science and Conservation in the Graduate School of Duke University 2013 Copyright by Morgan Gopnik 2013 Abstract In 2004, a report from the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy documented a broad range of ecological problems in U.S. ocean waters, including declining fish stocks, changes in marine biodiversity, coastal habitat loss, and hypoxic “dead zones,” as well as related governance problems, such as uncoordinated and contradictory laws, underfunded programs,
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Version)
    CBO REPORT Unauthorized Appropriations and Expiring Authorizations pursuant to Section 202(e)(3) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, as Amended (Senate Version) January 15, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE SECOND AND D STREETS, SW WASHINGTON, DC 20515 Preface This report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) satisfies the requirements of section 202(e)(3) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, as amended. The purpose of the report is to help the Congress adopt authorizing legislation that should be in place before it considers the 13 regular appropriation bills for fiscal year 2005, which begins on October 1, 2004. Ordinarily, this annual report shows the total amount that the Congress has provided in appropriation acts for programs whose authorization has expired. At the time that this report was prepared, however, only six of the 13 regular appropriation acts had been enacted for fiscal year 2004 (Defense, energy and water, Homeland Security, Interior and related agencies, legislative branch, and military construction). Programs covered by the other seven appropriation acts are currently funded under a temporary continuing resolution (Public Law 108-135), which expires on January 31, 2004. For those programs, information on appropriations is unavailable. That fact is noted on entries in Appendix A, which consequently omits figures and totals relating to unauthorized appropriations for those programs. The Scorekeeping Unit of CBO’s Budget Analysis Division prepared this report, under the direction of Janet Airis. The other members of that unit are Joanna Capps, Catherine Little, Virginia Myers, Robert Sempsey, and Jason Wheelock. The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of CBO’s Ellen Hays, Sandy Davis, Mary Froehlich, and Lenny Skutnik, as well as numerous staff members of Congressional committees.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Current Regional Governance Models
    01__CHRISTIE.DOC 6/12/2006 11:03 AM IMPLEMENTING AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO OCEAN MANAGEMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT REGIONAL GOVERNANCE MODELS DONNA R. CHRISTIE† I. INTRODUCTION The two recent national ocean policy studies considering the fate of United States’ oceans in the twenty-first century, conducted by the Pew Oceans Commission1 and the United States Commission on Ocean Policy (“USCOP”),2 were largely in agreement on some very fundamental issues. First, both commissions concluded that human activities have severely stressed ocean systems and that major changes in ocean management are needed to stop degradation of ocean resources and to restore and protect the oceans for future generations.3 Second, the commissions found that better management of the oceans required an ecosystem-based approach, implemented through coordinated, regional mechanisms.4 However, the jurisdictions of our federal and state governments currently are not organized to operate or take actions at regional levels.5 Any proposals † Elizabeth C. & Clyde W. Atkinson Professor of Law, Florida State University College of Law; B.S. Chem. 1969, University of Georgia; J.D. 1978, University of Georgia; Post Doc. 1978-1980, Marine Policy and Ocean Management Program, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. 1. PEW OCEANS COMM’N, AMERICA’S LIVING OCEANS: CHARTING A COURSE FOR SEA CHANGE (2003) [hereinafter PEW REPORT], available at http://www.pewtrusts.org/pdf/ env_pew_oceans_final_report.pdf. 2. U.S. COMM’N ON OCEAN POLICY, AN OCEAN BLUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: FINAL REPORT OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY (2004) [hereinafter USCOP REPORT], available at http://www.oceancommission.gov/documents/full_color_rpt/ 000_ocean_full_report.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Atlantic Ocean Policy: Protecting the Mid-Atlantic Ocean’S Clean Ocean Economies and Ecosystems with Existing Tools and Innovative Legal Frameworks
    18 SEA GRANT LAW AND POLICY JOURNAL, Vol. 6, No. 1 2013 Mid-Atlantic Ocean Policy: Protecting the Mid-Atlantic Ocean’s Clean Ocean Economies and Ecosystems with Existing Tools and Innovative Legal Frameworks Sean T. Dixon & Angela Bransteitter1 Abstract: The Mid-Atlantic Ocean, at the intersection of the Gulf Stream, Labrador Current, and some of the nation’s oldest freshwater rivers, has a truly unique ecosystem. With centuries-old fishing, commerce, and recreational industries that anchor the region’s coastal communities, the economy of the Mid-Atlantic is similarly unique. The focus of this paper is to take a brief look at the trends and trajectories of the management of these ecological and economic systems (past and present) under existing laws, the new national ocean policy, and innovative frameworks. I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 18 II. A National Ocean Policy ................................................................................................................ 19 A. History of At-Sea Boundary Creation ....................................................................................... 19 B. History of the National Ocean Policy ........................................................................................ 22 C. The National Ocean Policy ....................................................................................................... 23 D. Federal Scope, Regional Flexibility ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Requirements of the Beaches Environmental Assessment And
