State Parks and Forests: Funding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Parks and Forests: Funding Staff Findings and Recommendations State Parks and Forests: Funding January 23, 2014 Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee Connecticut General Assembly 2013-2014 Committee Members Senate House John A. Kissel, Co-Chair Mary M. Mushinsky, Co-Chair John W. Fonfara Christie M. Carpino Steve Cassano Brian Becker Eric D. Coleman Marilyn Giuliano Anthony Guglielmo Brenda L. Kupchick Joe Markley Diana S. Urban Committee Staff on Project Brian Beisel, Principal Analyst Eric Michael Gray, Associate Legislative Analyst Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee Connecticut General Assembly State Capitol Room 506 Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0300 www.cga.ct.gov/pri/index.asp [email protected] PRI Staff Findings and Recommendations Highlights January 2014 State Parks and Forests: Funding Background Main Staff Findings In June 2013, the program review The Parks Division FY 13 budget expenditure level is comparable to committee authorized a study of the level of FY 06 using constant 2013 dollars. Although several funding Connecticut’s state parks and forests. The sources exist, the system has become heavily reliant on the state’s study focuses on funding of the state park General Fund, with little directive or incentive to focus on revenue system, including a comparison of generating activities. revenues and expenditures within the park system and an assessment of the Connecticut’s state park fees are at or above other states in the adequacy of funding to support short- and region. There has been a decrease in paid attendance following fee long-term operational needs. increases in FY 10. The percentage of use by residents (~80% of day use) was not impacted by the fee increase. State parks were first established in Connecticut 100 years ago, under the Staffing levels are down and have reached a critical point regarding supervision of the State Park Commission. operations. Several management units do not have permanent, full-time Now under the Department of Energy and supervisors. Connecticut’s use of seasonal workers exceeds the national Environmental Protection (DEEP), there average. are 139 state parks and forests (255,000 acres) providing public outdoor recreation Planning for the state park system has defaulted to “crisis areas in the state. While several divisions management” as the level of resources available to parks has decreased. and bureaus within DEEP are involved in Though there is some collection of data, information is not analyzed and parks, park operations are handled within park performance is not measured in meaningful ways to fully inform the State Parks and Public Outreach planning and resource allocation. Division (Parks Division) by a combination of park supervisors, maintainers, and Either an increase in funding and staffing or a decrease in services is seasonal employees. necessary for continued adequate state park operations in the long- term. It is possible the current service offerings can be maintained with The state park season runs from Memorial new, lower levels of staffing and funding for a short while longer. However, Day to Labor Day, though park operations it is unlikely the current situation can be maintained indefinitely as the extend beyond these months. During the current balance relies on deferring maintenance, which may lead to season, 35 (of 139) parks charge fees for increased future costs. parking, admission, or camping. Fee levels are set by regulation and can vary by PRI Staff Recommendations location, residency status, and time of day. The last fee change occurred in 2010. Staff makes recommendations throughout the report in support of the key Prior to FY 10, a portion of the revenues improvement areas mentioned here. In order to enhance planning efforts, from collection of park fees was used by the Parks Division should perform regular reviews of all park the Parks Division through a non-lapsing resources and annually track park performance through the special fund. Since FY 10, park-generated development of a Results Based Accountability report card. revenues have gone to the General Fund. Specific recommendations contribute to the recommended reviews and Committee staff used a variety of data report card, including requiring measurement of three key areas: collection methods to conduct the study, attendance, safety, and customer satisfaction. The major aspects of including a review of financial and individual parks to be considered during each park review are: staffing informational documentation provided by needs; the use and level of fees; and the condition of existing facilities. DEEP and interviews with DEEP staff as well as knowledgeable persons and A portion of park-generated revenues should be appropriated to the interested parties outside of DEEP. Parks Division, contingent upon demonstration of park performance Nationwide state parks comparison data through the RBA process. The division must develop a plan for use and were reviewed and selected other states distribution of this increased funding. Any appropriated park-generated were interviewed. revenue should not supplant existing General Fund monies. Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee Staff Office State Capitol * 210 Capitol Avenue * Room 506 * Hartford, CT 06106-1591 P: (860) 240-0300 * F: (860) 240-0327 * E-mail: [email protected] Acronyms AIX National Association of State Park Directors Annual Information Exchange ATV All Terrain Vehicle BESB Bureau of Education and Services for the Blind BOR Bureau of Outdoor Recreation DCS Department of Construction Services DEEP Department of Energy and Environmental Protection EC Fund Environmental Conservation Fund EnCon Environmental Conservation Police Division FTE Full-time equivalent OFA Legislative Office of Fiscal Analysis PRC DEEP’s Project Review Committee RBA Results Based Accountability RTP Recreation Trails Program SCORP State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Executive Summary State Parks and Forests: Funding In 2013, Connecticut celebrated the hundredth anniversary of its state parks. Under the governance of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEEP), Connecticut’s state park system consists of 107 parks and 32 forests covering over 255,000 acres. The purpose of state parks is to provide: outdoor recreation, including hiking, biking, boating, fishing, swimming, picnicking, and camping; protection of natural areas; and educational opportunities and programs. In June 2013, the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee authorized a study of state parks and forests. Specifically, the study focused on funding for state parks and forests and whether it is “adequate” to support short- and long-term operational needs. The committee formally adopted the study scope on September 26, 2013.1 Within this report, committee staff provides information and analysis of resource trends for state parks, including expenditures (operational and capital), revenue, and staffing. To further help determine whether resources are adequate, the study examined three metrics of park use: attendance, safety, and customer satisfaction; additional information and analysis of park system performance measurement and planning are provided. Although this report examines funding for state parks and makes conclusions on resource levels, ultimately, the determination of whether state park funding is adequate is a public policy decision. Connecticut’s state park system provides a wide range of recreational services for residents and non-residents while also protecting the state’s natural resources and heritage. The system is a network of land types and involves different programs across several bureaus within the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection for its overall operation. To keep the study scope manageable, and still allow for proper examination of state park system funding, a comprehensive review of the department’s State Parks and Public Outreach Division (Parks Division) was made. The division has primary responsibility within DEEP for the operation of state parks, which is accomplished through a system of central and field-level programs. Overall, committee staff found funding for state parks steadily increased during FYs 05- 10, but has been on a downward trend since then. The funding level for FY 13, adjusted for inflation, is slightly below the FY 06 level. Connecticut is also more reliant on general fund support than most other states. Conversely, almost all other states have funding mechanisms allowing them to retain either all or a portion of the revenue they generate within their systems of state parks. Connecticut law currently allows some parks to retain revenues from renting facilities in special accounts, but the revenue generated through parking, admission, and camping fees – which is the vast majority of revenue – goes to the state’s General Fund. 1 The Connecticut state park system includes parks and forests. The remainder of this report will use the term “parks” to refer collectively to parks and forests. Program Review and Investigations Committee Staff Findings and Recommendations: January 23, 2014 i Staffing levels within the park system are down since FY 08. Decreases in key field personnel, namely park maintainers and supervisors, have occurred generally since FY 09. This has resulted in some park management areas with maintenance staff levels below what would normally be considered functional and safe, given the types of work performed. In addition, there are not enough field supervisors to fill all
Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • B10INVITATION for BIDS (Includes Return Label) SP11
    BID ADDENDUM BID NO.: SP-18 Rev. 05/07 STATE OF CONNECTICUT Prev. Rev. NEW. 11/97 07PSX0349 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Rob Zalucki PROCUREMENT DIVISION Bid Due Date: Contract Specialist 165 Capitol Avenue, 5th Floor South 28 January 2008 (860)713-5139 HARTFORD, CT 06106-1659 Telephone Number BID ADDENDUM #1 DESCRIPTION: Rubbish Removal and Recycling Services for DEP State Parks BIDDERS NOTE: Please provide vendor authorization as required on the SP-28 form. This Addendum must be Signed & Returned with your Bid. Authorized Signature of Bidder Company Name APPROVED_________________________________ ROB ZALUCKI Contract Specialist (Original Signature on Document in Procurement Files) Date Issued: 22 January 2008 VENDOR AUTHORIZATION BID NO.: GUIDELINES STATE OF CONNECTICUT SP-28 Rev. 05/07 