DOCSLIB.ORG

Dark Sympathy: Desiring the Other in Godwin, Coleridge, and Shelley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dark Sympathy: Desiring the Other in Godwin, Coleridge, and Shelley Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 11-15-2013 12:00 AM Dark Sympathy: Desiring the Other in Godwin, Coleridge, and Shelley Jeffrey T. King The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Tilottama Rajan The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in English A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Jeffrey T. King 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation King, Jeffrey T., "Dark Sympathy: Desiring the Other in Godwin, Coleridge, and Shelley" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1702. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1702 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DARK SYMPATHY: DESIRING THE OTHER IN GODWIN, COLERIDGE, AND SHELLEY (Thesis format: Monograph) by Jeffrey Todd King Graduate Program in English A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Jeffrey Todd King 2013 ABSTRACT Dark Sympathy: Desiring the Other in Godwin, Coleridge, and Shelley explores how Romantic writers took up and responded to eighteenth-century discourses of sympathy in the context of an increasingly influential materialist epistemology and ontology. In its formulation by David Hume and Adam Smith, sympathy plays a central role in society, using the imagination to smooth over uncertainties about the status of the self and its relation to the world that might otherwise paralyze human activity. Sympathy therefore carries a twofold purpose: on the one hand, it provides a feasible substitute for personal identity; on the other hand, it facilitates social interaction. While these ends are not incompatible in Hume’s work, given his pragmatic suspension of any overly idealistic desire, the effect of an emerging materialist discourse upon English Romantic writing is to widen the representational gap between the self and the external world. In its insistence upon a hard distinction between human ideas about the world and its potentially inaccessible true constitution, the threat of materiality conflicts with the socializing conceit of the sympathetic imagination. If sympathy is the key vehicle for social cohesion in the modern era, then “dark” sympathy recalls the rejected or unmanageable strands of desire for the other. The Romantic fascination with negative affects, anti- or counter- social thought, and limit-experiences prompts them to find means of representing these transcendent desires. Where the dissertation’s first two chapters undertake an intellectual history of sympathy and materialism, the last three chapters on William Godwin, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Mary Shelley read their works as attempting to sublimate this conflict by experimenting with forms of what Jean-Luc Nancy calls “community,” which is the bare ii relation of being-with-others uninformed by any common bond, as a substitute for the social harmony implied by sympathy. In addition to participating in the growing critical interest in the cultural and historical evolution of sympathy, Dark Sympathy attempts to contribute to the scholarship on ethics and literature by exploring the sources and figurations that have contributed to a more radical understanding of alterity. Keywords Sympathy, materiality, William Godwin, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Mary Shelley, Percy Bysshe Shelley, community, deconstruction, psychoanalysis, ethics, desire in literature iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A persistent image in this study is that of the solitary sailor adrift upon a stormy sea, desperately looking for stable ground in the chaotic face of a nascent modernity. I am deeply grateful for the family, friends, and mentors that have helped me to avoid making the metaphor my own – or have drawn me back when things began to look bleak. From the beginning of my time at Western, Prof. Tilottama Rajan and Prof. Joel Faflak have been outstanding sources of intellectual inspiration and practical wisdom. I am grateful for the guidance and advice they have given me throughout and also to have them as models for thinking about the world in a way that matters. Thanks also to the members of my examining committee, Professors Vivasvan Soni, Chris Bundock, Steven Bruhm, and Jan Plug, for encouraging, gracious, and challenging questions and suggestions that will help me to become a better scholar and will make this work stronger. On campus and off of it, members of this academic community have been endlessly helpful and supportive. Professors