DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of Divisions of the International Geologic Time Scale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status of Divisions of the International Geologic Time Scale Status of Divisions of the International Geologic Time Scale JAMES G. OGG Ogg, J.G. 2004 0615: Status of Divisions of the International Geologic Time Scale. Lethaia, Vol. 37, pp. 183±199. Oslo. ISSN 0024-1164. Each chronostratigraphic unit of the International Geologic Time Scale will be de®ned at its base by a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) or Global Standard Strati- graphic Age (GSSA). Nearly 50 GSSPs and 10 GSSAs have now been rati®ed. Ideally, the GSSP coincides with events having a global correlation potential. The international stage divisions of some systems, such as the Jurassic or Neogene, are similar to tradi- tional usage in European geology. However, in order to utilize global correlation hori- zons, the international stage divisions of other systems, such as the Ordovician or Per- mian, have required assembling new stage nomenclatures or hybrids of different regional stages. A reference table by the International Commission on Stratigraphy itemizes the current or potential GSSP and GSSA de®nitions of all international geolo- gic time units. & Cenozoic, chronostratigraphy, GSSP, Mesozoic, Paleozoic, Precambrian. James G. Ogg, [[email protected]], Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1397, USA Standardization of the International universal language of a `Standard' Geologic Time Geologic Time Scale Scale. Prominent regional lithologic characteristics in A major role of the International Commission on marginal marine facies were utilized for assigning Stratigraphy (ICS) is the establishment and publica- many of the historic stratotypes for system, series and tion of a standard global stratigraphic time scale. Each stage units, but their boundaries were often demarked formal unit of the Phanerozoic Era (542 Ma to by hiatuses. These facies shifts were commonly the Present) and latest Proterozoic (Ediacaran System/ local manifestation of a global environmental change, Period) will be de®ned by a Global Stratotype Section which was also accompanied by evolution or extinc- and Point (GSSP) at its base. The Archean and tion of biologic species, sea-level excursions, and Proterozoic eons of the Precambrian interval are redistributions in the carbon cycle. The GSSP concept subdivided by absolute age (Global Standard Strati- of high-precision correlation requires that the stage graphic Age, or GSSA). Names, ranks and GSSPs of the boundaries be assigned within continuous successions, global scale proposed by its subcommissions are but very few of the historical stratotypes qualify in this approved by the International Commission on Strati- regard. Therefore, the GSSPs are commonly selected in graphy and rati®ed by the International Union of deeper marine facies in which evolutionary events of Geological Sciences (IUGS). Each GSSP de®nes the semi-cosmopolitan pelagic fauna (conodonts, ammo- initiation of a geochronologic interval (geologic time noids, graptolites, planktonic foraminifers, certain units of `period', `epoch', etc.) and its corresponding types of trilobites, etc.) and/or carbon-isotope excur- chronostratigraphic interval (time-rock units of `sys- sions serve as primary correlation markers. Stable tem', `series', `stage', etc.). Even though a GSSP is a isotope excursions and magnetic reversals are pre- point within the rock record at a speci®c locality, its ferred secondary correlation markers, because these placement generally coincides with primary correla- events are globally synchronous and can be utilized in tion criteria based on important faunal, magnetic, deep marine to terrestrial sections. cycle and/or isotopic events that can be globally The great majority of rati®ed or potential GSSPs are correlated. The origin, philosophy and implications in western Europe (Fig. 1). This distribution mostly of the GSSP concept are explored in a companion re¯ects that the stratigraphic studies developed in paper by Walsh et al. (2004, this issue). The ICS has western Europe, but is also due to tectonic processes the mandate to complete all GSSPs for global divisions that kept western Europe in low-latitude shallow-sea of Earth history by 2008. When all Phanerozoic units