Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement Testimony of Eric Hammerling, Executive Director, Connecticut Forest & Park Association Public Hearing Subject Matter Position Raised Bill 5477 : AN ACT ESTABLISHING A TAX ABATEMENT FOR Support CERTAIN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS . Raised Bill 5476: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A STATE -WIDE GEOGRAPHIC Support INFORMATION SYSTEM TASK FORCE . The Connecticut Forest & Park Association (CFPA) is the first conservation organization estab lished in Connecticut in 1895. For 12 5 years, CFPA has offered testimony before the General Assembly on various State Park and Forest, trail recreation, forestry, and land conservation iss ues. I am pleased to testify today to express CFPA’s support of Raised Bill 5477 , “An Act Establishing a Tax Abatement for Certain Conservation Easements .” What would this bill do (in plain language)? This bill would enable, but not require, muni cipalitie s to pass a local ordinance to waive property taxes for landowners who place a conservation easement on a portion of their property to protect the trail corridor of a State - designated Greenway . This would be a n outstanding way to support municipalities in encourag ing landowners to protect these speci al ly designated corridors in perpetuity fo r public use and enjoyment . Why is a tax abatement for Greenways both critical and urgent ? Greenw ays are designated by the state (C.G.S. Section 23 -10 2(b) ) as noteworthy recreational resources, and an incentive is needed to keep these trails intact for future generations. State -designa ted Greenways typic ally stretch across multiple properties owned by a patchwork of private, municipal, and state landowners. The loss of just one section of trail on one property can sever corridor conti nuity along a Greenway, and trails on private lands are the most vulnerable. As private properties are developed an d/or subdivided over time, maintaining trail continuity becomes increasingly difficult and expensive. This would help keep these trail corridors connected. Recreational trails are at the heart of Connecticut’s outdoor recreation industry which overall generates $9 billion in revenues and supports 69 ,000 private sector jobs every year. How would this tax abatement impa ct local tax revenues? The impact on municipal property tax revenues should be relatively min or, and local revenues may increase if the municipality also promote s the Greenway to encourage visitors/contributors to the local economy. This tax abat ement would only happen under restrictive conditions: after passage of a local ordinance ; on a state -designated trail ; and after a willing la ndowner places a conservation easement on their trails corridor . A small revenue impact sh ould be offset by economic, public health, and many other local benefit s. What ’s a real -world example of how this would work? Example : Protecting 0.2 miles of trail on a mid -sized property (town removed to protect anonymity of landowner) A property owner owns 29.8 total acres assessed by a town at $192,820. Using the local mill rate of 29.32, this is equivalent to $189.71/acre in property taxes. This property hosts 0.2 miles of a State -designated Greenway which (with a maximum 100’ wi de corridor) is equivalent to 2.54 acres. The annual property tax that would be excluded on the 2.54 acres represents $481.86/year. If this landowner were willing to place a conservation easement on the ir trail corridor, and if the town passed a local ordinance allowing the tax abatemen t, the town could protect 2/10ths of a mile of trail forever for only $481.86/year . Which State -designated Greenways would benefit from this bill? A list of state -designated Greenways is maintained by the CT Department of Energy & Environmental Prote ction . CFPA has attached a list of Greenways (including towns) on the following pages for reference. ---------- CFPA also support s Raised Bill 5476 , “An Act Establishing a S tate -wide Geographic I nformation System Task Force. ” CFPA is a land and trail conservation organization, and in this capacity we depend upon Geographic Information System (GIS) data for making trail maps, identifying critical properties, for making online info rmation available to the public , and other purposes. Many other land conservation organizations, regional planning agencies, and others depend upon GIS data fo r many critical planning and visualization tasks. However, it is often difficult to pu ll together, assess, and/or present information that crosses town boundaries because of the varying availability of GIS data, data layers, parcel information, and standards across the state (such as a common definition for “protected open space ”). In a small state like Connectic ut, we should be able to access GIS data on a statewide basis, so we complement the Committee on encouraging this Task Force. ---------- I thank the Committee for raising th ese important bill s, and I am glad to respond to any questions you may have. State Designated Greenways (eligible under proposed bill) Town(s) Chaplin, Colchester, East Hampton, Hampton, Air Line State Park Trail Hebron, Lebanon, Pomfret, Portland, Thompson, Windham Bantam River Historical and Conservation Greenway Goshen Bigelow Brook Greenway Manchester Blackledge River Greenway Marlborough Blue-Blazed Hiking Trail System 96 towns statewide Captain John Bissell Trail South Windsor Charter Oak Greenway East Hartford, Manchester Colchester Greenway System Colchester Chester, Deep River, East Haddam, Essex, Haddam, Connecticut River Gateway Zone Lyme, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook Crosstown Trail South Windsor Eight Mile River Greenway East Haddam, Lyme, Salem Avon, Burlington, Canton, Cheshire, East Granby, Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Farmington, Granby, Hamden, New Haven, Plainville, Simsbury, Southington, Suffield Farmington River Trail Avon, Farmington, Simsbury Fenton River Ashford, Mansfield, Willington Five Mile River Corridor Thompson, Putnam, Killingly Great Oak Greenway Ledyard Hanover Pond Linear Trail Meriden Hockanum River Linear Park East Hartford, Ellington, Manchester, Vernon Andover, Bolton, Columbia, Coventry, Manchester, Hop River State Park Trail Vernon Housatonic Riverbelt Greenway New Milford to Stratford Ives Trail Danbury Larkin State Park Trail Middlebury, Naugatuck, Oxford, Southbury Litchfield Community Greenway Litchfield Little River Greenway Putnam, Woodstock Lower Farmington River Greenway Bloomfield, Windsor Mad River Greenway Wolcott Chester, Clinton, Deep River, Haddam, Killingworth, Menunketesuck - Cockaponset Regional (MCR) Greenway Westbrook Menunketesuck Greenway Clinton, Westbrook Avon, Berlin, Bloomfield, Branford, Durham, East Granby, East Haven, Farmington, Guilford, Metacomet Ridge System Meriden, Middlefield, Middletown, North Branford, Plainville, Southington, Suffield, Simsbury, Wallingford, West Hartford Mianus River Greenway Greenwich, Stamford Middlebury Greenway Middlebury Milford Greenway System Milford Mill Brook Greenway Windsor Mill River Greenway Stamford Moosup Valley State Park Trail Killingly, Plainfield Mount Hope River Ashford, Mansfield Ashford, Chaplin, Eastford, Mansfield, Union, Natchaug River Watershed Windham, Woodstock Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Derby, Harwinton, Litchfield, Naugatuck River Greenway Naugatuck, Seymour, Thomaston, Torrington, Waterbury, Watertown Neck River Corridor Protection Project Madison New London Waterfront Walkway/Bikeway New London New Milford River Trail Greenway New Milford Newington Greenway System Newington Newtown Greenway System Newtown North and South Branches of the Park River Bloomfield, Hartford, West Hartford Norwalk Heritage Greenway Norwalk Norwalk River Valley Linear Trail Danbury, Norwalk, Redding, Ridgefield, Wilton Old Lyme Greenway Old Lyme Pequonnock/Housatonic Railbed Greenway Bridgeport, Monroe, Trumbull Pomperaug River Greenway Southbury, Woodbury Pope Park Greenway Hartford Quinebaug River Corridor Canterbury Quinebaug River Greenway Extension Griswold Quinebaug River Multi-Purpose Trail Killingly, Plainfield Quinnipiac River Gorge Trail Meriden Cheshire, Hamden, Meriden, New Haven, North Quinnipiac River Greenway Haven, Plainville, Southington, Wallingford Riverfront Parks East Hartford, Hartford Salmon Brook Granby Scantic River Park and Greenway East Windsor, Enfield, Somers, South Windsor Shade Swamp Sanctuary Farmington Shelton Greenways System Shelton Bridgewater, Litchfield, New Milford, Roxbury, Shepaug Greenway Southbury, Warren, Washington Shetucket River Greenway Lisbon, Norwich, Preston, Scotland Branford, East Haven, Guilford, Madison, New Shoreline Greenway Trail Haven South Meadows Greenway at Goodwin College East Hartford, Glastonbury, Wethersfield Steele Brook Greenway Waterbury, Watertown Still River Greenway Brookfield, Danbury Tankerhoosen Greenway Vernon Trolley Trail Plainfield Upper Connecticut River Windsor Upper Farmington River Canton West Mountain Trails Simsbury Bethany, Hamden, New Haven, West Haven, West River Watershed Woodbridge Columbia, Coventry, Ellington, Lebanon, Mansfield, Willimantic River Greenway Stafford, Tolland, Willington, Windham Ansonia, Bethany, Derby, Hamden, New Haven, Woodbridge Greenway Trails Seymour, Woodbridge Yantic River Greenway Norwich.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6 Bicycle and Pedestrian
