The Floater Issue 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Floater Issue 5 THE FLOATER February 2016 Page 1 INSIDE: ● Broads Authority make concessions - Page two Issue 5 February 2016 The only paper for boaters produced by boaters ● Two thirds of winter moorings empty - Page three Flood plan ● Batteries - are you doing it wrong - Page threat to four boat homes ORE boat homes may Mnow be at risk – if one version of a new flood prevention scheme for Oxford goes ahead – and it looks as if the Environment Agency proposers of the scheme were not ini- tially aware that the 24 boat homes would be hit. The boats, which are moored on long-standing riverside moorings on Weirs Mill Stream in the Notice of the consultation posted on a fence on city, have become the Weirs Mill Stream potential victims of one and many other birds ties, the oldest in their part of a multi-million which would inevitably be eighties. pound flood relief scheme. affected, they argue. They have had one early Tim Wiseman, of the Weirs The group are also con- victory. In the first plans Orchard Moorings cerned that residents are the boat homes were not Residents' Association, already suffering 'planning indicated on the EA plans which represents 17 of the blight'. but that is now being recti- 24 boats moored on the “Our boats and mooring fied - albeit with a line of stream, said “Recent Residents of Weirs Mill Stream are trying to persuade the Environment rights are purchased as a dots. flooding has badly hit local Agency to pick a flood scheme that doesn’t remove their boat homes. package and are sold Tim added: “It is the homes and businesses together. As a result, sales unique nature of the envi- progress these instead. number of options to flowing across Iffley and it is clear that Oxford will be harder to make and ronment here that adds “It is important that the each, to develop much- Meadows from the main needs a new scheme to values will fall. For many, much to this community Environment Agency, city needed flood protection to river into the Weirs Mill help protect homes, busi- this represents our entire and we would be shat- and county council con- protect Oxford. Stream in order to enable ness and infrastructure. life-savings which are at tered if we were to see it sider the enormous human The the three options for greater discharge across “However, of the three risk,” said Tim Wiseman. reduced to a bleak artificial impact and environmental this Weirs Mill Stream are the area. options presented, one is Neither the second or third landscape. The area is not damage this option will cutting widening and The Environment Agency extremely concerning as it options have any direct only enjoyed by ourselves, have, together with addi- straightening the Weirs Mill claims each would be potentially leaves some impact on any other local our friends and family, but tional cost to the public Stream to enable faster equally effective, based on homeless and would shat- properties. the many other river users purse.” flow onto the flood plain; hydrological modelling but ter our community and the Weirs Orchard Moorings such as anglers and The formal public consul- or building additional the first would mean the unique natural environ- are long-established, canoeists, not forgetting tation on the Oxford Flood physical protection to the loss of permanent residen- ment here. private moorings located the residents of those Alleviation Scheme Abingdon Road area and tial moorings at Weirs "The alternative options on a back-stream which houses on Canning opened, for six weeks, in constructing new culverts Orchard which the will bring the same flood runs from Longbridges on Crescent whose gardens mid January. It sets out to enable faster flow onto boaters say represents a protection for the local the main river, down under come down to the river on seven areas of works the flood plain; or con- loss of scant affordable area, without this impact. Donnington Bridge, the opposite side. across the city with a structing a new channel housing and environmen- We urge the authorities to beyond the southern “We don't want to be tally-friendly living, At the bypass and then re-joining adversarial with the EA or very least it will bring the Thames downstream local authorities, but we about the displacement of of Iffley Lock. need them to see the 17 boats for up to six The moorings, owned by impacts of this option. months during construc- Mr John Burbank and his "I hope readers of The tion, and loss of around family, date back to the Floater will support us by 5m of bank, effectively 1960s and have been emailing removing all of boaters' granted a Certificate of oxfordscheme@environ- gardens and storage. Lawful Use. ment-agency.gov.uk and