DOCSLIB.ORG

VI. Protective Zoning Bylaw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VI. Protective Zoning Bylaw VI. Protective Zoning Bylaw Town of Ipswich Massachusetts May 7, 1977 (As Amended through October, 2020) Table of Contents I. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 5 II. APPLICABILITY .................................................................................................................... 6 A. General ................................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Nonconforming Uses and Structures ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Municipal Construction Projects ............................................................................................................ 8 III. DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 9 IV. ZONING DISTRICTS ........................................................................................................... 20 A. Type of Districts ................................................................................................................................... 20 B. Intent of Districts .................................................................................................................................. 20 C. District Boundaries ............................................................................................................................... 21 V. USE REGULATIONS ........................................................................................................... 23 A. Applicability of Use Regulations ......................................................................................................... 23 B. Permitted Uses ...................................................................................................................................... 23 C. Uses Subject to Other Regulations ....................................................................................................... 23 D. Table of Use Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 23 TABLE OF USE REGULATIONS .............................................................................................................. 24 FOOTNOTES TO USE REGULATIONS ................................................................................................... 30 E. Lots Situated in More Than One District ............................................................................................. 34 VI. DIMENSIONAL AND DENSITY REGULATIONS ...................................................................... 35 A. Applicability of Dimensional and Density Regulations ....................................................................... 35 B. Table of Dimensional and Density Regulations ................................................................................... 35 C. Determination of Lot Areas .................................................................................................................. 35 D. Separation of Lots ................................................................................................................................ 35 E. Screening Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 35 F. Requirements for Accessory Buildings and Structures ........................................................................ 36 G. Other General Dimensional and Density Requirements ....................................................................... 37 H. Lots Situated in More Than One District ............................................................................................. 38 I. Frontage Exception for Larger Lots ..................................................................................................... 38 TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL AND DENSITY REGULATIONS .............................................................. 39 FOOTNOTES TO TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL AND DENSITY REGULATIONS ............................... 42 VII. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS .......................................................... 47 A. Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 47 B. Parking Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 47 TABLE OF MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS............................................................................. 47 C. Change of Use or Building Expansions ................................................................................................ 50 D. Accessory Use of Parking Areas .......................................................................................................... 50 E. Joint Use of Parking Areas ................................................................................................................... 50 F. Fractional Numbers .............................................................................................................................. 50 G. Mixed Use Facilities ............................................................................................................................. 51 H. Location of Parking Facilities .............................................................................................................. 51 I. Municipal Parking Lot Exemption ....................................................................................................... 51 J. Loading Requirements ......................................................................................................................... 51 K. Design Standards for Parking Facilities ............................................................................................... 52 L. Loading Space Dimensions .................................................................................................................. 52 M. Parking and Loading Layout ................................................................................................................ 