DOCSLIB.ORG

The Birth of Hedonism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE BIRTH OF HEDONISM THE BIRTH OF HEDONISM The Cyrenaic Philosophers and Pleasure as a Way of Life KURT LAMPE PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Princeton & Oxford Copyright © 2015 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu Jacket art: Henri Matisse, Luxe calme et volupte, 1904, Musée d'Orsay, Paris, France. © 2014 Succession H. Matisse / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Photo credit: © RMN–Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY / Hervé Lewandowski. All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Lampe, Kurt, 1977– The birth of hedonism : the Cyrenaic philosophers and pleasure as a way of life / Kurt Lampe. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 691- 16113- 6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Hedonism. 2. Cyrenaics (Greek philosophy) I. Title. B279.L36 2014 183'.5— dc23 2013039984 British Library Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Minion Printed on acid- free paper ∞ Printed in the United States of America 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 PARENTIBUS DILIGENTIBUS, QUI ME EDUCANDUM CURAVERINT SOPHIAE HANINA, CUIUS AMORE MAIOR SIM FACTUS UNIVERSITATIS BRISTOLIENSIS CONLEGIS, QUORUM CONSTANTIA AUDACIAQUE ME CORROBORAVERINT CONTENTS Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. A Cyrenaic Parable: The Choice of Pleasure 1 1.2. Methodology 3 1.3. Overview of the Book 8 1.4. A Note on Conventions 10 Chapter 2 Cyrene and the Cyrenaics: A Historical and Biographical Overview 12 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Fourth- Century Greek Philosophy 12 2.3. Cyrene and Cyrenaica 13 2.4. Aristippus 16 2.5. Mainstream Cyrenaicism 18 2.6. Hegesias 20 2.7. Anniceris 21 2.8. Theodorus 23 Chapter 3 Knowledge and Pleasure 26 3.1. Introduction 26 3.2. Aristippean Hedonism 27 3.3. Socrates’ Influence on Aristippus’s Hedonism 31 3.4. The Cyrenaic Theory of the Experiences 35 3.5. The Experiences as a Basis for Action 45 3.6. Cyrenaic Formulations of the End 52 Chapter 4 Virtue and Living Pleasantly 56 4.1. Introduction 56 4.2. Aristippus on Education, Virtue, and Happiness 57 4.3. Aristippean Presentism 64 4.4a. The Cyrenaics on Wealth, Justice, and Practical Wisdom 73 viii \ CONTENTS 4.4b. The Cyrenaics on Speaking Well and Freedom from Negative Emotions 76 4.4c. The Cyrenaics on Education, Habituation, and Spiritual Exercises 80 4.4d. Interim Conclusion 81 4.5. Cyrenaic Presentism 83 4.6. Cyrenaic Formulations of the End 85 Chapter 5 Eudaimonism and Anti- Eudaimonism 92 5.1. Introduction 92 5.2. Personal Identity 94 5.3. Radical Subjectivism 96 5.4. Aprudentialism 97 Chapter 6 Personal and Political Relationships 101 6.1. Introduction 101 6.2. Aristippus 103 6.3. Cyrenaics and Courtesans 105 6.4. Mainstream Cyrenaics 108 6.5. Hegesias and Theodorus 110 6.6. Anniceris 115 Chapter 7 Hegesias’s Pessimism 120 7.1. Introduction 120 7.2. Hegesiac “Targets” and the Hegesiac “End” 121 7.3. Ruthless Rationalism? 123 7.4. Indifference 128 7.5. Magnanimity and Philosophical Heroism 133 7.6. Autonomy and Cologne Papyrus 205 136 7.7. Pessimism and Heroism Revisited 142 Chapter 8 Theodorus’s Innovations 147 8.1. Introduction 147 8.2. Ends, Intermediates, and Indifference 148 8.3. Theodorus the Pyrrhonist? 149 8.4. The Extemporaneity of Ethical Value and Judgment 153 8.5. “Atheism” and Other Polemics 159 8.6. Heroism 164 8.7. Conclusion 167 Chapter 9 The “New Cyrenaicism” of Walter Pater 168 9.1. Introduction 168 CONTENTS / ix 9.2. Walter Pater: From the The Renaissance to Marius the Epicurean 168 9.3. Unitemporal Pleasure 173 9.4. From Education to Morality 180 9.5. The Hedonic “Economy” 186 9.6. The Fear of Death 189 Chapter 10 Conclusion: The Birth of Hedonism 193 Appendix 1: The Sources 198 1. Introduction 198 2. Aristotle 198 3. Cicero 199 4. Clement of Alexandria 200 5. Diogenes Laertius (and Hesychius and the Suda) 202 6. Epiphanius 205 7. Eusebius and Aristocles 207 8. Plato 208 9. Xenophon 209 Appendix 2: Annicerean Interpolation in D.L. 2.86– 93 211 1. Introduction 211 2. The Convergence between D.L. 2.86– 89 and Clement Strom. 2.21.130.7– 8 212 3. Formulations of the End and Demotion of Happiness 216 4. Anti- Epicurean Arguments 217 5. Conclusion 220 Notes 223 Bibliography 263 Index 275 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book began life as a PhD dissertation at the University of Berkeley in 2005– 2007. Above all I must thank Tony Long, my lead supervisor, for giving me the latitude to pursue my own interests at that time. The mandate to pro- duce an immediately publishable thesis, thank goodness, was never imposed on me. While this freedom led to many dead ends and complete revisions, the wandering involved has undoubtedly been fundamental not only for this book (notwithstanding its remaining flaws!), but also for my broader development as a scholar. For the last two years of my PhD I was actually resident either at