DOCSLIB.ORG

Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information © in This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information © in This Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00987-5 — Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information Index Note: Page numbers followed by f indicate a figure; those with t indicate a table. Abāẓa family, 129 mobilization of, 107–9, 110t; landholding ʿAbbās, Kamāl, 196 patterns in, 203, 204t; modernized ʿAbd al-Ghafūr, ʿImād, 163, 171 infrastructure in, 124; property protection ʿAbd al-Majīd, Waḥīd, 69, 213 laws in, 188–89; reforms of the 1950s in, 32; ʿAbd al-Maqṣūd, al-Muḥammadī, 81 traditional networks of, 31–33, 107; vote ʿAbd al-Munʿim, ʿAlā, 225n37 share in 2012 in, 189, 190t ʿAbd al-Ṣādiq, Ṣābir, 92 Ahmed, Muhammad Sid, 50 ʿAbd al-Wahhāb, ʾAyman al-Sayyīd, Ahram Center for Political and Strategic 168–69 Studies, 57,61–62, 136–38 Abed-Kotob, Sena, 24, 149 ʿĀkif, Mahdī, 52, 77,165, 222, 223 Abū ʿAzīzī, Muḥammad, 200 Algerian civil war, 11–12 Abū Bāshā, Hasan, 63 Almond, Gabriel A., 21 Abū al-Futūḥ, ʿAbd al-Munʿim: charitable Aminzade, Ronald R., 20 organizations and, 76, 77; expulsion from al-ʿAnānī, Khalīl, 165 Muslim Brotherhood of, 163; as future Anderson, Benedict, 93 presidential candidate, 225n37; al-Nūr Party anti-Americanism, 210n2 support of, 171; vote share in 2012 of, 163, Appleby, R. Scott, 21 173t, 185–86, 189, 190t April 6 Movement, 9 Abū Ismāʿīl, Hāzim Salāh, 91, 163, Arab Barometer surveys, 135–36, 225n37 137f, 196 Abū al-ʿĪṭa, Kamāl, 127,168–69 Arab Socialist Union (al-Ittiḥād al-Ishtirāki Abu Lughod, Lila, 4 al-ʿArabī), 54 Abū Ṣulayb, ʿĀdil, 82, 83n23 Arab Spring, xiii, 2, 12, 22. See also revolution Abū Zaid, Mahmud, 91n29 of 2011 Account of the Manners and Customs of the ʿArafāt, ʿAlaʾuddīn, 17,64, 82 Modern Egyptians (Lane), 33 Ashour, Azmi, 51 Adīb, ʿĪmād, 214 ʿAshmāwī, Ṣāliḥ, 112 ʿĀfāq ʿArabiyya newspaper, 49–50, ʿĀshūr, Aḥmad ʿİssā, 81–82 90–91 ʿĀshūr, Majdī, 95–96, 165 agrarian sector, 6, 10, 118t; community ʿĀshūr, Sāmiḥ, 130 development associations (CDAs) in, 30f, al-Assad, Bashar, 3, 60n25 36–37; cooperatives in, 37; electoral al-Aswany, Alaa, 215 241 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00987-5 — Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information 242 Index authoritarian era: assembly president in, 60–61; Boutros Ghali, Youseef, 49 control of sacred spaces in, 23; co-optation of Brooks, Risa A., 57 parties and organizations in, 48, 50–55, Brown, Nathan J., 32, 105–6, 221 82–84; election dynamics of, 59–73; electoral Brownlee, Jason, 61, 212–13, 216 results during, 46f; executive power in, 60; Islamic movements in, 8–9, 25; Islamist electoral fortunes in, 7–8, 45–47,74, 93–120; Cai, Cexun Jeffrey, 142 leftist electoral underperformance in, 45–73, Camp David Accords, 78 156–58; legislative weakness in, 60–62; Carothers, Thomas, 165–66 Muslim Brotherhood’s participation in census of 1937,114–15 elections in, 104–20; repression of civil census of 1996, 106n10 society in, 6, 10, 22–24, 32, 76–77,205; Center Party (Ḥizb al-Wasaṭ), 132, 164t, repression of Islamist social services in, 165, 187 74–87; repression of leftist parties in, 48–50; Central Charitable Hospital (CCH) voting patterns during, 87–90. See also (al-Mustashfā al-Khayrī al-Markazī), 77–79, clientelistic networks; Mubarak, 103 Hosni charitable organizations. See social services al-ʿAwā, Muḥammad Salīm, 185–86 Chavez, Hugo, 56 ʿAwda, Muḥammad, 129 Chhibber, Pradeep, 120 ʿAwda family, 129 chlamydia trachomatis, 115–17 Ayubi, Nazih, 56 Christian Democratic Party (PAN) (Mexico), al-Azm, Sadik J., 19 159n11 al-Bāb, ʿAlī Fatḥ, 181 Chwe, Michael Suk-Young, 20 civil society, 32–39; agricultural cooperatives Badawī, ʿIzzat, 130 in, 37; clientelistic networks within, 31, Badī, Muḥammad, 52, 225 35–36, 39–42; collective organizing in, 205; Badīʿ, Muḥammad, 218 community development associations (CDAs) al-Bannā, Ḥasan, 27,80–81, 113–14; in, 36–37,39f; Islamic (religious) charitable assassination of, 219; commitment to organizations in, 34–36, 79–84, 169n29; democracy of, 223–24; on jihad, 220; labor movement in, 37–38, 39f, 150, 168–69, leadership challenge to, 165; on the system of 180, 205; private voluntary organizations in, families, 160–62; on unquestioned 37–38, 39f; regulation and repression of, 6, obedience, 159 10, 22–25, 32, 76–77,176, 205; state’s role in, Barber, Benjamin R., 21 38–39; weak networks in, 180–82. See also Bassām, Amīr, 84 connectedness; social networks; social al-Basṭawīsī, Hishām, 133 