DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of Education Topical Guide：Kai Tak Airport (1946-1998) Kai Tak Airport (1946-1998) Related Government Departments & Institutions Airport Facilities Air Transport and Daily Life Possible Keywords Possible Keywords Possible Keywords Kai Tak, Airport/Airfield/Aerodrome, Hong Kong Airport runway, Flight path, Kai Tak Air Terminal Aviation, Airplane/Aeroplane, Air accident, International Airport, Civil Aviation Department, Buildings, Tarmac, Passenger terminal Tourism, Kowloon Bay Public Works Department, Royal Air Force, Aero Club of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Airways, Air Hong Kong, Cathay Pacific Archival holding (examples) HKRS365-1-447-6: Hong Kong Government Printer: Papers on HKRS41-1-8702: Kai Tak Development International Airport - One of Asia's Development of Kai Tak Airport, 1954 Scheme - Progress Reports on..., Busiest by Peter Ilffe-moon in Hong Kong. (387.736 PAP) 1955-1961 1973 (Review) Peter Pigott: Kai Tak: A History of Aviation HKRS70-1-1: Airport, Kai Tak, 1954-1969 HKRS41-1-9453: Hong Kong Airport - in Hong Kong, 1990 (387.736 PIG) HKRS41-1-7766: Kai Tak Airport Ceremony for Opening of New Terminal, Chinese Language Division: An Development - Expenditure on Stages C. 1958-1962 English-Chinese Glossary of Terms and D., 1952-1955 HKRS163-1-1577: Aircraft Accident - Commonly Used in Government HKRS41-1-956: Hong Kong Airport, Kai Crash of a R.A.F. Hastings Aircraft at Departments : Volume 5, Transport (Part II Tak - Reports on Radio Facilities and Air Royal Air Force, Kai Tak, 1953-1954 - Air Transport)/ 中文公事管理局：《政 Traffic Control, 1946-1954 HKMS189-1-112: Discussions about 府機關常用英漢辭彙：第五輯 ,交通 HKRS41-1-9459: Kai Tak Airport - Extension to Kai Tak Airport, 1969 (第二部 ,空運)》, 1987 (387.7 ENG 1987) Miscellaneous Correspondence Regarding HKMS189-1-176: Development of Kai Tak Civil Aviation Department: Civil Aircraft the Terminal Buildings and Base Lay-out Airport at Hong Kong, 1970 Accident: Report On The Accident To of..., 1958-1959 HKMS189-1-225: Development of Kai Tak Caravelle III HS-TGI Near Hong Kong HKRS156-1-1869: Royal Air Force Station Airport at Hong Kong, 1971-1972 International Airport On 30th June, 1967, at Kai Tak - Application from the Royal Air HKRS365-1-447-3: Hong Kong 1968 (363.12465 CAR) Force Authorities for sites for the Erection International Airport - [The Air Traffic Reference file (examples) of Aerial Masts at the - ,1949-1961 Control Centre] PRO-REF-177: Aviation – Hong Kong HKRS156-1-2551-1: Extension to the Main HKRS365-1-447-1: Hong Kong Non-government publication Runway at Kai Tak - 1. Construction of the International Airport - [The Passport (examples) - By R.A.F. 2. Resumption of Certain Lots Inspection Counters] John Keith Maxwell Henry: The for the - , 1950-1951 Government publication Construction of the New Hong Kong HKRS41-1-954: Aerial Flights - Application (examples) Airport, 1961 (387.736 CON 1961) for Permission for an American Military Government Information Services: Hong Hong Kong Royal Air Force: Gau Lung: Observers Plane C-47, No.43-16362, to Kong Airport, 1962 (387.736 GOV) Souvenir of RAF Kai Tak Edition, 1977 Land at Kai Tak Airport, 1946 Public Works Department: Project Report (358.4 ROY) on the Development of Kai Tak Airport Gordon L. D. Alderson: History of Royal Air 1953, 1953 (387.7362 PRO) Force Kai Tak, 1972 (355.0942 ALD) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. the Meeting Was Resumed at 9:10 A.M. on 22.11.2017. 2. the Following Members and the Secretary Were Present at the Resumed Me
