Title of Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title of Project Local Action Plan City of Liverpool April 2011 2 THE CITY OF LIVERPOOL LIVERPOOL HAS APPROXIMATELY 436,000 INHBITANTS, OF WHICH ABOUT 19,000 LIVE IN THE CITY CENTRE. LIVERPOOL WAS INSCRIBED ON TO UNESCO’S WORLD HERITAGE LIST IN 2004 AS THE SUPREME EXAMPLE OF A COMMERCIAL PORT OF THE 18TH, 19TH AND EARLY 20TH CENTURIES. Liverpool is one of the two principal cities in the North West of England, along with Manchester which is ap- proximately 30 miles (48 km) to the east. It lies on the east bank of the River Mersey, almost where it meets the Irish Sea. It is a sub-regional centre for Merseyside and North Wales. The population of the City of Liv- erpool has declined from 855,500 in 1931 to about 436,000 in 2008. During that same period, the population of the Merseyside sub-region has also fallen, but by a much smaller percentage from 1,508,725 to 1,347,800. The municipal district of Liverpool measures approximately 112sq km. The historic urban area of the World Heritage Site covers 1.36 sq km and has a growing population of inhabitants which was 1,850. in 2008 when Liverpool was European Capital of Culture. Liverpool was founded by King John in 1207 but tury, a continuous line of docks had been built grew very slowly for the first 500 years and only along 11 kilometres of the east bank of the river, the medieval street plan survives above ground supported by a transport infrastructure and com- from that period. Liverpool’s rapid expansion be- mercial buildings, warehouses and cultural build- gan with the opening of its first enclosed dock (the ings in the city centre. world’s first commercial enclosed wet dock) in 1715. Liverpool’s oldest surviving building is the Despite damage caused in the mid-late 20th by former Bluecoat School and Hospital of 1718. war-time bombing, industrial obsolescence and some inappropriate redevelopment, the historic By the end of the 18th century, Liverpool had built port and city are well preserved and retain a high a further 5 docks but by the end of the 19th cen- degree of authenticity and integrity. They bear witness to Liverpool’s historic significance and The Albert Dock Warehouses: opened in were inscribed on to UNESCO’s World Heritage 1846 as a complete system of fireproof List in 2004. The assessor from ICOMOS said warehouses that Liverpool has the biggest and most complete The Albert Dock Traffic Office: a contem- 3 system of historic docks in the world. porary part of the Albert Dock system, with a huge cast iron portico Five conservation areas have been designated to The Royal Liver Building – opened in protect the port and city centre and a further 29 1911, the 2nd of the three principal build- conservation area have been designated else- ings at the Pier Head facing the river. The where in the city. Over 250 individual buildings in tallest building in England when built and the World Heritage Site have been identified as one of the first reinforced concrete being of special architectural or historic interest frames. and included on UK’s statutory list. A total of over Bluecoat Chambers, School Lane – 2,500 buildings throughout the city are listed build- Opened 1717/8 as a charity school and ings. hospital. The oldest surviving building in the city centre The most highly graded protected buildings in the Oriel Chambers – Opened in 1864 with an World Heritage Site are: innovative cast iron frame and a fully glazed curtain wall Liverpool Town Hall – originally designed Former Bank of England, Castle Street – 1749-54. An excellent example of a mid- Opened 1848. A monumental composition 18th century classical civic building of Greek and Roman Doric architecture. St George’s Hall – opened 1855, with the unusual combination of uses of courts For further information: and a concert hall. An exemplar of neo- www.liverpoolworldheritage.com classical architecture Oriel Chambers 1864 Albert Dock Traffic Office 1848 Local Challenges and Actions A Fractured Economy, Society and Urban Landscape 4 From the zenith of its trading powers in the early spirit of place. In short, the city recalled its past 20th century, Liverpool entered a long period of glory to inform and create a brighter future. economic decline as it entered the post industrial era. The level of industrial output in the hinterland From the depths of the 1980s, Liverpool has of the port declined dramatically during the 20th transformed its city centre, waterfront and image century, reducing the demand for the services of utilizing its cultural heritage in a complex and sus- the port. Liverpool suffered substantial war-time tained programme of initiatives, which are not yet destruction and saw massive changes and decline complete and so are still on-going. The Mersey- in its port activities. Its historic docks around the side Development Corporation (MDC) was estab- city centre were closed and subsequent social lished by the UK government in 1981 with the problems followed. mission to