The Corporation of the Township of Tay Committee of all Council Meeting

March 13, 2019 10:00 a.m.

Municipal Office Council Chambers Agenda

1. Call to Order:

2. Adoption of the Agenda:

3. Disclosure of Interest:

4. Delegations

10:00 – C. Lambie, CEO & President – Re: Update on Waypoint and Waypoint/CHIGAMIK Health Hub

10:15 – M. Lavigne – Re: Canine By-law & Fencing Requirements

10:30 – E. Conroy, Friends of Keewatin – Re: SS Keewatin Update & Future Plans

5. Standing Committee Business:

A: Protection to Persons & Property

B: General Government & Finance

C: Public Works

D: Planning & Development

6. Closed Session:

6.1 Verbal Report – Clerk – Re: A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board (Potential Land Acquisition)

6.2 Verbal Report – Fire Chief – Re: Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board (By-law Enforcement Matter).

7. Adjournment:

Note: Delegations will commence at the schedule time; however, commencement time for each Committee will be adjusted as the meeting takes place.

1 5 in 5 people have mental health

1 in 5 Canadians personally It is estimated that 10-20% of Canadian experience a mental health youth are affected by a mental illness or problem or illness disorder – the single most disabling group of disorders worldwide

Approximately 8% of adults will An estimated 500,000 people experience major depression at are not at work in any given some time in their lives week due to mental illness 2 Correcting the Myths about Mental Illness

3 Mental health myths

Mental illnesses are not real illnesses - MYTH Mental illnesses are just an excuse for poor behaviour - MYTH People with mental illnesses are violent and dangerous - MYTH People do not recover from mental illnesses - MYTH People who experience mental illnesses cannot work - MYTH Mental illnesses will never affect me - MYTH

(Canadian Mental Health Association)

4 Waypoint History

2014 Grand Opening of new Atrium Building in February, operations begin in two phases with patients relocating in April and May

5 Waypoint Today

• Public Hospital since Dec. 2008 • Catholic Health Sponsors of Ontario member hospital Admissions (2017/18 data) • 1,200 employees, 119 volunteers Regional programs: 973 • Approximately $147 million annual Provincial programs: 147 budget • Accreditation Canada Exemplary Status Total Admissions: 1120 • Member Simcoe County Hospital Alliance Discharges • Officially launched Waypoint Research Regional programs: 954 Institute in June 2013 Provincial programs: 151 • University of Toronto affiliated hospital Total Discharges: 1105 • 301 inpatient beds Average Occupancy: 91%

6 Regional 141-bed hospital services

Specialized mental health and addiction services for residents of Simcoe County, Muskoka, south Parry Sound Districts and parts of Dufferin County

Inpatient clinical programs • Acute Assessment Program (20 beds) • Bayview Program for Dual Diagnosis (16 beds) • Georgianwood Program for Concurrent Disorders (15 beds) • Horizon Program for Geriatric Psychiatry (28 beds) • Sans Souci Program for Transition and Recovery (42 beds) • Brebeuf Program for Regional Forensics (20 beds)

7 Provincial Forensic Mental Health Programs

The province’s only high secure forensic mental health programs providing assessment, treatment and care for adult male patients with mental illness who have come into contact with the law

Inpatient Programs (160 beds) • Forensic Assessment Program • Three care units providing mental health and addiction treatment and rehabilitation • Beckwith Program • Beausoleil Program • Awenda Program • Full range of rehabilitation and vocational programs • New modern Atrium Building opened for patients in May, 2014

8 Outpatient Mental Health Programs and the HERO Centre

 Approx. 1000 registered outpatients  25,000 visits/contacts with staff

Outpatient Mental Health programs • Outpatient Assessment and Treatment Services • Mobile Treatment and Support Team • Community Consultative Services • Transitional Age Youth Psychiatric Consultation

HERO Centre: • H - Housing • E - Employment • R - Rehabilitation Services • O - Our Place Social Club

9 Waypoint/CHIGAMIK Community Health Hub

A collaborative approach to delivering a range of health care services that enhance people’s physical and mental health through a centrally located new health hub in the downtown Midland area.

• co-locates CHIGAMIK Community Health Centre and Waypoint’s outpatient and community programs in Midland • downtown Midland proximity increases accessibility, especially for those who walk or take the bus and provides access to other services, area restaurants, shops and businesses • opportunity to share resources • partnership includes the Town of Midland, providing a long term opportunity for residents to receive local health care • includes new Youth Wellness Hub

10 Youth Wellness Hub

• Fully integrated “one-stop-shops” for youth aged 12-25 • Service planning included their voice and is intended to address their needs related to mental health, substance use, primary care, education/employment/training, housing and other community and social services • Also includes peer services, outreach, and system navigation services • Services emphasize quality and are timely, integrated and co- located • North Simcoe Youth Wellness Hub is one of 10 being piloted across the province Planned Opening for 2019

12 Research and Academics

• Officially launched Waypoint Research Institute June 21, 2013 • University of Toronto affiliated hospital • Expanding partnerships and affiliations with Lakehead University, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, UOIT 2017 Highlights 15 Research peer reviewed publications 55 Invited peer reviews conducted 3 New academic appointments 7 Events and Colloquium Series sessions 1,043 Individuals from across the world trained in ODARA 101 between 2013 and 2015

13 Waypoint Research Institute

• Scientific Team (x15) • Psychology and Psychiatry • Post-doctoral fellows & graduate students • Current research & collaborations: • Neuro-cognitive factors & aggression (fMRI) • Genetics of mental illness • Trauma among mental health care providers • Therapeutic engagement and climate • Cultural competence • Metabolic syndrome • Circadian cycle and aggression • Digital therapy • Treatment outcome & evidence-based practice

14 Waypoint - The Future

Master Plan – 0 to 5 Years • Re-programming and minor renovations to improve Regional programs: – Move Geriatric program into the Toanche Building and relocate Georgianwood Program to the stand alone Bayfield building – Create consolidated regional program therapy mall and multi- purpose leisure, lifestyle and activation areas in Toanche 30 Year Vision • Relocate regional inpatient programs to new fully accessible building with individual patient rooms (currently up to 6 patients per room) • Add transitional housing to campus • Build academic buildings to further research and partnerships 15 Upcoming Events

February 23, 2019

March 30, 2019 Delegation Meeting March 13th

I am requesting a meeting with council regarding By‐Law 5.3 I have been informed by canine by law that in 2017 council passed this by law. I was only notified of this by law in January of 2018. We purchased this property in 2012 and placed outside kennels behind our house. Neither one of our neighbors are adjacent to the kennels and they are fully enclosed with chain link fencing. The kennels are surrounded completely by trees as indicated in the pictures provided. In the spring summer and fall when the fullage is present you cannot see the kennel area from either side and the trees serve as a sound barrier. Therefore in order for us to put up the fencing required we would have to have someone come in and take down a number of trees in order to even put it up. We are not a boarding kennel we are a breeding kennel, and in the last 5 years have only had one litter a year which hardly covers the cost of feeding and veterinary cost .My husband and I recently made the decision to retire and therefore will be downsizing the kennel. If we were just starting our kennel we would take out a loan to pay for this but since we are retiring it is just not in our budget to have someone come in and take down the trees in order to put up this kind of fencing and since the by law is very vague we live on 10 acres , does that mean because we have neighbors we have to put fencing up all of the 10 acres. We also feel that we should fall under the grandfather clause as we purchased this property 5 years prior to this by law. We have put up tarps along our exercise run for privacy as well.

March 13 2019

Thank you for the opportunity to come before you.

The "Friends of Keewatin" would first like to take a few minutes to give you an update on the attraction Keewatin that first arrived here on May 1 1912 She didn’t leave Port McNicoll until after 55 years working from the CPR Docks on Talbot Street. After Canadian Pacific Railway decommissioned The ship and closed the facility down, an American marina owner purchased the KEEWATIN to be an attraction in Douglas Michigan. ’

Keewatin left Port McNicoll on Saturday, June 23, 1967 at 2:30 in the afternoon

Keewatin was a successful museum in America for exactly 45 years. In 2011 Keewatin was obtained by Skyline Investments who had also purchased the CPR lands in Port McNicoll. The ship was returned on to her former home in Tay Township

Keewatin returned to Port McNicoll on Saturday, June 23, 2012 at 2:30 in the afternoon

Keewatin’s arrival was heralded by thousands of spectators and was acquired with the intention of becoming a great Iconic symbol of Port McNicoll. It would put Port McNicoll on the map and be an attraction that would bring in many tourists to Tay Township. KEEWATIN is Scottish built, five years before than Titanic . The KEE is the last of 3800 ships built in Great Britain between 1900 and 1920. Her 112 years of history covers from the height of the Industrial Revolution until man was circling the moon. She helped populate Canada; developed Tourism from the 20’s through to the 60’s, transported millions of bushels of flour south and tons of cargo west. The CP operation also employed hundreds of local people for several generations. KEEWATIN is currently owned by SKYLINE INVESTMENTS but operated by the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation, which uses the name "Friends of Keewatin"

Keewatin’s return was a fairytale story that inspired a nation, spawned a CBC documentary and a Murdoch Mysteries TV show. But fairytale it was not, and although still heading for universal popularity there has been many twists and turns.

As you are all aware Skyline Investments has sold the CP Railway lands to CMI International. KEEWATIN was not part of the purchase. As a result of misinformation, at first CIM were not interested in KEEWATIN and negotiated with your staff to trade the designated park (that was contracted to be donated to Tay Township as part of the Dock Lane Development) for another piece of waterfront property on the lands. However, CIM International now realizes the tremendous advantage KEEWATIN holds in attracting home buyers once their project starts. They also have become aware of the historic significance of KEEWATIN to Port and Tay Township. Friends of Keewatin have been fortunate enough to negotiate a lease for the water on which KEEWATIN floats in the harbour as CIM own the Riparian rights. CIM senior management are here with us today.

CIM tell us that it is their intention to resume the concept of providing the park at 311 Talbot Street to Tay Township so it can host KEEWATIN. As you know $1.6 million dollars were invested in restructuring/refacing the historic docks and restoring the land by removing all of the CPR foundations, track beds and other structures. I have included a copy of the Keewatin/ CIM lease.

While we hope this arrangement can be done quickly we are also aware of due process. Our purpose today is to put the conversation on the table so it can be a factor as that process unfolds. We would hope that a similar lease can be negotiated for the park. As you know KEEWATIN has invested heavily in large public washrooms and begun some of the gardening.

Throughout the turmoil of being forced to look for another home for KEEWATIN after the initial sale to CIM, "Friends of Keewatin" have come to be even more convinced Port McNicoll is the only location for this great Canadian artifact. The support we received from the community and visitors at large to work to be able to stay was incredible. I know TAY council feels the same.

Currently we are near the end of a process that started last spring to apply to Heritage Canada to be a Category B Institution Museum. Firstly this will allow Friends of Keewatin to apply for a tax receipt for SKYLINE Investments so they can gift KEEWATIN to the charity. This will also open a number of doors and give opportunity for funding programs as Friends of Keewatin will own the ship. Skyline will remain a funding sponsor. We were very pleased at the outcome of the arms length appraisal that set KEEWATIN's value at $48.7 million dollars. We have been able to complete approximately 90% of the restorations with the last major $200,000. project a complete scrape and paint this spring.

We had a great year last year with 14,000 visitors and a season finishing GHOST TOURS in partnership with the Georgian Bay Secondary School. We had a PBS movie shoot and plans are for a possible Netflix movie this year. We have some major promotions this year with Canada Post and we are negotiating for a large number of tourists from China benefiting both St Marie and Keewatin within Tay.

We also believe this is the time to get a head start on how the park will look. While a plan was commissioned several years ago, with all of the changes and opportunities available, we would like to ask that TAY establish a committee to relook at the park . Friends of Keewatin are prepared to find funding to make the park on Talbot match the Canadian Treasure it hosts and as we are managing the maintenance and upkeep we have some observations and ideas that would help in a new design.

Basically we think the park should be designed to honour the history of Tay' Townships three towns Victoria Harbour, Waubaushene, and Port McNicoll.

I will be glad to take any questions..

Eric Conroy

The RJ and Diane Peterson KEEWATIN Foundation

"FRIENDS OF KEEWATIN" 311 Talbot Street, PO B0x 189 Port McNicoll, Ont. Registered Charity Number 81676 3536 RR0001 The RJ and Diane Peterson KEEWATIN Foundation

Board Members.

1. Ralph Lindzon Ralph is a Lawyer who works principally on regulatory matters for participants in the securities industry, financings and other securities regulatory matters .While on contract with the Ontario Securities Commission, Ralph was the principal drafter of the Canadian portion of the multijurisdictional disclosure system, worked with the Securities and Exchange Commission on coordinating the drafting of the U.S. part, and worked with the state securities regulators on drafting corresponding state legislation. Ralph has also worked in Hong Kong as director of take-overs and mergers of the Securities and Futures Commission; Japan, where he worked on large numbers of financings; and London, England, where he worked on a U.K. privatization that included a public offering in Canada. Ralph has been a member of the Board of the RJ and Diane Keewatin Foundation since its inception and has acted as secretary. Ralph lives in Port McNicoll Ontario and has been an active volunteer writing grant proposals for Keewatin since 2013..

2. Charles S. Cutts, A Chartered Accountant by trade, Charlie is a currently consultant to the arts and entertainment community. Charlie lives in Scarborough Ontario and retired after 33 years as President and CEO of Roy Thomson and Massey Hall and previously the O’Keefe Centre. These organizations consistently presented the best artists in the world while maintaining an enviable record of responsible financial stewardship. Numerous industry and civic awards mark his achievements both as a professional and as a volunteer contributing to the positive reputation and overall vibrancy of Toronto. Currently Charlie is a director and secretary to the Glenn Gould Foundation and he Co-Chairs a campaign for Scarborough Hospital. Charlie has been a regular visitor to Keewatin and has consulted as a volunteer on several projects.

3. The Hon. Robert Runciman. Robert William "Bob" Runciman (born August 10, 1942) is from Brockville and is a veteran Canadian politician and former provincial Leader of the Opposition in the Ontario Legislature First elected to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in 1981, he held the seat continuously for Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario for the next 29 years. On January 29, 2010, he was appointed to a federal legislative position as a Conservative to the Senate of Canada [2] where he served until August 10, 2017. Before going to Queen's Park, Runciman owned a local weekly newspaper, and sat as a municipal councillor in Brockville from 1972 to 1981. He also worked in production management in the chemical industry. Recently, the Honourable Michael Tibollo, Ontario Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport, has announced the appointment of Senator Bob Runciman as the new Chair of the St. Lawrence Parks Commission (SLPC). He will begin his four-year term immediately. Senator Runciman opened the KEEWATIN officially to the public in 2012 on its return to Canada and has been a supporter ever since. 4. Rev. Canon John A. Read The Rev Canon John A Read from Toronto is married to Janet who is a visual artist and musician. The Read’s have two married children and two granddaughters. John and family have been large contributors to the “Friends of Keewatin” over the years. John completed his undergrad and M.Div at Trinity College in Toronto and was ordained Deacon in 1979 and Priest in 1980. Following a Curacy at St Jude’s Wexford, in Scarborough, John served in three parishes as Incumbent /Rector. These were the Parish of Innisfil which included south Barrie, the town Church of St John the Evangelist, Port Hope for 18 years, and then 10 years at Grace Church, Markham to spearhead a congregational rebuild. John is presently an Honourary Assistant at St Clement's Anglican Church in North Toronto and has over 40 years of pastoral experience. He has been described as a change agent. In addition to historic ships and trains, John's interests include church growth and renewal events across North America, attending concerts, travelling, gardening, genealogy, Canadian history, spending time at the family cottage at Big Bay Point near Barrie, and above all enjoying time with his family and granddaughters. 5. Corey Keeble, Curator, Emeritus. Corey Keeble was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and is a graduate of United College (now the University of Winnipeg). In 1967, he went to England on the final eastward passage of the Queen Mary to begin postgraduate studies in art history with Stella Mary Newton at the Courtauld Institute of Art during the tenure of the late Professor Sir Anthony Blunt On completion of his postgraduate studies, Corey joined the ROM's curatorial staff working for the European Department (later Western Art & Culture; now World Cultures). Corey is a recognized authority on the history of Renaissance and Baroque bronze sculpture and European arms and armour. His interests include Medieval sculpture, Gothic and Gothic Revival architecture, Medieval and Modern stained glass, the Russian Orthodox Church, icons, Judaica, and ships (he is a well-known lecturer on the Titanic) as well as firefighting apparatus. He is a frequent speaker at Toronto churches and synagogues on subjects ranging from liturgical art to stained glass. Corey has written numerous catalogues and articles, and has been a regular contributor to Arms Collecting, and to the ROM Magazine. Among his major publications is the catalogue The Honourable Henry N. R. Jackman Collection of Toy Soldiers in the ROM, published in 2002. He is currently working on publications on gunlocks, stained glass, Winnipeg architecture, firefighting apparatus, and crossbows. Corey speaks French, German, and Italian, and has a reading knowledge of several other European languages An avid lecturer on Toronto architectural history — notably Gothic Revival church architecture — Corey has led many walking tours of old Toronto for such organizations as the William Morris Society and the Canadian Society for Decorative Arts. His walking tours have included surveys of historic Toronto churches and synagogues, including the historic synagogues of the Kensington Market area. His Canadian art and architecture tours have included Kingston, Ottawa, Hamilton, and other Ontario towns and cities. In recent years he has become equally well-known for his architectural walking tours of New York City and for similar tours of other American cities. The study of passenger ships of the 1800s-early 1900s is of particular interest to him, most notably at present the S.S. Keewatin of 1907, which is of special importance by virtue of its date, its rarity, and most importantly of all, its importance to Canada as an icon of Canadian national, cultural and artistic history.

6. Roy V. Berlinquette Roy who lives in Ottawa is a Keewatin enthusiast and was Master of Ceremonies on July 8 2017 for the unveiling of the Canada 150 project, the rebuilding of the Gateway to the West Confederation docks in Port McNicoll which was a “Friends of Keewatin” project. Roy is a recognized team builder with 36 years of public service with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) emerged from an entry-level position to senior executive levels in corporate, operational and administrative areas to Deputy Commissioner of the North West Region. His recent accomplishments include being a member of the Office of the Oversight Commission on the Reform of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and Vice-President of a consulting company specializing in risk management, comptrollership and investigations. 7. Nahanni Born Nahanni is the Executive Director of the Huronia Museum in Midland Ontario and a long- time resident of Port McNicoll Nahanni attended the University of Vienna, in Vienna, Austria studying linguistics. With over 30 years of heritage preservation experience, Nahanni began her museum career at a national historic site in 1987. Nahanni has extensive experience in heritage interpretation. She is a nationally certified Heritage Interpreter and Evaluator for the CTHRC. Nahanni assisted with the development of national occupational standards for heritage interpreters in Canada and continued as a content contributor to the textbook used to train and evaluate Heritage Interpreters. Throughout her career, she has authored and implemented numerous interpretative plans at museums and natural heritage sites in the province of Ontario. Nahanni also has over 30 years of successful project management experience. She has worked in both Canada and Europe executing NGO and non-profit fundraising programs, capacity building exercises and strategic planning sessions 8. Blake Lyon Blake Lyon has an extensive experience in hotel and resort asset management in Canada and Internationally. Before joining Skyline, Mr. Lyon served as the CEO of some of the largest family offices in Canada and was responsible for the management of assets totaling $9B. He was also the CFO at Brookfield Asset Management, a position he held for five years. An experienced, well-rounded executive who leads with skill, confidence and passion. Highly efficient, creative thinker experienced in multiple industries. A self-motivated, confident and pragmatic leader comfortable working under deadline pressures and in dealing with difficult decisions. 9. Rob Waxman ( Director Secretary Treasurer) Robert brings with him over 20 years of experience in accounting, finance, and real estate. Prior to this appointment, as CFO of Skyline Investments Inc., Mr. Waxman led Deloitte’s Real Estate Practice’s Finance Modernization & Effectiveness advisory group and advised CFO clients on real estate operating efficiencies, financing, and capital markets. Previously Mr. Waxman held the CFO position at real estate company CHC Student Housing Group of Companies, which specializes in student housing real estate investments.

Part I - Updated Estimate of

Fair Market Value

of the S.S. Keewatin

in September 2018

05 October 2018

Part I

INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC.

5 October 2018

The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0

Ladies & Gentlemen

We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board.

This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.

The information provided from Other Sources is described in the various underlying reports and in the Section “Documents Used”. The authenticity of the Ship is based on the Declaration of Authenticity prepared by K. Coley Keeble as cited above.

This appraisal estimates the Fair Market Value of the physical property and any acquired characteristics of value. The scope of work is described in Part I of the Report in a Section, starting on Page 10, under that heading and the individual underlying valuation reports in Part II of the Report.

Yours very truly, Corporate Valuation Services Limited

Per

James P. Catty, MA, CPA•CA, CBV, CPA/ABV, CFA, ICVS, CGMA, CFE President

INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 1

ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE Table of Contents – Part I ENGAGEMENT ...... 1 THE CANADIAN CULTURAL PROPERTY EXPORT REVIEW BOARD ...... 3 FAIR MARKET VALUE ...... 4 VALUATION APPROACHES ...... 6 SCOPE OF WORK ...... 10 HISTORIC SHIPS ...... 12 VALUE – HULL & STRUCTURE ...... 16 VALUE – MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & RELATED ASSETS ...... 20 VALUE – DISPLAYS & ACCESSORIES ...... 21 REASONED JUSTIFICATION ...... 22 CONCLUSION OF VALUE...... 24 DOCUMENTS USED ...... 25 RESTRICTIONS AND QUALIFICATIONS ...... 27 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS ...... 28 CERTIFICATE ...... 29 Schedule A – Museum Ships ...... 30

ENGAGEMENT Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc. (“Skyline”), the owner of the 1907 Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin (“Keewatin” or the “Ship), intends to donate it to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). On behalf of the Foundation, Skyline, by an Engagement Letter approved on 19 September 2018, instructed Corporate Valuation Services Limited (“CVS) to prepare an update (the “Report”), as of September 2018 (the “Valuation Date”), to our Comprehensive Valuation Report dated 30 January, 2018 (the “Original Report”), setting out its current Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Ship, still anchored at Port McNicoll, Ontario. The Foundation is a registered Canadian charity responsible for the care, operation and promotion of the Keewatin. Its mission is to promote participation and passion for the Ship. The Foundation aims to educate the public on the Keewatin’s history and its contribution to Canada as well as to ensure that the Edwardian vessel has long-term viability, while remaining responsible and respectful of the Ship’s heritage. It also takes fiscal responsibility for the Keewatin’s preservation and continued operation. The Foundation’s goal is to be recognized as a role-model charitable organization in terms of governance, sponsorship and financial strength and to offer the ultimate marine-based historic entertainment experience by which all similar venues are measured. It strives to be the accessible custodian of generations of dreams and memories that is being enhanced by expanding the Keewatin into a “living facility”. It is operated by a group of dedicated volunteers from the community for the benefit of all, providing a venue for education, celebration and various events that will reinforce the values and traditions of the Maritime History of the Great Lakes and the importance of the contributions made to the development of Canada as a whole. The Foundation therefore intends to apply to have the Ship classified as an object of cultural property considered to be of “Outstanding Significance and National Importance” by the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board (the “Board”). This Updated Valuation Report, dated 5 October 2018, has been prepared in accordance with the Standards of the Canadian Institute of Business Valuators and the (US) Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP). It adopts the Board’s definitions of Fair Market Value set out in the May 2015 Application Guide “Certification of Cultural Property for Income Tax Purposes by the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board” (the “Guide”): “The highest price, expressed in terms of money, that a property would bring in an open and unrestricted market, between a willing buyer and a willing seller who are both knowledgeable, informed, and prudent, and who are acting independently of each other.” The application of this definition is discussed in the Section Fair Market Value below.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 1

An old ship tied up at dockside, without attention, will decay and eventually sink; recent practice has been to form a preservation organization, solicit donations, organize volunteer labour from enthusiasts, and open the restored vessel to the public. Since the S.S. Keewatin returned to Port McNicoll in June 2012, the Foundation has undertaken this task. During 2015, CVS first visited the Ship, and on February 4, 2016 prepared a Preliminary Valuation Report establishing a Fair Market Value of $31,500,000 for the Keewatin. In November 2017, all of the experts involved visited the Ship for the purpose of the Original Report. For this update, 10 months later, only Jim Catty and Valerie Brown inspected the Ship. This Report is Part I of the complete document. Part II is the Original Report dated 30 January 2018 and addressed to the Town of Midland. It was prepared, as of November 2017, for a donation that was never completed. A full description of the S.S. Keewatin including photographs, together with its history, will be found in Appendix 3 of Part II, Pages 7 to 13 and 17 to 67. In this Report, as in the Original Report, all amounts are in Canadian funds, unless otherwise indicated such as US$, € (Euro) or £ (Sterling).

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 2

THE CANADIAN CULTURAL PROPERTY EXPORT REVIEW BOARD The Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board is an independent, quasi-judicial decision- making body that reports to Parliament through the Minister of Canadian Heritage. It was established in 1977 by the Cultural Property Export and Import Act, to determine whether an item of cultural property, such as the Ship, is of outstanding significance and national importance (“OS/NI”); the intention is to protect and preserve Canada's artistic, historic, and scientific heritage and make it accessible to the public. The Board’s mandate is to:

• certify cultural property as being of outstanding significance and national importance; • establish export delays to provide designated organizations with an opportunity to acquire significant cultural property threatened with permanent export; and • determine fair cash offers to purchase cultural property for refused export permits.

Cultural property refers to artistic, historic, or scientific objects that may fall into any of the following categories:

• objects recovered from the soil or waters of Canada; • objects of ethnographic material culture; • military objects; • objects of applied and decorative art; • objects of fine art; • scientific or technological objects; • textual records, graphic records, and audio-visual recordings; and • musical instruments.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 3

FAIR MARKET VALUE

As previously stated, the Board’s definition of Fair Market Value is “The highest price, expressed in terms of money, that a property would bring in an open and unrestricted market, between a willing buyer and a willing seller who are both knowledgeable, informed, and prudent, and who are acting independently of each other.” The Board considers the following factors to be implicit in this definition: 1. Highest price means the highest price that is consistently achieved; 2. The transaction occurs in the market where such properties are most commonly and consistently sold to the public; 3. The public is the usual purchaser or ultimate consumer; 4. An ultimate consumer is a person, institution or corporation who does not hold the item for subsequent resale; 5. The appropriate or relevant market is the most active one for the particular asset and is determined by the frequency and total number of sales; 6. The buyer and seller are typically motivated, where neither is under compulsion to buy or sell; 7. Each party is knowledgeable, informed of all of the relevant facts and acting in their own best interests; 8. An unrestricted and open market is one that is available to the public; 9. The property has been exposed to the market for an adequate period; 10. The transaction is not influenced by restrictions that would have a significant effect on the price; for example, a forced sale; and 11. Payment is in Canadian dollars. Highest Price The Board believes certain aspects of Fair Market Value are widely misunderstood, particularly the meaning of “highest price” and “public”, and the issue of the appropriate or relevant market. Highest price means one that is consistently achieved. It does not include an extraordinary price that, when viewed in the context of the market for that asset, is an anomaly. Atypically high and low prices are irrelevant to Fair Market Value; statistically averaged prices may be distorted if the valuator includes abnormally high or low figures and the resulting value conclusion will be inaccurate. The frequency of a price being achieved and the total number of sales are most significant. Highest price does not mean the single highest price that has ever been achieved or could conceivably be achieved. Fair Market Value reflects the highest price at which an item might reasonably be expected to change hands in the normal course of business, in the usual market for that item, and is best indicated by a consistent pattern of sales; to quote the auction world about transactions : “One is a fluke, two is a coincidence, three is a trend, four is a market.” S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 4

Public equals Customary Purchaser Within the definition, the “public” refers to the customary purchaser for the item in its existing form when not bought for resale. It does not mean all purchasers. A customary purchaser is often an individual acquiring the item at the retail level but, in some circumstances, because of the nature of the goods (e.g. uncut gemstones), the customary purchaser may also be a wholesaler buying the item for resale. A customary purchaser may be an individual, a business, a museum or an institution. Selling Price and the Ultimate Consumer Fair Market Value represents the amount a property would bring in an open and unrestricted market, in other words, the amount, before taxes, a buyer would pay; for this purpose, the ultimate purchaser is the end-user. When an agent acquires an object for a client, the latter is both; the relevant price for estimating Fair Market Value is the amount paid by the person who will “enjoy” the property. If an end-user purchases an object at a discount, the relevant Fair Market Value is the amount actually paid. However, a discounted amount charged to a consultant/dealer is not relevant. In auctions, a buyer’s premium is customarily added to the hammer price, for Fair Market Value, that hammer price plus premium is relevant if paid by an end-user. Which Market? Many items, such as personal property, are traded in more than one market; establishing the most active one where sales are made to end users, is fundamental in determining Fair Market Value; to do so, the valuator must research and consider all those that are active. The appropriate market is the one in which such items are customarily purchased based on the frequency and number of sales. For example, if an artist’s work is most frequently sold through commercial galleries and only occasionally at auction, prices in the gallery market are relevant, but not those at auction. Similarly, if that artist’s work is offered for sale through a gallery but mainly bought directly from his studio, the relevant prices are those charged by the studio and not at the gallery, provided that the studio market is available to the public in an open and unrestricted manner. Sales that occur in the most active market available to the public are the best indicators of Fair Market Value.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 5

VALUATION APPROACHES In arriving at a value for any asset, consideration should be given as to which of the numerous valuation methods are appropriate in the circumstances; those chosen to arrive at a Fair Market Value will depend on the nature and quality of the asset, and its stage of development. Whenever practical, the conclusion should be reached by confirming and combining the outcomes of more than one method. These appropriate methods are divided into three basic approaches: Cost, Market and Income. Cost-Based amounts, which are normally found on Financial Statements, are a measure of value for only a limited range of items. However, replacement or reproduction cost is extremely useful for many capital items, such as real estate or plant & equipment. Market-Based Values, relying on comparisons with actual sales, are preferable, because they reflect real, rather than notional transactions. However, it is often difficult to find sale prices for transactions in comparable companies, assets or securities; therefore, for financial or intangible assets, Income-Based Values related to earnings or Cash Flows are generally used as the primary figure. The Board accepts only two valuation approaches: sales comparison and cost. One or both may be selected based on the availability of data and the purpose of the valuation. In this Valuation Report, CVS has applied both. Sales Comparison (Market) Approach

Fair Market Values are estimated by the sales comparison approach using a process of comparing an object with similar items sold around the effective date of the valuation, in the market where they are customarily bought by the public. Such data analysis combines sale prices with their relationships to attributes that contribute to or detract from value. Supportable conclusions of value are derived by comparing the characteristics of the property being appraised with the corresponding characteristics of sold items and making adjustments to reflect relevant differences. The reliability of this approach is dependent upon the degree of similarity between the donated object and the sold items, including their physical attributes and condition, the nature of the transactions, market conditions and time & location of the sale.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 6

Cost Approach

The cost approach is based on the principle of substitution, which states that an informed buyer would not pay more for an item than it would cost to acquire an equally desirable substitute. This approach is most typically used to estimate replacement cost for unique properties or when there is limited or no evidence of comparable sales. It compares the item being appraised with the cost to acquire, by purchase or production (e.g. by commission), a substitute that is comparable in all respects in the market and fashion in which it would customarily be acquired. Valuations of objects that are unique, oversized, site specific, or created in new media, for which there is usually a limited market, are special cases in which the production cost (including a creator’s fee) may be an important factor in determining Fair Market Value. In using this approach, the valuator must recognize that cost is not synonymous with value and that a property, such as an object certified by the Board, cannot be replaced by a new item or a reproduction. The valuator will therefore make adjustments to reflect the attributes of the appraised item that contribute to or detract from value such as condition, period, provenance, etc. In developing an estimate of Reproduction Cost New for an asset such as the S.S. Keewatin, there are three generally accepted methods: Detail Method, Trending Method and Cost-to- Capacity Method. Detail Method The detail or summation method requires that a current cost new be assigned to each individual component of an asset, which is itemized or “detailed” so that the total reflects the cost new of the asset; all normal direct and indirect costs are to be included. This method was considered but rejected as no “as-built” plans of the Ship exist. Trending Method The trending method estimates an asset’s Reproduction Cost New by applying an index or trend factor to its historical cost (the amount spent when it was first placed in service), so as to convert that expenditure into current dollars. As the original building contract in 1907 was in Pound Sterling and the many subsequent modifications in Canadian funds, no satisfactory historical cost can be established nor an appropriate index created; therefore, this method is not feasible. It has, however, been used as part of the reasoned justification. Cost-to-Capacity Method This method is based on the concept that the cost of similar assets of different sizes vary in a roughly linear fashion, with appropriate “valuation multiples” being obtainable from recent transactions. For the reasons previously set out, we consider it the only suitable method for the S.S. Keewatin.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 7

Reasoned Justification A new item or a reproduction cannot replace the individual value characteristics of an original. Therefore, the Board requires a valuator to develop a reasoned justification that explains how he arrived at his conclusion of value. This will take into consideration the reproduction cost as a reference point in conjunction with all other relevant factors. Specifically, the valuator must demonstrate a relationship between the market evidence available and the object being appraised, by taking into account such factors as rarity, quality, historical significance, provenance, literature references, the importance of the creator, sales in the past few years of comparable objects by the creator, recent sales of dissimilar objects by the creator or recent sales of related objects by creators of comparable stature. In doing so, the valuator will explain any adjustments made upward or downward from market indicators to arrive at the estimated value at the Valuation Date. The reasoned justification is especially important when there is a limited or non-existent market for the property, such as for a Museum Ship like the S.S. Keewatin. The valuator’s role, in such cases, is to place the property within the appropriate marketplace and to explain if the property were available for sale, in which market it would sell, the existence of willing buyers, their level of interest and how much they would be prepared to pay. To do this, the valuator needs to refer to a relevant property being sold in an identified market and justify why the item being appraised could feasibly be sold at the estimated value at the Valuation Date. As part of this exercise, the valuator may also wish to discuss the level of market activity when similar objects were available and sold. Blockage Discount A blockage discount is a valuation methodology to determine Fair Market Value for the donation of many similar objects in the same year by a single donor when their quantity exceeds the indicated demand. Such a discount is appropriate if their number is large in comparison with the volume generally sold annually so that they could not be moved at the typical asking prices, within a reasonable period, by experienced dealers following normal prudent business practices. Supply and demand is fundamental to value. Markets will only absorb a certain amount of an item before they become saturated and future demand is reduced. When a large number of similar items are offered for sale at one time, there are three possible outcomes: 1. The price of each individual item would be lower because the supply exceeds the demand; 2. The price of each individual item would increase because the offering of a large collection at one time would attract buyers from many different areas; or 3. The price of each individual item would not be affected because there are sufficient buyers to acquire them all.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 8

In considering a discount to reflect the possible negative effect of quantity, a valuator first determines the Fair Market Value of each item irrespective of their number, and then, if appropriate, applies a discount. The aggregate figure will generally be less than the total of the values of each individual object. In our view, no blockage discount is applicable to any of the assets included in the Ship. Premiums/Added Value The Board has taken the position that premiums, other than those applied by auction houses, placed on the total estimated value of a collection, do not necessarily reflect market conditions at the time of donation. Therefore, such premiums will not automatically be considered as part of Fair Market Value. The Board reviews such situations on a case by case basis. After considering the information before it, such as the integrity of a particular collection, the impact of dismantling the collection, its relevance as a whole to the objectives of the applicant institution and hence to the Canadian heritage, the Board may decide to accept a suitable percentage increase in value, where it deems appropriate. No premium or added value has been applied to the individual values of any of the relevant assets, but a 10% Museum Ship premium has been applied to the total of the Fair Market Values for the Hull & Structures and the Machinery, Equipment & Related Assets to reflect the special nature of Museum Ships.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 9

SCOPE OF WORK The Ship and all its artifacts consist of a large number of objects that have to be individually identified, recorded and appraised. Therefore, in 2017, CVS divided the valuation process into three logical elements: 1. Hull & Structures (the key component with a Condition Report as well as a valuation) 2. Machinery & Equipment and Related Assets (items essential to the operation of the Ship) 3. Artifacts (items, some of which were not originally part of the Ship, considered necessary to enhance a visitor’s experience) To undertake these assignments, we assembled an experienced inter-disciplinary professional team:

Jim Catty - Corporate Valuation Services Ltd. Project Leader Tom Roberts - Compass Maritime Services LLC Hull & Structure Ian Cameron - North American Marine, Inc. Condition Report Gilles Moss - G.R. Moss Appraisals Inc. Machinery & Equipment Valerie Brown - Belleholme Management Inc. Artifacts Mary Lou Quesnelle – Keewatin Archivist

Jim Catty was born in England but grew up partially in the United States. After Oxford, he moved to Canada and became a CPA with a predecessor pf PWC. From 1960 to 1971, he was in investment industry in Toronto and New York. After serving as a Special Advisor to the Minister of Finance (Canada), he has specialized in valuation work mainly about Intellectual Property. He has had assignments valuing businesses and their financial, physical & intangible assets in Canada, the United States and 11 other countries for more than 60 years. He has written over 100 articles and conference presentations. Tom Roberts has spent more than 20 years valuing ships and wrote a case on the subject for the Harvard Business School. Ian Cameron has been a marine engineer for over 50 years, specializing in surveys on behalf of insurers of ships’ hulls and other marine risks in North America. He is accredited by the (US) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Gilles Moss has been involved with the appraisal of a variety of machinery & equipment in Canada and the United States for more than 40 years. Valerie Brown, for thirty years, valued items of personal property for Waddington’s Auctioneers & Appraisers.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 10

During November 2017, all of the experts visited the Keewatin as set out in the Original Report (Part II). In September 2018, CVS did not consider it necessary to update the Condition Report as the Foundation had maintained the Ship in excellent shape. All the other experts revised and updated their previous work products. Details of the work undertaken by each expert are set out in their November reports in Part II: Ian Cameron – Appendix 2 Tom Roberts – Appendix 3 Gilles Moss – Appendix 4 Valerie Brown – Appendix 5

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 11

HISTORIC SHIPS

Ships Launched in 2007

Sea travel has a long history dating back to before the Phoenicians and Homer. However, the ravages of the elements, the high cost of marine maintenance and being replaced by rail, car and aircraft resulted in the eventual destruction of nearly all ships ever built, often by sinking, but usually by being broken up with the material sold for scrap. Through intensive search as set out in Schedule 1, we were able to trace 450 ships as having been launched during 1907 – 112 years ago - in 22 countries:

Canada 9 2.0% France 22 4.9% Germany 28 6.2% Netherlands 34 7.6% Norway 13 2.9% Russia 23 5.1% UK 210 46.7% US 72 16.0% 14 Countries with 5 or less 39 8.7% 450 100.0%

Obviously, there are some we cannot trace; but, the dominance and strength of the UK production, especially in Scotland, was extreme. This is demonstrated by the CPR’s decision to build the Keewatin and its sister ship, the Assiniboia, there rather than in Canada where they were to be in service. Our sample is dominated by cargo ships (25.6%) and naval vessels (24.0%), and includes those having a wide range of uses:

Naval Battleship 7 1.6% Cruiser 23 5.1% Destroyer 56 12.4% Submarine 20 4.4% Other 2 0.4% 108 24.0%

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 12

Commercial Barge 24 5.3% Cargo Ship 115 25.6% Ferry 23 5.1% Fishing Vessel 45 10.0% Ocean Liner 19 4.2% Steamship 16 3.6% Tug 27 6.0% Other 6 1.3% 275 61.1% Sailing Ship 13 2.9% Service Vessel 4 0.9% Yacht 50 11.1% 450 100.0%

Of all those ships, only 51 (11.3%) still exist, with 169 (37.5%) having been sunk and 156 (34.7%) scrapped. Sometimes, as with the 11 that became Museum Ships, survival was because of historical significance, but more often due to luck and circumstance. If any of those Museum Ships were to be abandoned, they would join the numerous lost treasures that have been allowed to deteriorate or be destroyed by past global conflict.

