DOCSLIB.ORG

Replace This with the Actual Title Using All Caps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Replace This with the Actual Title Using All Caps AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRESERVATION PLANS IN THE HISTORIC CORE OF ANKARA, TURKEY A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Sena Kayasu May 2018 © 2018 Sena Kayasu ABSTRACT Ankara has been the capital of Turkey since 1923, but the city’s history goes back millennia. Over the last century, the historic city center, Ulus, has suffered the impacts of rapid urban development. The area has not had a functional preservation strategy since 2005. Today, large numbers of Ankara’s historic structures undergo significant alteration or even demolition to accommodate new development. This thesis surveys Ulus’ history, then focuses on the last 30 years to determine what happened. It is a first attempt at understanding how to design and implement a new strategy for Ulus that will preserve its historic cultural resources while accommodating the pressures of a rapidly expanding city. It finds that the lack of communication between various stakeholders has caused resistance to any possible strategies. Creating a viable master plan for Ulus will involve significant legal and administrative alterations to the preservation canon. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Sena Kayasü was born and raised in Ankara, Turkey and graduated from Bilkent Laboratory and International School with an IB Diploma in 2011. Following high school, Sena earned a Bachelor of Architecture degree from Bilkent University in Ankara. Between 2013 and 2016, she served on the board of the Design and Architecture Society of the same university. Sena interned at Mesa Construction in the summer of 2014, then A Architectural Design and the Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations in the summer of 2015. In August 2016, Sena relocated to Ithaca, New York to pursue a Master’s Degree in Historic Preservation Planning at Cornell University. While at Cornell, she served on the board of Preservation Studies Student Organization. In the summer of 2016, Sena was a Joseph P. Keithley Fellow at Cleveland Restoration Society, a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the historic built fabric of northeast Ohio. Sena will graduate from Cornell University’s College of Architecture, Art, and Planning with a Master of Arts in Historic Preservation Planning on May 27th, 2018. iii To my city, Ankara, for its endurance over the centuries. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support of so many people. I am deeply grateful for Jeffrey Chusid and Michael Tomlan for their continuous guidance not only while I wrote this thesis, but also for the past two years. I am eternally indebted to my family, who stood behind me no matter what: to my parents who consoled me through Skype while my mind exploded, to my brother and sister- in-law who never doubted me, and to my aunts, uncles, cousins, and grandparents who supported my every decision. I could not have finished this thesis, or the program, without the support and compassion of my HPP family. Every time I thought I was alone, I realized someone nearby shared my pain, my joy, or my surprise. I thank the Historic Preservation Planning Alumni, who provided financial support in the form of the Barclay Jones Grant. I would like to thank my friends for giving me a place in their lives and making me laugh. Among others, Melis Atalar and Derin Akşit offered me a home-away-from-home whenever I needed a break from Ithaca, my friends in Ankara were my eyes and ears on the ground, and Alp Giray Köse never left me wanting for a document. Finally, special thanks to Furkan Akdemir who was unwavering in emotional and technical support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................... III DEDICATION. .................................................................................................................................. IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. V TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ VIII LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... IX LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................................ X LIST OF MAPS ................................................................................................................................. XI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... XII KEY WORDS AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................... XIII INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. THE STORY OF ANKARA .................................................................................................... 13 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Ankara Before 1923 .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.1. Ankara’s Early Inhabitants ..................................................................................................... 13 1.1.2. Ankara as a Roman Province.................................................................................................. 17 1.1.3. Turks Enter Anatolia .............................................................................................................. 20 1.1.4. Ankara Becomes an Ottoman Province .................................................................................. 23 1.2. The Capital City of the Turkish Republic................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.1. 1923-1950 ............................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.2. 1950-1980 ............................................................................................................................... 42 1.2.3. 1980-2001 ............................................................................................................................... 54 1.2.4. After 2001............................................................................................................................... 56 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................... 57 2. THE HISTORY OF THE PRESERVATION FRAMEWORK IN TURKEY ................... 59 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 59 2.1. Before 1920: The Preservation Legacy of the Ottoman Empire ............................................................. 60 2.2. 1920 – 1972: Preservation in the Young Republic ............................................................................................. 