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DIRECTORS ORDERS D.O 77-1 – Wetland Protection DO 77-1 establishes National Park Service (NPS) policies, requirements, and standards for implementing Executive Order (E.O.) 11990: "Protection of Wetlands" (42 Fed. Reg. 26961). Procedural Manual 77-1 can be found at: http://www.nature.nps.gov/water/wetlands/Wetlands Protection Manuals.cfm . This Manual contains detailed procedures that the NPS uses to implement the requirements of DO 77-1 and EO 11990. D.O 77-2 – Floodplain Management DO 77-2 implements the requirements set forth in EO 11988., which was promulgated to mitigate and avoid the impacts that occur as a result of the “occupancy and modification of floodplains”. The Order is meant to 1) Reduce the risk of flood loss; 2) Minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare; and 3) Restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. Procedural Manual 77-2 can be found at: http://www.nature.nps.gov/rm77/floodplain.cfm. Reference Manual - 83D1 – Bathing Beaches Manual 83D1 can be found at: http://www.nps.gov/public health/inter/info/rms/rm83d1.pdf. This manual details the procedures that parks should take to avoid the spread of waterborne diseases in beaches that are designated for bathing. This manual assists parks in complying with the requirements of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act of 2000. (Public Law 186-284) EXECUTIVE ORDERS Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management Executive Order 11988 requires Federal agencies to avoid, to the extent possible, the long and short term adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Regulation and Deregulation of U.S
    About the Authors Hana V. Vizcarra is Staff Attorney at Harvard Law School’s Environmental & Energy Law Program (EELP) where she leads EELP’s portfolio on private sector approaches to climate and environmental issues and conducts legal analysis on regulatory development in environmental and energy law. Before joining EELP in 2018, Hana practiced environmental law in Washington D.C. for two national law firms. In private practice she represented clients in complex environmental litigation, counseled on environmental compliance and regulation, and advised on environmental aspects of transactions. Before becoming an attorney, Hana spent seven years working in political research and communications. Hana received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and B.A. from Pomona College in California. Laura Bloomer is an EELP Legal Fellow beginning in Fall 2019. She is a 2019 graduate of Harvard Law School and Harvard Kennedy School, earning a J.D., cum laude, and a Masters in Public Policy. Prior to law school, Laura worked on President Obama’s reelection campaign and taught English in East Java, Indonesia with the Peace Corps. Laura received her B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin. Acknowledgments This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of authors Hana Vizcarra and Laura Bloomer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. The Harvard Law School Environmental & Energy Law Program influences policy discussions about environmental, climate, and energy issues. We apply rigorous legal analysis to identify shortcomings and opportunities for change in order to achieve improved environmental outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the US Congress
    FEDERAL OCEAN AND COASTAL ACTIVITIES REPORT TO THE U.S. CONGRESS For Calendar Years 2008 and 2009 Report Prepared by The White House Council on Environmental Quality and The White House Office of Science And Technology Policy Issued November 16, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 1 Federal Funding Summary…………………………………………………………...…4 Federal Agency Highlights……………………………………………………………..6 Appendix: Agency Budget Tables and Narratives Department of Agriculture …………………………………………….……………...A2 Department of Commerce …………………………………………….………………A6 Department of Defense ………………………………………………….……….……A13 Department of Energy …………………………………………………………….…..A20 Environmental Protection Agency ……………………………………………………A23 Department of Health and Human Services …………………………………………..A28 Department of Homeland Security ……………………………………………………A31 Department of the Interior .……………………………………………………………A35 Marine Mammal Commission ……………………………………………………...…A44 National Aeronautics and Space Administration .……………………….……...……..A46 National Science Foundation …………………………………………………….……A48 Smithsonian Institution ………………………………………………………………..A51 Department of State and USAID ……………………………………………………...A53 Department of Transportation …………………………………………………………A58 Department of Treasury ……………………………………………………………….A62 2008-2009 Federal Ocean and Coastal Activities Report to the U.S. Congress INTRODUCTION The Oceans Act of 2000 requires that a report of our Nation should pursue to further a Federal ocean and coastal activities be submitted comprehensive and integrated National Ocean
    [Show full text]
