DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Open Space Acquisition Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Comprehensive Open Space Acquisition Strategy 2016-2020 Green Plan Dannel P. Malloy, Governor State of Connecticut Robert J. Klee, Commissioner Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep/openspace www.ct.gov/deep/greenplan Front Cover: Winners of the 1st Annual Open Space and Watershed Land Acquisition photo contest held in 2017 by the Connecticut Land Conservation Council, in partnership with the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Each photo was taken on land protected under a State open space grant. Photos clockwise from top-left: Robert Pagini, Autumnal Mountain Sunrise David Heg, Lower Falls at Mukluk Vikkie Reski, Hawk Hill Farm Dale Bertoldi, Greens Farm at Lisa Lane The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer that is committed to complying with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact us at (860) 418-5910 or [email protected] if you: have a disability and need a communication aid or service; have limited proficiency in English and may need information in another language; or if you wish to file an ADA or Title VI discrimination complaint. Acknowledgements The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) wishes to thank members of the following organizations who generously donated their time to participate in advisory and outreach meetings in response to DEEP’s requests for comments and guidance in preparing this state planning document: The Audubon Connecticut and Connecticut Audubon Societies, Connecticut Farmland Trust, Connecticut Forest and Park Association, Connecticut Land Conservation Council, State Natural Heritage and Open Space Land Acquisition Review Board, and The Nature Conservancy. The editors also wish to thank many employees at DEEP, the State Office of Policy and Management, the Department of Public Health, and the Council on Environmental Quality for their guidance and contributions. Last but not least, DEEP gives thanks to Connecticut’s land trusts and other conservation-minded organizations who work passionately to protect the state’s special places. Executive Summary The Connecticut Comprehensive Open Space Acquisition Strategy (Green Plan) is a statewide planning document developed by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) in partnership with municipalities and numerous conservation organizations to guide land acquisitions towards achieving the state’s open space goal. This version of the Green Plan presents a coordinated approach for land conservation by the State of Connecticut, through DEEP and its conservation partners (municipalities, land conservation organizations, and water companies – known collectively as DEEP’s Partners). Integral to this plan is a 5-Year Action Strategy meant to unify the efforts of all conservation actors. This action-oriented framework covers the period of time from the end of the previous plan through 2020. Implementation of this 5-Year Action Strategy and the supporting materials of the Green Plan by DEEP and its Partners will greatly advance land conservation in Connecticut. Section 23-8b of the Connecticut General Statutes set a goal of conserving 21%, or 673,210 acres, of Connecticut’s land base as open space by year 2023. Of this, the statute states that the State shall acquire 10% and its Partners shall acquire 11%: As of December 31, 2015, an estimated 501,330 acres were held as open space in Connecticut, or 74.5% of the total open space goal. DEEP and its Partners must acquire or protect an additional 62,960 acres and 108,920 acres as open space, respectively, to reach their target goals. | i While progress has been made over the decades on preserving open space, lands of high conservation and recreation value continue to be lost to development, even with the current economic conditions. Conservation lands increase greatly in value when they are interconnected with other conservation lands. One parcel of land lost to development at a critical junction can diminish the conservation and recreation value of surrounding lands. The State of Connecticut in partnership with many municipalities, regional councils of government, and private developers are working to focus development in areas of existing infrastructure, including areas with access to water, sewer, reliable energy, and transit. There has been significant investment in this regard in recent years. In order to protect and increase the value of the land DEEP and its Partners have already protected, an increase in land conservation in the most critical locations is needed. This investment will secure the future of Connecticut’s natural heritage, its rural landscape, its abundance of recreational resources, its high-quality waters, and its strong communities. To meet the needs and address the issues facing the State’s residents and environmental resources, the Green Plan: Discusses the purpose of, need for, and threats to open space conservation; Provides an estimate of the area of land protected as open space by the State and its Partners; Discusses a system for increasing the accuracy of statewide open space data; Describes the highest priorities for acquisition of lands identified to be in greatest need for immediate preservation and the general location of each priority; Provides timetables for the acquisition of land by the State and plans for management of such land; and Lists resources to be used for open space acquisition and management in Connecticut. This new Green Plan should enhance open space acquisition efforts and outcomes through the implementation of a set of acquisition target goals and programmatic objectives. Specifically, the State’s efforts to acquire certain lands for public use and benefit are dedicated to the following themes: Natural Waters and Drinking Water Resources; Areas Significant to the Coast; Natural Heritage Resources; Natural Resource-based Outdoor Recreation | ii In addition to these priorities, DEEP and its Partners seek to increase acquisitions and provide all people with sufficient proximity to accessible open space through the following program administration themes: Strategize Acquisitions for Climate Change Resiliency; Build Partnerships and Public Support for Open Space; Improve Open Space Data and Tools; Develop Strategies for Preserving in Perpetuity State Lands of High Conservation Value; Optimize State Acquisition and Grant Program Operations. Over the next five years, the Green Plan calls for an open space acquisition target of 11,500 acres as open space: 5,550 acres to be acquired by DEEP and 5,950 acres to be acquired by its Partners: Green Plan Open Space Protection Targets through 2020 Target DEEP Acquisitions Partner Acquisitions Open Space Priority Acres (Acres) (Acres) Natural Waters and 1,500 3,500 5,000 Drinking Water Resources (30% of Total) (70% of Total) 300 700 Significant Coastal Areas 1,000 (30% of Total) (70% of Total) 750 250 Natural Heritage Resources 1,000 (75% of Total) (25% of Total) 500 1,500 Outdoor Recreational Trails 2,000 (50% of Total) (50% of Total) Other Recreation and Natural 2,500 0 2,500 Resource Lands Held by DEEP (100% of Total) Totals 11,500 5,550 5,950 These targets require greater investment by DEEP and its Partners than has occurred in the recent past. Even with this level of investment, DEEP and its Partners will not meet the State’s overall open space goals by 2023. Regardless of the degree of resources that are provided for land conservation, DEEP and its Partners must focus on targeting the highest-value conservation and recreation lands for open space preservation. It is anticipated that with the new, focused, and collaborative efforts of this Green Plan, outcomes will increase. | iii Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv 5-year Action Strategy to Achieve Connecticut’s Open Space Goal ............................................. 1 Land Acquisition Priorities ......................................................................................................... 6 A. Natural Waters & Drinking Water Resources ................................................................... 7 B. Areas Significant to the Coast ......................................................................................... 13 C. Natural Heritage Resources ............................................................................................. 17 D. Natural Resource-based Outdoor Recreation .................................................................. 21 Program Administration Priorities ............................................................................................ 24 1. Strategize Acquisitions for Climate Change Resiliency .................................................. 25 2. Build Partnerships and Public Support for Open Space .................................................. 27 3. Improve Open Space Data and Tools .............................................................................. 36 4. Develop Strategies for Preserving in Perpetuity State-owned Lands of High Conservation Value ..............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement

    Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement

    Testimony of Eric Hammerling, Executive Director, Connecticut Forest & Park Association Public Hearing Subject Matter Position Raised Bill 5477 : AN ACT ESTABLISHING A TAX ABATEMENT FOR Support CERTAIN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS . Raised Bill 5476: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A STATE -WIDE GEOGRAPHIC Support INFORMATION SYSTEM TASK FORCE . The Connecticut Forest & Park Association (CFPA) is the first conservation organization estab lished in Connecticut in 1895. For 12 5 years, CFPA has offered testimony before the General Assembly on various State Park and Forest, trail recreation, forestry, and land conservation iss ues. I am pleased to testify today to express CFPA’s support of Raised Bill 5477 , “An Act Establishing a Tax Abatement for Certain Conservation Easements .” What would this bill do (in plain language)? This bill would enable, but not require, muni cipalitie s to pass a local ordinance to waive property taxes for landowners who place a conservation easement on a portion of their property to protect the trail corridor of a State - designated Greenway . This would be a n outstanding way to support municipalities in encourag ing landowners to protect these speci al ly designated corridors in perpetuity fo r public use and enjoyment . Why is a tax abatement for Greenways both critical and urgent ? Greenw ays are designated by the state (C.G.S. Section 23 -10 2(b) ) as noteworthy recreational resources, and an incentive is needed to keep these trails intact for future generations. State -designa ted Greenways typic ally stretch across multiple properties owned by a patchwork of private, municipal, and state landowners. The loss of just one section of trail on one property can sever corridor conti nuity along a Greenway, and trails on private lands are the most vulnerable.
  • Chapter 6 Bicycle and Pedestrian

