DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Plan of Conservation and Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Plan of Conservation and Development Eversource Energy Southwest Connecticut Reliability Project Bulk Filing #1 of Municipal Documents Regional Plans of Conservation and Development SWCT Reliability Project June 2016 Eversource Energy Note: This page is intentionally left blank SWCT Reliability Project June 2016 ADOPTED EFFECTIVE 7/1/2009 The regional plan shall be designed to promote with the greatest efficiency and economy the coordinated development of its area of operation and the general welfare and prosperity of its people - CT General Statutes 8-35a This Document has been extracted from HVCEO’s historic website. The website is archived here for reference There are formatting changes from the original to provide improve navigation throughout the document. This original document was created by HVCEO, and has been extracted by Mike Towle, Associate Planner, WestCOG, on 5/24/2016 In 1947 Connecticut first authorized regional planning. The goals were to provide a larger context for land use decisions made by individual towns, and to have a governmental entity available to address issues that extended beyond the boundaries of any single community. These goals remain today. How HVCEO has managed this responsibility for Greater Danbury since its formation in 1968, and the challenges encountered, is recorded in the History of HVCEO. State statutes require that the physical elements of regional planning be codified in an advisory regional plan by each regional planning organization in Connecticut. The Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Official (HVCEO) is one of fifteen suchregional planning organizations. This document is HVCEO's physically oriented Regional Plan of Conservation and Development. This Plan updates earlier regional plans of 1971, 1981 and 1997. It is designed to meet the requirements of State Statute Chapter 127, Section 8-35a, that a regional plan "shall be designed to promote with the greatest efficiency and economy the coordinated development of its area of operation and the general welfare and prosperity of its people." The HVCEO Regional Plan has the following uses: --- 1. Provides leading advice on Responsible Growth strategies --- 2. Sets development priorities as required by CGS 8-35a --- 3. Coordinates water and sewer utilities between towns --- 4. Promotes preservation of intertown water supplies and is supply assessment required under CGS 25-33g --- 5. Markets the region as a coordinated metropolitan area --- 6. Assists private investment studies and municipal bond sales --- 7. Meets 23 USC 134(h)(1) mandate for land use/transportation coordination --- 8. Works against mandatory consistency of local, regional and state plans --- 9. Addresses CGS 22a 102d regional input to municipal plans --- 10. Addresses CGS 16a-28 regional input to state plan --- 11. Addresses CGS 8-3b on coordination along boundaries --- 12. Coordinates aspects of municipal land use regulation The Greater Danbury - New Milford Area is one of fifteen state defined planning regions in Connecticut. Connecticut's original 1947 regional planning statute recognized that the growth of a municipality influences, and is influenced by, the surrounding region, that no town is an isolated entity. Since then it has become increasing clear that critically important service delivery, environmental, economic, utility and transportation systems are regional by nature and their proper development and management improves with a regional perspective. The authority of this policy document upon the ten municipal plans is advisory. The reasoning is quite logical; the choice as to who makes land use decisions should be those who live closest to the results. This is opposed to non-local persons who are insulated from experiencing the consequences of their decisions and the raised eyebrows of their neighbors. The Greater Danbury Region's ten municipal plans are required by statute to consider the regional plan in their ten year updates. Similarly, the local plans contain important considerations in the creation of this Regional Plan. This Regional Plan is part of a geographically interrelated planning process in Connecticut, taking its place between the Connecticut Conservation and Development Policies Plan for 2005-2010 and the Housatonic Region’s ten municipal plans of conservation and development: 2010 Ridgefield Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2010 New Milford Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2008 Redding Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2007 Bethel Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2004 Newtown Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2003 New Fairfield Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2002 Danbury Plan of Conservation and Development web link 2001 Bridgewater Plan of Conservation and Development 2001 Brookfield Plan of Conservation and Development 2001 Sherman Plan of Conservation and Development web link Fundamental to the preparation of any physical plan are the primary site factors of soil, slope and wetness. These