    CHAPTER 6 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES This chapter is a compilation of all bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Connecticut. The maps shown in this chapter will give the reader a perspective of where Connecticut's program is today and a view of where it may go with respect to a comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian system. Trails in Connecticut are designed with connectivity in mind, and are proposed with an interconnected system as the ultimate goal. These maps are to be used, by ConnDOT, to evaluate the suitability of accommodating walkers and bicyclists and to integrate the consideration of sidewalks and multi - use paths into all planning, design, construction and maintenance activities. This chapter is divided into four parts; existing and program facilities, proposed long range plans, greenways and the existing Bike Routes on the Connecticut Bicycle Map. 107 108 EXISTING AND PROGRAMED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The general location of the 74 major existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities and enhancement projects described in this section are shown in Figure 49. These facilities were developed by ConnDOT, ConnDEP and local communities. While the majority of these facilities are separate multi-use paths, several are signed bike lane routes that were developed along existing roads in the 1970's. Various funding sources were used in their construction including the use of Interstate funds in conjunction with major projects, local funds, National Recreational Trails funds, enhancement funds and state bond money. The following is a description of these facilities. A series of route maps showing several of these facilities is shown in Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Open Space Plan: Part One
    REDDING, CONNECTICUT OPEN SPACE PLAN 2018 SUPPLEMENT TO THE REDDING TOWN PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2018 Prepared by the Redding Conservation Commission Redding Open Space Plan 2018 A report on the protection of natural systems in Redding, Connecticut. Prepared by the Redding Conservation Commission as a supplement to the 2018 Town Plan of Conservation and Development. The Conservation Commission David Pattee, Chairman Stuart Green William Hill Tina Miller Wallace Perlman Susan Robinson Redding, Connecticut Town of Redding Page 1 Open Space Plan – 2018 Table of Contents OPEN SPACE PLAN............................................................................................................... 1 2018 OPEN SPACE PLAN: PART ONE ................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 Section 1-1: Goals of the Open Space Plan .................................................................................. 3 Section 1-2: Existing Open Space ................................................................................................. 4 GREENBELTS ............................................................................................................................. 5 Section 1-3: Lands for Protection ................................................................................................ 6 Section 1-4: Additional Open Space Concerns ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION THEMES H E L
    B e t CONSERVATION THEMES h e l Overview of Conservation Themes Bethel’s character is largely the result of its unique combination of land and Protecting important water, as well as historic and scenic resources. As these resources are mutually resources is a critical element in maintaining dependent upon one another, negative impacts to one can negatively impact community character and others. Properly protected, these important resources will continue to have ensures quality of life for positive impacts upon the Town’s quality of life, for generations to come. current and future These issues are addressed early in the planning process since it is necessary to generations. identify those resources that the community wishes to preserve and protect before making decisions about where to locate development and what types of development to encourage. Although Open Space preservation was identified as the most important issue in community workshops, this section leads with a discussion of natural resources, which are also a very important consideration and can have a tremendous impact on the qualities of individual pieces of open space. Open Space Land Resources Historic Resources Water Resources o rces 19 NATURAL RESOURCES Overview “The nation behaves well if Preserving and conserving natural resources protects environmental functions, it treats natural resources maintains biodiversity, and prevents environmental damage. as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value.” Theodore Roosevelt Tree Canopy Water Resource 20 Protect Land Based Natural Resources Bethel is fortunate to have so many acres of forest land, meadowlands, and other undeveloped natural lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Recreational Trails Plan Outline