Cambridge or at the Warburg Institute in London. I am grateful to both institutions for their supportive research environments. In particular I want to thank David Sedley and Malcolm Schofield at Cambridge and Charles Burnett at the Warburg. Many others have helped with both the PhD and subsequent drafts of this work. First, John Ferrari and Nelly Oliensis read drafts of many chapters at Berkeley. Hans Sluga read the completed dissertation and offered me his com- ments, as did Margaret Graver. As I revised and re- revised the manuscript, chapters were read by Geoffrey Lloyd, Duncan Kennedy, Charles Martindale, Lee Behlman, and Gillian Clark. Stephen Clark was kind enough to read almost an entire draft. To all of these people I owe my thanks—and indeed my apolo- gies, since I fear I have not always been a gracious recipient of criticism! I also owe a great deal of gratitude to the Classics & Ancient History Depart- ment at the University of Bristol, which has been unfailingly supportive during the long revision process. Indeed, from my first weeks here I was permitted to turn my attention to entirely new and unrelated projects. Without the lapse of time this created I do not think I would have arrived at some of the most im- portant interpretive claims in this book. Some of this material— often in embarrassingly undercooked form—has been presented at the APA convention in San Diego (2007), the University of Toronto (2007), the University of Cambridge (2010, 2011), and Durham Uni- versity (2011). I am grateful to those audiences for their criticisms. Finally, I want to thank Rob Tempio, my editor at Princeton University Press, and the referees. One of those referees— Voula Tsouna— chose to reveal her name to me afterwards. I have benefited from both her detailed report and from subsequent correspondence. ABBREVIATIONS My abbreviations for classical authors follow those of LSJ and The Oxford Latin Dictionary (ed. P.G.W. Clare, 1982. Oxford: Clarendon Press). For ease of refer- ence I list them here as well. I also give the publication details for works that are harder to find. All translations are my own unless otherwise noted. There exists no conve- nient English translation of the collected evidence for the Cyrenaics, although some of it can be found scattered through Boys- Stones and Rowe 2013. On- fray 2002 is currently the only modern-l anguage translation of this evidence of which I know, although another is forthcoming by Mársico. Those wishing to consult English translations of particular Greek or Roman works are advised to check first in the Loeb Classical Library series (Harvard University Press), whose translations of book titles I use in the following list. Translations and commentaries I have cited in the text are given in the bibliography under the name of the translator or commentator. Ael. = Aelian - AH = Animalium Historia (On Animals) - VH = Varia Historia (Historical Miscellany) Aët. = Aëtius, Placita (in Diels 1879, 267– 444) Al. Aphr. De An. = Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Anima Liber (On the Soul) Anecd. Gr. = Anecdota Graeca. Ed. J. Fr. Boissonade. 1829– 33. Paris: The Royal Press. Andron. Rh. = Pseudo- Andronicus of Rhodes: Περι Παθῶν. Édition critique du texte grecque et de la traduction latine médiévale. Ed. A. Glibert- Thirry. 1977. Leiden: Brill. Anon. Comm. in Pl. Tht. = Anonymous Commentarius in Platonis Theaetetum (Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus). Ed. G. Bastianini and D. N. Sedley. 1995. In Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci et latini vol. 3. Florence: Olschki. Apul. Flor. = Apuleius, Florida Ar. Av. = Aristophanes, Aves (Birds) Arist. = Aristotle - AH = Animalium Historia (History of Animals) - De An. = De Anima (On the Soul) - EN = Ethica Nicomachea (Nicomachean Ethics) xiv \ ABBREVIATIONS - Ph. = Physica (Physics) - Pol. = Politica (Politics) - Rhet. = Rhetorica (Rhetoric) [Arist.] MM = Pseudo- Aristotle, Magna Moralia Aristocles: See Chiesara 2001 Arius Didymus Epit. = Epitome of Stoic Ethics, ed. A. Pomeroy. 1999. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Arr. An. = Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander Athen. = Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae (The Learned Banqueters) Aug. Civ. Dei = Augustine, City of God Aulus Gellius, Noct. Att. = Noctes Atticae (Attic Nights) Auson. Opusc. = Ausonius, Opuscula (“Book III: Personal Poems” in the Loeb) Bion: see Kindstrand 1976 Callimachus Ep. = Epigrammata. Ed. R. Pfeiffer, 1953. Vol II: Hymni et Epigrammata. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cic. = Cicero - Fin. = De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum (On Ends) - Luc. = Lucullus (sometimes called the Prior Academics) - ND = De Natura Deorum (On the Nature of the Gods) - Off. = De Officiis (On Duties) - Tusc. = Tusculanae Disputationes (Tusculan Disputations) Clem. Al. = Clement of Alexandria - Paed.
Recommended publications
  • Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy

    Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy

    Comparative Philosophy Volume 9, No. 2 (2018): 1-40 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org EARLY PYRRHONISM AS A SECT OF BUDDHISM? A CASE STUDY IN THE METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY MONTE RANSOME JOHNSON & BRETT SHULTS ABSTRACT: We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy. Keywords: adiaphora, anātman, anattā, ataraxia, Buddha, Buddhism, Democritus, Pāli, Pyrrho, Pyrrhonism, Scepticism, trilakṣaṇa 1. INTRODUCTION One of the most ambitious recent works devoted to comparative philosophy is Christopher Beckwith’s monograph Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia (2015).
  • The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes

    The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes

    The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Charles Rann Kennedy The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Table of Contents The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes..............................................................................................1 Charles Rann Kennedy...................................................................................................................................1 THE FIRST OLYNTHIAC............................................................................................................................1 THE SECOND OLYNTHIAC.......................................................................................................................6 THE THIRD OLYNTHIAC........................................................................................................................10 THE FIRST PHILIPPIC..............................................................................................................................14 THE SECOND PHILIPPIC.........................................................................................................................21 THE THIRD PHILIPPIC.............................................................................................................................25 THE FOURTH PHILIPPIC.........................................................................................................................34 i The Olynthiacs and the Phillippics of Demosthenes Charles Rann Kennedy This page copyright © 2002 Blackmask Online.
  • Cyrenaics and Epicureans on Pleasure and the Good Life: the Original Debate and Its Later Revivals

    Cyrenaics and Epicureans on Pleasure and the Good Life: the Original Debate and Its Later Revivals