environments for much of the Phanerozoic eon and are de®ned by GSSPs, then geo-history will have a have subsequently exposed the richly fossiliferous DOI 10.1080/00241160410006492 # 2004 Taylor & Francis 184 James G. Ogg LETHAIA 37 (2004) Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of rati®ed (diamonds) and candidate (squares) GSSPs on a present-day (0 Ma) map (status in Jan., 2004; see Table 1). Most of the GSSPs are in western Europe, where the clustering has overlapped many additional GSSPs. [This ®gure is modi®ed from a compilation by Alan Smith for Geologic Time Scale 2004] sections that were the basis of the historical compila- and of geochemical cycling. This is one of the main tions of the chronostratigraphic scale. Many of these goals of the different subcommissions of the Interna- GSSP levels are partially consistent with historical tional Commission on Stratigraphy. usage of stage terminology (e.g. the base-Cenomanian As of March 2004, approximately two-thirds of the GSSP de®ning the base of the Upper Cretaceous has 90 stage-level Phanerozoic divisions of the interna- not departed signi®cantly from the beginning of the tional geologic scale are de®ned by GSSPs at their Cenomanian Stage as assigned by Alcide d'Orbigny in boundaries, and primary correlation criteria have been 1847. Other GSSP levels de®ning stages have necessi- decided for GSSPs of most other stages. An itemized tated a revision of the historical usage (e.g. the base- summary of these GSSP placements and associated Triassic GSSP is signi®cantly younger than the major nomenclature for the chronostratigraphic units are mass extinction and geochemical anomalies that were provided in Tables 1 and 2, and are schematically formerly grouped as the `Permian/Triassic boundary shown in Figure 2. The current listing, including a events'). standardized description, map and stratigraphic col- Even though the international geologic scale is umn for each GSSP, is maintained at the ICS website de®ned with global events (when possible), numerous (www.stratigraphy.org). The estimated absolute age regional scales of traditional usage are built from local (Ma) for each stage boundary is from A Geologic Time signi®cant changes in sediment, paleoenvironment or Scale 2004 (Gradstein, et al. in press) and is summarized fossil characteristics. For example, the `Cincinnatian' in a companion paper by Gradstein & Ogg (2004, this is an upper Ordovician unit that has been used for issue). In general, the age for each GSSP horizon is over a century in the central part of USA. One must be extrapolated after calibrating a primary scale (e.g. able to easily and con®dently convert from these biostratigraphic zonation, marine magnetic anomaly traditional regional scales to the international stan- pattern) to selected radiometric ages. There is direct dard as de®ned by GSSPs, and to correlation among radiometric dating of only a few GSSPs (e.g. base- different regional scales. Indeed, this is the heart of Triassic, base-Turonian) or their primary correlation compiling a global Earth history ± how to relate the horizons (e.g. base-Cambrian, base-Jurassic, Cretac- well-documented successions of events in each region eous/Palaeogene boundary). However, orbital-climate to the other regions of the planet. Only in this way can `Milankovitch' cycles enable direct age assignments to geoscientists understand the intricate workings of several of the Neogene GSSP levels. evolution, of environmental cause-effect, of tectonics These brief summaries of the GSSP placements for LETHAIA 37 (2004) Divisions of the International Geologic Time Scale Fig. 2. The International Stratigraphic Chart for the Precambrian and Phanerozoic with rati®ed GSSPs (status in March 2004). The colours are the standard suite of the Commission for the 185 Geologic Map of the World (UNESCO). Updated versions of this ®gure can be downloaded from the website (www.stratigraphy.org) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy of IUGS. Table 1. Status as of March 2004 of GSSP and GSSA de®nitions for lower boundaries of international geologic stages, periods and eras. The background shading is the standard colour scale of the 186 US Geologic Survey. Updates of this compilation can be obtained from the website (www.stratigraphy.org) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy of IUGS. Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points (GSSPs) James G. Ogg Status in March 2004; see ICS website (www.stratigraphy.org) for updates EON, Era, System, Age (Ma) Est. GSSP and Series, Stage GTS2004 Æ myr Derivation of Age Principal correlative events location Status Publication PHANEROZOIC Cenozoic Era Neogene System The ªQuaternaryº is traditionally considered to be the interval of oscillating climatic extremes (glacial and interglacial episodes) that was initiated at about 2.6Ma, therefore encompasses the Holocene, Pleistocene and uppermost Pliocene. It is not a formal chronostratigraphic unit. Holocene Series base Holocene 11.5 ka 0.00 Carbon-14 dating exactly 10,000 Carbon-14 years Informal working calibration (= 11.5 ka calendar years BP) at the de®nition end of the Younger Dryas cold spell Pleistocene Series base Upper Pleistocene 0.1260.00 Astronomical cycles in base of the Eemian interglacial stage Potentially, within Informal working subseries sediments (= base of marine isotope stage 5e) sediment core
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Capitanian (Permian) Kamura Cooling Event
    Palaeoworld 16 (2007) 16–30 Research paper The Capitanian (Permian) Kamura cooling event: The beginning of the Paleozoic–Mesozoic transition Yukio Isozaki a,∗, Hodaka Kawahata b, Kayo Minoshima c a Department of Earth Science and Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan b Graduate School of Frontier Sciences and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Minamidai, Nakano, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan c Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan Received 4 January 2007; received in revised form 12 May 2007; accepted 15 May 2007 Available online 25 May 2007 Abstract 13 The Capitanian (late Guadalupian) high positive plateau interval of carbonate carbon isotope ratio (␦ Ccarb) was recognized lately in a mid-Panthalassan paleo-atoll limestone in Japan as the Kamura event. This unique episode in the late-middle Permian indicates high productivity in the low-latitude superocean likely coupled with resultant global cooling. This event ended shortly before the Guadalupian–Lopingian (middle-late Permian) boundary (ca. 260 Ma); however, its onset time has not been ascertained previously. Through a further analysis of the Wordian (middle Guadalupian) to lower Capitanian interval in the same limestone at 13 Kamura in Kyushu, we have found that the ␦ Ccarb values started to rise over +4.5‰ and reached the maximum of +7.0‰ within the Yabeina (fusuline) Zone of the early-middle Capitanian. Thus the total duration of the Kamura event is estimated over 3–4 million years, given the whole Capitanian ranging for 5.4 million years. This 3–4 million years long unique cooling event occurred clearly after the Gondwana glaciation period (late Carboniferous to early Permian) in the middle of the long-term warming trend toward the Mesozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodonts and Foraminifers
    Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 108 (2015) 117–135 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asian Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jseaes An integrated biostratigraphy (conodonts and foraminifers) and chronostratigraphy (paleomagnetic reversals, magnetic susceptibility, elemental chemistry, carbon isotopes and geochronology) for the Permian–Upper Triassic strata of Guandao section, Nanpanjiang Basin, south China ⇑ Daniel J. Lehrmann a, , Leanne Stepchinski a, Demir Altiner b, Michael J. Orchard c, Paul Montgomery d, Paul Enos e, Brooks B. Ellwood f, Samuel A. Bowring g, Jahandar Ramezani g, Hongmei Wang h, Jiayong Wei h, Meiyi Yu i, James D. Griffiths j, Marcello Minzoni k, Ellen K. Schaal l,1, Xiaowei Li l, Katja M. Meyer l,2, Jonathan L. Payne l a Geoscience Department, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA b Department of Geological Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06531, Turkey c Natural Resources Canada-Geological Survey of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 5J3, Canada d Chevron Upstream Europe, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK e Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA g Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA h Guizhou Geological Survey, Bagongli, Guiyang 550011, Guizhou Province, China i College of Resource and Environment Engineering, Guizhou University, Caijiaguan, Guiyang 550003, Guizhou Province, China j Chemostrat Ltd., 2 Ravenscroft Court, Buttington Cross Enterprise Park, Welshpool, Powys SY21 8SL, UK k Shell International Exploration and Production, 200 N. Dairy Ashford, Houston, TX 77079, USA l Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA article info abstract Article history: The chronostratigraphy of Guandao section has served as the foundation for numerous studies of the Received 13 October 2014 end-Permian extinction and biotic recovery in south China.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Boundary in Western Cuba (Sierra De Los Órganos)
    GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, JUNE 2013, 64, 3, 195—208 doi: 10.2478/geoca-2013-0014 Calpionellid distribution and microfacies across the Jurassic/ Cretaceous boundary in western Cuba (Sierra de los Órganos) RAFAEL LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ1, , RICARDO BARRAGÁN1, DANIELA REHÁKOVÁ2 and JORGE LUIS COBIELLA-REGUERA3 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México D.F., México; [email protected] 2Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geology and Paleontology, Mlynská dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; [email protected] 3Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Pinar del Río, Martí # 270, Pinar del Río, C.P. 20100, Cuba (Manuscript received May 21, 2012; accepted in revised form December 11, 2012) Abstract: A detailed bed-by-bed sampled stratigraphic section of the Guasasa Formation in the Rancho San Vicente area of the “Sierra de los Órganos”, western Cuba, provides well-supported evidence about facies and calpionellid distribution across the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary. These new data allowed the definition of an updated and sound calpionellid biozonation scheme for the section. In this scheme, the drowning event of a carbonate platform displayed by the facies of the San Vicente Member, the lowermost unit of the section, is dated as Late Tithonian, Boneti Subzone. The Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary was recognized within the facies of the overlying El Americano Member on the basis of the acme of Calpionella alpina Lorenz. The boundary is placed nearly six meters above the contact between the San Vicente and the El Americano Members, in a facies linked to a sea-level drop. The recorded calpionellid bioevents should allow correlations of the Cuban biozonation scheme herein proposed, with other previously published schemes from distant areas of the Tethyan Domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy International
    Number 30 June 1997 A NEWSLETTER OF THE SUBCOMMISSION ON PERMIAN STRATIGRAPHY SUBCOMMISSION ON PERMIAN STRATIGRAPHY INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHY INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES (IUGS) Table of Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary...................................................................................................................-1- Claude Spinosa Note from the SPS Chairman....................................................................................................................-2- Bruce R. Wardlaw Proposed new chronostratigraphic units for the Upper Permian ..............................................................-3- Amos Salvador Comments on Subdivisions of the Permian and a Standard World Scale ................................................-4- Neil W. Archbold and J. Mac Dickins Permian chronostratigraphic subdivisions ................................................................................................-5- Jin Yugan, Bruce R. Wardlaw, Brian F. Glenister and Galina V. Kotlyar The Permian Time-scale ...........................................................................................................................-6- J. B. Waterhouse Sequence Stratigraphy along Aidaralash Creek and the Carboniferous/Permian GSSP ..........................-8- Walter S. Snyder and Dora M. Gallegos Upper Paleozoic Fusulinacean Biostratigraphy of the Southern Urals ...................................................-11- Vladimir I. Davydov, Walter S. Snyder and Claude Spinosa Cordaitalean
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Effort Towards an Improved Geological Time Scale