The boaters say the first The boats are home to urge them to protect pre- option would mean more than 30 people cious residential destruction of a mature (including visiting children), moorings." orchard, the removal of an including professional area of mature natural tradesmen and women, Inside: latest on broadleaf woodland, and journalist, artists, actor, turning a natural channel the battle of musicians, a local GP, a into a wide, straight canal. psychologist, other NHS Thorpe Island in The area is home to a and healthcare profes- Norwich were diverse ecology, including sions, and those in the IT otters, hedgehogs, slow- more boat homes or charitable sectors. The Some of the moorings on the Weirs Mill stream worms, kingfishers, owls youngest are in their twen- are threatended THE FLOATER Talks start after boaters take on fight for homes February 2016 Page 2 Broads Authority offer concessions to battling boaters By Peter and social media campaign Underwood with thousands signing an online petition and others contributing to an online crowd-funding initiative to he battle to save pay for legal challenges, boat homes in have directed their fire at TNorwich, where the key officials within the Broads Authority were Broads Authority. threatening 41 boaters Rhetoric with eviction just before They defend the tactic, say- Christmas seems to be ing it has brought the taking a more conciliato- Authority to the table but ry route as the planners now say it is time to ' sus- found themselves faced pend the rhetoric and con- with determined and very centrate on the job in hand.' vocal opposition. Gary says he is 'cautiously The boaters living at the optimistic'. western end of Thorpe That optimism is reinforced Island, known as Jenner’s by the fact that planning Basin, had been threatened and development consult- with criminal proceedings if ants, Lanpro, have written to they did not comply with an The Broads Authority about injunction. This was despite Above and below: Boats on Thorpe Island in Jenner's Basin. In a letter liveaboards being present Norwich. dated 19th January 2016, Lanpro challenge The action.” Broads Authority version of Both parties have agreed to on this stretch of the River to further negotiations, were 'the facts' and confirm the consider appointing an inde- Yare since at least 1922 and open to the proposal to sus- boaters' view that the moor- pendent planner to come up the landowner having both a pend enforcement for a fur- ings have full legal standing. with a design for the basin. Covenant and full planning ther six months following a permission for residential meeting of the authority’s Alternative Cambridge Eviction moorings. John Packman, the Broads memebers in March. Meanwhile an attempt by Authority’s chief executive, Meeting Amicable Cambridge City Council to is quoted by the local At a meeting in the last Gary Barnes who attended forcibly evict Marinus evening newspaper saying: week of January between the meeting on behalf of the Venema and his wife from “There is an alternative way representatives of Thorpe boaters said: “The discus- their boat Moonbeam forward and that is to sub- Island and The Broads sion was amicable and we Shadow on Stourbridge mit a planning application. Authority, the Authority were in agreement about the Common and make them “An inspector did say it backed down on earlier need to work together to homeless, has fizzled out. would be suitable for 25 threats and confirmed that find a solution to the situa- With the assistance of boats. Is there a way of no action is planned, nor do tion at Jenner's Basin that other boaters the boat using your resources to they expect any action to be meets the hopes and was carefully moved a few develop a plan which we forthcoming against the expectations of all parties hundred yards and could share with the plan- moorings the other end of involved.“I am very confi- moored on land not con- ning authority?” Thorpe Island, an area dent that there is a willing- trolled by the City Council, called River Green. Gary Barnes told the meet- ness on all sides to work ing: “In order to do that we although he has posted They also do not anticipate together in the best interests recently on his Facebook taking any immediate would need some time. I of all concerned.”The cam- think it would be a good that he is now in conflict enforcement action at paigners, who have mount- gesture from the authority to with the River Jenner's Basin and, subject ed a highly effective media suspend any enforcement CamConservancy The Non transferable boat licences - but it Floater Written designed and published by News Afloat - a unique boat-based seems no-one told brokers selling boats publisher travelling on the British inland waterways.
