Download Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Download ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) OPEN ACCESS ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 26 December 2018 (Online & Print) Vol. 10 | No. 15 | 12907–13046 10.11609/jott.2018.10.15.12907-13046 www.threatenedtaxa.org Building evidence for conservationJ globally TTJournal of Threatened Taxa ISSN 0974-7907 (Online); ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Published by Typeset and printed at Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Zoo Outreach Organization No. 12, Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti - Kalapatti Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Ph: 0 938 533 9863 Email: [email protected], [email protected] www.threatenedtaxa.org EDITORS Christoph Kueffer, Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland Founder & Chief Editor Christoph Schwitzer, University of the West of England, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 3HA Dr. Sanjay Molur, Coimbatore, India Christopher L. Jenkins, The Orianne Society, Athens, Georgia Cleofas Cervancia, Univ. of Philippines Los Baños College Laguna, Philippines Managing Editor Colin Groves, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Mr. B. Ravichandran, Coimbatore, India Crawford Prentice, Nature Management Services, Jalan, Malaysia C.T. Achuthankutty, Scientist-G (Retd.), CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Goa Associate Editors Dan Challender, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Dr. B.A. Daniel, Coimbatore, India D.B. Bastawade, Maharashtra, India Dr. Ulrike Streicher, Wildlife Veterinarian, Danang, Vietnam D.J. Bhat, Retd. Professor, Goa University, Goa, India Ms. Priyanka Iyer, Coimbatore, India Dale R. Calder, Royal Ontaro Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Dr. Manju Siliwal, Dehra Dun, India Daniel Brito, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil Dr. Meena Venkataraman, Mumbai, India David Mallon, Manchester Metropolitan University, Derbyshire, UK David Olson, Zoological Society of London, UK Editorial Advisors Davor Zanella, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Ms. Sally Walker, Coimbatore, India Deepak Apte, Bombay Natural Hisotry Society, Mumbai, India Dr. Robert C. Lacy, Minnesota, USA Diana Doan-Crider, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA Dr. Russel Mittermeier, Virginia, USA Dietmar Zinner, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany Dr. Thomas Husband, Rhode Island, USA Dunston P.Ambrose, St. Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai, India Dr. Jacob V. Cheeran, Thrissur, India E. Vivekanandan, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, India Prof. Dr. Mewa Singh, Mysuru, India Eduard Vives, Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain Mr. Stephen D. Nash, Stony Brook, USA Eric Smith, University of Texas, Arlington, USA Dr. Fred Pluthero, Toronto, Canada Erin Wessling, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany Dr. Martin Fisher, Cambridge, UK Errol Vela, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France Dr. Ulf Gärdenfors, Uppsala, Sweden Farkhanda Manzoor Dugal, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan Dr. John Fellowes, Hong Kong F.B. Vincent Florens, University of Mauritius, Mauritius Dr. Philip S. Miller, Minnesota, USA Ferdinando Boero, Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy Prof. Dr. Mirco Solé, Brazil Francesco Dal Grande, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt Frederic H. Martini, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Hanolulu, Hawaii. Editorial Board George Mathew, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, India Subject Editors 2015–2017 Gernot Vogel, Heidelberg, Germany Aaron Bauer, Villanova University, Villanova, USA Giovanni Amori, CNR - Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Rome, Italy Amazonas Chagas Júnior, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brasil Gombobaatar Sundev, Professor of Ornithology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Anders G.J. Rhodin, Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg, USA G.P. Mandal, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India A. Biju Kumar, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India G.P. Sinha, Botanical Survey of India, Allahabad, India A.J. Solomon Raju, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India Hari Balasubramanian, EcoAdvisors, Nova Scotia, Canada A.J.T. Johnsingh, Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysuru, India Hayrünisa Baş Sermenli, Muğla