secure self-sustaining regeneration on Merseyside. It was given full statutory powers for It became a shrinking city as its population of Liv- large areas of former docks, and was given sub- erpool’s fell from 855,000 in 1930 to 435,000 in stantial funds to achieve its mission, in partnership 2008, as its residents migrated outwards in search with other public sector bodies and the private of better homes and jobs. sector.The MDC facilitated and partially funded the implementation of a wide range of regenera- Mass unemployment and poor conditions for tion projects, which utilised Liverpool’s cultural those remaining led to civil riots on the streets of maritime heritage, including: Liverpool in 1981. Some said that Liverpool’s his- • Creating a Business Park in transit sheds toric port was nothing more than a mausoleum, as • Creating a marina and the first of the people and national companies deserted the sink- new waterfront housing ing ship. Liverpool had become a city in crisis and • Building a Water Sports Centre in the docks in desperate need of urban regeneration. • Building the Customs and Excise (Tax) Building over a dock • Significantly, converting the monumental dockside warehouses at Wapping Dock and Waterloo Dock into up-market apartments • Delivering the flagship project of the re- generation and restoration of the Albert Dock. Despite some losses, much of Liverpool’s historic waterfront had survived. Although much of it was Albert Dock in poor condition due to under-use and under- After the closure of the MDC, Liverpool Vision was maintenance, the public authorities recognised established in 1999 as the Urban Regeneration that its unique cultural heritage and historic water- agency for the city centre. Liverpool City Council front sets it apart from other cities in England. has worked closely with Liverpool Vision and They took the decision in the 1980’s to use its other partners to deliver further regeneration pro- cultural heritage and especially that along the his- jects which have been guided by a Strategic Re- toric waterfront, as a basis for the city’s urban re- generation Framework, including: generation, using protective legislation, acquisition • A new Cruise Liner Facility where necessary, and persuasion, as well as ur- • A new canal link • A revitalised Pier Head ban planning, to enhance and celebrate its unique • A new ferry terminal • A new arena and conference centre • New commercial office space • A new retail-led development which links the city centre to the water-front 5 The conservation of Liverpool’s cultural heritage is therefore set in the context of long-term strategies and actions to deliver urban regeneration, through partnership working and maximisation of public funding. Revitalised Pier Head The Arena, Conference Centre and Anglican Cathedral Liverpool’s waterfront LOCAL ACTION PLAN - LIVERPOOL 6 IN THE HERO NETWORK, THE LOCAL ACTION PLAN (LAP) IS DEFINED AS A CONCEPT PAPER THAT DESCRIBES HOW THE PARTNER CITY PLANS TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN INTEGRATED CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CHIMP) FOR THEIR HISTORIC AREA. FOR LIVERPOOL, THE HISTORIC AREA TO WHICH THE LAP RELATES IS, IN MOST CASES, THE LIVERPOOL WORLD HERITAGE SITE AND ITS BUFFER ZONE. HOWEVER, MANY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE PROPER MANAGEMENT OF LIVERPOOL’S CULTURAL HERITAGE ARE APPLICABLE ACROSS THE CITY, BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE WHS. WORK PLAN FOR THE The Liverpool WHS Management Plan is available DEVELOPMENT AND at http://www.liverpoolworldheritage.com/managingthe IMPLEMENTATION OF AN whs/management/managementplan/index.asp INTEGRATED CULTURAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR Liverpool’s experiences in producing the Manage- LIVERPOOL WORLD HERITAGE ment Plan were used for reference during the HerO SITE (CHIMP) Project. However, it was stated in the Management Plan that it would need to be reviewed and updated after 6 years and so the principal intention of Liver- Name of the Organisation and Country pool in joining the HerO Project was to undertake Planning Service, Regeneration Portfolio, Liverpool that review. City Council. United Kingdom Whilst some steps have been undertaken towards Background to the Liverpool the review of the Liverpool WHS Management Plan, the process has not been completed during the World Heritage Site (WHS) Man- HerO Project. The priority for utilisation of the limited agement Plan resources available for the management of the Liverpool’s inscription onto UNESCO’s World Heri- WHS, have been concentrated on implementing the tage List in 2004 was pre-dated by the production of existing Management Plan and developing other a Management Plan (approved December 2003) for sustainable management strategies. notably: the nominated WHS. The Liverpool WHS Manage- ment Plan provided a consensual framework for the conservation and management of the outstanding universal value of the World Heritage Site.
