DOCSLIB.ORG

Participatory Asset Mapping in the Lake Victoria Basin of Kenya Michael Martin, Brianne Peters, and Jon Corbett

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Participatory Asset Mapping in the Lake Victoria Basin of Kenya Michael Martin, Brianne Peters, and Jon Corbett MARK YOUR CALENDAR! GIS-Prost 2013 URISA's 51 Annual Conference for GIS Professionals need new colors Join us in Providence, Rhode Island for GIS-Pro 2013: URISA’s 51st Annual Conference for GIS Professionals September 16-19, 2013 Submit an abstract, share your research and ideas! Volume 25 • No. 2 • 2012 Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association CONTENTS 5 Introduction to Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Special Issue Special Guest Editors: Michelle M. Thompson and Kelly D. Owens 7 Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for Regional and Environmental Planning: Reflections on a Decade of Empirical Research Greg Brown 19 Innovative Public Participatory GIS Methodologies Adopted to Deal with the Social Impact Assessment Process Challenges: A Sri Lankan Experience Ram Alagan and Seela Aladuwaka 33 Analyzing Perceptions of Inequalities in Rural Areas of England Using a Mixed- methods Approach Steve Cinderby, Annemarieke de Bruin, Piran White, and Meg Huby 45 Participatory Asset Mapping in the Lake Victoria Basin of Kenya Michael Martin, Brianne Peters, and Jon Corbett 57 Increasing Access to and Use of Geospatial Data by Municipal Government and Citizens: The Process of “Geomatization” in Rural Québec Peter A. Johnson and Renee E. Sieber 65 Active Transportation, Citizen Engagement and Livability: Coupling Citizens and Smartphones to Make the Change Marc Schlossberg, Cody Evers, Ken Kato, and Christo Brehm 75 Web-based PPGIS for Wilhelmsburg, Germany: An Integration of Interactive GIS-based Maps with an Online Questionnaire Alenka Poplin Journal Publisher: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Piyushimita (Vonu) Thakuriah Special Issue Editors: Michelle M. Thompson Kelly D. Owens Journal Coordinator: Wendy Nelson Electronic Journal: http://www.urisa.org/urisajournal EDITORIAL OFFICE: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 701 Lee Street, Suite 680, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016; Voice (847) 824-6300; Fax (847) 824-6363; E-mail [email protected]. SUBMISSIONS: This publication accepts from authors an exclusive right of first publication to their article plus an accompanying grant of non- exclusive full rights. The publisher requires that full credit for first publication in the URISA Journal is provided in any subsequent electronic or print publications. For more information, the “Manuscript Submission Guidelines for Refereed Articles” is available on our website, www.urisa. org, or by calling (847) 824-6300. SUBSCRIPTION AND ADVERTISING: All correspondence about advertising, subscriptions, and URISA memberships should be directed to: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 701 Lee Street, Suite 680, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016; Voice (847) 824-6300; Fax (847) 824-6363; E-mail [email protected]. URISA Journal is published two times a year by the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association. © 2012 by the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by permission of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association. Educational programs planned and presented by URISA provide attendees with relevant and rewarding continuing education experience. However, neither the content (whether written or oral) of any course, seminar, or other presentation, nor the use of a specific product in conjunction there- with, nor the exhibition of any materials by any party coincident with the educational event, should be construed as indicating endorsement or approval of the views presented, the products used, or the materials exhibited by URISA, or by its committees, Special Interest Groups, Chapters, or other commissions. SUBSCRIPTION RATE: One year: $295 business, libraries, government agencies, and public institutions. Individuals interested in subscriptions should contact URISA for membership information. US ISSN 1045-8077 2 URISA Journal • Vol. 24, No. 2 • 2012 EDITORIAL BOARD Francis J. Harvey, Department of Geography, URISA Journal Editor Editorial Board University of Minnesota Editor-in-Chief Bin Jiang, University of Gävle, Sweden Dr. Piyushimita (Vonu) Thakuriah, Department Jochen Albrecht, Hunter College Richard Klosterman, Department of Geography of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois and Planning, University of Akron at Chicago Peggy Agouris, Center for Earth Observing and Space Research, George Mason University, Jeremy Mennis, Department of Geography and Virginia Urban Studies, Temple University David Arctur, Open Geospatial Consortium Thematic Editors: Nancy von Meyer, GISP, Fairview Industries Michael Batty, Centre for Advanced Spatial Harvey J. Miller, Department of