Chris Keep, Alison Conway, Mary Helen McMurran, and Mark McDayter have in innumerable ways ensured that my sojourn was a happy and stimulating one. Crossing paths semi-regularly with Leanne Trask, Vivian Foglton, and Beth McIntosh made life in the Department a pleasure. Friends have also been a sustaining presence in this work both for my family and myself. I am humbled to know such fine people as Sherrin Berezowsky and Patrick Hughes, Shalon and Jason Noble, David Hickey and Erica Leighton, David Drysdale, Gord Barentsen, Josh Lambier, Rebekah Lamb, Brett and Alicia Roscoe, and so many others. Special thanks to Sherrin and Shalon – co-conspirators in the “DA” (Dissertator’s Anonymous, or iv Dumbledore’s Army) group – for giving me added motivation to finish and great encouragement throughout. I am also thankful for the consistent interest and support of my friends at New London Community and, now in Edmonton, at Millcreek Christian Fellowship. Family members, both in London and elsewhere around the world, have been invaluable. Jay (Dad) and Margaret (Mom) Gurnett, Jen and Andrew (and Roger, Mirabelle, Lachlyn, and Cordelia), Nate and Sarah (and Aurora, Claire, and Walter), Dan and Meg, and Luke; Stan (Dad) and Becky (Mom) King, Ash and Pete (and Nate and Luke), Steph, and Matt: thank you for your consistent love and care for my family and me. Living with and near some of you over the last few years was a wonderful and unforgettable gift, and discussing my work with many of you has been so helpful. As paradoxical as it might sound, I could not have completed this work without the contagious curiosity, pulsating imaginations, and bottomless love of my kids: Eliot, Lucy, Annie, Moira, and Phoebe. You turned my world on its head and have given me a new and better way to live in it. I can’t wait to wander in “the wilds of literature” with you. Above all, I need to thank my best friend, inspiration, and partner-in-life: my wife, Ruth. Thank you for making it possible for me to do this (and that’s a phrase that understates the vast significance of your support almost to the point of inaccuracy). If life sometimes seems like walking around without a light (Isaiah 50:10), then I’m glad to be holding on to you as we’re guided through the dark. What an adventure! Finally, I would like to acknowledge the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, which funded this research. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... iv PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 The Emergence of Modern Sympathy ................................................................................................................. 4 Desire in Sympathy ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Framing Sympathy.................................................................................................................................................... 15 Towards a Theory of Dark Sympathy............................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 1: The Dark Side of Sympathy ......................................................................................... 30 Sources of the Conflict in Sympathy .................................................................................................................. 33 Descartes: Controlling the Outside ...................................................................................................... 34 Hobbes: Desiring Stability ....................................................................................................................... 40 The Conflict of Sympathetic Desire in Hume and Smith .......................................................................... 43 The Transcendent Impulse in David Hume ...................................................................................... 46 Adam Smith and the Social Horizon of Sympathy ......................................................................... 52 Anxiety and the Limits of Sympathetic Desire .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Select Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley
    ENGLISH CLÀSSICS The vignette, representing Shelleÿs house at Great Mar­ lou) before the late alterations, is /ro m a water- colour drawing by Dina Williams, daughter of Shelleÿs friend Edward Williams, given to the E ditor by / . Bertrand Payne, Esq., and probably made about 1840. SELECT LETTERS OF PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY RICHARD GARNETT NEW YORK D.APPLETON AND COMPANY X, 3, AND 5 BOND STREET MDCCCLXXXIII INTRODUCTION T he publication of a book in the series of which this little volume forms part, implies a claim on its behalf to a perfe&ion of form, as well as an attradiveness of subjeâ:, entitling it to the rank of a recognised English classic. This pretensión can rarely be advanced in favour of familiar letters, written in haste for the information or entertain­ ment of private friends. Such letters are frequently among the most delightful of literary compositions, but the stamp of absolute literary perfe&ion is rarely impressed upon them. The exceptions to this rule, in English literature at least, occur principally in the epistolary litera­ ture of the eighteenth century. Pope and Gray, artificial in their poetry, were not less artificial in genius to Cowper and Gray ; but would their un- their correspondence ; but while in the former premeditated utterances, from a literary point of department of composition they strove to display view, compare with the artifice of their prede­ their art, in the latter their no less successful cessors? The answer is not doubtful. Byron, endeavour was to conceal it. Together with Scott, and Kcats are excellent letter-writers, but Cowper and Walpole, they achieved the feat of their letters are far from possessing the classical imparting a literary value to ordinary topics by impress which they communicated to their poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skeptical Gothic in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0408-5 OPEN Anatomy of tragedy: the skeptical gothic in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein ✉ Veronika Ruttkay 1 ABSTRACT Combining philosophical and literary perspectives, this paper argues that Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is informed by a skeptical problematic that may be traced back to the work of the young David Hume. As the foundational text on romantic monstrosity, Fran- kenstein 1234567890():,; has been studied from various critical angles, including that of Humean skepticism by Sarah Tindal Kareem (Eighteenth-century fiction and the reinvention of wonder. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014) and Monique Morgan (Romant Net 44, doi:10.7202/ 013998ar, 2006). However, the striking connections with Hume’s Treatise have not been fully explored. The paper begins by comparing the three narrators of Frankenstein with three figures appearing in Hume’s Conclusion to Book I: the anatomist, the explorer, and the monster. It proceeds by looking at the hybrid “anatomies” offered by Hume and Shelley, suggesting that Frankenstein might be regarded as a tragic re-enactment and radicalization of Hume’s skeptical impasse. Whereas Hume alerted his readers to the dangers of a thor- oughgoing skepticism only to steer his argument in a new direction, Shelley shows those dangers realized in the “catastrophe” of the Monster’s birth. While Hume had called attention to the impossibility of conducting strictly scientific experiments on “moral subjects”, Shelley devises a counterfactual plot and a multi-layered narrative structure in order to explore that very impossibility. Interpreting Frankenstein as an instance of the “skeptical gothic”, I suggest that both the monster and the scientist (Victor) share some traits with Hume’s radically skeptical philosopher, including a tendency to give up responsibility for what Stanley Cavell (The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Shelley - Proserpine Midas: Invention, It Must Be Humbly Admitted, Does
    FDD4LLCI00ZX » Book » Mary Shelley - Proserpine Midas: Invention, It Must Be Humbly Admitted, Does... Read Doc MARY SHELLEY - PROSERPINE MIDAS: INVENTION, IT MUST BE HUMBLY ADMITTED, DOES NOT CONSIST IN CREATING OUT OF VOID, BUT OUT OF CHAOS (PAPERBACK) Stage Door, 2017. Paperback. Condition: New. Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.Mary Shelley, nee Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, was born on the 30th August 1797 in Somers Town, London, to Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin. This rich heritage from which she was born was immediately disturbed by her mothers death when she was only 10 days old. Her father remarried four years later and despite the family s impoverished circumstances, which led to home schooling by... Read PDF Mary Shelley - Proserpine Midas: Invention, It Must Be Humbly Admitted, Does Not Consist in Creating Out of Void, But Out of Chaos (Paperback) Authored by Mary Shelley Released at 2017 Filesize: 4.82 MB Reviews Completely essential study publication. Better then never, though i am quite late in start reading this one. I am very easily could get a delight of reading a composed publication. -- Marilyne Macejkovic I actually started out reading this article ebook. This is for those who statte that there had not been a worth reading. Its been developed in an extremely easy way and it is just after i finished reading this book in which in fact modified me, change the way i really believe. -- Antonetta Ritchie IV This composed publication is fantastic. I was able to comprehended everything using this composed e book. It is extremely difcult to leave it before concluding, once you begin to read the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Scroll Down the English Romantics