    - 1 - 1. The meeting was resumed at 9:10 a.m. on 22.11.2017. 2. The following Members and the Secretary were present at the resumed meeting : Permanent Secretary for Development Chairperson (Planning and Lands) Ms Bernadette H.H. Linn Mr H.W. Cheung Dr Wilton W.T. Fok Mr Ivan C.S. Fu Mr Dominic K.K. Lam Dr F.C. Chan Mr K.K. Cheung Mr Wilson Y.W. Fung Dr C.H. Hau Dr Lawrence K.C. Li Professor T.S. Liu Ms Sandy H.Y. Wong Mr Franklin Yu Deputy Director (1), Environmental Protection Department Mr Elvis W.K. Au Assistant Director (Regional 1), Lands Department Mr Simon S.W. Wang Chief Traffic Engineer (Kowloon), Transport Department Mr Simon H.W. Lau - 2 - Kowloon District Agenda Item 1 (Continued) [Open Meeting] Consideration of Representations and Comments in respect of Draft Ngau Tau Kok & Kowloon Bay Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K13/29 (TPB Papers No. 10354 and 10355) [The meeting was conducted in Cantonese and English] Group 1 3. The Chairperson said that the meeting was the second hearing day for Group 1 of the representations and comments in respect of the Draft Ngau Tau Kok & Kowloon Bay Outline Zoning Plan. 4. The Secretary said that Members’ declarations of interests were made at the last session on 15.11.2017 (paragraph 30 of the Minutes of 15.11.2017). Members noted that Mr Raymond K.W. Lee, Mr Martin W.C. Kwan, Mr H.F. Leung, Ms Janice W.M. Lai, Mr Patrick H.T.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Cultural Heritage Impact
    MTR Corpor ation Ltd. SCL – NEX/2206 EIA Study for Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report 4 Cultural Heritage Impact 4.1 Introduction The EIA Study Brief for SCL requires a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (CHIA) comprising a Built Heritage Impact Assessment (BHIA) and an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) to be conducted. The BHIA needs to search historic buildings, clan graves and landscape features within the study area while the AIA requires a terrestrial investigation of the archaeological potential of the study area, particularly the former Tai Hom Village Archaeological Site. The field investigation for former Tai Hom Village was carried out in March 2009. Tang/ Song Dynasty remains found are sparse and redeposited and hence of lesser archaeological significance. However, assemblage of Tang/ Song archaeological finds within urban setting is considered rare in Hong Kong. Other than the former Tai Hom Village Archaeological Site, the CHIA has also studied the impacts on the 3 historical buildings within former Tai Hom Village and, after studying their cultural significance and all possible options, recommended the most appropriate mitigation measures. The possible impacts caused by the construction and operation of the Project on other built heritages including but not limited to the Lung Tsun Stone Bridge have also been studied and the impacts have been minimised by adopting alternative construction methodologies. More details of the assessment findings and mitigation measures are given in this Chapter. 4.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines The assessment and protection of cultural heritage within HKSAR is governed by the following legislative standards and guidelines: • Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO); • Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance; and • Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG).
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Banham Hong Kong University Press the University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong
    Tony Banham Hong Kong University Press The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © 2003 Hong Kong University Press First paperback edition 2005 ISBN 978-962-209-780-3 (Paperback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Printed and bound by CTPS Limited in Hong Kong, China Contents Preface ix Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 1. The Background 3 Hong Kong, 1841 to 1941 3 The Causes of the War 7 2. THE BATTLE 11 The Week Immediately Preceding the Fighting 11 The Battle 17 3. Phase I: The Loss of the Mainland 21 18 December Monday 23 19 December Tuesday 32 10 December Wednesday 40 未命名5> 5 8/27/2010, 5:32 PM vi CONTENTS 11 December Thursday 47 12 December Friday 56 4. Phase II: The Siege of the Island 65 13 December Saturday 66 14 December Sunday 73 15 December Monday 78 16 December Tuesday 83 17 December Wednesday 89 5. Phase III: The Invasion of the Island 93 18 December Thursday 95 6. Phase IV: The Forcing of Wong Nai Chung Gap 115 19 December Friday 117 7. Phase V: Pushing the Line West and Encircling Stanley 165 20 December Saturday 168 21 December Sunday 185 22 December Monday 199 23 December Tuesday 214 24 December Wednesday 230 25 December Thursday 248 26 December Friday 276 8.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the 1444 Historic Buildings with Assessment Results