    A community effort towards an improved geological time scale 1 This manuscript is a preprint of a paper that was submitted for publication in Journal 2 of the Geological Society. Please note that the manuscript is now formally accepted 3 for publication in JGS and has the doi number: 4 5 https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2020-222 6 7 The final version of this manuscript will be available via the ‘Peer reviewed Publication 8 DOI’ link on the right-hand side of this webpage. Please feel free to contact any of the 9 authors. We welcome feedback on this community effort to produce a framework for 10 future rock record-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian geological timescale. 11 1 A community effort towards an improved geological time scale 12 Towards a new geological time scale: A template for improved rock-based subdivision of 13 pre-Cryogenian time 14 15 Graham A. Shields1*, Robin A. Strachan2, Susannah M. Porter3, Galen P. Halverson4, Francis A. 16 Macdonald3, Kenneth A. Plumb5, Carlos J. de Alvarenga6, Dhiraj M. Banerjee7, Andrey Bekker8, 17 Wouter Bleeker9, Alexander Brasier10, Partha P. Chakraborty7, Alan S. Collins11, Kent Condie12, 18 Kaushik Das13, Evans, D.A.D.14, Richard Ernst15, Anthony E. Fallick16, Hartwig Frimmel17, Reinhardt 19 Fuck6, Paul F. Hoffman18, Balz S. Kamber19, Anton Kuznetsov20, Ross Mitchell21, Daniel G. Poiré22, 20 Simon W. Poulton23, Robert Riding24, Mukund Sharma25, Craig Storey2, Eva Stueeken26, Rosalie 21 Tostevin27, Elizabeth Turner28, Shuhai Xiao29, Shuanhong Zhang30, Ying Zhou1, Maoyan Zhu31 22 23 1Department
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Implications of a New Lower Cretaceous Ammonoid Fauna from the Puez Area (Valanginian – Aptian, Dolomites, Southern Alps, Italy)
    Geo.Alp, Vol. 3, S. 55–83, 2006 STRATIGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS OF A NEW LOWER CRETACEOUS AMMONOID FAUNA FROM THE PUEZ AREA (VALANGINIAN – APTIAN, DOLOMITES, SOUTHERN ALPS, ITALY) Alexander Lukeneder1 & Christian Aspmair2 With 6 figures and 8 plates 1 Natural History Museum, Geological-Palaeontological Department, Burgring 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Prissian 102, I – 39010 Tisens (BZ), Italy Abstract Lower Cretaceous ammonoids (n = 424) were collected at the Puez locality in the Dolomites of Southern Tyrol. The cephalopod fauna from the marly limestones to marls here indicates Late Valanginian to Early Aptian age. The deposition of the marly limestones and marls of this interval occurred during depositional- ly unstable conditions. The underlying Biancone Formation (Maiolica Formation) is of Early Valanginian, whereas the lowermost Rosso Ammonitico is of Jurassic to Berriasian age. The ammonoid fauna consists of 27 different genera, each represented by 1-2 species. The assemblage at the Puez section is dominated by the Phylloceratina (30%) and the Ammonitina (34%). Phyllopachyceras (17%) and Phylloceras (13%) (both Phylloceratina) are the most frequent components, followed by Lytoceras (12%) (Lytoceratina), and Barremites (10%) and Melchiorites (8%) (both Ammonitina). The cephalopod fauna is purely of Mediterranean origin. Zusammenfassung Unterkreide Ammonoideen (424 Exemplare) der Puez Lokalität in den Dolomiten Süd-Tirols wurden unter- sucht. Die Fauna der mergeligen Kalke und Mergel von Puez zeigen ein Alter von Ober-Valanginium bis Unter-Aptium an. Die mergeligen Kalke und Mergel dieses Abschnitts lagerten sich unter instabiler Bedingungen ab. Die unterlagernde Biancone Formation (Maiolica Formation) zeigt Unter-Valanginium an, wogegen die tiefste Formation des Rosso Ammonitico auf Ober-Jura bis Berriasium hindeutet.
    [Show full text]
  • Abelisaurus Comahuensis 321 Acanthodiscus Sp. 60, 64