Museum Ships

Vessels of historic interest are often transferred to preservation organizations operated by volunteers in locations with which they have a connection. This has been done for the 11 Museum Ships that were launched in 1907, with two from that year listed on the (US) National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The Dutch have a similar designation, Cultural Historic Monument, that has been applied to 16 ships from the same year (12 barges, 2 yachts, a tug and a fishing vessel).

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 13

Country Ship Type Bulgaria Drazki Destroyer Canada Helena Tug Canada Keewatin Ocean Liner Finland Tarmo Icebreaker Germany Andechs Ferry Germany Hildegard Buoy Tender Germany Steppke Tug Netherlands Antje Rebecca Yacht Netherlands Roeireddingboot No 15 Life Boat US Hercules Tug US Ambrose Lightship NRHP Pegasus Tug NRHP F.C. Lewis Jr. Fishing Vessel

Those 11, vintage 1907 Museum Ships, form only 1.8% of the 631 Museum Ships (129 launched before 1911) established in 54 countries that are listed in Schedule A that updates Schedule 2 in Part II; there may still be some more that have not been located. The US leads with 218 (34.5%), while Canada has less than its traditional one-tenth of the US at 20.

Such exhibition ships are very much loved by the public; as far as attendance is concerned, the Vasa, a Swedish 1628 galleon, is the leader with over 1,300,000 visitors a year; a number, such as the Viking ships in Oslo, Portsmouth Historic Dockyard in the UK and several US warships, exceed 500,000. In view of this, many tourism specialists consider the appeal of an interesting old vessel or even a replica on a city waterfront to be sufficiently strong that every port should showcase one; visiting them assists in understanding life on-board in a bygone era.

The number of paying visitors (children under 16 are free) to the Keewatin has steadily increased, rising nearly 80% from about 7,000 in 2013 (the first full year at Port McNicoll) to around 12,500 in 2018, the season is the Victoria Day weekend to Thanksgiving. Before the Ship returned to Canada in June 2012, it had been docked at Saugatuck, Michigan from 1967 to 2012. At that location, attendance is believed not to have exceeded 5,000 visitors per year. An important aspect is the distinction between a real Museum Ship, such as S.S. Keewatin, and a replica. When repairs accumulate, in some cases less and less of the vessel is authentic as the lack of old parts or appropriate tools may lead to the use of modern "short-cuts", for instance, welding rather than riveting. Visitors without a historical background should be able to distinguish between an original museum ship and a more or less historically relevant tourist attraction. The restoration of the S.S. Keewatin has managed to almost exclusively rely on traditional tools and methods, including, when necessary, hand-made replacement parts.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 14

In addition to the United States, 16 countries have six or more Museum Ships. The most famous, from earlier times, after the Vasa, is HMS Victory, Nelson’s flagship at the battle of Trafalgar in 1805. It is kept, together with Henry VIII’s Mary Rose (1545), at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard in the UK.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 15

VALUE – HULL & STRUCTURE In reaching its Estimate of Fair Market Value of S.S. Keewatin, CVS relied to considerable degree on the conclusions of the other experienced specialists in the team. With respect to the Hull & Structure, we first, in late August 2017, commissioned an inspection report (survey) from North American Marine, Inc. of St. Catharines, ON (Appendix 2). Its conclusion was: “As far as may be ascertained from a general examination of the vessel afloat, without making removals or opening up to expose parts ordinarily concealed or testing for tightness, it is the opinion of the undersigned that the vessel is structurally sound and is considered to be in excellent and serviceable condition for its intended use as a floating, maritime museum attraction in fresh water with appropriate maintenance for up to another 80 years.” The Foundation is ensuring the Ship gets proper maintenance. The following list 20 projects, completed in 2018 to the end of September, were supplied by the General Manager. MANAGEMENT REPORT OF ALL PROJECTS COMPLETED ON S.S. KEEWATIN IN 2008 1. Storm Deck (Roof). Because of ice damage from an April storm and condition of the top deck of Keewatin, the entire deck had to be restored from steel shell up. The roof was ½ inch wood lay on a steel frame and covered with stiff but flexible matting. This matting was a weave of hemp and fabric from 1907. It was replaced with sheets of 1/8 inch marine-grade plywood, with all rotted boards replaced. Then it has been covered with a polyester fabric. In turn, this is covered with an acrylic “elastomeric” liquid rubber coating to a thickness of 28 mm. This treatment is specifically designed and formulated for large surface marine roof coverings; in all we have restored 1,200 square meters of area with 360 litres of this product. 2. Ladies Lounge. Replace all ceiling panels, repair wooden “under structure” and light fixtures, where needed, caulk and paint entire room. Install new wooden floor with appropriate wood to match all existing wood. 3. Cargo Deck, retail store area. Install ¾” plywood over raw steel hull with electrical outlets, prime and paint. 4. Theatre. Design, build and install mini theatre for handicapped visitors. Work includes all electrical, drapes and paint. 5. Upgrade Cargo hold display area. Scrape and paint floor and hull, where needed. Increase number of electrical plugs, spotlights and appropriate signs. 6. Build reading Library area. 7. Restoration of significant kitchen food preparation items: 1900’s electric potato peeler, original Hobart mixer, meat slicer, juicer, mass toast oven. 8. Rebuild wheelhouse, recaulk windows, and replace interior doors with proper outside doors.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 16

9. Rebuild all 4 sets of stairs on both Port and Starboard leading to wheelhouse. Stain and finish with 5 coats of varnish. Install rails to code, repair/replace all hardware. 10. Refinish the entire handrail surrounding the ship’s Promenade deck, by sanding and applying 5 coats of varnish. 11. Prep, prime and repaint all hallways within passenger area of ship. 12. Ballroom ceiling. Complete repair/replace and refinish due to water damage from ice storm. 13. Restoring guest rooms for staging. Have completely renovated another 5 guest rooms and starboard rear hall leading to Engineering and steering engine. 14. Windless Room (anchors). Complete restoration and paint of the machine and the room including side hall and stairs to Cargo Deck.

Methodology Adopted As there is no market for Museum Ships, it was necessary to adopt the Cost Approach. To this end, we engaged the US specialist firm Compass Maritime Services LLC of Teaneck NJ (Port of New York) to determine the Reproduction Cost New of the Keewatin. After extensive research described on pages 4 & 5 of their Original Desktop Valuation Report (Appendix 3), they decided to adopt the Cost-to-Capacity Method described in the Original Report. This was applied by considering not only the suitable yards that could build the Ship, but also comparable vessels recently built or currently under construction; those selected are set out in Appendix No.1 to the Compass Report. From this information they developed pertinent valuation multiples, taking into account that in 1907 passengers expected somewhat less luxury than those in 2017 and that they would be on board for only three days rather than a week or more. Compass also considered the fact that the unit cost of a smaller ship is higher than for a larger one. The result was a figure in the US $120 million range for the Reproduction Cost New. Initially this required adjustment for the extra costs of the Ship’s special features, such as a half inch rather than three-eights inch plate hull, being riveted not welded and, in order to fit through the previous Welland Canal, the ability to be divided into two sections in Quebec City and then reassembled in Buffalo. Finally, reductions were made in the value for certain excluded items, such as the boilers and quadruple expansion steam engine (page 14 of their original report, Appendix 3), to arrive at a final Reproduction Cost New of US $85 million as at November 8, 2017 (the date of Tom Roberts’ visit). Converted to Canadian funds at the exchange rate of that date (US $1.00 equals $1.2905), the amount becomes $108,200,000 (rounded).

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 17

Conclusion Schedule C sets out their updated Desktop Valuation Certificate stating an unchanged value of Eighty-five Million United States Dollars (US$85,000,000) as of September 20, 2018. Converted to Canadian funds at the exchange rate on that date (US$1.00 equals $1.2905) it is $102,692,500. To turn this figure into a current Fair Market Value, deductions must be made for depreciation. For the Hull & Structure, three types of depreciation were considered: Physical Deterioration due to wear and tear; Functional Obsolescence due to the Ship’s inability to operate as a passenger liner: and Technological Obsolescence as she operated on coal-generated steam power rather than the current diesel engines. In our view, a time allocation is suitable to adjust for the Physical Deterioration. Based on Ian Cameron’s Report of Inspection (Appendix 2-Part II) the remaining useful life was 80 years in 2017. This would a current reduction of 58.4% (111 years elapsed divided by a total life of 190 years [111 years elapsed + 79 years to come]). With respect to Functional Obsolescence, the deduction has to reflect alternative uses for the Keewatin from being a passenger liner, such as the Museum Ship she has been for the last 50 years and will be for the remainder of her 190-year career. With passenger service (1908-1967) taking up only 30% (57 years divided by 190) of the Ship’s life, we have deducted 15% (half that amount) as a suitable provision. As far as technological obsolescence is concerned, in our view, not only is no deduction required, but with one of only three functioning quadruple expansion nautical steam engines in the world, the other two powering the rebuilt yacht Delphine (see Part II), the Keewatin deserves a premium. These adjustments result in a Fair Market Value of $38,750,000 for the Hull & Structure as shown in the table on the next page.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 18

Fair Market Value Keewatin Hull & Strusture US$ $ Reproduction Cost New 85,000,000 109,692,500 Exchange Rate September 20, 2018 US$= 1.2905 Physical Deterioration Current Life 111 Years 58.4% Remaining Useful Life 79 Years 41.6% Estimated Total Life 190 Years 100.0% Physical Deterioration Factor 58.4% (64,083,513) Depreciated Reproduction Cost Hull & Structure 45,608,987 Funcional Obsolesance as Passenger Ship 15.0% (6,841,348) Fair Market Value Hull & Structure 38,767,639 Rounded 38,750,000

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 19

VALUE – MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & RELATED ASSETS With respect to the Machinery, Equipment & Related Assets, which cover every item relating to the Ship not included by Compass, CVS engaged Gilles R. Moss an experienced Canadian appraiser of Machinery & Equipment. His report (Schedule C) deals with over 600 articles of which five represent 74% as shown in the table below:

Major Items of Equipment on S S Keewatin

Value Item $ a) Quadruple Expansion Steam Engine 3,115,000 61.9% b) Scotch Type Boilers 318,000 6.3% c) Double Chain Anchor Windlas 116,000 2.3% d) Stearing Gear Engine 98,000 1.9% e) Ship Propeller 65,000 1.3% Total for Group 3,712,000 73.8% All Other Items 1,318,000 26.2%

Total for all items 5,030,000 100.0%

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 20

VALUE – DISPLAYS & ACCESSORIES Although representing less than 1% of the aggregate Fair Market Value, the large number of small value Displays & Accessories (artifacts), although individually of small values, are essential to the success of the S.S. Keewatin as a Museum Ship. Through her private company, Belleholme Management Inc., Ms. Brown valued them at $315,000 in total, as follows:

$ Clothing & Accessories 10,484 Barber's Shop & Souvenirs 3,650 Luggage & Cameras 4,420 Artwork 10,075 Displays 3,990 Linens & Blankets 18,250 Furniture & Office Equipment 50,290 Clocks & Decorative Items 25,000 Flatware, Dinnerware & Utensils 61,253 Carpets 9,450 Uniforms 4,105 Ephemera 12,830 Model Boats 103,850 Total 317,647 Rounded 315,000

After revisiting the Ship and reviewing her work Ms. Brown confirmed her previous values in a letter (Schedule D).

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 21

REASONED JUSTIFICATION CVS realizes that a modern replica of the S.S. Keewatin would be totally different from the original, but there is not and cannot ever be a market for museums or Museum Ships, as each is an individual collection of numerous examples from the past. In this case, the Ship is a unique, extremely well-preserved set that is in effect a complete unit. Therefore, to establish the Fair Market Value of the Hull & Structure as well as for certain items of Machinery, Equipment & Related Assets, CVS had to rely on the Cost Approach. According to Gowrie Group, a specialized firm in Westbrook, CT, that insures historic naval ships, one basis for determining insurance value is Reproduction Cost New. During its lifetime, the Ship underwent a number of upgrades, such as a complete set of new furniture from the T. Eaton Company in 1953. When she was decommissioned, much of the original furnishings were sold off, with numerous items being purchased by Port McNicoll residents. Since the Ship’s return to Canada in 2012, many of those goods have either been donated back or acquired by Skyline. The interior is now virtually completely restored to her condition in 1965, the last year of commercial operation. To enhance a visitor’s experience, many cabins have been furnished with artifacts from one of the 57 years of the Ship’s active life (1908-1965) and there are numerous pertinent displays on the main deck. These “Displays & Accessories”, while less than 1% of the aggregate Fair Market Value, are an important feature much admired, especially by young visitors. While the hull was built in Scotland in 1907, the Ship was fitted out in Owen Sound, Ontario, during 1908, by the finest Canadian craftsmen then available to the CPR and is the only surviving example of their marine work. It is not the product of a single artist but of many artisans. It remains totally authentic, adhering to its original lay-out with no significant changes; as mentioned above, she is now almost fully restored to her 1965 condition. Today the Keewatin, unlike any replica, is complete in every respect except for the stern anchor that remains in Michigan; the bow remains with the Ship. Even though there is no apparent market for Museum Ships, they have significant value as they draw tourists, in some cases, as discussed under MUSEUM SHIPS, substantial crowds. The Keewatin has the proven potential to do so, as it is not only important to Canadians and Canada, but an example of maritime history on a world-wide basis. As there is no way of practically applying any other methods CVS, using both the Market and Cost Approaches, has developed the amount of $48, 750,000 as its Estimate of Fair Market Value. This is a slight increase from the $48,300,00 of November 2017.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 22

That figure is supported by the offering for sale in 2015 of the only possible comparison CVS could find, the 1921 steam yacht “Delphine”. Commissioned by the auto magnate Horace Dodge, that vessel has two quadruple expansion steam engines designed by him and was completed after his death. Delphine is rather smaller than the Keewatin (79m rather than 107m long and 1,950 gross tons rather 3,856) but more luxurious and 14 years younger. Using a factor of 1.66 to adjust for the greater size, the EURO 19,700,000 asking price (reduced from € 38 million) is equivalent to $48,790,000, converted at EURO 1.00=$1.492, the exchange rate at October 5, 2018. Further support to the value of the Hull & Structure is given by the Trending Method previously discussed. The original charge in 1907 by Fairfield’s for both the Keewatin and its sister ship the Assiniboia was £ 159,140 or £ 79,572 for the Ship. This, according to Measuring Worth was equivalent to a 2017 equivalent cost of £73,740,000 ($122,700,000 converted at £1.00 = $1.6638), This expenditure is only estimated to be only about 80% of the Ships total cost, as it does not include the fitting out by the CPR in Canada, nor any subsequent improvements. Based on this, the total cost in 2017 Canadian dollars, would be approximately $153,375,000; this method confirms that Compass’s US$120 million ($152,750,000) is a reasonable base figure for Reproduction Cost New, as the two amounts are within 0.5% of each other. Museum Ship Premium As discussed previously, under Technological Obsolescence, the Keewatin is a unique, functioning example of an Edwardian ocean liner, effectively preserved in a time capsule for 50 years. In its present state, even though there is no market for Museum Ships, a conversation with our related firm in China indicated that a possible buyer for the Ship could likely be found in that country. Such a purchaser would need to pay a buyer’s premium. Auction houses typically charge 15% but for larger transactions (over US$ 25 million -$31,00,000) reduce the rate to 10%. In our view such a premium is appropriate in determining the Fair Market Value of a Museum Ship and we have included it in our $48,750,000 Estimate of Fair Market Value.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 23

CONCLUSION OF VALUE Based on the information and documents reviewed, the explanations received and research undertaken as set out in Schedules c and Appendices 2 to 5 of Part II, and subject to the Assumptions, Restrictions and Qualifications listed in this Valuation Report, our Estimate of Fair Market Value, as at September 2018, of Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, for the stated purpose, is FORTY-EIGHT MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,750,000) made up as follows:

Fair Market Value S.S. Keewatin With Museum Ship Premium $ Fair Market Value Hull & Structure 38,750,000 Fair Market Value Machinery, Equipment & and Related Assets 5,030,000 Fair Market Value Ship 43,780,000 Museum Ship Premium 10% 4,378,000 Fair Market Value Museum 48,158,000 Fair Market Value Displays & Accessories 315,000 Agragate Fair Market Vlue 48,473,000 Agragate Fair Market Vlue - Rounded 48,475,000

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 24

DOCUMENTS USED 1. Book: “Keewatin 1907 – Last of the Classic Great Lakes Passenger Steamships (Maritime Museum, Saugatuck-Douglas, Michigan 2. Book: “S.S. Keewatin 1907, Port McNicoll, Ontario, Canada – the Last Edwardian Passenger Steamship in the World!, The Great Lakes Queen by Kim Patricia Vaillancourt” 3. Book: “The Story of the S.S. Keewatin (Revised Edition) – Cindy and Bob Zimmerman 4. Flyer – S.S. Keewatin – A Truly Great Canadian Treasure Telling A Story of Canada’s Completion of Confederation 5. Canadian Heritage Booklet: “Certification of Cultural Property for Income Tax Purposes by the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board – Application Guide and Supplementary Information – May 2015” 6. Canadian Heritage Article: “Outstanding Significance and National Importance (OS/NI) – Writing and Effective OS/NI Justification for the Certification of Cultural Property by the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board – December 2013 7. Trillium ferry gets tuned up after 107 years spent on Toronto’s waterfront / Toronto Star – 2017-06-19 8. Marine Engines – Artifacts & Shipwrecks – New Jersey Scuba Diving – Http://njscuba.net/artifacts/obj_engine.php - 1/8/2018 9. SS Delphine (1921) – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Delphine_(1921) – 1/5/2018 10. Work to Restore Long Beach’s Queen Mary to Glory Labor of Love For Man In Charge by Harry Saltzgaver, Executive Editor, News – August 8, 2017– Home / News – http://gazettes.com/news/work-to-restore-long-beach-s-queen-mary-to-glory/article - 9/30/2017 11. Cruise Ship Orderbook - Cruise Industry News – 12/17/2017 12. National Post Photo gallery: Aboard the 105-year-old steamship S.S. Keewatin … - http://nationalpost.com/photos/photo-gallery-aboard-the-105-yea... 8/16/2017 13. CBC News article, “Cultural gem or ‘tax grab’? $20M in Annie Leibovitz photos caught in Canadian quandary by Richard Cuthbertson, Susan Allen, Jack Julian, CBC News Posted: Jul 12, 2017 14. Maritime History of the Great Lakes: Research Collections – http:/www.maritimehistoryofthegreatlakes.ca/Research.asp – 7/2/2017 15. DVD S.S. Keewatin Lighting & Bells Electric Plan – PDF Scans Apr 21-2017 – P&H Barrie Blue Printing 16. Environment Canada Parks Service – Canadian Parks Service – Classification System for Historical Collections 17. Leaflet – Pearl Seas Cruises – Great Lakes Cruises – Experience it with the Best – PearlSeasCruises.com

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 25

18. Category: 1907 Ships – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1907_ships – 8/16/2017 19. List of Museum Ships – Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_museum_ships - 5/16/2015 20. SS Keewatin - Wikipedia – http://shipbuildinghistory.com/canadayards/midland.htm - 10/17/2017 21. Midland Shipbuilding – http://shipbuildinghistory.com/canadayards/midland.htm 22. Article: “A Better Approach To Ship Valuations – Guggenheim Shipping…” – https://seekingalpha.com/article/4039482-better-approach-ship-val... 6/5/2017 23. MarineMoneyOffshore – H. Clarkson and Its Approach to Ship Valuation / Marine Mone… - https://www.marinemoneyoffshore.com/node/5803 - 6/5/2017 24. MarineMoneyOffshore article: “Ship Valuations: A Primer for the Puzzled” – https://www.marinemoneyoffshore.com/node/5877 - 6/5/2017 25. Compass Maritime Services / Harvard Business School Case Studies – “Compass Maritime has assisted the Harvard Business School on two cases regarding the valuation of ships.” – http://www.compassmar.com/Compass_Mar... – 2017-05-30 26. Weselmann Value Article: “Online Ship Value Indication – http://www.weselmannvalue.de/?gclid+CL2qwdGAmNQCFQg... – 5/30/2017 27. Eggar Forrester Shipbrokers article “Ship Valuations” – https://www.eggarforresterships.com/ship-valuations - 6/5/2017 28. Maritime Strategies International Article: “The Valuation of Ships Art and Science” by Roger Bartlett, Managing Director, Maritime Strategies International Asia Pte Ltd for Marine Money’s 6th Annual Korean Ship Finance Forum Busan – 1st November 2012 29. Article: “S.S. Keewatin” – http://sskeewatin.com – 3/1/2013 30. Results: Keewatin: Maritime History of the Great Lakes – http://images.maritimeshistoryofthegreatlakes.ca/results?q+keewatin... – 03-May-2016 31. RJ and Diane Peterson Great Lakes Foundation and Keewatin Museum Annual Financial Statements December 31, 2013 – Millard, DesLauriers & Shoemaker LLP 32. Article: “Keewatin thrives in its former home – The Commercial Record” – http://www.thecommercoa;recprd/cp,/keewatin-thrives-in-its-for... 6/6/2017 33. List of Artifacts Donated to the care of Huronia Museum by Friends of Keewatin in 2014 34. Pictures – Keewatin 35. Declaration of Authenticity

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 26

RESTRICTIONS AND QUALIFICATIONS This Valuation Report is issued subject to the following Restrictions and Qualifications: • CVS reserves the right, but is under no obligation, to revise this Valuation Report if any information, trends or changed conditions affecting our conclusions, that were in existence before the Valuation Date, become known to us after its issue; however, we have no responsibility to update our Valuation Report as a result of subsequent events. • This document is not intended for general circulation or publication; any use or reproduction of it for any purpose other than that stated is prohibited without our specific written permission, unless ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. • CVS hereby disclaims all liability to any party other than the Town, with such liability restricted to negligence on our part; in particular, we deny all responsibility or liability for any losses occasioned to the Town or any other party, resulting from unauthorized circulation, publication, reproduction or use of this Valuation Report. • Neither its authors nor CVS intend that this Valuation Report make any representations, nor be liable for any representations considered to be contained in it, expressed or implied, or for any omissions from it. • The analyses and research used in this Valuation Report were carried out by CVS and other professionals as independent and neutral experts; no party has put any restrictions on the scope of our work, opinions or conclusions. • CVS assumes that information and documents received from Skyline are complete, true and correct in all material respects. We did not conduct an Audit or Review of the financial affairs of the Ship. No external verification was obtained of the accuracy or completeness of any of the documents used. However, CVS carefully examined them, and, while we cannot express an opinion on them, we consider them to be reliable. • The preparation of a valuation is a complex process, involving analyses of diverse but interrelated data that must be regarded in their entirety. Therefore, CVS insists that the analyses and related conclusions expressed in this Valuation Report must be considered as a whole, and that it is not appropriate to select or extract any particular factor or portion from it without giving weight to all the components and analyses that went into its formulation; to do so would place undue emphasis on any particular aspect and could result in erroneous conclusions. A Letter of Representation with respect to the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied has been obtained from Skyline.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 27

BASIC ASSUMPTIONS This Estimate of Fair Market Value makes the following specific assumptions: • All information supplied by Skyline or the Ship is complete, true and correct. • Skyline has informed us of all significant factors, contracts or agreements relating to the Ship, in effect at the Valuation Date, that have a bearing on its value and they are reflected in this Valuation Report. • At the Valuation Date, no contracts or agreements were being negotiated that would have a material effect on the value of the Ship. • All required licenses, permits, consents, or other legislative or administrative authorizations from any government or private entity had been obtained by Skyline; they were in force at the Valuation Date, remain in force at the date of this Valuation Report, and will be kept current as required. • No material adverse changes have taken place in the operations of the Ship between the Valuation Date and the date of this Valuation Report. • There were no contracts, arrangements or agreements in force at the Valuation Date that would have any effect on the value of the Ship. • Considering the purpose of this Valuation Report, no investigation was necessary into potential economies of scale, cost savings or other synergies, that might be achieved by a sale of the Ship to a "special purchaser". Nor was any attempt made to identify any entity who might pay a premium to buy it for any particular reason. • All litigation, current, pending or threatened, if any, against the Ship has been disclosed to CVS.

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 28

CERTIFICATE I, James P. Catty, certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • The statements of fact contained in this Valuation Report are true and correct. • The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the indicated Assumptions, Restrictions and Qualifications and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. • I have no direct or indirect, present or prospective interest in Skyline or the Town; I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved and was subject to no limitations imposed by any party. • Our compensation is not contingent on any action or event resulting from analyses, opinions or conclusions in, or the use of this Valuation Report. • My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this Valuation Report has been prepared in conformity with, the Standards of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators and the US Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • I received significant professional assistance in preparing this Valuation Report from: Ian Cameron, Tom Roberts, Gilles Moss and Valerie Brown whose CVs are in Appendix 6 of Part II.

5 October 2018 Toronto, Canada Corporate Valuation Services Limited Per

James P. Catty, MA, ICVS, CPA•CA (Canada), CBV, CPA/ABV (US), CFA, CGMA, CFE President

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 29

Schedule A – Museum Ships

Country Launch Ship Type Argentina 1874 ARA Uruguay Corvette Argentina 1899 ARA Presidente Sarmiento Frigate Argentina 1934 Lehg II Ketch Argentina 1944 ARA Irigoyen Fleet Tug Australia 1948 Yelta Tugboat Australia 1962 Cape Don Lighthouse tender Australia 1864 City of Adelaide Clipper Australia 1867 May Queen Ketch Australia 1874 James Craig Barque Australia 1883 MV Nelcebee Auxiliary Schooner Australia 1885 Polly Woodside Barque Australia 1912 MV Lady Denman Ferry Australia 1917 Carpentaria Lightvessel Australia 1925 SS Forceful Tugboat Australia 1933 Wattle Tugboat Australia 1934 MV Krait Trawler Australia 1941 HMAS Castlemaine Corvette Australia 1941 HMAS Whyalla Minesweeper Australia 1944 HMAS Diamantina Frigate Australia 1945 Fearless Tugboat Australia 1956 HMAS Vampire Destroyer Australia 1966 HMAS Otway Submarine Australia 1967 HMAS Advance Patrol boat Australia 1967 HMAS Ovens Submarine Australia 1968 HMAS Onslow Submarine Australia 1973 HMAS Otama Submarine Australia 1981 HMAS Townsville Patrol boat Australia 1984 HMAS Gladstone Patrol boat Austria 1969 Niederösterreich Patrol Boat Belgium 1914 Amical Tugboat Belgium 1932 Mercator Barquentine Belgium 1959 Oudenaarde Minesweeper Belgium 1960 B-143 Submarine Brazil 1910 Laurindo Pitta Salvage tug Brazil 1943 Comandante Bauru Destroyer escort Brazil 1975 Riachuelo Submarine Bulgaria 1851 Radetzky Steamship Bulgaria 1907 Drazki Torpedo boat

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 30

Country Launch Ship Type Brazil 1910 Laurindo Pitta Salvage tug Brazil 1943 Comandante Bauru Destroyer escort Brazil 1975 Riachuelo Submarine Bulgaria 1851 Radetzky Steamship Bulgaria 1907 Drazki Torpedo boat Canada 1897 SS Keenora Steamboat Canada 1898 Moyie Sternwheeler Canada 1902 MS Normac Ferry Canada 1906 James Whalen Tugboat Canada 1907 SS Keewatin Passenger ship Canada 1913 CSS Acadia Hydrographic Research ship Canada 1914 SS Naramata Tugboat Canada 1914 SS Sicamous Sternwheeler Canada 1915 CCGS Bradbury Fisheries patrol vessel Canada 1922 SS Keno Sternwheeler Canada 1928 RCMPV St Roch Schooner Canada 1937 Radium King Tugboat Canada 1937 SS Klondike Sternwheeler Canada 1940 CCGS Ernest Lapointe Icebreaker Canada 1941 HMCS Sackville Corvette Canada 1942 Chickama II Passenger ship Canada 1942 HMCS Haida Destroyer Canada 1943 Ned Hanlan Tugboat Canada 1944 Lady Canadian Fishing vessel Canada 1946 SS Norisle Ferry Canada 1950 MS Norgoma Ferry Canada 1955 Peguis II Tugboat Canada 1958 CCGS Alexander Henry Icebreaker Canada 1963 Joe Simpson Freighter Canada 1964 HMCS Ojibwa Submarine Canada 1965 HMCS Onondaga Submarine Canada 1965 Persephone tugboat Canada 1966 RV Ben Franklin Submersible Canada 1968 HMCS Bras d'Or Hydrofoil Chile 1865 Huáscar Monitor warship Chile 1911 RAM Poderoso Tug Chile 1925 Contramaestre Micalvi Freighter Chile 1964 Fresia (PTF-81) Torpedo boat Chile 1972 O'Brien Submarine China 1913 SS Zhongshan Gunboat China 1940 Chi Lin (103) Destroyer

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 31

Country Launch Ship Type China 1941 Anshan Destroyer China 1944 USS LST-1008 Landing Ship, Tank China 1953 Sir Alexander Grantham Fireboat China 1954 Brasil Maru Passenger ship China 1962 Minghua Ocean liner China 1966 PLAN Nanchong 502 Frigate China 1970 Long March 1 (401) Nuclear submarine China 1971 PLAN Yintang 531 Frigate China 1972 Kiev Aircraft carrier China 1975 Minsk Aircraft carrier China 1975 PLAN Xiamen 515 Frigate Croatia 1894 Vridni Tugboat Croatia 1938 Galeb Presidential yacht Croatia 1944 Mališan (CB 20) Midget submarine Cuba 1943 Granma Cabin cruiser Denmark 1860 Jylland Screw frigate Denmark 1895 Gedser Rev (XVII) Lightvessel Denmark 1941 Askø Minesweeper Denmark 1963 HDMS Springeren (S324) Submarine Denmark 1965 HDMS Peder Skram Frigate Denmark 1965 HDMS Sælen Submarine Denmark 1965 HDMS Søbjørnen Motor Torpedo Boat Denmark 1977 HDMS Sehested (P547) Fast Attack Craft Ecuador 1884 BAE Abdón Calderón Naval ship Egypt 2500 BC Khufu ship Solar barge Estonia 1914 Suur Tõll Icebreaker Estonia 1936 EML Lembit Submarine Estonia 1943 EML Valvas Buoy tender Estonia 1956 Admiral Steamship Estonia 1956 EML Suurop Patrol boat Estonia 1966 EML Kalev Minesweeper Estonia 1966 PVL Torm Patrol boat Estonia 1976 EML Grif Patrol boat Finland 1874 Salama Steamship Finland 1887 Sigyn Barque Finland 1902 Suomen Joutsen Full rigged ship Finland 1903 Pommern Barque Finland 1907 Tarmo Icebreaker Finland 1915 Wilhelm Carpelan Transport boat Finland 1933 Vesikko Submarine Finland 1935 VMV-11 Patrol boat

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 32

Country Launch Ship Type Finland 1943 Tyrsky Torpedo boat Finland 1957 Keihässalmi Minelayer Finland 1960 MS Bore Cruise ship Finland 1968 FNS Karjala Corvette France 1901 Duchesse Anne Full rigged ship France 1904 Alose Submarine France 1927 Princess Elizabeth Paddle steamer France 1944 ST-488 Small harbor tug France 1953 FNRS III Bathyscaphe France 1956 Colbert Guided missile cruiser France 1957 Argonaute Submarine France 1957 Maillé-Brézé (D627) Destroyer France 1958 France I Weather ship France 1960 Espadon (S637) Submarine France 1962 Joshua Ketch France 1964 Flore Submarine France 1965 Entreprenant Tugboat France 1971 Redoutable Submarine Germany 1850 Brandtaucher Submarine Germany 1888 Elbe 3 Lightvessel Germany 1896 Rickmer Rickmers Barque Germany 1906 SM U-1 Submarine Germany 1908 Bürgermeister Abendroth (Elbe 3) Lightvessel Germany 1911 Passat Barque Germany 1911 Peking Barque Germany 1927 Deutschland Full rigged ship Germany 1933 Gorch Fock Barque Germany 1933 Stettin Icebreaker Germany 1933 Stralsund Train ferry Germany 1939 Rau IX Whaler Germany 1943 U-995 Submarine Germany 1945 Wilhelm Bauer (U-2540) Submarine Germany 1951 Charlesville Ocean Liner Germany 1957 Frieden Cargo ship Germany 1958 MS Bleichen Freighter Germany 1958 Weilheim M1077 Minesweeper Germany 1959 Kranich P6083 Fast Attack Craft Germany 1961 MS Cap San Diego Freighter Germany 1962 K-24 Submarine Germany 1962 U-461 Submarine Germany 1964 Stubnitz Factory ship Germany 1967 Mölders Guided missile destroyer

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 33

Country Launch Ship Type Germany 1967 U-10 Submarine Germany 1967 U-9 Submarine Germany 1968 U-11 Submarine Germany 1973 HMS Otus Submarine Germany 1976 B-515 Submarine Germany 1986 Hans Beimler Missile Corvette Greece 1908 Thalis o Milisios Cable layer Greece 1910 Georgios Averof Armored cruiser Greece 1942 HNS Velos Destroyer Greece 1943 SS Hellas Liberty Cargo ship Hungary 1871 SMS Leitha Monitor Iceland 1955 Magni Tugboat Iceland 1959 ICGV Óðinn Offshore patrol vessel India 1961 INS Vikrabt Aircraft Carrier India 1969 INS Kunsura Submarine India 1974 INS Vagli Submarine India 1976 INS Chamak Missile boat India 1976 INS Chapal Missile boat India 1977 INS Chatak Missile boat Indonesia 1952 KRI Pasopati (410) Submarine Israel 1942 INS Af Al Pi Chen Landing craft tank Israel 1967 INS Mivtach Missile boat Israel 1970 INS Dabur Patrol boat Israel 1975 INS Gal Submarine Italy 1895 Pietro Micca Tugboat Italy 1898 Puglia Protected cruiser Italy 1916 MAS-15 Torpedo boat Italy 1916 MAS-96 Torpedo boat Italy 1921 Ebe Barquentine Italy 1967 Enrico Dandolo (S513) Submarine Italy 1968 Enrico Toti (S506) Submarine Italy 1976 Nazario Sauro (S 518) Submarine Japan 1900 Mikasa Pre-dreadnought Japan 1929 Hikawa Maru Ocean Liner Japan 1930 Kaiwo Maru Sail Training ship Japan 1930 Nippon Maru Sail Training ship Japan 1938 Sōya Icebreaker Japan 1985 Akishio Submarine Malaysia 1967 KD Rahmat Frigate Malaysia 1978 Ouessant (S623) Submarine

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 34

Country Launch Ship Type Montenegro 1967 Heroj (P-821) Submarine Montenegro 1986 Una (P-912) Midget submarine Myanmar 1942 UBS Mayu Frigate Netherlands 1868 HNLMS Buffel Ram Netherlands 1868 HNLMS Schorpioen Ram ship Netherlands 1877 HNLMS Bonaire Frigate Netherlands 1900 Christiaan Brunings Icebreaker Netherlands 1933 HMS Elfin Torpedo recovery vessel Netherlands 1936 HNLMS Abraham Crijnssen Minesweeper Netherlands 1939 Hudson Tugboat Netherlands 1950 MLV Castor Pilot vessel Netherlands 1951 Holland Tugboat Netherlands 1953 HNLMS Mercuur Minesweeper Netherlands 1953 Le Fougueux P641 Submarine chaser Netherlands 1954 Bernisse (AMS 60) Minesweeper Netherlands 1957 B-80 Submarine Netherlands 1958 SS Rotterdam Ocean Liner Netherlands 1959 Elbe Oceangoing tug Netherlands 1965 HNLMS Tonijn Submarine Netherlands 1974 HNLMS De Ruyter Frigate Netherlands 148 De Meern 1 Barge New Zealand 1853 Edwin Fox Barque New Zealand 1925 Rapaki Crane vessel North Korea 1944 USS Pueblo Technical research ship Norway 1866 SS Bjoren Steamboat Norway 1872 Gjøa Sloop Norway 1873 HNoMS Rap Torpedo boat Norway 1892 Fram Research ship Norway 1911 DS Hestmanden Cargo ship Norway 1937 MV Heland (M5V) Fishing boat Norway 1939 MV Vita (H95B) Shetland bus Norway 1942 HNoMS Hitra Submarine chaser Norway 1950 Southern Actor Whale catcher Norway 1953 HNoMS Alta Minesweeper Norway 1956 MS Finnmarken Coastal trading vessel Norway 1965 HNoMS Narvik Frigate Norway 1965 HnoMS Utstein Submarine Norway 1965 HNoMS Blink Patrol boat Norway 1965 KNM Skrei Motor torpedo boat Pakistan 1956 PNS Mujahid Coastal minesweeper Pakistan 1968 PNS Hangor Submarine Paraguay 1931 ARP Humaitá Gunboat

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 35

Country Launch Ship Type Peru 1861 Yavari Steamship Peru 1904 BAP America Gunboat Peru 1954 BAP Abtao Submarine Poland 1909 Dar Pomorza Full rigged ship Poland 1932 ORP Batory Patrol boat Poland 1936 ORP Błyskawica Destroyer Poland 1949 SS Soldek Freighter Poland 1965 ORP Fala Patrol craft Portugal 1778 Bergantim Real Barge Portugal 1843 Dom Fernando II e Glória Frigate Portugal 1955 Gil Eannes Hospital ship Portugal 1967 NRP Albacora Submarine Portugal 1968 NRP Barracuda Submarine Russia 1900 Angara Icebreaker Russia 1900 Aurora Protected cruiser Russia 1917 Krasin Icebreaker Russia 1929 Narodovolets (D-2) Submarine Russia 1938 K-21 Submarine Russia 1939 Vityaz Research vessel Russia 1952 Mikhail Kutuzov Cruiser Russia 1954 S-189 Submarine Russia 1952 M-261 Submarine Russia 1957 Lenin Icebreaker Russia 1968 B-413 Submarine Russia 1968 Kosmonavt Viktor Patsayev Research Vessel Russia 1971 B-440 Submarine Russia 1977 B-307 Submarine Russia 1980 B-396 Submarine Serbia 1985 Tisa (P-911) Midget submarine Slovenia 1987 Zeta (P-913) Midget submarine South Africa 1927 Ulundi Steam tug South Africa 1941 SAS Somerset Boom defense vessel South Africa 1957 SAS Durban Minesweeper South Africa 1961 J.R. More Steam tug South Africa 1972 SAS Assegaai Submarine South Korea 1943 ROKS Taedong Frigate South Korea 1944 ROKS Suyeong Landing Ship, Tank South Korea 1944 Wi Bong Landing Ship, Tank South Korea 1945 ROKS Hwa San Landing Ship, Tank South Korea 1945 ROKS Jeong Buk Destroyer South Korea 1945 ROKS Kang Won Destroyer