07PSX0349 Prev Rev. NEW 3/06 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROCUREMENT DIVISION Rob Zalucki 165 Capitol Avenue, 5th Floor South Contract Specialist (860)713-5139 HARTFORD, CT 06106-1659 Telephone Number Vendor Authorization Guidelines- Page 1 of 2 All contracts must include appropriate vendor documentation that does the following three things: A. Authorizes the vendor to enter into contracts, B. Authorizes a particular officer to execute contracts on behalf of the vendor and C. Evidences that the officer signing in fact holds his/her office. CORPORATIONS - Appropriate vendor documentation usually involves a certificate from the Secretary or other appropriate officer setting forth a copy of a board resolution. Sometimes this is not possible, in which case the vendor should observe the following: 1) In lieu of the secretary’s certificate, the vendors must submit: a) a current certified copy of the applicable section of the corporation’s bylaws which authorizes the execution of contracts by the signing person and b) a current certification that the officer signing the assignment agreement in fact holds that office.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement
    Testimony of Eric Hammerling, Executive Director, Connecticut Forest & Park Association Public Hearing Subject Matter Position Raised Bill 5477 : AN ACT ESTABLISHING A TAX ABATEMENT FOR Support CERTAIN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS . Raised Bill 5476: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A STATE -WIDE GEOGRAPHIC Support INFORMATION SYSTEM TASK FORCE . The Connecticut Forest & Park Association (CFPA) is the first conservation organization estab lished in Connecticut in 1895. For 12 5 years, CFPA has offered testimony before the General Assembly on various State Park and Forest, trail recreation, forestry, and land conservation iss ues. I am pleased to testify today to express CFPA’s support of Raised Bill 5477 , “An Act Establishing a Tax Abatement for Certain Conservation Easements .” What would this bill do (in plain language)? This bill would enable, but not require, muni cipalitie s to pass a local ordinance to waive property taxes for landowners who place a conservation easement on a portion of their property to protect the trail corridor of a State - designated Greenway . This would be a n outstanding way to support municipalities in encourag ing landowners to protect these speci al ly designated corridors in perpetuity fo r public use and enjoyment . Why is a tax abatement for Greenways both critical and urgent ? Greenw ays are designated by the state (C.G.S. Section 23 -10 2(b) ) as noteworthy recreational resources, and an incentive is needed to keep these trails intact for future generations. State -designa ted Greenways typic ally stretch across multiple properties owned by a patchwork of private, municipal, and state landowners. The loss of just one section of trail on one property can sever corridor conti nuity along a Greenway, and trails on private lands are the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Bicycle and Pedestrian
    CHAPTER 6 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES This chapter is a compilation of all bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Connecticut. The maps shown in this chapter will give the reader a perspective of where Connecticut's program is today and a view of where it may go with respect to a comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian system. Trails in Connecticut are designed with connectivity in mind, and are proposed with an interconnected system as the ultimate goal. These maps are to be used, by ConnDOT, to evaluate the suitability of accommodating walkers and bicyclists and to integrate the consideration of sidewalks and multi - use paths into all planning, design, construction and maintenance activities. This chapter is divided into four parts; existing and program facilities, proposed long range plans, greenways and the existing Bike Routes on the Connecticut Bicycle Map. 107 108 EXISTING AND PROGRAMED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The general location of the 74 major existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities and enhancement projects described in this section are shown in Figure 49. These facilities were developed by ConnDOT, ConnDEP and local communities. While the majority of these facilities are separate multi-use paths, several are signed bike lane routes that were developed along existing roads in the 1970's. Various funding sources were used in their construction including the use of Interstate funds in conjunction with major projects, local funds, National Recreational Trails funds, enhancement funds and state bond money. The following is a description of these facilities. A series of route maps showing several of these facilities is shown in Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Candlewood Lake Authority to Order at 7:34 P.M