University, Kötekli, Turkey Albert G. Orr, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia H.C. Nagaveni, Institute of Wood Science and Technology, Bengaluru, India Alessandre Pereira Colavite, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil H.C. Paulo Corgosinho, Bairro Universitário, Frutal, Brazil Alexi Popov, National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria H.N. Kumara, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, India Alexander Ereskovsky, IMBE, Marseille, France H. Raghuram, The American College, Madurai, India Andreas Köhler, Universidade de Santa Cruz do, Brazil Hector Barrios-Garrido, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia Angela R. Glatston, Rotterdam Zoo, The Netherlands Heidi S. Riddle, Riddle’s Elephant and Wildlife Sanctuary, Arkansas, USA Anjana Silva, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka Hem Sagar Baral, Charles Sturt University, NSW Australia Ankita Gupta, ICAR-NBAIR, Bengaluru, India Hemant V. Ghate, Modern College, Pune, India Annemarie Ohler, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France Heok Hee Ng, National University of Singapore, Science Drive, Singapore Ansie Dippenaar-Schoeman, University of Pretoria, Queenswood, South Africa Himender Bharti, Punjabi University, Patiala, India Antonio D. Brescovit, Instituto Butantan, Brasil Hui Xiao, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chaoyang, China Antonio A. Mignucci-Giannoni, Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Ian J. Kitching, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, UK Anwaruddin Chowdhury, The Rhino Foundation for nature in North East India, Guwahati, India Ian Redmond, UNEP Convention on Migratory Species, Lansdown, UK Aparna Watve, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Osmanabad, India Indraneil Das, Sarawak, Malaysia Arthur Y.C. Chung, Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia Ivana Karanovic, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea Asheesh Shivam, Nehru Gram Bharti University, Allahabad, India J. Jerald Wilson, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Ashwin Naidu, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA J.W. Duckworth, IUCN SSC, Bath, UK B.C. Choudhury (Retd.), Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India. Jack Tordoff, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Arlington, USA B. Ravi Prasad Rao, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantpur, India Jan Zima, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Brno, Czech Republic B. Shivaraju, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India James M. Carpenter, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA B.S. Kholia, Botanical Survey of India, Gangtok, Sikkim, India James Young, Hong Kong Lepidopterists’ Society, Hong Kong Bolívar R. Garcete-Barrett, FACEN, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay Jean-Pierre Boudot, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France Brett C. Ratcliffe, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA Jeff McNeely, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Brian Fisher, California Academy of Sciences, USA Jesse Leland, Southern Cross University, New South Wales, Australia C. Raghunathan, Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Jill Pruetz, Iowa State University, Ames, USA Caption: Diverse! Colourful! Almost Magical! Beetles are all around us from C. Srinivasulu, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India Jim Sanderson, Small Wild Cat Conservation Foundation, Hartford, USA ancient cultures, art and entertainment to being considered pests, food, Carl Ferraris, Smithsonian Institution, Portland, USA Jodi L. Sedlock, Lawrence University, Appleton, USA medicine, biodiversity indicators and even inspiration for technologies. Carol Inskipp, Bishop Auckland Co., Durham, UK John C. Morse, Clemson University, Long Hall, Clemson, USA This pencil and pen sketch by Priyanka Iyer, Zoo Outreach Organization is to Cecília Kierulff, Victorville , California John Huber, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ontario, Canada. celebrate Beetles. Cecilia Volkmer Ribeiro, Porto Alegre, Brazil. John Noyes, Natural History Museum, London, UK Chris Bowden, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK John Veron, Coral Reef Foundation, Townsville, Australia continued on the back inside cover Caption: Owls are amazing animals that are severely threatened by superstitions. This pen illustration by Priyanka Iyer, Zoo Outreach Organisation, is to celebrate not only their beauty but also all other threatened species. Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2018 | 10(15): 12907–12915 Article Dietary preference and feeding patterns of the urban Rhesus Macaque Macaca mulatta (Mammalia: Primates: Cercopithecidae) in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary in India ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Ishita Ganguly 1 & Netrapal Singh Chauhan 2 OPEN ACCESS 1,2 Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University Campus, Sector 125, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303, India 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected] Abstract: We studied the feeding patterns and discrete spatio-temporal food habitsof16 groups of the urban Rhesus Macaque Macaca mulatta following their relocation in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary near Delhi, India. We observed that the macaques fed on 31 plant species, with Prosopis juliflora and P. cineraria appearing in most scans. We classified the food consumed by the species into six main categories the species and recorded the average time spent on each of these throughout the year. The maximum time was spent on supplementary feeding provided by the forest department
Recommended publications
  • List of State-Wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India
    List of State-wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India Andaman and Nicobar Islands Sr. No Name Category 1 Barren Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 2 Battimalve Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 3 Bluff Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 4 Bondoville Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 5 Buchaan Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 6 Campbell Bay National Park National Park 7 Cinque Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 8 Defense Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 9 East Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 10 East Tingling Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 11 Flat Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 12 Galathea National Park National Park 13 Interview Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 14 James Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 15 Kyd Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 16 Landfall Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 17 Lohabarrack Salt Water Crocodile Sanctuary Crocodile Sanctuary 18 Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park National Park 19 Middle Button Island National Park National Park 20 Mount Harriet National Park National Park 21 Narcondum Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 22 North Button Island National Park National Park 23 North Reef Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 24 Paget Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 25 Pitman Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 26 Point Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 27 Ranger Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    GAJBE : List of Butterfl ies.....observed in Bor Wildlife Sanctuary, Maharashtra ISSN 0375-1511509 Rec. zool. Surv. India : 114(Part-3) : 509-511, 2014 Short Communication LIST OF BUTTERFLIES (INSECTA : LEPIDOPTERA) OBSERVED IN BOR WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, MAHARASHTRA INTRODUCTION The Vidarbha region of Maharashtra has some Bor Wildlife Sanctuary is located in Wardha important conservation areas. Tiple (2011) has District in the state of Maharashtra. The Sanctuary listed the butterfl ies of Vidarbha region. Sharma covers an area of 121.1 km2, which includes the and Radhakrishnan (2005, 2006) have reported the drainage basin of the Bor Dam. The Sanctuary Lepidoptera of Pench National Park and Tadoba is located at a distance of around 60 km from Andhari Tiger Reserve, respectively. Chandrakar Nagpur city. It is situated in the Vidarbha region et al (2007) have studied the butterfl ies of Melghat of Maharashtra, which is characterized by mild region. winters and extremely hot summers. The Sanctuary has South Deccan Plateau dry deciduous forests. Currently no information is available regarding Many species of animals including major the butterfl ies of Bor Wildlife Sanctuary. During species such as the Bengal Tiger and the Indian the present study, 33 species of butterfl ies Leopard are found here. Among invertebrate fauna, belonging to 22 genera of 5 families of order butterfl ies are probably the most conspicuous. Lepidoptera, observed in and around Bor Wildlife They are mostly diurnal in habit and are well Sanctuary are reported. The study was carried admired for their striking colours and fl ight. Many out during the year 2013. The butterfl ies were species of butterfl ies play an important role in observed around road-side vegetation in the buffer nature by pollinating various species of plants and a few species are economically important as pests zone of the Sanctuary and were identifi ed using of cultivated plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhijit Preliminary Report of Reptilian 1541
