Abstract Utilization of Crowdsourcing And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Google Testimony Homeland Security Crisis Response Hearing 5-5-2011
Testimony of Shona L. Brown, Senior Vice President, Google.org Before the Senate Homeland Security Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Disaster Recovery and Intergovernmental Affairs Hearing on “Understanding the Power of Social Media as a Communication Tool in the Aftermath of Disasters” May 5, 2011 Chairman Pryor, Ranking Member Brown, and Members of the Committee. Thank you for your focus on the important issue of crisis response and the central role that technology now plays in disaster relief and recovery. During the past year, tens of millions of people around the world have suffered through natural disasters such as earthquakes in Haiti, Japan, Chile, China, and New Zealand; floods in Pakistan and Australia; and forest fires in Israel. Our own citizens have faced crises, with tornadoes and floods causing terrible damage in recent weeks reminding us of the toll natural disasters have on human life. Our thoughts are with the communities that have just been hit by devastating tornadoes in Alabama and across the US. As the Senior Vice President of Google.org, the philanthropic arm of Google, which includes the team that responds to natural disasters around the world, I have seen the increasing importance of Internet-based technologies in crisis response. Our team has used search and geographic-based tools to respond to over 20 crises in over 10 languages since Hurricane Katrina, and we have already responded to more crises in 2011 than we did all of last year. In the aftermath of the devastating tornadoes in Alabama last week, we supported the Red Cross by providing maps that locate nearby shelters, updated satellite imagery for first responders, and directed local users searching for “tornado” or “twister” to the maps through an enhanced search result. -
The Power of Virtual Globes for Valorising Cultural Heritage and Enabling Sustainable Tourism: Nasa World Wind Applications
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-4/W2, 2013 ISPRS WebMGS 2013 & DMGIS 2013, 11 – 12 November 2013, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China Topics: Global Spatial Grid & Cloud-based Services THE POWER OF VIRTUAL GLOBES FOR VALORISING CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ENABLING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM: NASA WORLD WIND APPLICATIONS M. A. Brovelli a , P. Hogan b , M. Minghini a , G. Zamboni a a Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Laboratorio di Geomatica, Como Campus, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA - [email protected] Commission IV, Working Group IV/5 KEY WORDS: Cultural Heritage, GIS, Three-dimensional, Virtual Globe, Web based ABSTRACT: Inspired by the visionary idea of Digital Earth, as well as from the tremendous improvements in geo-technologies, use of virtual globes has been changing the way people approach to geographic information on the Web. Unlike the traditional 2D-visualization typical of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), virtual globes offer multi-dimensional, fully-realistic content visualization which allows for a much richer user experience. This research investigates the potential for using virtual globes to foster tourism and enhance cultural heritage. The paper first outlines the state of the art for existing virtual globes, pointing out some possible categorizations according to license type, platform-dependence, application type, default layers, functionalities and freedom of customization. Based on this analysis, the NASA World Wind virtual globe is the preferred tool for promoting tourism and cultural heritage. -
Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8. -
Next-Gen Technology Transformation in Financial Services
April 2020 Next-gen Technology transformation in Financial Services Introduction Financial Services technology is currently in the midst of a profound transformation, as CIOs and their teams prepare to embrace the next major phase of digital transformation. The challenge they face is significant: in a competitive environment of rising cost pressures, where rapid action and response is imperative, financial institutions must modernize their technology function to support expanded digitization of both the front and back ends of their businesses. Furthermore, the current COVID-19 situation is putting immense pressure on technology capabilities (e.g., remote working, new cyber-security threats) and requires CIOs to anticipate and prepare for the “next normal” (e.g., accelerated shift to digital channels). Most major financial institutions are well aware of the imperative for action and have embarked on the necessary transformation. However, it is early days—based on our experience, most are only at the beginning of their