    Cyrenaics and Epicureans on Pleasure and the Good Life: The Original Debate and Its Later Revivals Voula Tsouna Both ancient and modern historians of philosophy contrast the ethics of the Cyrenaics and the Epicureans with each other. And although this opposition often derives from doxographical interventions, there is no doubt that it reflects a historical fact, namely a longstanding and persistent rivalry between the two schools. Philosophical as well as chronological factors appear to have favored its development: both schools posit pleasure as the supreme good and pain as the supreme evil. And they temporally overlap: Epicurus was a near contem- porary of the later Cyrenaic sects, whose leaders were Paraebates, Theodorus, Anniceris, and Hegesias. As for the last known representatives of these sects, they coincide in time with Epicurus’s immediate successors. The purpose of this paper is to lay out the initial controversy and exam- ine its revivals in the late Hellenistic and Roman eras. Part One offers some necessary background about the earlier stages of interaction between the two schools. Part Two explains how the Academics Cicero and Plutarch appeal to the Cyrenaic doctrine in order to pursue their own anti-Epicurean agendas. Parts Three and Four examine the ways in which two late Epicurean authors, Philodemus (first century BCE) and Diogenes of Oinoanda (second century CE), target the Cyrenaics for their own philosophical and dialectical purposes. Part Five argues that both the original debate and its reenactments qualify as cases of philosophical polemics. Also, it speculates on the reasons why the Epicureans and their critics resurrect the Cyrenaics to advance their own aims.
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of

    Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of

    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
  • The Epicurean School

    The Epicurean School

    IX Hellenistic Philosophy: The Epicurean School 1. THE PHILOSOPHERS Were we not upset by the worries that celestial phenomena and death might matter to us, and also by failure to appreciate the limits of pains and desires, we would have no need for natural philosophy. There is no way to dispel the fear about matters of supreme importance for someone who does not know what the nature of the universe is, but retains some of the fears based on mythology. Hence without natural philosophy there is no way of securing the purity of our pleasures. Epicurus, Principal Doctrines 11–12. Empty are the words of that philosopher who offers therapy for no human suffering. For just as there is no use in medical expertise if it does not give therapy for bodily diseases, so too there is no use in philosophy if it does not expel the sufferings of the soul. Epicurus, as quoted in Porphyry, To Marcella 31.1 Epicurus (342/1–270 BCE), the founder of the Epicurean school, was born in Samos, of Athenian parents, seven years after the death of Plato.2 His father, Neocles, a school master, had settled there in 352 with two thousand other Athenian cleruchs, colonists retaining a diminished form of Athenian citizenship. Economic adversity probably made emigration attractive to Neocles, for in leaving Athens he gave up a number of rights, including his vote in the Assembly, and the colonists would not have been popular with the Samians. Moreover, his profession enjoyed little status, and a number of later authors referred to Epicurus contemptuously as the son of a school teacher.
  • ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities

    ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities

    ARISTOXENUS OF TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities Series Editor: David C. Mirhady Advisory Board: William W. Fortenbaugh Dimitri Gutas Pamela M. Huby Timothy C. Powers Eckart Schütrumpf On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus I Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work II Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Rhetoric III Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos IV 7KHRSKUDVWXV+LV3V\FKRORJLFDO'R[RJUDSKLFDODQG6FLHQWLÀF Writings V Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle VI The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformation of Classical Traditions presented to Professor I.G. Kidd VII Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources VIII Demetrius of Phalerum: Text, Translation and Discussion IX Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation and Discussion X Eudemus of Rhodes XI Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes XII Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation and Discussion XIII Heraclides of Pontus: Text and Translation XIV Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion XV Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion XVI ARISTO XENUS OF TARENTUM DISCUSSION RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN CLASSICAL HUMANITIES VOLUMEXVU EDITED BY eARL A. HUFFMAN First published 2012 by Transaction Publishers Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2012 by Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
  • Leven: Een Kwestie Van Genieten1