Geography, Analysis, University College London (United University of Utah Sustainability Analysis and Decision Kingdom) Support Systems: Zorica Nedovic-Budic, School of Geography, Timothy Nyerges, University of Washington Kate Beard, Department of Spatial Information Planning and Environmental Policy, University Science and Engineering, University of Maine Participatory GIS and Related Applications: College, Dublin (Ireland) Laxmi Ramasubramanian, Hunter College Yvan Bédard, Centre for Research in Geomatics, Timothy Nyerges, University of Washington, Laval University (Canada) Social, Economic, Governance and Political Department of Geography, Seattle Sciences: Itzhak Benenson, Department of Geography, Harlan Onsrud, Spatial Information Science Francis Harvey, University of Minnesota Tel Aviv University (Israel) and Engineering, University of Maine GIScience: Al Butler, GISP, Milepost Zero Zhong-Ren Peng, Department of Urban and Harvey Miller, University of Utah Barbara P. Buttenfield, Department of Regional Planning, University of Florida Urban and Regional Systems and Modeling: Geography, University of Colorado Laxmi Ramasubramanian, Hunter College, Itzhak Benenson, Tel Aviv University Keith C. Clarke, Department of Geography, Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, University of California-Santa Barbara New York City David Coleman, Department of Geodesy and Carl Reed, Open Geospatial Consortium Geomatics Engineering, University of New Claus Rinner, Department of Geography, Brunswick (Canada) Ryerson University (Canada) Paul Cote, Graduate School of Design, Harvard Monika Sester, Institute of Cartography and University Geoinformatics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, David J. Cowen, Department of Geography, Germany University of South Carolina David Tulloch, Department of Landscape William J. Craig, GISP, Center for Urban and Architecture, Rutgers University Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota Stephen J. Ventura, Department of Robert G. Cromley, Department of Geography, Environmental Studies and Soil Science, University of Connecticut University of Wisconsin-Madison Michael Gould, Environmental Systems Barry Wellar, Department of Geography, Research Institute University of Ottawa (Canada) Klaus Greve, Department of Geography, Lyna Wiggins, Department of Planning, University of Bonn (Germany) Rutgers University Daniel A. Griffith, Geographic Information F. Benjamin Zhan, Department of Geography, Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas Texas State University-San Marcos URISA Journal • Vol. 24, No. 2 • 2012 3 Introduction to Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Special Issue Less than 25 years ago, the collective wisdom of university entrepre- same platform. Essentially, these developments have helped to create neurs recognized a more robust and sustainable means to advance a new era, if not a new PPGIS. knowledge by combining resources of community organizations, Interestingly, the advances in these technologies and integra- municipal departments, and academia. As a result, Public Partici- tion with planning are associated more with developed countries, pation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) has significantly and in particular North America, although it was in Africa that the increased the capacity to identify community desires, convey mu- idea of evaluating space, time and resources was “invented” through nicipal plans, and leverage university resources. Within the last five trade (Lacroix 1998). The Roman Empire is recognized as defining years, technology has departed from a mostly exclusive process that much of modern mapping language before it was documented in shielded public information through proprietary software to open Western Europe. As such, our collection of articles provides a broad data and spatial formats not previously accessible at the neighbor- survey of PPGIS application across the globe. This special issue hood or regional scale. Municipal budgets are now earmarking of the URISA journal presents local to regional and national to more technology dollars and increasing the capacity for locales to international applications that inform the new PPGIS. bolster infrastructure and drive programs. With the availability of Our survey begins with a comprehensive evaluation of PPGIS as spatially-enabled websites from the federal, state and local levels, a utility for environmental planning. Greg Brown questions whether costs are further reduced and access is significantly increased. These the public is equitably represented and what constitutes participation in factors have dramatically shifted us in the direction of providing PPGIS. He discovers top-down ideology as the barrier to the capacity a better picture of neighborhood demographics and to evaluate of PPGIS to move from a simply smart
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Participatory Geographic Information Systems and Land Planning Life Experiences for People Empowerment and Community Transforma