53 N. Handicapped Parking ........................................................................................................................... 53 O. Electric Vehicle Charging .................................................................................................................... 53 Page 2 Ipswich Zoning Bylaw, updated STM October 17, 2020 P. Surfacing, Drainage and Curbing ........................................................................................................ 53 Q. Landscaping ......................................................................................................................................... 54 R. Lighting................................................................................................................................................ 54 S. Maintenance ......................................................................................................................................... 54 VIII. SIGNS ................................................................................................................................ 55 A. Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 55 B. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 55 C. Sign Standards and Requirements ....................................................................................................... 56 D. Sign Allowances Based on Type and District...................................................................................... 58 E. Sign Allowances for Institutional Uses ............................................................................................... 58 F. Sign Permitting .................................................................................................................................... 58 G. Exempt Signs ....................................................................................................................................... 59 H. Prohibited Signs ................................................................................................................................... 59 I. Special Permits .................................................................................................................................... 59 J. Nonconformance of Signs ................................................................................................................... 60 IX. SPECIAL REGULATIONS ..................................................................................................... 63 A. Open Space Preservation (Cluster) Zoning (OSPZ) ............................................................................ 63 B. Wetlands District ................................................................................................................................. 69 C. Water Supply Protection Districts ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universidade Federal Da Bahia Faculdade De Arquitetura Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Arquitetura E Urbanismo
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA FACULDADE DE ARQUITETURA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Salvador 2013 iii UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA FACULDADE DE ARQUITETURA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade Federal da Bahia – UFBA, como pré-requisito para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Área de concentração: Conservação e Restauro. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo. Salvador 2013 Faculdade de Arquitetura da UFBA - Biblioteca C236 Caparó, Erwic Flores. Preservação, desenvolvimento e políticas públicas no caso de Cusco-Perú (1950-1990) / Erwic Flores Caparó. 2013. 280 f. : il. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal da Bahia, Faculdade de Arquitetura, 2013. 1. Planejamento urbano - Política pública - Patrimônio - Cusco (Peru). 2. Arquitetura - Conservação e restauração - Cusco (Peru). I. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Arquitetura. II. Azevedo, Paulo Ormindo David de. III. Título. CDU: 72.025(853.19) v ERWIC FLORES CAPARÓ PRESERVAÇÃO, DESENVOLVIMENTO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS NO CASO DE CUSCO-PERU (1950-1990) Banca Examinadora Paulo Ormindo David de Azevedo - Orientador Doutor em Arquitetura e Urbanismo – Università di
    [Show full text]
  • VIENNA Gets High Marks
    city, transformed Why VIENNA gets high marks Dr. Eugen Antalovsky Jana Löw years city, transformed VIENNA 1 Why VIENNA gets high marks Dr. Eugen Antalovsky Jana Löw Why Vienna gets high marks © European Investment Bank, 2019. All rights reserved. All questions on rights and licensing should be addressed to [email protected] The findings, interpretations and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Investment Bank. Get our e-newsletter at www.eib.org/sign-up pdf: QH-06-18-217-EN-N ISBN 978-92-861-3870-6 doi:10.2867/9448 eBook: QH-06-18-217-EN-E ISBN 978-92-861-3874-4 doi:10.2867/28061 4 city, transformed VIENNA Austria’s capital transformed from a peripheral, declining outpost of the Cold War to a city that consistently ranks top of global quality of life surveys. Here’s how Vienna turned a series of major economic and geopolitical challenges to its advantage. Introduction In the mid-1980s, when Vienna presented its first urban development plan, the city government expected the population to decline and foresaw serious challenges for its urban economy. However, geopolitical transformations prompted a fresh wave of immigration to Vienna, so the city needed to adapt fast and develop new initiatives. A new spirit of urban development emerged. Vienna’s remarkable migration-driven growth took place in three phases: • first, the population grew rapidly between 1989 and 1993 • then it grew again between 2000 and 2006 • and finally from 2010 until today the population has been growing steadily and swiftly, by on average around 22,000 people per year • This means an addition of nearly 350,000 inhabitants since 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element