journey. And in addition to the pressures mentioned above, many are facing challenges in terms of funding, complexity, and talent availability. This collection of articles—gathered from our recent publishing on the theme of financial services technology—is intended to serve as a roadmap for executives tasked with ramping up technology innovation, increasing tech productivity, and modernizing their platforms. The articles are organized into three major themes: 1. Reimagine the role of technology to be a business and innovation partner 2. Reinvent technology delivery to drive a step change in productivity and speed 3. Future-proof the foundation by building flexible and secure platforms The pace of change in financial services technology—as with technology more broadly—leaves very little time for leaders to respond. -
Mapping Citizen Engagement in the Process of Social Innovation
Mapping citizen engagement in the process of social innovation 24 September 2012 Deliverable 5.1 of the FP7-project: TEPSIE (290771) Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of our partners in the TEPSIE consortium for their comments on this paper, and particularly their suggestions of relevant examples of citizen engagement. Suggested citation Davies, A, Simon, J, Patrick, R and Norman, W. (2012) ‘Mapping citizen engagement in the process of social innovation’. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research TEPSIE TEPSIE is a research project funded under the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme and is an acronym for “The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe”. The project is a research collaboration between six European institutions led by the Danish Technological Institute and the Young Foundation and runs from 2012-2015. Date: 24 September 2012 TEPSIE deliverable no: 5.1 Authors: Anna Davies, Julie Simon, Robert Patrick and Will Norman Lead partner: The Young Foundation Participating partners: Danish Technological Institute, University of Heidelberg, Atlantis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Wroclaw Research Centre EIT+ Contact person: Julie Simon The Young Foundation [email protected] +44 8980 6263 2 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... -
Harnessing Connection Technologies for Development
Harnessing Connection Technologies for Development Anne-Marie Slaughter, Bert G. Kerstetter ‘66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University Eleanor Meegoda, former Student, Princeton University; current Princeton Project 55 Fellow, Rockefeller Foundation The development field is exploding with the potential of new technologies, from the wireless revolution to the digitization of just about everything: words, sounds, images and geography itself. The ability to connect individuals to the knowledge and resources they need electronically—without roads, schoolhouses, clinics or corrupt government bureaucracies—seems too good to be true, and sometimes is. Communication technologies, which are really better described as connection technologies, are a part of this larger technological revolution. he most basic connection technologies are new friends, playing games, sharing stories and cell phones, which exist to allow people to useful information). communicate to one another, and the Internet, T As connection technologies, these media not only grant which can be accessed through Internet cafes, people easy communication access to one another but home access or smart phones. Once connected to also permit greater reciprocity in relationships among the Internet, additional technologies, in the form of development thinkers, service deliverers and beneficiaries. specific software, allow individuals to connect with The rise of blogs, Twitter and crowd-sourcing Web sites each other in a variety of prescribed ways -
The Role of Business in Disaster Response a Business Civic Leadership Report BCLC Is an Affilliate of the U.S
The Role of Business in Disaster Response A Business Civic Leadership Report BCLC is an affilliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Role of Business in Disaster Response Introduction Information Technology S 2 Business Civic Leadership Center 30 Cisco Corporate Expertise in Disasters Using Expert Networking Knowledge to Assist T Communities in Crisis Resilience 32 IBM Preparedness Beyond Search & Rescue: Improving Disaster Zone’s Long-Term Prospects 6 Office Depot Talking About Preparedness: EN 34 Google Leave No Stone Unturned Google’s Crisis Response Initiative 8 Citi T 36 Microsoft Natural Disaster Financial Management: Increasing Information and Technology Capacity It’s All About Precrisis Preparation in Times of Disaster 10 Shell A Strategic Approach to Response and Recovery Insurance 40 Allstate A Promise to Our Communities Is Our Business Public-Private Partnership CON 14 Maryland Emergency Management Agency Infrastructure F Maryland Businesses