    CASE REPORT ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(7): 2742-2744 A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF REPTILIAN MORTALITY ON ROAD DUE TO VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS NEAR KAZIRANGA NATIONAL PARK, ASSAM, INDIA Abhijit Das¹, M. Firoz Ahmed², Bibhuti P. Lahkar and Pranjit Sharma ¹ ²Division of Herpetology, Aaranyak, Sommonoy Path, Survey, Beltola, Guwahati, Assam 781028, India ¹Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT STUDY AREA We report road mortality of reptiles on a highway segment The study was carried out during May 2004 to September passing along the southern boundary of Kaziranga National 2004 on a 60km road segment of National Highway 37, passing Park, Assam, India. A total of 68 instances of road kills of 0 0 0 reptiles belonging to 21 species and seven families were recorded. adjacent to Kaziranga National Park (26 34'-26 46'N & 93 08'- There was a greater mortality among snakes compared to lizards. 93036'E) (KNP), Assam, India. The 7.5m wide paved road The arboreal reptiles were the most affected, the highest percent separates the southern side of Kaziranga National Park from being those that were diurnal followed by the nocturnal, Karbi Anglong Hills (KAH) and passes through tea gardens, crepuscular and both day and night active species. Possible human habitations, paddy fields, teak plantations besides forest explanations of such differences in mortality among reptile groups are discussed. It is feared that such kind of persistent habitats of KNP at Panbari, Haldibari, Kanchanjuri and loss can be detrimental to the local reptilian population. Ghorakati (Fig. 1). All these adjacent forest habitats are animal corridors and are frequently used by megamammals like KEYWORDS Elephants, Indian One-horned Rhinoceros, Water Buffalo, Assam, India, Kaziranga National Park, reptile, road kill Tiger, Leopard and Hog Deer during their to and fro movement between KNP and KAH.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Odonata in University Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 5, ISSUE 05, MAY 2016 ISSN 2277-8616 Diversity And Distribution Of Odonata In University Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesian Ameilia Zuliyanti Siregar, Darma Bakti Abstract: A total of nine stations randomly selected study sites around the University Sumatera Utara area conducted during a month (16 January 2016 until 16 February 2016) for identified of Odonata. Odonata are insect which function as bioindicator and conservation of an environment status in the area. The sampled were collected using a sweep net (400 μm mesh, 60 cm x 90 cm) with six times the swing starts at 0900 until 1200 noon hour and identified in the laboratory. Consist of two sub-orders, 4 families, 24 genera, 32 species and 156 individuals identified dragonfly. Orthetrum sabina, Pantala flavescens and Agriocnemis femina are the kinds of dragonflies dominant, while two types of Vestalis/Arethystira amoena and Tholymis aurora is found only in the Station 3. As much as 54% relative abundance of family Coenagrionidae dominated, followed by Libellulidae (35%), Gomphidae (8%) and the smallest recorded from family Calopterygidae (35). The calculation of the value of the index is done, includes diversity Shannon, eveness and varied of Jaccard index (H'=2.48-3.79, E=0.70-0.85, CJ=0.45 to 1.00). Based on the conservation status, calculated the percentage of attendance dragonfly, divided into four groups of species that are rare (6.28%), there are species (54.24%), many species (24.78%) and very many species (14.70%). This study shows diversity and distribution of Odonata can used as potential as predators and conservation status of ecosystem University of Sumatera Utara areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Baseline Studies for Thane Creek