    PARTICIPATORY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND LAND PLANNING LIFE EXPERIENCES FOR PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT AND COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION FRANÇOISE ORBAN-FERAUGE FUNDP, NAMUR, BELGIUM [email protected] In collaboration with V.Aguilar, E. Alarcon, A. Carmona, N. Daix, B. Denil, A. Ignacio, J. Martinez, M. McCall, G.Miscione, E. Olivarez, M. Pandan. G. Rambaldi, R. Teruel, J. Verplanke 1 « I cannot think for others, through others, without others” (P.Freire) To Abet, Ana, Andres, Ating, Barbara, Baudouin, Belle, Bernard, Cesar, Cherie, Ching, Denise, Frédérique, Gérard, Gussy, Eric, Gwénaël, Ian, Iris, Jean-Paul, Jo, Joel, John-Paul, Julie, Laurent, Lito, Liza, Louie, Minmin, Mummy, Nenita, Nicolas, Nilo, Noel, Ophélie, Pedro, Pierre, Popoy, Rachel, Riggs, Rita, Robert, Romy, Roni, Ross, Sabine, Sharon, Stéphane, Sylvia, Terai, Vincent, Vir, Weng, Yvan. Thank you for your sharing. Thank you for your friendship. Thank you for embracing our common cause. Françoise 2 Preface .............................................................................................................................................6 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................8 Chapter 1. Concepts and Methods ...............................................................................................10 1.1. History.............................................................................................................................10 1.1.1. Participatory
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Volunteered Geographic Information
    16 Volunteered Geographic Information Serena Coetzee, South Africa 16.1 Introduction In its early days the World Wide Web contained static read-only information. It soon evolved into an interactive platform, known as Web.2.0, where content is added and updated all the time. Blogging, wikis, video sharing and social media are examples of Web.2.0. This type of content is referred to as user-generated content. Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is a special kind of user-generated content. It refers to geographic information collected and shared voluntarily by the general public. Web.2.0 and associated advances in web mapping technologies have greatly enhanced the abilities to collect, share and interact with geographic information online, leading to VGI. Crowdsourcing is the method of accomplishing a task, such as problem solving or the collection of information, by an open call for contributions. Instead of appointing a person or company to collect information, contributions from individuals are integrated in order to accomplish the task. Contributions are typically made online through an interactive website. Figure 16.1 The OpenStreetMap map page. In the subsequent sub-sections, examples of crowdsourcing and volunteered geographic information establishment and growth of OpenStreetMap have been devices, aerial photography, and other free sources. This are described, namely OpenStreetMap, Tracks4Africa, restrictions on the use or availability of geospatial crowdsourced data is then made available under the the Southern African Bird Atlas Project.2 and Wikimapia. information across much of the world and the advent of Open Database License. The site is supported by the In the additional sub-sections a step-by-step guide to inexpensive portable satellite navigation devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science Or Volunteered Geographic Information? the Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information Linda See 1,*, Peter Mooney 2, Giles Foody 3, Lucy Bastin 4, Alexis Comber 5, Jacinto Estima 6, Steffen Fritz 1, Norman Kerle 7, Bin Jiang 8, Mari Laakso 9, Hai-Ying Liu 10, Grega Milˇcinski 11, Matej Nikšiˇc 12, Marco Painho 6, Andrea P˝odör 13, Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond 14 and Martin Rutzinger 15 1 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg A2361, Austria; [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science, Maynooth University, Maynooth W23 F2H6, Ireland; [email protected] 3 School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; [email protected] 5 School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; [email protected] 6 NOVA IMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] (J.E.); [email protected] (M.P.) 7 Department of Earth Systems Analysis, ITC/University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands; [email protected] 8 Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Division of GIScience, University of Gävle, Gävle 80176, Sweden; [email protected] 9 Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, Kirkkonummi 02430, Finland; mari.laakso@nls.fi 10 Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Kjeller 2027, Norway; [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping and Argument Mapping: What Are the Differences and Do They Matter?
    Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping and Argument Mapping: What are the Differences and Do They Matter? W. Martin Davies The University of Melbourne, Australia [email protected] Abstract: In recent years, academics and educators have begun to use software mapping tools for a number of education-related purposes. Typically, the tools are used to help impart critical and analytical skills to students, to enable students to see relationships between concepts, and also as a method of assessment. The common feature of all these tools is the use of diagrammatic relationships of various kinds in preference to written or verbal descriptions. Pictures and structured diagrams are thought to be more comprehensible than just words, and a clearer way to illustrate understanding of complex topics. Variants of these tools are available under different names: “concept mapping”, “mind mapping” and “argument mapping”. Sometimes these terms are used synonymously. However, as this paper will demonstrate, there are clear differences in each of these mapping tools. This paper offers an outline of the various types of tool available and their advantages and disadvantages. It argues that the choice of mapping tool largely depends on the purpose or aim for which the tool is used and that the tools may well be converging to offer educators as yet unrealised and potentially complementary functions. Keywords: Concept mapping, mind mapping, computer-aided argument mapping, critical thinking, argument, inference-making, knowledge mapping. 1. INTRODUCTION The era of computer-aided mapping tools is well and truly here. In the past five to ten years, a variety of software packages have been developed that enable the visual display of information, concepts and relations between ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Utilization of Crowdsourcing And
    ABSTRACT UTILIZATION OF CROWDSOURCING AND VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IN INTERNATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT by Julaiti Nilupaer Large-scale disasters result in enormous impacts on vulnerable communities worldwide, and data acquisition has become a major concern in this time-critical situation: the limitations of geospatial technologies impede the real-time data collection, also the absent or poor data collection in some regions. With the current advances of Web 2.0, crowdsourcing and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) have become commonly used. As a potential solution to fill the gap of real-time geographic data, crowdsourcing and VGI enable timely information exchange through a voluntary approach and enhance amateur citizen participation. Importantly, such geographic information can substantially facilitate emergency coordination by fulfilling the needs of impacted communities and appropriately allocating relief supplies and funds. My research interest centers on the utilization of crowdsourcing and VGI for disaster management. Particularly, I work to explore their potential value and contributions by reviewing two notable and destructive disaster events as case studies: the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, and the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan. In addition, I examine the challenges of this information and seek potential solutions. This research aims to contribute a comprehensive qualitative analysis of how Volunteer and Technical Communities (V&TCs) have used crowdsourced data and VGI to enhance the coordination of disaster management.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteered and Crowdsourced Geographic Information: the Openstreetmap Project
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE Number 20 (2020), pp. 65–70 doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2020.20.659 INVITED ARTICLE Volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information: the OpenStreetMap project Michela Bertolotto1, Gavin McArdle1, and Bianca Schoen-Phelan2 1School of Computer Science, University College Dublin 2School of Computer Science, Technological University Dublin Received: February 28, 2020; accepted: May 12, 2020 Abstract: Advancements in technology over the last two decades have changed how spa- tial data are created and used. In particular, in the last decade, volunteered geographic information (VGI), i.e., the crowdsourcing of geographic information, has revolutionized the spatial domain by shifting the map-making process from the hands of experts to those of any willing contributor. Started in 2004, OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the pinnacle of VGI due to the large number of volunteers involved and the volume of spatial data generated. While the original objective of OSM was to create a free map of the world, its uses have shown how the potential of such an initiative goes well beyond map-making: ranging from projects such as the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap (HOT) project, that understands itself as a bridge between the OSM community and humanitarian responders, to collaborative projects such as Mapillary, where citizens take street-level images and the system aims to automate mapping. A common trend among these projects using OSM is the fact that the community dynamic tends to create spin-off projects. Currently, we see a drive towards projects that support sustainability goals using OSM. We discuss some such applications and highlight challenges posed by this new paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogeography and the Delusion of Democratisation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Haklay, M. (2013), Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. The