    Chapter IX LAND USE ELEMENT INTRODUCTION The land use element, together with the agricultural, natural, and cultural resources element, seeks to balance long term growth and development in the County with the environmental well-being, agricultural activities, and cultural history of the County. The land use element sets forth major objectives concerning the desirable physical development of Racine County and its communities. Arguably the most important element of the comprehensive plan, the land use plan provides a means of relating day-to-day development decisions to long-range development objectives and provides for an efficient and attractive development pattern and serves to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. The land use element is one of the nine elements of a comprehensive plan required by Section 66.1001 of the Wisconsin Statutes. Section 66.1001 (2) (h) of the Statutes requires this element to compile goals, objectives, policies, programs, and maps to guide future development and redevelopment of public and private property. The Statutes also require an analysis of data and maps regarding existing land use, land use trends, and land use projections to develop land use goals, objectives, policies, and programs for the County including: Information regarding the amount, type, and intensity or density of existing land uses in the County. Land use trends in the County. Projected land use needs in five year increments to the plan design year 2035. Maps showing existing and future land uses, productive agricultural soils, natural limitations to building site development, floodplains, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive lands.1 In addition, the following comprehensive planning goals related to the land use element are set forth in Section 16.965 of the Statutes and must be addressed as part of the planning process:2 Promotion of the redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and public services and the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing residential, commercial, and industrial structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Development Strategy a Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
    Saint Paul Downtown Development Strategy A Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Approved by Saint Paul Planning Commission February 14, 2003 Adopted by Saint Paul City Council March 26, 2003 Approved by Metropolitan Council September 17, 2003 Amended by Saint Paul City Council September 21, 2005 Acknowledgments Downtown Development Strategy Task Force CapitolRiver Council Paul Mandell, Community Co-Chair Mary Nelson, Community Organizer Brian Alton, Planning Commission Co-Chair Bill Buth, Building Owners and Managers Association City of Saint Paul Jason Medvec, Downtown Business Owner Betsy Bockstruck, Downtown Business Owner Martha Faust, Department of Planning and Economic Development Roger Nielson, Downtown Business Owner Lucy Thompson, Department of Planning and Economic Development Marla Gamble, Saint Paul Art Collective Allen Lovejoy, Department of Planning and Economic Development Tom Getzke, Saint Paul Convention and Visitors’ Bureau Al Carlson, Department of Planning and Economic Development Weiming Lu, Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation Jeff Nelson, Department of Planning and Economic Development Reverend Bill Englund, First Baptist Church Tim Agness, Division of Parks and Recreation Linda Lee, Downtown Resident Don Ganje, Division of Parks and Recreation Larry Englund, Downtown Resident John Wirka, Division of Parks and Recreation Mike Fitzgerald, Downtown Resident Mike Klassen, Department of Public Works Elaine Wray, Downtown Resident Joan Chinn, Department of Public Works Betty Herbert, Downtown Resident Mark Basten, Department
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Spirit of Our Places: a View on Our Built Environment
    UCLA UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy Title Saving the Spirit of Our Places: A View on Our Built Environment Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2568v8rn Journal UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 15(1) Author Nivala, John Publication Date 1996 DOI 10.5070/L5151018919 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Saving the Spirit of Our Places: A View on Our Built Environment John Nivala* INTRODUCTION The places where we work and live have a spirit, a spirit that enlivens our present by reminding us of our past and anticipating our future. The ancients called this spirit the genius loci, a "clus- ter of associations identified with a place: pervading spirit."' It is the "distinctive character or atmosphere of a place with refer- ence to the impression that it makes on the mind."12 In our built environment, the genius loci is the power of the structures 3 around us to create these associations, to make that impression. What should we expect of our built environment? 4 It should offer us order and variety, stability and progress, the old and the new, working together to create an external environment which • Associate Professor, Widener University Law School. B.A., Hope College; J.D., University of Michigan Law School; L.L.M., Temple University Law School. 1. WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LAN- GUAGE (Unabridged, 1986). 2. RANDOM HOUSE DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (2d ed. una- bridged, 1987). 1 3. See PAUL GOLDBERGER, THE CrrY OBSERVED, NEW YORK: A GUIDE To THE, ARCHITECTURE OF MANHATrAN 56 (1979) [hereinafter GOLDBERGER, CITY OBSERVED].
    [Show full text]
  • Studying of Effective Urban Development Plans in Mashhad