    List of the 1,444 Historic Buildings with Assessment Results (as at 9 Sept 2021) Page 1 Proposed Year of Construction / Remarks Number Name and Address 名稱及地址 Ownership Grading Restoration 備註 Grade 1 confirmed on 18 Dec 2009 Tsang Tai Uk, Sha Tin, N.T. 新界沙田曾大屋 1 Private Built 1847-1867 1 二○○九年十二月十八日確定為一級歷史建築 Combined with numbers 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 as one item and accorded with The Wai was built between Kat Hing Wai, Shrine, Kam Tin, Yuen Long, Grade 1 collectively on 31 Aug 2010 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍神廳 1 Private 1465 and 1487, the wall 2 二○一○年八月三十一日確定與編號3、4、5、6和7合併為一項， N.T. was 1662-1722. 並整體評為一級歷史建築 The Wai was built between Combined with numbers 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 as one item and accorded with Kat Hing Wai, Entrance Gate, Kam Tin, 1465 and 1487, the wall Grade 1 collectively on 31 Aug 2010 3 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍圍門 1 Private Yuen Long, N.T. was 1662-1722, alias Fui 二○一○年八月三十一日確定與編號2、4、5、6和7合併為一項， Sha Wai (灰沙圍). 並整體評為一級歷史建築 The Wai was built between Combined with numbers 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 as one item and accorded with Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (northwest) and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓 1465 and 1487, the wall Grade 1 collectively on 31 Aug 2010 4 1 Private Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen Long, N.T. (西北)及圍牆 was 1662-1722, alias Fui 二○一○年八月三十一日確定與編號2、3、5、6和7合併為一項， Sha Wai (灰沙圍). 並整體評為一級歷史建築 The Wai was built between Combined with numbers 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 as one item and accorded with Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (northeast) and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓 1465 and 1487, the wall Grade 1 collectively on 31 Aug 2010 5 1 Private Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen Long, N.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Project: SCL Tai Wai to Hung Hom Project Title: Desktop Study / Field
    Project: SCL Tai Wai to Hung Hom Project Title: Desktop Study / Field Survey for Built Heritage Built Heritage: Former Royal Airforce Hangar (前英國皇家空軍飛機庫) at Former Tai Hom Village （（大磡村大磡村）(Refer to A6.1-022) Prior to the Japanese occupation (before and during 2nd World War), there were plans by the authorities to expand Kai Tak Airfield and build paved runways. Owing to this purpose, the former Royal Airforce Hangar (RAF hangar) located at the eastern end of the airfield and constructed in 1934 was dismantled in June 1941. While it is not entirely clear when the hangar at Tai Hom was erected and by whom (Japanese or British), the current hangar was re-erected on-site around 1941-45. It was designed to be taken down and reassembled quickly. During the war, the Japanese succeeded the British also planned to expand Kai Tak and built two paved crossing runways. Whether material from the dismantled RAF hangar was reused for the one at Diamond Hill is uncertain but the steel supports of the hangar do indicate that they were made in Britain. Regardless who actually constructed the hangar, it is certain that it had been used by the Japanese troop during the 2nd World War. After the 2nd World War, the RAF used the hangar which included housing the Spitfire squadron. As the hangar was situated outside the confines of RAF Kai Tak, access to it was via a narrow road that crossed the Kai Tak Airport perimeter road (ie the current Choi Hung Road). This can be seen on an aerial photo circa 1955 according to the publication “Mapping of Hong Kong ” with the hangar and the access road traversing the ring road, i.e Clearwater Bay Road , subsequently renamed Choi Hung Road.