    Index Page numbers in italic denote figure. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Abelisaurus comahuensis 321 structure 45-50 Acanthodiscus sp. 60, 64 Andean Fold and Thrust Belt 37-53 Acantholissonia gerthi 61 tectonic evolution 50-53 aeolian facies tectonic framework 39 Huitrin Formation 145, 151-152, 157 Andes, Neuqu6n 2, 3, 5, 6 Troncoso Member 163-164, 167, 168 morphostructural units 38 aeolian systems, flooded 168, 169, 170, 172, stratigraphy 40 174-182 tectonic evolution, 15-32, 37-39, 51 Aeolosaurus 318 interaction with Neuqu6n Basin 29-30 Aetostreon 200, 305 Andes, topography 37 Afropollis 76 Andesaurus delgadoi 318, 320 Agrio Fold and Thrust Belt 3, 16, 18, 29, 30 andesite 21, 23, 26, 42, 44 development 41 anoxia see dysoxia-anoxia stratigraphy 39-40, 40, 42 Aphrodina 199 structure 39, 42-44, 47 Aphrodina quintucoensis 302 uplift Late Cretaceous 43-44 Aptea notialis 75 Agrio Formation Araucariacites australis 74, 75, 76 ammonite biostratigraphy 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, Araucarioxylon 95,273-276 67 arc morphostructural units 38 bedding cycles 232, 234-247 Arenicolites 193, 196 calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy 68, 71, Argentiniceras noduliferum 62 72 biozone 58, 61 highstand systems tract 154 Asteriacites 90, 91,270 lithofacies 295,296, 297, 298-302 Asterosoma 86 92 marine facies 142-143, 144, 153 Auca Mahuida volcano 25, 30 organic facies 251-263 Aucasaurus garridoi 321 palaeoecology 310, 311,312 Auquilco evaporites 42 palaeoenvironment 309- 310, 311, Avil6 Member 141,253, 298 312-313 ammonites 66 palynomorph biostratigraphy 74,
    [Show full text]
  • Available Generic Names for Trilobites
    AVAILABLE GENERIC NAMES FOR TRILOBITES P.A. JELL AND J.M. ADRAIN Jell, P.A. & Adrain, J.M. 30 8 2002: Available generic names for trilobites. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 48(2): 331-553. Brisbane. ISSN0079-8835. Aconsolidated list of available generic names introduced since the beginning of the binomial nomenclature system for trilobites is presented for the first time. Each entry is accompanied by the author and date of availability, by the name of the type species, by a lithostratigraphic or biostratigraphic and geographic reference for the type species, by a family assignment and by an age indication of the type species at the Period level (e.g. MCAM, LDEV). A second listing of these names is taxonomically arranged in families with the families listed alphabetically, higher level classification being outside the scope of this work. We also provide a list of names that have apparently been applied to trilobites but which remain nomina nuda within the ICZN definition. Peter A. Jell, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia; Jonathan M. Adrain, Department of Geoscience, 121 Trowbridge Hall, Univ- ersity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA; 1 August 2002. p Trilobites, generic names, checklist. Trilobite fossils attracted the attention of could find. This list was copied on an early spirit humans in different parts of the world from the stencil machine to some 20 or more trilobite very beginning, probably even prehistoric times. workers around the world, principally those who In the 1700s various European natural historians would author the 1959 Treatise edition. Weller began systematic study of living and fossil also drew on this compilation for his Presidential organisms including trilobites.
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupian, Middle Permian) Mass Extinction in NW Pangea (Borup Fiord, Arctic Canada): a Global Crisis Driven by Volcanism and Anoxia
    The Capitanian (Guadalupian, Middle Permian) mass extinction in NW Pangea (Borup Fiord, Arctic Canada): A global crisis driven by volcanism and anoxia David P.G. Bond1†, Paul B. Wignall2, and Stephen E. Grasby3,4 1Department of Geography, Geology and Environment, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 3Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 33rd Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2L 2A7, Canada 4Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada ABSTRACT ing gun of eruptions in the distant Emeishan 2009; Wignall et al., 2009a, 2009b; Bond et al., large igneous province, which drove high- 2010a, 2010b), making this a mid-Capitanian Until recently, the biotic crisis that oc- latitude anoxia via global warming. Although crisis of short duration, fulfilling the second cri- curred within the Capitanian Stage (Middle the global Capitanian extinction might have terion. Several other marine groups were badly Permian, ca. 262 Ma) was known only from had different regional mechanisms, like the affected in equatorial eastern Tethys Ocean, in- equatorial (Tethyan) latitudes, and its global more famous extinction at the end of the cluding corals, bryozoans, and giant alatocon- extent was poorly resolved. The discovery of Permian, each had its roots in large igneous chid bivalves (e.g., Wang and Sugiyama, 2000; a Boreal Capitanian crisis in Spitsbergen, province volcanism. Weidlich, 2002; Bond et al., 2010a; Chen et al., with losses of similar magnitude to those in 2018). In contrast, pelagic elements of the fauna low latitudes, indicated that the event was INTRODUCTION (ammonoids and conodonts) suffered a later, geographically widespread, but further non- ecologically distinct, extinction crisis in the ear- Tethyan records are needed to confirm this as The Capitanian (Guadalupian Series, Middle liest Lopingian (Huang et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Non-Mineralized Cephalopod Jaws and Arm Hooks