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 36

Country Launch Ship Type South Korea 1980 ROKS Ulsan Frigate South Korea 1982 ROKS Dolgorae (SSM-051) Submarine South Korea 1984 ROKS Seoul Frigate South Korea 1989 ROKS Cheonan Corvette South Korea 1991 Sang-O class submarine Submarine South Korea 1970s ROKS PKM-285 Patrol boat South Korea 1970s ROKS PKM-357 Patrol boat Spain 1887 Peral Submarine Spain 1912 SS La Palma Steamship Spain 1957 Tiburón-I SA-51 Submarine Spain 1957 Tiburón-II SA-52 Submarine Spain 1973 Delfin (S-61) Submarine Suriname 1910 Suriname-Rivier Lightvessel Sweden 1628 Vasa Galleon Sweden 1875 Sölve Monitor Sweden 1888 af Chapman Full rigged ship Sweden 1897 HMS Najaden Full rigged ship Sweden 1900 Jarramas Tall ship Sweden 1903 Finngrundet Lightvessel Sweden 1904 Hajen Submarine Sweden 1908 Stormprincess Tugboat Sweden 1915 Fladen Lightvessel Sweden 1915 SS Sankt Erik Icebreaker Sweden 1920 ESAB IV Repair ship Sweden 1929 SS Orion Pilot ship Sweden 1931 Flodsprutan II Fireboat Sweden 1938 Fryken Coastal trading vessel Sweden 1939 Herkules Tugboat Sweden 1940 HMS Bremön (M55) Minesweeper Sweden 1942 HMS U3 Submarine Sweden 1953 HSwMS Kalmarsund Minelayer Sweden 1956 HMS Småland Destroyer Sweden 1962 HSwMS Nordkaparen Submarine Sweden 1963 Dan Broström Port ferry Sweden 1966 HMS Spica Torpedo boat Sweden 1978 HSwMS Hugin Patrol boat Switzerland 1964 Auguste Piccard Submarine Taiwan 1945 ROCS Te Yang Destroyer Thailand 1936 HTMS Maeklong Corvette Thailand 1943 HTMS Prasae Frigate Thailand 1943 HTMS Tachin Frigate

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 37

Country Launch Ship Type Turkey 1915 Nusret Minelayer Turkey 1944 TCG Uluçalireis Submarine Turkey 1946 TCG Gayret Destroyer Turkey 1951 TCG Pirireis Submarine Turkey 1972 TCG Ege Frigate Ukraine 1950s M-305 Submarine United Kingdom 1509 Mary Rose Carrack United Kingdom 1765 HMS Victory Ship of the line United Kingdom 1817 HMS Trincomalee Frigate United Kingdom 1824 HMS Unicorn Frigate United Kingdom 1843 SS Great Britain Steamship United Kingdom 1860 HMS Warrior Armored Frigate United Kingdom 1861 Mayflower tugboat United Kingdom 1869 Cutty Sark Clipper United Kingdom 1872 Glenlee Barque United Kingdom 1878 HMS Gannet Sloop United Kingdom 1890 SS Robin Coastal trading vessel United Kingdom 1894 RNLB Alfred Corry (ON 353) Lifeboat United Kingdom 1894 Turbinia Steamship United Kingdom 1901 HMS Holland 1 Submarine United Kingdom 1901 Reaper Fifie United Kingdom 1901 RRS Discovery Barque United Kingdom 1903 Daniel Adamson Tender United Kingdom 1903 Garlandstone Ketch United Kingdom 1909 Olga Pilot Cutter United Kingdom 1910 Arctic Penguin Lightvessel United Kingdom 1911 SS Nomadic Tender United Kingdom 1912 James Caird Whaleboat United Kingdom 1912 Sundowner Motor yacht United Kingdom 1914 Calshot Spit (LV78) Lightvessel United Kingdom 1914 HMS Caroline Cruiser United Kingdom 1915 HMS M33 Monitor United Kingdom 1916 HM CMB 4 Coastal Motor Boat United Kingdom 1917 De Wadden Schooner United Kingdom 1918 HMS President Sloop United Kingdom 1924 Knocker White Tugboat United Kingdom 1924 PS Medway Queen Steamship United Kingdom 1927 Portway Tugboat United Kingdom 1927 Spurn Lightship Lightvessel United Kingdom 1929 TSS T/T Calshot Tug tender

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 38

Country Launch Ship Type United Kingdom 1914 HMS Caroline Cruiser United Kingdom 1915 HMS M33 Monitor United Kingdom 1916 HM CMB 4 Coastal Motor Boat United Kingdom 1917 De Wadden Schooner United Kingdom 1918 HMS President Sloop United Kingdom 1924 Knocker White Tugboat United Kingdom 1924 PS Medway Queen Steamship United Kingdom 1927 Portway Tugboat United Kingdom 1927 Spurn Lightship Lightvessel United Kingdom 1929 TSS T/T Calshot Tug tender United Kingdom 1930 Lydia Eva Drifter United Kingdom 1931 John H Amos tugboat United Kingdom 1933 RNLB Thomas McCunn Lifeboat United Kingdom 1933 TS Queen Mary Clyde steamer United Kingdom 1934 PS Wingfield Castle Paddle steamer United Kingdom 1934 Pyronaut Fireboat United Kingdom 1935 John King tugboat United Kingdom 1935 Massey Shaw Fireboat United Kingdom 1937 Helwick LV91 Lightvessel United Kingdom 1937 Tamzine Fishing boat United Kingdom 1938 HMS Belfast Light cruiser United Kingdom 1939 RNLB Jesse Lumb Lifeboat United Kingdom 1940 RNLB Lucy Lavers Lifeboat United Kingdom 1942 Spartan Clyde puffer United Kingdom 1942 U-534 Submarine United Kingdom 1943 Auld Reekie Clyde puffer United Kingdom 1943 HMS Cavalier Destroyer United Kingdom 1943 HMS Medusa (ML1387) Patrol boat United Kingdom 1943 S-130 Fast attack craft United Kingdom 1944 Biber 105 Submarine United Kingdom 1944 Biber 90 Submarine United Kingdom 1944 HMS X24 Submarine United Kingdom 1944 Vital Spark Clyde puffer United Kingdom 1945 Cervia Tug United Kingdom 1945 HMS Expunger (XE8) Submarine United Kingdom 1945 HMS LCT (3) 7074 Landing craft tank United Kingdom 1945 HMS Alliance Submarine United Kingdom 1946 VIC 56 Clyde Puffer United Kingdom 1951 HMS Bronington Minesweeper

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 39

Country Launch Ship Type United Kingdom 1952 MB Fountain Bunkering vessel United Kingdom 1952 HMS Gay Archer Patrol boat United Kingdom 1952 USN P22 Patrol boat United Kingdom 1953 Edmund Gardner Pilot boat United Kingdom 1953 HMY Britannia Royal Yacht United Kingdom 1953 PS Maid of the Loch Paddle steamer United Kingdom 1954 Canning Tug United Kingdom 1954 HMS Stickleback (X51) Submarine United Kingdom 1955 Shieldhall Steamship United Kingdom 1955 SS Explorer Research vessel United Kingdom 1956 Garnock Tugboat United Kingdom 1957 Ross Tiger Fishing trawler United Kingdom 1960 Arctic Corsair Trawler United Kingdom 1962 Gipsy Moth IV Yacht United Kingdom 1962 HMS Ocelot Submarine United Kingdom 1963 LV21 Lightvessel United Kingdom 1964 Brocklebank Tug United Kingdom 1966 B-49 Submarine United Kingdom 1970 HMS Courageous Submarine United Kingdom 1972 HMS Wilton Minesweeper United Kingdom 1972 Jacinta Trawler United Kingdom 1982 LR 3 Submersible United States 1776 USS Philadelphia Gunboat United States 1797 USS Constitution Frigate United States 1813 USS Niagara Snow-brig United States 1841 Charles W. Morgan Whaler United States 1854 USS Constellation Sloop United States 1861 Bayou St. John Submarine United States 1862 Australia Coasting schooner United States 1862 USS Cairo Gunboat United States 1863 H. L. Hunley Submarine United States 1863 Intelligent Whale Submarine United States 1863 Star of India Barque United States 1866 Emma C. Berry Sloop United States 1877 Elissa Barque United States 1878 Falls of Clyde Full rigged ship United States 1880 Annie Sandbagger sloop United States 1881 Fenian Ram Submarine United States 1882 Joseph Conrad Sailing ship United States 1883 Christeen Oyster sloop United States 1885 Coronet Yacht

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 40

Country Launch Ship Type United States 1885 Pioneer Schooner United States 1885 Wavertree Full-rigged ship United States 1886 Balclutha Full rigged ship United States 1888 Priscilla Sloop United States 1889 Arthur Foss Tugboat United States 1890 Eureka Paddle Steamer United States 1891 Alma Schooner United States 1891 Nellie Oyster sloop United States 1892 Kestrel Steam yacht United States 1892 USS Olympia Protected cruiser United States 1893 Lettie G. Howard Schooner United States 1894 Effie M. Morrissey Schooner United States 1895 C.A. Thayer Schooner United States 1896 SS Meteor Steamer United States 1898 Berkeley Ferryboat United States 1900 Edward M. Cotter Fireboat United States 1900 Regina M. Carry-away sloop United States 1901 Gazela Primeiro Barkentine United States 1901 Urger Canal tugboat United States 1902 Jupiter Tugboat United States 1904 Barnegat (LV 79/WAL 506) Lightvessel United States 1904 Medea Steam yacht United States 1904 Swiftsure Lightvessel United States 1905 Milwaukee Clipper Passenger Steamer United States 1906 Baltimore Tugboat United States 1906 Ticonderoga Steamboat United States 1907 Ambrose Lightvessel United States 1907 Hercules Tugboat United States 1908 Sabino Ferry United States 1909 Duwamish Fireboat United States 1910 Sand Man Tugboat United States 1910 USS Texas Battleship United States 1911 Col. James M. Schoonmaker Bulk freighter United States 1914 Eppleton Hall Tugboat United States 1914 Libby's No. 23 Sailboat United States 1914 Pilot Pilot boat United States 1914 SS Lehigh Valley 79 Railroad car float United States 1915 Portsmouth (LV101) Lightvessel United States 1915 USS Arizona Battleship United States 1917 SS Valley Camp Bulk freighter United States 1918 W. P. Snyder Jr. Towboat

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 41

Country Launch Ship Type United States 1919 John Purves Tugboat United States 1920 Huron Lightvessel United States 1921 Day Peckinpaugh Canal motorship United States 1921 L. A. Dunton Schooner United States 1923 Majestic Showboat United States 1923 Modesty Sloop United States 1925 Montgomery Snagboat United States 1925 Ralph J. Scott Fireboat United States 1925 SS William G. Mather Bulk freighter United States 1926 Florence Western-rig dragger United States 1927 Derrick Boat No. 8 Floating derrick United States 1927 George M. Verity Towboat United States 1927 USCGC Alert USCG patrol boat United States 1927 USCGC McLane Patrol Boat United States 1928 Gerda III Lighthouse tender United States 1928 Katherine V Fish tug United States 1929 Fireboat No. 1 Fireboat United States 1929 Frying Pan Lightvessel United States 1929 WT Preston Dredger United States 1930 Chesapeake (LV116) Lightvessel United States 1930 Hope Fish tug United States 1930 W. O. Decker Tugboat United States 1931 Captain Meriwether Lewis Dredger United States 1931 City of Milwaukee Railroad Car Ferry United States 1931 John J. Harvey Fireboat United States 1932 Brilliant Auxiliary schooner United States 1932 Sergeant Floyd Towboat United States 1932 Victura Sailboat United States 1933 Nenana Sternwheeler United States 1933 USCGC Lilac Lighthouse tender United States 1934 RMS Queen Mary Ocean Liner United States 1934 USCGC Comanche Cutter United States 1934 USS Potomac Yacht United States 1934 William M. Black Dredger United States 1935 USCGC Taney Cutter United States 1936 Nantucket (LV-112) Lightvessel United States 1936 USCGC Ingham Cutter United States 1937 Kingston II Harbor tug United States 1938 Chancellor Tugboat United States 1938 Fire Fighter Fireboat United States 1938 Mary A. Whalen Oil tanker

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 42

Country Launch Ship Type United States 1938 Overfalls Lightvessel United States 1938 SS William A. Irvin Lake freighter United States 1940 Hoga District harbor tug United States 1940 USS North Carolina Battleship United States 1941 HA. 19 Midget submarine United States 1941 HA. 8 Midget submarine United States 1941 PT 48 PT Boat United States 1941 U-505 Submarine United States 1941 USS Drum Submarine United States 1941 USS Massachusetts Battleship United States 1941 USS Silversides Submarine United States 1942 Sherman Zwicker Schooner United States 1942 SS John W. Brown Cargo ship United States 1942 USCGC Sundew USCG Seagoing Buoy Tender United States 1942 USS LST-325 Landing Ship, Tank United States 1942 USS LST-393 Landing Ship, Tank United States 1942 USS Alabama Battleship United States 1942 USS Iowa Battleship United States 1942 USS Lexington Aircraft carrier United States 1942 USS New Jersey Battleship United States 1942 USS Stewart Destroyer escort United States 1943 Ludington Tugboat United States 1943 Major Elisha K. Henson Tugboat United States 1943 PT 305 PT Boat United States 1943 PT 309 PT Boat United States 1943 PT 459 PT Boat United States 1943 PT 486 PT Boat United States 1943 SS Jeremiah O'Brien Cargo ship United States 1943 USCGC Bramble Cutter/Buoy tender United States 1943 USCGC Mackinaw Icebreaker United States 1943 USS Batfish Submarine United States 1943 USS Bowfin Submarine United States 1943 USS Cassin Young Destroyer United States 1943 USS Cavalla Submarine United States 1943 USS Cobia Submarine United States 1943 USS Cod Submarine United States 1943 USS Croaker Submarine United States 1943 USS Hornet Aircraft carrier United States 1943 USS Intrepid Aircraft carrier United States 1943 USS Kidd Destroyer

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 43

Country Launch Ship Type United States 1943 USS Laffey Destroyer United States 1943 USS Ling Submarine United States 1943 USS Lionfish Submarine United States 1943 USS Little Rock Light cruiser United States 1943 USS Pampanito Submarine United States 1943 USS Salem Heavy cruiser United States 1943 USS The Sullivans Destroyer United States 1943 USS Wisconsin Battleship United States 1943 USS Yorktown Aircraft carrier United States 1944 Angels Gate Tugboat United States 1944 HA. 62-76 Midget submarine United States 1944 SS Red Oak Victory Victory ship United States 1944 USCGC Comanche Fleet tug United States 1944 USCGC Acacia USCG seagoing buoy tender United States 1944 USS Inaugural Minesweeper United States 1944 USS LCI(L)-1091 Landing Craft Infantry United States 1944 USS LCI(L)-713 Landing Craft Infantry United States 1944 USS LCS(L)(3)-102 Landing Craft Support United States 1944 USS Becuna Submarine United States 1944 USS Hazard Minesweeper United States 1944 USS Missouri Battleship United States 1944 USS Razorback Submarine United States 1944 USS Slater Destroyer escort United States 1944 USS Torsk Submarine United States 1945 PT 615 PT Boat United States 1945 PT 617 PT Boat United States 1945 PT 658 PT Boat United States 1945 PT 728 PT boat United States 1945 PT 796 PT Boat United States 1945 SS American Victory Cargo ship United States 1945 SS Lane Victory Cargo ship United States 1945 USS Clamagore Submarine United States 1945 USS Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Destroyer United States 1945 USS Midway Aircraft carrier United States 1945 USS Orleck Destroyer United States 1945 USS Requin Submarine United States 1946 CG 36500 Lifeboat United States 1946 MV Abegweit Icebreaking ferry United States 1947 Portland Steam tug United States 1947 Roann Eastern-rig dragger

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 44

Country Launch Ship Type United States 1950 Nantucket (WLV-612) Lightvessel United States 1950 Relief Lightship United States 1950 Star Fishing vessel United States 1953 Trieste Bathyscaphe United States 1953 USS Lucid Minesweeper United States 1953 USS Albacore Submarine United States 1953 USS Marlin Submarine United States 1954 John D. McKean Fireboat United States 1954 USS Nautilus Submarine United States 1955 SS X-1 Submarine United States 1955 USS Barry Destroyer United States 1958 USS Edson Destroyer United States 1958 USS Growler Submarine United States 1958 USS Turner Joy Destroyer United States 1959 NS Savannah Nuclear merchant ship United States 1959 USS Blueback Submarine United States 1961 PCF-104 Patrol Craft Fast United States 1962 PTF 3 Fast patrol boat United States 1964 Aluminaut Submarine United States 1965 K-77 Submarine United States 1965 PCF-1 Patrol Craft Fast United States 1967 B-39 Submarine United States 1968 Baylander (IX-514) Helicopter Landing Trainer United States 1968 CCB-18 Command control boat United States 1968 PCF-816 Patrol Craft Fast United States 1968 PTF 17 Fast patrol boat United States 1968 PTF 26 Fast patrol boat United States 1968 RV Hero Research vessel United States 1968 USS Dolphin Submarine United States 1969 Clearwater Sloop United States 1969 Trieste II (DSV-1) Bathyscaphe United States 1971 B-427 Submarine United States 1977 CG 41410 United States 1981 USS Aries Hydrofoil United States 1984 Californian Schooner United States 1984 Hiddensee Missile Corvette United States 1987 Breck Marshall Catboat United States 1989 USCGC Mohawk Cutter

S.S. Keewatin Updated Valuation Report Page | 45

Protection to Persons & Property Committee March 13, 2019

Agenda

1. Call to Order:

2. Reports of Municipal Officials: 2.1 Report from the Fire Chief Report No. PPP-2019-21 Re: Fire Chief Monthly Report – February 2019 2.2 Report from the Deputy Fire Chief/FPO Report No. PPP-2019-18 Re: Deputy FC/FPO Monthly Activity Report – February 2019 2.3 Report from the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer Report No. PPP-2019-22 Re: By-law Monthly Activity Report – February 2019 2.4 Report from the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer Report No. PPP-2019-19 Re: Proposed Set Fines for the Parking By-law 2.5 Report from the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer Report No. PPP-2019-23 Re: MLEO/Canine Monthly Activity Report – February 2019 2.6 Report from the Clerk Report No. PPP-2019-25 Re: Business Licensing

3. Other Business: 3.1 Verbal Report from Councillor Warnock Re: Parking By-law & Driveways with Sidewalks 4. Items for Information: 4.1 Correspondence from the Portarama Committee Re: Request Exemption of By-law to Permit Fireworks Display

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Committee Agenda

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons and Property

Chair: Councillor Sandy Talbot

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-21

Report Title: Fire Chief Monthly Report – February 2019

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-21 regarding the Fire Chief’s Monthly Report – February 2019 be received for information;

The Chief Attended: 3 MVC Call 1 Medical Call

The new Pumper Truck for Hall 1 has arrived and should be put into service by March 6, 2019. The Tanker should be arriving around March 7, 2019 and it also is stationed in Hall 1.

The end of February was very busy for Tay Fire & Emergency Services. A large multi-vehicle accident on Hwy 400 and then a car versus transport accident on Hwy 12 were two of the more major calls of the month.

The ice water team has held two practices, one in January and one in February. The team has been working on transitioning their equipment over to the old rescue 1. The completion date is scheduled for March 11.

Recruitment: The third party training continues and is on schedule. We have had one recruit resign due to other time commitments.

Monthly Training: Staff recently completed training on our new digital radio system, and on identifying illegal drug labs and grow ops, and the safe work practices around them.

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-21

Tay Fire & Emergency Services were dispatched to 21 emergency calls during the month of January.

Year to Date Totals:

2019 45 2018 45 2017 47 2016 38 2015 39

Year in Review: Here is a partial breakdown of calls dispatched:

Call Type Month YTD Fire 2 7 Medical 6 10 Motor Vehicle Collision 3 9 False Alarms 4 9 Carbon Monoxide 0 2 Hazardous Material 2 3

By-law By-law staff are working their Chairperson and Deputy Mayor on two recently deferred by-laws.

We are continuing with our prosecution of the medical marijuana establishment, as well as a number of property standards non-compliance issues.

Canine Control Staff are busy inputting the information for all the recently purchase dog license information.

Prepared By: Brian Thomas, Fire Chief/CEMC

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Protection to Persons & Property 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-21

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons and Property Committee

Chair: Councillor Sandy Talbot

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-18

Report Title: Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Prevention Officer Monthly Activity Report – February 2019

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-18 regarding Deputy Fire Chief/FPO Monthly Activity report – February be received for information.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: This YTD YTD YTD Activity Month 2019 2018 2017 Routine Inspections 2 5 6 6 Request Inspections 0 1 1 3 Complaint Inspections 2 3 2 1 Information Inspection 0 0 3 1 Follow up Inspections 4 8 11 9 Courses Attended 0 3 2 2 Fire Calls Attended 8 16 21 11 Meetings(PIP/OP-co-op etc) 7 13 14 10 Orders issued 2 2 4 1 Immediate threat to life 0 0 0 0 Burning Complaint(s) 0 0 0 0 Training Presented 1 2 3 3 Pub Ed Performed 0 0 1 0 Hall Meetings 4 5 8 10 Hall Practices 0 1 0 0 Council 1 1 1 1 Misc. (dept related) 9 17 19 13 Court 0 0 0 0 Fire safety plans reviewed 4 9 11 7 TOTAL 44 86 107 78

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-18

TICKETS ISSUED

Ticket Quantity Total PART I 0 0 PART II 0 0 PART III 0 0 TOTAL 0 0

Prepared By: Shawn Aymer, Deputy Fire Chief/ Fire Prevention Officer

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Brian Thomas Fire Chief

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Protection to Persons & Property 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-18

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons and Property Committee

Chair: Councillor Sandy Talbot

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-22

Report Title: By-law Monthly Activity Report – February 2019

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-22 regarding By-law Monthly Activity Report – February 2019 be received for information.

COMPLAINT OVERVIEW – February 2019

By-Law Opened Closed Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Files Files 2017 2018 2019 Clean Yards 0 0 5 10 0 Dogs 7 2 0 0 7 DOLA 0 0 0 0 0 Long Grass 0 0 0 0 0 Noise 1 0 0 0 1 Property 0 1 2 12 0 Standards Zoning 0 0 0 6 0 Tay Shore Trail- 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Burning 1 0 0 0 1 House Numbering 14 7 0 0 35 Heavy Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 Parks 0 0 0 0 0 Building 0 0 0 1 0 Encroachment 0 0 0 1 0 Snow Removal 11 10 0 0 1

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-22

Total files Total files Total Files

opened YTD closed YTD Outstanding

77 36 82

This month staff continued to focus on house numbering within the Waubaushene area, which resulted in 14 houses being sent letters to advise that they needed house numbers installed.

There were a few days of significant snowfall in February, and numerous complaints were received by staff regarding snow removal, which resulted in 11 letters being sent out to property owners advising them of the snow removal by-law. Most of those issues were due to owners depositing snow back out onto the roadway after the plough had already gone by the address.

As in past reports, most files from previous years remain open as they are in court for their matters.

Type of Actions Taken

Actions February 2019 Notice of Violation 33 Order to Comply 0 Charges 1 Notice of 0 Demo/Removal

PON/Tickets Issued

Type of Ticket Quantity By-law

Part 1 2 Burning Part 2 17 Parking Part 3 0

This month an individual was charged for burning materials not permitted and failure to obtain a fire permit which resulted in the two charges stated above.

Previous Month’s Tickets Paid

There were 17 tickets issued in January that were not paid by the end of that month. In February a total of 9 tickets written in January were paid with the remaining 8 unpaid tickets being sent a Notice of Impending Conviction.

Protection to Persons & Property 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-22

None have responded to the notice and all unpaid tickets will be sent to the court office if still not paid after the second due date.

Tickets Written - February 2019

Type of Parking Ticket Tickets Paid No Payment written Park with vehicle facing 1 1 0 wrong direction Park on 4 0 4 Boulevard/Sidewalk Park in Prohibited Area 2 2 0 Park within 3 metres of 0 0 0 fire hydrant Park on Municipal 1 1 0 Property Without Permission Park on roadway/ within 5 1 4 3.05m of roadway Interfere with snow 2 2 0 removal Park in Fire Route 2 0 2 Park obstructing traffic 0 0 0

There were a total of 17 tickets written in the month of February, and as of March 1st, 9 of those tickets are unpaid. With the exception of a few days of very heavy snowfall, there were not a significant number of snow days during the month of February that required early morning staff patrols.

Additional Items/ Future Considerations

There was a court date on February 14th, 2019 which saw 6 matters that were dealt with:

- 1 Building Code matter was adjourned to June 6th, 2019 for trial - 2 Clean Yards matters, one was adjourned to April 11th, 2019 to be spoken to and the other adjourned to June 6th, 2019 for trial - 1 Property Standards matter where the defendant failed to appear and the matter was adjourned to June 6th, 2019 for an ex-parte trial - 1 Zoning matter, with relation to one of the Clean Yards matters, was also adjourned to April 11th, 2019 - 1 Dog at Large matter where the defendant pled guilty to 2 counts of permit dog to run at large and was given a $50.00 fine for each count.

Staff have received an increasing number of complaints with respect to nuisance lighting, for example a resident whose next-door neighbour

Protection to Persons & Property 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-22

installed a light that shines directly into their window. The Township does not currently have any by-law to regulate these types of complaints. This is a subject that may want to be discussed by Council, in order to determine how by-law staff should proceed in the future.

Staff will continue their review of existing and proposed new by-laws which will be brought forward for Council review in the coming months.

Prepared By: Rob Kennedy, Municipal Law Enforcement Officer

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Brian Thomas Fire Chief/CEMC

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Protection to Persons & Property 4 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-22

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons and Property

Chair: Councillor Sandy Talbot

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-19

Report Title: Proposed Set Fines for the Parking By-Law

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-19 regarding the Proposed Set Fines for the Parking By-Law;

And that Council provides comments on the proposed set fines to staff by 4:30pm March 22, 2019 so that staff may bring a final report forward to the March 27, 2019 Council meeting, with the required amendments to the by-law for approval.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The Township of Tay Municipal Law Enforcement Officer routinely checks all regulatory by-laws in order to keep current with changes in legislation and to update by-laws that are outdated.

ANALYSIS: A detailed review of the parking by-law was done over the past few months to be consistent with neighbouring municipalities and their set fine structures.

The following are changes that staff feel would be beneficial to have going forward and are looking for Council’s comments and direction on whether they are acceptable.

Protection to Persons and Property 1 March 13, 2019 PPP-2019-19

Increased parking fines

In comparison with municipalities in the surrounding area with a similar demographic and landscape, the set fines in Tay are considerably lower, as our current early payment for a majority of our offences is set at $20 with a set fine being $25. Our current fine structure and comparisons with other municipalities are highlighted in the chart below.

Municipality Set Fine – Set Winter Winter Set Fine Set Early Fine Parking Parking – Fine – Payment Set Fine – – Set Parking Parking Early Fine in Fire in Fire Payment Route – Route Early Payment Tay $20 $25 $25 $30 $50 $60 Oro-Medonte $40 $60 $80 $100 $100 $150 Tiny $50 $60 $50 $60 $75 $90

During the summer months several the marinas in the Township charge $20.00 for parking during the day. This fee is the same as our current set fine for a parking ticket, therefore staff does not feel that there is enough of a deterrent to parking illegally at the boat launch area. People are aware that our boat launch is one of the only free launches in this area so it is increasingly busy throughout the summer months and has become a main talking point and complaint that is received by staff once fishing season is open. Staff have encountered individuals who would prefer to pay the $20 fine to be able to park in that location. With higher fines it would be a better deterrent to parking illegally and hopefully decrease some of the congestion in the area during the summer.

During the winter parking restrictions when individuals leave their vehicles parked on the road it causes the plough to maneuver around them affecting proper snow clearing operations. This reduces the level of service on some roads, and creates numerous issues for the Public Works department, as the plough must return at another time to properly clear the road. Staff hopes that the increased fines will be a deterrent to violations of the winter parking restrictions.

With the amount of parking tickets issued increasing each year it shows that the parking by-law is increasingly being disregarded. In 2014 there were 69 tickets issued, in 2015 there were 73 written, 2017 had 79 tickets issued and then last year in 2018 there were 303 tickets written.

Staff recommends that the new fine structure be set at $40 for early payment and after 7 days the set fine will be $60 for the majority of the offences. The exceptions are parking within 3 metres of a fire hydrant which are $50 early payment and a set fine of $70, as well as parking in a fire

Protection to Persons and Property 2 March 13, 2019 PPP-2019-19 route which is now proposed an early payment of $100 with a set fine of $150.

Staff feel that with higher fines it creates more of a deterrent all around and will hopefully bring to light the importance of following parking by-laws within the Township.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A

CONCLUSION: This report includes proposed set fines for the Parking By-Law. Staff looks forward to the comments from Council.

Prepared By: Rob Kennedy, Municipal Law Enforcement Officer

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Brian Thomas Fire Chief

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Protection to Persons and Property 3 March 13, 2019 PPP-2019-19 STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons and Property Committee

Chair: Councillor Sandy Talbot

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-23

Report Title: MLEO/Canine Monthly Activity Report – February 2019

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-23 MLEO/Canine Monthly Activity Report – February 2019 be received for information.

MLEO/ Canine Activity Report

Activity Count Complaints and Investigations 30 Pound and Seizure 1 Dogs Returned to Owner or 2 Adopted DOLA Orders 0 Dog Tags Sold 470 Fines Issued 1 Files Opened 8 Files Closed 3 Approved Kennel Inspections 3

Tags by Year Tags Sold (YTD) Total 830 2019 Tags 617 2020 Tags 155 2021 Tags 58

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-23

Dog Attacks 2018 2019 (YTD) Dog on Dog 5 0 Dog on Human 2 0 DOLA Order Issued 3 0 Muzzle Orders Issued 1 0

There were a total of 470 dog tags sold in the month of February, including dog tags sold at the OSPCA. This brings the year to date total number of dog tags sold to 830. With the early fee for dog tags expiring, dog tag sales are expected to slow down. As in 2018, staff will create a list of dog owners who purchased a dog tag last year but did not renew this year.

In the month of February eight files were created regarding dogs not being licenced or dogs being at large. By-law staff was able to gain compliance and has since closed three files. All 2018 canine files have been closed.

Two dogs were found at large this month. One dog was dropped off by O.P.P and staff brought the dog to the Township pound keeper. The dog owner was located some time later and was reunited with their dog. Another dog was found to be at large on two separate occasions. The second time the dog was found at large the owner had received a charge for permitting dog to run at large after failing to adhere to staff recommendations.

Three kennel inspections took place in the month of February. All kennels were successful in passing their annual inspection.

Prepared By: Justin Rounds, MLEO/Canine Control

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Brian Thomas Fire Chief

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Protection to Persons & Property 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-23

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Protection to Persons & Property

Chair: Councillor Talbot

Meetingn Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PPP-2019-25

Report Title: Business Licensing

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PPP-2019-25 regaarding Business Licensing be received; and

That that the minor housekeeping amendments to the Business Licensing By-law be approved;

And that the required amendingn by-law be brought forward to the next Council meeting.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The current by-law, being By-law 2017-13 was adopted in early 2017 and relaxed many of the regulations impacting hawkers, peddlers and refreshment vehicle vendors within the Township. Businesses governed by this by-law are currently not permitted to opeerate on municipal lands without approval.

As part of the comprehensive review, upon receipt of regular inquiries as to what the Township’s regulations are, new business licensing provisions were introduced respecting farmers’ markets and salvage yards.

ANALYSIS:

Housekeeping Updates Having worked with the new by-law for a few years staff are proposing a few minor wording changes to make the interpretation of the by-law more consistent as follows:

Protection to Persons & Property 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-25

5.1 Every person who wishes to carry on business as a Farmers’ Market within the Township of Tay is requested to submit the necessary application form together with the application fee. Every person or business who wishes to carry on as a Farmers’ Market within the Township of Tay shall obtain a valid Farmers’ Market Licence.

7.2 Every person who wishes to carry on business as an Auctioneer within the Township of Tay shall obtain a valid Annual or Event Auctioneers Licence and receive zoning clearance prior to the license being issued. on a one-time basis is required to submit the necessary application form and obtain zoning clearance, together with the prescribed fee for an Auctioneers Event License as set out in the Township’s User Fees & Service Charges By-law.

There are no other proposed changes to the by-law or set fines at this time.

Vendors in Tay Parks Staff regularly receives inquiries as to whether or not the Township would licence a refreshment vehicle to operate in one of the Township’s gazebo parks or Patterson Park. Once a pavilion is constructed in MacKenzie Beach Park it is anticipated that the request will come forward for this park as well.

When the by-law was updated provisions were put in place whereby Council could authorize a vendor under agreement to operate on Township lands. Staff is seeking direction as to whether or not Council would be interested in pursuing this option. It is proposed that the Township would advertise for interested vendors and then the successful vendor would be required to enter into an agreement naming the Township as additional insured prior beginning operations. They would also still have to meet all regular licensing requirements such as health unit and fire department approvals.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact as a result of this report.

CONCLUSION: Staff is recommending that the housekeeping amendments be adopted, and that direction be provided with respect whether or not staff should proceed with a public process to allow for licensed vendors in Township parks.

Prepared By: Alison Gray, Clerk

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Alison Gray, BAH, CMO, AOMC Clerk

Protection to Persons & Property 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-25

Reviewed By:

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment: Business Licensing By-law 2017-13

Protection to Persons & Property 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. PPP-2019-25

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY

BY-LAW NO. 2017-13

Being a By-law to the Township of Tay to provide for the licensing, regulating and governing of certain businesses, trades or occupations carried on, or engaged in within the Township of Tay and to repeal By-law 2009-29

WHEREAS pursuant the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended a local municipality may licence, regulate and govern any business wholly or partly carried on within the municipality;

AND WHEREAS the Corporation of the Township of Tay deems it expedient to pass a by-law pursuant to the said section;

NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS;

1. DEFINITIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS BY-LAW 1.1 "AUCTION" means a sale in which bids on goods, articles, merchandise or effects are received by an Auctioneer and where each bid offers more than the last previous bid and where the goods, articles, merchandise or effect being put up for sale is sold to the highest bidder.

1.2 "AUCTIONEER" means any person selling or putting up for sale goods, wares, merchandise or effects by public auction and, without limiting the foregoing, may include livestock;

1.3 "COMPLAINANT" means a person who has filed a formal complaint under the provisions of this By-law.

1.4 “FARMERS MARKET” means a seasonal, multi-vendor organization selling agricultural products, food, art and craft products including homegrown produce, home-made crafts and value added products where the majority of vendors are primary producers (including preserves, baked goods, meat, dairy products, etc.)

1.5 “HAWKERS AND PEDDLERS” means any person or a motor vehicle, trailer, cart or stand, propelled, towed or driven by any kind of power, including muscular power, which who goes from property to property or to a particular location with the intent to sell goods, wares, merchandise or produce.

1.6 “REFRESHMENT VEHICLES” means a motor vehicle, trailer or cart, propelled, towed or driven by any kind of power, including muscular power, which is used for the storage, preparation or sale of food or drink intended for consumption by the public and which without limiting the generality thereof includes a coffee stand, hot dog cart, and chip truck.

1.7 “SALVAGE YARD/RECYCLING ESTABLISHMENT” shall include lands or premises whereon or wherein scrap metal, steel, plastic, lumber or other such substances or second-hand goods, are kept or stored or processed or fabricated or wrecked or sorted or cut or recycled, or anyone or more of the foregoing activities takes place, whether or not any of such goods or substances are made available for sale, or for other purposes, form the said lands or premises, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a salvage yard shall include a wrecking yard for automobiles, other vehicles or appliances, and a yard for the storage or sale of parts thereof. By-law 2017-13 Page 2

2. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 Every application for a licence shall be made in writing on the designated form and the required fee, as set out in the Township’s User Fees & Service Charges By-law, shall be paid at the time of application.

2.2 Any license issued shall be valid for the remainder of the calendar year in which said License is issued and shall expire on December 31st of that year. The applicable fee shall apply for a license issued throughout the year and shall not be pro-rated.

2.3 Subject to the applicant meeting the requirements set out in this by- law, the Clerk or designate shall issue the said licence.

2.4 Every licence issued in accordance with this by-law shall be displayed in a prominent place and be clearly visible to the public at all times.

2.5 All approvals must be received from each department and/or agency, as set out in this by-law, before a licence is issued.

2.6 No hawker or peddler, or refreshment vehicle shall operate in a Township park, or on a public road allowance or other public property within the Township, unless in conjunction with a Council authorized event or under agreement with the municipality. If permission is granted, the applicant shall provide proof of insurance in the amount of $2 million ($2,000,000) comprehensive liability insurance naming the Township has an additional insured prior to obtaining their licence.

3. LICENSING FOR HAWKERS AND PEDDLERS

3.1 No Hawker or Peddler shall operate with the Township of Tay without having first obtained a licence to do so.

3.2 The applicant for a Hawkers and Peddlers License shall submit the following: □ Completed application with required license fee □ If the applicant is not the owner of the property on which the business is to be located, proof of permission to operate on private property is required.

3.3 In addition to the items listed under section 3.2, prior to issuing the license the applicant must: □ Obtain zoning clearance □ If applicable, provide a site diagram/sketch, drawn to scale showing the location of the proposed hawker or peddler on the property including setbacks from the adjacent property lines, the proposed location of any parking, signage and garbage/recycling containers as well as entrances/exits where applicable. □ Provide a business outline of what goods and merchandise are to be sold

3.5 No person shall hawk or peddle any goods, wares or merchandise other than what is indicated on their license.

3.6 No person shall hawk or peddle any goods, wares or merchandise at a particular place other than the place indicated on the license.

3.7 A Hawkers and Peddlers License shall not be required by the following: (a) Persons/organizations who intend to sell goods, wares or merchandise “door-to-door” on behalf of a non-profit charitable organization or a non-profit non-charitable organization.

(b) Service clubs, registered charitable organizations or a person offering for sale goods or wares for the purpose of raising money for either a religious, charitable, philanthropic patriotic purpose. By-law 2017-13 Page 3

3.8 The Township of Tay reserves the right to restrict the number of licensed business regulated by this by-law.

3.9 Special Events - A Hawker and Peddler Licence shall not be required if the vendor is participating in a vendor/flea market/fair as part of a special event not lasting more than 72 hours or in conjunction with any Council approved special event. The organizers may be required, at the sole discretion of the Township, to produce a listing of all vendors approved to participate in the special event.

4. LICENSING FOR REFRESHMENT VEHICLES

4.1 No person shall operate or maintain a refreshment vehicle within the municipality without first having obtained a licence to do so.

4.2 The applicant for a Refreshment Vehicle License shall submit the following: □ Completed application with required license fee □ Proof of minimum $2 million ($2,000,000) liability insurance □ Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit approval (within last 6 months) □ Proof of Propane/Gas inspection by licensed installer (within last 6 months), if applicable □ If the applicant is not the owner of the property on which the business is to be located, proof of permission to operate on private property is required. □ Fuel fired appliances must meet current TSSA requirements □ Provide a business outline of what goods and merchandise are to be sold

4.3 In addition to the items listed under section 4.2, prior to issuing the license the applicant must: □ Pass Fire Inspection □ Obtain zoning clearance □ Provide a site diagram/sketch, drawn to scale showing the location of the proposed refreshment vehicle on the property including setbacks from the adjacent property lines, the proposed location of any parking, signage and garbage/recycling containers as well as entrances/exits where applicable.