    Conducting baseline studies for Thane Creek Project report submitted to Mangrove Cell, Maharashtra & GIZ, Mumbai Office. by Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON) Anaikatty (PO), Coimbatore - 641108, Tamil Nadu In collaboration with B.N. Bandodkar College of Science, Thane Conducting baseline studies for Thane Creek Project report submitted to Mangrove Cell, Maharashtra & GIZ, Mumbai Office. Project Investigator Dr. Goldin Quadros Co-Investigators Dr. P.A. Azeez, Dr. Mahendiran Mylswamy, Dr. Manchi Shirish S. In Collaboration With Prof. Dr. R.P. Athalye B.N. Bandodkar College of Science, Thane Research Team Mr. Siddhesh Bhave, Ms. Sonia Benjamin, Ms. Janice Vaz, Mr. Amol Tripathi, Mr. Prathamesh Gujarpadhaye Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON) Anaikatty (PO), Coimbatore - 641108, Tamil Nadu 2016 Acknowledgement Thane creek has been an ecosystem that has held our attention since the time we have known about its flamingos. When we were given the opportunity to conduct The baseline study for Thane creek” we felt blessed to learn more about this unique ecosystem the largest creek from asia. This study was possible due to Mr. N Vasudevan, IFS, CCF, Mangrove cell, Maharashtra whose vision for the mangrove habitats in Maharashtra has furthered the cause of conservation. Hence, we thank him for giving us this opportunity to be a part of his larger goal. The present study involved interactions with a number of research institutions, educational institutions, NGO’s and community, all of whom were cooperative in sharing information and helped us. Most important was the cooperation of librarians from all the institutions who went out of their way in our literature survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Life Sanctuaries in INDIA
    A M K RESOURCE WORLD GENERAL KNOWLEDGE www.amkresourceinfo.com Wild Life Sanctuaries in INDIA Wildlife Sanctuaries in India are 441 in number. They are a home to hundreds and thousands of various flora and fauna. A wide variety of species thrive in such Wildlife Sanctuaries. With the ever growing cement – jungle, it is of utmost importance to protect and conserve wildlife and give them their own, natural space to survive Wildlife Sanctuaries are established by IUCN category II protected areas. A wildlife sanctuary is a place of refuge where abused, injured, endangered animals live in peace and dignity. Senchal Game Sanctuary. Established in 1915 is the oldest of such sanctuaries in India. Chal Batohi, in Gujarat is the largest Wildlife Sanctuary in India. The conservative measures taken by the Indian Government for the conservation of Tigers was awarded by a 30% rise in the number of tigers in 2015. According to the Red Data Book of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), there are 47 critically endangered species in India. DO YOU KNOW? Wildlife sanctuaries in India are established by IUCN category II protected areas. India has 537 wildlife sanctuaries referred to as wildlife sanctuaries category IV protected areas. Among these, the 50 tiger reserves are governed by Project Tiger, and are of special significance in the conservation of the tiger. Some wildlife sanctuaries in India are specifically named bird sanctuary, e.g., Keoladeo National Park before attaining National Park status. Many of them being referred as as a particular animal such as Jawai leopard sanctuary in Rajasthan.
    [Show full text]
  • Uperodon Systoma) on the Pondicherry University Campus, Puducherry, India
    WWW.IRCF.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES &IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 27(2):245–246 • AUG 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES Opportunistic. Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: Nocturnal Predation On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 by a. TheDiurnal Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus Snake: grenadensis) and Humans An on Grenada: Indian Ratsnake, A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 PtyasRESEARCH mucosa ARTICLES (Linnaeus 1758), Preying on . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida Marbled ............................................. BalloonBrian J. Camposano, Frogs Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin ( M.Uperodon Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatoskysystoma 212 ) CONSERVATIONAvrajjal ALERT Ghosh1,2, Shweta Madgulkar2, and Krishnendu Banerjee2,3 . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 1 School of Biological. More Sciences, Than Mammals National ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANDJUS, L. & Z.ADAMOV1C, 1986. IS&Zle I Ogrozene Vrste Odonata U Siroj Okolin