Recommended publications
  • MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside
    MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside Archaeological Excavation Report Oxford Archaeology North March 2012 Countryside Neptune llp Issue No: 2011-12/1243 OA North Job: L10312 NGR: SJ 3403 9008 Mann Island, Merseyside: Archaeological Excavation Report 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Circumstances of the Project .............................................................................................. 7 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology............................................................................. 8 1.3 Previous Work.................................................................................................................... 8 2. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Project Design.................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Excavation and Watching Brief .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No 12 PRINCES DOCK
    No 12 PRINCES DOCK Ground Floor Suite B 2,880 sq ft (267.5 sq m) LIVERPOOL 6 million workforce Wages are 10% lower than 2 major airports within within an hour national average and 50% 45 minutes’ drive The Liverpool City Region is attracting lower than City of London inward investment and international business. With new restaurants, bars and £10billion investment Catchment of 13 universities 2 hrs to London by train legendary nightlife, alongside waterfront planned in the City Region and over 213,000 students and cultural attractions, this is a place where people want to live, work and play. Benefiting from beautiful coastline and Largest collection of museums GVA to double to 500,000 businesses countryside, quality of life matters here. & galleries outside of London £1.75billion by 2030 within 1 hour of City Centre 13 Universities World-class entertainment Liverpool John Lennon Airport LIVERPOOL WATERS With an estimated value of £5 billion, Liverpool Waters is one of the largest regeneration projects within Europe and the largest single development opportunity in the city. Covering some 60 hectares and spanning 2.3 km of the city’s famous waterfront, Liverpool Waters will see the creation of a new mixed-use city district for Liverpool and bring back to life a swathe of historic dockland. Cruise Liner Terminal Central Park Proposed Everton Stadium Isle of Man Ferry Terminal Central Park LIVERPOOL 24 WATERS 23 11 25 5 27 31 35 30 29 34 33 13 32 6 37 8 1 16 12 14 28 9 20 4 36 42 3 45 7 44 10 43 2 41 39 46 15 19 22 17 21 18 40 38 26 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORT LEISURE ATTRACTIONS RESIDENTIAL FOOD AND DRINK AMENITIES 1 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Month Low Res 670173165.Pdf
    £1 Welcome to Liverpool Heritage Open Month! Determined Heritage Open Days are managed nationally by to build on the Heritage Open Days National Partnership the success and funded by English Heritage. of Heritage Heritage Open Month could never happen Open Days, without the enthusiasm and expertise of local celebrating people. Across England thousands of volunteers England’s will open their properties, organise activities fantastic and events and share their knowledge. To architecture everyone in Liverpool who has contributed and heritage, Liverpool is once to the fantastic 2013 Heritage Open Month again extending its cultural heritage programme we would like to say thank you. programme throughout September. The information contained in this booklet was In 2013 over 100 venues and correct at the time of print but may be subject organisations across the city are to change. involved in this year’s programme and buildings of a variety of architectural Further events may have also been added style and function will open their to the programme. Full details of the doors offering a once-a-year chance to Heritage Open Month programme and discover hidden treasures and enjoy a up to date information can be viewed on wide range of tours, and participate in VisitLiverpool.com/heritageopenmonth events bringing history alive. or call 0151 233 2008. For the national One of the attractions new to 2013 Heritage Open Days programme please is the Albany Building, former cotton go to broker’s meeting place with its stunning www.heritageopendays.org.uk cast iron work, open air staircase. or call 0207 553 9290 There is something to delight everyone during Heritage Open Month with new ways to experience the heritage of Liverpool for all the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Cruise Terminal
    Liverpool Cruise Terminal Information to inform a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Appropriate Assessment October 2019 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Merchants House, Wapping Road, Bristol BS1 4RW, United Kingdom www.watermangroup.com Client Name: Liverpool City Council Document Reference: WIE12464-100-11-3-2-AA Project Number: WIE12464-100 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2008, BS EN ISO 14001: 2004 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 10-2-1-HRA November 2017 Niall Machin Simon Dowell Gavin Spowage Associate Director Senior Consultant Associate Director Comments: HRA to support planning application 10-4-1-HRA June 2018 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-2-3-AA January 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA and Appropriate Assessment to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-3-1-AA October 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: Addressing Natural England consultation responses Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • LBF08 Front Cover