    Connecticut National Recreational Trails Program Recreational Trails Plan Last Updated September 2011 Connecticut Recreational Trails Plan Introduction Connecticut, though small in land area, is rich in natural, historical, and recreational resources. Weaving through and connecting the varied landscapes are trails of all descriptions, from the narrowest of hiking paths to multi-use corridors running through many cities and towns. Thousands of walkers, cyclists, equestrians, skaters, and others take advantage of these pathways each day. While always recognized for their recreational value, trails today are also seen as a means to improve the health and economic vitality of the areas through which they pass. This plan is intended to ensure that Connecticut’s trail system is sustained and expanded in a way that supports these functions and meets the needs of trail users without compromising the Department of Energy & Environmental Protection’s (DEEP) basic mission. An examination of the existing trail network and potential connections is needed, as is a look at how the system may be best improved in the future. This includes forging new partnerships beyond the traditional trail constituencies. Trails and greenways have a positive impact on individuals and improve communities by providing not only recreation and transportation opportunities, but also by influencing economic and community development. Some of the many trails and greenways benefits include: * making communities better places to live by preserving and creating open spaces; * encouraging physical fitness and healthy lifestyles; * creating new opportunities for outdoor recreation and non-motorized transportation; * strengthening local economies; * protecting the environment; and * preserving culturally and historically valuable areas. "To make a greenway is to make a community." - Charles E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ives Trail Greenway
    IVES TRAIL GREENWAY CONNECTING DANBURY BETHEL AND RIDGEFIELD, CT Hiking the Ives Trail June 5, 2010 by Mike Cunningham The Ives Trail is a multi-town trail in western Connecticut. The length is approximately 15 miles. Back in February when I put this hike in for National Trails Day, it seemed likely that the Ives Trail would be finished by then. We had relocated the trail from its original path and there were several easements needed. The new trail sections had not been blazed and were definitely not finished although I know where they go. Much of it, but not all, had ribbon flags to indicate the way. I had GPS waypoints for various critical places. The trail includes a stream crossing which will eventually have a bridge on it. It did not. It can be crossed on rocks and there is a ladder there, but it is swampy on both sides. We got wet feet. The trail is nominally 15 miles and is a real bushwhack. I put the hike in to the AMC, the GMC, the ADK and the CFPA. Somehow it did not get into the CFPA book. No one from the GMC or ADK signed up for the hike although there was one inquiry through the GMC. Ten people signed up for the hike. The forecast was for showers sometime late in the day. As the hike was likely to take about 8 hours running into the showers four people did not come. We met at the appointed time and drove to the start of the hike.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Plan of Conservation and Development
    Eversource Energy Southwest Connecticut Reliability Project Bulk Filing #1 of Municipal Documents Regional Plans of Conservation and Development SWCT Reliability Project June 2016 Eversource Energy Note: This page is intentionally left blank SWCT Reliability Project June 2016 ADOPTED EFFECTIVE 7/1/2009 The regional plan shall be designed to promote with the greatest efficiency and economy the coordinated development of its area of operation and the general welfare and prosperity of its people - CT General Statutes 8-35a This Document has been extracted from HVCEO’s historic website. The website is archived here for reference There are formatting changes from the original to provide improve navigation throughout the document. This original document was created by HVCEO, and has been extracted by Mike Towle, Associate Planner, WestCOG, on 5/24/2016 In 1947 Connecticut first authorized regional planning. The goals were to provide a larger context for land use decisions made by individual towns, and