    Scroll Down ▼ ▼ ▼ Index To The English Romantics By Peter Landry ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ Index Aberdeen: 159; 167. Bailey, Benjamin (Friend of Abbotsford: 41. K’s): 130-2; fn#12-3, 227-8; Address to the Irish People (S’s fn#18, 228-9. work): 85. Ball, Sir Alexander (Governor Adonais (S’s work to the dead of Malta): 63. Keats): 98; 104; fn#51, 220. Barbados: 109-10. Aeschylus: 103; fn#37, 216. Basel, Switzerland: 180. Aids to Reflection (STC’s Bath: 70; 91; 93; 115; 145-6; 158; work): 76. fn#45, 219; fn#20, 236. Alastor (S’s work): 92; fn#23, 214. Bay of Spezzia: 99; 191; fn#19, 224. Albania: 166; fn#84, 248. Beaumount, Lady: 43. Alfoxden Days: 14-16; 56-8. Beaupuy, Michael (French mil- Ali Pasha: 166. itary officer befriended by Allan Bank: 21; WW moves to, WW in the early days): 6. 26-8; 69. Beddoes, Dr.: 62; 64. Allegra (A child of Claire’s & Bentham, Jeremy: 1; 67; fn#8, Lord B’s, Claire orig. called 222; fn#12, 223. her Alba, B renamed her to Beppo (Lord B’s work, 1817): 182. Allegra): 96-7; 100; 118; b., Berkeley, George (Philoso- 1817, 180-1; 190; d. at 5 yrs. pher): 68. of age, fn#24, 214; fn#33, 216; Biographia Literaria (STC’s fn#54, 242; fn#72, fn#74, 246. work): 65; 76; fn#17, 207-8; American Revolution: 110; 112. fn#19 & 22, 208; fn#26, 209; Amiens: Treaty of, 7; 24; fn#32, fn#14, 223. 201. Black Dwarf (Radical Paper of Ancient Mariner (STC’s work): the time): 112.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BYGONE BELIEFS BEING a SERIES of EXCURSIONS in the BYWAYS of THOUGHT by H. STANLEY REDGROVE Presented By
    BYGONE BELIEFS BEING A SERIES OF EXCURSIONS IN THE BYWAYS OF THOUGHT BY H. STANLEY REDGROVE Presented by: www.semantikon.com 1 _Alle Erfahrung ist Magic, und nur magisch erklarbar_. NOVALIS (Friedrich von Hardenberg). Everything possible to be believ'd is an image of truth. WILLIAM BLAKE. 2 TO MY WIFE PREFACE THESE Excursions in the Byways of Thought were undertaken at different times and on different occasions; consequently, the reader may be able to detect in them inequalities of treatment. He may feel that I have lingered too long in some byways and hurried too rapidly through others, taking, as it were, but a general view of the road in the latter case, whilst examining everything that could be seen in the former with, perhaps, undue care. As a matter of fact, how ever, all these excursions have been undertaken with one and the same object in view, that, namely, of understanding aright and appreciating at their true worth some of the more curious byways along which human thought has travelled. It is easy for the superficial thinker to dismiss much of the thought of the past (and, indeed, of the present) as _mere_ superstition, not worth the trouble of investigation: but it is not scientific. There is a reason for every belief, even the most fantastic, and it should be our object to discover this reason. How far, if at all, the reason in any case justifies us in holding a similar belief is, of course, another question. Some of the beliefs I have dealt with I have treated at greater length than others, because it seems to me that the truths of which they are the images-- vague and distorted in many cases though they be--are truths which we have either forgotten nowadays, or are in danger of forgetting.
    [Show full text]
  • Explored Countless Lab- Oratories, Interviewed a Myriad of Scientists, and Prepared Thousands of News Releases, Feature Articles, Web Sites, and Multimedia Packages
    Explaining Research This page intentionally left blank Explaining Research How to Reach Key Audiences to Advance Your Work Dennis Meredith 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Dennis Meredith Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meredith, Dennis. Explaining research : how to reach key audiences to advance your work / Dennis Meredith. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-973205-0 (pbk.) 1. Communication in science. 2. Research. I. Title. Q223.M399 2010 507.2–dc22 2009031328 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To my mother, Mary Gurvis Meredith. She gave me the words. This page intentionally left blank You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother.