    Leven: Een Kwestie Van Genieten1

    Leven: een kwestie van genieten1 Ik wandel door het bos. Het is een stralende, winterse dag. De zon schijnt. De bladeren kleuren bruin, geel, oranje, rood. Er ligt een dun laagje ijs op het water. Mijn vijf maanden oude zoontje bungelt in zijn draag- doek op mijn buik. Ik voel: het lichaam dat ik ben geniet op dit ogenblik. Ik zit thuis aan tafel. Kaarslicht werpt schaduwen op het muurkleed. Muziek uit Mali klinkt uit de luidsprekers. Ik eet een bord heerlijk gekruide Thaise vissoep en drink een glas Chardonnay. Ik voel: het lichaam dat ik ben geniet op dit ogenblik. Ik loop - vijf jaar geleden, ik herinner het mij als de dag van vandaag – ‘s ochtends vroeg van Thorung Phedi naar Thorung La (in de Himalaya), meer dan vijf duizend meter hoog. Overal om mij heen verblindend witte sneeuw, de blauwe hemel – letterlijk: “on top of the world”. Ik voel: het lichaam dat ik ben geniet op dit ogenblik. Ik zit op een rots, aan een kiezelstrand aan de kust van het Griekse eiland Amorgos. De Aegeïsche zee ligt diep blauw voor mij. Mijn vriendin zit op haar knieën voor mij. Zij pijpt mij. Ik kom klaar. Ik voel: het lichaam dat ik ben geniet op dit ogenblik. Vier momentopnamen uit mijn leven die ik niet beschreven vind in het ‘meest succesvolle Filosofieboek van 2002’, de door Joep Dohmen ver- zorgde bloemlezing Over levenskunst 2. Waarom niet? Zouden grote filosofen deze ogenblikken niet kennen? Zouden ze deze momenten van genieten niet beschouwen als behorende tot het goede leven? En ‘kleine filosofen’ dan? 1 Deze tekst verscheen in het tijdschrift Filosofie, (april/mei 2003) 2 Joep Dohmen: Over levenskunst.
  • History and Theory of Philosophy

    History and Theory of Philosophy

    FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION "BASHKIR STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY" OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTHCARE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (FSBEI HE BSMU MOH Russia) HISTORY AND THEORY OF PHILOSOPHY Textbook Ufa 2020 1 UDC 1(09)(075.8) BBC 87.3я7 H90 Reviewers: Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the department «Social work» FSBEI HE «Bashkir State University» U.S. Vildanov Doctor of Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Philosophy and History FSBEIHE «Bashkir State Agricultural University» A.I. Stoletov History and theory of philosophy:textbook/ K.V. Khramova, H90 R.I. Devyatkina, Z.R. Sadikova, O.M. Ivanova, O.G. Afanasyeva, A.S. Zubairova-Valeeva, N.R. Mingazova, G.R. Davletshina — Ufa: Ufa: FSBEIHEBSMUMOHRussia, 2020. – 127 p. The manual was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in specialty 31.05.01 «General Medicine» the current curriculum and on the basis of the work program on the discipline of philosophy. The manual is focused on the competence-based learning model. It has an original, uniform for all classes structure, including the topic, a summary of the training questions, the subject of essays, training materials, test items with response standards, recommended literature. This manual covers topics related to the periods of development of world philosophy. Designed for students in the specialty 31.05.01 «General Medicine». It is recommended to be published by the Coordinating Scientific and Methodological Council and was approved by the decision of the Editorial and Publishing Council of the BSMU of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.
  • A History of Cynicism

    A History of Cynicism

    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
  • Epicurus Epicurus Was Born in February 341 BCE