services Bayat, Asef, 25, 120 Clark, Janine, 25, 86–87,103–4 al-Bayūmī, Rifʿat, 130 clientelistic networks, 5–6, 10, 22–25, 39–42, al-Beblawi, Hazem, 225 112–13, 120; among the poor, 17–18, 71–73, Benford, Robert D., 18 87–90, 120, 131, 207,209; of the authoritarian Berman, Sheri, 21, 24, 35–36 regime, 5–6, 10, 23, 39–40, 51–52, 166, 167, al-Biblāwī, Ḥāzim, 13n 207; double dipping dynamics in, 86–87; Bilbays, 83–85, 129 impact on leftist political performance of, al-Biltāgī, Muḥammad, 52 45–73; informal mechanisms of, 84–87; with Bin-Nafīsa, Sārah, 17,64, 82 middle-class appeal, 99, 101–4; in Pakistan Bin ʿAlī, Zayn al-ʿĀbidin, 2, 3, 23 and Indonesia, 203, 204t, 209; al-Bishrī, Ṭāriq, 133, 170 post-revolutionary disruption of, 129–30, Blaydes, Lisa, 17,47,50, 59, 184, 202; of small charitable organizations, 61, 68 83–84; in urban social networks, 31. See also blindness (trachoma), 115–19 connectedness; social services Boldt, Julius, 115–16 Clinton, Hilary, 27,157–58 Bourguiba, Habib, 197 collective organizing, 205 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00987-5 — Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information Index 243 communist organizations, 29, 30f, 56, 162, Democratic Peace Party (Ḥizb al-Salām 197,198t al-Dimūqrāṭī), 46f community development associations (CDAs) Democratic Workers Party (Ḥizb al-ʿUmmāl (Jamʿiyyāt Tanmiyat al-Mujtamaʿ al-Maḥalī), al-Dimūqrāṭī), 131 36–37,39f Desai, Manali, 166 Community Party (Ḥizb al-Umma), 19, al-Dessouki, Ali al’Din Hilal, 56–57 164t development. See underdevelopment Congress for the Republic (Tunisia) Dignity Party. See al-Karāma Party (al-Muʾtamar min ajl al-Jumhūriya), 197, DiMaggio, Paul, 27 198t, 200–201 al-Dīn Ḥusayn, ʿImād, 140–41 connectedness, 5–13, 30–42, 183–206, 207–8; al-Dīn Zāyiṭ, Muḥyī, 78, 191 clientelism and, 39–40, 41f; in Indonesia, Djerejian, Edward, 215, 217 184, 202–3, 209; Islamist embeddedness in Downs, Anthony, 26 communities and, 168–69, 175–79, 194, Durkheim, Émile, 20–22 201–4, 207–8; Islamist party support and, al-Dustūr cartoon, 14–15 183–88, 205–6, 208, 210–11, 212f, 225; leftist disadvantages of, 166–69, 179–82; leftist economic platforms of parties in potential for, 208–9; leftist successes and, post-revolutionary elections, 139–47; in 183–84; mosque density and, 169–74, Tunisia, 195–96; voter perception of, 147–55, 196–202; opportunity structures of, 166–69; 174–82 in Pakistan, 184, 202–3, 209; traditional education levels, 98–100, 177t, 178 networks of, 31–42, 68–70, 107; in Tunisia, Egyptian Bloc (al-Kutla al-Miṣriyya), 132f, 184, 194–201; underdevelopment and, 207–8; 141–42 voter perceptions of economic platforms and, Egyptian Current Party (Ḥizb al-Tayār 174–82. See also social networks al-Miṣrī), 132, 163, 164t constituent assembly, 217 Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty of 1979, 78 constitutional amendments referendum, 133–35, Egyptian legislature, 60–62, 123n1 136f, 156–57,170–74 Egyptian Movement for Change (Kifāya) Constitution of 1971, 216n19 (al-Ḥaraka al-Miṣriyya min ajl Constitution of 2012, 14–15, 150, 213 al-Taghyīr), 51 cooking oil, 156–57 Egyptian Research and Training co-optation: of Islamic charitable associations, Center, 211 82–84; of leftist parties, 48, 50–55 Egyptian revolution. See revolution of 2011 coup of 1952, 33, 37,54, 59 Egyptian Social Democratic Party (al-Ḥizb coup of 2013, 4, 5, 11–12 al-Miṣrī al-Dimuqrāṭī al-ʾIjtimāʿī), 131 Covey, Stephen R., 160 Ehteshami, Anoushiravan, 56 Crescent Star Party (Indonesia), 203 Eickelman, Dale, 18n Elaguizy, Abdel Aziz, 116 ElBaradei, Mohamed, 134, 211 Darra, Usāma, 23 election dynamics: in the authoritarian era, Davis, Nancy J., 3 59–73; district-level competitiveness and, al-Daʿwa newspaper, 78 107; elite candidates in, 87–88; group feeling democracy, 217; Muslim Brotherhood’s in, 69; illiteracy rates and, 64–65, 104–5, 135, commitment to, 221–25; political pluralism 136f; judicial oversight and, 60n27,96–98, in, xiv, 11–13, 184, 205–6, 221–25; rule of 125–26, 133, 217n19; majoritarian approach law in, 13. See also post-revolutionary to, 67–71, 72t, 94–95, 111, 130–31, 202; in elections post-revolutionary elections, 129, 130–31, Democratic Forum for Labor and Liberties 170, 216n19; proportional representation (Tunisia) (al-Takattulal-Dimuqrāṭī min ajl system in, 62–67,130–31, 217n19; role of al-ʿamal wa al-ḥurriyāt), 197,198t money in, 68; ruling party guarantees in, Democratic Generation Party (Ḥizb al-Jīl 63n31, 64; under Sadat, 63; worker/farmer al-Dimūqrāṭī), 46f candidates in, 67–68, 94 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00987-5 — Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information 244 Index elections of 1945, 112–14 essentialism, 17,19 elections of 1984, 62–67,104–5 Ezz, Ahmed, 123–24, 127 elections of 1987,62n29 elections of 1990, 70, 123 Fahmī, Aḥmad, 125 elections of 2000, 94–96 family/kinship networks, 32–33, 68–71, 130–31, elections of 2005: Google searches during, 101, 159–63, 167–68, 205 102f; illiteracy rates and, 105; judicial Farāj, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Salām, 219 oversight of, 96–97; locales targeted by Farghalī, al-Badrī, 69 Muslim Brotherhood in, 106–9, 110t, 111t; Farouk, King of Egypt, 54.