Recommended publications
  • MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside
    MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside Archaeological Excavation Report Oxford Archaeology North March 2012 Countryside Neptune llp Issue No: 2011-12/1243 OA North Job: L10312 NGR: SJ 3403 9008 Mann Island, Merseyside: Archaeological Excavation Report 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Circumstances of the Project .............................................................................................. 7 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology............................................................................. 8 1.3 Previous Work.................................................................................................................... 8 2. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Project Design.................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Excavation and Watching Brief .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Cruise Terminal
    Liverpool Cruise Terminal Information to inform a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Appropriate Assessment October 2019 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Merchants House, Wapping Road, Bristol BS1 4RW, United Kingdom www.watermangroup.com Client Name: Liverpool City Council Document Reference: WIE12464-100-11-3-2-AA Project Number: WIE12464-100 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2008, BS EN ISO 14001: 2004 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 10-2-1-HRA November 2017 Niall Machin Simon Dowell Gavin Spowage Associate Director Senior Consultant Associate Director Comments: HRA to support planning application 10-4-1-HRA June 2018 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-2-3-AA January 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA and Appropriate Assessment to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-3-1-AA October 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: Addressing Natural England consultation responses Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Merseyside Waste Development Plan Document
    Joint Merseyside & Halton Waste Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Re-issued report including assessment of main modifications following the Examination Hearings August 2012 Waste Planning Merseyside SA of the Joint Merseyside Waste Local Plan Revision Schedule August 2012 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2011 Draft J. Boca Colin Bush Colin Bush 02 Final J. Boca Colin Bush Colin Bush 03 August 2012 Revised Final Colin Bush A. Wooddisse A. Wooddisse Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the use of Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. Where the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others it is upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between 2011 and 2012 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available.
    [Show full text]
  • JH CV Feb 2014 Copy
    CV of John Hinchliffe 15.2.15 ! Qualifications; B.A. (Hons) Town and Country Planning – University of Manchester 1978 B. Planning – University of Manchester 1979 !M.Sc. Building Heritage and Conservation – University of Central Lancashire 1987 Professional Memberships; Royal Town Planning Institute !Institute of Historic Building Conservation Other Memberships; Georgian Group Victorian Society National Trust Merseyside Civic Society !Lathom Park Trust !Employment; !1. September 2012- present: Hinchliffe Heritage - Providing heritage advice service, primarily to: a) the owners of Stanley Dock, Liverpool to assist them with the conservation and conversion of this large ensemble of listed buildings in the Liverpool World Heritage Site and Conservation Area, b) the owners of Royal Haslar ! Hospital Gosport to assist in their conservation and conversion !- Providing expert advice to Craven DC on suitability of a site for development !- Appearing as Expert Heritage witness for Newcastle-u-L BC at a Public Inquiry !- Providing heritage advice on the heritage assets of Paisley to Renfrewshire Council !- Giving lectures on heritage issues !- Guiding tours of Liverpool’s World Heritage Site (WHS) - Principal author of Liverpool World Heritage City Book ! !2. August 2001 – September 2012: World Heritage Officer for Liverpool City Council 2.1 World Heritage responsibilities Initially responsible for co-ordinating and promoting Liverpool’s successful nomination as a !World Heritage Site and for producing the WHS Management Plan Subsequently responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Management Plan 2017 - 2024
    LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017 - 2024 DRAFT 4.0 TITLE PAGE Notes: Text draft only – images are indicative only 1 Foreword 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Liverpool is strongly committed to its heritage, affording it an active key role in fostering the growing national and international acclaim for its important cultural and economic offer. Liverpool has experienced a renaissance in recent decades through capitalising on its unique sense of place and a burgeoning combined retail, culture and leisure offer propelling the city to the peak of the world’s top destinations to visit. Growth and success has been underpinned by significant levels of investment from public and private sectors in the economy and its cultural heritage. The City Region has ambitious plans for growth. The Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site sits at the heart of the City Region and bears testament to the evolving ambitions and international capability of one of the most famous port cities in the world. The canals warehouses and docks show how Liverpool is engineered for success. The great architectural monuments, buildings and spaces are an enduring testament to it. The success story is not limited to the past and this Management Plan recognises the mutually- supporting agendas of growth and conservation and the continued desire for Liverpool to prosper. The City has excelled at improving the condition of its heritage, reducing ‘Heritage at Risk’ percentages to less than half of the national average. Significant private investment has been instrumental to this end. However, the World Heritage Site (WHS) faces major challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Management Plan 2017 - 2024
    LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017 - 2024 Prepared by LOCUS Consulting Ltd LIVERPOOL WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN // 1 GEORGE’S HALL GEORGE’S DETAIL OF MINTON TILES, ST TILES, ST MINTON OF DETAIL LIVER BIRD LIVER LIVERPOOL WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN // 2 Foreword I am pleased to introduce this Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Management Plan for the City of Liverpool, for the period 2017-2024. We in Liverpool are rightly proud of our heritage assets. Historic areas of our city centre and waterfront have been designated a World Heritage Site, recognised by UNESCO in 2004 as a supreme example of a maritime mercantile city. We accept that this great honour brings responsibilities and we are determined to care for our heritage, by applying sound conservation policies and good practice. The World Heritage Site Management Plan will have a crucial role to play in ensuring that the objectives of conservation and regeneration are both achieved. Since its nomination, Liverpool has made great strides to protect its World Heritage Site and in many ways the city has set a new bar in conservation efforts. The Council’s Buildings at Risk programme continues to be the most successful project of its type in England with a 75% reduction in its ‘at risk’ buildings in the past decade and 37 listed buildings upgraded within the World Heritage Site. We recognise more needs to be done to promote the appeal of the World Heritage Site and raise awareness with the public and developers and this new management plan is an important step.
    [Show full text]
  • MELKSHAM CANAL LINK PROJECT Sub-Title Sub-Title DECEMBER 2014
    MELKSHAM CANAL LINK PROJECT Sub-title Sub-title DECEMBER 2014 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Project Definition 5 Vision 6 Local Context 7 Potential Market Size 9 Canal Regeneration Projects 12 The Offer 15 Next Steps 27 Appendices 28 MELKSHAM CANAL LINK PROJECT 3 INTRODUCTION The Melksham Canal Link is an ambitious regeneration project to construct 3km of new canal and towpaths outside the Wiltshire town of Melksham.This will link the Kennet and Avon Canal at Semington with Melksham town centre, creating a vibrant new destination hub with a sensitive mix of cultural and commercial development proposed along the length of the new link. Ultimately, the aspiration is to link this new section of the canal to an adapted section of the River Avon, enhancing the connectivity of the