factors interact with the Region's pattern of hills and valleys, as shown on the map below: Pattern of hills and valleys in the Housatonic Region. Browns are highest elevations, descending thru yellows and greens to lowlands. Proceed to the full size Topographic Overview Map. While the provision of water and sewer utilities may mitigate some site constraints, in this hilly Region the geographic extent of such utilities will always be limited. Successful planning, then, will require municipal regulations to take into account both the presence of development inducing utilities and the traditional natural site limitations of soil, slope and wetness. As for soils, unfortunately no soil category in our area is entirely problem free. Excessively drained soils may seem to solve hydraulic problems, but by the same token are at risk for groundwater contamination. And the area's many shallow and rocky soils can potentially impair septic system functioning, heightening regulatory review and the expense of design. Soil above increasingly stony subsurface layers Further, as the percentage of slope starts to rise, especially above 15%, there is increasing slope instability, greater potential for erosion and various structural concerns. And degree of wetness is a universal constraint at all locations. These core natural variables have long been recognized within the texts of local development regulations, with varying degrees of articulation and staff support for enforcement. As a planning aid for the regulatory process, defined below are four generalized and increasing degrees of constraint upon development, from 1) minimal to 2) moderate, 3) areas of more caution and finally 4) areas of most caution, as follows: MINIMAL: These most favorable areas have only a few or slight environmental constraints for development. This category includes excessively drained soils and also well drained soils with less than 15% slopes. Note that for mapping purposes, added in here are the soil categories of “urban” and “other” land, especially covering large portions of built up central Danbury and some town centers. MODERATE: Having moderate or localized areas requiring restrictions before approval of development. But problems may usually be overcome with careful environmental planning and mitigation. This category contains well drained soils with 15% to 25% slopes and/or well drained soils with high seasonal water table. Also included here are hardpan soils of less than 15% slope, and shallow or rocky soils of less than 15% slope. MORE CAUTION: Defined as having limitations that can take considerably more effort to overcome with environmental planning and mitigation. Included here are shallow or rocky soils with slopes 15% to 25%, hardpan soils of 15% to 25% slope and/or hardpan soils with high seasonal water table, and lastly the higher elevation 500 year frequency portion of the floodplain. Also included in these More Caution areas are soils with slopes in excess of a 25% slope (but unfortunately not included on the lavender areas on the maps below as it was digitally unavailable) On such steep slopes, limitations on development may be difficult to overcome even with the advanced environmental planning and mitigation. MOST CAUTION: Areas with obvious severe or very severe limitations on development. This strictest category includes the lower elevation 100 year frequency portion of the floodplain, peat, muck, and those soils in the CT Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act definition of wetland soils that are poorly drained, very poorly drained and alluvial. Sources: The Region's soil types have been combined into groups based on the landmark 1974 report entitled "Know Your Land" by the University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service. Also, the 2008 regional plan of the neighboring Central Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments (COGCNV), Fairfield County and Litchfield County Soil Surveys (on file at the HVCEO office), and HVCEO staff. Note: These maps are for generalized planning purposes only. Sample of soil, slope and floodplain constraint map for the Danbury - Bethel border area The maps below suggest how, from a generalized perspective, local regulations and review procedures should increase their level of concern and extent of permit conditioning: 1. LINK TO CONSTRAINTS ON DEVELOPMENT MAP FOR BETHEL 2. LINK TO CONSTRAINTS ON DEVELOPMENT MAP FOR BRIDGEWATER 3. LINK TO CONSTRAINTS ON DEVELOPMENT MAP FOR BROOKFIELD 4. LINK TO CONSTRAINTS ON DEVELOPMENT MAP FOR DANBURY 5. LINK TO CONSTRAINTS ON DEVELOPMENT MAP FOR NEW
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Park Association-Support Act Establishing a Tax Abatement