    Chapter 6 Bicycle and Pedestrian

    CHAPTER 6 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES This chapter is a compilation of all bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Connecticut. The maps shown in this chapter will give the reader a perspective of where Connecticut's program is today and a view of where it may go with respect to a comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian system. Trails in Connecticut are designed with connectivity in mind, and are proposed with an interconnected system as the ultimate goal. These maps are to be used, by ConnDOT, to evaluate the suitability of accommodating walkers and bicyclists and to integrate the consideration of sidewalks and multi - use paths into all planning, design, construction and maintenance activities. This chapter is divided into four parts; existing and program facilities, proposed long range plans, greenways and the existing Bike Routes on the Connecticut Bicycle Map. 107 108 EXISTING AND PROGRAMED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The general location of the 74 major existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities and enhancement projects described in this section are shown in Figure 49. These facilities were developed by ConnDOT, ConnDEP and local communities. While the majority of these facilities are separate multi-use paths, several are signed bike lane routes that were developed along existing roads in the 1970's. Various funding sources were used in their construction including the use of Interstate funds in conjunction with major projects, local funds, National Recreational Trails funds, enhancement funds and state bond money. The following is a description of these facilities. A series of route maps showing several of these facilities is shown in Appendix A.
  • Danielson Airport (LZD)

    Danielson Airport (LZD)

    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Danielson Airport (LZD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 May 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Danielson Airport (LZD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 5/17/2017 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
  • Town of Oxford Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, 2014

    Town of Oxford Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, 2014

    TOWN OF OXFORD NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE, 2014 Original Plan Adopted October 30, 2006 Plan Update Prepared February 24, 2014 Plan Update Adopted July 2, 2014 MMI #1452-11 Prepared for the: TOWN OF OXFORD, CONNECTICUT Emergency Services Department Oxford Town Hall 486 Oxford Road Oxford, CT 06478-1298 (203) 888-9090 www.oxford-ct.gov The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds provided by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection under a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Town of Oxford and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. The report does not constitute a specification or regulation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 99 Realty Drive Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 (203) 271-1773 www.miloneandmacbroom.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CONTACT INFORMATION This plan update was prepared under the direction of the Town of Oxford. The following individual should be contacted with questions or comments regarding the plan: Chief Scott Pelletier Emergency Management Director, Local Coordinator Emergency Services Department Town of Oxford 486 Oxford Road Oxford, CT 06478-1298 (203) 888-9090 Phone (203) 888-2136 Fax [email protected] This Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update could not have been completed without the time and dedication of the additional following individuals at the local level: Mr. George Temple, First Selectman Ms. Anna Rycenga, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. Wayne Watt, Director of Public Works Ms. Kathleen O’Neill, Grant Administrator Mr. Andrew Ferrillo, Inland Wetlands Officer Mr.
  • HVCEO Regional Bike Plan