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Égypte\/Monde Arabe, 10
    Égypte/Monde arabe 10 | 2013 Les élections de la révolution (2011-2012) Annexes Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ema/3227 DOI : 10.4000/ema.3227 ISSN : 2090-7273 Éditeur CEDEJ - Centre d’études et de documentation économiques juridiques et sociales Édition imprimée Pagination : 307-340 ISBN : 978-2-905838-81-0 ISSN : 1110-5097 Référence électronique Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer, « Annexes », Égypte/Monde arabe [En ligne], Troisième série, Les élections de la révolution (2011-2012), mis en ligne le 11 février 2014, consulté le 20 avril 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ema/3227 ; DOI : 10.4000/ema.3227 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 20 avril 2019. © Tous droits réservés Annexes 1 Annexes Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer Les principaux partis politiques et candidats dans les élections Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer1 Les coalitions électorales Poids Nom de la Descriptif Principaux partis membres à coalition l’Ass.2 Coalition démocratique – Au départ, large alliance d’union nationale. Suite à de Alliance Liberté et Justice ; Al-Karâma ; multiples défections, la démocratique pour Ghad Al-Thawra ; Parti islamique Coalition démocratique est l’Égypte ; du Travail ; Al-Hadâra ; Parti devenu un rassemblement de 47,8 % Democratic égyptien arabe socialiste ; Parti de partis de différentes Alliance for Egypt ; la Réforme ; Parti de la tendances politiques, mais Génération démocratique clairement dominé par les اﻟﺘﺤﺎﻟﻒ Frères musulmans اﻟﺪﻳﻤﻘﺮاﻃﻲ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ Coalition
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Nadine Sika
    The Role of Political Parties in Egypt (1978-2017) and the Resilience of Authoritarianism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the Master Degree in Political Science Under the Supervision of Dr. Nadine Sika By Yasmeen Hamdy Mohamed Shaheen 900131039 Submitted to the Political Science Department The American University in Cairo 2018 Abstract 2 Abstract The current thesis focuses on the immense importance of the role of political parties in Egyptian politics and the Resilience of Authoritarianism, tracing their evolution and development from 1978 to 2017. It has proved that Egyptian political parties, in the period of the present work, have failed to consolidate democratic transformation by institutionalizing authoritarianism. This role has been so marginal that these pre- and post-Uprising political parties have been ridiculed as Ahzab Cartooniyah (Cardboard Parties). It has been found that about 100 parties out of 109 are remarkably so feeble and even paralyzed in their opposition to autocratic and dictatorial practices. Therefore, these political parties are incapable of supporting democratization. It has focused on the role of political parties in authoritarian regimes under which they further support authoritarianism. Moreover, it has analyzed the role of political parties in public mobilization as well as the variances in their organizational structures, mobilization and institutional potentials, and popular bases. The thesis has adopted the "semi-structured interviews, as a qualitative interpretive methodology, with the parties' leaders, chief members, and cadres (medium level and grassroots)". It also employs the authoritarian resilience theory for conducting this research and the comparative historical institutional approach while examining the authoritarian resilience theory to account for the failure of Egyptian political parties in democracy promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Transformations of Islamic Social Movements in Egypt – the Cases of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafist Call Between 1981-2013