Get Their Stake in 44 Degenkolb Engineers Emergency Response Degenkolb’s 70-Year Tradition of Earthquake Chasing Lessons Learned 16 Walmart Public-Private Collaboration: Six Years 46 Proteus On-Demand After Hurricane Katrina Learn From the Past, Be Involved in the Future E O 48 Project Jomo Storm of Ideas Logistics L 20 UPS We Love the Logistics of Disaster Response Debris Removal 22 FedEx 52 Caterpillar Logistics Support During Disasters: Changing Lives Through Sustainable Progress Another Day at the Office 54 Ceres Environmental TAB Helping Jefferson County Recover Food 26 Cargill An Unprecedented Crisis in the Horn of Africa Prompts an Extraordinary Response From Cargill bclc.uschamber.com 2012 • 1 INTRODUCTION Corporate Expertise in Disasters By Stephen Jordan and Gerald McSwiggan, U.S. -
35 - VGI and Beyond: from Data to Mapping
Antoniou, V., Capineri, C. and Haklay, M., 2018. VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping. in: A.J. Kent and P. Vujakovic (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 475 - 488 35 - VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping Vyron Antoniou, Cristina Capineri and Muki (Mordechai) Haklay This chapter will introduce the concept of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) within practices of mapping and cartography. Our aim is to provide an accessible overview of the area, which has grown rapidly in the past decade, but first we need to define what we mean by VGI. Defining VGI In a seminal paper published in 2007, Mike Goodchild coined the term Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in an effort to describe ‘the widespread engagement of large numbers of private citizens, often with little in the way of formal qualifications, in the creation of geographic information’ (Goodchild, 2007: 217). At that point, rudimentary crowdsourced Geographic Information (GI) was created and disseminated freely with the help of innovative desktop applications (e.g. Google Earth) or web-based platforms (e.g. Wikimapia, OpenStreetMap). By crowdsourcing we refer to the action of multiple participants (sometimes thousands or even millions) in the generation of geographical information, when these participants are external to the organization that manages the information and are not formally employed by it. Since then a lot has changed and VGI now has a deep and broad agenda that ranges from implicitly contributed GI through social networks to rigorously-monitored citizen science projects. However, before we continue the discussion on this subject, it is necessary to shed light onto the key factors that have helped to create this phenomenon. -
The Social Economy
McKinsey Global Institute McKinsey Global Institute The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies social through productivity and value Unlocking economy: The social July 2012 The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies The McKinsey Global Institute The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, was established in 1990 to develop a deeper understanding of the evolving global economy. Our goal is to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions. MGI research combines the disciplines of economics and management, employing the analytical tools of economics with the insights of business leaders. Our “micro-to-macro” methodology examines microeconomic industry trends to better understand the broad macroeconomic forces affecting business strategy and public policy. MGI’s in-depth reports have covered more than 20 countries and 30 industries. Current research focuses on six themes: productivity and growth; the evolution of global financial markets; the economic impact of technology and innovation; urbanization; the future of work; and natural resources. Recent reports have assessed job creation, resource productivity, cities of the future, and the impact of big data. MGI is led by three McKinsey & Company directors: Richard Dobbs, James Manyika, and Charles Roxburgh. Susan Lund serves as director of research. Project teams are led by a group of senior fellows and include consultants from McKinsey’s offices around the world. These teams draw on McKinsey’s global network of partners and industry and management experts. In addition, leading economists, including Nobel laureates, act as research advisers. -
Next-Generation Digital Earth