    HVCEO Regional Bike Plan

    January 2015 PREPARED FOR: HVCEO Housatonic Valley Council of Elected O f f i c i a l s BY: HARTransit GREATER DANBURY REGIONAL BIKE PLAN FINAL REPORT January 2015 This document was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation or the Federal Transit Administration. Prepared for HVCEO by Eric C. Bergstraesser, Chief Executive Officer Report Staff Richard A. Schreiner, Director of Service Development Stephanie A. Scavelli, Transportation Planner Andrew C. O’Connell, Marketing and Public Relations Coordinator George Blake, HVCEO Geographic Information Systems Manager ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the following people for their expertise, invaluable support, and generous assistance on the development of this project. Apologies extended for any omissions: Betty Brosius Jonathan Chew Jacqui Dowd Dave and Marti Fine Sandy Fry Francisco Gomes (Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc.) Stuart Green Lukas Herbert Alex Karman Amy Mangold Tom O’Brien Sharon Okoye David Pattee John Pilner Katherine Rattan Paul Roche Cover Photo: A sharrow marking on the pavement alerts drivers to a designated shared roadway along Housatonic Avenue in New Milford, CT. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 OVERVIEW AND POLICY OBJECTIVES …………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction ……...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Relevant Federal and State of Connecticut Programs and Policies …….. 4 1.3 Demographics …………………………………………………………... 8 1.4 Bicycle Crash Data ……………………………………………………... 10 1.5 Special Concerns in Bicycle Planning …….............................................. 15 2 INVENTORY OF ROUTES AND PLANS ……………………………..
  • AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Waterbury-Oxford Airport

    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Waterbury-Oxford Airport

    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Waterbury-Oxford Airport Prepared for: Business Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT
  • Greenwaysmap2019pdf.Pdf

    Greenwaysmap2019pdf.Pdf

    North Canaan 9 5 Colebrook Hartland 5 8 Suffield Somers Union Salisbury Stafford Norfolk Enfield Thompson µ y Woodstock Granby b 59 Canaan n a r 1 G 8 t 7 1 Barkhamsted s a Windsor Locks Ellington 2 Winchester E 8 or s n Putnam ind 4 Explanation o t W t 3 s 0 E Ea g a 7 n Ashford i s l l t 9 i Major Highways Tolland f Windsor 2 o n 5 Simsbury W r B 1 2 Pomfret o d t l o 3 7 Sharon n 3 Greenways o 6 0 9 a 6 1 Cornwall Goshen 1 m 2 C r 3 o 2 f ds 7 i in Existing Torrington New Hartford 2 e W Killingly l th d Sou Vernon 6 9 4 6 C 2 6 2019 Designated 1 h n a E W 4 o 5 p t a l e 6 p Avon Mansfield i Brooklyn s B n Clinton Blueway s d t Coventry m r o t r ste H e h a c l H o n 6 a t f M o a H a t 5 r r n Clinton Greenway r 5 Burlington t t a f 2 Harwinton f 7 o r o H 1 3 r e r Warren Litchfield d d v 0 Blue Blazed Hiking Trails o 7 Kent d g Farmington n S n 7 i N A c 5 3 l r Metacomet Ridge System o 2 e 8 a 4 i Windham e t n t w i b l 75 a Plainfield 0 Wethersfield S a i m n t n 6 i Glastonbury u Morris d r g l h o t Bristol B t 4 Pla o C u in v n ill w Thomaston o e e ll Canterbury 4 i M m 6 Washington N H Hebron 3 1 4 Notes: y y 4 a l ck W 5 r 4 o 5 P l R b S n p 1 Bethle a i The Blue Blazed Hiking Trail System hem o l ra t 1 g e r Lebanon k u o e 2 r n t u E and the Metacomet Ridge System o a 6 6 g n Cro r w m a S Southington w Berlin h o V 7 ell F Wolcott s n 1 b h New Milford o t are designated Greenways.
  • Real Estate Listing by County