to have a governmental entity available to address issues that extended beyond the boundaries of any single community. These goals remain today. How HVCEO has managed this responsibility for Greater Danbury since its formation in 1968, and the challenges encountered, is recorded in the History of HVCEO. State statutes require that the physical elements of regional planning be codified in an advisory regional plan by each regional planning organization in Connecticut. The Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Official (HVCEO) is one of fifteen suchregional planning organizations. This document is HVCEO's physically oriented Regional Plan of Conservation and Development. This Plan updates earlier regional plans of 1971, 1981 and 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Danielson Airport (LZD)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Danielson Airport (LZD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 May 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Danielson Airport (LZD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 5/17/2017 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL DANIELSON AIRPORT (LZD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Oxford Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, 2014
    TOWN OF OXFORD NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE, 2014 Original Plan Adopted October 30, 2006 Plan Update Prepared February 24, 2014 Plan Update Adopted July 2, 2014 MMI #1452-11 Prepared for the: TOWN OF OXFORD, CONNECTICUT Emergency Services Department Oxford Town Hall 486 Oxford Road Oxford, CT 06478-1298 (203) 888-9090 www.oxford-ct.gov The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds provided by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection under a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Town of Oxford and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. The report does not constitute a specification or regulation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 99 Realty Drive Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 (203) 271-1773 www.miloneandmacbroom.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CONTACT INFORMATION This plan update was prepared under the direction of the Town of Oxford. The following individual should be contacted with questions or comments regarding the plan: Chief Scott Pelletier Emergency Management Director, Local Coordinator Emergency Services Department Town of Oxford 486 Oxford Road Oxford, CT 06478-1298 (203) 888-9090 Phone (203) 888-2136 Fax [email protected] This Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update could not have been completed without the time and dedication of the additional following individuals at the local level: Mr. George Temple, First Selectman Ms. Anna Rycenga, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. Wayne Watt, Director of Public Works Ms. Kathleen O’Neill, Grant Administrator Mr. Andrew Ferrillo, Inland Wetlands Officer Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ridgefield Encyclopedia ===
    === THE RIDGEFIELD ENCYCLOPEDIA === A compendium of nearly 4,500 people, places and things relating to Ridgefield, Connecticut. by Jack Sanders [Note: Abbreviations and sources are explained at the end of the document. This work is being constantly expanded and revised; this version was updated on 4-27-2021.] A A&P: The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company opened a small grocery store at 378 Main Street in 1948 (long after liquor store — q.v.); moved to 378 Main Street in the Bissell Building in the early 1940s. It became a supermarket at 46 Danbury Road in 1962 (now Walgreens site); closed November 1981. [JFS] [DD100] A&P Liquor Store: Opened at ONS133½ Main Street Sept. 12, 1935; [P9/12/1935] later was located at ONS86 Main Street. [1940 telephone directory] Aaron’s Court: A short, dead-end road serving 9 of 10 lots at 45 acre subdivision on the east side of Ridgebury Road by Lewis and Barry Finch, father-son, who had in 1980 proposed a corporate park here; named for Aaron Turner (q.v.), circus owner, who was born nearby. [RN] A Better Chance (ABC) is Ridgefield chapter of a national organization that sponsors talented, motivated children from inner-cities to attend RHS; students live at 32 Fairview Avenue; program began 1987 with six students. A Birdseye View: Column in Ridgefield Press for many years, written by Duncan Smith (q.v.) Abbe family: Lived on West Lane and West Mountain, 1935-36: James E. Abbe, noted photographer of celebrities, his wife, Polly Shorrock Abbe, and their three children Patience, Richard and John; the children became national celebrities when their 1936 book, Around the World in Eleven Years.