4.4 If during the licensed period the applicant wishes to relocate the refreshment vehicle within the Township of Tay, a revised license may be issued provided that the requirements of Section 4.3 are met for the new location and the prescribed fee is submitted.

4.5 No person shall sell any items other than what is indicated on their license.

4.6 No Person shall fail to keep his Refreshment Vehicle in a clean and sanitary condition. In addition, such a vehicle shall be in good repair (i.e. no rust) and the exterior shall be clean and maintained.

4.7 The Operator of a Refreshment Vehicle shall be clean while serving the public from the vehicle.

4.8 No Person shall operate a Refreshment Vehicle drawn by animals.

4.9 No Person shall operate a Refreshment Vehicle which contains cooking, heating or cooling equipment unless the appropriate number and type of fire extinguisher are on board and are maintained in good operating condition.

By-law 2017-13 Page 4

4.10 No Person operating a Refreshment Vehicle shall activate bells, horns or music at a volume that disturbs the residents of the Township of Tay.

4.11 A Refreshment Vehicle License shall not be required by service clubs, registered charitable organizations or a person operating a Refreshment Vehicle for the purpose of raising money for either a religious, charitable, philanthropic patriotic purpose provided the fundraising event is less than 60 hours in duration.

4.12 The licensee shall take out a separate licence for each refreshment vehicle owned and operated by him/her.

4.13 The Township of Tay reserves the right to restrict the number of licensed business regulated by this by-law.

4.14 Special Events: Every person who wishes to carry on business as a Refreshment Vehicle within the Township of Tay as part of a special event not lasting more than 72 hours shall submit the following: □ Completed application with required temporary event license fee □ Proof of minimum $1 million ($1,000,000) liability insurance □ A letter, with site diagram, from the event organizer advising that the refreshment vehicle will be part of the organized event. □ Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit approval (within last 6 months) Proof of Propane/Gas inspection by licensed installer (within last 6 months), if applicable □ Proof of Propane/Gas inspection by licensed installer (within last 6 months), if applicable □ Fuel fired appliances must meet current TSSA requirements □ Pass Fire Inspection

5. LICENSING FOR FARMERS’ MARKETS

5.1 Every person who wishes to carry on business as a Farmers’ Market within the Township of Tay is requested to submit the necessary application form together with the application fee. Every person or business who wishes to carry on as a Farmers’ Market within the Township of Tay shall obtain a valid Farmers’ Market Licence.

5.2 The applicant for a Farmers’ Market License shall submit the following: □ Completed application with required license fee □ Proof of minimum $2 million ($2,000,000) liability insurance □ If the applicant is not the owner of the property on which the business is to be located, proof of permission to operate on private property is required. □ Obtain zoning clearance □ Provide a site diagram/sketch, drawn to scale showing the location of the market on the property including setbacks from the adjacent property lines, the proposed location of any parking, signage and garbage/recycling containers as well as entrances/exits where applicable.

5.3 An applicant applying for a Farmers’ Market, if located on Township property, must enter into a Farmers’ Market Agreement and provide all necessary documentation.

5.4 The number of licensed Farmers’ Markets located on municipal property is limited to one per settlement area per season.

5.5 The applicant shall ensure that all Farmers’ Market vendors are restricted to Simcoe County with the majority of producers of farm products primarily selling or offering for sale their own products. No By-law 2017-13 Page 5 vendors shall resell for products produced by others.

5.6 The applicant shall ensure that all certificates of approval that may be required from various agencies including the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit have been obtained from its vendors.

5.7 The applicant shall ensure that the Farmers’ Market is operated under the terms of the Farmers Markets of Ontario Rules and Regulations.

6. LICENSING FOR SALVAGE YARDS/RECYCLING ESTABLISHMENTS

6.1 No person shall operate or keep a salvage yard or recycling establishment within the Township of Tay without first obtaining a licence to do so.

6.2 Site Plan – Requirement: In the case of an application for a Salvage Yard/Recycling Establishment Licence, where the Township has enacted a site plan control by-law pursuant to the provisions of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, which would apply to the lands an premises set forth in the application, the applicant shall provide a copy of the required site plan agreement to the Clerk, or designate, along with the application for the licence.

6.3 Unless otherwise specified in a site plan agreement, referred to in Section 6.2 of this By-law, no person shall operate a salvage yard/recycling establishment unless that part of the yard used for the keeping, storing, processing, fabricating, wrecking, sorting, cutting or selling of any of the substances referred to in this By-law, or any second-hand goods, is totally enclosed by a fence and/or berm no less than 2.4 metres and no more than 3.6 metres in height, of a quality and material approved by the Director of Planning & Development, or their designate, which fence and/or berm, shall at all times during the currently of any licence issued, be kept in good repair and free from any kind of hazard.

6.4 No owner or keeper of a salvage yard shall, after the coming into effect of this by-law, place any of the substances referred to in Section 1.4 of this by-law, or any second-hand goods, whether for storage or otherwise, or permit any such substances or second-hand goods to become so placed or stored, within an area 5 metres inside of the fence required by Section 6.3 so as to cause any such material to be stored or piled to a height higher than 0.3 metres below the height of the fence erected in compliance with that section or pursuant to a site plan agreement referred to in Section 6.2.

6.5 Every owner or keeper of a salvage yard shall take all reasonable steps to ensure the control and minimization of: (a) litter in and around the salvage yard/recycling establishment; (b) dust in the salvage yard/recycling establishment on the roadways in its immediate vicinity; (c) the presence of rodents and other pests; (d) unnecessary noise caused by machinery or equipment and noise disturbing to members of the public; (e) harmful and other negative effects upon the quality of life of inhabitants in the vicinity of the salvage yard

6.6 Lighting shall be installed, maintained and used in every salvage yard/recycling establishment in a manner sufficient to protect the health and safety of person within the salvage yard, and those coming to or leaving such yard.

By-law 2017-13 Page 6

6.7 A condition may be imposed on the issuing of a licence, such as requirements as to hours of operation of a salvage yard/recycling establishment as are deemed appropriate to prevent a nuisance to surrounding residents and users of land, and as are agreed upon by the applicant as a condition upon the issuing of the licence.

6.8 It shall be a condition of every licence issued under this Section that any person duly authorized by Council may at all reasonable times inspect any places or premises or part thereof used for the carrying on of any salvage yard/recycling establishment business which is licensed or required to be licensed under this By-law and any such person so authorized may inspect the books, records or other documents of the licensee relating to such trade, calling, business or occupation in conjunction with the regulation thereof.

7. LICENSING FOR AUCTIONEERS

7.1 No auctioneer or person shall operate, maintain or engage in the business, trade or occupation of an auctioneer within the Township of Tay without first having obtained a licence to do so.

7.2 Every person who wishes to carry on business as an Auctioneer within the Township of Tay shall obtain a valid Annual or Event Auctioneers Licence and receive zoning clearance prior to the license being issued. on a one-time basis is required to submit the necessary application form and obtain zoning clearance, together with the prescribed fee for an Auctioneers Event License as set out in the Township’s User Fees & Service Charges By-law.

7.3 An Auctioneers Event License issued under Section 7.2 shall be valid for the date and location listed on the application and is not transferable to any other auction. No refund shall apply if an auction is cancelled.

7.4 Every Auctioneer licensed under this By-law shall include in all public advertisements of any nature for an auction within the Township, the Auctioneer's name and License Number.

7.5 No Auctioneer licensed under this By-law shall: (a) Permit any disorder in the auction room or offices;

(b) Conduct or permit to be conducted any mock auction;

(c) Knowingly make, or permit to be made, any misrepresentation as to the nature, content quantity or value of any goods, wares, merchandise or effects offered for sale;

(d) Bidding; give away articles or sell articles for nominal amounts for the purpose of stimulating

(e) Do any act that is calculated to, or which may reasonably have the effect of, confusing a purchaser as the amount to be paid for any article(s);

(f) Avail the services of, or act in concert with, persons known in the trade as "beaters", "boosters" or "shills" for the purpose of raising or stimulating bids;

(g) Sell or put up for sale by auction any goods, wares, merchandise or effects held on a reserve bid basis without first announcing to those in attendance. By-law 2017-13 Page 7

7.6 Every Auctioneer licensed under this By-law shall: (a) Keep proper books of account of the business transacted at every auction;

(b) List the names, addresses and phone numbers of the owners of the goods, wares, merchandise or effects to be sold, and the description of same and the sale price at the auction;

(c) List the names and addresses of persons purchasing goods, wares, merchandise or effects, or any portion thereof, sold by auction and the purchase price.

(d) Forthwith after the auction account for the proceeds and pay such amounts to the persons entitled to such proceeds, less the Auctioneer's legal and proper commissions and charges.

(e) In the case where no sale is made of such goods, wares, merchandise or effects, return such goods to the person(s) entitled to receive such goods upon the proper demand and payment of the Auctioneer's legal and proper costs and charges.

7.7 Every Auctioneer licensed under this By-law shall be responsible for the performance and observance of all regulations under this By-law by all persons connected directly or indirectly to the operation of an auction.

7.8 Every person carrying on business or engaged in business as an Auctioneer shall allow the Township or its Officers, at any reasonable time, to inspect places or premises used in the carrying on of the auction or its related business and said inspection may include such records as may be required under this By-law.

7.9 A Auctioneers License shall not be required by the following persons: (a) A sheriff or bailiff offering for sale goods and chattels seized under execution or distrained for rent;

(b) Service clubs and registered charitable organizations conducting Silent Auctions and Chinese Auctions;

(c) or a person offering for sale goods or wares by auction for the purpose of raising money for either a religious, charitable, philanthropic patriotic purpose.

8. REPLACEMENT AND REGISTRATION OF A LICENSE

8.1 An Applicant licensed under this By-law may apply for a Replacement License in the event that a valid License is lost or destroyed. Prior to the issuance of the Replacement License, the Applicant shall provide a written request to the Clerk and shall pay the prescribed fees.

8.2 A License issued under this By-law is personal to the Applicant and is not transferable to any other person, or to any other location.

8.3 The Clerk shall keep a License Register containing the business name, address, telephone number, contact name and License Number for each Applicant licensed under this By-law. In the event that a Replacement License is issued, the Clerk shall note the cancellation of the previous License Number and the new number assigned.

8.4 The Applicant shall forthwith provide any changes in the information provided on the application form to the Clerk and the Clerk shall amend the License Register, as required.

By-law 2017-13 Page 8

9. REFUSAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A LICENSE

9.1 The Township reserves the right to refuse, suspend or revoke a License where: (a) The Township has suspended or revoked a License held by the Applicant within the preceding 12 month period;

(b) The Applicant has failed to comply with the provisions of this by- law, or any other applicable by-laws of the Township, or of an applicable statute, order-in-council or regulation of the Provincial Legislature or the Parliament of Canada;

(c) The Township has reasonable grounds to allege that the Applicant has failed to comply with provisions of this by-law, or any other applicable by-laws of the Township, or of any applicable statute, order-in-council or regulation of the Provincial Legislature or the Parliament of Canada.

9.2 In addition to 9.1 the Township reserves the right to suspend an Auctioneers License where; (a) The Township has received a formal complaint detailing an alleged violation of the terms of this By-law. To be deemed a formal complaint, the complaint shall be in writing and include the name of the Auctioneer, the date and location of the auction, specific details regarding the alleged violation and shall pay the prescribed fee set out in the Township’s User Fees & Service Charges By-law.

9.3 Where Council wishes to hold a Hearing to consider whether to refuse, suspend or revoke a License, a) The Clerk shall fix a date and time for such Hearing and shall mail a Notice of Hearing to the Applicant at the address as shown on the Application form and to Complainant, if any.

b) Such Notice of Hearing shall be mailed to the Applicant and Complainant at least fifteen days prior to the date and time fixed for such Hearing.

9.4 At the Hearing; a) Council shall receive a report, either verbally or in writing, from the Clerk and/or Officer(s) or employees of the Township as may be considered by Council.

b) Council shall afford the Applicant, either personally or through an agent or solicitor, an opportunity to present such material and evidence relevant to the issue before Council as deemed expedient and may ask questions of any person presenting evidence or a report to Council relevant to the said issue.

c) Council may, in its sole discretion, afford any other person who applied to be heard and who appears to have an interest in the matters under discussion, an opportunity to present material and ask questions of any person presenting evidence or a report to Council relevant to the said issues.

d) For the purposes of this section, a quorum of Council shall be a majority of the members of Council and a decision by the majority of members present shall be the decision of Council.

e) Council may, after having heard all of the evidence and submissions retire into the Closed Session to debate the matter and to reach its decision.

f) The decision made by Council sitting in the Closed Session shall be confirmed in open Council by resolution immediately following the Closed Session and a certified copy of such resolution shall By-law 2017-13 Page 9 be mailed by the Clerk to the Applicant, the Complainant and any person who has appeared before Council and requested that a copy of the resolution be provided.

g) The decision of Council to refuse, suspend or revoke a License may be subject to such terms as Council shall impose and shall be final. Such decision may also include direction to refund, in whole or in part, the Investigation Fee.

10. PENALTIES

10.1 Every person who contravenes any of the provisions of this by-law and every director or officer of a corporation, who knowingly concurs in the contravention by the corporation, is guilty of an offence under the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended.

10.2 Every person who contravenes the provisions of this by-law and every director or officer of a corporation, who knowingly concurs in the contraventions by the corporation, is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a penalty where the minimum fine shall not exceed $500 and a maximum fine shall not exceed $100,000 exclusive of costs under the provisions of the Municipal Act 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended.

10.3 For the purpose of continuous offences, every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law and every director or officer of a corporation who knowingly concurs in the contravention of a by-law of the corporation is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a penalty not exceeding $10,000, exclusive of costs under the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended.

10.4 Despite section 10.3 and the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 as amended, the total of all daily fines for the offence is not limited to $100,000.

10.5 For the purpose of multiple offences, every person who contravenes any provision of this by-law and every director or officer of a corporation who knowingly concurs in the contravention of a by-law of the corporation is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a penalty not exceeding $10,000, exclusive of costs under the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended.

10.6 Despite section 10.5 and the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, the total of all daily fines for the offence is not limited to $100,000.

10.7 Every person who fails to comply with a notice made under this By-law is guilty of an offence.

10.8 It shall be an offence for a person to hinder or obstruct, or attempt to hinder or obstruct, an Officer who is exercising a power or performing a duty under the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, or under a by-law passed under the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended.

10.9 Any person who has been alleged to have contravened any of the provisions of a by-law passed under the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended shall identify themselves to the Officer upon request. Failure to do so shall be deemed to have obstructed or hindered the Officer in the execution of the Officer’s duties.

10.10 Every person who contravenes any section of this by-law under a part 1 ticket, upon conviction shall be liable to a fine as provided for in the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O 1990, Chapter P.33 as amended.

10.11 Upon conviction any penalty imposed under this By-law may be collected under the authority of the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P.33, as amended. By-law 2017-13 Page 10

11. TOWNSHIP NOT LIABLE

11.1 The Township assumes no liability for property damage or personal injury resulting from remedial action, remedial work and enforcement undertaken with respect to any person or property that is subject of this by-law.

12. VALIDITY AND SEVERABILITY

12.1 Should any section, subsection, clause, paragraph or provision of this by-law be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not affect the validity of the enforceability of any other provision of this by-law, or of the by-law as a whole.

13. SEPARATE OFFENCE

13.1 For the purpose of this by-law, each day of a continued offence shall be deemed to be a separate offence.

14. SHORT TITLE

14.1 The short title of this by-law is the Business Licensing By-law.

15. REPEAL

15.1 That By-law 2009-29 as amended be hereby repealed.

16. ENACTMENT

16.1 That this by-law shall take force and take effect immediately upon the final passage thereof.

16.2 That existing salvage yards be granted one year from date of passage to come into compliance with the business licensing requirements set out in Section 6.

BY-LAW READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY

______MAYOR, Scott Warnock

______DEPUTY CLERK, Robert Lamb

By-law 2017-13 Page 11

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY PART 1 PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT

By-Law #2017-13: Business Licensing

ITEM Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Short Form Wording Provision Set Fine Creating or Defining Offence

1 Fail to obtain a valid Hawker and Peddler Section 3.1 $135.00 Licence. 2 Fail to obtain a valid Refreshment Vehicle Section 4.1 $500.00 Licence. 3 Fail to obtain a valid Farmers’ Market Section 5.1 $135.00 Licence. 4 Fail to obtain a valid Salvage Section 6.1 $1000.00 Yards/Recycling Establishment Licence. 5 Fail to obtain a valid Auctioneer Licence. Section 7.1 $135.00

6 Fail to obtain a valid Auctioneers Event Section 7.2 $135.00 License. 7 Obstruct an Officer or Agent Section $500.00 10.8

Note: The penalty provision(s) for the offences indicated above is Section 10.10 of By-Law #2017-13 a certified Copy of which has been filed.

By-law 2017-13 Page 12

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY PART 1 PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT

By-Law #2017-13: Business Licensing

ITEM Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Short Form Wording Provision Set Fine Creating or Defining Offence

1 Fail to obtain a valid Hawker and Peddler Section 3.1 Licence. 2 Fail to obtain a valid Refreshment Vehicle Section 4.1 Licence. 3 Fail to obtain a valid Farmers’ Market Section 5.1 Licence. 4 Fail to obtain a valid Salvage Section 6.1 Yards/Recycling Establishment Licence. 5 Fail to obtain a valid Auctioneer Licence. Section 7.1

6 Fail to obtain a valid Auctioneers Event Section 7.2 License. 7 Obstruct an Officer or Agent Section 10.8

Note: The penalty provision(s) for the offences indicated above is Section 10.10 of By-Law #2017-13 a certified Copy of which has been filed.

PORTARAMA FAMILY FESTIVAL c/o PO Box 490, 715 4th Ave, Port McNiicoll, Ontario L0K 1R0 [email protected] ~ www.portarama.ca

February 21, 2019

Fire Chief Brian Thomas Township of Tay ** SENT VIA EMAIL **

Dear Chief Thomas:

On behalf of the Portarama Family Festival, I am hereby requesting an exemption to the fireworks bylaw for our 2018 Portarama Fireworks Display as follows: Saturday May 18th – we will be ending the festivities with a firework display at dusk at Patterson Park (rain date of Sunday May 19th)

The display will be provided by Dean Fritz of Pyroworld Inc. Dean has been providing the fireworks for Portarama for several years and has a good relationship with the Township of Tay I believe.

I hope that I have provided the information required for a fireworks bylaw exemption. I am always available to discuss anything I may have left out. Thanks for your consideration.

Respectfully,

Heather Delong Co-Chair, Portarama Committee

http://www.facebook.com/portarama

General Government & Finance Committee March 13, 2019

Agenda

1. Call to Order:

2. Reports of Municipal Officials: 2.1 Report from the C.A.O. Re: CAO’s Report – February 7 to March 6, 2019 2.2 Report from the Clerk Re: Clerk’s Report – February 2019 2.3 Report from the Clerk Report No. GGF-2019-18 Re: Sale of Land Policy 2.4 Report from the Clerk Report No. GGF-2019-21 Re: Integrity Commissioner 2.5 Report from the Director of Finance Report No. GGF-2019-19 Re: 2018 Statement of Remuneration and Expenses 2.6 Report from the Financial Analyst Report No. GGF-2019-20 Re: 2018 Year End – Capital 3. Other Business: 3.1 Verbal from the C.A.O. Re: Selection of 2 Council Members for the Ad Hoc Committee to select the Strategic Plan Consultant 4. Items for Information: 4.1 Correspondence from Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit Re: Public & Environmental Health Implications of Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 4.2 Correspondence from Simcoe County Agricultural Hall of Fame Re: Annual General Meeting 4.3 Invitation from Huronia Community Foundation Re: Community Grants Information Session for Charities 4.4 Correspondence from the Township of Springwater Re: Annual Log-Sawing Contest – Elmvale Maple Syrup Festival 4.5 Correspondence from Mayor Cornell to the Premier of Ontario Re: Ensuring Ontarians have enough money to feed themselves and their families

General Government & Finance 1 March 13, 2019 Committee Agenda

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance Committee

Chair: Deputy Mayor Gerard LaChapelle

Date: March 13, 2019

Subject: CAO’s Report – February 7 to March 6, 2019

The following are some of the highlights for this time period:

 Held bi-weekly department head meetings.  Held a conference call with other north Simcoe CAO’s to talk about the February 19th meeting with the provincial facilitators doing the regional review for the provincial government.  Attended regular quarterly meeting of all the County of Simcoe CAO’s to discuss issues in common.  Along with the Mayor met with Michael Fenn the provincial facilitator to discuss the Township’s position on the various topics raised during that session and in the circulated agenda.  C.A.O.’s office has been busy doing various H.R. related items for both the Corporation and the Library Board. Most of the interviews by department heads/managers have now been held and subsequent offers of employment are being prepared for the various summer student positions throughout the corporation.  Held multiple meetings with various Councillors on different issues or concerns.  With the assistance of the Deputy Treasurer (who is also our benefits administrator) conducted an internal review of our various benefit policies and procedures.  Along with the Mayor attended a presentation made by the regional doctor recruitment committee. They will be coming to Council later in the spring to make a formal presentation.  Attended the quarterly PACED (Presidents Advisory Committee on Economic Development) at Lakehead University.  Meet with Inspector Ferguson O.P.P. to be briefed on an initiative that he will be coming before Council in April to present.

Respectfully submitted; Robert J. Lamb, CAO

General Government/Finance - 1 - March 13, 2019 CAO’s Monthly – February 2019

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance Committee

Chair: Deputy Mayor LaChapelle

Date: March 13, 2019

Subject: Clerk’s Report – February 2019

The following are the highlights from February 14 to March 6, 2019:

o Transferred numerous records to Simcoe County Archives on February 26th. This year’s focus was on making space in the vault so boxes of by-laws and other records will be sent down for proper archival storage.

o Organized and held emergency management training for elected officials on February 21st with the County of Simcoe. Attendees were from all four north simcoe municipalities and the sessions were well received.

o Seniors Advisory Committee meeting on March 2, 2019 - The Committee discussed an array of topics such as how to promote senior resources within the area, Monthly Senior Session, and a potential grant application to the County’s new grant program in order to facilitate the development of a seniors aging plan for Tay.

o Horticulture Committee meeting on February 14, 2019 - The Committee discussed their 2019 project of placing decorative bicycles (painted with flowers) at various locations, reviewed the Lily Garden Awards program, and discussed the content of their Spring/Summer Newsletter.

o Destruction of 2018 election records, including ballots, was completed on February 28th in accordance with the legislation.

o Researched the following reports on Committee’s agenda: . Land Sale Policy Update . Business Licensing By-law Housekeeping Update . Integrity Commissioner

Once the updated Land Sale Policy is approved by Council staff will report back with a list of proposed properties for Council’s consideration.

Respectfully submitted; Alison Gray, Clerk

General Government/Finance - 1 - March 13, 2019 Clerk’s Monthly – February 2019

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance

Chair: Deputy Mayor LaChapelle

Meetingn Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: GGF-2019-18

Report Title: Sale of Land Policy

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. GGF-2019-18 regaarding Sale of Land Policy be received;

And that Council provides any comments on the draft policy to staff by noon on March 20th, so that staff may bring a final report forward to the March 27th Council meetingn , with the required by-law.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

Section 270 of the Municipal Act (the “Act”) requires tthat every municipality adopt and maintain various policies, including a policy respecting sale of land. The Act used to have a specific section detailing a specific process for the sale of land; however, this was repealed and replaced with Section 270 many years ago.

The Township adopted its current policy in 2008. In 2013, the policy was expanded to address the sale of lanewaays throuughout Port McNicoll; however, a comprehensive review has not been conducted since 2008.

ANALYSIS:

Attached for Council’s consideration is an updated policy which outlines the methods throughh which the Township will consider the sale of land.

General Government & Finance 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-18

The Township does receive a number of inquiries annually to purchase lands or laneways within the Township, in addition to any parcels brought forward to Council’s attention by staff.

While the policy has received some updates, the policy leaves the most substantive parts of the existing policy in place. Of particular note the policy maintains the existing practice that any buildable lands be sold through real estate or public tender, while non-buildable lands (landlocked lands, laneways, etc.) shall be sold by direct sale or other method. The majority of the changes have been made to simplify the policy and make it easier for the public and staff to work with.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact as a result of this report.

The policy requires that when lands are sold, external costs including advertising, survey and legal costs are typically born by the purchaser.

It should be noted that internal staff costs are not generally included; however, due to the significant staff resources required to review and manage each inquiry, a $500 land sale inquiry fee was added many years ago to the Township’s Fees & Charges By-law. The fee has also served to separate those who are just curious about a piece of land versus serious purchasers.

CONCLUSION:

Staff is recommending that the updated Sale of Land Policy be adopted.

Prepared By: Alison Gray, Clerk

Recommended By: Date: February 27, 2019

Alison Gray, BAH, CMO, AOMC Clerk

Reviewed By:

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment: Updated Sale of Land Policy

General Government & Finance 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-18

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 1 of 8

1. Purpose:

Per Section 270 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, municipalities are required to adopt and maintain a policy to govern the sale and other disposition of land. The purpose of this policy is to set out the principles governing the sale of land by the municipality.

2. Definitions: “Act” means the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, as aamended;

“Appraisal” means a written opinion of the Fair Market Value of the surplus land provided by a land appraiser or real estate agent;

“Clerk” means the Clerk of the Corporation of the Township of Tay or their designate as appointed by by-law;

“Council” means the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Tay;

“Direct Sale” means the sale of land directly to one or more purchasers outside of a public tender or real estate process.

“Fair Market Value” means the purchase price that a propertty might be expected to realize if offered for sale on the open market by a willing seller to a willingn buyer;

"Municipality" shall mean The Corporation of the Township of Tay.

“Notice” means notification provided to the ppublic in accordance with this policy;

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 2 of 8

“Surplus Land” shall mean any land of the Township of Tay declared surplus by the Council of the Township of Tay by resolution or By-law.

3. Classes of Property Exempt from Policy 3.1 The provisions of this Policy shall apply to all classes of land owned by the Municipality, save and except: a) the sale of lands for the arrears of taxes which shall be subject to the procedures set out in Part XI of the Act; b) the sale of lands under the Expropriations Act; and c) the sale of the classes of land exempted under the Act as follows: i. Land sold under Section 110 (Municipal Capital Facilities) ii. Land to be used for the establishment and carrying on of industries and industrial operations and incidental uses subject to Section 106 of the Act.

4. Prerequisites to the Sale of Lane

4.1 Surplus Land – Council shall, prior to the sale of land, determine by by-law or resolution, that the subject lands are surplus to the requirements of the municipality.

4.2 Method of Sale – The Township shall dispose of land through one of the following methods and processed in accordance with procedures set out in ‘Appendix A’: a) sale by public tender; b) engaging a real estate firm(s) or broker; c) direct sale; d) other method as determined and at the discretion of Council.

4.2.1 Buildable Lands – All buildable lands, as defined by the Township’s planning regulations, shall be sold by public tender or real estate firm or broker. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 3 of 8

4.2.2 Non Buildable Lands – Any lands tooo small to meet the Township’s planning regulations ffor a building lot shall be sold by direct sale or other method.

4.2.3 Unsolicited Offers a) unsolicited offers to purchase real estatee may be considered by Council; b) where more than one (1) person has exprressed an interest in purchasing real property, or whether Council believes it to be in the best interest of the municipality, Council may direct that the real property be sold through the Township’s real estate agent.

4.3 Appraisal – The Township prior to the sale of any land: a) May obtain or require an Appraisal of the Fair Market Value of the land from:  a real estate brokerage firm or an independent real estate agent, or  an independent qualified appraiser who shall be a registered member in good standinng of the Appraisal Institute of Canada, or  the Clerk if in their opinion sufficient applicable information is on file to determine a fair market value. b) Notwithstandingn the foregoing, the Municipality shall not be required to obtain an appraisal with respect to the sale of those classes of land set out in Section 4.3.1 hereafter, however, Council may, at its discretion, determine that an appraisal is necessary for such sale. 4.3.1 No appraisal is required for the sale of the following classes of land; a) 12-14’ laneways – laneways that run dowwn the rear or side of a property within Port McNicoll shall be sold for $1.00 plus costs. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 4 of 8

b) 0.3 metre reserve – land 0.3 metres or less in width acquired in connection with an approval or decision under the Planninng Act. d) no higi hway access – land that does not have direct access to a highway, if sold to an owner of land abutting that land. e) Expropriations Act – land repurchased by an owner in accordance with the Expropriations Act. f) other municipalities – land sold/trransferred to a municipality. g) the Crown – land transferred to the Crown in Right of Ontario or Canada or their agents.

4.4 Public Notice - Prior to the sale oof any land, the municipality shall give notice to the public of the proposed sale as set out within this policy.

Notice shall be given by publication of a notice for a minimum of two weeks in a local newspaper, Township website and notice board. If more than four years has passed since the lands were declared surplus and notice given, an addition one week’s notice shall be given prior to the required land sale by-law beinng considered.

Nothing in this policy shall prevent the Clerk from using a more comprehensive method of giving Notice or providing for longer or shorter Notice period, so directed by by-law/resolution of council.

5. Clerk’s Certificate 5.1 The Clerk of the municipality may issue a Certificate with respect to the sale of land verifying that to the best of his/her knowledge, the requirements of the municipality’s by-laws have been completed in accordance with the requirements of the municipality.

6. General THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 5 of 8

6.1 All offers shall be presented to Council in Closed Session for deliberation.

6.2 No offer shall be accepted which contains a condition requiring the support of Council to an application under the Planning Act.

6.3 Council is not obligated to sell lands that have been declared surplus.

6.4 Purchasers are responsible for all costs incurred by a land saale transaction including, but not limited to: application/inquiry fees, public notice fees, survey fees, legal fees, and such costs associated with the land sale.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 6 of 8

Appendix A – Land Sale Procedures

The following procedures shall be followed for the sale of lands by the municipality:

1. Real Estate Firm or Broker Where the method of sale is by way of a real estate firm or broker, the Municipality shall: a) Conduct an administrative review of the lands to be considered for sale b) Obtain an appraisal. c) Declare the property surplus (report to Council). c) Give notice that the lands have been declared surplus and listed with a real estate ageent at least once in a local newspaper, posting the notice on the Municipal Office Notice Board, and on the Township’s website. d) List the property for sale through a real estate agent who shall maintain the listing. e) Upon receipt of an offer to purchase the real estate agent shall attend a Closed Session and present the offer to Council. Council has the right to accept, reject or sign back the offer to purchase provided by the Real Estate Agent. f) Once an offer is accepted, the Clerk shaall bring forward the required by-law to sell the lands.

2. Direct Sale - Unsolicited Where the method of sale is by direct unsolicited sale, the Municipality shall: a) Review the offer in Closed Session. If the offer is reasonable sign back the offer with sufficient time to facilitate the procedures set out in the policy. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 7 of 8

b) If the lands have already been declared surplus and public notice already provided: a. Council may consider the offfer and accept, reject or sign back the offer. c) If the lands have not been decclared surplus: a. Conduct an administrativee review of the lands to be considered for sale b. Obtain an appraisal. c. Declare the property surplus (report to Council). d. Give notice that the lands have been declared surplus at least once in a local newspaper, posting the notice on the Municipal Office Notice Board, and on the Township’s website. e. Accept the offer to purchase. d) Once an offer is accepted, the Clerk shall bring forward the required by-law to sell the lands.

e) The purchaser is responsible for all costs incurred by this transaction including, but not limited tto: application fees, public notice fees, survey feees, legal fees, and such costs associated with the land sale.;

3. Direct Sale - Port McNicoll Laneways Where it is proposed to sell a Port McNicoll 14’ laneway, the Municipality shall act in accordance with the following procedure: a) Upon receipt of an inquiry to purchase a 14’ laneway, beinng the payment of the Township’s inquiry fees and letter from an interested purchaser, a letter shall be sent to each abutting landowner inquiring as to wheether or noot they are interested in purchasing the portion of the lanewaay abuttinng their property. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 8 of 8

a. If all abutting landowners are interested, the laneway shall be declared surplus, sold and merged with the abutting owner’s land.

b. If sufficient landowners are interested whereby it does not result in orphaned laands, the laneway shall be declared surplus, sold and merged with the abuttinng owner’s land. Having not responded to the Township’s initial letter, the uninterested landowners will be deemed to have relinquished their interest and right to purchase the laneway.

Division of the Laneway: Portions of the laneways will be sold only to the owner(s) of the abutting land. Abutting land owners will not be permitted to purchase anythinng less than the seven (7) feet of the laneway which abuts all of the landowners property. If the direct rear facing property is not interested the entire fourteen (14) feet, or laneway width, shall be sold to the interested landowners.

b) Conduct an administrative review of the laneway to be sold. c) Once it is known which abuttinng landowners are interested, a deposit towards costs (i.e. advertising and survey works) shall be collected and a letter of agreement executed. d) Once the deposits and agreements are signed, the required survey work shall be ordered. e) Upon receipt of the survey, declare the property surplus (report to Council). f) Notice shall then be given that the lands have been declared surplus at least once in a loocal newspaper, posting the notice on the Municipal Office Notice Board, and on the Township’s website. g) The Clerk shall bring forward the required by-law to sell the lands. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY COUNCIL POLICIES MANUAL

SUBJECT: Administration EFFECTIVE DATE: Sale of Land September 10, 2008

REVISION DATE: PAGE: December 11, 2013 (Bylaw 2018-94) 9 of 8

h) The purchaser(s) is responsible for all costs incurred by this transaction including, but not limited to: application fees, public notice fees, survey fees, legal fees, and such costs associated with the land sale;

4. Other Method as Determined by Council Where any other method of sale is used, Council shall provide for: a) a determination of the sale price based on the Appraisal of the land value and any costs associated with the proposed method of sale; b) the method of public notice; c) where, when and who will receive the offers or bids; and d) any terms and conditions of the sale. Council may reserve the right to addjust the sale price where, in the opinion of Council, it is in the best interests of the Municipality to do so.

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance

Chair: Deputy Mayor LaChapelle

Meetingn Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: GGF-2019-21

Report Title: Integrity Commissioner

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. GGF-2019-221 regarding an Integrity Commissioner be received;

That the resignnation of Ms. Kristin Eliot, Integrity Commissioner, be received;

And that the Township issue a Request for Proposal for an Integrity Commissioner.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

Recent changes under the Municipal Act, 2001, mandated every municipality to establish a code of conduct and appoint an integrity commissioner.

The Act requires the appointment of an indeependent Integrity Commissioner (“IC”) who reports to Council. The “IC” assists membbers of council and local boards with the interpretation and application of codes of conduct, any procedures, rules and policies governing the ethical behaviour of members of Council and of its local boards, and the application of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.

The Township appointed its current IC, Kristin Eliot, in 2016. While the current contract is due to expire in August 2019, Ms. Eliot has submitted notice that she is terminating her contract early due to the newly expanded jurisdiction of the IC and competing demands from her legal practice.

General Government & Finance 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

Under the new legislation, a municipality may either appoint its own Integrity Commissioner or make provisions that the services of an Integrity Commissioner be provided by another municipality.

ANALYSIS:

The Township has two options with respect to the selection of a new Integrity Commissioner: 1 – Request for Proposal, or 2 – Use the County IC, being Principles Integrity.

Option 1 – Proceed with Request for Proposal (RFP) In 2016, when Council adopted its Code of Conduct, the Township conducted a RFP for the services of an IC. At the time four bids were received, and it is anticipated that if the Township proceeded with a RFP again that there would be multiple submissions as this is a growing field.

A list is available online of other municipalities that have appointed as IC’s for Council’s reference at http://www.amcto.com/Advocacy-Policy/Reports- Positions/Integrity-Commissioner-List

If Council wished to proceed with the RFP, the RFP would be issued immediately, and once submissions were received staff would report to Council with the results. Should Council not wish to proceed with the results of the RFP, Council choose not to award a contract and use the County of Simcoe’s IC.

Option 2 – Use the County IC Discussions amongst the Simcoe County Clerks identified the prospect of engaging a shared Integrity Commissioner. The County of Simcoe was supportive of a joint approach and subsequently commenced a request for proposals procurement process. As part of the process, a shortlist of qualified bidders was compiled, interviews were conducted, and references were verified. The RFP procurement process concluded with the selection of Principles Integrity as the Integrity Commissioner for the County of Simcoe and for any lower-tier municipality that wished to opt in.

Principles Integrity is operated by Mr. Jeffrey Abrams and Ms. Janice Atwood-Petkovski, experienced lawyers, with over 30 years of experience each working in and with several municipalities throughout the GTA including the cities of Toronto, Mississauga, Hamilton, Brampton, Vaughan and the Regional Municipality of York. Each of the principals has extensive municipal and governance experience. Principles Integrity has been appointed as Integrity Commissioner for many municipalities including the County of Simcoe and eleven of its lower tier municipalities (Severn, Collingwood, Wasaga Beach, Bradford-West Gwillimbury, Tiny, Clearview, Essa, Ramara, Springwater, Midland and Penetanguishene).

General Government & Finance 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

Under the terms of the County of Simcoe RFP, any municipality interested in participating with this firm would be required to adopt an appointment by- law (Appendix 1) and to enter into an agreement with Principles Integrity. The agreement shall be effective February 1, 2019 and expire March 31, 2021, subject to possible extensions. The agreement contains a clause that permits the cancellation of service and renewal would be subject to satisfactory delivery.

Additional services that may be provided by the Integrity Commissioner over the course of the contract may include, but not be limited to: providing assistance on potential amendments to the Council Code of Conduct, guidance on the application of and obligations of Members under the Council Code of Conduct, providing an independent mechanism for the resolution of complaints, and where necessary investigations of alleged breaches of the Council Code of Conduct and the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, providing advice to individual Members on the Council Code of Conduct, the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, and other policies and legislation governing ethical behaviour, and providing education and training regarding these policies.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT:

Option 1 Staff would report back upon receipt of the RFP’s with respect to the costs associated with the submissions.

Option 2 The cost to retain the services of Principles Integrity as the Town’s Integrity Commissioner are as follows:  Retainer - $1000 per participating municipality (County of Simcoe to incur cost).  Engaging the Services of Principles Integrity – $230 per hour, subject to the capped rates set out below, plus applicable taxes. Costs for services (consultative or investigative) to be borne by the benefiting municipality.  Training – $1,600 (including preparation time), plus applicable taxes, per day.  Review of the Code of Conduct – The costs associated with the review of a code of conduct by the IC are capped at $3,000.

2019 Budget The Township currently maintains an annual budget of $7,500 for IC Services.

General Government & Finance 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Township proceed with a Request for Proposal for Integrity Commissioner Services.