    OdonatologicalAbstracts 1985 NIKOLOVA & I.J. JANEVA, 1987. Tendencii v izmeneniyata na hidrobiologichnoto s’soyanie na (12331) KUGLER, J., [Ed.], 1985. Plants and animals porechieto rusenski Lom. — Tendencies in the changes Lom of the land ofIsrael: an illustrated encyclopedia, Vol. ofthe hydrobiological state of the Rusenski river 3: Insects. Ministry Defence & Soc. Prol. Nat. Israel. valley. Hidmbiologiya, Sofia 31: 65-82. (Bulg,, with 446 col. incl. ISBN 965-05-0076-6. & Russ. — Zool., Acad. Sei., pp., pis (Hebrew, Engl. s’s). (Inst. Bulg. with Engl, title & taxonomic nomenclature). Blvd Tzar Osvoboditel 1, BG-1000 Sofia). The with 48-56. Some Lists 7 odon. — Lorn R. Bul- Odon. are dealt on pp. repre- spp.; Rusenski valley, sentative described, but checklist is spp. are no pro- garia. vided. 1988 1986 (12335) KOGNITZKI, S„ 1988, Die Libellenfauna des (12332) ANDJUS, L. & Z.ADAMOV1C, 1986. IS&zle Landeskreises Erlangen-Höchstadt: Biotope, i okolini — SchrReihe ogrozene vrste Odonata u Siroj Beograda. Gefährdung, Förderungsmassnahmen. [Extinct and vulnerable Odonata species in the broader bayer. Landesaml Umweltschutz 79: 75-82. - vicinity ofBelgrade]. Sadr. Ref. 16 Skup. Ent. Jugosl, (Betzensteiner Str. 8, D-90411 Nürnberg). 16 — Hist. 41 recorded 53 localities in the VriSac, p. [abstract only]. (Serb.). (Nat. spp. were (1986) at Mus., Njegoseva 51, YU-11000 Beograd, Serbia). district, Bavaria, Germany. The fauna and the status of 27 recorded in the discussed, and During 1949-1950, spp. were area. single spp. are management measures 3 decades later, 12 spp. were not any more sighted; are suggested. they became either locally extinct or extremely rare. A list is not provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D
    International Dragonfly Fund - Report 26 (2010): 1-36 1 The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: taxonomy and distribution. Progress Report for 2009 surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D student at the Department of Entomology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Email: [email protected] Introduction Three families in the superfamily Calopterygoidea occur in China, viz. the Calo- pterygidae, Chlorocyphidae and Euphaeidae. They include numerous species that are distributed widely across South China, mainly in streams and upland running waters at moderate altitudes. To date, our knowledge of Chinese spe- cies has remained inadequate: the taxonomy of some genera is unresolved and no attempt has been made to map the distribution of the various species and genera. This project is therefore aimed at providing taxonomic (including on larval morphology), biological, and distributional information on the super- family in South China. In 2009, two series of surveys were conducted to Southwest China-Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces. The two provinces are characterized by karst limestone arranged in steep hills and intermontane basins. The climate is warm and the weather is frequently cloudy and rainy all year. This area is usually regarded as one of biodiversity “hotspot” in China (Xu & Wilkes, 2004). Many interesting species are recorded, the checklist and photos of these sur- veys are reported here. And the progress of the research on the superfamily Calopterygoidea is appended. Methods Odonata were recorded by the specimens collected and identified from pho- tographs. The working team includes only four people, the surveys to South- west China were completed by the author and the photographer, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Check List of Odonates from Calicut University Campus, Calicut, Kerala, South India
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2015; 3 (2): 260-263 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 A preliminary check list of Odonates from Calicut JEZS 2015; 3 (2): 260-263 university campus, Calicut, Kerala, South India © 2015 JEZS Received: 20-02-2015 Accepted: 04-03-2015 Jisha Krishnan E. K, Sebastian C. D. Jisha Krishnan E. K Abstract Molecular Biology Laboratory, Dragonflies and damselflies, collectively called odonates, are one of the most common insects flying Department of Zoology, over forest, fields, meadows, ponds and rivers. Approximately 6500 extant species in over 600 genera University of Calicut, Kerala, and 28 families are known all over the world. About 474 species in 142 genera and 18 families are 673 635 India. identified from India, out of which 154 species are from Kerala. Here we developed a preliminary Sebastian C. D. checklist of Odonata populations found in Calicut University Campus. The study revealed 27 species Department of Zoology, coming under 4 families and 21 genera. Suborder Anisoptera (dragonflies) were represented by the University of