    Testimony of Eric Hammerling, Executive Director, Connecticut Forest & Park Association Public Hearing Subject Matter Position Raised Bill 5477 : AN ACT ESTABLISHING A TAX ABATEMENT FOR Support CERTAIN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS . Raised Bill 5476: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A STATE -WIDE GEOGRAPHIC Support INFORMATION SYSTEM TASK FORCE . The Connecticut Forest & Park Association (CFPA) is the first conservation organization estab lished in Connecticut in 1895. For 12 5 years, CFPA has offered testimony before the General Assembly on various State Park and Forest, trail recreation, forestry, and land conservation iss ues. I am pleased to testify today to express CFPA’s support of Raised Bill 5477 , “An Act Establishing a Tax Abatement for Certain Conservation Easements .” What would this bill do (in plain language)? This bill would enable, but not require, muni cipalitie s to pass a local ordinance to waive property taxes for landowners who place a conservation easement on a portion of their property to protect the trail corridor of a State - designated Greenway . This would be a n outstanding way to support municipalities in encourag ing landowners to protect these speci al ly designated corridors in perpetuity fo r public use and enjoyment . Why is a tax abatement for Greenways both critical and urgent ? Greenw ays are designated by the state (C.G.S. Section 23 -10 2(b) ) as noteworthy recreational resources, and an incentive is needed to keep these trails intact for future generations. State -designa ted Greenways typic ally stretch across multiple properties owned by a patchwork of private, municipal, and state landowners. The loss of just one section of trail on one property can sever corridor conti nuity along a Greenway, and trails on private lands are the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Open Space Plan: Part One
    REDDING, CONNECTICUT OPEN SPACE PLAN 2018 SUPPLEMENT TO THE REDDING TOWN PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2018 Prepared by the Redding Conservation Commission Redding Open Space Plan 2018 A report on the protection of natural systems in Redding, Connecticut. Prepared by the Redding Conservation Commission as a supplement to the 2018 Town Plan of Conservation and Development. The Conservation Commission David Pattee, Chairman Stuart Green William Hill Tina Miller Wallace Perlman Susan Robinson Redding, Connecticut Town of Redding Page 1 Open Space Plan – 2018 Table of Contents OPEN SPACE PLAN............................................................................................................... 1 2018 OPEN SPACE PLAN: PART ONE ................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 Section 1-1: Goals of the Open Space Plan .................................................................................. 3 Section 1-2: Existing Open Space ................................................................................................. 4 GREENBELTS ............................................................................................................................. 5 Section 1-3: Lands for Protection ................................................................................................ 6 Section 1-4: Additional Open Space Concerns ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION THEMES H E L
    B e t CONSERVATION THEMES h e l Overview of Conservation Themes Bethel’s character is largely the result of its unique combination of land and Protecting important water, as well as historic and scenic resources. As these resources are mutually resources is a critical element in maintaining dependent upon one another, negative impacts to one can negatively impact community character and others. Properly protected, these important resources will continue to have ensures quality of life for positive impacts upon the Town’s quality of life, for generations to come. current and future These issues are addressed early in the planning process since it is necessary to generations. identify those resources that the community wishes to preserve and protect before making decisions about where to locate development and what types of development to encourage. Although Open Space preservation was identified as the most important issue in community workshops, this section leads with a discussion of natural resources, which are also a very important consideration and can have a tremendous impact on the qualities of individual pieces of open space. Open Space Land Resources Historic Resources Water Resources o rces 19 NATURAL RESOURCES Overview “The nation behaves well if Preserving and conserving natural resources protects environmental functions, it treats natural resources maintains biodiversity, and prevents environmental damage. as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value.” Theodore Roosevelt Tree Canopy Water Resource 20 Protect Land Based Natural Resources Bethel is fortunate to have so many acres of forest land, meadowlands, and other undeveloped natural lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Recreational Trails Plan Outline