Prepared By: Alison Gray, Clerk

Recommended By: Date: March 5, 2019

Alison Gray, BAH, CMO, AOMC Clerk

Reviewed By:

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Attachment: Resignation – K. Eliot

General Government & Finance 4 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

General Government & Finance 5 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

General Government & Finance 6 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-21

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance

Chair: Deputy Mayor Gerard LaChapelle Meetingn Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: GGF-2019-19

Report Title: 2018 Statement of Remuneration and Expenses

RECOMMENDATION: That Report GGF-2019-19 rege arding the 2018 Statement of Remuneration and Expenses, paid to members of Council, Local Boards and Committees be received.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: It is a requirement of the Municipal Act that the Treasurer provide Council an itemized statement on remuneration and expenses paid in the previous year to members of council and to members appointed by the municipality to serve as a member of any body, including Local Boards. This report is due by March 31, of the following year.

ANALYSIS: Accordingly, under the provision of Section 284 (1) of the Municipal Act, 2001 the attached itemized statement is submitted disclosing remuneration and expenses for each member of Council and appointed members to our Local Boards and Committees for the year ended December 31, 2018.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: Funds are provided annually in the Township’s Operating Budget under the Council section for Council remuneration and expenses and under various departmental sections for Boards and Commiittees.

General Government & Finance 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-19

CONCLUSION: This report is provided to meet the requirements for reporting under section 284 (1) of the Municipal Act.

Prepared By; Date Prepared:

Joanne Sanders March 6, 2019 Treasurer

Reviewed By: Date:

March 6, 2019 Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

General Government & Finance 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-19

TOWNSHIP OF TAY

Summary of Remuneration and Expenses

Treasurer's Statement of Remuneration and Expenses paid as of December 31, 2018, as per the Municipal Act, Section 284.

COUNCIL Office Name Remuneration Per Diem Expenses Total Mayor Scott Warnock $ 23,883.75 $ 1,018.68 $ 5,062.92 $ 29,965.35 Deputy Mayor Dave Ritchie $ 17,308.50 $ 254.67 $ 2,844.20 $ 20,407.37 Councillor James Crawford $ 15,688.37 $ 254.67 $ 2,835.24 $ 18,778.28 Councillor Gerard LaChapelle $ 14,114.87 $ 2,008.12 $ 16,122.99 Councillor Heinrich Naumann $ 14,114.87 $ 275.00 $ 14,389.87 Councillor Catherine Root $ 14,114.87 $ 169.78 $ 3,032.16 $ 17,316.81 Councillor Sandy Talbot $ 15,398.04 $ 169.78 $ 1,888.17 $ 17,455.99 Councillor Jeff Bumstead $ 1,283.17 $ 1,283.17 Councillor Barry Norris $ 1,283.17 $ 1,283.17 Councillor Paul Raymond $ 1,283.17 $ 1,283.17 Councillor Mary Warnock $ 1,283.17 $ 1,283.17 Mayor Ted Walker $ 2,171.25 $ 432.48 $ 2,603.73 $ 121,927.20 $ 1,867.58 $ 18,378.29 $ 142,173.07

Rates for Remuneration and Expenses as set by Motion No. 4 December 20, 2017 and By-Law 2018-17 Total Council Expenditures: Expenses Scott Warnock AMO Conference Expenses $ 2,048.24 Mileage - Various Meetings $ 715.55 GLSLCI Parliament Hill Day Expenses $ 760.04 GLSLCI AGM & Conference Expenses $ 1,020.14 GLSLCI Board Meeting Expenses $ 293.72 GLSLCI Mid-Winter Board Meeting Expenses $ 225.23 $ 5,062.92

Dave Ritchie AMO Conference Expenses $ 2,062.03 ROMA Conference Expenses $ 782.17 $ 2,844.20

James Crawford 2018 Internet Reimbursement $ 275.00 AMO Conference Expenses $ 2,127.76 Municipal Leadership Essentials $ 432.48 $ 2,835.24

Gerard LaChapelle 2018 Internet Reimbursement $ 275.00 OGRA Conference Expenses $ 1,733.12 $ 2,008.12

Heinrich Naumann 2018 Internet Reimbursement $ 275.00

Catherine Root 2018 Internet Reimbursement $ 275.00 ROMA Conference Expenses $ 720.43 AMO Conference Expenses $ 2,036.73 $ 3,032.16

Sandy Talbot 2018 Internet Reimbursement $ 300.00 OSUM Conference Expenses $ 805.35 ROMA Conference Expenses $ 782.82 $ 1,888.17

Ted Walker Municipal Leadership Essentials $ 432.48

LEGEND AMO Association of Municipalities Ontario ROMA Rural Ontario Municipal Association OGRA Ontario Good Roads Association OSUM Ontario Small Urban Municipalities GLSLCI Great Lakes St. Lawrence Cities Initiative

General Government & Finance 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-19

Boards and Committees The following per diems and expense reimbursements were made to persons appointed by Council to serve as members of the various boards/committees:

Recreation Committee Heritage Committee 1-1-1771-100-1225 1-1-8840-115-1225

BAKER, KEN$ 225.00 FEGARTY, TERRY$ 225.00 CARRIERE, NANCY$ 225.00 HEFFER, MATTHEW$ 25.00 CARRIERE, RAYMOND$ 320.00 LUCAS, SUSAN$ 225.00 GLIDDEEN, KRISTA$ 95.00 O'CONNOR, STAN - ESTATE OF$ 200.00 GUTKOWKSA, CATHY$ 320.00 TODD, JOHN$ 200.00 JOSEY, MARINA$ 105.00 $ 875.00 KILLICK, BRENDA$ 320.00 MAURICE, GEOFFREY$ 320.00 Seniors Advisory Committee MAURICE, SANDRA$ 220.00 1-1-1122-113-1225 MAURICE, TAMMY$ 320.00 OSTERTAG, TAMMY$ 235.00 GRANGER, JO-ANNE$ 125.00 PEARSON, CINDY$ 320.00 PATTULLO, JANET $ 175.00 VALE, DONNA$ 320.00 SNIDER, BERNADETTE $ 175.00 WAKISH, BETTY$ 105.00 WARNOCK, MARY$ 200.00 $ 3,450.00 $ 675.00

Property Standards Committee Audit Committee 1-1-1122-113-1225 1-1-1122-113-1225 CONSTANTIN, MARIE-CLAIRE$ 50.00 ENGLISH, MIKE$ 75.00 HEFFER, MATTHEW$ 50.00 PATTULLO, LARRY$ 75.00 OTT, ANDY$ 50.00 VAN DYK, JERRY$ 25.00 RUF, FRED$ 25.00 $ 175.00 VAN HALEM, MURRAY$ 50.00 $ 225.00

Library Board 3-6-6761-100-1225

CORYELL, BOB $ 250.00 RAMLER, JACKIE $ 225.00 READ, SUSAN $ 275.00 $ 750.00

Committee of Adjustment

MEETING REMUNERATION INSPECTION TIME MILEAGE TOTAL 1-1-8881-166-1225 1-1-8881-166-1221 1-1-8881-166-2405

CONSTANTINE, MARIE-CLAIRE $ 140.00 $ 30.89 $ 72.94 $ 243.83 HEFFER, MATTHEW $ 140.00 $ 31.31 $ 61.05 $ 232.36 OTT, ANDY $ 140.00 $ 41.76 $ 79.75 $ 261.51 RUF, FRED $ 105.00 $ 33.40 $ 30.25 $ 168.65 VAN HALEM, MURRAY $ 140.00 $ 58.45 $ 52.80 $ 251.25

$ 665.00 $ 195.81 $ 296.79 $ 1,157.60

General Government & Finance 4 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-19

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: General Government & Finance

Chair: Deputy Mayor LaChapelle

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: GGF-2019-20

Report Title: 2018 Year End Report - Capital RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. GGF-2019-20 regarding the 2018 Year End Report- Capital be received;

And that Staff be authorized to adjust the transfer from the Municipal Fleet & Equipment (Fire Capital) Reserve by $4,717 to reflect the cost of additional portable radios needed for new recruits;

And that Staff be authorized to adjust the transfer from the Parks and Recreation Reserve by a total $4,011 to reflect the project overage on the First Avenue Trail;

And that Staff be authorized to use the balance of deferred gas tax funds amounting to $3,105 towards the 2018 Roads Capital Program;

And that the net cost of $43,555 incurred to supply and install conduit for future telecommunication projects in the Paradise Point and Grandview Beach area be funded from the Contingency Reserve;

And that the future connection charges applicable of approximately $62,977 for properties in the Grandview Beach and Paradise Point area be funded from the Water Capital Reserve until they become payable by the benefiting property owners (by January 1, 2021);

General Government & Finance 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED: And that the project overage of $351,000 noted on the 2017/2018 watermain replacement, road reconstruction and drainage works project be funded from additional revenues and other budget underages in the Roads Capital Program ($125,800), the Future Capital Reserve/2018 Operating Surplus ($168,000) and the Water Capital Reserve ($57,200);

And whereas the project costs for the watermain and road reconstruction work completed in Grandview Beach and Paradise Point have exceeded the original estimate of $6,900,000; That the total project funding be amended as follows:

Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund – Formula Based Component - $ 311,044 Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund – Top-Up Component - 1,486,931 Clean Water and Wastewater Fund - 221,679 Paradise Point and Grandview Beach Grant – 2,675,342 Gas Tax Fund - 313,208 Water Capital Reserve - 888,416 Contingency Reserve - 44,555 Tax Rate/Development Charges - 969,453 2018 Operating Surplus/Contingency Reserve - 110,004 Benefiting Property Owners - 315,640 Other Agencies (Bell) - 14,089

For a total project funding of $7,350,361

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The attached report summarizes capital expenditures to December 31st. Only significant budget variances (and their funding sources) that have not been previously identified have been highlighted in this report.

ANALYSIS:

Schedule “A” attached shows at a high level, the variances compared to budget.

In order to effectively read the schedules, the reader should know that:

 An expenditure that is under budget creates a favourable variance. This is displayed on the report as a positive number.

 An expenditure that is over budget creates an unfavourable variance. This displayed as a negative number.

General Government & Finance 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

In many cases projects and/or equipment purchases are funded from reserves and therefore an under budget results in less funds being drawn from the reserve. Savings or overages resulting from changes in Water and Wastewater are transferred to/from their respective reserves. Only projects or purchases that are funded from current year taxation will result in a capital surplus/deficit.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT:

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Accessibility Retro-fit – Reception Counter After re-assessing the needs of staff and the general public, Council decided not to proceed with the project and to return the $18,500 grant received from the Enabling Accessibility Fund. At the time, design work and electrical upgrades had already been completed. The 2017 surplus funds committed to this project of $5,550 have been used to partially fund this work. The balance of this work ($10,838) has been funded from the Municipal Building Reserve.

PROTECTION TO PERSONS AND PROPERTY

FIRE

Digital Radio Conversion The contract to complete the digital conversion was approved by Council at $92,364 (including net HST) via report PPP-2018-53. Additional portable radios (8) purchased at a cost of $4,717 for new recruits were needed, as the old spare radios are no longer in service. It is recommended that the additional radios purchased at a cost of $4,717 be funded from the Municipal Fleet and Equipment (Fire Capital) Reserve.

PARKS AND RECREATION

First Avenue Trail Overall the project was over-budget by $4,011 due to the pedestrian handrails installed over culvert crossings. It is recommended that the project overage of $4,011 be funded from the Parks and Recreation Reserve.

General Government & Finance 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

Construction Projects 2017/2018 Roads/Water Project

In report PW-2018-70 Public Works requested that the project budget be extended to $3.0M to cover actual works incurred on the 2017/2018 watermain replacement, road reconstruction and drainage works project. The total road and drainage works portion of this overage was estimated at $250,000, actual overage is $294,000, as the split between water and roads has since been adjusted. The project overage can be reduced down to $168,000 due to additional Development Charge revenue and budget surpluses noted on the gravel program, the resurfacing of Gervais Road and the design budget for John Dillingno and Albert Street. It is recommended that the remaining roads portion of this project overage be funded from the Future Capital Reserve (current balance $100,200) and the 2018 Operating Surplus. The total water works portion of this overage was estimated at $100,000, actual overage is $57,200. It is also recommended that funding for the water portion of this project overage of $57,200 be funded from the Water Capital Reserve.

Grandview Beach & Paradise Point Total project funding of $6.9M was outlined in reports PW-2017-68 and PW- 2017-74, of which $4.4M was apportioned to water and the other $2.5M to roads. With the project now complete, actual road costs are $1.7M and the net total water project costs (to-date) equate to $5.2M (excluding costs recoverable).

Roads All road costs have been allocated to the Roads Capital Program. The original estimate of works was $2,500,000 which was based on full road reconstruction. Full reconstruction would have required either internal or external debt financing, as this amount far exceeds our annual roads budget. The 2018 budget set of $1,573,895 was based on contract award and available funding. There were a number of changes to the base contract made along the way including additional drainage works and the upgrade from surface treatment to asphalt. With most of the contract change order/claims settled, the resulting overage for the roads portion of this project is $124,800. The project overage can be reduced down to $110,000 due to additional revenues (gas tax, DC’s) allocated to the roads program. It is recommended that this overage be funded from any remaining 2018 Operating Surplus and the Contingency Reserve if necessary.

General Government & Finance 4 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

Water Additional challenges related to the design, installation and operation of the municipal watermain, as well as costs incurred related to on-property works that are not recoverable account for the water portion of this overage (last update on contractor claims-PW-2018-38). There are also costs incurred for the installation of conduit in the watermain trench that at this time are not collectible ($44,500). It is recommended that these costs be funded from the Contingency Reserve, with the intent that the reserve be replenished should these costs be recovered. Finally, there is the outstanding rock claim that is currently under dispute, that if settled, the cost would be apportioned to water. It is recommended that the water portion of this project overage be funded from the remaining Grandview Beach and Paradise Point grant held by the Township (less funds already committed for the Hydrogeological Study for the area) and that the balance come from the Water Capital Reserve.

The table below updates the proposed funding for the project, based on the project costs incurred to date;

Funding Source Amount

Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund – Formula Based Component $ 311,044 Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund – Top-Up Component 1,486,931 Clean Water and Wastewater Fund 221,679 Paradise Point and Grandview Beach Grant 2,675,342 Gas Tax Fund 313,208 Water Capital Reserve 888,416 Contingency Reserve 44,555 Tax Rate/Development Charges 969,453 2018 Operating Surplus/Contingency Reserve 110,004 Benefiting Property Owners 315,640 Other Agencies (Bell) 14,089

TOTAL $7,350,361

General Government & Finance 5 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

CONCLUSION:

Staff is recommending that year end reserve transfers be adjusted to reflect the actual spending from the 2018 capital program.

Prepared By: Lindsay Barron, Financial Analyst

Recommended By:

Joanne Sanders Director of Finance/Treasurer

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D.

Chief Administrative Officer

General Government & Finance 6 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Administration

Equipment Mini-Mailer/Stuffer 12,104 16,000 3,896 Purchase complete under budget.

Printer/Fax/Copier Public Works - 7,000 7,000 Equipment functioning well. Carry forward to 2019. Colour Laser Printers - 6,000 6,000 Postage Machine - 7,500 7,500 Council approved additional project funding of $8,804 in June to come from the 2018 operating Community Sign Boards - LED Conversion 5,314 3,000 (2,314) surplus. (GGF-2018-34). Balance to carry forward to 2019. Computer Hardware Acquisition Purchase completed . County no longer providing laptops to Mayor and Deputy. Variance identified Council Laptops 8,107 6,250 (1,857) in GGF-2018-65. PC/Monitor Replacements/New 0 65,506 65,506 Carry forward to 2019 Financial Server 0 25,000 25,000 Officer Server 0 23,254 23,254 VPN Router/Firewall 0 5,000 5,000 ID Card Printer 2,742 0 (2,742) Server Infrastructure 1,451 0 (1,451)

Computer Software Acquisition Pro jects carried forward to 2019 Land Manager Upgrade - 9,000 9,000 Work Order System - 9,000 9,000 p lete. Municipal Administration Building MunicipalHVAC units Administration Building 20,875 30,000 9,125 Purchase and Installation com After re-assessing the needs of staff and the general public, Council decided not to proceed Accessibility Retro-fit - Reception Counter 16,388 37,000 20,612 with the project and to return theg Accessibilit$18,500 grant y Fund. received from the Enablin Municipal Administration Building Project to be carried forward to 2019. Quotes Walkway into building - 7,000 7,000 receivedg et wereto be allrevised greater in Athan budget.p ril. 2019 Bud Total Administration 66,982 256,510 189,528

General Government & Finance 7 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation

Protection to Persons & Property No Capital

Total PPP 0 0 0

By-Law Enforcement No Capital

Total By-Law Enforcement 0 0 0

General Government & Finance 8 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Fire

Equipment: Ice Water Rescue Suits 3,043 4,000Purchase 957 complete. Transfer unspent amount to Bunker Suits 11,296 15,200reserve. 3,904 Auto Extrication 41,744 50,000Purchase 8,256 complete. Contract approved by Council at $92,364 (including

net HST) via report PPP-2018-53. Additional Digital Radio Conversion 97,232 82,000 (15,232)portable radios (8) purchased at a cost of $4,717 for new recruits.

Rescue Vehicle - Chassis already purchased Carry forward to 2019. Rescue received January (Hall 1) 0 175,720 175,720 2019. Carry forward to 2019. Rescue received February Pumper Truck (Hall 1) 0 435,830 435,830 2019.

Carried forward to 2019. Order placed in 2018. Tanker Truck (Hall 1) 0 250,000 250,000 Anticipate delivery early 2019.

Total Fire Department 153,315 1,012,750 859,435

General Government & Finance 9 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY

2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation

Roads Equipment

Plough Truck 250,000 - Carry 250,000 forward to 2019. Order placed in 2018 for Plough Truck 250,000 - delivery 250,000 summer of 2019. Plough Truck 250,000 - 250,000

Purchase completed under Budget. Trade in of $27,475 received for a net cost of $408,449.38. Grader 435,925 450,000 14,075

Purchase completed under Budget. Plough attachment for Articulating Tractor 23,874 50,000 26,126

Roads Equipment Total 459,798 1,250,000 790,202

General Government & Finance 10 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY Total Capital 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Roads Operations $5,000 has been carried forward to 2019 for final Road Needs Stud y - 5,000 5,000 work.

Engineering: Design of project on hold. Roads are not scheduled for rehabiliation within the next 3 Albert & John Dillingno - 31,876 31,876 years. Placement will be re-evaluated for the 2020 - 2029 LTP . Budget of $31,876 used towards 2018 Road Program deficit. Road Resurfacing:

Project completed under budget. Township labour and equipment costs totalling $23,768 are funded Gervais Road 140,741 171,000 30,259 from operating budget. Capital surplus of $54,027 used towards 2018 Road Program deficit.

Road Reconstruction: Project complete. All road costs have been allocated accordingly. Original estimate of works was $2,500,000 (based on full reconstruction). 2018 Grandview Beach & Paradise Point 1,698,712 1,573,895 (124,817) Budget of $1,573,895 based on contract award and available funding. Changes to the contract for additional drainage works and the upgrade from surface treatment to Asphalt account for the budget overage.

Project complete. Project costs have exceeded the approved budget by $351,000 ($57,000 2018 Road/Watermain Project 536,275 242,217 (294,058) apportioned to water). See report PW-2018-70 for details on overage and approval to amend budget.

General Government & Finance 11 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Roads Operations

Gravel Program: 132,105 124,020 (8,085) Project completed. Township labour and Fifth Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. equipment costs totalling $28,185 funded from Seventh Ave. - K St. to Arpin St. operating budget. Capital surplus of $20,100 used Arthur Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. towards funding the 2018 Roads Program deficit. Barnes Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. David Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. K St. - Seventh Ave. to Barnes Ave. Thorpe Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. Young Ave. - North Limit to Arpin St. McMann Sideroad - Highway 93 ti Wood Rd.

Crack Sealing Program: 24,797 25,000 203 Project complete.

Sidewalk : Project carried forward to 2019 with additional funding of $52,000 added to the budget (based on Seventh Street - McNicoll to Alberta 0,000 75 75,000 2018 tender results).

Streetlighting:

Project complete. Equipment - LED conversion 19,201 20,000 799

Roads Operations Total 2,551,830 2,268,008 (283,822)

General Government & Finance 12 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Parks & Recreation Software acquired. Implementation and training occurred in Spring 2018. Remaining funds carried Recreation Software - 2,712 2,712 forward to 2019 for system optimization.

Equipment: Project carried forward to 2019 with additional funding of $15,000 added to the budget (as per Penalty Boxes - 15,000 15,000 2018 quotations received).

3/4 Ton Van 37,915 38,000 85 Purchases completed under budget. Trade in value Riding Lawn Mower 16,074 18,000 1,926 of $6,318 received reduced overall cost.

T rail Bridges: Project substantially complete in 2017. Final Hogg River Bridge 2,406 - (2,406) review costs from Burnside.

Buildings: Project is within updated budget of $150,000 as per report PW-2018-50 (contract award). Project to be completed in Spring of 2019. 2019 budget carry Albert Street Washroom 108,014 103,500 (4,514) forward required.

Park Improvements: Budget will carry over to 2019 and be used towards the list of items identified by the MacKenzie Beach Park 254 110,000 109,746 MacKenzie Beach Improvement Committee. 2019 Budget based on Township funding of $82,500 plus $24,957 raised through community Fundraising/Donations.

Tree Replacement (Emerald Ash Borer) 763 5,000 4,237 Purchases complete for 2018.

General Government & Finance 13 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation Parks & Recreation

3,447 Oakwood Park - Ball Diamond Refurbishment 3,500 53 Fence work completed. Incentive of $8,250 to be received from NewMarket-Tay Power, reducing the net cost to Oakwood Park - Lighting Retro-fit. Ball diamond 20,112 5,000 (15,112) the municipality to $11,862. Budget overage and rink. reported GGF-2018-34.

Patterson Park - Pavilion 8,282 5 ,000 (3,282) Project complete.

Waverley Park - Ball Diamond Refurbishment 5,990 10,000 4,010 Project complete.

First Avenue Trail 94,011 90,000 (4,011) Project complete. Pedestrian handrails installed at an additional cost of $3,700.

Land Improvements: Project complete. Ground prep work (gravel base) Port McNicoll Community Centre - Resurface 38,741 30,000 (8,741) needed much more material than originally Parking Lot anticipated.

Total Parks 336,008 435,712 99,704

General Government & Finance 14 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation

Waste Water

General Equipment:

Capital Contingency Allowance ( Pumps, Blowers etc.) 18,347 20,000 1,653 Purchases complete.

Collection System First Avenue Sewage Lift Station 12,675 40,000 27,325 Project Completed under budget.

Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant: Septage Receiving - 70,000 70,000 Project carried forward to 2019. SCADA Upgrade - 35,000 35,000

Victoria Harbour Wastewater Treatment Plant : Project Completed under budget. Refurbish Aeration Tanks 14,142 40,000 25,858 Project has not been completed, nor has it been carried forward to 2019. After further consideration it has been determined that there is not enough available real estate at that location to allow for Equipment & Vehicle Storage Building - 100,000 100,000 an additional building used for storing vehicles.

Project contingent on grant funding. To date no Paradise Point Grandview Beach Servicing - 14,600,000 14,600,000 grant funding has been awarded.

Total Waste Water 45,164 14,905,000 14,859,837

General Government & Finance 15 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation

Water

Rope Water Treatment Plant: Project to be carried forward to 2019. Retro-fit high lift pump suctions 1,392 25,000 23 ,608

Distribution System: Project complete. Project costs have exceeded the approved budget by $351,000 ($294,000 104,990 47,806 (57,184) apportioned to roads). See report PW-2018-70 for details on overage and approval to ammend budget. 2017/2018 Watermain and Road Project

Project complete. Contractor rock claim is outstanding. Total project funding was outlined in reports PW-2017-68 and PW-2017-74. Project budget was reduced for 2018 (in error) to Paradise Point Grandview Beach 4,078,992 2,883,909 (1,195,083)construction contract only net of on property costs recoverable. Additional funding from the PP/GB grant and the Water Reserve needed to cover project related costs.

Water Total 4,185,374 2,956,715 (1,228,659)

General Government & Finance 16 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

TOWNSHIP OF TAY 2018 CAPITAL COST ANALYSIS

Total Capital Cost to Dec 2018 Budget Variance 31, 2018 Explanation

Planning & Development

No Capital 0

T otal Planning & Development 0 0 0

General Government & Finance 17 March 13, 2019 Report No. GGF-2019-20

February 20, 2019

The Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queens’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1

Dear Premier Ford:

Re: Public and Environmental Health Implications of Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018

On behalf of the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit (SMDHU) Board of Health, I am writing to express concern about the Government of Ontario’s decision to enact Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018.

We appreciate the intention to enhance employment opportunities throughout Ontario, and recognize good quality employment as a key element which influences health. Individuals who are unemployed, have precarious employment, or experience poor working conditions are at higher risk of stress, injury, high blood pressure and heart disease. However, the proposed bill will amend a number of acts and regulations intended to protect and promote public and environmental health.

In consideration of the proposed amendments, Bill 66 was assessed by SMDHU staff for implications to public and environmental health. We are apprehensive of unintended negative consequences which may arise from the implementation of this bill. The attached appendices outline concerns related to Schedule 3 (Appendix 1) and Schedule 5 (Appendix 2). Schedule 10 (Appendix 3) is also included, though the Board of Health is aware of media reports and social media remarks made by Honourable Minister Clark indicating “when the legislature returns in February, (the Government) will not proceed with Schedule 10 of the Bill.” This is welcomed, however, from our assessment of Bill 66 as it is presently written, its implementation to amend and repeal current legislation will potentially result in:

• Negative impacts to Ontario’s natural and built environment; • Degradation of important water sources; • Decreased preservation of greenspaces including agricultural lands, forests, parks and natural heritage features; • Decreased opportunities for physical activity; • Impacts to child safety; and • Increased risk of the spread of infectious diseases.

We request the government consider the impacts on the public health and safety of residents of Ontario prior to Bill 66 proceeding through the legislative process. We thank you for the opportunity to provide comment and your consideration of our feedback.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL Signed By:

Anita Dubeau Chair, Board of Health

AD:BA:cm cc. Honorable Christine Elliot, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Honorable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs Honorable Lisa Thompson, Minister of Education Honorable Rod Phillips, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Dr. David Williams, Chief Medical Officer of Health Members of Provincial Parliament for Simcoe and Muskoka Ontario Boards of Health Ms. Loretta Ryan, Association of Local Public Health Agencies Association of Municipalities of Ontario Ontario Public Health Association Members of Provincial Parliament Municipal Councils Central Local Health Integration Network North Simcoe Muskoka Local Health Integration Network

Appendix 1: Concerns and considerations related to Schedule 3 – Ministry of Education

SMDHU recognizes the efforts to enhance child care availability to families by increasing the total number of children under the age of two that can be cared for by home child care providers. Though evidence on optimal infant to caregiver ratios is inconclusive, the current limits in Child Care and Early Year’s Act, 2014, were chosen to ensure child safety1. We urge the government to evaluate the effects of this legislation on child safety and developmental outcomes if implemented. The proposed changes will not adequately address issues of access, affordability, and quality child care for families. Similar to our high quality education system, a child care strategy that prioritizes accessibility, affordability and quality is best addressed through a government system that ensures universal access to high quality care.

In addition, there may be implications to infection prevention and control due to the proposed amendment to paragraph 4 subsection 6 (4) of the Child Care and Early Years Act, 2014, which recommends the reduction of the age restriction from six years of age to four for registration in authorized recreation and skill building programs. Authorized recreational and skill building programs are not proactively inspected for food safety nor infection prevention and control by local public health units. With immunization follow-up doses for several diseases (e.g. measles, pertussis, and chickenpox) not occurring until a child is between 4 – 6 years, coupled with the potential for decreased hygienic practices and larger numbers of children congregating in one location2, there is the potential for the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases. Facilities that are not required to be inspected may not have the administrative (e.g. policies on when to exclude ill children) or physical (e.g. appropriate disinfectants) infrastructure to prevent infections. By lowering the age from six years to four, a potential increased infectious disease risk will occur for children 4-6 years attending these programs.

1 Ontario Ombudsman. 2014. Ombudsman Report: “Careless about Childcare” Investigation into how the Ministry of Education responds to complaints and concerns relating to unlicensed daycare providers .Available at: www.ombudsman.on.ca/Files/sitemedia/Documents/Investigations/SORT%20Investigations/Careless AboutChildCareEN-2.pdf 2 Canadian Paediatric Society. 2015. Well Beings: A Guide to Health in Child Care – 3rd edition. Appendix 2: Concerns and considerations related to Schedule 5 - Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks

The purpose of the Toxics Reductions Act (TRA) is to prevent pollution and protect human health and the environment, through reducing the use and creation of toxic substances within Ontario. While SMDHU supports efforts to avoid duplication of existing provincial and federal regulations, it is important to recognize the need to reduce the availability of toxic substances within Ontario. Existing federal requirements through the National Pollutant Release Inventory and the Chemical Management Plan have limitations to supporting further reduction of toxic substances that the province of Ontario hoped to address. The TRA can provide important economic benefits which lead to potential cost savings, creating new markets, and supporting employee health and safety. Similar legislation has shown to be effective in other jurisdictions in the United States that have required toxic reduction plans. Thus, SMDHU encourages the province to not eliminate the TRA, but to evaluate more effective opportunities for toxics reduction in Ontario that can support creating healthy environments while reducing barriers for business Appendix 3: Concerns and considerations related to Schedule 10 - Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing

The Planning Act and associated provincial regulations support effective planning, by ensuring development meets community needs, allows for sustainable economic growth, while protecting green spaces such as agricultural lands, forests, parks and natural heritage features which provide multiple health, economic and environmental benefits. The health benefits of well-designed communities based on provincial policies include better air quality, protected drinking water supplies, availability of locally grown foods, reduced urban heat islands, increased climate resiliency, mitigation of vector-borne diseases, increased opportunities for physical activity, general wellbeing and lower health care costs. Conservation of natural heritage features such as the Greenbelt addresses climate change mitigation (carbon sequestration) and adaptation (mitigating flood risks). For example, the Greenbelt actively stores carbon, with an estimated value of $4.5 billion over 20 years; annual carbon sequestration is valued at 10.7 million per year1. Benefits of greenspaces are communicated within the ‘Preserving and Protecting our Environment for Future Generations: a Made in Ontario Environment Plan’ which identifies the government’s commitment to protect the Greenbelt for future generations2.

SMDHU is concerned that the proposed amendment to the Planning Act will allow the use of Open for Business planning by-laws to permit the use of these important lands for alternative purposes without adhering to existing local planning requirements, such as official plans. Employment land needs are explicitly identified within local planning documents, and thus the use of the by-law will compromise long-term planning decisions. While the by-law may provide short-term economic benefit through the expansion of employment lands, this will be at the expense of long-term, sustainable economic development and protection of green space currently prescribed by the Planning Act.

In addition, Bill 66 allows municipalities to bypass important environmental legislation and discount protections for clean water and environmentally sensitive areas across Ontario. After the events of 2000 in Walkerton, where seven people died and thousands were ill3, Ontario put legislation in place to protect the over 80% of Ontarians who get their drinking water from municipal sources. The Clean Water Act, which directly addresses 22 of the 121 recommendations made following the Walkerton Inquiry, supports the adoption of a watershed based planning process, and serves as the instrument for the creation of source water protection plans.

Current legislation protects drinking water sources and greenspace. The changes proposed in Bill 66 will weaken a number of noteworthy acts including the Clean Water Act, the Great Lakes Protection Act, the Lake Simcoe Protection Act, the Greenbelt Act, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, and the Places to Grow Act. Currently these acts prevail in the case of conflict between a municipal plan and the noted act; under the proposed changes this would no longer be the case.

1 Tomalty, R. 2012. Carbon in the Bank: Ontario’s Greenbelt and its role in mitigating climate change. [Vancouver]: David Suzuki Foundation 2 Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. 2018. Preserving and protecting our environment for future generations: A Made-in-Ontario environment plan. [Toronto]: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. 3 Walkerton Inquiry (Ont.) and Dennis R. O’Connor. 2002. Report of the Walkerton Inquiry: A strategy for safe drinking water. [Toronto]: Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Notably, Section 39 of the Clean Water Act currently requires all Planning Act decisions to conform to policies in approved source protection plans that address significant drinking water threats prescribed by the Clean Water Acti. This important provision must remain applicable to all municipal planning and zoning decisions in order to protect public health and safety.

Bill 66 not only impacts drinking water, but also moves back progress made on protecting Lake Simcoe. The Lake Simcoe Protection Act was created to safeguard the watershed and protect our Great Lakes and Lake Simcoe from environmental damage. Lake Simcoe attracts 9 million visitors on an annual basis and accounts for approximately $1 billion dollars in annual spending. Due to the economic, environmental and health impacts that the Open for Business planning bylaw will present, we urge the government to remove the amendment to the Planning Act, from Bill 66. At minimum, public health authorities should be granted the ability under the Planning Act to review and comment on open for business bylaw applications, due to potential risk and hazards to health and for the protection and promotion of public health and safety.

i Threats identified in the act include landfills, sewage systems, and the storage or handling of fuel, fertilizers, manure, pesticides, road salt, organic solvents and other substances on lands near wells or surface water intake pipes used by municipal drinking water systems

Public Works Committee March 13, 2019

Agenda

1. Call to Order:

2. Reports of Municipal Officials: 2.1 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-14 Re: Monthly Activity Report Public Works Department 2.2 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-17 Re: Double Surface Treatment and Gravel Rehabilitation 2.3 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-20 Re: Contract 2019-03 Propane Powered Ice Resurfacer 2.4 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-21 Re: 2018 Rope Drinking Water System Annual Report 2.5 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-22 Re: 2018 Tay Area Drinking Water System Annual Report 2.6 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-23 Re: 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report 2.7 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-24 Re: 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report 2.8 Report from the Director of Public Works Report No. PW-2019-25 Re: Tay Township Local Climate Change Action Plan 2.9 Report from the Water/Wastewater Superintendent Report No. PW-2019-16 Re: Monthly Activity Report – Water Wastewater Operations 2.10 Report from the Manager of Roads & Fleet Report No. PW-2019-18 Re: Monthly Activity Report Roads & Fleet 2.11 Report from the Manager of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Report No. PW-2019-19 Re: Monthly Activity Report – Parks, Recreation & Facilities

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Committee Agenda

3. Other Business: 3.1 Verbal Report from Councillor Warnock Re: Boat Launch & Non-resident Parking Pass 3.2 Correspondence from the Portarama Committee Re: Request Use of ATV’s on Specific Roads during Soapbox Derby 3.3 Correspondence from the Royal Canadian Legion Re: Flooding of Branch 523 RCL Victoria Harbour

4. Items for Information: 4.1 Correspondence from a Resident Re: Street Lighting for Bourgeois Beach Road 4.2 Email from the Director of Public Works Re: Reply to Questions - Natural Gas to Rural Areas

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Committee Agenda

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-14

Report Title: Monthly Activity Report Public Works Department

ORIGIN Director of Public Works for the period from February 6 to March 5, 2019.

ROADS/PARKS  Road program options  Tender / proposal preparation, review, opening and reporting (ice resurfacer, road program, gravel program)  Load Restriction website update  Streetlight program discussion  Maintenance tender review (fuel, line painting)

WATER/WASTEWATER OPERATIONS  Tay Area Water Treatment Plant – reporting discussion with Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks  Victoria Harbour WWTP headworks HVAC discussion  Grandview Beach and Paradise Point: contract issues and mediation; funding follow-up  Tay Area WTP – inspection review

DEVELOPMENT  Lot grading process review  Victoria Woods – security reductions; Phase 4 review  Oakwood Seniors Residence site plan review  5 Fallowfield site plan review

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-14

GENERAL  Consultant selection review and report  Request for Proposal preparation  Summer student resume review  Climate Change Action Plan review and report

MEETINGS  Department Heads’ meetings  Public Works Mangers’ meetings  Committee of All Council and Council

Prepared By: Date Prepared: March 5, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-14

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No: PW-2019-17

Report Title: Double Surface Treatment and Gravel Rehabilitation

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PW-2019-17 regarding Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal contract 2019-04, and Gravel Rehabilitation contract 2019-06, be received;

And that the Council of the Township of Tay accepts the Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal tender low bid from Duncor Enterprises Inc. in the amount of $291,388.50 plus HST;

And that the Council of the Township of Tay accepts the Gravel Rehabilitation tender low bid from Dufferin Aggregates in the amount of $168,913.00 plus HST;

And that staff be directed to prepare the by-law authorizing the execution of the contract between the Township of Tay and Duncor Enterprises Inc. for the Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal;

And that staff be directed to prepare the by-law authorizing the execution of the contract between the Township of Tay and Dufferin Aggregates for the Gravel Rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Included in the 2019 Capital Budget are funds for Road Resurfacing and the Gravel Program. The Public Works Department has invited bids from suppliers through a competitive tender process for the supply and placement of double surface treatment and slurry seal as well as the supply of gravel for the Township’s gravel program.

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-17

The tenders were advertised on Biddingo and the Township website. The tender closed on March 1, 2019 at 2:00 pm. At that time there were two bids received for Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal and four bids received for Gravel Rehabilitation. The bids were opened by the Director of Finance, the Director of Public Works, the Administrative Assistant for the Roads/Parks Operations and the Manager of Roads and Fleet.

The roads to receive Gravel and Surface Treatments are:

Surface Road Name From To Gravel Treatment Connors Crt Rosemount Rd South Limit X

Granny White SR Reeves Rd Newton St. X 1260m E of Granny White SR Newton St. X Newton St Rosemount Rd Trail (C.N.R) Vasey Road X 800m N of Wood Rd McMann SR X McMann SR Wood Rd Ebenezer SR. 800m N X

Wood Rd 2092 Wood Rd Forgets Rd. X 200m North of McMann Ron Jones Road X X Hogg Valley Road Side Road Forest Duck Bay Road Meadows Avenue Harbour X X Pkwy Old Ebenezer Side Penetanguishene Wood Road X Road Road 1850 Rumney Road Elliott Side Road metres X X South 1500 Gervais Road Vasey Road metres X X North

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-17

ANALYSIS:

The Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal bidders and their prices excluding HST are as follows:

Company Name Bid Price Meets Tender Requirements Duncor Enterprises Inc. $291,388.50 Yes Miller Paving Ltd. $336,307.50 Yes

Staff examined the bids in detail for proper documentation and pricing for arithmetical errors. All bids conform to the tender requirements.

Duncor Enterprises Inc., the low bidder, has the equipment, knowledge and experience to do this type of work. Township staff has spoken with Duncor Enterprises staff and they are aware of the scope of work and have no concerns. Township staff feels they are competent to complete this type of work.

The Gravel Rehabilitation bidders and their prices excluding HST are as follows:

Company Name Bid Price Meets Tender Requirements Dufferin Aggregates $168,085.50 Yes Robinson Haulage Inc. $175,431.00 Yes Duivenvoorden Haulage Ltd. $178,613.00 Yes Lafarge Canada Inc. $208,399.50 Yes

Staff examined the bids in detail for proper documentation and pricing for arithmetical errors. All bids conform to the tender requirements.

Dufferin Aggregates, the low bidder, has the equipment, knowledge and experience to do this type of work. Township staff has spoken with Dufferin Aggregates staff and they are aware of the scope of work and have no concerns. Township staff feels they are competent to complete this type of work.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT:

Due to the capital road resurfacing projects requiring the addition of gravel we included the gravel portion of the resurfacing project in the Gravel Rehabilitation tender.

Public Works 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-17

Road Resurfacing The table below provides the estimated project costs for 2019 capital resurface projects (Excluding First Avenue) using bid prices, where known (bold). The project cost will be well within the allocated budget. This is in- part due to lower than anticipated gravel costs. The 2019 Capital Budget for Road Resurfacing (Excluding First Avenue) is a total of $773,322.