62 2.3. 1973 – 2002: World Heritage and Shifts in the International Political Paradigm .................. 65 2.4. 2003 – Present ................................................................................................................................................................................. 70 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................... 76 3. THE 1986 ULUS PLAN ........................................................................................................... 79 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 79 3.1. The Beginning of the 1986 Ulus Plan ........................................................................................................................... 79 Strategy 1: A New CBD in Kazıkiçi Bostanları ................................................................................................................... 86 Strategy 2: Site Survey ............................................................................................................................................................................ 88 Strategy 3: Urban Design ..................................................................................................................................................................... 91 Strategy 4: Ownership ............................................................................................................................................................................. 92 3.2. Strengths of the Ulus Plan .............................................................................................................................. 96 3.3. Issues Related to the Ulus Plan ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universidade Federal Da Bahia Faculdade De Arquitetura Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Arquitetura E Urbanismo
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA FACULDADE DE ARQUITETURA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Salvador 2013 iii UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA FACULDADE DE ARQUITETURA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade Federal da Bahia – UFBA, como pré-requisito para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Área de concentração: Conservação e Restauro. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo. Salvador 2013 Faculdade de Arquitetura da UFBA - Biblioteca C236 Caparó, Erwic Flores. Preservação, desenvolvimento e políticas públicas no caso de Cusco-Perú (1950-1990) / Erwic Flores Caparó. 2013. 280 f. : il. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal da Bahia, Faculdade de Arquitetura, 2013. 1. Planejamento urbano - Política pública - Patrimônio - Cusco (Peru). 2. Arquitetura - Conservação e restauração - Cusco (Peru). I. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Arquitetura. II. Azevedo, Paulo Ormindo David de. III. Título. CDU: 72.025(853.19) v ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Banca Examinadora Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo - Orientador Doutor em Arquitetura e Urbanismo – Università di
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 6(1); April 2014 The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914 Devrim Ümit PhD Assistant Professor Founding and Former Chair Department of International Relations Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Karabuk University Turkey Abstract American missionaries have long been the missing link in the study of the late Ottoman period despite the fact that they left their permanent trade in American as well as Western conceptions of the period such as “Terrible Turk” and “Red Sultan” just to name a few. From the landing of the first two American Protestant missionaries, Levi Parsons and Pliny Fisk, on the Ottoman Empire, as a matter of fact on the Near East, in early 1820, until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, American missionaries occupied the increasing attention of the Ottoman bureaucracy in domestic and foreign affairs while the mission work in the Ottoman Empire established the largest investment of the American Board of Commissionaries for Foreign Missions (A.B.C.F.M.) in the world, even above China and India, on the eve of the war. The bulk of the correspondence of the Ottoman Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the period was with the United States and this was chiefly concerned about the American mission schools. Therefore, this paper seeks to examine the encounter between the Ottoman officialdom and the American Protestant missionaries in Ottoman Turkey during the successive regimes of Sultan Abdülhamid II and the Committee of Union and Progress, the Unionists in the period of 1876-1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned by Scan2net
    Ulud. Uniu. Zir. Fak. Derg. , (1986) 5: 19-26 GENERAL ASPECT OF HORTICULTURE IN BURSA Atilla ERİŞ* Vedat ŞEN1Z * * Arif SOYLU*** SUM MARY Bursa has a special place in Turkey from the horticultural point of uiew. Fruit species such as oliue, peach, grcıp e , apple, plum, pear, cherry, walnut, chest­ niıt, fig, strawberry and quince and almost all summer and w in ter uegetable specieı that haue important additiues to total production of Turkey are grown in this uicinity extensiuely. Vegetable species such as tomato, bean, pepper and pea whiciı especially processedin industry, and o nion are produced much than others. In this study, current aspect of horticulture in Bursa prouince was identi{ied; and its economic dimensions and technical problems were explained. ÖZET bursa 'da Bahçe Bitkileri Tanınının Genel Durumu Bahçe bitkileri yetiştiriciliğ i açısından Bursa 'nın Türkiye 'de özel bir yeri uar­ dır. Yörede Türkiye toplam üretimine önemli katkıları olan zeytin, şeftali, üzüm, elmd, erik, armut, kiraz, ceuiz, k eıtan e , incir, çilek ue ayua gibi meyue türleri ile he­ men hemen tüm yazlık ue kışlık sebze türleri çok yaygın olarak yetiştirilmektedir. Sebzelerden bilha11a sanayide çok iş lene n domates, fasulye, biber, bezelye gibi türler ile soğan · diğ erlerinde n daha da fazla üretilmektedir. Bu çalış mada bahçe bitkilerinin Bursa y ö reıind eki m eucut durumu tan ı tıl ­ mış , ekonomik boyutları ue belirlenen sorunları açıklanmı ş tır. INTRODUCTION It is seldom to find regions which are suitable to horticulture at various alti­ tutes from sea level up to 2.000 m in the world. Bursa has an important place among these regions having about 1.104.301 ha agricultural area according to the recent statistics (Anonymous 1983 c).