    Klug et al. Swiss J Palaeontol (2020) 139:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-020-00210-y Swiss Journal of Palaeontology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access First record of non-mineralized cephalopod jaws and arm hooks from the latest Cretaceous of Eurytania, Greece Christian Klug1* , Donald Davesne2,3, Dirk Fuchs4 and Thodoris Argyriou5 Abstract Due to the lower fossilization potential of chitin, non-mineralized cephalopod jaws and arm hooks are much more rarely preserved as fossils than the calcitic lower jaws of ammonites or the calcitized jaw apparatuses of nautilids. Here, we report such non-mineralized fossil jaws and arm hooks from pelagic marly limestones of continental Greece. Two of the specimens lie on the same slab and are assigned to the Ammonitina; they represent upper jaws of the aptychus type, which is corroborated by fnds of aptychi. Additionally, one intermediate type and one anaptychus type are documented here. The morphology of all ammonite jaws suggest a desmoceratoid afnity. The other jaws are identifed as coleoid jaws. They share the overall U-shape and proportions of the outer and inner lamellae with Jurassic lower jaws of Trachyteuthis (Teudopseina). We also document the frst belemnoid arm hooks from the Tethyan Maastrichtian. The fossils described here document the presence of a typical Mesozoic cephalopod assemblage until the end of the Cretaceous in the eastern Tethys. Keywords: Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea, Desmoceratoidea, Coleoidea, Maastrichtian, Taphonomy Introduction as jaws, arm hooks, and radulae are occasionally found Fossil cephalopods are mainly known from preserved (Matern 1931; Mapes 1987; Fuchs 2006a; Landman et al. mineralized parts such as aragonitic phragmocones 2010; Kruta et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook for the Post-Congress Fieldtrip in the Vocontian Basin, SE France (September 11-13, 2008)
    12th Meeting of the International Nannoplankton Association (Lyon, September 7-10, 2008) Guidebook for the post-congress fieldtrip in the Vocontian Basin, SE France (September 11-13, 2008) Emanuela MATTIOLI (special editor), Silvia GARDIN, Fabienne GIRAUD, Davide OLIVERO, Bernard PITTET & Stéphane REBOULET ISBN 978-2-916733-02-9 Dépôt légal à parution Manuscrit en ligne depuis le 7 Septembre 2008 Manuscript online since September 7, 2008 Carnets de Géologie / Notebooks on Geology - Book 2008/01 (CG2008_BOOK_01) Guidebook for the post-congress fieldtrip in the Vocontian Basin, SE France (September 11-13, 2008) Emanuela MATTIOLI (special editor) 1,2, Silvia GARDIN 3, Fabienne GIRAUD 1, Davide OLIVERO 1, Bernard PITTET 1 & Stéphane REBOULET 1 1 UMR 5125 PEPS (CNRS), Université Lyon 1, Campus de la DOUA, Bâtiment Géode, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex (France) 2 [email protected] 3 UMR 5143 (CNRS), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, 75013 Paris (France) Manuscript online since September 7, 2008 1 Carnets de Géologie / Notebooks on Geology - Book 2008/01 (CG2008_BOOK_01) Chapter 1. The Aalenian-Bajocian northward, with many hiatuses (JAUTÉE, 1984). (Middle Jurassic) of the Digne Basinal facies, represented by marl-limestone alternations, are recorded in the southernmost area areas but in the sector south of the Verdon Davide OLIVERO with the contribution of River a shallow-water platform developed, Emanuela MATTIOLI documented by the occurrence of bioclastic limestones with corals. This development is Geographical and geological context evidence of a progressive extension to the Provence platform southward. The Digne area is located in southeastern France (Fig. 1.1), in the department of "Alpes In the Middle Jurassic, the central part of the de Haute-Provence".
    [Show full text]