    [Show full text]
  • 複本cultural Venues for Hiring HK 2020 Revamp 20200828.Xlsx
    District地區_chi District地區_eng Venue場地_chi Venue場地_eng Facility設施_chi Facility設施_eng Address地址_chi Address地址_eng VenueOperator場地營運者_chi VenueOperator場地營運者_eng Contact聯絡方法_chi Contact聯絡方法_eng Website網址_chi Website網址_eng FacilictyBooking租用設施資料_chi FacilictyBooking租用設施資料_eng 電話: 2907 3733 Tel: 2907 3733 展覽場地、多用途活動室、公眾休 Exhibition Area, Multi‐Function 香港 Hong Kong Island 茂蘿街7號 7 Mallory Street 香港灣仔茂蘿街7號 7 Mallory Street, Wanchai, Hong Kong 市區重建局 Urban Renewal Authority 聯絡表格: https://mallory.ura‐ Contact Form: https://mallory.ura‐ https://mallory.ura‐vb.org.hk https://mallory.ura‐vb.org.hk https://mallory.ura‐vb.org.hk/booking/ https://mallory.ura‐vb.org.hk/booking/ 憩空間 Rooms, Public Open Space vb.org.hk/contact_us/ vb.org.hk/contact_us/ 1/F Cambridge House, Taikoo Place, 電郵: E‐mail: https://www.taikooplace.com/en/artistree/venue https://www.taikooplace.com/en/artistree/venue 香港 Hong Kong Island ArtisTree ArtisTree ArtisTree多用途空間 ArtisTree Multi‐purpose Space 香港太古坊康橋大廈1樓 太古地產有限公司 Swire Properties Management Ltd https://www.taikooplace.com/en/artistree https://www.taikooplace.com/en/artistree Island East, Hong Kong [email protected] [email protected] hire hire Tel: 2881 8888 電話: 2881 8888 Submission of proposals to the Exhibition Site at MTR Central 請把計劃書遞交到九龍九龍灣偉業街 Corporate Relations Department, MTR http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/customer/community http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/customer/community http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/customer/community http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/customer/community 香港 Hong Kong Island 藝術管道 Arttube 中環站展覽場地
    [Show full text]
  • AAB Building Assessment Annex E20090624
    List of the Historic Buildings in Building Assessment (as of 18 March 2009) Page 1 Year of Existing Proposed Grading Number Name and Address 名稱及地址 Ownership Construction / Grading Grading Year Restoration 1 Tsang Tai Uk, Sha Tin, N.T. 新界沙田曾大屋 II1997 Private Built 1847–1867 The Wai was built Kat Hing Wai, Shrine, Kam Tin, Yuen no between 1465 and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍神廳 I --- Private 2 Long, N.T. grade 1487, the wall was 1662-1722 The Wai was built between 1465 and Kat Hing Wai, Entrance Gate, Kam Tin, no 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍圍門 I --- Private 1487, the wall was 3 grade Yuen Long, N.T. 1662-1722, alias Fui Sha Wai (灰沙圍) The Wai was built --- Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (northwest) between 1465 and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓(西 no (Watch- and Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen 1487, the wall was 4 grade I tower Private 北)及圍牆 1662-1722, alias Fui Long, N.T. #1986) Sha Wai (灰沙圍) The Wai was built --- Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (northeast) between 1465 and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓(東 no (Watch- and Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen 1487, the wall was 5 grade I tower Private 北)及圍牆 1662-1722, alias Fui Long, N.T. #1986) Sha Wai (灰沙圍) The Wai was built --- Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (southeast) between 1465 and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓(東 no (Watch- and Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen 1487, the wall was 6 grade I tower Private 南)及圍牆 1662-1722, alias Fui Long, N.T. #1986) Sha Wai (灰沙圍) The Wai was built --- Kat Hing Wai, Watchtower (southwest) between 1465 and 新界元朗錦田吉慶圍炮樓(西 no (Watch- and Enclosing Walls, Kam Tin, Yuen 1487, the wall was 7 grade I tower Private 南)及圍牆 1662-1722, alias Fui Long, N.T.