    Liverpool BA Business DIRECTORY www.liverpoolba.com Frank Green's Prints of Liverpool 0151 260 3241 Art Gallery Picture Framers ACCOUNTANTS & ACCOUNTING SERVICES 97 Oakfield Rd, Anfield, , , Liverpool L4 0UE www.frankgreen.co.uk Douglas Fairless Partnership 0151 709 1931 Accountants Seymour Chambers, 92 London Road, , , Liverpool L3 5NW AUCTIONEERS & VALUERS www.douglasfairless.co.uk Esau Credit Control Services Ltd 0845 054 0504 Cato Crane Auctioneers 0151 709 5559 Outsourcing, consultancy and training. Innovation House, Power Road, Bromborough, , Valuers and auctioneers of antiques and fine art for insurance, disposal and probate. 6 Stanhope Street, , , , Liverpool L8 5RF Wirral CH62 3QT www.esauccs.co.uk www.catocrane.co.uk Harvey Guinan 0151 709 7797 Accountants and Business Advisers; Registered Auditors Services include accounts, management accounts, Vat, 310 - 311 , Vanilla Factory, 39 Fleet St, , Liverpool Self assessment, corporation tax, payroll bureau, Audit, computerised accounts, training. Book Keeping and L1 4AR AUDIO-VISUAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES accounts outsourcing. P L McLachlan & Co. 0151 722 9454 Albany Aerials 2001 0151 226 8100 Broad range of financial services for small - to - medium sized businesses. 47 Manvers Road, Childwall, , , Liverpool L16 3NP Cable TV and Telecommunications 6 Allison Road, , , , Liverpool L13 9AD PDC Online Accountants 0151 281 6162 Calumet 0151 709 1665 We are Chartered Certified Accountants and members of the Sage accountants club. Our services include year-end suppliers of all audio visual
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No
    Newsletter No. HISTORY SOCIETY WINTER 2014 41 First Joint Study Day a Great Success Sunday, 26 October saw the staging of the Liverpool History our four expert speakers (the fifth was a ‘no show’!). It seems Society’s and the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire’s highly likely that the event will be held again, probably in 2016. first Joint Study Day: Prosperity and Private Philanthropy – How So, if you have any particular theme that you would like to see important was social welfare to the merchant community in explored, email: [email protected] Victorian Liverpool? And, despite some initial misgivings, it In the meantime, here is a very brief résumé of the topics covered turned out to be a big success with an excellent turnout to hear during the Study Day. The Liverpool trading community correspondence with peers was cited as 1750-1815: Networks near and far. evidence for this reinforcement of status Sheryllynne Haggerty set the scene for the through social activity. day discussing 18th century traders The importance of being seen to conform to establishing themselves in Liverpool, and society’s demands was strong, and was a the ways in which they built up and used driver in much of the philanthropic work business, social and family networks to undertaken in the mid-19th century. This enhance their trade and standing. social and cultural context to the work of the Sheryllynne described the intangible specific individuals: Rathbones and Mellys, nature of much of mercantile activity – provided an important context to their flimsy paper cheques represented much motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Visitor Economy Strategy to 2020
    LiverpooL City region visitor eConomy strategy to 2020 oCtober 2009 Figures updated February 2011 The independent economic model used for estimating the impact of the visitor economy changed in 2009 due to better information derived about Northwest day visitor spend and numbers. All figures used in this version of the report have been recalibrated to the new 2009 baseline. Other statistics have been updated where available. Minor adjustments to forecasts based on latest economic trends have also been included. All other information is unchanged. VisiON: A suMMAry it is 2020 and the visitor economy is now central World Heritage site, and for its festival spirit. to the regeneration of the Liverpool City region. it is particularly famous for its great sporting the visitor economy supports 55,000 jobs and music events and has a reputation for (up from 41,000 in 2009) and an annual visitor being a stylish and vibrant 24 hour city; popular spend of £4.2 billion (up from £2.8 billion). with couples and singles of all ages. good food, shopping and public transport underpin Liverpool is now well established as one of that offer and the City region is famous for its europe’s top twenty favourite cities to visit (39th friendliness, visitor welcome, its care for the in 2008). What’s more, following the success of environment and its distinctive visitor quarters, its year as european Capital of Culture, the city built around cultural hubs. visitors travel out continued to invest in its culture and heritage to attractions and destinations in other parts of and destination marketing; its decision to use the City region and this has extended the length the visitor economy as a vehicle to address of the short break and therefore increased the wider economic and social issues has paid value and reach of tourism in the City region.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Merseyside Waste Development Plan Document
    Joint Merseyside & Halton Waste Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Re-issued report including assessment of main modifications following the Examination Hearings August 2012 Waste Planning Merseyside SA of the Joint Merseyside Waste Local Plan Revision Schedule August 2012 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2011 Draft J. Boca Colin Bush Colin Bush 02 Final J. Boca Colin Bush Colin Bush 03 August 2012 Revised Final Colin Bush A. Wooddisse A. Wooddisse Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the use of Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. Where the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others it is upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between 2011 and 2012 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Atlantic (Ocean) Gateway to Executive on 11 March 2009