It is noted that a separate tender was issued for the pulverization of various road sections. That tender is within the allocated budget.

Item Estimated Project Costs Surface Treat $194,922.00 Slurry Seal $96,466.50 Pulverize $30,702.00 Gravel $75,795.80 Fine Grade/Compact $32,000.00 Shouldering $52,000.00 Ditching and Drainage $80,000.00 Misc. & Testing (5%) $28,094.25 Contingency (15%) $84,282.75 Sub Total $674,262.00 HST (1.76%) $11,867.01 Total $686,129.01

From the above, the surface treat item and the slurry seal item represent the Duncor bid ($194,922.00 + $96,466.50 = $291,388.50).

Gravel Program The table below provides the estimated project costs for 2019 capital gravel program using bid prices, where known (bold). The project cost will be will within the allocated budget. The 2019 Capital Budget includes the gravel program for a total of $164,407. The budget allocation anticipated a greater distance of road than is required.

Items Estimated Project Cost Gravel $92,289.70 Fine Grade/Compact $32,000.00 Sub Total $124,289.70 HST (1.76%) $2,187.50 Total $126,477.20

From the above two tables, the two gravel items equal the Dufferin bid ($75,795.80 + $92,289.70 = $168,085.50).

Public Works 4 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-17

CONCLUSION:

It is recommended that Council accepts the low bid from Duncor Enterprises Inc. for Double Surface Treatment and Slurry Seal and that Council accepts the low bid from Dufferin Aggregates for the Gravel Rehabilitation. Staff will prepare the by-laws to authorize execution of these contract documents.

Prepared by: Lyell Bergstrome, Manager of Roads and Fleet

Recommended by: Date:

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed by: Date:

Robert Lamb Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 5 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-17

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-20

Report Title: Contract 2019-03 – Propane Powered Ice Resurfacer

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PW-2019-20 regarding Contract 2019-03 – One Propane Powered Ice Resurfacer be received;

And that the contract be awarded to Resurfice Corp. in the amount of $80,990.00 plus HST;

And that the required by-law authorizing execution of the agreement between the Township and Resurfice Corp. be approved.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The 2019 Capital Budget included an allocation to replace the 1990 Olympia Ice Resurfacer at the Tay Community Rink. In April 2018 the Township had Olympia (the manufacturer of our current unit) come to the Tay Community Rink after the operating season to do a ‘once over’ on our current unit. Their technician noted in their report that repairs that may be needed in the imminent future could include: complete replacement of the hydraulic system, a rebuilt sled, full exhaust system replacement and potentially an engine rebuild. The estimated cost of all these repairs would be in the $20,000 - $30,000 range. These factors supported the scheduled replacement of the unit in 2019.

_____ Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-20

ANALYSIS: A Request for Proposals document was created and posted to Biddingo. One proposal was received by closing time 2pm, Friday March 1, 2019. The proposal was reviewed by the Director of Public Works and the Manager of Parks, Recreation & Facilities. The result of the single proposal is listed below.

One Propane Powered Ice Resurfacer Proposal received from Total Price Remarks excluding taxes Resurfice Corp. $80,990.00 Meets RFP requirements Resurfice Corp. has worked well with the Township in the past and the current ice resurfacer unit at the Tay Community Rink was purchased through them in 2011.

It is worth noting that as part of this proposal the current ice resurfacer will be traded in. Resurfice Corp. has taken $1000 off their original list price ($81,990.00) for the trade-in unit.

As well, the proposal had a provisional section in which proponents could submit pricing for a refurbished unit. Resurfice Corp. noted that no refurbished units are available.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: The 2019 Capital Budget for the purchase of this unit is $80,000. The total cost including net HST is $83,433.02. The additional $3,433.20 will be funded from the Municipal Fleet and Equipment Reserve.

CONCLUSION: After reviewing the submitted bid it is recommended that the Township purchase a new 2020 Propane Powered Ice Resurfacer from Resurfice Corp.

Prepared By: Bryan Anderson, Manager of Parks, Recreation & Facilities

Recommended by: Date: March 5, 2019

Peter Dance, P. Eng. Director of Public Works

Reviewed By; Date: March 5, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

_____ Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-20

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-21

Report Title: 2018 Rope Drinking Water System Annual Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That Staff Report No. PW-2019-21 regarding the 2018 Rope DWS Annual Report be received;

And that the 2018 Rope Drinking Water System Annual Report be accepted By Council as required by Schedule 22 and Section 11 of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The 2018 Annual Report (attached) for Rope DWS has been prepared in accordance with both Schedule 22 and Section 11 of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

In this manner, the Summary Reports for Municipalities required by Schedule 22 and the Annual Reports required by Section 11 of Regulation 170/03 have been consolidated into a single document. This report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Township of Tay’s Drinking Water Systems on the Rope system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

ANALYSIS:

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-21

Environment Conservation and Parks and, drinking water regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. The report contains a summary of the quantities and flow rates of water supplied, including monthly averages and maximum daily flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact with this report.

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the 2018 Rope Drinking Water System Annual Report be accepted as a requirement under Reg. 170/03 and the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002.

Prepared By: Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-21

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

The Corporation of the Township of Tay

2018 Drinking Water Systems Annual Report

Rope D.W.S.

Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Operations Superintendent

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Table of Contents

Section 1 …………………………….………………..…….….… Reporting Requirements & Compliance Summary

Section 2 ……………………………………………………. Drinking Water System Description & Rated Capacity

Section 3 …………………………………………………………..….… Chemical Analyses & Sampling Requirements

Section 4 …………………………………………………………….….…………. Drinking Water System Flow Summary

Section 5 ……………………………………………………………………..…. Drinking Water System Chlorine Dosage

Section 6 ……………………………………………………………………..……………………………... Adverse Water Reports

Appendix A ……………………….………………………………………….……………………………………………Flow Summary

Appendix B ……………………………………………………………………………..………Annual Sampling Requirements

Appendix C ……………………….……………………………………………………..……..……………….………Chemical Usage

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 1

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS & COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Summary Reports for Municipalities

This 2018 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with both Schedule 22, section 10 (Small Municipal water systems) of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

In this manner, the Summary Reports for Municipalities required by Schedule 22 and the Annual Reports required by sections 10 of Regulation 170/03 have been consolidated into a single document. This Report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Township of Tay’s Drinking Water Systems on each system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

A summary of these Drinking Water Systems (DWS) is produced with the use of technical terms, some of which the reader may not be familiar with. It is recommended that the reader refer to the Technical Support Document for Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards, Objectives (ODWQS), and Guidelines. Within this document the reader will find information on provincial water quality standards, objectives and guidelines, rationale for monitoring, and a brief description of water quality parameters. The Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards (ODWQS) document can be found at the following website address: http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/14000/263450.pdf

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the Environment Conservation and Parks and drinking water regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. The report contains a summary of the quantities and flow rates of water supplied, including monthly averages and maximum daily flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 2

ROPE DRINKING WATER SYSTEM LOCATION, DESCRIPTION & RATED CAPACITY

PLANT LOCATION - 204 Ruta Rd, Waubaushene

DESCRIPTION The Rope Drinking Water System is categorized as a small municipal residential drinking water system. The system consists of 430 metres of 100mm & 150mm diameter PVC watermain, seven main isolation valves and four hydrants. Hydrants are used for maintenance only, and are not capable for firefighting purposes. There is no storage facilities associated with the distribution system and pressure for the system is maintained by three high lift pumps.

Drinking Water Licence No. 129-101 Drinking Water Permit No. 129-201 Financial Report 129-301A

Expiry Date: January 4, 2021

The Rope Drinking Water System maximum daily volume of treated water that flows from the treatment subsystem shall not exceed the rated capacity as follows;

Treatment System Rated Capacity Membrane Filtration System, each train 216 m3/day UV System, each unit 274 m3/day The Rope Drinking Water System maximum flow rate of water that flows into the treatment subsystem shall not exceed;

Treatment Subsystem Component Maximum Flow Rate Membrane Filtration System, each train 2.5 L/s (216 m3/day) UV System, each unit 3.2L/s (274 m3/day)

In 2018 the treated water maximum day was 58.8m3/day or 21.4% of the rated capacity (274m3/day).

92P-3074 PERMIT TO TAKE WATER GUIDELINES Expiry Date: March 16, 2022 2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

The Permit to Take Water allows the Township to remove a maximum of 273,866 L/Day (273.8m3/day). In 2018 the maximum day for taking water was 125.9m3/day which is 45.9% of the allowable/day which is higher than norm due to maintenance conducted at the plant.

In comparison, in 2017 the maximum day for taking water was 74m3/day which is 27% of the allowable/day. The maximum day for taking water increased significantly in 2018.

The Rope Drinking Water System continued to produce water of satisfactory quality in 2018. The descriptions below provided in Section 3 summarizes the parameters tested in the Rope DWS, and the reader is asked to consult Appendix B for a comprehensive summary of 2018 water quality.

The table below reflects a 5 year comparison of raw and treated water flows for the reader’s information. No significant changes were observed.

Rope DWS ‐ Raw Water 5 Year Comparison Total Flow Year ‐ m3 Avg Monthly Total Flow m3 Max Monthly Flow m3 2018 14,726.14 1,227.18 125.90 2017 12,462.50 1,038.50 74.00 2016 13,704.20 1,142.00 136.30 2015 14,278.70 1,189.90 84.90 2014 17,681.60 1,473.50 105.40 Rope DWS ‐ Treated Water 5 Year Comparison Total Flow Year ‐ m3 Avg Monthly Total Flow m3 Max Monthly Flow m3 2018 10,367.83 863.99 88.64 2017 9,179.80 765.00 58.80 2016 10,118.00 843.20 106.30 2015 10,688.70 890.70 90.20

2014 12,619.70 1,051.60 65.80

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 3

Chemical Analysis & Sampling Requirements Summary In-House Analyses

The Rope DWS employs an extensive in-house testing program which includes analyses of water quality indicators beyond that required by Ontario’s Safe Drinking Water Act. Such analyses are conducted on source, treated, and process water, and include testing for turbidity, colour, pH, temperature, alkalinity, aluminum, and residual free chlorine. Approximately 1566 routine independent in-house water quality tests were conducted with respect to this system in 2018.

Microbiological Analyses in 2018, as required by Schedule 10 of O. Reg. 170/03. These water samples were collected on a weekly basis, and included tests for E. coli, total coliforms, and heterotrophic plate counts. All routine treated samples tested were absent for E. coli and total coliform parameters.

Organic Parameters and Trihalomethanes Organic parameters are sampled on an annual basis in treated water in accordance with Schedules 13 and 24 of O. Reg. 170/03. These parameters include various acids, pesticides, herbicides, PCBs, volatile organics, and other organic chemicals. With respect to the Rope DWS, sampling for organic parameters was conducted in January 2018. The results of all organic parameter testing were below the lower detectable limits (with the exception of Trihalomethanes and HAA’s).

Trihalomethanes (THMs) are sampled on a quarterly basis from the farthest point in the Rope distribution system, in accordance with Schedule 13 of O. Reg. 170/03. Compliance with the provincial standard for trihalomethane concentrations is determined by calculating a running annual average (with a Maximum Acceptable Concentration of 0.100 mg/L or 100ug/L). In 2018, the running annual average was 94.67ug/L.

Haloacetic acids(HAA’s) are sampled on a quarterly basis from the nearest point in the Rope distribution system, in accordance with Schedule 13 of O. Reg. 170/03. Compliance with the provincial standard for Haloacetic acid concentrations is determined by calculating a running annual average (with a Maximum Acceptable Concentration of 0.080 mg/L or 80ug/L). In 2018, the running annual average was 59.15ug/L.

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Community Lead Sampling

Based on results of the community lead sampling program in 2012 and 2015, the Rope DWS qualified for reduced sampling in accordance with Schedule 15.1 of O. Reg. 170/03.

In 2018 we were required to sample for;  Alkalinity and pH each year summer and winter period from the distribution system.  One distribution location (Fire Hydrant/Blow-off)  December to April (winter period)  June to October (Summer period)

Rope DWS ‐ Lead Sampling 3 Year Comparison East Blow Off West Blow Off East Blow Off West Blow Off East Blow Off West Blow Off ph Alkalinity Lead 2018 Round 1 6.87 6.75 42.00 36.00 N/R N/R 2018 Round 2 7.38 41.20 N/R N/R 2017 Round 1 6.98 42.00 N/R N/R 2017 Round 2 7.80 7.78 32.00 46.00 N/R N/R 2016 Round 1 6.93 6.98 10.00 11.00 0.19 0.14 2016 Round 2 7.67 7.68 11.00 15.00 0.21 0.17 Min 6.87 6.75 10.00 11.00 0.19 0.14 Max 7.80 7.78 42.00 46.00 0.21 0.17 Avg 7.32 7.26 23.75 31.87 0.20 0.16

Round 1: Dec 15 ‐ Apr 14 Round 2: June 15 ‐ Oct 14

Samples within the last 3 years have met the Ministry requirements.

The Township has been directed from the M.E.C.P. to sample for pH and Alkalinity annually and for Lead every three years. Therefore, the Township will be required to sample for Lead and the above parameters in 2019.

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

UV Summary – Our minimum UV requirements of 40mj/cm2 was met for 2018.

Turbidity – Requirement 0.10NTU - 99% of the Time The minimum turbidity requirement of 0.10 NTU 99% was not met during the months of January on Train 1 and July on Train 2 due to problems with membrane strands which have since been repaired.

Rope D.W.S. M.O.E.C.C. REQUIREMENT TURBIDITY % NTU <0.1 ‐ 99% TIME Train 1Train 2 Jan 95% 100% Feb 99% 99% Mar 100% 100% Apr 100% 99% May 100% 99% June 100% 100% July 100% 94% Aug 100% 100% Sept 100% 100% Oct 100% 100% Nov 100% 100% Dec 100% 100% Average % To Date 99.47% 99.12%

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 4

Drinking Water System Flow Summary

2018 Flow – Treated Water

Throughout the reporting period, the Rope DWS supplied 10,367.8m3 of treated water to consumers. On an average day in 2018, 28.35m3 of treated water was supplied to the community. This average daily flow rate in 2018 represented 9.5% of the rated capacity of the Rope DWS (274 m3/day). The maximum daily flow rate in 2018 was 88.6m3/day, which represented 32% of the rated capacity of the Rope DWS. The maximum day flow was due to high usage on an extreme heat in the month of July 2018. The reader is asked to consult Appendix A for a complete summary of 2018 flow data.

TREATED WATER MONTHLY FLOW m3 RATED CAPACITY‐274m3/day

Rated Capacity Compared Rated Capacity Compared Min Tr 1 & 2Max Tr. 1 & 2Avg Tr. 1 & 2Total Flow to Avg Daily Flow to Max Daily Flow Jan 11.1 54.0 21.0 651.9 7.68% 19.69% Feb 16.0 30.1 21.6 604.5 7.88% 10.98% Mar 15.1 33.5 21.6 669.6 7.88% 12.21% Apr 13.3 24.7 20.6 617.3 7.51% 9.02% May 18.5 61.4 30.9 958.9 11.29% 22.39% June 21.3 45.9 35.4 1,062.5 12.93% 16.76% July 25.6 88.6 46.3 1,434.9 16.89% 32.35% Aug 30.4 65.1 44.4 1,376.4 16.20% 23.74% Sept 19.7 46.7 33.8 1,014.6 12.34% 17.04% Oct 14.2 37.6 24.0 742.9 8.75% 13.72% Nov 13.8 31.7 22.0 659.8 8.03% 11.55% Dec 12.1 30.7 18.5 574.7 6.77% 11.21% Yearly 11.1 88.6 28.35 10367.8 Max ‐ 17% Max ‐ 32%

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 5

Rope DWS Chlorine Dosage

Treatment Subsystem Minimum Guideline - >0.25

Rope DWS Treated Water Annual Chlorine Dosage 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec F/C Port (Avg) 1.26 1.26 1.19 1.17 1.12 0.97 1.01 1.05 1.11 0.99 1.10 1.10 F/C In‐Line (Avg) 1.25 1.27 1.16 1.14 1.10 0.95 0.96 1.01 0.98 0.91 1.13 1.07

Distribution System Minimum Guideline - >0.05

Rope DWS Distribution Water Annual Chlorine Dosage 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec F/C‐Port (Avg) 0.67 0.54 0.56 0.70 0.71 0.65 0.53 0.57 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.67

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Therefore, the DWS system met or exceeded the Ministry’s Minimum disinfection treatment requirements. 2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Section 6

Rope DWS Adverse Water Quality Reports There were two A.W.Q.I. reports during 2018.

July 3, 2018 the Township reported a Sodium sample of 21.1 mg/L which exceeded the limit of 21mg/L.

September 28, 2018 the Township reported No Pressure due to the high lift pump shut down for repairs.

Additional Reporting:

The Township advised the S.M.D.H.U. & M.O.E.C.C that the plant was not meeting the Turbidity requirement of 0.10 NTU- 99% of the time. It was noted that the plant was still achieving 4 log removal through UV which satisfied the guideline/requirement on the following dates:  January 12, 2018  February 13, 2018  August 21, 2018

Noted: No Log Removal Credit for Filter - UV Providing 4 Log Removal

The Township advised the S.M.D.H.U. & M.O.E.C.C that the plant did not meet the THM annual running average of 100% on the following quarterly sampling dates:  January 23, 2018 reported February 5, 2018 Quarterly Sample Result 132.0 - R/A 108.25  April 23, 2018 reported May 2, 2018 Quarterly Sample Result 109.0 - R/A 114.3

Boil Water Summary There were no Boil Water Reports for 2018.

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

OCCURRENCE# PLANTDATE OF PARAMETER SAMPLE RESULT UNIT ACTION CORRECTIVE RESOLUTION LOCATION REPORT(S) LOCATION MEASURE DESCRIPTION DATE

Occurence date: Month of December Rope DWS N/A Jan. 12 2018 TurbidityTreated 79.50% Percentage Monthly <0.1 LIMIT: NTU ‐99% Time Lead Hand advised MOECC of resultsJan 122018 2200011323 and, that we would not achieve our monthly turbidy average. No Log Removal Credit for Filter ‐ UV Providing 4 Log Removal

Occurence date: Month of January Rope DWS N/A Feb 5 2018 THM 108.25% Monthly Percentage LIMIT: 100 ug/L Feb 5 2018 2200011323 Dist Quarterly Sample 132.0 R/A 108.25 Emailed MOECC Inspector & SMDHU Occurence date: Month of January Rope DWS N/A Feb.13 2018 Turbidity 94.58% Monthly Percentage <0.1 LIMIT: NTU ‐99% Time Lead Hand advised MOECC of resultsFeb 132018 2200011323 Treated and, that we would not achieve our monthly turbidy average. No Log Removal Credit for Filter ‐ UV Providing 4 Log Removal Occurence date: Month of April Rope DWS N/A May 2 2018 THM 114.30% Monthly Percentage LIMIT: 100 ug/L May 2 2018 2200011323 Dist Quarterly Sample 109.0 R/A 114.3 Emailed MOECC Inspector & SMDHU ‐ 2C ‐ SAC

Rope DWS 140159 Resampled 25.6mg/L July 3 2018 2200011323 July 3 2018 Sodium Treated 21.1 mg/L Hand delivered notices to advise users with health risks for Sodium Aug 7 2018 Emailed to Advise MOECC Inspector & SMDHU Occurence date: Month of July Rope DWS Aug 21 2018 Turbidity Percentage 96.80% Monthly <0.1 LIMIT: NTU ‐99% Time Lead Hand advised MOECC of resultsAug 222018 N/A 2200011323 Treated and, that we would not achieve our monthly turbidy average. Emailed to Advise MOECC Inspector & SMDHU Loss of Water Pressure caused by high lift pump shut down for repair. Rope DWS Two valves shut down prior on Ruta Rd & Oak Rd. ‐ Flushed hydrant until 143275 2200011323Sept 28 2018 No Pressure Treated 0 mg/L Sept 282018 free chlorine residual 1.322 mg/L was achieved. Reported to: SMDHU & SAC 2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Appendix A

Flow Summary – Treated Water

ROPE WTP TREATED WATER MONTHLY 100.0 MIN/MAX/AVG FLOW m3 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec MIN 11.1 16.0 15.1 13.3 18.5 21.3 25.6 30.4 19.7 14.2 13.8 12.1 MAX 54.0 30.1 33.5 24.7 61.4 45.9 88.6 65.1 46.7 37.6 31.7 30.7 AVG 21.0 21.6 21.6 20.6 30.9 35.4 46.3 44.4 33.8 24.0 22.0 18.5

Flow Summary – Raw Water

2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Appendix B

Annual Sampling Requirements

Schedule 23/24

Rope DWS Water Quality Reporting Small Municipal Residential DWS #2220011323 Period Reporting: January 1, 2018 ‐ December 31, 2018 Report Available: On Website or In Office Microbiological Parameters 2018 ODWQS Parameter Units No. of Samples Min Max ODWQS Compliant Ecoli-Raw MPN -100mL Continuous (52) 046N/A  Ecoli-Treated p/a 100 mL Continuous (52) 0 n/a Not Detected  Ecoli-Dist p/a 100 mL Continuous (104) 0 n/a Not Detected  Ttl Coliform - Raw MPN -100mL Continuous (52) 1 4200 N/A  Ttl Coliform - Treated p/a 100 mL Continuous (52) 0 n/a  Ttl Coliform - Dist p/a 100 mL Continuous (104) 0 n/a Not Detected  HPC - Treated CFU/mL Continuous (52) 097  HPC - Dist CFU/mL Continuous (104) 0 1180  ODWQS - Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standard Chemical & Physical Parameters 2018 (In-House) ODWQS Parameter Units No. of Samples Min Max Avg ODWQS Compliant Turbidity Filter - Raw NTU Continuous 0.184 9.50 2.00 5  Turbidity Filter - Treated NTU Continuous 0.000 0.700 0.00 5  Res. Free Chlorine - Treated (Port) mg/L Continuous 0.120 2.20 1.12 4  Res. Free Chlorine - Treated (I/L) mg/L Continuous 0.340 2.10 1.11 4  Residual Free Chlorine-Dist mg/L Continuous 0.120 2.01 0.63 4  pH - Treated pH units Continuous 6.000 8.79 7.26 6.5-8.5  Total Alkalinity - Raw mg/L CaCO3 Continuous 14.000 81.60 65.7 120 Total Alkalinity - Treated mg/L CaCO3 Continuous 13.600 60.00 33.9 120  Residual Aluminum - Raw mg/L Continuous 0.000 4.90 1.0 0.1  Residual Aluminum - Treated mg/L Continuous 0.000 0.20 0.1 0.1  The Township does not fluoridate the drinking water. Port ‐Portable I/L ‐ In‐Line

Additional Testing and Sampling Carried out in accordance with an approval or other legal instrument. ODWQS Parameter Units No. of Samples Result ODWQS Compliant Suspended Solids mg/L Continuous 3.9 15 

Inorganic Parameters-2018 Annual Sample Taken: January 23 2018 Treated Result ODWQS Parameter Unit Jan 23 2018 ODWQS Compliant Antimony ug/L 0.040 6  Arsenic ug/L 0.200 25  Barium ug/L 18.20 1000  Boron ug/L 11.00 5000  Cadmium ug/L 0.016 5  Chromium ug/L 0.040 50  *Lead ug/L 0.010 10  Mercury ug/L 0.010 1  Selenium ug/L 0.050 10  Sodium mg/L 19.70 20  Uranium ug/L 0.004 20  Fluoride mg/L 0.060 1.5  Nitrite mg/L 0.003 1  Nitrate mg/L 0.073 10  Nitrite+Nitrate mg/L 0.073 10 

Organic Parameters-2018 Annual Sample Taken: January 23 2018 Treated Result ODWQS Parameter Unit Jan 23 2018 ODWQS Compliant Alachlor ug/L 0.02 5  Atrazine ug/L 0.01 n/a  Atrazine+N-dealkylated metobolites ug/L 0.01 5  Azinphos-methyl ug/L 0.05 20  Benzene ug/L 0.32 1  Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 0.004 0.01  Bromacetic Acid ug/L 6.00 n/a  Bromodichloromethane ug/L 8.10 n/a  Bromoform ug/L 0.34 n/a  Bromoxynil ug/L 0.33 5  Carbaryl ug/L 0.05 90  Carbofuran ug/L 0.01 90  Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L 0.16 2  Chlorpyrifos ug/L 0.02 90  Chloroform ug/L 0.29 n/a  Chloracetic Acid ug/L 6.00 n/a  1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.41 200  1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.36 5  1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 0.35 5  1,1-Dichloroethylene  ug/L 0.33 14 (vinylidene chloride) 2-4 Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.15 900  2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) ug/L 0.19 100  Desethyl atrazine ug/L 0.01 n/a  Diazinon ug/L 0.02 20  Dibromoacetic Acid ug/L 2.00 n/a  Dibromochlormethane mg/L 0.47 n/a  Dicamba ug/L 0.20 120  Dichloromethane ug/L 0.35 50  Dichloracetic Acid ug/L 32.4 n/a  Organic Parameters continued -2018 Annual Sample Taken: January 23 2018 Diclofop-methyl ug/L 0.40 9  Dimethoate ug/L 0.03 20  Diquat ug/L 1.00 70  Diuron ug/L 0.03 150  Glyphosate ug/L 1.00 280  Malathion ug/L 0.02 190  Metolachlor ug/L 0.01 50  Metribuzin ug/L 0.02 80  Monochlorobenzene ug/L 0.30 80  Paraquat ug/L 1.00 10  Pentachlorophenol ug/L 0.15 60  Phorate ug/L 0.01 2  Picloram ug/L 1.00 190  Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) ug/L 0.02 3  Prometryne ug/L 0.03 1  Simazine ug/L 0.01 10  THM (Annual Average) ug/L 94.7 100  Terbufos ug/L 0.01 1  Tetrachloroethylene ug/L 0.35 30  2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 0.20 100  Triallate ug/L 0.01 230  Trichloroethylene ug/L 0.44 5  2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.25 5  Trifluralin ug/L 0.02 45  Trichloracetic Acid ug/L 55.00 n/a  Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) ug/L 93.4  Annual Average n/a Vinyl Chloride ug/L 0.17 1  MCPA mg/L 0.00012 0.1  The Township does not fluoridate the drinking water.

Chemicals used over reporting period: Stern‐pac is used from January through to October and aluminum suphate was used as the coagulant for the balance of the year. Sodium Hypochlorite is used as the seconday disinfectant. Sulfuric acid is currently used for pH adjustment when necessary. A change in chemical dosage is typical during change in raw water quality however no abnormal usages were exoerienced. Alum was used all year as well. 2018 Annual Report Rope Drinking Water System

Appendix C

Chemical Usage

Stern Pac kg Rope DWS 1059.78

The annual average coagulant dosage was 416L per month.

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-22

Report Title: 2018 Tay Area Drinking Water System Annual Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That Staff Report No. PW-2019-22 regarding the 2018 Tay Area DWS Annual Report be received;

And that the 2018 Tay Area Drinking Water System Annual Report be accepted By Council as required by Schedule 22 and Section 11 of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The 2018 Annual Report (attached) for Tay Area DWS has been prepared in accordance with both Schedule 22 and Section 11 of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

In this manner, the Summary Reports for Municipalities required by Schedule 22 and the Annual Reports required by Section 11 of Regulation 170/03 have been consolidated into a single document. This report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Township of Tay’s Drinking Water Systems on the Tay Area system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

ANALYSIS:

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-22

Environment Conservation and Parks and, drinking water regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. The report contains a summary of the quantities and flow rates of water supplied, including monthly averages and maximum daily flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact with this report.

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the 2018 Tay Area Drinking Water System Annual Report be accepted as a requirement under Reg. 170/03 and the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002.

Prepared By: Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-22

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

The Corporation of the Township of Tay

2018 Drinking Water Systems Annual Report

Tay Area D.W.S.

Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Operations Superintendent

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Table of Contents

Section 1 …………………………………… Reporting Requirements & Compliance Summary

Section 2 ……………………………… Drinking Water System Description & Rated Capacity

Section 3 …………………………………………… Chemical Analyses & Sampling Requirements

Section 4 ……………………………………….……………. Drinking Water System Flow Summary

Section 5 …………………………………………….……. Drinking Water System Chlorine Dosage

Section 6 ………………………………………………………………………………. Adverse Water Reports

Appendix A ……………………….…………………………………………………………..……Flow Summary

Appendix B ……………………….………………………………………Annual Sampling Requirements

Appendix C ……………………….……………………………………………………….………Chemical Usage

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 1

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS & COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Summary Reports for Municipalities

This 2018 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with both Schedule 22, section 11 (Large Municipal water systems) of Ontario Regulation 170/03.

In this manner, the Summary Reports for Municipalities required by Schedule 22 and the Annual Reports required by sections 10 and 11 of Regulation 170/03 have been consolidated into a single document. This Report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Township of Tay’s Drinking Water Systems on each system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

A summary of these Drinking Water Systems (DWS) is produced with the use of technical terms, some of which the reader may not be familiar with. It is recommended that the reader refer to the Technical Support Document for Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards, Objectives (ODWQS), and Guidelines. Within this document the reader will find information on provincial water quality standards, objectives and guidelines, rationale for monitoring, and a brief description of water quality parameters. The Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards (ODWQS) document can be found at the following website address: http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/14000/263450.pdf

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and drinking water regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. The report contains a summary of the quantities and flow rates of water supplied, including monthly averages and maximum daily flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 2

TAY AREA DRINKING WATER SYSTEM LOCATION, DESCRIPTION & RATED CAPACITY

LOCATION OF PLANT 45 Lighthouse Crescent, Victoria Harbour

DESCRIPTION The Tay Area Drinking Water System is categorized as a large municipal residential drinking water system. The system serves an estimated population of 8000 for the communities of Victoria Harbour, Port McNicoll and Waubaushene. The facility is rated at 10,065 cubic meters/day.

The distribution system is comprised of many various materials including ductile iron, cast iron, polyvinyl chloride and galvanized steel. The system consists of 77,966 meters of distribution watermain, 336 hydrants and 400 isolation valves.

The primary disinfection system is achieved in two stages the first through UV irradiation and secondly through chlorine and chlorine contact time. The Tay Area Drinking Water System consists of three booster stations and three storage facilities one in each of the communities.

Drinking Water License No. 102-102 Drinking Water Permit No. 102-202 Financial Report 102-301A Expiry Date: Jan 4, 2021

The Tay Area Drinking Water System shall not be operated to exceed the maximum flow rated capacity of 10,065m3/day as outlined in the Drinking Water System Permit unless where necessary for fighting a large fire or maintenance of the drinking water system. Treatment Subsystem Rated Capacity Tay Area Drinking Water System 10,065 m3/day

In September 2018 the drinking water system treated water maximum daily flow was 5170m3/day which represents 51% of the rated capacity (10,065m3/day).

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

4221-9QDGS4 PERMIT TO TAKE WATER GUIDELINES The Permit to Take Water allows the Township to remove 10,627.2m3/day. (Maximum Amount Taken Per Day – 10,627,200 Litres/Day)

In September 2018 the plants maximum day for taking water was 5652m3/d which represents 53% of the PTTW allowable which in comparison to 2017 the maximum day for taking water was 3656m3/day which is 36% of the allowable/day but is relative to 2015 and 2016.

The Tay Area Drinking Water System continued to produce water of satisfactory quality in 2018. Section 3 provides brief summaries of the parameters tested in the Tay Area DWS, and the reader is asked to consult Appendix B for a comprehensive summary of 2018 water quality.

Tay Area DWS ‐ Raw Water 5 Year Comparison

Total Flow Year ‐ m3 Avg Monthly Total Flow m3 Max Monthly Flow m3

2018 856,964.00 71,413.67 5,652.00 2017 743,687.00 61,974.00 3,656.00 2016 895,781.00 74,648.00 6,011.00 2015 869,420.00 72,452.00 5,125.00 2014 999,513.00 83,293.00 5,280.00 Tay Area DWS ‐ Treated Water 5 Year Comparison Total Flow Year ‐ m3 Avg Monthly Total Flow m3 Max Monthly Flow m3 2018 797,952.00 66,496.00 5,170.00 2017 712,228.00 59,352.00 3,622.00 2016 860,502.00 71,708.00 5,695.00 2015 769,052.00 64,088.00 4,055.00 2014 710,839.00 59,237.00 3,987.00

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 3

Chemical Analysis & Sampling Requirement Summary In-House Analyses - The Tay Area DWS employs an extensive in-house testing program which includes analyses of water quality indicators beyond that required by Ontario’s Safe Drinking Water Act. Such analyses are conducted on source, treated, and process water, and include testing for turbidity, colour, pH, temperature, alkalinity, aluminum, and residual free chlorine. Approximately 1700 routine independent in-house water quality tests were conducted with respect to this system in 2018.

Microbiological Analyses in 2018, as required by Schedule 10 of O. Reg. 170/03. These water samples were collected on a weekly basis, and included tests for E. coli, total coliforms, and heterotrophic plate counts. All routine treated samples tested were absent for E. coli and total coliform parameters.

Organic Parameters and Trihalomethanes - Organic parameters are sampled on an annual basis in treated water in accordance with Schedules 13 and 24 of O. Reg. 170/03. These parameters include various acids, pesticides, herbicides, PCBs, volatile organics, and other organic chemicals. With respect to the Tay Area DWS, sampling for organic parameters was conducted in January 2018. The results of all organic parameter testing were below the lower detectable limits (with the exception of Trihalomethanes and HAA’s).

Trihalomethanes (THMs) are sampled on a quarterly basis from the farthest point in the Tay Area distribution system, in accordance with Schedule 13 of O. Reg. 170/03. Compliance with the provincial standard for trihalomethane concentrations is determined by calculating a running annual average (with a Maximum Acceptable Concentration of 0.100 mg/L or 100 ug/L). In 2018, the running annual average was 61.5ug/L Haloacetic acids (HAA’s) are sampled on a quarterly basis from the nearest point in the Tay Area distribution system, in accordance with Schedule 13 of O. Reg. 170/03. Compliance with the provincial standard for Haloacetic acid concentrations is determined by calculating a running annual average (with a Maximum Acceptable Concentration of 0.080 mg/L or 80ug/L). In 2018, the running annual average was 20.73ug/L Microbiological Analyses are conducted on source, treated, and distribution system water as required by Schedule 10 of O. Reg. 170/03. Samples collected are tested for bacteriological analysis by an accredited laboratory.

UV Summary – Our minimum UV requirement of a minimum 40 mj/cm2 was met for 2018.

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Inorganic Parameters and Nitrate/Nitrite Inorganic parameters are sampled on an annual basis in treated water in accordance with Schedules 13 and 23 of O. Reg. 170/03. Inorganic sampling includes various parameters such as Antimony, Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury, and Uranium. With respect to the Tay Area DWS, required annual sampling for inorganic parameters was conducted in January, 2018.

Treated water is also tested for nitrate and nitrite concentrations on a quarterly basis in accordance with Schedule 13 of O. Reg. 170/03. There were no exceedance for any inorganic parameter in 2018.

Community Lead Sampling Based on results of the community lead sampling program in 2012 and 2015, the Tay Area DWS has qualified for reduced sampling in accordance with Schedule 15.1 of O. Reg. 170/03.

In 2018 we were required to sample for;  Alkalinity and pH each year summer and winter period from the Distribution system.  From Three Distribution points (Fire Hydrants)  December to April (winter period)  June to October (Summer period) Tay Area DWS ‐ Lead Sampling 3 Year Comparison VH Hydrant PM Hydramt W‐Hydrant VH Hydrant PM Hydramt W‐Hydrant VH Hydrant PM Hydramt W‐Hydrant pH Alkalinity Lead

2018 Round 1 6.62 6.69 6.60 70 68 68 N/R N/R N/R 2018 Round 2 7.39 7.33 7.28 70 69 65 N/R N/R N/R 2017 Round 1 6.92 7.16 7.33 64 68 76 N/R N/R N/R 2017 Round 2 7.06 7.04 7.12 64 66 66 N/R N/R N/R 2016 Round 1 7.11 7.08 7.02 61 63 71 1.38 1.28 0.11 2016 Round 2 7.75 7.74 7.73 62 61 62 0.92 0.17 0.06

Min 6.62 6.69 6.60 61.00 61.00 62.00 0.92 0.17 0.06 Max 7.75 7.74 7.73 70.00 68.80 76.00 1.38 1.28 0.11 Avg 7.14 7.17 7.18 65.10 65.80 67.97 1.15 0.73 0.09

Round 1: Dec 15 ‐ Apr 14 Round 2: June 15 ‐ Oct 14 N/R – Not Required to Sample Samples within the last 3 years have met the Ministry requirements.

The Township has been directed from the M.E.C.P. to sample for pH and Alkalinity annually and for Lead every three years. Therefore, the Township will be required to sample for Lead and the above parameters in 2019.

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Turbidity –

The turbidity requirement of 0.10 NTU for 99% of the time was met as per Ministry guidelines.

TAY AREA DWS M.E.C.P. REQUIREMENT NTU 0.10‐99% time NTU 0.30‐95% time PALL SYSTEM ECODYNE TURBIDITY PERCENTAGE OVERALL % MONTH RACK 1RACK 2RACK 4RACK 1,2,4 ECODYNE TURBIDTY Jan 99.97 99.70 100.00 99.89 n/a Feb 99.97 99.96 99.96 99.96 n/a Mar 99.97 99.95 100.00 99.97 n/a Apr 99.98 99.96 99.98 99.97 n/a May 99.97 99.91 99.96 99.95 n/a June 99.99 99.80 99.96 99.92 n/a July 99.99 99.93 99.97 99.96 n/a Aug 99.99 99.89 99.95 99.94 n/a Sept 99.98 99.97 99.92 99.95 n/a Oct 99.94 99.94 99.95 99.94 n/a Nov 99.91 99.86 99.93 99.89 n/a Dec n/a Annual Avg % 99.97% 99.90% 99.96% 99.94% Not in Operation

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 4

Drinking Water System Flow Summary

2018 Flow – Treated Water Throughout the reporting period, the Tay Area DWS supplied 797,952m3 of treated water to consumers. On an average day in 2018, 2,182.60m3 of treated water was supplied to the community. This average daily flow rate in 2018 represented 38% of the rated capacity of the Tay Area WTP (10,065 m3/day). The maximum daily flow rate in 2018 was 5,170m3/day, which represented 51% of the rated capacity of the Tay Area WTP. The maximum day flow was due to high usage on an extreme heat day in September 2018. The reader is asked to consult Appendix A for a complete summary of 2018 flow data.