    Connecticut National Recreational Trails Program Recreational Trails Plan Last Updated September 2011 Connecticut Recreational Trails Plan Introduction Connecticut, though small in land area, is rich in natural, historical, and recreational resources. Weaving through and connecting the varied landscapes are trails of all descriptions, from the narrowest of hiking paths to multi-use corridors running through many cities and towns. Thousands of walkers, cyclists, equestrians, skaters, and others take advantage of these pathways each day. While always recognized for their recreational value, trails today are also seen as a means to improve the health and economic vitality of the areas through which they pass. This plan is intended to ensure that Connecticut’s trail system is sustained and expanded in a way that supports these functions and meets the needs of trail users without compromising the Department of Energy & Environmental Protection’s (DEEP) basic mission. An examination of the existing trail network and potential connections is needed, as is a look at how the system may be best improved in the future. This includes forging new partnerships beyond the traditional trail constituencies. Trails and greenways have a positive impact on individuals and improve communities by providing not only recreation and transportation opportunities, but also by influencing economic and community development. Some of the many trails and greenways benefits include: * making communities better places to live by preserving and creating open spaces; * encouraging physical fitness and healthy lifestyles; * creating new opportunities for outdoor recreation and non-motorized transportation; * strengthening local economies; * protecting the environment; and * preserving culturally and historically valuable areas. "To make a greenway is to make a community." - Charles E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ives Trail Greenway
    IVES TRAIL GREENWAY CONNECTING DANBURY BETHEL AND RIDGEFIELD, CT Hiking the Ives Trail June 5, 2010 by Mike Cunningham The Ives Trail is a multi-town trail in western Connecticut. The length is approximately 15 miles. Back in February when I put this hike in for National Trails Day, it seemed likely that the Ives Trail would be finished by then. We had relocated the trail from its original path and there were several easements needed. The new trail sections had not been blazed and were definitely not finished although I know where they go. Much of it, but not all, had ribbon flags to indicate the way. I had GPS waypoints for various critical places. The trail includes a stream crossing which will eventually have a bridge on it. It did not. It can be crossed on rocks and there is a ladder there, but it is swampy on both sides. We got wet feet. The trail is nominally 15 miles and is a real bushwhack. I put the hike in to the AMC, the GMC, the ADK and the CFPA. Somehow it did not get into the CFPA book. No one from the GMC or ADK signed up for the hike although there was one inquiry through the GMC. Ten people signed up for the hike. The forecast was for showers sometime late in the day. As the hike was likely to take about 8 hours running into the showers four people did not come. We met at the appointed time and drove to the start of the hike.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ridgefield Encyclopedia ===
    === THE RIDGEFIELD ENCYCLOPEDIA === A compendium of nearly 4,500 people, places and things relating to Ridgefield, Connecticut. by Jack Sanders [Note: Abbreviations and sources are explained at the end of the document. This work is being constantly expanded and revised; this version was updated on 4-27-2021.] A A&P: The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company opened a small grocery store at 378 Main Street in 1948 (long after liquor store — q.v.); moved to 378 Main Street in the Bissell Building in the early 1940s. It became a supermarket at 46 Danbury Road in 1962 (now Walgreens site); closed November 1981. [JFS] [DD100] A&P Liquor Store: Opened at ONS133½ Main Street Sept. 12, 1935; [P9/12/1935] later was located at ONS86 Main Street. [1940 telephone directory] Aaron’s Court: A short, dead-end road serving 9 of 10 lots at 45 acre subdivision on the east side of Ridgebury Road by Lewis and Barry Finch, father-son, who had in 1980 proposed a corporate park here; named for Aaron Turner (q.v.), circus owner, who was born nearby. [RN] A Better Chance (ABC) is Ridgefield chapter of a national organization that sponsors talented, motivated children from inner-cities to attend RHS; students live at 32 Fairview Avenue; program began 1987 with six students. A Birdseye View: Column in Ridgefield Press for many years, written by Duncan Smith (q.v.) Abbe family: Lived on West Lane and West Mountain, 1935-36: James E. Abbe, noted photographer of celebrities, his wife, Polly Shorrock Abbe, and their three children Patience, Richard and John; the children became national celebrities when their 1936 book, Around the World in Eleven Years.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Report
    Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION PROJECT SCOPE 5 BACKGROUND 6 CONTEXT AND SITE DESCRIPTION 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS 15 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 16 SLOPES 19 WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS 25 VEGETATION 33 WILDLIFE AND HABITAT 35 VIEWS 39 ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 40 ANALYSIS SUMMARY (ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVTY INDEX) 43 SOCIAL ANALYSIS HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 49 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 51 FRANCIS J. CLARKE INDUSTRIAL PARK 53 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 54 ZONING 59 LIABILITY ON PUBLIC RECREATION LANDS 61 CONCEPTS CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT 65 CONCEPT #1: GATEWAY TO RECREATION 67 CONCEPT #2: CLARKE PARK CONNECTIONS 71 INDUSTRIAL PARK RECOMMENDATIONS 75 CONSERVATION PLANNING 77 CONCLUSION 81 REFERENCES 83 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: GREENWAY ECONOMICS APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY NEWS APPENDIX C: COMMERCIAL LAND USE INFORMATION APPENDIX D: STATE POLICY APPENDIX E: CONSERVATION INFORMATION Tables and Figures Figure 1 CONTEXT 9 Figure 2 AERIAL PHOTO 11 Figure 3 SOILS 17 Table 1 COMPARISON OF SLOPE PERCENTAGES 19 Figure 4 SLOPES 21 Figure 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 23 Figure 6 WATERWAYS INVENTORY 29 Figure 7 WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS SENSITIVITY 31 Figure 8 RARE SPECIES & UNIQUE HABITATS 37 Figure 9 ACCESS 41 Figure 10 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX 45 Table 2 COMPARISON OF PLAYING FIELDS, COURTS, AND TRACKS 51 Table 3 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED PARKS AND NON-INTENSIVE ACRES 52 Table 4 TRAIL SYSTEM REVENUES 55 Figure 11 TRAIL CORRIDOR 57 Figure 12 CONCEPT 1 ”GATEWAY TO RECREATION” 69 Figure 13 CONCEPT 2 “CLARKE PARK CONNECTIONS”73 INTRODUCTION Terre Haute Land-Use Study PROJECT SCOPE In January 2003, a student design team from the Conway School of Landscape Design was contracted by the Town of Bethel to do a land-use feasibility study for the Terre Haute property and the contiguous watershed lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwaysmap2019pdf.Pdf
    North Canaan 9 5 Colebrook Hartland 5 8 Suffield Somers Union Salisbury Stafford Norfolk Enfield Thompson µ y Woodstock Granby b 59 Canaan n a r 1 G 8 t 7 1 Barkhamsted s a Windsor Locks Ellington 2 Winchester E 8 or s n Putnam ind 4 Explanation o t W t 3 s 0 E Ea g a 7 n Ashford i s l l t 9 i Major Highways Tolland f Windsor 2 o n 5 Simsbury W r B 1 2 Pomfret o d t l o 3 7 Sharon n 3 Greenways o 6 0 9 a 6 1 Cornwall Goshen 1 m 2 C r 3 o 2 f ds 7 i in Existing Torrington New Hartford 2 e W Killingly l th d Sou Vernon 6 9 4 6 C 2 6 2019 Designated 1 h n a E W 4 o 5 p t a l e 6 p Avon Mansfield i Brooklyn s B n Clinton Blueway s d t Coventry m r o t r ste H e h a c l H o n 6 a t f M o a H a t 5 r r n Clinton Greenway r 5 Burlington t t a f 2 Harwinton f 7 o r o H 1 3 r e r Warren Litchfield d d v 0 Blue Blazed Hiking Trails o 7 Kent d g Farmington n S n 7 i N A c 5 3 l r Metacomet Ridge System o 2 e 8 a 4 i Windham e t n t w i b l 75 a Plainfield 0 Wethersfield S a i m n t n 6 i Glastonbury u Morris d r g l h o t Bristol B t 4 Pla o C u in v n ill w Thomaston o e e ll Canterbury 4 i M m 6 Washington N H Hebron 3 1 4 Notes: y y 4 a l ck W 5 r 4 o 5 P l R b S n p 1 Bethle a i The Blue Blazed Hiking Trail System hem o l ra t 1 g e r Lebanon k u o e 2 r n t u E and the Metacomet Ridge System o a 6 6 g n Cro r w m a S Southington w Berlin h o V 7 ell F Wolcott s n 1 b h New Milford o t are designated Greenways.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Adopted Budget
    2013-2014 ADOPTED BUDGET MARK D. BOUGHTON, MAYOR CITY OF DANBURY CONNECTICUT CITY OF DANBURY 2013-2014 ADOPTED BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Page Number TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... i-iv General Government City Council ................................................................................................109-110 PREFACE Ordinances ....................................................................................................... 110 City Description ..................................................................................................... v Mayor’s Office .............................................................................................111-112 City History....................................................................................................... vi-vii Annual Report ................................................................................................... 113 GFOA Budget Award ...........................................................................................viii Mayor’s Discretionary Fund ............................................................................... 113 City Memberships ............................................................................................. 113 MAYOR’S MESSAGE Legislative Assistant....................................................................................114-115 Citywide Mission Statement ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 135+ Organizations Supporting Constitutional Amendment to Protect Public Lands in CT