    Manchester City Council Item16 Executive 11 March 2009 Manchester City Council Report for Resolution Report To: Executive – 11th March 2009 Subject: Atlantic (Ocean) Gateway Report of: The Chief Executive Summary This report seeks to inform Members about an initiative, initially by Peel Holdings, which has potential implications for the economic growth of the city region. Recommendations That Executive:- (a) Acknowledge that there maybe some opportunities arising as a result of the Atlantic Gateway concept which have the potential to support the Manchester City Region Growth agenda (b) Agree that these opportunities need to be explored and evidenced in the context of the emerging Regional Strategy (c) Agree that the Council cannot support Atlantic Gateway as a concept of growth until more detailed evidence is made available and the concept is better defined and understood (d) Agree that, in close collaboration with other AGMA Authorities, the Council stands prepared to work constructively with Government Office, the NWDA and other agencies to develop an evidential base to ensure that the concept is appropriately defined, and bring forward aspects of the overall concept which promote and complement city region regeneration priorities. (e) Urge the NWDA to commission an economic, environmental and social cost benefit analysis of the concept and emerging proposals to: • maximise long-term sustainable economic growth • understand the impacts (positive and negative) that the pursuit of the concept could have on the abilities of the city-regions to drive overall regional growth • assist in ensuring public investment/intervention is better aligned and appropriately targeted (f) Request that Officers report back to this Executive on progress on these matters at relevant times.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration of a City Centre Liverpool
    liverpool 1 regeneration of a city centre liverpool regeneration of a city centre Front cover; Liverpool One site boundary overlaid on the Designed by BDP city’s historic shoreline. (BDP). © 2009 BDP Produced by contents 2 Looking north towards the 3 Mersey Estuary – Liverpool One in the Heart of the City. introduction 4 1 a historical overview of liverpool 6 2 city regeneration 22 3 masterplan evolution 42 4 planning strategy 60 5 concept designs 70 6 the park 98 7 active streets 112 8 beyond 2008 128 epilogue 136 acknowledgments 138 introduction 4 by terry davenport It’s very rare to lead an undertaking that and fitted out in an eight year period plus, of undoubted impact that Liverpool One has had 5 transforms the fortunes of a great city. It’s course, all the enormous infrastructure works on the city, its visitors and proud inhabitants. even more unusual for that city to be your required for such an initiative. However, more importantly in these uncharted home town and place of birth. Because of The public support for the project times, the challenge to the industry is how my personal familiarity it has been a great was evident from the outset. So many to maintain the regeneration of our towns privilege for me to have led the Liverpool One disappointments over so many past years and cities under a quite different set of masterplan team, on behalf of Grosvenor, from meant that the public’s appetite for change was circumstances, circumstances which mean that the first day of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluations of Cultural Properties
    WHC-04/28COM/INF.14A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE 28th ordinary session (28 June – 7 July 2004) Suzhou (China) EVALUATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES Prepared by the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) The IUCN and ICOMOS evaluations are made available to members of the World Heritage Committee. A small number of additional copies are also available from the secretariat. Thank you 2004 WORLD HERITAGE LIST Nominations 2004 I NOMINATIONS OF MIXED PROPERTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Europe – North America Extensions of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List United Kingdom – [N/C 387 bis] - St Kilda (Hirta) 1 B Latin America and the Caribbean New nominations Ecuador – [N/C 1124] - Cajas Lakes and the Ruins of Paredones 5 II NOMINATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Africa New nominations Mali – [C 1139] - Tomb of Askia 9 Togo – [C 1140] - Koutammakou, the Land of the Batammariba 13 B Arab States New nominations Jordan – [C 1093] - Um er-Rasas (Kastron Mefa'a) 17 Properties deferred or referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee Morocco – [C 1058 rev] See addendum: - Portuguese City of El Jadida (Mazagan) WHC-04/28.COM/INF.15A Add C Asia – Pacific New nominations Australia – [C 1131] - Royal Exhibition Building and Carlton Gardens 19 China – [C 1135] - Capital Cities and Tombs of the Ancient Koguryo Kingdom 24 India – [C 1101] - Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park 26 Iran – [C 1106] - Pasargadae (Pasargad) 30 Japan – [C 1142] - Sacred Sites
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board
    Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board Final Report 2016 A city becomes magnificent when the spaces between the buildings equal the architecture they frame Contents Mayoral Preface .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Chair’s Note ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1. The Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board ............................................................................................... 9 Board Members .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Overview and Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Background and Context ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Time of Austerity .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13 The Review ......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]