    [Show full text]
  • LC Paper No. CB(1)778/16-17(02)
    LC Paper No. CB(1)778/16-17(02) Subcommittee on Antiquities and Monuments (Declaration of Proposed Monument)(Hung Lau) Notice Members’ request for information made at the meeting of 31 March 2017 (1) Relevant documents relating to the assessment of Hung Lau and classification of the building as a Grade 1 historic building by the Antiquities Advisory Board (“AAB”) in 1981, and AAB’s subsequent reviews on the grading The heritage value of Hung Lau was considered by the Antiquities Advisory Board (“AAB”) in 1981, 1985, 1995, 2009 and 2011. Since September 2005, AAB has opened up its regular meetings and make available the discussion papers and minutes of the open meetings on its website. As the discussion papers and the minutes of AAB meetings prior to the opening up of meeting (i.e. September 2005) are restricted internal documents, a summary of the relevant meetings is provided below. 2. The grading system for historic buildings has been adopted by AAB since 1980: Grade 1 buildings are those of outstanding merit; Grade 2 buildings are those of special merit; and Grade 3 buildings are those of some merit. Hung Lau was then included in the list of buildings of Chinese style, and was tentatively given a Grade 2 status. 3. At the 22nd AAB meeting of 13 January 1981, it was pointed out that architecturally, Hung Lau was in Western style, and that it should be accorded a Grade 1 status. At the 23rd AAB meeting of 31 March 1981, the AAB considered whether to recommend the Antiquities Authority to declare Hung Lau as monument under section 3(1) of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroes of the Raf Fire Service
    ROYAL AIR FORCE & DEFENCE FIRE SERVICES ASSOCIATION MAGAZINE tie ssociAtioN New A vAilAble A Age hop p see s INSIDE THIS 24 PAGE ISSUE EmErGENcy Standby! - HEroES of THE rAf fIrE SErvIcE - vETErAN’S bADGE - ArE yoU ENTITLED To oNE ? rAf CatterIck EvENT JUNE 2006 - SToP PrESS - ASSocIATIoN SHoP - robIN HooD AIrPorT rEPorT rAf mArHAm vISIT 23RD NovEmbEr 2005 - SPoTLIGHT oN rAf CatterIck fIrE SqUADroN PArT 1 mUSEUm Update - voLUNTEErS wANTED for workING parTIES - for catterIck - Riat AND mUSEUm vIcE- cHAIrmAN vAcANcy - ProPoSED NEw rAf AND DEfENcE fIrE & rEScUE SErvIcE book ! Aprilwww.fireservicesassociation.net 2006 wwww.fireservicesassociation.net 1 Flashpoint Magazine - April 2006 brief History of The Association Formation of the Association CONTENTS The formation of the Royal Air Force & Defence Fire Area Coordinators were subsequently elected to cover 2 Brief History of the Services Association took place at Shoreham Airport in East the U.K. Association Sussex, on the13th. May 1995, when 23 ex-service personnel The Intervening Years got together to settle the question of why there wasn’t an 3 Who to Contact Many changes have taken place since then as the - Proposed New organisation relating to the trade of firefighter when most Association established itself over the intervening years Book recording other trades had formed one of their own many years ago? and, with its formation, colleagues, past and present, now the history and the development of the Inaugural Committee Formed have a better chance of finding each other again, renewing RAFand Defence old friendships and making new ones. On that day, when those founder members turned up from Fire and Rescue all over the country, they went on to form the inaugural The Association publishes Flashpoint magazine 3 times Service committee of the Association and elected the following per year with information, news, updates, articles, 4 Editorial - Useful Officers and Committee:- anecdotes, photos.
    [Show full text]
  • BASELINE CONDITIONS 1 General 2 Former Royal Air Force Hangar
    Appendix 4.4A BASELINE CONDITIONS 1 General There are three historical buildings within the DIH site. All three historical buildings are currently (at the time of writing this report) graded historical buildings. Their grading has however been reviewed recently in a comprehensive assessment of historical buildings by AMO on 31 August 2010 and proposed as follows: AMO Grading Built Heritage within Tai Hom Site Existing Proposed [1] (1) Former Royal Air Force Hangar Grade 3 Grade 3** (2) Stone House No 4 at Tai Koon Yuen Grade 3 No grading** (3) Old Pillbox Grade 2 Grade 2** [2 ] [1] As per AMO’s List of the Historic Buildings in Building Assessment (as of 21 December 2010) [2] Grade 2 confirmed on 31 August 2010 ** Proposed grading has been confirmed for the Historic Building as per AMO’s list (as of 21 December 2010) Note: The definitions of graded buildings in Hong Kong are as follows: Grade 1 Buildings of outstanding merit, which every effort should be made to preserve if possible. Grade 2 Buildings of special merit; efforts should be made to selectively preserve. Grade 3 Buildings of some merit; preservation in some form would be desirable and alternative means could be considered if preservation is not practicable. Although graded buildings and structures carry no statutory protection, the Government has administrative procedures that require conservation be given to those historic buildings and sites of cultural heritage. The principles in preserving built heritage are summarised below: • Where practicable, in-situ preservation shall be considered as the first priority; • Total destruction shall be the last resort and only recommended following meticulous and careful analysis balancing the interest of preserving cultural heritage as against that of the community as a whole.
    [Show full text]