Calicut, Kerala, family Libellulidae, Aeshnidae and Gomphidae while the suborder Zygoptera by the family 673 635 India. Coenagrionidae. The two dominant familes of Odonates – Libellulidae and Coenagrionidae – were found to exist in all habitats under the study. Keywords: Odonata, Calicut University Camps, checklist 1. Introduction Odonata are a striking aquatic and aerial component of environment in terms of both biomass and their influence as predators [1]. These attributes have prompted studies of odonate life histories, behavior, and diet [2]. The fossil record of these species dates back to carboniferous period over 350 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Holistic Survey on Damselfly (Anisoptera : Odonata)Diversity in Rice Ecosystem of Eastern India
    International Research Journal of Natural Sciences Vol.4, No.4, pp.19-34, December 2016 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) HOLISTIC SURVEY ON DAMSELFLY (ANISOPTERA : ODONATA)DIVERSITY IN RICE ECOSYSTEM OF EASTERN INDIA C.R. Satpathi and A. Mondal Department of Agricultural Entomology Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya( State agricultural University), P.O- Mohanpur, Dist. – Nadia, West Bengal -741252, India ABSTRACT: This study highlights the richness of Damselfly (Anisoptera: Odonata) fauna associated with rice ecosystems in Eastern India.. Sampling of the Damselfly community was conducted during 2010-14 to determine species composition, abundance and distribution in 3 different habitats of rice fields which were selected at 60 m (Chakdaha), 600 m (Cooch Behar) and 1250 m (Kalimpong) respectively. Each location was surveyed at a biweekly interval after transplanting of rice plants and about 10 species of Damselfly were recorded as insect predators in rice crops of Eastern India. General morphology, biology, ecology, behavior of the Damselfly are being highlighted in the present investigation. After comparing different body parts, double branching keys are prepared for their easy identification. The studies of their diversity showed that maximum and minimum value of both Simpson and Shannon-Weiner index were at the flowering and the vegetative stage of crop respectively. The value of Margalef index and Menhinck index also indicated that the highest value in reproductive stage of rice crop. The studies on Evenness index designated that the value of E1, E2 and E3 were influenced by species richness and not evenness. Consequently the influence of fertilizer on the incidence of Damselfly in rice ecosystem showed that there was a remarkable increase of population where high doses of nitrogen (120 kg/ha) were applied followed by the use of mix fertilizer(120:60:60 N:P:K).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 02:27:59AM Via Free Access T  E,  147, 2004
    1 2 FER WILLEMSE & SIGFRID INGRISCH 1 Eygelshoven, The Netherlands 2 Bad Karlshafen, Germany A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ACRIDIDAE FROM SOUTH INDIA (ORTHOPTERA, ACRIDOIDEA) Willemse, F. & S. Ingrisch 2004. A new genus and species of Acrididae from South India (Or- thoptera, Acridoidea). – Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 147: 191-196, figs. 1-22. [ISSN 0040- 7496]. Published 1 December 2004. Nathanacris quadrimaculata gen. et sp. n. is described from Anaimalai Hills in South India. The systematic position of this acridid genus is not yet clear. For the time being we propose to arrange the genus under the unclassified group of Catantopinae sensu lato. Dr. Fer Willemse (corresponding author), Laurastraat 67, Eygelshoven 6471 JH, The Nether- lands. E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Sigfrid Ingrisch, Eichendorffweg 4, D-34385 Bad Karlshafen, Germany. E-mail: sigfrid.in- [email protected] Key words. – Orthoptera, Acrididae, Catantopinae (s.l.), South India. Major contributions to the Acrididae fauna of than wide, in female a little shorter than wide, in male South India were provided by Bolívar (1902), Hebard lateral margins almost parallel and converging towards (1929), Uvarov (1929), Henry (1940), Muralirangan widely rounded apex, in female lateral margins short et al. (1992) and Shrinivasan & Muralirangan (1992). and apical margin semicircular (figs. 2, 7); in lateral Nevertheless our knowledge of the grasshopper fauna view tip angularly merging with frons, foveolae obso- of south India is still insufficient, particularly of lete or scarcely recognisable as elongate triangular fur- species living in natural habitats and commonly dis- rows. Frontal ridge projecting slightly between anten- tributed over small areas.
    [Show full text]