    [Show full text]
  • HVCEO Regional Bike Plan
    January 2015 PREPARED FOR: HVCEO Housatonic Valley Council of Elected O f f i c i a l s BY: HARTransit GREATER DANBURY REGIONAL BIKE PLAN FINAL REPORT January 2015 This document was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation or the Federal Transit Administration. Prepared for HVCEO by Eric C. Bergstraesser, Chief Executive Officer Report Staff Richard A. Schreiner, Director of Service Development Stephanie A. Scavelli, Transportation Planner Andrew C. O’Connell, Marketing and Public Relations Coordinator George Blake, HVCEO Geographic Information Systems Manager ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the following people for their expertise, invaluable support, and generous assistance on the development of this project. Apologies extended for any omissions: Betty Brosius Jonathan Chew Jacqui Dowd Dave and Marti Fine Sandy Fry Francisco Gomes (Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc.) Stuart Green Lukas Herbert Alex Karman Amy Mangold Tom O’Brien Sharon Okoye David Pattee John Pilner Katherine Rattan Paul Roche Cover Photo: A sharrow marking on the pavement alerts drivers to a designated shared roadway along Housatonic Avenue in New Milford, CT. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 OVERVIEW AND POLICY OBJECTIVES …………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction ……...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Relevant Federal and State of Connecticut Programs and Policies …….. 4 1.3 Demographics …………………………………………………………... 8 1.4 Bicycle Crash Data ……………………………………………………... 10 1.5 Special Concerns in Bicycle Planning …….............................................. 15 2 INVENTORY OF ROUTES AND PLANS ……………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Waterbury-Oxford Airport
    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Waterbury-Oxford Airport Prepared for: Business Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Master Report
    Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION PROJECT SCOPE 5 BACKGROUND 6 CONTEXT AND SITE DESCRIPTION 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS 15 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 16 SLOPES 19 WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS 25 VEGETATION 33 WILDLIFE AND HABITAT 35 VIEWS 39 ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 40 ANALYSIS SUMMARY (ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVTY INDEX) 43 SOCIAL ANALYSIS HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 49 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 51 FRANCIS J. CLARKE INDUSTRIAL PARK 53 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 54 ZONING 59 LIABILITY ON PUBLIC RECREATION LANDS 61 CONCEPTS CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT 65 CONCEPT #1: GATEWAY TO RECREATION 67 CONCEPT #2: CLARKE PARK CONNECTIONS 71 INDUSTRIAL PARK RECOMMENDATIONS 75 CONSERVATION PLANNING 77 CONCLUSION 81 REFERENCES 83 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: GREENWAY ECONOMICS APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY NEWS APPENDIX C: COMMERCIAL LAND USE INFORMATION APPENDIX D: STATE POLICY APPENDIX E: CONSERVATION INFORMATION Tables and Figures Figure 1 CONTEXT 9 Figure 2 AERIAL PHOTO 11 Figure 3 SOILS 17 Table 1 COMPARISON OF SLOPE PERCENTAGES 19 Figure 4 SLOPES 21 Figure 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 23 Figure 6 WATERWAYS INVENTORY 29 Figure 7 WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS SENSITIVITY 31 Figure 8 RARE SPECIES & UNIQUE HABITATS 37 Figure 9 ACCESS 41 Figure 10 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX 45 Table 2 COMPARISON OF PLAYING FIELDS, COURTS, AND TRACKS 51 Table 3 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED PARKS AND NON-INTENSIVE ACRES 52 Table 4 TRAIL SYSTEM REVENUES 55 Figure 11 TRAIL CORRIDOR 57 Figure 12 CONCEPT 1 ”GATEWAY TO RECREATION” 69 Figure 13 CONCEPT 2 “CLARKE PARK CONNECTIONS”73 INTRODUCTION Terre Haute Land-Use Study PROJECT SCOPE In January 2003, a student design team from the Conway School of Landscape Design was contracted by the Town of Bethel to do a land-use feasibility study for the Terre Haute property and the contiguous watershed lands.
    [Show full text]