Treated Water Flow 2018

TAY AREA DWS TREATED WATER FLOW m3 RATED CAPACITY‐10,065m3/day Daily Flow Daily Flow Daily Flow Monthly Flow Rated Capacity Compared to Rated Capacity Compared to Min Max Avg Total Avg Daily Flow Max Daily Flow Jan 1,315 2,026 1,647 51,055 16% 20% Feb 1,304 1,899 1,580 44,232 16% 19% Mar 1,275 2,069 1,534 47,552 15% 21% Apr 1,269 2,117 1,634 49,023 16% 21% May 1,677 3,323 2,335 72,398 23% 33% June 1,977 3,881 2,980 89,407 30% 39% July 2,094 4,141 3,066 95,031 30% 41% Aug 1,780 3,836 2,678 83,019 27% 38% Sept 1,786 5,170 2,796 83,866 28% 51% Oct 1,690 4,025 2,213 68,612 22% 40% Nov 1,621 2,296 1,826 54,794 18% 23% Dec 1,541 2,129 1,902 58,963 19% 21% Annual 1,269.00 5,170.00 2,182.60 797,952.00 Max ‐ 30% Max ‐ 51%

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 5 Tay Area DWS Chlorine Dosage

Treatment Subsystem MECP Minimum Free Chlorine Residual Guideline requirement of 0.25mg/L

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Distribution System M.E.C.P. Minimum Free Chlorine Residual Guideline requirement of 0.05 mg/L

Legend: W-B/S – Waubaushene Booster Station PM-B/S – Port McNicoll Booster Station VH-B/S – Victoria Harbour Booster Station F/C – Free Chlorine C’Meter - Colormeter

Therefore, the Tay Area Water system met or exceeded the Ministry’s Minimum chlorination requirements in 2018.

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Section 6

Tay Area DWS Adverse Water Quality Reports

There were four AWQI reports throughout 2018.

Three reports in April involved low chlorine on Easton Avenue in Port McNicoll. Staff flushed the main, sampled and monitored the situation and consulted with the S.M.D.H.U. and the M.O.E.C.C. regularly to resolve the issue.

One report in October which was for Low or No Chlorine due to a watermain break that affected the upper zone of Port McNicoll. A boil advisory was issued as stated below.

Boil Water Summary A precautionary boil water advisory was issued on October 2, 2018 due an emergency watermain break that affected the upper zone of Port McNicoll approx. 10-15 homes were affected. Hand delivered notices were supplied to residents affected.

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

DRINKING WATER SYSTEM ADVERSE AND/OR OTHER PROBLEM SUBMISSIONS 2018 TAY AREA D.W.S. #220001076

OCCURRENCE# PLANTDATE PARAMETER SAMPLE RESULT UNIT ACTION CORRECTIVE RESOLUTION LOCATION LOCATION MEASURE DESCRIPTION DATE

FLUSHED MAIN UNTIL RESIDUAL RESTORED

CONTINUALY MONITORED & SAMPLES TAKEN

TAY AREA AFTER FLUSHING: 0.32 FREE & 0.53 TOTAL APR 9 2018

AFTERFLUSHING NEAREST HOUSE: 0.48 FREE & 0.65 TOTAL 139051 9 2018 APRLOW CL2 AVE EASTON 0.02 MG/L SAMPLED: APR 9 2018

FLUSHED MAIN UNTIL RESIDUAL RESTORED

CONTINUALY MONITORED

139117 AFTER FLUSHING: 0.17 9AM FREE CL2 & 0.78 FREE CL2 AT 10AM APR 182018

AFTER FLUSHING ACHIEVED AT 1:25PM: 1.0 FREE & 1.16 TOTAL TAY AREA 17 APR2018 LOW CL2 AVE EASTON 0.03MG/L HYDRANT THEN SHUT DOWN & FLUSHING STOPPED

FLUSHED MAIN UNTIL RESIDUAL RESTORED

CONTINUALY MONITORED

LOW CL2 EASTON AVE 0.02 MG/L AFTERFLUSHING: UPSTREAM 310PM 0.70 TTL 0.58 FREE APR 232018

AFTER FLUSHING: DOWNSTREAM 2:550PM 0.35 FREE 139154 AREA TAY 20 APR2018 AUTOMATIC FLUSHER INSTALLED

WATERMAINBREAK IN DIST SYSTEM AFFECTING PORT MCNICOLL UPPER ZONE

NOTICES: ADVISEDRESIDENTS NO WATER PRESSURE ‐ OCT 2

143306 AREA TAY 2 OCT 2018 PRESSURE NO SYSTEM DIST NOTICES: ADVISED RESIDENTS BOIL WATER ADVISORY FOLLOWING REPAIR‐ OCT 3 OCT 6 2018

ISOLATED AREA, REPAIRED MAIN, FLUSHED, DISINFECTED & SAMPLED NOTICES: SAMPLES RETURNED CLEAR LIFTED BOIL ADVISORY OCT 6 2018

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Appendix A

Flow Summary – Treated Water

Flow Summary – Raw Water

2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Appendix B

Annual Sampling Requirements Schedule 23/24

Tay Area DWS Water Quality Reporting Large Municipal Residential DWS #220001076 Period Reporting: January 1, 2018 ‐ December 31, 2018 Report Available: On Website or In Office Microbiological Parameters 2018 ODWQS Parameter Units No. of Samples Min Max ODWQS Compliant Ecoli-Raw MPN -100mL Continuous (52) 046N/A  Ecoli-Treated p/a 100 mL Continuous (52) 00Not Detected  Ecoli-Dist p/a 100 mL Continuous (298) 00Not Detected  Ttl Coliform - R MPN -100mL Continuous (52) 1 4200 N/A  Ttl Coliform - T p/a 100 mL Continuous (52) 00Not Detected  Ttl Coliform - D p/a 100 mL Continuous (298) 00Not Detected  HPC - T CFU/mL Continuous (52) 097  HPC - D CFU/mL Continuous (298) 0 1180  ODWQS - Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standard R- Raw Water T-Treated Water D-Distribution Water

Chemical & Physical Parameters 2018 (In-House) ODWQS Parameter Units No. of Samples Min Max Avg ODWQS Compliant Turbidity Filter-R NTU Continuous 0.064 9.999 1.613 5  Turbidity Filter-T Rack 1 NTU Continuous 0.004 1.998 0.022 5  Turbidity Filter-T Rack 2 NTU Continuous 0.003 1.999 0.022 5  Turbidity Filter-T Rack 4 NTU Continuous 0.007 2.000 0.024 5  Residual Free Chlorine-T mg/L Continuous 0.520 3.000 1.360 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.580 1.770 1.200 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.730 1.970 1.310 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.600 2.160 1.310 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.310 1.530 0.860 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.210 1.230 0.680 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.310 1.330 0.780 4  Residual Free Chlorine-D mg/L Continuous 0.270 1.700 1.100 4  pH (R) pH units Continuous 6.69 7.26 7.04 6.5-8.5  pH (T) pH units Continuous 6.11 7.05 6.51 6.5-8.5  Total Alkalinity - R mg/L CaCO3 Continuous 48.00 120.00 73.0 12  Total Alkalinity - T mg/L CaCO3 Continuous 40.00 90.00 70.0 12  Residual Aluminum - T mg/L Continuous 0.013 0.199 0.048 0.1  The Township does not fluoridate the drinking water. Inorganic Parameters-2018 Sample Taken: January 23, 2018 ODWQS Parameter Unit Result ODWQS Compliant Antimony ug/L 0.20 6  Arsenic ug/L 0.20 25  Barium ug/L 24.70 1000  Boron ug/L 14.00 5000  Cadmium ug/L 0.02 5  Chromium ug/L 0.14 50  *Lead ug/L 0.01 10  Mercury ug/L 0.01 1  Selenium ug/L 0.09 10  Sodium mg/L 18.10 20  Uranium ug/L 0.07 20  Fluoride mg/L 0.06 1.5  Nitrite mg/L 0.00 1  Nitrate mg/L 0.24 10  Nitrite+Nitrate mg/L 0.24 10 

Organic Parameters-2018 ODWQS Parameter Unit Result ODWQS Compliant Alachlor ug/L 0.02 5  Atrazine ug/L 0.01 n/a  Atrazine+N-dealkylated metobolites ug/L 0.01 5  Azinphos-methyl ug/L 0.05 20  Benzene ug/L 0.32 1  Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 0.004 0.01  Bromacetic Acid ug/L 2.90 n/a  Bromodichloromethane ug/L 10.00 n/a  Bromoform ug/L 0.34 n/a  Bromoxynil ug/L 0.33 5  Carbaryl ug/L 0.05 90  Carbofuran ug/L 0.01 90  Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L 0.16 2  Chlorpyrifos ug/L 0.02 90  Chloroform ug/L 58.00 n/a  Chloracetic Acid ug/L 4.70 n/a  1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.41 200  1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.36 5  1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 0.35 5  1,1-Dichloroethylene (vinylidene chloride) ug/L 0.35 14  2-4 Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.15 900  2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) ug/L 0.19 100  Desethyl atrazine ug/L 0.01 n/a  Diazinon ug/L 0.02 20  Dibromoacetic Acid ug/L 2.00 n/a  Dibromochlormethane mg/L 0.79 n/a  Organic Parameters continued -2018 Dicamba ug/L 0.20 120  Dichloromethane ug/L 0.35 50  Dichloracetic Acid ug/L 8.80 n/a  Diclofop-methyl ug/L 0.40 9  Dimethoate ug/L 0.03 20  Diquat ug/L 1.00 70  Diuron ug/L 0.03 150  Glyphosate ug/L 1.00 280  Malathion ug/L 0.02 190  Metolachlor ug/L 0.01 50  Metribuzin ug/L 0.02 80  Monochlorobenzene ug/L 0.30 80  Paraquat ug/L 1.00 10  Pentachlorophenol ug/L 0.15 60  Phorate ug/L 0.01 2  Picloram ug/L 1.00 190  Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) ug/L 0.04 3  Prometryne ug/L 0.03 1  Simazine ug/L 0.01 10  THM (Annual Average) ug/L 61.5 100  Terbufos ug/L 0.01 1  Tetrachloroethylene ug/L 0.35 30  2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 0.20 100  Triallate ug/L 0.01 230  Trichloroethylene ug/L 0.44 5  2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.2 5  Trifluralin ug/L 0.02 45  Trichloracetic Acid ug/L 14.90 n/a  Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Annual ug/L 23.7 n/a  Average Vinyl Chloride ug/L 0.17 1  MCPA mg/L 0.00012 0.1  The Township does not fluoridate the drinking water.

Chemicals used over reporting period: Stern‐pac is used from January through to October and aluminum suphate was used as the coagulant for the balance of the year. Sodium Hypochlorite is used as the seconday disinfectant. Sulfuric acid is currently used for pH adjustment when necessary. A change in chemical dosage is typical during change in raw water quality however no abnormal usages were exoerienced. Alum was used all year as well. 2018 Annual Report Tay Area Drinking Water System

Appendix C

Chemical Usage

Sodium Hypochlorite-Lavo12% Litres Tay Area Water Membrane Filter Cleaning 39,311

50% Citric Acid Litres Tay Area Water Membrane Filter Cleaning 22,712.3

Poly Aluminum Chloride L Tay Area Water Treatment 61,675

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-23

Report Title: 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That Staff Report No. PW-2019-23 regarding the 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report be received for information.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The 2018 Annual Report (attached) for Victoria Harbour WWTP has been prepared in accordance with the M.O.E.C.C. guideline.

This report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Victoria Harbour WWTP system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

ANALYSIS:

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. The report contains a summary of the plant performance and effluent flow rates, including monthly averages and maximum daily effluent flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact with this report.

Public Works 1 March 13 , 2019 Report No. PW-2018-23

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY

2018

YEAR END REPORT

VICTORIA HARBOUR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section One 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………….Introduction and Scope

2 ……………………………………………………………………………….Wastewater System Overview

3 …………….…………………………………… Victoria Harbour Wastewater System Synopsis

4 ………………………………………… Victoria Harbour Wastewater System ECA Guidelines

Environmental Compliance Approval Summary Reporting Requirements

Section Two – Operational Overview ECA Requirement (A-L)

2. (A)……………………… Summary of Monitoring Data – Comparison to Effluent Limits

2. (B) …………………………………….………..Operating Problems & Corrective Actions Taken

2. (C) ….……………………….…………………….Maintenance Summary – Major Part of Works

2. (D) ……………………………………………..………….Effluent Quality Flow & Control Measures

2. (E) …………………………………………………….Calibration Report & Maintenance Summary

2. (F) …..………….………………………………….…………………..Efforts Made to Achieve Objective

2. (G) ……………………………………………….………..Sludge Volume & Management Summary

2. (H) ………………………………………………….……………………………………….….Complaint Summary

2. (I) ………………………….………….…….Bypass, Spill & Abnormal Event Annual Summary

2. (J) ………………….…………………….………..…Notice of Modifications Schedule B Section 1

2. (K) ……………………….…………….………..……Notice of Modifications Schedule B Section 3

2. (L) …………………………….……………….. Exceedance Summary and Corrective Actions

2. (M) ……………………….Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System (ERRIS)

Section Three - Appendices 3.1 ……………………………………………………………..……………………..……………………. R1, R2 Forms

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 1: Background

1.1: Introduction and Scope

The following performance report is generated and submitted to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment Conservation & Parks, District Manager to satisfy Condition 10 (6) of the Environmental Compliance Approval 3389-A5BKJJ issued Feb 1, 2016. The report is required on an annual basis and is to be submitted within 90 days following the end of the reporting period.

This report shall contain the following information:

a) A summary and interpretation of all monitoring data and a comparison to the effluent limits outlined in Condition 7; b) A description of operating problems encountered and corrective actions taken; c) A summary of all maintenance carried out on any major structure, equipment, apparatus, mechanism or thing forming part of the Works; d) A summary of any effluent quality assurance or control measures undertaken in the reporting period; e) A summary of the calibration and maintenance carried out on all effluent monitoring equipment; f) A description of efforts and results achieved in meeting the Effluent Objectives of Condition 6; g) A tabulation of the volume of sludge generated in the reporting period, an outline of anticipated volumes to be generated in the next reporting period and a summary of the locations to there the sludge was disposed; h) A summary of complaints received during the reporting period and any steps taken to address the complaints; i) A summary of all bypass, spill or abnormal discharge events; j) A copy of all Notice of Modifications submitted to the Water Supervisor as a result of Schedule B, Section 1, with a status report on the implementation of each modification; k) A report summarizing all modifications completed as a result of Schedule B, Section 3; l) Any other information the Water Supervisor requires from time to time.

This report will summarize the performance and related activities in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Approval.

Section 1: Background

1.2: Wastewater System Overview

The Water/Wastewater Operations oversee the treatment and collection of the municipality’s wastewater. The system includes two treatment facilities, eight pumping stations, approximately 36 km of sanitary pipe and 6 km of forcemain pipe. The treatment plants are located in Victoria Harbour and Port McNicoll.

After wastewater is treated the final effluent (essentially water) is returned to Georgian Bay by means of two outfall pipes from the two wastewater treatment plants.

Biosolids from these plants were transported and removed by Entec Waste Management Inc up to September 2018. The Township re-tendered the work and, as of October 2018 the Region of Huronia Environmental Services (ROHES) is now providing those same services which will reduce the overall cost.

The Township of Tay’s mission is to operate and maintain the wastewater system in the most efficient manner while protecting the public’s health, adhering to Ministry regulations and, to protect our water resource.

This report will summarize the performance and related activities in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Approval.

Regulations

The provincial government sets the regulations for the management of wastewater. The municipality operates its plants in accordance with operational certificates. The Ministry of Environment Conservation & Parks oversees the amount, quality and content of effluent returned to Georgian Bay. The Water/Wastewater Operations Division follows a stringent sampling schedule to meet or exceed Ministry guidelines.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 1: Background

1.3: Victoria Harbour Wastewater Synopsis

The Victoria Harbour Waste Water Treatment Plant was constructed in 1982. There have not been any upgrades to the plant prior to 2016. Phase 1 of upgrades to the plant commenced in May 2016 and completed in 2017 which comprised of a new head works building to remove all incoming debris and grit from the wastewater. Also included in the first phase was the installation of an ultraviolet disinfection system to eliminate the need to chlorinate the treated effluent

The Rated Capacity for this facility is 2364m3/day. The Inlet Works is designed for a Peak Flow of 6,600m3/day.

The plant consists of seven pumping stations and inlet works.

The inlet works consist of two parallel inlet works at the head works. The original double grit channels each 6.5 m long and 0.75m wide equipped with a manually cleaned bar screen(process & bypass) which has been left in place as a redundant inlet which is not currently in service. The new inlet works with a mechanical automated fine screen having a peak flow of 18,920m3/d; a screening dewatering press; a standby manual coarse bar; a 3000mm diameter vortex grit separator having a peak flow of 18,820m3/d.

The Aeration consists of two each 30m x 4m SWD aeration tanks equipped with fine bubble aeration system; three blowers (one standby) each rated at 307L/s at 48 kPa.

The Clarification consists of one 16m diameter by 4m deep clarifier with sludge and scum removal.

Effluent Filter consists of one 3.8m wide x 12.2m long automatic backwash filter with a surface area of approximately 46m3 which is operating at a peak design rate of 6m/h having a Peak Flow Rate of 6600m3/day.

Phosphorus removal is achieved with two dosing pumps (one standby) each rated at 727 L/day, dosing at the aeration effluent; one 23,000L chemical storage tank.

The outfall consists of 130m of 750mm diameter (land portion) and 600m of 560mm diameter (marine portion) terminating with a 34m, 8 port diffuser discharging into Georgian Bay.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report

The UV disinfection system consists of two (one standby) each having a peak flow capacity of 13,594 m3/day.

Ultra-violet light is used for a disinfection system before the effluent is discharged into Georgian Bay.

A 650 kW outdoor standby emergency diesel generator is on site.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 1: Background

1.4: Victoria Harbour Wastewater System E.C.A. Guidelines

Environmental Compliance Approval Guidelines

3389-A5BKJJ Issue Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Plant – Effluent Objectives (Best Effort) (Condition 6 (1))

Effluent Parameter Concentration Objective (mg/L) CBOD5 10.0 Total Suspended Solids 10.0 Total Phosphorus 0.30 Total Ammonia Nitrogen (May 1 – Oct 31) 8.0 (Nov 1 – Apr 30) 10.0 Ecoli 100 org./100mL

The Owner shall use “Best Efforts” to achieve the following;

Best efforts are made to ensure that the Total Phosphorus does not exceed 0.30mg/L.

Best efforts are made to ensure the plant does not exceed the Rated Capacity of the Works.

Best efforts are made to maintain the pH of the Works within the range of 7.0- 9.0.

Best efforts are made to ensure that ecoli does not exceed 100 org/100mL. The owner must notify the Ministry in writing when plant requirement levels are not achieved as per the Environmental Compliance Approval Condition 6 (1).

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Plant - Effluent Limits: (Condition 7 (1))

Effluent Parameter Max. Concentration Max. Waste Loading

CBOD5 15.0 mg/L Total Suspended Solids 15.0 mg/L Total Phosphorus 0.50 mg/L 1.18 kg/day

The Owner shall operate and maintain the Works to achieve the following;

The Owner shall ensure that the CBOD5 monthly average concentration of 15.0 mg/L is not exceeded.

The Owner shall ensure that the Total Suspended Solids monthly average concentration of 15.0 mg/L is not exceeded.

The Owner shall ensure that the Total Phosphorus Limit of 0.50 mg/L and a max waste loading limit of 1.18kg/day is not exceeded.

Non-compliance with respect to Total Phosphorus concentration and loading is considered to have occurred when the arithmetic mean value of 12 consecutive monthly values exceed 0.50mg/L and/or 1.18kg/day respectively.

The Owner shall ensure that the pH does not exceed the range of 6.0-9.5.

The Owner shall ensure that the Ecoli does not exceed the range of 100 organisms per 100mL of effluent discharged from the Works.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 1: Background Continued

1.4: Victoria Harbour Wastewater System E.C.A. Sampling Frequency

Raw/Influent samples are required to be taken monthly:

The Environmental Compliance Approval specifies that the Raw/Influent water shall be collected and sampled monthly for the following parameters:

 BOD5  Total Suspended Solids  Total Phosphorous  Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)

Final Effluent samples are required to be taken weekly:

The Environmental Compliance Approval specifies that the Final Effluent Outfall water composite samples must be collected weekly for the following parameters:

 CBOD5  Total Suspended Solids  Total Phosphorous  TAN  Ecoli  pH (On-site)  Temperature (On-site)

Effluent parameters are analyzed by SGS Lakefield Laboratory, an accredited laboratory from Lakefield, Ontario.

Lab Analytical Sampling Observation With Staff

The lab provides staff copies of analytical lab results, and they are required to initial that they have reviewed the lab results on the weekly check list.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2 (A): Summary of Monitoring Data – Comparison to Effluent Limits

EFFLUENT PARAMETERS AS PER THE E.C.A. LIMIT: (CONDITION 7)

Actual Percentage E.C.A. Limit Annual Average Achieved as per Requirement

(mg/L) Limit (mg/L)

CBOD5 2.24 100% 15.0 mg/L

TSS 2.85 100% 15.0 mg/L

0.50 mg/L Total Phos 0.05 100% 1.18 kg/day Waste Loading

Ecoli 1.68 100 org./100mL

pH 7.76 100% 6.0 – 9.5

All parameters met the Best effort and Limit for 2018.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (A) Summary of Monitoring Data – Comparison to Effluent Limits & Loading Performance Effluent Limits: Annual monthly loading performance averages as outlined in the Environmental Compliance Approval Condition 7 is as follows:

 The CBOD5 annual monthly average is 2.24 mg/L which surpasses the Limit of 15.0 mg/L and the Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 10.0 mg/L.

 The Total Suspended Solids annual monthly average is 2.85 mg/L which surpasses the Limit of 15.0 mg/L and the Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 10.0 mg/L.

 The Total Phosphorus annual monthly average is 0.05 mg/L which surpasses the Limit of 0.50 mg/L and the Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 0.30 mg/L.

 The TAN annual monthly average from May-Oct is 0.67 mg/L which surpasses the Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 8.0 mg/L.

 The TAN annual monthly average from Nov-Apr is 0.86 mg/L which surpasses Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 10.0 mg/L.

 The Ecoli annual monthly geomean average is 1.68 organisms per 100mL which surpasses the Limit of 200 organisms per 100mL and the Best Effort Effluent Objectives of 100 organisms per 100mL.

 The pH annual average was 7.76 mg/L which met the requirement of 7-9 mg/L for the entire year.

Loading Performance * The Total Phosphorus annual monthly loading concentration average is 0.09 kg/day which surpasses the Limit of 1.8 kg/day as per the Environmental Compliance Approval.

Efforts Made to Achieve Best Effort Results Regular maintenance and inspections are conducted by staff to ensure the plant is running in an efficient manner.

Staff review sampling results by the laboratory to ensure best effort results are achieved or, if modifications are required.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report

Victoria Harbour Wastewater Treatment Plant as per Environmental Compliance Approval 3389-A5BKJJ Effluent Parameter LimitObjJFM AM J J ASOND Annual ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ Avg Min Max T S S Avg 4.4 2.5 3.5 2.0 4.8 4.0 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.85 2.0 4.8 Monthly Min 15mg/L 10mg/L 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.17 2.0 3.0 Monthly Max 8.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 8.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.92 2.0 8.0 T Phos Avg 0.13 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.0 0.1 Monthly Min 0.5mg/L 0.3mg/L 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.0 0.05 Monthly Max 0.25 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.0 0.25 T Phos Loading Avg 0.27 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.09 0.0 0.3 Monthly Min 1.8kg/day ~~~ 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.0 0.11 Monthly Max 0.54 0.14 0.09 0.08 0.19 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.07 0.12 0.0 0.54 CBOD5 Avg 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.24 2.0 2.5 Monthly Min 15mg/L 10mg/L 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00 2.0 2.0 Monthly Max 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.75 2.0 4.0

TAN - (May - Oct 31) ~~~ 8mg/L ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.7 ~ ~ 0.67 0.2 1.3 TAN - (Nov - April 30) ~~~ 10mg/L 1.9 0.3 2.1 1.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.1 0.2 1.06 0.1 2.1 Amm+Amm (N) Avg (T.A.N.) 1.9 0.3 2.1 1.8 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.86 0.1 2.1 Monthly Min (T.A.N.) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.16 0.1 0.5 Monthly Max (T.A.N.) 8.8 0.7 5.0 4.0 4.1 1.2 2.7 2.7 0.8 1.8 0.1 0.4 2.69 0.1 8.8 pH Avg 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.9 7.9 7.8 8.0 7.76 7.6 8.0 6-9.5 Monthly Min 7-9 incl. 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.8 7.8 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.51 7.3 7.8 incl. Monthly Max 8.0 7.8 7.9 7.9 8.1 8.0 8.2 7.9 8.1 8.0 8.2 8.2 8.03 7.8 8.2 Ecoli (Geomean) Avg 2.0 2.0 3.1 2.0 2.0 0.3 2.0 0.6 2.0 2.0 0.3 2.0 1.68 0.3 3.1 Monthly Min 100org./100mL 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.42 0.0 2.0 Monthly Max 2.0 2.0 22.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 24.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.50 2.0 24.0

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (B) Operating Problems Encountered & Corrective Actions Taken

Rated Capacity for the plant as per the ECA is 2364m3/day.

In April the average daily flow (ADF) exceeded the rated capacity at 2364 m3/day by 19% but, did not exceed the peak daily flow 6600 m3/day and, no ECA effluent limits were exceeded.

In December the average daily flow (ADF) exceeded the rated capacity at 2430 m3/day by 2% but, did not exceed the peak daily flow 6600 m3/day and, no ECA effluent limits were exceeded.

Peak Daily Flow for the plant as per the ECA is 6600m3/day.

The peak daily flow (PDF) for 2018 was 6195m3/day in the month February.

Control Measures Taken in Reporting Period - Rated Capacity vs. Avg. Daily Flow (ADF)

There were no obvious causes observed to indicate the reason for the additional flows.

Control Measures Taken in Reporting Period - Rated Capacity vs. Max Daily Flow (PDF)

Ensure Operators are aware of PDF volume and are checking regularly and noted in the logbook for abnormality or cause.

Issues that may have contributed to Exceeding Rated Capacity

Infiltration and inflow.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (B): Efforts Made to Achieve Objective ECA Cond. 6

Regular maintenance and inspections are conducted by staff to ensure the plant is running in an efficient manner.

Staff review sampling results by the laboratory to ensure best effort results are achieved or, if modifications are required.

Upgrades to the plant were completed in 2016/17 that benefits the overall operation of the plant for the following:

 New Headworks Building complete with a screening system, by-pass channel with fixed inclined bar screen and dewatering press, vortex grit separator, air compressor, grit classifier, odour control unit, and all associated appurtenances.

 Modifications to Control Building including removal of the existing shallow bed tertiary filtration system, removal of existing sodium hypochlorite chemical systems and installation of preselected Aqua Disk cloth media filtration system, installation of a new UV disinfection system, upgraded instrumentation and control and a new diesel standby generator.

 Complete site grading and finishes including watermain and hydrant, inlet and outlet sanitary sewers, asphalt drive and access, landscaping, maintenance holes and site restoration.

 All modifications need to be constructed while the existing plant is maintained in continuous operation.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (C): Maintenance Summary – Major Part of Works

The Tay Township Water/Wastewater Operation staff performs regular equipment checks on a weekly and monthly basis to ensure equipment reliability and redundancy. All checks are documented and reviewed by the Lead Hand and Water Wastewater Operations Superintendent.

The Tay Township Water/Wastewater Operation staff perform calibration maintenance throughout the year for turbidity meters as per manufacturer’s guidelines.

Routine maintenance is carried out throughout the year including several minor items that were repaired, serviced and/ or replaced.

Upgrades to the plant commenced in 2016 and were completed in 2017 which will benefit the overall operation of the plant for the following:

 New Headworks Building complete with a screening system, by-pass channel with fixed inclined bar screen and dewatering press, vortex grit separator, air compressor, grit classifier, odour control unit, and all associated appurtenances.

 Modifications to Control Building including removal of the existing shallow bed tertiary filtration system, removal of existing sodium hypochlorite chemical systems and installation of preselected AquaDisk cloth media filtration system, installation of a new UV disinfection system, upgraded instrumentation and control and a new diesel standby generator.

 Complete site grading and finishes including watermain and hydrant, inlet and outlet sanitary sewers, asphalt drive and access, landscaping, maintenance holes and site restoration.

 All modifications need to be constructed while the existing plant is maintained in continuous operation.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (D) Effluent Quality Flow & Control Measures Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Final Effluent Flows m3

VICTORIA HARBOUR WWTP FINAL EFFLUENT FLOW

Month Total Monthly m3 ADF (m3) ADF %MDF (m3) MDF % Jan 67,156.00 2,166.32 91.64% 5,190.00 78.64% Feb 64,170.00 2,291.79 96.95% 6,195.00 93.86% Mar 58,554.00 1,888.84 79.90% 2,870.00 43.48% Apr 84,563.00 2,818.77 119.24% 4,768.00 72.24% May 57,689.00 1,860.94 78.72% 2,244.00 34.00% June 47,842.00 1,594.73 67.46% 1,819.00 27.56% July 50,676.00 1,634.71 69.15% 2,270.00 34.39% Aug 46,913.40 1,513.34 64.02% 1,863.00 28.23% Sept 53,747.00 1,791.57 75.79% 2,044.00 30.97% Oct 54,943.00 1,772.35 74.97% 2,294.00 34.76% Nov 68,435.00 2,281.17 96.50% 2,958.00 44.82% Dec 75,360.00 2,430.97 102.83% 3,708.00 56.18% Monthly Avg 60837.37m3 2003.79 (Avg) 85% (Avg) 3185.25 (Avg) 48.26% (Avg) Total Year 730,048.4m3 2818.77 (Max) 119.24 %(Max) 6195.0 (Max) 93.86 %(Max)

As per the Environmental Compliance Approval (ADF) the Average Daily Flow allowable is 2364m3/day. As per the Environmental Compliance Approval (PDF) the Peak Daily Flow allowable is 6600m3/day.

For information, the 2018 flow was 9% higher than in 2017 which was 673,034.5m3.  In April the ADF was 2818.77m3 which surpassed the Average Daily Flow allowable of 2364m3/day by 19%.  In December the ADF was 2430.97m3 which surpassed the Average Daily Flow allowable of 2364m3/day by 2%.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

6 Year Comparison ADF and MDF to Rated Capacity (2364m3/d) Year ADF m3/day % MDF m3/day % 2013 1956.5 82.8% 5820 246.2% 2014 2196.9 92.9% 5185 219.3% 2015 1663.3 70.4% 5188 219.5% 2016 1691.5 71.6% 6607 279.5% 2017 1844.7 78.0% 5071 214.5% 2018 2003.79 84.7% 6195 262.0%

Note: PDF allowable – 6600m3/day

Section 2 (D) Effluent Average Monthly Temperature

REQUIRED AS PER E.C.A. VICTORIA HARBOUR WWTP TEMP MONTHLY AVG Month Avg Monthly Temp Celc ius Jan 7.50 Feb 8.50 Mar 8.25 Apr 11.25 May 6.75 June 13.25 July 17.50 Aug 12.00 Sept 14.00 Oct 14.40 Nov 9.75

Dec 9.50

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2(E) Calibration Report & Maintenance Summary

Calibration and maintenance was completed for 2018 by Flowmetrix.

Both the raw and effluent flows are measured with magnetic flow meters and are installed in the applicable pipelines. The raw water is metered from a local pumping station and the treated final effluent discharged and metered from the plant.

For results of the calibration conducted during the reporting period please refer to the attached certificate.

As per requirements of the regulation there is a continuous measure of volume for the influent and effluent flow, annual calibration and accuracy requirements for monitoring equipment are currently in place.

The Township of Tay currently has a program in place to support flow monitoring and pH devices to be calibrated on an annual basis.

As well, the Tay Township Wastewater staffs perform regular calibration maintenance throughout the balance of the year for turbidity meters as per manufacturer’s guidelines.

Calibration Reports included for Reference

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report

Section 2: Operational Overview

2(F) Efforts Made to Achieve Objective – Condition 6

E.C.A. Concentration Actual Percentage Effluent Objective Annual Avg Achieved “Best Effort” (mg/L) as per Objective (mg/L)

CBOD5 2.24 100% 10.0 mg/L

TSS 2.85 100% 10.0 mg/L

Total Phos 0.05 100% 0.30 mg/L

Ecoli 1.68 100 org./100mL

Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN) 0.67 100% 8.0 May 1-Oct 31

Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN) Nov 1-Apr 30 1.06 100% 10.0

The pH Objective was achieved to maintain the pH of the Works within the range of 7.0-9.0.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview Section 2(G) Sludge Volume & Management Summary

The total volume of biosolids (sludge) removed from the Victoria Harbour Wastewater Treatment Plant in 2018 was 4131.0m3. There was a significant amount more removed in comparison to 2017, which was 2020m3 of sludge was transferred from the plant therefore, the forecast for 2019 is expected to be comparable to 2018. Sludge cells 1,2 and 3 were cleaned which increased the amount of sludge for 2018.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2(G) Sludge Volume & Management Summary

Entec Waste Management Inc. was contracted to transport and remove biosolids from the Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant from June 1, 2014 up until September 30, 2018. In May, the Township advertised and re-tendered the Biosolids Removal for the next 3 years.

As of October 2018 the Region of Huronia Environmental Services (ROHES) was awarded the work for the next 3 years.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (H) Complaint Summary

There were no complaints received during this reporting period.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (I) Bypass, Spill & Abnormal Event Annual Summary

The plant experienced one bypass events during this period due to the amount of rainfall.

ANNUAL BYPASS/SPILL EVENT SUMMARY 2018 ‐ AMENDED BYPASS REPORT ‐ FEB 28 2018

Bypass Summary ‐ January 1, 2018 through to December 31, 2018

Bypass Details Include ‐ Plant Location, Date, Total Duration Hours, Volume 1000m3 Victoria Harbour Wastewater Treatment Facility

Start Date End Date Duration (Hrs) Volume (1000m3) Reason MOE Report #

Feb 20 2018 Feb 21 2018 10hrs 5000m3 Rain (Tertiary Bypass) 901944

Annual Total 10hrs 5000m3 ~~

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (J) Notice of Modifications Submissions – Schedule B Section 1

1.1 Sewage Pumping Stations No changes required. .

1.2 Sewage Treatment Process No changes required.

1.3 Sewage Treatment Plant Outfall No changes required.

1.4 Pilot Systems No changes required.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (K) Notice of Modifications Submissions – Schedule B Section 3

Schedule B Section 3:

Normal or Emergency Operational Modifications

No changes required.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (L) Exceedance Summary and Corrective Actions

The bypass flow exceeded TDS for effluent.

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 2 (M) Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System (ERRIS) Annual Summary

The Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System is an online reporting system for the submission of effluent reports required by regulation, license or permit for participating federal/provincial/territorial jurisdictions.

Wastewater systems that are subject to quarterly reporting, the deadlines for each reporting period are as follows:

 January 1 to March 31 – May 15  April 1 to June 30 – August 14  July 1 to September 30 – November 14  October 1 to December 31 – February 14

Victoria Harbour WWTP - Quarterly Report

Total Volume of Effluent Deposited (m3)

 Jan – Mar – 189,880  Apr – June – 190,094  July – Sept – 151,336  Oct – Dec – 198,738 Total Annual Effluent Deposited – 730,048.4

Average CBOD (mg/L)

 Jan – Mar – 2.3  Apr – June – 2.3  July – Sept – 2.3  Oct – Dec – 2.1 Annual CBOD Monthly Average – 2.28

Average Concentration of Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)

 Jan – Mar – 3.5  Apr – June – 3.6  July – Sept – 2.3  Oct – Dec – 2.0 Annual TSS Monthly Average – 2.85

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Section 3.0 R1, R2 Forms

Tay Township 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0118 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 67. 156 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 218 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 5 . 336 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 108. 4 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 149. 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 24. 35 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 2 . 34 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 05 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 4 . 45 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 1 . 86 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 2 . 62 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 13 5 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0118 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 51 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 9 . 20 5 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 662. 00 5 PH 2 7 . 62 5 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0218 28 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 64. 170 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 292 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 6 . 195 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 5 . 000 1 Duration (hours) 80563 1 10. 0 Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 111. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 140. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 15. 75 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 52 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 54 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 54 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 28 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 70 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 06 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms - [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0218 28 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L 11. 90 2 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 47 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 11. 10 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 649. 30 4 PH 2 7 . 60 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0318 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 58. 554 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 927 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 920 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 125. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 165. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 15. 55 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 72 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 54 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 3 . 54 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 2 . 10 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 2 . 63 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 04 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0318 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L 14. 00 2 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 40 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 4 . 70 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 642. 00 4 PH 2 7 . 70 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 3 . 06 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0418 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 84. 563 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 869 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 4 . 835 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 73. 3 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 114. 3 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 12. 53 3 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 13 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 34 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 04 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 1 . 83 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 2 . 40 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0418 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 46 3 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 3 . 00 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 633. 00 4 PH 2 7 . 63 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0518 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 57. 689 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 897 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 290 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 112. 5 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 110. 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 17. 60 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 65 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 45 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 4 . 85 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 1 . 28 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 2 . 50 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 06 5 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0518 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 40 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 5 . 90 5 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 576. 00 5 PH 2 7 . 90 5 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring of the Environment Program Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0618 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 47. 842 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 595 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 1 . 819 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 98. 4 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 198. 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 19. 03 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1. 64 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 34 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 4 . 04 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 23 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 78 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 04 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring of the Environment Program Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0618 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 00 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 13. 10 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 562. 00 4 PH 2 7 . 90 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 0 . 30 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring of the Environment Program Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0718 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 50. 676 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 671 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 316 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 154. 5 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 449. 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 31. 12 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 10. 05 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 05 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 25 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 70 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 92 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 5 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring of the Environment Program Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0718 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 00 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 11. 30 5 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 508. 00 5 PH 2 7 . 70 5 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0818 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 46. 913 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 513 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 1 . 863 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 107. 3 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 197. 3 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 22. 63 3 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 83 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2. 34 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 34 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 85 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 63 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0818 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L 0 . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L 0 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 2 . 0 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 3 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 14. 80 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 599. 00 4 PH 2 7 . 60 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 0 . 56 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0918 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 53. 747 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 836 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 081 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 166. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 231. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 19. 55 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 2 . 12 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 52 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 52 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 28 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 63 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 04 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 0918 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L 0 . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L 0 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 2 . 0 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 00 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 13. 80 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 589. 50 4 PH 2 7 . 90 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1018 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 54. 943 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 772 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 294 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 384. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 705. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 37. 55 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 6 . 12 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 05 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 05 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 70 5 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 18 5 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 5 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1018 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L 20. 00 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 00 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 11. 50 5 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 582. 20 5 PH 2 7 . 90 5 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 5 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1118 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 68. 435 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 281 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 958 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 80. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 206. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 18. 20 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 02 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 04 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 04 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 00 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1118 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 7 . 55 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 1 . 60 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 646. 50 4 PH 2 7 . 80 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 0 . 30 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1218 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 75. 360 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 431 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 3 . 708 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 65. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 68. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 14. 25 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 0 . 92 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 34 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 04 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 20 4 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 70 4 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 4 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] & Mike Emms- [email protected] 705-534-7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Victoria Harbour WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 120003227 1218 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonia/Ammonium mg/L . 0 Disolved React. P. mg/L . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite . 0 Alkalinity . 0 Chlorides . 0 Conductivity . 0 PH 8 . 00 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of samples 12 13 Alkalinity 1 . 0 Nitrate/Nitrite 1 10. 40 4 Chlorides 2 . 0 Conductivity 0 626. 30 4 PH 2 8 . 00 4 Disolved Reacct. P. 2 . 0 Ecoli 2 . 00 4 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: Mike Emms Environmental Superintendent e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the 2018 Victoria Harbour WWTP Annual Report be accepted.