    Real Estate Listing by County

    County Town Listing Quote Realtor Phone Email Located across the street from Wolfpit's Nature Preserve with over 40 acres of woodlands for Fairfield Bethel 76 Wolfpits Road Daniel Radmanovic (917) 257-4119 [email protected] added privacy. 8 Obtuse Road Brookfield has over 1,300 acres of Protected Open Space incl private land trusts. Just ½ mile down Fairfield Brookfield Kellie Martone (203) 948-1034 [email protected] North the rd from your new home are hiking trails, some leading to Lake Lillinonah. The house is close to three picturesque reservoirs (East Lake, Padanaram, and Marjorie), as well Fairfield Danbury 5 Dana Road Kris Lippi (860) 595-2506 as Bear Mt. Reservation, which are great places to run, walk, and hike. Magnificent custom built home on 8.74 sprawling acres private and adjacent to a nature preserve. Fairfield Danbury 113 King Street Vanessa Savio (203) 622-1100 [email protected] Enjoy the rolling mountains as the backdrop to your impeccably built 5000 sq ft plus home. NEWLY RENOVATED COLONIAL ON DESIRED CUL-DE-SAC CLOSE TO ELEMENTARY Sheree Frank & Doug Fairfield Darien 4 Heather Lane (203) 655-8238 SCHOOL AND LAND TRUST PRESERVE. Milne Fairfield Darien 123 Tokeneke Road The abutting land trust property allows you to enjoy endless privacy Lynne Somerville (508) 934-7288 Fairfield Darien 73 Locust Hill Road Sited adjacent to land trust, the lovely back yard offers privacy Hannah Driscoll (508) 934-7288 418 Morehouse Fairfield Easton Perfectly located close to the walking trails of Aspetuck Land Trust. Hannah Driscoll (508) 934-7288 Road Fairfield Easton 45 Wyldewood Road On cul-de-sac with trails through Aspetuck Land Trust.
  • Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study: Overview

    Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study: Overview

    Regional Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study Table of Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................... 5 2. Mission and Goals ..................................................................................... 7 3. Study Methodology .................................................................................... 8 4. Study Area .............................................................................................. 9 5. Potential Greenway Routing Analysis ............................................................ 12 6. Obstacles to Access and Connectivity (Gap Analysis) ......................................... 18 7. Affected Property Data ............................................................................ 20 8. General Construction Feasibility and Cost ...................................................... 21 9. Brownfields and Environmental Constraints .................................................... 22 10. Safety and Security ................................................................................ 23 11. Permitting Issues .................................................................................. 24 12. Coordination with Other Studies ................................................................ 27 13. Community Input .................................................................................. 30 14. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................... 31 15. Recommended
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan Update OXFORD, CT

    Hazard Mitigation Plan Update OXFORD, CT

    Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 – 2026 Municipal Annex for OXFORD, CT 486 Oxford Road Oxford, CT 06478 MMI #3211-29 Prepared for: Prepared by: NAUGATUCK VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS SLR CONSULTING 47 Leavenworth Street, 3rd Floor 99 Realty Drive Waterbury, CT 06702 Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 (203) 489-0362 (203) 271-1773 www.nvcogct.org www.slrconsulting.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE OF ANNEX .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 PHYSICAL SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 LAND COVER ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.5 GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.6 CLIMATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE .................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.7 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ...............................................................................................................................
  • Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments

    Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments

    Regional Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study Table of Contents 1. Overview ................................................................................................ 3 2. Mission and Goals ..................................................................................... 5 3. Study Methodology .................................................................................... 6 4. Study Area .............................................................................................. 7 5. Potential Greenway Routing Analysis .............................................................. 8 6. Obstacles to Access and Connectivity (Gap Analysis) ......................................... 11 7. Affected Property Data ............................................................................ 11 8. General Construction Feasibility and Cost ...................................................... 11 9. Brownfields and Environmental Constraints .................................................... 12 10. Safety and Security ................................................................................ 13 11. Permitting Issues .................................................................................. 14 12. Coordination with Other Studies ................................................................ 17 13. Community Input .................................................................................. 19 14. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................... 20 15. Recommended
  • Appendix E.10 Visual and Aesthetic Resoruces

    Appendix E.10 Visual and Aesthetic Resoruces

    Appendix E.10 Visual and Aesthetic Resources Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 2 APPENDIX E.10 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES – ERRATA SHEET No changes were made to the materials in this appendix. This Volume 2 file contains the same information as was presented in the Tier 1 Draft EIS published November 2015. Tier 1 Final EIS P a g e | 1 Volume 2 Visual and Aesthetic Resource Methodology February 27, 2014 Final Submitted by: Visual and Aesthetic Resource Methodology Table of Contents 1. VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 RELATED RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 AGENCY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4.1 Regulatory Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 EFFECTS METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.5.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................................................