    [Show full text]
  • 154 Keats-Shelley Journal
    154 Keats-Shelley Journal Hebron concludes that the Shelley papers “could not be so shaped, or confined to a single, judicious impression” (pp. 13, 25). Shelley’s Ghost carefully recounts the various endeavors to rewrite the family history posthumously by those refashion- ing the past to serve the descendants’ own individual interests. Denlinger, the curator of the Pforzheimer Collection of Shelley and His Circle, has contributed an excellent chapter on Shelley’s manuscripts outside the Bodleian that recounts the global dispersal of different Shelley-circle manu- scripts. In observing that “Shelley’s ghost, in its papery forms, has given rise to a number of stories, some amusing, some chilling,” Denlinger admits to focusing “shamelessly” on the more interesting tales, particularly those surrounding the two copies of Queen Mab, the Scrope Davies Notebook, the Silsbee Notebooks, and the Esdaile Notebook (p. 163). These detailed, well-researched accounts make for fascinating reading as they reveal the exciting mysteries behind docu- ments in collections beyond the Bodleian. Hebron and Denlinger introduce their readers to a cast of variegated char- acters whose specters, like the ghost of the book’s title, flit hauntingly in and out of the story. While I have only one complaint about this stellar book, a disconcerting error in one chapter’s numbering of the endnotes, the splendid Shelley’s Ghost should help ensure that the Shelley family “legacy” will forever be “secured” (p. 181). North Carolina State University Sharon L. Joffe Mary Shelley: Her Circle and Her Contemporaries. Edited by L. Adam Mekler and Lucy Morrison. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publish- ing, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and His Children: a Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonz
    ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his Children: A Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonzalez, Ph.D. Chairperson: Stephen Prickett, Ph.D. The children of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Hartley, Derwent, and Sara, have received limited scholarly attention, though all were important nineteenth century figures. Lack of scholarly attention on them can be blamed on their father, who has so overshadowed his children that their value has been relegated to what they can reveal about him, the literary genius. Scholars who have studied the children for these purposes all assume familial ties justify their basic premise, that Coleridge can be understood by examining the children he raised. But in this case, the assumption is false; Coleridge had little interaction with his children overall, and the task of raising them was left to their mother, Sara, her sister Edith, and Edith’s husband, Robert Southey. While studies of S. T. C.’s children that seek to provide information about him are fruitless, more productive scholarly work can be done examining the lives and contributions of Hartley, Derwent, and Sara to their age. This dissertation is a starting point for reinvestigating Coleridge’s children and analyzes their life and work. Taken out from under the shadow of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, we find that Hartley was not doomed to be a “child of romanticism” as a result of his father’s experimental approach to his education; rather, he chose this persona for himself. Conversely, Derwent is the black sheep of the family and consciously chooses not to undertake the family profession, writing poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam's Response to the Challenges of Religious Pluralism
    ISLAM'S RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGES OF RELIGIOUS PLURALISM ABSTRACT THESIS SUB^H]TED ROH JjMkAWAB^XjP THE DEGREE OF Bottor of $t)tlos;opt)p IN ^ <^- ISLAMIC STUDIES \^<- BY ARSHAa AHMAD SALROO Under the Supervision of DR. ABDUL MAJID KHAN DEPARTMENT OF ISLAMIC STUDIES AUGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALfGARH (INDIA) 2006 Abstract Abstract The Islamic response to the challenge of Religious Pluralism can be properly understood with reference to its general perspective on human society, and the mutual respect and regard for differences of views. It recognizes and respects the sanctity of freedom of thought and action. The pluralism is a concept that was initially coined by English Philosophers, like Christian Woljf (1679-1754) and Immanuel Kant They projected it as a doctrine about the plentitude of possible world-views combined with the invitation to adopt llic iiiii\crsal view-point of a world citizen. In the present day philosophy, it refers to a standpoint that the world may be interpreted in several ways. It is purported to be a science that involves evaluation, which is enhanced by competitions between several interpretations. In ethics and in normative sociology, it refers to the problem that modern society is no longer based on an authoritative set of norms, leaving all ethical questions in the terminology of Jurgen Habermas, subject to open-ended and rational discourse. Pluralism is thought not to mean only the physical proximity of the people of diverse creeds and ethnic origin. It implies interaction on both the individual and collective planes. At the individual level friction is not necessarily eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennyson's Poems