Next-generation Digital Earth Michael F. Goodchilda,1, Huadong Guob, Alessandro Annonic, Ling Biand, Kees de Biee, Frederick Campbellf, Max Cragliac, Manfred Ehlersg, John van Genderene, Davina Jacksonh, Anthony J. Lewisi, Martino Pesaresic, Gábor Remetey-Fülöppj, Richard Simpsonk, Andrew Skidmoref, Changlin Wangb, and Peter Woodgatel aDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; bCenter for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; cJoint Research Centre of the European Commission, 21027 Ispra, Italy; dDepartment of Geography, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14261; eFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands; fFred Campbell Consulting, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 5G8; gInstitute for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; hD_City Network, Newtown 2042, Australia; iDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; jHungarian Association for Geo-Information, H-1122, Budapest, Hungary; kNextspace, Auckland 1542, New Zealand; and lCooperative Research Center for Spatial Information, Carlton South 3053, Australia Edited by Kenneth Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved May 14, 2012 (received for review March 1, 2012) A speech of then-Vice President Al Gore in 1998 created a vision for a Digital Earth, and played a role in stimulating the development of a first generation of virtual globes, typified by Google Earth, that achieved many but not all the elements of this vision. The technical achievements of Google Earth, and the functionality of this first generation of virtual globes, are reviewed against the Gore vision. -
Inferring and Improving Street Maps with Data-Driven Automation
Inferring and Improving Street Maps with Data-Driven Automation Favyen Bastani1, Songtao He1, Satvat Jagwani1, Edward Park1, Sofiane Abbar2, Mohammad Alizadeh1, Hari Balakrishnan1, Sanjay Chawla2, Sam Madden1, Mohammad Amin Sadeghi, 1MIT CSAIL, ffavyen,songtao,satvat,parke,alizadeh,hari,[email protected], 2Qatar Computer Research Institute, fsabbar, [email protected] September 21, 2019 1 Introduction sulting the data. These data sources include satellite imagery, aerial imagery, and GPS trajectories (which Street maps help to inform a wide range of decisions. consist of sequences of GPS positions captured from Drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians rely on street maps moving vehicles). Although the data presented by for search and navigation. Rescue workers respond- these tools help users to update a map dataset, the ing to disasters like hurricanes, tsunamis, and earth- manual tracing and annotation process is cumber- quakes rely on street maps to understand where peo- some and a major bottleneck in map maintenance. ple are, and to locate individual buildings [23]. Trans- Over the past decade, many automatic map in- portation researchers rely on street maps to conduct ference systems have been proposed to automati- transportation studies, such as analyzing pedestrian cally extract information from these data sources at accessibility to public transport [25]. Indeed, with scale. Several approaches develop unsupervised clus- the need for accurate street maps growing in impor- tering and density thresholding algorithms to con- tance, companies are spending hundreds of millions struct road networks from GPS trajectory datasets [1, 1 of dollars to map roads globally . 4, 7, 16, 21]. Others apply machine learning meth- However, street maps are incomplete or lag behind ods to process satellite imagery and extract road net- new construction in many parts of the world. -
16 Volunteered Geographic Information
16 Volunteered Geographic Information Serena Coetzee, South Africa 16.1 Introduction In its early days the World Wide Web contained static read-only information. It soon evolved into an interactive platform, known as Web.2.0, where content is added and updated all the time. Blogging, wikis, video sharing and social media are examples of Web.2.0. This type of content is referred to as user-generated content. Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is a special kind of user-generated content. It refers to geographic information collected and shared voluntarily by the general public. Web.2.0 and associated advances in web mapping technologies have greatly enhanced the abilities to collect, share and interact with geographic information online, leading to VGI. Crowdsourcing is the method of accomplishing a task, such as problem solving or the collection of information, by an open call for contributions. Instead of appointing a person or company to collect information, contributions from individuals are integrated in order to accomplish the task. Contributions are typically made online through an interactive website. Figure 16.1 The OpenStreetMap map page. In the subsequent sub-sections, examples of crowdsourcing and volunteered geographic information establishment and growth of OpenStreetMap have been devices, aerial photography, and other free sources. This are described, namely OpenStreetMap, Tracks4Africa, restrictions on the use or availability of geospatial crowdsourced data is then made available under the the Southern African Bird Atlas Project.2 and Wikimapia. information across much of the world and the advent of Open Database License. The site is supported by the In the additional sub-sections a step-by-step guide to inexpensive portable satellite navigation devices.