    1 The Ideological Transformations of Islamic Social Movements in Egypt – The Cases of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafist Call between 1981-2013. Von der Fakultät für Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. rer. pol. genehmigte Dissertation von Obaid, Hasan aus Abha, Saudi-Arabien 1. Gutachter: PD Dr. Jochen Hippler 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Andreas Blätte Tag der Disputation: 06 Februar 2018 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. 7 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... 8 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND JUSTIFICATIONS ......................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW: CONCEPTUALIZING THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF ISLAMIC SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ................................................ 27 2.1 Essentialism .............................................................................................. 27 2.2 Contextualism ........................................................................................... 29 2.3 Political Opportunity Structure (POS) ................................................... 30 2.4 Inclusion-Exclusion Hypothesis ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5741 Kraetzschmar & Rivetti.Indd
    Islamists and the Politics of the Arab Uprisings 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd i 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd iiii 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM Islamists and the Politics of the Arab Uprisings Governance, Pluralisation and Contention Edited by Hendrik Kraetzschmar and Paola Rivetti 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd iiiiii 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutt ing-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © editorial matt er and organisation Hendrik Kraetzschmar and Paola Rivett i, 2018 © the chapters their several authors, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd Th e Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 12/1 4 Arno and Myriad by IDSUK (Dataconnection) Ltd, printed and bound in Great Britain A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 1925 3 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 1926 0 (paperback) ISBN 978 1 4744 1927 7 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 1928 4 (epub) Th e right of the cntributors to be identifi ed as authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradoxes of Political Parties in American Constitutional Development
    Prepared by Richard J. Hardy for the German-American Conference Sponsored by the Center for Civic Education Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana—March 5, 2011 The Paradoxes of Political Parties in American Constitutional Development Richard J. (Rick) Hardy Professor of Political Science Western Illinois University “No America without democracy, no democracy without politics, no politics without parties, no parties without compromise and moderation.” –Clinton Rossiter1 It is impossible to comprehend the workings of the United States constitutional system without a firm grasp of American political parties. A political party is a group of people with shared interests or principles that are organized to nominate candidates for public office in order to win elections, control government and set public policy.2 Yet, American political parties often defy simple explanations. They are complex, multi-faceted organizations with varying functions and ever- changing personnel, perspectives and positions on public policies. And attempts to analyze political parties are reminiscent of John Godfrey Saxe’s 19th century parable of the “Blind Men of Hindustan” feeling an elephant.3 One blind man felt the behemoth’s side and called it a wall, another touched its trunk and declared it a snake, while another felt a tusk and proclaimed it a spear. Like the proverbial blind men of Hindustan, close scholars of the American constitutional system often “see” political parties from different vantages. Political parties have been analyzed in terms of elections, governmental organizations, and positions on issues. Many scholars concentrate on the respective parties’ leaders, while others study their identifiers or voters at the grassroots level. Some contend that parties have become too powerful, while others believe parties need to be strengthened and more responsible.4 American citizens, too, maintain conflicting views of political parties.
    [Show full text]