    Tennyson’s Poems New Textual Parallels R. H. WINNICK To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. TENNYSON’S POEMS: NEW TEXTUAL PARALLELS Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels R. H. Winnick https://www.openbookpublishers.com Copyright © 2019 by R. H. Winnick This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work provided that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way which suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: R. H. Winnick, Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2019. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0161 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Aam Aadmi 12 Dr
    MORPARIA’S PAGE E-mail: [email protected] Contents FEBRUARY 2014 VOL.17/7 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ THEME: Morparia’s page 2 The Comman Man The Common Man Speaks 5 V Gangadhar The Common Man is surging 6 Managing editor Prof. Yogesh Atal Mrs. Sucharita R. Hegde The ubiquitous ‘Common Man’ of India 8 P. Radhakrishnan Editor R.K Laxman: An Uncommon Common Man 10 Anuradha Dhareshwar V. Gangadhar The rise of the Aam Aadmi 12 Dr. Bhalchandra K. Kango Sub editor Right to Information – path to Swaraj 14 Sonam Saigal Shailesh Gandhi Aam Aadmi crusaders Design 6 Baba Amte 16 H. V. Shiv Shankar Adv. Varsha Deshpande 18 Rajendra Singh 19 Marketing Dr. Anil Joshi 20 Mahesh Kanojia Adv. M. C. Mehta 21 Anna Hazare 22 OIOP Clubs Know India Better Vaibhav Palkar How Beautiful is My Valley 23 Gustasp and Jeroo Irani Face to face: Shashi Deshpande 36 Subscription Features Nagesh Bangera Youth Voice - Urvish Mehta 40 Will Aam Aadmi Party survive as a National Party? 41 Prof. P M Kamath Advisory board 23 M V Kamath Khobragade episode triggers a much needed Sucharita Hegde correction 43 Justice S Radhakrishnan Dr. B. Ramesh Babu Venkat R Chary A memorable day 46 Lt. General Vijay Oberoi Printed & Published by Cultural Kaleidoscope 48 Mrs. Sucharita R. Hegde for Navigation in ancient India and social taboo One India One People Foundation, against overseas travel 50 Mahalaxmi Chambers, 4th floor, B.M.N. Murthy 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Columns 52 Mumbai - 400 026 Nature watch : Bittu Sahgal Tel: 022-2353 4400 Infocus : C. V. Aravind Fax: 022-2351 7544 36 Young India 54 e-mail: [email protected] / Shashi Deshpande Great Indians 56 [email protected] Printed at: Graphtone (India) Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • LAWRENCE-DISSERTATION.Pdf (1.207Mb)
    RIDING WAVES OF DISSENT: COUNTER-IMPERIAL IMPULSES IN THE AGE OF FULLER AND MELVILLE A Dissertation by NICHOLAS M. LAWRENCE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2009 Major Subject: English RIDING WAVES OF DISSENT: COUNTER-IMPERIAL IMPULSES IN THE AGE OF FULLER AND MELVILLE A Dissertation by NICHOLAS M. LAWRENCE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Larry J. Reynolds Committee Members, Dennis Berthold M. Jimmie Killingsworth John H. Lenihan Head of Department, M. Jimmie Killingsworth August 2009 Major Subject: English iii ABSTRACT Riding Waves of Dissent: Counter-Imperial Impulses in the Age of Fuller and Melville. (August 2009) Nicholas M. Lawrence, B.A., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; M.A., Western Carolina University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Larry J. Reynolds This dissertation examines the interplay between antebellum frontier literature and the counter-imperial impulses that impelled the era‟s political, cultural, and literary developments. Focusing on selected works by James Fenimore Cooper, Margaret Fuller, Francis Parkman, and Herman Melville, I use historicist methods to reveal how these authors drew upon and contributed to a strong and widespread, though ultimately unsuccessful, resistance to the discourse of Manifest Destiny that now identifies the age. For all their important differences, each of the frontier writings I examine reflects the presence of a culturally-pervasive anxiety over issues such as environmental depletion, slavery, Indian removal, and expansion‟s impact on the character of a nation ostensibly founded on republican, anti-imperialist principles.
    [Show full text]