  • Review of U.S. Ocean and Coastal
    APPENDIX 6 to the Final Report REVIEW OF U. S. O CEAN AND COASTAL LAW THE EVOLUTION OF OCEAN GOVERNANCE OVER THREE DECADES You may electronically download this document from: http://www.oceancommission.gov This document may be cited as follows: Review of U.S. Ocean and Coastal Law The Evolution of Ocean Governance Over Three Decades Appendix 6 to An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Washington, D.C., 2004 ISBN#0–9759462–7–7 Appendix 6 Review of U.S. Ocean and Coastal Law PREFACE The Oceans Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-256) charged the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy with making recommendations for a coordinated and comprehensive national ocean policy to promote the protection of life and property, responsible stewardship of ocean and coastal resources, protection of the marine environment, prevention of pollution, enhancement of maritime commerce, expansion of human knowledge of the environment and the role of the oceans in climate change, investment in technologies to promote energy and food security, close cooperation among government agencies and the private sector, and preservation of U.S. leadership in ocean and coastal activities. To carry out this broad mandate, among other reviews and assessments required by the Act, Section 3(f) directed the Commission to include in its final report: A review of the cumulative effect of Federal laws and regulations on United States ocean and coastal activities and resources and an examination of those laws and regulations for inconsistencies and contradictions that might adversely affect those ocean and coastal activities and resources, and recommendations for resolving such inconsistencies to the extent practicable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shared Coast
    The Shared Coast ApplicationApplication ofof thethe OceanOcean CommissionCommission RecommendationsRecommendations inin MississippiMississippi andand AlabamaAlabama Josh Clemons, Research Counsel Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Legal Program This publication was supported by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Grant # NA16RG2258, The Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium and the University of Mississippi. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of any of those agencies. Publication No. MASGP 05-002 Mississippi-Alabama Production and Design: Waurene Roberson TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 The Commission’s Recommendations to the States . 1 Analysis of the Commission’s Recommendations . 3 Relevant State Government Entities . 9 Measures the State and Local Governments Can Take to Further the Commission’s Recommendations . 11 i INTRODUCTION On September 20, 2004, the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy released its final recommenda- tions for a new, comprehensive national ocean policy in a report entitled An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. Representing the first comprehensive review of the nation’s ocean policy in thir- ty-five years, the report outlines a strategy for ensuring the ongoing protection and sustainable use of the nation’s oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes. Congress established the Commission in the Oceans Act of 2000. The president appointed its sixteen members from an array of fields including government, academia, business, and industry. The Commission took testimony from scientific experts, elected officials, governmental managers and policy makers, interest groups and the general public. The Commission learned of a variety of threats to coastal areas, including pollution, declining fish populations, habitat loss, and inva- sive species.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling an Arctic Gap: Legal and Regulatory Possibilities for Canadian-U.S
    FILLING AN ARCTIC GAP: LEGAL AND REGULATORY POSSIBILITIES FOR CANADIAN-U.S. COOPERATION IN THE BEAUFORT SEA Betsy Baker† INTRODUCTION For the past two summers, the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent and the USCGC Healy have traveled together through the Arctic Ocean to map its continental shelf. On board these two icebreakers, operated respectively by the Canadian and United States Coast Guards, scientists from both countries work around the clock gathering data for national submissions to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf as established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.1 The two countries map together notwithstanding the fact that Canada has ratified the Convention and the United States has not,2 and in spite of a longstanding disagreement over the maritime boundary in the Arctic Ocean’s Beaufort Sea.3 The overlapping claims to ownership involve some 6,250 square nautical miles of pristine and potentially hydrocarbon-rich4 maritime territory within a triangle-shaped area north of Alaska, the Yukon Territory, and the Northwest Territories (NWT).5 [Figure 1, p. 120]. This “Beaufort Sea Associate Professor, Vermont Law School. The author presented an early version of this paper at the Arctic Change 2008 conference in Quebec City and will be expanding portions of it into a larger project during her 2009–2010 Fellowship at Dartmouth College’s John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding, Institute of Arctic Studies. She sailed with the USCGC Healy science crew in August 2008 (when the Healy sailed alone) and August–September 2009 (on the joint Healy-Louis cruise).
    [Show full text]