definitive, peer- reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning A 2013, 45(1), 55 – 69 doi:10.1068/a45184 Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation Mordechai (Muki) Haklay Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering UCL Gower St., London, WC1E 6BT United Kingdom [email protected] 1 Haklay, M. (2013), Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. The definitive, peer- reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning A 2013, 45(1), 55 – 69 doi:10.1068/a45184 Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation Abstract Within the academic and popular discussion of neogeography, it is routinely argued that the process of producing and using geographical information has been fundamentally democratised. Neogeography, in contrast to ‘established geography’, especially uses the argument that it is for anyone, anywhere and anytime. Similar arguments have been used to praise the growth in Web GIS since the mid-1990s and seem to be persistent in the conceptualisation of these technologies. However, what is the nature of this democracy, and to what extent do the technologies that are used in neogeography fulfil this democratisation promise? In this contribution, the framework offered by Andrew Feenberg in his critical theory of technology, and especially his call for ‘deep democratisation’, is used to provide a critique of these assertions of the nature of neogeography. The analysis shows that, unlike early critical GIS and the literature on participatory GIS, the analysis of neogeography adopted an instrumentalist interpretation of the technology and its applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Mapping Response To
    AMBIENTE M. Minghini* Collaborative mapping L. Delucchi** A. Sarretta*** response to disasters through F. Lupia**** M. Napolitano***** openstreetmap: the case of A. Palmas****** the 2016 italian earthquake * Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Milano, Italy ** Fondazione Edmund Mach, Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Digital humanitarians represent the current generation of volunteers, providing timely contributions Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, in the form of digital map data in the aftermath of natural disasters. Starting from the tragic 2010 San Michele all’Adige, Italy earthquake in Haiti and thanks to the success of the OpenStreetMap (OSM) project, the presence *** Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche and coordination of these volunteers have grown incredibly over the past years. This work investiga- (CNR) – Istituto di Scienze Marine tes the dynamics of the mapping process and the nature of the OSM volunteers who contributed (ISMAR), Venezia, Italy map data after the 2016 earthquake in Central Italy. The analyses show that existing OSM users **** Consiglio per la ricerca were the majority of those contributing to the mapping activity, with less edits performed by new in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia users. The collaborative mapping process was efficiently coordinated through a dedicated platform agraria, Roma, Italy and the area hit by the earthquake was significantly edited in OSM after the disaster. ***** Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Keywords: collaborative mapping, disaster management, earthquake, OpenStreetMap Trento, Italy ****** Wikimedia Italia, Milano, Italy Risposta collaborativa alla mappatura di eventi disastrosi tramite openstreetmap: il caso del terremoto in italia del 2016. I digital humanitarians rappresentano la nuova genera- zione di volontari, capaci di fornire contributi tempestivi sotto forma di dati geografici all’indomani di org), the world’s openly-licensed disastri naturali.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigm Shift in How People Interact with Media
    THE PARSONS INSTITUTE 68 Fifth Avenue 212 229 6825 FOR INFORMATION MAPPING New York, NY 10011 piim.newschool.edu Paradigm Shift in How People Interact with Media MI-SUN KIM, BFA KEYWORDS Data visualization, information graphics, interactive media, news graphics, reader participation URL http://infographics.chosun.com/ ABSTRACT Today’s newsreaders seek to effectively extract accurate and trustworthy information from the over- whelming flood of available media. Various mass media organizations have contributed considerable effort to meet Figure 1: InfoGraphics, Chosun.com: three aspects of these readers’ expectations. Such effort has also created media are composed together, these include information, a uniquely competitive marketing endeavor to find new graphics, and news. methods of presentation. After over two years of thorough preparations and strategic trials focused on meeting read- Presenting news content through information graphics ers’ needs, Chosun.com officially launched InfoGraphics to enhances the storytelling process, however, our objective provide highly compelling presentations of news through is to go beyond this to present more highly sophisticated the paradigm of information visualization (Figure 1). news content. Creating quality information graphics Chosun.com is one of the leading news websites in South requires a more thorough analyses and reconstruction of Korea; it is affiliated with The Chosun Ilbo (Korea Daily content. The process entails the comprehensive collection News), the largest and most read newspaper in South of the core information, as well as its contextual informa- Korea (Figure 2, next page). tion and related social issues. Therefore, when we present The term InfoGraphics, as used by Chosun.com, seeks our information graphics, we need to synchronize the core to combine the following three media aspects: informa- information with rich contextual issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: a Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake
    World Medical & Health Policy www.psocommons.org/wmhp Vol. 2: Iss. 2, Article 2 (2010) Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake Matthew Zook, PhD, University of Kentucky Mark Graham, PhD, University of Oxford Taylor Shelton, BA, University of Kentucky Sean Gorman, PhD, FortiusOne Abstract This paper outlines the ways in which information technologies (ITs) were used in the Haiti relief effort, especially with respect to web-based mapping services. Although there were numerous ways in which this took place, this paper focuses on four in particular: CrisisCamp Haiti, OpenStreetMap, Ushahidi, and GeoCommons. This analysis demonstrates that ITs were a key means through which individuals could make a tangible difference in the work of relief and aid agencies without actually being physically present in Haiti. While not without problems, this effort nevertheless represents a remarkable example of the power and crowdsourced online mapping and the potential for new avenues of interaction between physically distant places that vary tremendously. Keywords: Haiti, OpenStreetMap, Ushahidi, GeoCommons, volunteered geographic information, crowdsourcing Author Notes: Conflicts of interest: Sean Gorman is employed by FortiusOne Inc. which built the GeoCommons community. He also helped with supporting CrisisCommons, participates in the OpenStreetMap project, and has participated in Ushahidi implementations in Afghanistan and Haiti. Most of the figures in this article are screenshots of publicly available websites and do not require permissions. In all cases the sources are acknowledged. © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 7 - Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2216649 World Medical & Health Policy, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement
    Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement Sukumar Ganapati Assistant Professor Public Administration Department School of International and Public Affairs College of Arts and Sciences Florida International University E-Government/Technology Series 2 0 1 0 E-GOVERNMENT/TECHNOLOGY SERIES Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement Sukumar Ganapati Assistant Professor Public Administration Department School of International and Public Affairs College of Arts and Sciences Florida International University TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..............................................................................................4 Executive Summary ..............................................................................6 Introduction: Evolution of Geographic Information Systems ...............9 First Wave: Desktop GIS ...................................................................9 Second Wave: Web GIS .................................................................10 Third Wave: Geospatial Web 2.0 Platform .....................................11 Citizen-Oriented Geospatial Web 2.0 e-Government Applications ...13 Citizen-Oriented Transit Information ..............................................13 Citizen Relationship Management ..................................................15 Citizen-Volunteered Geographic Information .................................18 Citizen Participation in Planning and Decision Making ................21 The Future of GIS-Enabled Citizen Participation in Decision
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory GIS in Design of the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Campus Web Map and Spatial Analysis of Campus Area Quality
    E3S Web of Conferences 29, 00025 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182900025 XVIIth Conference of PhD Students and Young Scientists Participatory GIS in design of the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology campus web map and spatial analysis of campus area quality Jan Blachowski1,*, Jakub Łuczak1, and Paulina Zagrodnik1 1Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, 27 Wyb. Wyspianskiego St., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland Abstract. Public participation geographic information system (GIS) and participatory mapping data collection methods are means that enhance capacity in generating, managing, and communicating spatial information in various fields ranging from local planning to environmental management. In this study these methods have been used in two ways. The first one, to gather information on the additional functionality of campus web map expected by its potential users, i.e. students, staff and visitors, through web based survey. The second, to collect geographically referenced information on campus areas that are liked and disliked in a geo-survey carried out with ArcGIS Online GeoForm Application. The results of the first survey were used to map facilities such as: bicycle infrastructure, building entrances, wheelchair accessible infrastructure and benches. The results of the second one, to analyse the most and the least attractive parts of the campus with heat and hot spot analyses in GIS. In addition, the answers have been studied with regard to the visual and functional aspects of campus area raised in the survey. The thematic layers developed in the results of field mapping and geoprocessing of geosurvey data were included in the campus web map project.
    [Show full text]