    CANDLEWOOD LAKE AUT HORITY P.O. IMX 37 • 1FIFRNIA1. CONNECTI(I T 06784 0037- • R60) 354 6928 • F1\ 8601( 350 5611 WARNINGWARNING MinutesMinutes ofof RegularRegular MeetingMeeting CannotCannot IssueIssue CertifiedCertified CopiesCopies ReceivedReceived WithoutWithout originaloriginal signature.signature. FebruaryFebruary 8,8, 20122012 AttendingAttending Absent:Absent: H.H. BergerBerger ShermanSherman M.M. CalandrinoCalandrino DanburyDanbury P.P. SchaerSchaer ShermanSherman R.R. GuendelsbergerGuendelsberger NewNew MilfordMilford MM ToussaintToussaint NewNew MilfordMilford E.E. HayesHayes Sherman H.H. MayerMayer NewNew MilfordMilford J. Hodge New Fairfield BrookfieldBrookfield F.F. CioffiCioffi Brookfield J.J. MurphyMurphy t W.W. LohanLohan BrookfieldBrookfield w " w r t. t-- E.E. SiergiejSiergiej DanburyDanbury c. 4 N.N. GyleGyle NewNew FairfieldFairfield B.B. KembleKemble NewNew FairfieldFairfield CL CD I 0 L. Marsicano, CLA Executive Director M. Howarth, CLA Public Education Director cam; M w u F. Frattini, CLA Administrative Coordinator ID a N D. Vane, Chief of Marine Enforcement, CLAMP C= N Recorder: E. Siergiej Guests: M. Propper, Danbury C. Robinson, Danbury Howie Berger, Chairman, called the regular meeting of the Candlewood Lake Authority to order at 7:34 P.M. at Brookfield Town Hall, Brookfield, CT. He welcomed the guests, noting that Chris Robinson will be the new Danbury Delegate once he is sworn in. Secretary's Report Ed Siergiej, Secretary, asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the October 12, 2011 Regular meeting and the December 14, 2011 Special meeting, with none, Mark Toussaint moved to approve the minutes of October and December as written, seconded by Phyllis Schaer and voted with all in favor. Minutes have been accepted as written.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Collection Stock List
    THE CONNECTICUT COLLECTION BY JACK MCCONNELL McConnell & McNamara • 182 Broad Street • Wethersfield, CT 06109 • Voice 860.563.6154 • Fax 860.563.6159 • [email protected] mcconnellpix.com 200,000 stock photographs Photos available in color NORTHEAST: TRADITION First Company Governor’s Horse Guard Heritage Valley: SOUTHWEST: DISCOVERY Fisher Old Farms … with photos in the towns of Greater Hartford: Great River Park Bloomfield, East Windsor, Enfield, Greater New Haven: … with photos in the towns of Avon, Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Granby, Somers, Stafford, Suffield, … with photos in the towns of Ansonia, Burlington, Canton, East Hartford, Hartford Civic Center Windsor and Windsor Locks. Bethany, Derby, East Haven, Hamden, Ellington, Farmington, Glastonbury, Hartford Stage CT River in Enfield Milford, New Haven, North Branford, Hartford, Hebron, Manchester, Heublein Tower/Talcott Mountain CT Trolley Museum North Haven, Orange, Shelton, Marlborough, Newington, Rocky Hill, Hill-Stead Museum Imperial Nurseries Trumbull, West Haven and Simsbury, South Windsor, Vernon, Isham Terry House Martha A. Parson’s house Woodbridge. West Hartford and Wethersfield. Keeney Center New England Air Museum Aerials/skylines New Haven Aerials/skylines Keeney School House Luddy/Taylor Tobacco Valley Museum Bradley Point Park, kite flying Corporate buildings/Downtown scenes Lady Fenwick Cruise Old New-Gate Prison Center School Hospitals/Colleges/Libraries Legislative Office Building Oliver Ellsworth Homestead Chapel Street shops Museums/Attractions Maple Festival
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update
    SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN UPDATE Submitted for: FINAL South Central Region Council of Governments June 2017 Submitted by: South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update 1 4 9 This page has been intentionally left blank. 10 14 14 15 18 22 23 25 30 63 64 65 87 88 92 94 98 2 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 II. INTRODUCTION 9 A. The Value of Bicycling and Walking 10 B. Plan Purpose 14 C. Planning Process 14 D. Community Outreach 15 III. VISION, GOALS & ACTION STRATEGIES 18 IV. BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL 22 A. Statewide Overview 23 B. Regional Overview 25 C. Municipal Overview 30 V. SAFETY & CRASH ANALYSIS 63 A. Methodology 64 B. Findings 65 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS 87 A. On-Road Priority Areas 88 B. Off-Road Priority Areas 92 C. Design Recommendations 94 D. Policy Recommendations 98 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update 3 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update Chapter I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update Chapter II introduces the South Central The vision is stated as: Each goal includes a number of action Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update strategies that propose specific ways in which (Regional Plan Update). It describes SCRCOG and its member municipalities the goals could be implemented. the importance of bicycling and walking will encourage, promote; and continue as modes of active, or human-powered, to improve the conditions for bicycling, transportation. Some of the valuable benefits walking, and other forms of active of active transportation and its associated transportation, so that any person, infrastructure include: regardless of age, ability, or income will be able to walk, bicycle, or use other types • Healthy living – walking and bicycling of active transportation modes safely and promote good health conveniently throughout the Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Waramaug Watershed Agricultural Waste Management