    135+ Organizations Supporting Constitutional Amendment to Protect Public Lands in CT Appalachian Mountain Club ARTFARM Avalonia Land Conservancy Aspetuck Land Trust Audubon CT Backcountry Hunters & Anglers Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council (BLEC) Bethany Land Trust Bethel Land Trust Branford Land Trust Candlewood Valley Regional Land Trust Caretakers of Soapstone Mountain Cheshire Horse Council Chester Conservation Commission Citizens Campaign for the Environment (CCE) Clean Water Action - CT Clinton Land Conservation Trust Colchester Land Trust Colebrook Land Conservancy Connecticut Association of Conservation and Inland Wetlands Commissions (CACIWC) Connecticut Association of Wetland Scientists (CAWS) Connecticut Audubon Society Connecticut Botanical Society Connecticut College Arboretum Connecticut Farmland Trust (CFT) Connecticut Forest & Park Association (CFPA) Connecticut Fund for the Environment/Save The Sound (CFE/STS) Connecticut Horse Council Connecticut Land Conservation Council (CLCC) Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV) Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District Connecticut River Gateway Commission Connecticut River Watershed Council Connecticut Trail Rides Association Connecticut Valley Driving Club Dark Entry Forest, Incorporated East Granby Land Trust Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Coordinating Committee (ERWSCC) Environment Connecticut Essex Land Trust Farmington River Watershed Association (FRWA) Friends
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2030 Regional Plan of Conservation and Development
    2020-2030 REGIONAL PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT WESTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2020-2030 Regional Plan of Conservation and Development Western Connecticut Council of Governments January 2020 The Plan was created under the leadership of: WestCOG Staff: Jayme Stevenson, Chairman, First Selectman, Town of Darien Francis Pickering, Executive Director Rudolph Marconi, Vice Chairman, First Selectman, Town of Michael Towle, Deputy Director Ridgefield Patricia Payne, Finance Director Lynne Vanderslice, Treasurer, First Selectman, Town of Wilton Victoria Ricks, Office Manager Julia Pemberton, Secretary, First Selectman, Town of Redding Kevin Mahoney, Senior Project Manager Matt Knickerbocker, First Selectman, Town of Bethel Kristin Hadjstylianos, Senior Planner Curtis Read, First Selectman, Town of Bridgewater Kristin Floberg, Planner Stephen Dunn, First Selectman, Town of Brookfield Nicole Sullivan, Associate Planner Mark Boughton, Mayor, City of Danbury Ariana Vera, Associate Planner Fred Camillo, First Selectman, Town of Greenwich Charles Vidich, Senior Project Manager Kevin Moynihan, First Selectman, Town of New Canaan Paula Burton, Project Manager Pat Del Monaco, First Selectman, Town of New Fairfield Nicholas Trabka, GIS Analyst Peter Bass, Mayor, Town of New Milford Special thanks to Jamie Bastian, Kendra Daniel Rosenthal, First Selectman, Town of Newtown Beaver, Sam Goater, William Kenny, Holly Parker, and Chadwick Schroeder. Harry Rilling, Mayor, City of Norwalk Don Lowe, First Selectman, Town of Sherman Western Connecticut Council of Governments David Martin, Mayor, City of Stamford 1 Riverside Road Christopher Spaulding, First Selectman, Town of Weston Sandy Hook, CT 06482 Jim Marpe, First Selectman, Town of Westport Phone: (475) 323‐2060 ENGLISH: For language assistance or other accommodations, contact Western Connecticut Council of Governments at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • TRAIL NEWS Volunteer Horse Patrol
    CT Horse Council TRAIL NEWS Volunteer Horse Patrol Summer 2011 Submitted by Diane Ciano Your CHC Representation around the state… CONNECTICUT HORSE COUNCIL VOLUNTEER HORSE PATROL CONNECTICUT EQUINE ADVISORY COUNCIL CONNECTICUT GREENWAYS COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Recreational Trails Program Advisory Board Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Advisory Board 1 Welcome New Volunteer Horse Patrol Coordinators and Members New VHP Coordinators: Heather Hicks has volunteered to be the Coordinator for the town owned parks and open spaces in the Granby Area that include Salmon River Park, Ethel Walker Woods, McCleans Game Refuge and Holcomb Farm as well as Stratton Brook State Park. Heather is from Southwick, MA and is a past president of the Granby Horse Council and has been active on several boards for many years. Heather‟s Patrol Horse is Arwen. Donna Freeman from Bethel has volunteered to be the Coordinator for Tarrywile Park in Danbury. She boards her horse at Happy Trails Farm in Danbury and patrols with several other VHP members from the farm out to the city park. Donna‟s Patrol Horse is Dusty. New VHP Members We have 13 new members for the Horse Patrol ! Reddington Rock Riding Club Members: Anicia B. Young- Johnny, Genuie & T.J. - Somers Ann Moses & Apache - Somers Monty Moses & Apache Bonny Herindeen – Lakota – Spanky & Sam - Willington Corinne Breyette & Pepper - Somers Danna Krzynowek - Abe & Bailey - Somers Gloria Coles - My Hollywood Dream “Megy” & Draw Yer Guns “Charlie”- Stafford Springs Gillis Gregoire - The True Mr. Brooks & Blue Chargabill - Willington Karen Gregoire – Rocket & Blue Chargabill - Willington Susan Taricani – Buddie & Dililah- Stafford Springs Pomfret Trails Association Members: Marybeth Gorke-Felice / Duke & Harry - Woodstock Audrey Oleary & Harry - Woodstock Maureen Hanink – Dolly & Jack - Ashford 2 Events gone by…… Several VHP members requested rides to learn new areas to patrol.
    [Show full text]