Counting Islam Tarek Masoud Index More Information © in This
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Égypte\/Monde Arabe, 10
Égypte/Monde arabe 10 | 2013 Les élections de la révolution (2011-2012) Annexes Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ema/3227 DOI : 10.4000/ema.3227 ISSN : 2090-7273 Éditeur CEDEJ - Centre d’études et de documentation économiques juridiques et sociales Édition imprimée Pagination : 307-340 ISBN : 978-2-905838-81-0 ISSN : 1110-5097 Référence électronique Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer, « Annexes », Égypte/Monde arabe [En ligne], Troisième série, Les élections de la révolution (2011-2012), mis en ligne le 11 février 2014, consulté le 20 avril 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ema/3227 ; DOI : 10.4000/ema.3227 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 20 avril 2019. © Tous droits réservés Annexes 1 Annexes Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer Les principaux partis politiques et candidats dans les élections Baudouin Long et Clément Steuer1 Les coalitions électorales Poids Nom de la Descriptif Principaux partis membres à coalition l’Ass.2 Coalition démocratique – Au départ, large alliance d’union nationale. Suite à de Alliance Liberté et Justice ; Al-Karâma ; multiples défections, la démocratique pour Ghad Al-Thawra ; Parti islamique Coalition démocratique est l’Égypte ; du Travail ; Al-Hadâra ; Parti devenu un rassemblement de 47,8 % Democratic égyptien arabe socialiste ; Parti de partis de différentes Alliance for Egypt ; la Réforme ; Parti de la tendances politiques, mais Génération démocratique clairement dominé par les اﻟﺘﺤﺎﻟﻒ Frères musulmans اﻟﺪﻳﻤﻘﺮاﻃﻲ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ Coalition -
Dr. Nadine Sika
The Role of Political Parties in Egypt (1978-2017) and the Resilience of Authoritarianism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the Master Degree in Political Science Under the Supervision of Dr. Nadine Sika By Yasmeen Hamdy Mohamed Shaheen 900131039 Submitted to the Political Science Department The American University in Cairo 2018 Abstract 2 Abstract The current thesis focuses on the immense importance of the role of political parties in Egyptian politics and the Resilience of Authoritarianism, tracing their evolution and development from 1978 to 2017. It has proved that Egyptian political parties, in the period of the present work, have failed to consolidate democratic transformation by institutionalizing authoritarianism. This role has been so marginal that these pre- and post-Uprising political parties have been ridiculed as Ahzab Cartooniyah (Cardboard Parties). It has been found that about 100 parties out of 109 are remarkably so feeble and even paralyzed in their opposition to autocratic and dictatorial practices. Therefore, these political parties are incapable of supporting democratization. It has focused on the role of political parties in authoritarian regimes under which they further support authoritarianism. Moreover, it has analyzed the role of political parties in public mobilization as well as the variances in their organizational structures, mobilization and institutional potentials, and popular bases. The thesis has adopted the "semi-structured interviews, as a qualitative interpretive methodology, with the parties' leaders, chief members, and cadres (medium level and grassroots)". It also employs the authoritarian resilience theory for conducting this research and the comparative historical institutional approach while examining the authoritarian resilience theory to account for the failure of Egyptian political parties in democracy promotion. -
The Ideological Transformations of Islamic Social Movements in Egypt – the Cases of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafist Call Between 1981-2013
1 The Ideological Transformations of Islamic Social Movements in Egypt – The Cases of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafist Call between 1981-2013. Von der Fakultät für Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. rer. pol. genehmigte Dissertation von Obaid, Hasan aus Abha, Saudi-Arabien 1. Gutachter: PD Dr. Jochen Hippler 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Andreas Blätte Tag der Disputation: 06 Februar 2018 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. 7 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... 8 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND JUSTIFICATIONS ......................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW: CONCEPTUALIZING THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF ISLAMIC SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ................................................ 27 2.1 Essentialism .............................................................................................. 27 2.2 Contextualism ........................................................................................... 29 2.3 Political Opportunity Structure (POS) ................................................... 30 2.4 Inclusion-Exclusion Hypothesis .............................................................. -
5741 Kraetzschmar & Rivetti.Indd
Islamists and the Politics of the Arab Uprisings 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd i 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd iiii 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM Islamists and the Politics of the Arab Uprisings Governance, Pluralisation and Contention Edited by Hendrik Kraetzschmar and Paola Rivetti 55741_Kraetzschmar741_Kraetzschmar & RRivetti.inddivetti.indd iiiiii 005/01/185/01/18 66:47:47 PPMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutt ing-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © editorial matt er and organisation Hendrik Kraetzschmar and Paola Rivett i, 2018 © the chapters their several authors, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd Th e Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 12/1 4 Arno and Myriad by IDSUK (Dataconnection) Ltd, printed and bound in Great Britain A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 1925 3 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 1926 0 (paperback) ISBN 978 1 4744 1927 7 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 1928 4 (epub) Th e right of the cntributors to be identifi ed as authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright -
The Paradoxes of Political Parties in American Constitutional Development
Prepared by Richard J. Hardy for the German-American Conference Sponsored by the Center for Civic Education Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana—March 5, 2011 The Paradoxes of Political Parties in American Constitutional Development Richard J. (Rick) Hardy Professor of Political Science Western Illinois University “No America without democracy, no democracy without politics, no politics without parties, no parties without compromise and moderation.” –Clinton Rossiter1 It is impossible to comprehend the workings of the United States constitutional system without a firm grasp of American political parties. A political party is a group of people with shared interests or principles that are organized to nominate candidates for public office in order to win elections, control government and set public policy.2 Yet, American political parties often defy simple explanations. They are complex, multi-faceted organizations with varying functions and ever- changing personnel, perspectives and positions on public policies. And attempts to analyze political parties are reminiscent of John Godfrey Saxe’s 19th century parable of the “Blind Men of Hindustan” feeling an elephant.3 One blind man felt the behemoth’s side and called it a wall, another touched its trunk and declared it a snake, while another felt a tusk and proclaimed it a spear. Like the proverbial blind men of Hindustan, close scholars of the American constitutional system often “see” political parties from different vantages. Political parties have been analyzed in terms of elections, governmental organizations, and positions on issues. Many scholars concentrate on the respective parties’ leaders, while others study their identifiers or voters at the grassroots level. Some contend that parties have become too powerful, while others believe parties need to be strengthened and more responsible.4 American citizens, too, maintain conflicting views of political parties.