    Epicurus Epicurus Was Born in February 341 BCE

    Epicurus Epicurus was born in February 341 BCE. He earned his basic education in philosophy after four years of tutoring, and at the age of 18, Epicurus served in the military for two years in Athens. After completing his education, Epicurus began teaching around the Aegean, eventually settling back in Athens. There, he purchased some land and founded a school which was given the name of ‘The Garden’, for its construction in the garden of his house. The Garden soon became a notable institute for the progress of philosophical education, and it also held the exclusivity of being the first philosophical Greek institute that allowed women to take part in learning. Epicurus strongly advocated friendship as an important root for a happy and fulfilling life, and thus, his school provided the community with the opportunity to interact and form constructive relationships. Epicurus has played an extremely vital role in the progress of science as a discipline. Epicurus was the first Greek philosopher to attempt to break free society from religious superstitions by preaching that God does not punish or reward humans, and that a man’s sole objective should be to form a self-sufficient and happy life by surrounding oneself with reliable and cherished friends. Epicurus was a strong advocate of free will. The development of a pleasant and comfortable life, in his view, was the core purpose of life, and good and bad consequences could only be evaluated on the principles of pain and pleasure. Epicurus believed that whatever serves to provide pleasure can be termed as good, and whatever leads to discomfort can be termed as bad.
  • The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary

    The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary

    Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui THE PROTREPTICUS OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA: A COMMENTARY to; ga;r yeu'do" ouj yilh'/ th'/ paraqevsei tajlhqou'" diaskedavnnutai, th'/ de; crhvsei th'" ajlhqeiva" ejkbiazovmenon fugadeuvetai. La falsedad no se dispersa por la simple comparación con la verdad, sino que la práctica de la verdad la fuerza a huir. Protréptico 8.77.3 PREFACIO Una tesis doctoral debe tratar de contribuir al avance del conocimiento humano en su disciplina, y la pretensión de que este comentario al Protréptico tenga la máxima utilidad posible me obliga a escribirla en inglés porque es la única lengua que hoy casi todos los interesados pueden leer. Pero no deja de ser extraño que en la casa de Nebrija se deje de lado la lengua castellana. La deuda que contraigo ahora con el español sólo se paliará si en el futuro puedo, en compensación, “dar a los hombres de mi lengua obras en que mejor puedan emplear su ocio”. Empiezo ahora a saldarla, empleándola para estos agradecimientos, breves en extensión pero no en sinceridad. Mi gratitud va, en primer lugar, al Cardenal Don Gil Álvarez de Albornoz, fundador del Real Colegio de España, a cuya generosidad y previsión debo dos años provechosos y felices en Bolonia. Al Rector, José Guillermo García-Valdecasas, que administra la herencia de Albornoz con ejemplar dedicación, eficacia y amor a la casa. A todas las personas que trabajan en el Colegio y hacen que cumpla con creces los objetivos para los que se fundó. Y a mis compañeros bolonios durante estos dos años. Ha sido un honor muy grato disfrutar con todos ellos de la herencia albornociana.
  • Curriculum Vitae Voula Tsouna

    Curriculum Vitae Voula Tsouna

    1 Curriculum Vitae Voula Tsouna Department of Philosophy, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3090 [email protected] Place of Birth: Athens, Greece Nationality: Greek (EU) & USA Languages: Ancient Greek, Latin, French (fluent), English (fluent), Modern Greek (fluent), Italian (competent), German (reading) AREA OF SPECIALIZATION Ancient Philosophy AREAS OF COMPETENCE Siècle des Lumières (French Enlightment), Early Modern Philosophy, topics in Epistemology, Moral Psychology, and Ethics. EDUCATION 1988 PhD (Thèse de doctorat), Ancient Philosophy, University of Paris X 1984-86 Doctoral Research, fully enrolled graduate student at the University of Cambridge, King’s College 1984 Diplôme d’Études Approfondies (DEA, equivalent to the MA), Ancient Philosophy, University of Paris X 1983 Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy summa cum laude (Πτυχεῖον summa cum laude), Philosophy, University of Athens ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2006–present University of California at Santa Barbara, Full Professor 2000–2006 University of California at Santa Barbara, Associate Professor 1997–2000 University of California at Santa Barbara, Assistant Professor 1997 (Winter) University of California at Santa Barbara, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy 2010 (Spring) University of Crete, Holder of the Michelis Chair in Aesthetics at the Department of Philosophy and Social Studies 1994–1996 Pomona College, Visiting Assistant Professor 1992–1993 University of Glasgow, Scotland, Research Fellow 1991–1992 California State University at San Bernardino, Lecturer