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Protective Zoning Bylaw
    VI. Protective Zoning Bylaw Town of Ipswich Massachusetts May 7, 1977 (As Amended through October, 2020) Table of Contents I. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 5 II. APPLICABILITY .................................................................................................................... 6 A. General ................................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Nonconforming Uses and Structures ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Municipal Construction Projects ............................................................................................................ 8 III. DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 9 IV. ZONING DISTRICTS ........................................................................................................... 20 A. Type of Districts ................................................................................................................................... 20 B. Intent of Districts .................................................................................................................................. 20 C. District Boundaries ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/26/2021 07:23:45AM Via Free Access
    Chapter 5 Tales of Viziers and Wine: Interpreting Early Ottoman Narratives of State Centralization Dimitri Kastritsis The dominant paradigm of Ottoman state-building is one of progressive cen- tralization and institutionalization, from the late fourteenth to the mid- sixteenth century ce. This paradigm was first developed by Paul Wittek in the 1930s, and later refined by Halil İnalcık and others.1 According to Wittek’s well- known thesis, the Ottoman state-building venture was at first an egalitarian affair. Frontiersmen with a more or less tribal and nomadic background, pos- sessing a deep religious devotion embodied by holy men, carried out religious- ly motivated raids (ġazā) into Christian territory. By means of such activity, they were able to push the frontiers of Islam from the Anatolian borders of Byzantium to the Danube and Adriatic. But as the borders of their principality grew and its frontier advanced into Europe, a hinterland developed, in which the need for central state institutions became apparent. Such institutions were modelled on those already present in other Islamic states. They included shariʿa courts, taxation based on population surveys, and employment of slaves in the army and state administration. Since at first the Ottoman princi- pality consisted of territory newly conquered for Islam, in order to build such institutions, there was a need for scholars (ulema, Ar. ʿulamāʾ) imported from outside the Ottoman borders. Members of this new class (distinct from the holy men already mentioned) entered the Ottoman domains from rival Mus- lim principalities to the east. At first they mainly came from the neighboring Turkish emirates (beyliks) of Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Empire Earth TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Installation...............................................................................................5 Installing Empire Earth ..........................................................................................................5 Tips to Improve Game Performance ......................................................................................6 Prehistoric (500,000 – 50,000 BC) ............................................................................8 Chapter II: What is Empire Earth? ......................................................................10 The Emergence of Empires ..................................................................................................10 Your Role in Empire Earth...............................................................................................11 Features of Empire Earth......................................................................................................12 Stone Age (50,000 – 5,000 BC)................................................................................14 Chapter III: Starting Empire Earth ......................................................................16 Launching the Game ............................................................................................................16 Main Menu ...........................................................................................................................16 Learning to Play ...................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Twenty-Six
    Chapter Twenty-six Religion and Religiosity after the Crusades The First Crusade was a great turning-point for western Christendom. An obvious consequence of the First Crusade was that many Catholics became aware that their lot in this earthly life left much to be desired: in Orthodox Christendom and in the Dar al-Islam people were better off than they were in Catholic Europe. This recognition led to material and economic improvements in western Europe and to a new kind of education, which in turn was followed by humanism and the Renaissance. By 1500 western Europe was a very different place than it had been four hundred years earlier, and considerably closer to modernity. This secular improvement will be the subject of the next chapter, but in this chapter we must take a close look at the religious upheaval with which it began. Militancy against Muslims was paralleled at home by a heightened religiosity. Ordinary Christians, who had long assumed that they would reach Heaven by following the lead of the Church and its clerical hierarchy, began taking upon themselves the responsibility for their souls‟ salvation. Thousands of Christians enlisted in new and demanding monastic orders, and thousands more left the Catholic church to join communities of devout but renegade Christians. Another aspect of the Christians‟ new religiosity was violence against the small Jewish communities in their midst, which until then had enjoyed relative security. Judaism was also infused with a new religious enthusiasm, as the mystical texts known as the Kabbalah made their appearance and quickly took their place alongside the Tanakh and the Talmud.