canal and river network. This project will include a new wetlands nature reserve, MELKSHAM visitor attraction, marina, camping and log cabin site, hotel and housing. BERRYFIELD Key SEMINGTON Outline of project area 4 PROJECT DEFINITION The project will have the following proposed key and mutually supporting elements, creating a critical mass that will be a destination for day and overnight stays. The location and exact nature of the visitor hubs / centres are still to be defined. This will occur during the more detailed masterplanning stage with input from the landscape architects. RIVER AVON MELKSHAM PROPOSED NEW CANAL LINK BERRYFIELD Key Wiltshire Wildlife Trust Wiltshire Life Housing Camping and log cabin site KENNET AND AVON CANAL Melksham Marina Proposed visitor hubs / centres SEMINGTON Holbrook Dairy Farm MELKSHAM CANAL LINK PROJECT 5 VISION There is a strong vision for the project, based on initial planning and development work, and engagement of key stakeholders: The Melksham Link is one of the must-see destinations in Wiltshire, attracting tourists and locals to its diverse leisure and cultural experiences and driving prosperity in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Southampton Canal Society Newsletter
    Chairman’s Column Welcome to our Speaker place (details in the next Newsletter) for the tour to We are delighted to welcome Alan Smith to our April start at 11am. Please see Maureen Greenham at meeting with his talk about “Alaska and the Yukon”. meetings or contact her (Tel: 023 8040.6951 or Email: [email protected]) to book your 2009 Society Boat Gathering place. Issue 435 : April 2009 : April Issue 435 Further to items in previous Newsletters, to date the Next Month’s Speaker crews of five boats have indicated they will be attending this year’s informal get together over the Don’t forget, our May meeting will actually be held on early May bank holiday weekend. If others would like Thursday 30 April. We have a special treat that to take part and haven’t yet spoken to me, I would be evening when the well known waterways campaigner delighted to hear from you as soon as possible. and author, Dr Roger Squires, will be making a very welcome return visit to us. Roger has been heavily Proposed Visit to the Purton Hulks involved with the waterways and the IWA for many Following on from the item in our last Newsletter, a years. He is an IWA Life Member and Trustee, has reminder that the Society has arranged an outing to been involved with London IWA since 1974 and joined visit the Purton Hulks on Saturday 16 May. The cost of IWA’s Council, as Chairman of the London Region, in the 2+ hour tour will be £3.50 each.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Canal Link Skippers Guide & Information Pack
    Liverpool Canal Link Skippers Guide & Information Pack Page 1 Contents Page Number Cover Page 1 Contents Page 2 History & Liverpool Canal Link Background 3 Opening times and booking information 4 General Information 5 Leeds & Liverpool Canal service stations 6 Salthouse Dock Facilities 7 Entering Liverpool South Docks for your stay in Liverpool Salthouse Dock 8-12 Leaving Liverpool South Docks for the return trip to the Leeds & Liverpool 12 Canal Cancellation Process 13 Dimensions and Useful and Emergency numbers 14 Liverpool Canal Link Route Map 15 Winter Moorings Information 16 Rules of Navigation 17 Diagram of Salthouse Dock 18 Page 2 History & Background The Leeds & Liverpool Canal was authorised in 1770 and constructed in sections until the main line, delayed by the wars with France, was complete by 1816. At this time, the canal terminus in Liverpool was near Old Leeds Street and consisted of a basin several metres away from and above the nearest docks which were George’s Dock and Basin. These led to the construction of the South Docks of Albert, Salthouse and others further up the river. Due to there being no direct connection between the canal and docks, transhipment of goods from docks to canal and vice versa was a laborious and inefficient task. During development on the Central Docks North down the River Mersey estuary in the mid- 1800s, a flight of four locks was constructed at Stanley Lock Flight to carry canal vessels down to the docks and entered the dock system through Stanley, Collingwood and Salisbury Docks. Here a barge lock was constructed to allow vessels to enter the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Princes Dock