    Lake Waramaug Watershed Agricultural Waste Management System Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Nonpoint Source Management Program Success Stories August 2000 Connecticut Department of Environmenatl Protection, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106-5127 - Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., Commissioner The Resource Lake Waramaug is located in the Housatonic River watershed in northwestern Connecticut in the towns of Washington, Warren, and Kent. This deep, 680-acre lake is the scenic center of the area’s tourism business, and is used for a variety of recreational activities, including boating, fishing, and swimming. Waramaug is the second largest natural lake in the state. The lake’s 14.3 square Photo by Stan Zaremba mile watershed is largely forested, with land use Lake Waramaug consisting of low-density residential development and several farms. Much of the lake’s shorefront Environmental Problems is developed with large-lot single family homes. Twenty-five years ago, thick mats of algae covered the sur- There are two state parks located on and near the face of Lake Waramaug, causing a panic among property lake, including the Lake Waramaug State Park and owners and local businesses. Dead fish washed ashore and Mount Bushnell State Park. became food for seagulls, raccoons, and other wildlife. The cause of the problem was over-enrichment caused by runoff of phosphorous and other nutrients from farms, lawns, roads, and septic systems. Warren These nutrients are considered a significant nonpoint source Sucker Brook (NPS) problem in the Housatonic River Watershed. (see Kent Lake Waramaug Nonpoint Source Pollution sidebar). The nutrients fed the growth of algae that turned the lake’s surface green every summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches
    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
    Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Basic Information Title: Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Project Number: 2010CT208B Start Date: 3/1/2010 End Date: 2/28/2011 Funding Source: 104B Congressional District: District 2 Research Category: Water Quality Focus Category: Water Quality, Surface Water, None Descriptors: None Principal Investigators: Daniel Civco, James D Hurd Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery1 Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Progress Report May 2011 Daniel Civco – Principal Investigator James Hurd – Co-Investigator Center for Landuse Education and Research (CLEAR) Department of Natural Resources and the Environment The University of Connecticut 1376 Storrs Road Storrs, CT 06269-4087 (p) 860-486-4610, (f) 860-486-5408 [email protected] [email protected] RESEARCH PROBLEM Connecticut has over 1,000 lakes and ponds larger than 5 acres in area. These water bodies provide important recreational opportunities, aesthetic values, and ecosystem services that contribute to the quality of life, environment, and economy of the state. Over the past 400 years, Connecticut has undergone significant alterations to its landscape. As a result of these mostly anthropogenic activities, including clearing of forests, agriculture, and urban and rural development, there have been significant impacts to the water quality of Connecticut’s lakes and ponds. While a natural process, the eutrophication of lakes caused by excess nutrient export in runoff has been, and continues to be, a pervasive problem (Siver et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • VHP Program Book
    The Connecticut Horse Council, Inc. The Connecticut Horse Council, Inc. P.O. Box 57 Durham, CT 06422 www.cthorsecouncil.org CONNECTICUT HORSE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE FOREST AND PARK SERVICE EQUESTRIAN & Land Management Administrations Revised 2009 The Connecticut Horse Council, Inc. VOLUNTEER HORSE PATROL The Connecticut Horse Council (CHC) partnered with Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) in 2003 to create the Volunteer Horse Patrol (VHP) to ride and serve in State Parks & Forests. This unique program benefits many aspects of the DEP, in helping to patrol and provide assistance to the DEP staff and public visitors to our state forests and parks. This also provides our membership the opportunity to volunteer their time to a community service, a cause that also benefits them and their equine companions. The establishment of this Patrol Unit comes at a critical time, when drastic cuts on our State Budget have caused layoffs, staff & supervisor reductions. This situation is forcing the closure of many state parks & forests and reduction of services due to lack of State Funding. The Volunteer Horse Patrol Program and Policies is based on the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Mounted Patrol Program and the National Park Service's Volunteers in Parks program (VIP). The Patrol operates under the auspices of the Connecticut Horse Council in cooperation with DEP and other land management administrations. The primary responsibility is to serve as auxiliary “eyes and ears” for the protection of the resource and its visitors -- on the lookout for what is going on out on the trails. Members assist with non-enforcement tasks such as promoting trail etiquette as well as provide hands on services maintaining and repairing trails and other facilities.
    [Show full text]