    American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 2013 American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) e-ISSN : 2320-0847 p-ISSN : 2320-0936 Volume-02, Issue-09, pp-208-213 www.ajer.org Research Paper Open Access Evaluating of Mashhad urban development plans from compact city viewpoint Mohammad rahim Rahnama, Ali Homaeefar, Toktam Piruz Associate Professor Geography and Urban Planning department, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran PhD Scholar Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran PhD Scholar Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran Abstract: - There are many problems especially in large cities due to producing of urban development plans in different time, on the other hand; changing traditional to strategies approach is other reason for creating today problems. Therefore, one of the main factors of sustainability development principles is smart growth by emphasis on compactly. Mashhad metropolitan need, presentation sustainable development pattern in urban development plans due to complex structure and important position. Due to, are prepared development plans in various times, should be adapted with sustainable development principles and compact city indicators. In this research at first were studied indicators of smart growth pattern, after that was evaluated development and comprehensive plans based on these principles. Finding of research show, although there is mentioned viewpoint in urban development plans but haven’t succeeded in order to achieving smart growth. On the other hand, Mashhad Middle West area is one of the main districts that smart growth principles are nearly, but it isn’t success completely. Key word: - Compactly, smart city, Mashhad comprehensive and development plan I.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction The land use plan is the guide for tools used by citizens of Dickinson County to minimize tax burden from infrastructure and services, maintain aesthetic qualities of the agrarian landscape, appropriately locate new industry, commercial business and residents, and protect, conserve or enhance water resources. The future land use plan implements the vision and goals identified throughout this plan by addressing key planning elements: o Agriculture, Open Space & Rural Preservation o Aquifer and Surface Water Resources for Water Supply o Land and Economic Development via Smart Growth The land use plan is built upon a LESA (Land Evaluation and Site Assessment) model process developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and adapted for Dickinson County. LESA is a community based land use decision making model. The results presented hereafter represent valid results of the LESA process. The GIS LESA model and associated GIS data layers provided the county as part of this study afford efficient review and use of the model under different value ratings if deemed necessary. Citizen engagement in the continued development of the LESA model could improve citizen approval of land use planning decisions. The LE or Land Evaluation aspect of LESA evaluates natural resources and identifies locations for certain types of land uses based on natural resource characteristics. The SA or Site Assessment aspect assesses natural resource locations in combination with location of existing infrastructure and social resources to assess the appropriateness of land use. The land use plan is then developed around the combined natural and social resources evaluation and assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Sustainability Through Heritage Preservation: Two Chinese Case Studies
    sustainability Article Developmental Sustainability through Heritage Preservation: Two Chinese Case Studies Xiao Song 1, Kee-Cheok Cheong 2, Qianyi Wang 3 and Yurui Li 4,5,* 1 Cultural Center Malaysia, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; [email protected] 3 Economic School, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264000, China; [email protected] 4 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100020, China 5 Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100020, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 March 2020; Accepted: 28 April 2020; Published: 3 May 2020 Abstract: Cultural heritage is a vital part of a society’s existence. This role has particular relevance for China, with arguably one of the largest stocks of cultural assets, tangible and intangible, in the world. Recognizing the tension between cultural preservation and economic development as a general context, this paper examines the specific additional challenges China faces in its rush towards economic development. In providing both generic and China-specific contexts, this paper has as its objective to understand how Chinese policy-makers, both central and local, attempt to resolve the contest between cultural preservation and economic development, specifically rural rejuvenation. Through two case studies—of Lijiang in Yunnan province and Rizhao in Shandong province—this paper shows contrasting strategies to leverage local intangible cultural assets. Comparing these strategies reveals both the advantages and challenges inherent in each. A successful strategy captures the benefits of cultural tourism while minimizing its costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Element