    PRINCES DOCK A WATERFRONT FOR THE WORLD WHY LIVERPOOL HAS THE LIVERPOOL? MAJOR FASTEST RISING INFRASTRUCTURE PRODUCTIVITY OF ANY 3 UNIVERSITIES INVESTMENT MAJOR CITY OUTSIDE combined student total of TO SUPPORT NORTHERN LONDON POWERHOUSE F WITH AN ECONOMY OF OVER MAJOR MINUTES’ DRIVE 2m INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS OF LIVERPOOL £25 38,000 CITY CENTRE WITHIN COMMUTING POPULATION O DISTANCE OF LIVERPOOL WATERS BUSINESSES WITHIN BILLION 7 WORKING WITHIN THE CITY DIRECT TRAIN FROM LIVERPOOL TO MANCHESTER IN 35 MINS DIRECT TRAIN FROM LONDON TO LIVERPOOL IN 2 HOURS The University of Liverpool The Tate Liverpool The Beatles Museum Liverpool john Lennon Airport Liverpool Lime Street Port of Liverpool Titanic Hotel Bar BT Convention Centre Liverpool One Shopping Centre METROPOLITAN LIVERPOOL JOHN JAMES STREET CATHEDRAL LENNON AIRPORT STATION LIVERPOOL AND STANLEY DOCK EVERTON FOOTBALL LIME STREET CLUB STADIUMS STATION CRUISE TERMINAL PIER HEAD AND KNOWLEDGE WATERFRONT QUARTER LIVERPOOL TOWN HALL BEATLES MUSEUM MOORFIELDS RETAIL QUARTER STATION TATE ECHO ARENA COMMERCIAL DISTRICT KEY: LIVERPOOL WATERS SITE BOUNDARY PRINCES DOCK LIVERPOOL WATERS VISION Planning permission was granted for the following proposed uses across the Liverpool Waters masterplan: • Regeneration of 150 acres RESIDENTIAL ASSEMBLY & LEISURE CONVENIENCE (FOOD) 9,000 DWELLINGS SUCH AS GYMS AND CINEMAS SHOPS SERVING MAINLY • Planning permission granted for 733,000 SQM 33,000 SQM DAY-TO-DAY REQUIREMENTS 1.8 million sqm mixed 8,000 SQM use development BUSINESS SPACE PUBS & WINE BARS PARKING
    [Show full text]
  • Central Docks Canal Link, Merseyside
    Central Docks Canal Link, Merseyside Archaeological Excavation and Watching Brief Report Oxford Archaeology North September 2011 British Waterways Issue No: 2011-12/1225 OA North Job No: L10408 NGR: SJ 334 914 Document Title: CENTRAL DOCKS CANAL LINK, MERSEYSIDE Document Type: Archaeological Excavation and Watching Brief Report Client: British Waterways Issue Number: 2010-11/1225 Job Number: L10408 National Grid Reference: SJ 334 914 Prepared by: Nick Johnson Position: Senior Project Manager Date: August 2011 Checked by: Murray Cook Signed Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2011 Approved by: Rachel Newman Signed Position: Senior Executive Officer: Research and Publication Date: September 2011 Receiving Museums: National Museums Liverpool Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeology Ltd (2011) Mill 3, Moor Lane Mills Janus House Moor Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1GF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 541000 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • No.1 Princes Dock Retail/Commercial Space
    NO.1 PRINCES DOCK RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SPACE WHY AN ECONOMY OF LIVERPOOL? LIVERPOOL HAS THE £25 BILLION The Liverpool City Region is one of the leading FASTEST RISING business and visitor destinations in the UK. PRODUCTIVITY OF ANY 3 UNIVERSITIES Over the last 10 years the city has undergone the most remarkable transformation of any UK city – with a waterfront WITH A TOTAL POPULATION OF MAJOR CITY OUTSIDE location that ranks amongst its peers across Europe as an outstanding place to visit, study, live and do business. 53,000 LONDON 2 MAJOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS WITHIN 3RD MOST VISITED CITY 45 MINUTES DRIVE OF LIVERPOOL CITY CENTRE IN THE UK BY OVERSEAS VISITORS POPULATION OF DIRECT TRAIN; LONDON 7.2 MILLION TO LIVERPOOL 2 HOURS WITHIN COMMUTING DISTANCE OF LIVERPOOL WATERS 38,000+ BUSINESSES WORKING WITHIN THE CITY MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE DIRECT TRAIN; LIVERPOOL INVESTMENT TO SUPPORT TO MANCHESTER 35 MINS NORTHERN POWERHOUSE Left to right ; The University of Liverpool, The Tate Liverpool, The Beatles Museum, Titanic Hotel Bar, BT Convention Centre, Liverpool One Shopping Centre LIVERPOOL WATERS OVERVIEW Liverpool Waters is situated adjacent to the world famous Pier Head on Liverpool’s UNESCO listed waterfront and is part of the city’s vibrant commercial district. It offers the rare opportunity of a tranquil waterfront setting within the city centre of Liverpool and is a world-class destination. With on-site amenities and bus links the development to and from the city’s public transport and main attractions, it is a 5 minute walk from Merseyrail’s Moorfields and James Street rail stations, which provide direct access to the Wirral and Northern Lines.
    [Show full text]