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul Bibliyografyasi
    İSTANBUL BİBLİYOGRAFYASI CEMAL TOKSOY* - YUNUS UĞUR** Bu çalışma, kitap ve doktora tezi formatındaki eserler Bibliyografya hazırlanırken taraması yapılan katalog merkeze alınarak yaklaşık 3.700 çalışmayı muhtevi ve Veri Tabanları şunlardır: TDV İSAM Kütüphanesi, bir listedir. İstanbul ile ilgili yapılmış tüm yayınları Milli Kütüphane, Kültür Bakanlığı Kütüphaneler Ortak kapsama iddiasında değildir. Aşağıda belirtilen kataloglar Veritabanı, Atatürk Kitaplığı, İstanbul Kitaplığı, taranarak İstanbul şehrinin tarihi ile doğrudan ilgili European Library, Library of Congress, olan çalışmalara yer verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Eserler Bibliotheque National, British Library, National listelenirken kitap ve tez ayırımı yapılmadan yazarların Library of Greece, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, ve yayına hazırlayan kişilerin soyadları dikkate alınarak Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi, İstanbul alfabetik sıralama yapılmıştır. Herhangi bir yazar- Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi hazırlayan ismi belirtilmeyen çalışmalar ise listenin Kütüphanesi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi sonunda kitap başlıklarına göre alfabetik sıralanmıştır. Kütüphanesi, Marmara Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi, Tekrarlardan kaçınmak için birkaç dilde yayınlanmış Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi çalışmalardan telif yani özgün dili tercih edilmiş, Kütüphanesi, YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi, Citation birkaç kere basımı yapılan yayınların ise ilk baskısı Index, ProQuest Dissertation, Archive.org, DART-Europe bibliyografyaya dahil edilmiştir. E-theses Portal ve http://www.envanter.gov.tr.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh First Published November 2011, Updated to October 2016
    Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh first published November 2011, updated to October 2016 Summary Saint Jerome’s AD 386 remark that the language of ancient Galatia (around modern Ankara) resembled the language of the Treveri (around modern Trier) has been misinterpreted. The “Celts”, “Gauls” or “Galatians” mentioned by classical authors, including those who invaded Greece and Anatolia around 277 BC, were not Celtic in the modern sense of speaking a Celtic language related to Welsh and Irish, but tall, pale-skinned, hairy, warrior peoples from the north. The 150 or so words and proper names currently known from Galatian speech show little affinity with Celtic but more with Germanic. Introduction In AD 386 Saint Jerome wrote: Apart from the Greek language, which is spoken throughout the entire East, the Galatians have their own language, almost the same as the Treveri. For many people this short remark is the linchpin of a belief that ancient Celtic speech spread far outside its Atlantic-fringe homeland, reaching even into the heart of Anatolia, modern Turkey. However, we wish to challenge the idea that Galatians spoke a language that was Celtic in the modern sense of being closely related to Welsh or Irish. Galatia was the region around ancient Ancyra, modern Ankara, in the middle of Turkey. Anatolia (otherwise known as Asia Minor) has seen many civilisations come and go over the millennia. Around 8000 BC it was a cradle of agriculture and the Neolithic revolution. The whole family of Indo-European languages originated somewhere in that region. We favour the idea that they grew up around the Black Sea all the way from northern Anatolia, past the mouth of the river Danube, to southern Russia and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]