    Comprehensive Plan Historic Preservation Element Proposed Amendments DELETIONS ADDITIONS 1000 OVERVIEW Overview 1000 1000.1 The Historic Preservation Element guides planning for the protection, revitalization, and preservation of the city’s Washington, DC’s valuable historic assets. It defines the District’s role in exercising preservation leadership, promoting awareness of Washington, DC history, identifying and preserving historic resources, and ensuring promoting compatible design in historic neighborhoods. The Eelement recognizes historic preservation as an important local government responsibility an important responsibility at all levels of government and as a valuable planning tool that provides an opportunity for community input, development collaboration, partnerships, and education. Historic preservation offers a sustainable urban development model that fosters a sense of community well-being and an appreciation of the multifaceted achievements of past Washingtonians. 1000.1 1000.2 The critical historic preservation issues facing Washington, DCthe District of Columbia are addressed in this Eelement. These include: ● Defining what constitutes a "historic" resource ● Welcoming new growth in the District while preserving its historic character; ● Advancing cultural heritage planning that supports active use and appreciation of the District’s distinctive places; ● Commemorating the sites of significant events and the places associated with individuals significant in District history; ● Identifying appropriate means to preserve the
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Postdoctorado Vol 2.Cdr
    E P G Producido por: ESCUELA DE POSTGRADO ESCUELA DE POSTGRADO U N I V E R S I D A D N A C I O N A L H E R M I L I O E P G VALDIZÁN EDITOR/DIRECTOR: Reynaldo Marcial Ostos Miraval EDITOR/SUBDIRECTORES: Adalberto Lucas Cabello Abner Fonseca Livias ISSN 2414-2832 COMITÉ EDITORIAL: Andrés Avelino Camara Acero Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán Facultad de Educación Gaceta Cientíca Cayto Didí Miraval Tarazona DIVULGACIÓN DE ARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICOS Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán Facultad Ciencias Contables y Financieras VOL. 1 AÑO 2 / ENERO - JUNIO 2015 Mary Luisa Maque Ponce Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán Facultad de Obstetricia EDITORES ADJUNTOS: RESERVA DE DERECHOS: Claudia Rocío Otálora Martínez Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de la revista, sin autorización previa del editor. PERSONAL ADMINISTRATIVO: Paolo César Meneses Mallqui PERIODICIDAD Y DISTRIBUCIÓN: Yimmy Cristian Encalada Martel La edición de la revista se realiza semestralmente, su Fabio Amadeo Falcón Rojas distribución es gratuita y sin fines de lucro a las Bibliotecas Municipales y Escolares, Bibliotecas de REVISIÓN DE TEXTOS: Universidades, Institutos de Educación Superior, Ramos Giles, Wilmer Fausto Institutos de Investigación y Desarrollo, Colegios Profesionales; Investigadores y Profesionales del país y EDITOR DE CONTENIDO: del extranjero, asimismo contamos con una edición Cristian Hilario Rivas digital en linea disponible para el público en general, de acceso libre y gratuito en: www.postgrado.unheval.e- TIRAJE 1 000 ejemplares du.pe VERSIÓN IMPRESA DISTRIBUCIÓN GRATUITA DIRECCIÓN Y CORRESPONDENCIA: Av. Universitaria 601-607 - Pabellón “5” Block “A” Publicación semestral Pillco Marca - Huánuco-Perú. Hecho el depósito legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    TOWARDS A POST-ANTHROPOCENE PERSPECTIVE ON THE WELFARE CITY: PUBLIC LANDSCAPES AS GREEN HERITAGE ‘WILD CARD’ ELLEN BRAAE SIGNE SOPHIE BØGGILD UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN [email protected] [email protected] The welfare city with its humanistic, anthropocentric PRELUDE: HERITAGE-BASED BRANDING VERSUS CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION and progressive design ideals of the good life and The new town Albertslund in Vestegnen near Copenha- egalitarianism usually signifies the post-war welfare gen is often described as a heritage vacuum: a tabula rasa masterplan erasing previous signs of memory and state’s tabula rasa suburbs with evergreen public identity during the 1960s. In 2009, just seven buildings landscapes as common ground for public happiness. were listed in Vestegnen where 250,000 of 5.4 million Danes reside. Only one building from the 20th century – Inspired by the recent discourse of the anthropocene, Arne Jacobsen’s Rødovre Town Hall, no buildings within Albertslund’s municipal borders and not one we examine the welfare city’s materialisation in a landscape was mentioned. Influenced by the rational, wider perspective, as a relational assemblage of cultu- modernist landscape gaze, Albertslund’s planners aimed to add new qualities in a controlled network of zoned rally significant landscapes, organised and administe- islands, dispersed like an archipelago across Vesteg- nen’s pancake-flat plateau that they judged empty. It red by various institutions, legislations and vocabula- was formerly cultivated as farmland and now contains ries, to structure and stage a national vision of the green spaces, housing areas, industrial districts, sports fields, and more. It is divided by unintentional in- good life.
    [Show full text]
  • How Preservation Can Introduce Social Sustainability to Building Certification Programs
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2016 Certifying Preservation: How Preservation Can Introduce Social Sustainability to Building Certification Programs Andrea Kathryn Haley University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Haley, Andrea Kathryn, "Certifying Preservation: How Preservation Can Introduce Social Sustainability to Building Certification Programs" (2016). Theses (Historic Preservation). 615. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/615 Suggested Citation: Haley, Andrea Kathryn (2016). Certifying Preservation: How Preservation Can Introduce Social Sustainability to Building Certification Programs. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/615 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Certifying Preservation: How Preservation Can Introduce Social Sustainability to Building Certification Programs Abstract When sustainability is discussed in the built environment it is often limited to environmental sustainability, however, there are many other values that should be considered. The field of historic preservation offers ways to incorporate social and cultural sustainability into the built fabric of cities and communities, but is often misrepresented or viewed as a niche field. This thesis explored how historic preservation
    [Show full text]