Prepared By: Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 2 March 13 , 2019 Report No. PW-2018-23

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-24

Report Title: 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That Staff Report No. PW-2019-24 regarding the 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report be received for information.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

The 2018 Annual Report (attached) for Port McNicoll WWTP has been prepared in accordance with the M.O.E.C.C. guideline.

This report is intended to brief the Municipal officials and the residents serviced by the Port McNicoll WWTP system’s performance over the past calendar year (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018).

ANALYSIS:

The report includes a statement of compliance with the terms and conditions of all Approvals, Licenses and Permits issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. The report contains a summary of the plant performance and effluent flow rates, including monthly averages and maximum daily effluent flows during January 1st through to December 31, 2018.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no financial impact with this report.

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-24

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report be accepted.

Prepared By: Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-24

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY

2018

YEAR END REPORT

PORT MCNICOLL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Mike Emms – Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section1: Background

1.1 Introduction and Scope

The following performance report is generated and submitted to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment Conservation & Parks, District Manager to satisfy Section 10 Reporting of the Environmental Compliance Approval Number 8421- 9PMHXN issued Oct. 21, 2014. The report is required on an annual basis and is to be submitted within 45 days following the end of the reporting period.

This report shall contain the following:

a) A summary and interpretation of all monitoring data and a comparison to the effluent limits outlined in Condition 6; including an overview of success and adequacy of the works; b) A description of operating problems encountered and corrective actions taken; c) A summary of all maintenance carried out on any major structure, equipment, apparatus, mechanism or thing forming part of the Works; d) A summary of any effluent quality assurance or control measures undertaken in the reporting period; e) A summary of the calibration and maintenance carried out on all effluent monitoring equipment; f) A description of efforts and results achieved in meeting the Effluent Objectives of Condition 5; g) A tabulation of the volume of sludge generated in the reporting period, an outline of anticipated volumes to be generated in the next reporting period and a summary of the locations to there the sludge was disposed; h) A summary of complaints received during the reporting period and any steps taken to address the complaints; i) A summary of all bypass, spill or abnormal discharge events; j) A copy of all Notice of Modifications submitted to the Water Supervisor as a result of Schedule B, Section 1, with a status report on the implementation of each modification; k) A report summarizing all modifications completed as a result of Schedule B, Section 3; l) Any other information the Water Supervisor requires from time to time.

This report will summarize the performance and related activities in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Approval.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section1: Background

1.2 Wastewater System Overview

The Water/Wastewater Operation oversees the treatment and collection of the municipality’s wastewater. The system includes two treatment facilities, eight pumping stations, approximately 36 km of sanitary pipe and 6 km of forcemain pipe. The treatment plants are located in Victoria Harbour and Port McNicoll.

After wastewater is treated the final effluent (essentially water) is returned to Georgian Bay by means of two outfall pipes from the two wastewater plants.

Biosolids from these plants were transported and removed by Entec Waste Management Inc up to September 2018. The Township re-tendered the work and, as of October 2018 the Region of Huronia Environmental Services (ROHES) is now providing those same services which will reduce the overall cost.

The Township of Tay’s mission is to operate and maintain the wastewater system in the most efficient manner while protecting the public’s health, adhering to Ministry regulations to protect our water resource.

This report will summarize the performance and related activities in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Approval.

Regulations

The provincial government sets the regulations for the management of wastewater. The municipality operates its plants in accordance with operational approvals. The Ministry of the Environment Conservation & Parks oversees the amount, quality and content of effluent returned to Georgian Bay. The water/wastewater operations division follows a stringent sampling schedule to meet or exceed Ministry guidelines.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section1: Background

1.3 Port McNicoll Wastewater System Synopsis

The Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant was constructed in the year 2000. The plant services a population of approximately 1,600.

The plant was designed for an average daily flow of 1,918m3/d and a daily peak flow of 3836m3/day. This plant also has the capacity to receive and treat septage waste at a rate of 18m3/d. The plant consist of one pumping station, an inlet works, aeration system, Zenon filtration system & UV disinfection, Zenon sludge thickening, sludge digester, and sludge storage tank and a 5000m3 equalization tank.

The pumping station was designed to handle a peak flow of 90L/s. The pumping station is equipped with two Gorman-Rupp “T-series” self-priming centrifugal pumps, a stand-by diesel generator is located in a fenced area outside the station, and P.L.C. and level control system.

The inlet works consist of two inlet channels, one with a manual bar screen and one with a screw type mechanical screen. The inlet works also has a main splitter box, which diverts flow to three places two anoxic zones in the aeration system and one plant by-pass. The plant bypass is connected to an outside 5000m3 equalization tank in the event of high flows such as heavy infiltration and inflow events.

The aeration system consists of two anoxic zones which assist in the phosphorous removal and in ammonia-ammonium reduction, two “trains” which are the main aeration tanks, housing the sludge waste pumps, sludge return pumps, and the Zenon filtration systems.

The treated water then flows through a ultra-violet light disinfection system before effluent is discharged into Georgian Bay.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section1: Background

1.4 Port McNicoll Wastewater System ECA Guidelines

8421-9PMHXN Issue Date: Oct. 21, 2014 Plant – Effluent Limits (Condition 6)

Effluent Parameter Effluent Waste Loading Concentration kg/day mg/L CBOD5 15 mg/L 28.77 kg/day Suspended Solids 15 mg/L 28.77 kg/day Total Phosphorous 0.25 mg/L 0.48 kg/day Ammonia + Ammonium Nitrogen (NFP) June 1 to – Aug 31 5.0 mg/L 9.59 kg/day (FP) Sept 1 to May 31 15 mg/L 28.77 kg/day

Plant – Effluent Objectives (Best Effort) (Condition 5)

Effluent Parameter Effluent Total Loading Concentration kg/day mg/L CBOD5 7.0 mg/L 13.43 kg/day Suspended Solids 7.0 mg/L 13.43 kg/day Total Phosphorous 0.15 mg/L 0.29 kg/day Ammonia+Ammonium Nitrogen (NFP) June 1-Aug 31 2.0 mg/L 3.8 kg/day E.Coli 200 org. / 100mL NFP- Non-Freezing Period FP- Freezing Period

The pH effluent from the works within the range of 6.5 - 9.0, inclusive at all times.

The owner shall ensure that the rate of flow of sewage into the wastewater treatment plant does not exceed the peak daily flow rate of 3836m3/day for any period of time greater than one calendar day by utilizing the equalization tank to contain the extra flow.

The owner shall ensure that the rate of flow of sewage into the wastewater treatment plant does not exceed the peak weekly flow rate of 3356m3/day for any period of time greater than one calendar week.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report The owner shall ensure that the rate of flow of sewage into the wastewater treatment plant does not exceed the peak monthly flow rate of 3068m3/day for any period of time greater than one calendar month. The owner shall ensure that the rate of flow of sewage into the wastewater treatment plant does not exceed the average daily flow rate of 1918m3/day for any period of time greater than one calendar year.

Sampling Frequency

The Environmental Compliance Approval specifies that Influent Water samples shall be collected bi-weekly (every other week) for the following parameters:  BOD5  Suspended Solids  Total Phosphorous  Dissolved Reactive phosphorous  Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen  Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen  Alkalinity  Chlorides  Conductivity  pH

The Environmental Compliance Approval specifies that Final Effluent samples shall be collected bi-weekly (every other week) for the following:  CBOD5  Suspended Solids  Total Phosphorous  Dissolved Reactive Phosphorous  Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen  Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen  Alkalinity  Chlorides  Conductivity  pH  Ecoli (only bi-weekly)

Influent and Effluent parameters are analyzed by SGS Lakefield Laboratory, an accredited laboratory from Lakefield, Ontario.

Lab Analytical Sampling Observation With Staff The lab provides staff copies of analytical lab results, and they are required to initial that they have reviewed the lab results on the weekly check list.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2 (A): Operational Overview

EFFLUENT PARAMETERS COMPARED TO THE LIMIT (CONDITION 6):

Actual Percentage E.C.A. Limit Annual Avg Achieved Requirement

(mg/L) as per LIMIT (mg/L) 15.0 Conc. 2.03 Concentration CBOD5 100% 28.77 kg/day 2.47 Loading Waste Loading 15.0 Conc. 1.84 Concentration TSS 100% 28.77 kg/day 2.25 Loading Waste Loading 0.25 Conc. 0.10 Concentration Total Phos 100% 0.48 kg/day 0.09 Loading Waste Loading 5.0 Conc. TAN 0.16 Concentration 100% 9.59 kg/day (June 1 – Aug 31) 0.22 Loading Waste Loading 15.0 Conc. TAN 0.10 Concentration 100% 28.77 kg/day (Sept 1 – May 31) 0.07 Loading Waste Loading

Ecoli 0.86 200 org./100mL (Geomean)

pH 7.02 100% 6.0 - 9.5

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

2. (A) Summary of Monitoring Data – Comparison to Effluent Limits & Loading Performance – Condition 6

Effluent Limits: The Owner shall operate and maintain the Works such that the concentrations and waste loadings of the materials named below as effluent parameters are not exceeded as per Condition 6 of the ECA:

 The CBOD5 annual monthly average concentration level was 2.03mg/L which met the Effluent Limit for the year.

 The Total Suspended Solids annual monthly average concentration level is 1.84mg/L which met the Effluent Limit for the year.

 The Total Phosphorous annual monthly average concentration level is 0.10mg/L which met the Effluent Limit for the year.

 The TAN - Ammonia + Ammonium Nitrogen (June 1 – Aug 31 Conc. Limit is 5 mg/L) monthly average plant concentration is 0.16mg/L.

 The TAN - Ammonia + Ammonium Nitrogen (Sept 1 – May 31 Conc. Limit is 15 mg/L) monthly average plant concentration is 0.10mg/L.

 The E.Coli annual monthly geomean average concentration level is 0.86 organisms /100mL which met the Effluent Limit for the year.

 The pH annual monthly average level is 7.02 which met the Effluent Limit for the entire year.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Effluent – Waste Loading Limits:

The Owner shall operate and maintain the Works such that the concentrations and waste loadings of the materials named below as effluent parameters are not exceeded as per Condition 6 of the ECA:

 The CBOD5 annual monthly average concentration level was 2.47kg/day which met the Effluent Waste Loading Limit for the year.

 The Total Suspended Solids annual monthly average concentration level is 2.25kg/day which met the Effluent Waste Loading Limit for the year.

 The Total Phosphorous annual monthly average concentration level is 0.09mg/L which met the Effluent Waste Loading Limit for the year.

 The TAN - Ammonia + Ammonium Nitrogen (June 1 – Aug 31 Conc. Limit is 9.59 kg/day) monthly average plant concentration is 0.07kg/day which met the Effluent Waste Loading Limit for the year.

 The TAN - Ammonia + Ammonium Nitrogen (Sept 1 – May 31 Conc. Limit is 28.77 kg/day) monthly average plant concentration is 0.22kg/day which met the Effluent Waste Loading Limit for the year.

*The average monthly loading concentration for all the above parameters surpass the best effort practices outlined in the Environmental Compliance Approval as well.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report

PORT MCNICOLL WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT- MONTHLY AVERAGES Effluent PARAMETER LIMIT OBJECTIVE JFMAMJJASONDANNUAL MIN/MAX/AVG ~~~ ~~~ AVG MIN MAX Total Suspended Solids 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00 2.0 2.0 Monthly Min 15 mg/L 7 mg/L 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00 2.0 2.0 Monthly Max 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00 2.0 2.0 Total Suspended Solids Loading 3.1 3.1 3.2 4.5 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 2.8 2.9 2.25 0.1 4.5 Monthly Min 28.77 kg/day 13.43 kg/day 3.1 3.1 3.2 4.5 2.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 2.8 2.9 2.45 1.3 4.5 Monthly Max 3.1 3.1 3.2 4.5 2.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 2.8 2.9 2.45 1.3 4.5 Total Phosphorus 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.24 0.31 0.19 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.0 0.3 Monthly Min 0.25mg/L 0.15 mg/L 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.20 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.0 0.2 Monthly Max 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.33 0.55 0.23 0.12 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.14 0.0 0.6 Total Phosphorus Loading 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.21 0.13 0.06 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.09 0.0 0.2 Monthly Min 0.48 kg/day 0.29 kg/day 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.0 0.1 Monthly Max 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.10 0.23 0.38 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.0 0.4 CBOD5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.03 2.0 2.3 Monthly Min 15 mg/L 7 mg/L 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00 2.0 2.0 Monthly Max 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.08 2.0 3.0 CBOD5 Loading 3.1 3.1 3.2 4.5 2.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.6 2.8 2.9 2.47 1.3 4.5 Monthly Min 28.77 kg/day 13.43 kg/day 3.1 2.8 3.2 4.3 2.6 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.7 2.9 2.40 1.3 4.3 Monthly Max 3.1 2.8 3.2 4.3 2.6 1.3 1.4 1.3 2.1 1.6 2.7 2.9 2.46 1.3 4.3 TAN - (June-Aug 31) Conc 5 mg/L 2 mg/L ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.1 0.1 0.1 ~ ~ 0.10 0.1 0.1 TAN - (June-Aug 31) Loading 9.59 kg/day 3.8 kg/day ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.1 0.1 0.1 ~ ~ 0.07 0.1 0.1 TAN - (Sept-May 31) Conc 15 mg/L ~ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 ~ ~ ~ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.16 0.1 0.7 TAN - (Sept-May 31) Loading 28.77 kg/day ~ 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 ~ ~ ~ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.22 0.1 0.8 Ph 8.0 8.0 8.1 2.0 2.0 8.1 7.8 7.7 8.1 7.9 8.3 8.2 7.02 2.0 8.3 Monthly Min 6.0 - 9.5 7.9 7.9 8.1 2.0 2.0 8.0 7.7 7.4 8.0 7.4 8.3 8.2 6.90 2.0 8.3 Monthly Max 8.2 8.1 8.1 2.0 2.0 8.1 8.0 8.0 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.3 7.11 2.0 8.3 Eco li ( Ge o m e an ) 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.3 0.86 0.0 2.0 Monthly Min 200 org./100mL 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.67 0.0 2.0 Monthly Max 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.84 0.1 2.0

* Min Detection Limit (MDL) is 2.0mg/L

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

2. (B) Operating Problems & Corrective Actions Taken

Rated Capacity for plant as per the ECA is - 1918m3/day.

In April the plant exceeded the Average Daily Flow (ADF) 2236.8m3/day by 16%.

Peak/Max Daily Flow for plant as per the ECA is–1.6 x 1918m3/day=3836 m3/day.

In February the Peak/Max Daily Flow (MDF) exceeded the allowable Peak/Max Daily Flow at 3876m3/d by 1%.

Control Measures Taken in Reporting Period – Rated Capacity vs Avg. Daily Flow (ADF) Operator Awareness.

Control Measures Taken in Reporting Period – Rated Capacity vs Max Daily Flow (MDF) Operator Awareness.

Issues that may have contributed to exceeding Rated Capacity Infiltration and inflow.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (C) Maintenance Summary – Major Part of Works

The Tay Township Water/Wastewater Operations Division staff performs regular equipment checks on a weekly and monthly basis to ensure equipment reliability and redundancy. All checks are documented and reviewed by the Lead Hand and Water Wastewater Operations Superintendent.

There were no major operating problems that occurred within this reporting period.

Routine maintenance is carried out throughout the year including several minor items that were repaired, serviced or replaced.

Continuous upgrading of equipment is ongoing as a preventative maintenance measure.

In 2017, the 3 Zenon supplemental air blowers and, one dip tank pump were replaced. The Municipality makes every effort to ensure the process and equipment is operating efficiently and compliant with the ECA requirements.

In 2018, we added cellular alarm dialer and replaced CNB impellor and changed the pump sheaves.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2 (D) Effluent Flow Summary Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Final Effluent Flows m3 ADF – 1918m3/day MDF – 3836m3/day PORT MCNICOLL WWTP FINAL EFFLUENT FLOW m3 Month Total Monthly m3 ADF (m3) ADF % MDF (m3) MDF % Jan 48,091.0 1,551.3 80.9% 3,553.0 92.6% Feb 43,846.0 1,623.9 84.7% 3,876.0 101.0% Mar 50,109.0 1,616.4 84.3% 2,734.0 71.3% Apr 67,105.0 2,236.8 116.6% 3,672.0 95.7% May 39,831.0 1,284.9 67.0% 2,152.0 56.1% June 20,743.0 691.4 36.0% 835.0 21.8% July 21,248.0 685.4 35.7% 867.0 75.7% Aug 20,809.0 671.3 35.0% 927.0 24.2% Sept 21,891.0 729.7 38.0% 1,072.0 27.9% Oct 24,825.0 800.8 41.8% 1,306.0 34.0% Nov 42,289.0 1,409.6 73.5% 2,043.0 53.3% Dec 45,655.0 1,472.7 76.8% 2,666.0 69.5% Avg Month 37,203.5 1231.2 (Avg) 2141.9 (Avg) Total Year 446,442.0 2236.8 (Max) 116.6% (Max) 3876.0 (Max) 101% (Max)

The plant exceeded the Average Daily Flow (ADF) in April-2236.8m3 The plant exceeded the Max Daily Flow (MDF) in February-3876m3

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report 5 Year Comparison ADF and MDF to Rated Capacity (1918m3/d) Year ADF m3/day % MDF m3/day % 2014 1343.8 70.1% 4565 119.0% 2015 1145.6 59.7% 3035 79.1% 2016 1235.7 64.4% 4054 105.7% 2017 1386.4 72.3% 3820 99.6% 2018 1231.2 64.2% 3876 101.0%

As per the Environmental Compliance Approval (ADF) the Average Daily Flow allowable is 1918m3/day.

Therefore, the plant exceeded the Average Daily Flow (ADF) in April- 2236.8m3 by 16%.

As per the Environmental Compliance Approval (MDF) the Max Daily Flow allowable is 3836m3/day.

Max Daily Flow or, Peak Daily Flow for plant as per the ECA is– 1.6 x 1918m3/day=3068.8 m3

Therefore, in February (3876m3/d) the plant did exceed the Max Daily Flow rate.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (E) Calibration Report & Maintenance Summary

Calibration and maintenance was completed for 2018 by Flowmetrix.

Both the raw and effluent flows are measured with magnetic flow meters and are installed in the applicable pipelines. The raw water is metered from a local pumping station and the treated final effluent discharged and metered from the plant.

For results of the calibration conducted during the reporting period please refer to the attached certificate.

As per requirements of the regulation there is a continuous measure of volume for the influent and effluent flow, annual calibration and accuracy requirements for monitoring equipment are currently in place.

The Township of Tay currently has a program in place to support flow monitoring and pH devices to be calibrated on an annual basis.

As well, the Tay Township Wastewater staffs perform regular calibration maintenance throughout the balance of the year for turbidity meters as per manufacturer’s guidelines.

Calibration Reports included for Reference.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report

Section 2: Operational Overview

2 (F) Efforts Made to Achieve Objective – Condition 5

E.C.A. Concentration Actual Percentage Achieved Effluent Objective Annual Avg. as per Objective “Best Effort” (mg/L) (mg/L) 7.0 Conc. 2.03 Concentration CBOD5 100% 13.43 kg/day 2.47 Loading Waste Loading 7.0 Conc. 1.84 Concentration TSS 100% 13.43 kg/day 2.25 Loading Waste Loading 0.15 Conc. 0.10 Concentration Total Phos 100% 0.29 kg/day 0.09 Loading Waste Loading 2.0 Conc. TAN 0.10 Concentration 100% 3.8 kg/day (June 1 – Aug 31) 0.07 Loading Waste Loading

TAN 0.16 Concentration n/a n/a (Sept 1 May 31) 0.22 Loading

Ecoli 0.86 200 org./100mL

pH 7.02 100% 6.0 – 9.5

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report 2 (F) Efforts Made to Achieve Objective – Condition 5

Regular maintenance and inspections are conducted by staff to ensure the plant is running in an efficient manner.

Staff review sampling results by the laboratory to ensure best effort results are achieved or, if modifications are required.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (G) Sludge Volume & Management Summary

The total volume of biosolids (sludge) removed from the Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant in 2018 was 896.0m3.

In comparison, in 2017 1032.0m3 of sludge was transferred from the plant therefore, the forecast for 2019 is expected to be comparable.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2 (G) Sludge Volume & Management Summary

Entec Waste Management Inc. was contracted to transport and remove biosolids from the Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant from June 1, 2014 up until September 30, 2018. In May, the Township advertised and re-tendered the Biosolids Removal for the next 3 years.

As of October 2018 the Region of Huronia Environmental Services (ROHES) was awarded the work for the next 3 years.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (H) Complaint Summary

There were no complaints received during this reporting period.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (I) Bypass, Spill & Abnormal Event Annual Summary

There were no bypass events during this reporting period.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (J) Notice of Modifications Submissions – Schedule B Section 1

1.1 Sewage Pumping Stations o Added cellular alarm dialer o Replaced CNB impellors and changed pump sheaves

1.2 Sewage Treatment Process Not applicable

1.3 Sewage Treatment Plant Outfall Not applicable.

1.4 Sanitary Sewers Not applicable

1.5 Pilot Systems Not applicable.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

Section 2 (K) Notice of Modifications Submissions – Schedule B Section 3

Normal or Emergency Operational Modifications

Not applicable.

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview

2 (L) Exceedance Summary & Corrective Actions

Total Phosphorus Exceedance – Monthly Average

Result: 0.31 Monthly Avg. Objective: 0.15mg/L Limit: 0.25mg/L Port McNicoll Wastewater Treatment Plant Annual Exceedances/Spill Reports 2018

PLANT RESULT UNIT DESCRIPTION/COMMENT PARAMETER DATE MONTHLY "Description of the efforts made and results achieved RESOLUTION DATE LOCATION AVERAGE MEASURE in meeting the Effluent Objectives".

Objective: 0.15 Limit: 0.25 Sample taken on July 3, 2018 exceeded the Limit and it i PM WWTP July 31 2018 Ttl Phos 0.31 mg/L July 31 2018 thought to be due to Operator error. (Not enough Alum 4 Samples taken in month - Results: 55,27,20,21

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Section 2: Operational Overview 2 (M) Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System (ERRIS) Annual Summary

The Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System is an online reporting system for the submission of effluent reports required by regulation, license or permit for participating federal/provincial/territorial jurisdictions.

Wastewater systems that are subject to quarterly reporting, the deadlines for each reporting period are as follows:

 January 1 to March 31 – May 15  April 1 to June 30 – August 14  July 1 to September 30 – November 14  October 1 to December 31 – February 14

Port McNicoll WWTP- Quarterly Report

Total Volume of Effluent Deposited (m3)

 Jan – Mar – 142,046  Apr – June – 127,679  July – Sept – 63,948  Oct – Dec – 112,769 Total Annual Effluent Deposited – 446,442

Average CBOD (mg/L) - 2.1

 Jan – Mar – 2.0  Apr – June – 2.0  July – Sept – 2.1  Oct – Dec – 2.0 Annual Monthly Average – 2.0

Average Concentration of Suspended Solids (mg/L)

 Jan – Mar - 2.0  Apr – June - 2.0  July – Sept - 2.0  Oct – Dec - 2.0 Annual Monthly Average – 2.0

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report

SECTION 3

APPENDIX

R1, R2

Tay Township 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0118 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 48. 091 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 551 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 3 . 553 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 47. 3 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 39. 3 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 9 . 43 3 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 03 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 03 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 03 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 3 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 60 3 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 04 3 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0118 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 7 . 33 3 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 42 3 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 1 . 93 3 Alkalinity mg/L 2 238. 33 3 Chlorides mg/L 2 68. 00 3 Conductivity mg/L 2 708. 33 3 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 73 3 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 165. 33 3 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 11. 77 3 Chlorides mg/L 2 69. 33 3 Conductivity uS/cm 2 695. 00 3 Ph 2 8 . 01 3 Ecoli 0 2 . 00 5 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 3 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0218 28 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 43. 846 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 624 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 3 . 876 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 Duration (hours) 80563 1 Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 Duration (hours) 80565 1 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 74. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 82. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 11. 10 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 22 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 50 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 05 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Raymond Knuff [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0218 29 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 8 . 45 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 75 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 2 . 16 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 237. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 69. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 724. 50 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 84 2

30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 170. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 10. 94 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 71. 00 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 696. 50 2 Ph 2 7 . 99 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0318 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 50. 109 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 616 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 734 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 00 0 Duration (hours) 0 Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 00 0 Duration (hours) 0 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 54. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 62. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 8. 90 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 7. 92 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 80 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell [email protected] Raymond Knuff [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0318 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 7. 95 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 52 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 1. 04 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 236. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 76. 50 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 724. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 78 2

. . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 162. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 11. 30 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 76. 00 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 693. 00 2 Ph 2 8 . 10 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 2

. . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0418 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 67. 105 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 2 . 237 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 3 . 672 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 42. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 55. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 5 . 90 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 0 . 72 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 70 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 05 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0418 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 5 . 00 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 42 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 2 . 32 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 243. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 72. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 708. 50 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 80 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter Code Dec. # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 189. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 9 . 09 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 73. 00 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 706. 50 2 Ph 2 8 . 14 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0518 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 39. 831 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 285 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 152 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 76. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 10. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 03 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 7 . 02 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 0 . 12 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 65 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 07 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 149. 50 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0518 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 6 . 95 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 58 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 1 . 87 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 209. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 65. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 639. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 86 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 149. 50 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 13. 03 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 68. 00 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 671. 00 2 Ph 2 8 . 16 2 Ecoli 0 2 . 00 5 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 04 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0618 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 20. 743 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 0 . 691 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 0 . 835 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 77. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 59. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 16. 05 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 62 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 60 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 24 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0618 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 13. 60 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 1 . 09 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 0 . 06 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 213. 00 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 68. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 678. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 87 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 104. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 15. 95 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 71. 50 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 647. 00 2 Ph 2 8 . 05 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 21 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0718 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 21. 248 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 0 . 685 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 0 . 867 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 80. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 74. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 19. 67 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 2 . 02 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2. 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 55 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 31 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0718 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 14. 93 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 1 . 30 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 . 06 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 186. 33 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 61. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 603. 33 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 49 2

. . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 71. 33 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 15. 00 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 65. 33 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 587. 25 2 Ph 2 7 . 78 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 40 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 12. 59 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0818 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 20. 809 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 0 . 671 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 0 . 927 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 124. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 128. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 18. 75 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 2 . 22 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 . 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 . 2 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 . 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 . 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 . 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0818 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 14. 60 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 1 . 12 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 0 . 06 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 193. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 61. 50 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 621. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 38 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 49. 33 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 16. 23 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 67. 00 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 598. 67 2 Ph 2 7 . 71 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 5 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 11 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0918 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 21. 891 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 0 . 730 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 1 . 072 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 103. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 135. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 15. 95 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 82 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 32 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 50 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 08 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 0918 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 13. 75 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 . 92 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 . 06 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 179. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 65. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 606. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 36 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 91. 33 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 14. 67 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 67. 33 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 669. 67 2 Ph 2 8 . 11 2 Ecoli 0 2 . 00 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 05 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1018 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 24. 825 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 . 801 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 1 . 306 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 96. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 107. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 16. 50 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 1 . 52 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 1 . 04 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 04 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1018 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 11. 95 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 1 . 18 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 0 . 08 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 219. 50 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 62. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 14969. 00 2 Ph uS/cm 2 123. 70 2 .

. . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 90. 30 3 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 15. 66 5 Chlorides mg/L 2 65. 67 3 Conductivity uS/cm 2 637. 80 5 Ph 2 7 . 94 5 Ecoli 0 2 . 00 5 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 3 .

. . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1118 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 42. 289 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 410 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 043 30 34 35

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 69. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 43. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 9 . 90 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 0 . 92 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 10 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 50 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1118 30 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 7 . 40 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 53 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 1 . 24 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 252. 00 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 63. 00 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 729. 50 2 Ph uS/cm 2 7 . 88 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 164. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 11. 20 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 61. 50 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 727. 50 2 Ph 2 8 . 28 2 Ecoli 0 2 . 00 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248 Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R1

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1218 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P.

01FLOWS Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Results 12 13 Total Flow (103 m3) 50010 3 45. 655 Average Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50015 3 1 . 473 Maximum Daily Flow (103 m3/d) 50020 3 2 . 666 30 34 35 38

26BYPASS # of Occurrences 12 13 Plant Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50026 3 . 0 Duration (hours) 80563 1 . Secondary Bypass Volume (103 m3) 50040 3 . Duration (hours) 80565 1 . 30 34 35 38

03RAW SEWAGE # of Samples 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 0 57. 2 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 0 70. 2 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 7 . 35 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 1 0 . 72 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT 12 13 BOD5 (mg/L) 00001 1 2 . 02 Suspended Solids (mg/L) 00006 1 2 . 02 Ammonia + Ammonium (mg/L) 00019 2 0 . 12 TKN (mg/L) 00020 2 0 . 85 2 Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 00033 2 0 . 03 2 30 34 35 38

07DISINFECTION 12 13 Chlorine Used - (kg as Cl2) 50100 1 . Chlorine Dosage - (mg/L as Cl2) 80410 1 . Chlorine Residual - (mg/L as Cl2) 80420 1 . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: Tammy Campbell - [email protected] Mike Emms - [email protected] 705 534 7248 Enviornmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, MOE at [email protected] & your local District/Area Office, MOE (http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/contact/regionalmap.php). Ministry Municipal Utility Monitoring Program of the Environment Mechanical Plants R2

Municipality: Township of Tay Operating Authority: Corporation of the Township of Tay

Project Name: Port McNicoll WWTP

Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0 Mailing Address: 450 Park Street, Victoria Harbour, ON L0K 2A0

Data Period File No. Works Number Days Discharge Type Update Code Month Year 46 110001417 1218 31 2 R 12 3 1116192021 22 80

C.P. 03RAW SEWAGE Parameter CodeDec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Ammonium mg/L 2 6 . 50 2 Dissolved React. P. mg/L 2 0 . 37 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 2 . 21 2 Alkalinity mg/L 2 268. 00 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 64. 50 2 Conductivity mg/L 2 763. 50 2 Ph uS/cm 2 8 . 12 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

04FINAL EFFLUENT Parameter Code Dec. Monthly Average Results # of Samples 12 13 Alkalinity mg/L 2 186. 00 2 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 2 10. 14 2 Chlorides mg/L 2 64. 50 2 Conductivity uS/cm 2 736. 50 2 Ph 2 8 . 25 2 Ecoli 0 0 . 30 4 Disolved Reac. P mg/L 2 0 . 03 2 . . . . . 30 34 35 38

Operator's Comments and Contact Person's Phone number & Return completed blue form to: e-mail address: [email protected] & [email protected] 705 534 7248

CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the 2018 Port McNicoll WWTP Annual Report be accepted.

Prepared By: Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-24

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-25

Report Title: Tay Township Local Climate Change Action Plan

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PW-2019-25 regarding the climate change action plan be received;

And that the Township adopt 2015 to 2028 reduction targets for Community Sector and Corporate Sector greenhouse gas emission of 6% and 25% respectively;

And that the Tay Township Local Climate Change Action Plan be adopted;

And that the Plan be revised and updated regularly and the actions be implemented as resources and budget permit.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to advance the Township’s position in the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' (FCM) Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program. On March 14th, 2018 Council approved a model resolution to join PCP program. At that same time, Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) was approved as the Township’s Associate Member to the PCP program, responsible for completing program requirements on the Township’s behalf.

Milestone 1 of this program is establishing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventory. In July 2018, the Township of Tay achieved Milestone 1 of the

_____ Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-25

program, with the submission of the corporate and community GHG baseline inventory presented in SSS’s Local Climate Change Action Plan (attached).

The recommendations contained in this staff report, fulfill the requirements to achieve Milestone 2 (set emission reduction targets) and Milestone 3 (develop a local action plan).

ANALYSIS:  PCP PROGRAM: The PCP program is a national network of municipal governments working to address climate change. This voluntary program is a joint initiative between FCM and International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) Canada, and is based on a five-milestone framework to help municipalities reduce energy costs, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The model is flexible, in that milestones can be completed in many ways, with the expectation that PCP members complete all five milestones within 10 years of joining. - Milestone 1: Completion of a GHG inventory and forecast for the community and corporation and the establishment of a baseline year for measuring progress toward future targets and benchmarking. Achieved July, 2018 - Milestone 2: Setting of GHG emission reduction targets for the community and corporation. - Milestone 3: Development of an action plan to achieve the targets established in Milestone 2. - Milestone 4: Implementation of the action plan. - Milestone 5: Monitoring and reporting on the progress toward achieving the targets established in Milestone 2.

 The Township’s involvement in the Program is very responsible and shows a commitment to understanding and reducing its ‘environmental footprint,’ and is directly aligned with Official Plan goal, ‘to promote awareness of and mitigate against natural and human-made hazards and consider the potential impacts of development as it relates to climate change.’

 The County of Simcoe is also a member of this Program.

 The Tay Township Local Climate Change Action Plan is attached. This Plan satisfies the requirements of Milestone 3 of the PCP program. Contained in this plan, are the corporate and community GHG emission targets as required by Milestone 2 of the Program.

 This Plan was developed by SSS with input from Township staff. The Plan has been reviewed by staff and was updated following review at a meeting with staff from all the affected departments.

_____ Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-25

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT: There is no direct budget impact related to this report.

Many GHG and energy reduction actions are being pursued within existing municipal work plans and in many cases through initiatives driven by co-benefit priorities (i.e. cost-savings through retrofits and improvements, protection of land and water, multi-modal communities). At this time, SSS and the Sustainability Committee do not anticipate additional budget or cost implications on behalf of the municipality in relation to the next steps as outlined above beyond the Township of Tay’s annual shared contribution to the Sustainable Severn Sound project. Costs associated with monitoring and reporting are expected to be modest, and brief progress reports will be undertaken at two year intervals by SSS staff.

By participating in this project the Township will be in a better position to apply for future funding opportunities.

CONCLUSION: The Township has benefitted from the cooperative efforts of Severn Sound Sustainability to advance our position in the Partnership for Climate Protection program. To satisfy Milestones 2 and 3 of the program the targets and action plan set out in the Tay Township Local Climate Change Action Plan should be adopted.

Prepared By: Peter Dance, Director of Public Works

Recommended by: Date: March 6, 2019

Peter Dance, P. Eng. Director of Public Works

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

_____ Public Works 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-25

REGIONAL GHG SUMMARY C. 2018 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS). All Rights Reserved. This preparation of this plan was carried out with assistance from the Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program (MCIP), a fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). Funding was also received from the Ontario Trillium Foundation (OTF) an agency of the Government of Ontario. Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the authors, FCM, the Government of Canada and OTF accept no responsibility for them. This plan was prepared by Tracy Roxborough and Victoria Ervick of SSS.

2 Foreward...... 4 Acknowledgements...... 5 Role of Sustainable Severn Sound and the Sustainability Committee...... 5 Sources of support...... 5 Introduction...... 6 What is the Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP)?...... 8 Why develop a LCCAP?...... 8 How does the LCCAP relate to other policy and plans?...... 9 Ontario’s Climate Change Action Plan, 2016...... 9 Community Emissions Reduction Planning: A Guide for Municipalities...... 9 O. Reg. 397/11: Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plans ...... 9 Growth Plan, 2017...... 9 Service area and area profile...... 10 GHG inventory ...... 11 Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) protocol ...... 11 Baseline year...... 12 Business-as-usual (BAU) projections...... 12 Overview of total regional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions...... 13 Total GHG emissions by municipality (baseline 2015) ...... 13 Corporate inventory...... 14 Corporate GHG emissions by sector (total, 7 municipalities)...... 14 Corporate GHG emissions by sector (per municipality)...... 15 Corporate BAU forecast...... 15 Corporate GHG emissions forecast, 2015-2028 ...... 15 Community inventory ...... 16 Community GHG emissions by sector (total, 7 municipalities)...... 16 Community GHG emissions by sector (per 7 municipalities)...... 17 Contents Community BAU forecast ...... 17 Community GHG emissions forecast, 2015-2028 ...... 17 Proposed GHG targets ...... 18 Corporate GHG emission target...... 18 Community GHG emission target ...... 19 Stakeholder engagement...... 20 What key stakeholder groups provided input into the development of the plan? ...... 20-21 What we learned...... 22-23 Community perception on climate change impacts ...... 23 18 key recommendations...... 24 Understanding our carbon footprint and greening our community...... 24 Engaging externally to support long-term climate action ...... 25 Building capacity for local climate action...... 26 Reducing GHG emissions...... 27 Next steps...... 28 Implementation plan...... 28 Final thought...... 29 Overview of the services of Sustainable Severn Sound...... 30 References and endnotes ...... 31 3 Foreward

On behalf of our seven partner municipalities and three partner organizations, Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) is pleased to present the first greenhouse gas (GHG) report under our Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP). Over the past eight months, the Towns of Midland and Penetanguishene and the Townships of Tiny, Tay, Severn, Georgian Bay and Oro-Medonte, as well the North Simcoe Community Futures Development Corporation (NSCFDC), the Simcoe

Muskoka District Health Unit (SMDHU) and the Severn Sound Environmental Association Photo Credit: Andrew Mendler/Metroland

(SSEA) have been working together with community stakeholders to understand the impacts Township of Tiny’s Deputy Mayor Steffen Walma (L), associated with climate change and what contribution we are making locally to this defining Sustainability Committee member and Council designate to the PCP program; Mayor George Cornell (C); and CAO Doug issue of our time. This partnership amongst the seven municipalities and three community Luker (R), Sustainability Committee Chairperson, and staff agencies builds upon the past efforts of creating the Sustainability Plan, and is an example of designate to the PCP program the power of collective action in motion. Through this process, five of our seven municipalities have joined the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program, further demonstrating their commitment to taking action on climate change. These municipalities join over 350 municipalities across Canada in applying a proven, five -milestone performance based framework to reducing carbon emissions. Over the past four years, SSS and the Sustainability Committee have grown in knowledge and in strength, and we look forward to continuing to build momentum through our collective action to address climate change.

CAO Doug Luker, Sustainability Committee Chairperson and staff designate to the PCP program

“Reducing the amount of GHG emissions produced in our region will not happen overnight. But by working together, by supporting and encouraging each other, and by spreading the word about ways to reduce carbon emissions, we can make a significant difference both to people living in our region today and for generations to come. There are lots of simple steps that municipalities and their communities can take to help tackle climate change – individually they may or may not make a significant difference in the quantity of GHGs, but added together across the area and over time, they will result in a reduction of our carbon emissions, and successfully help to reduce our collective impact on the environment.”

Tracy Roxborough, Sustainability Coordinator SSS

4 Acknowledgements Role of Sustainable Severn Sound and the Sustainability Committee

The Sustainability Committee serves as an advisory committee to SSS by supporting the objectives to:

Educate municipalities on best Encourage the adoption of practices/ Advocate for sustainable environmental, 1 practices in climate change planning 2 policies within local municipal operations 3 social and economic practices/policies and connect them to resources (i.e., to support climate change action and within our service area. guides, case studies, and funding), sustainable communities, and

List of Sustainability Committee members and PCP (PCP) representatives per municipality:

Municipality or Agency Representative(s) The Town of Midland Councillor Jonathan Main; Councillor Jack Contin The Town of Penetanguishene Deputy Mayor Anita DubeauPCP; Councillor Mike Lauder; Andrea Betty, Director of Planning and Community DevelopmentPCP The Township of Georgian Bay Councillor Paul WianckoPCP; Nicholas Popovich, Director of Development ServicesPCP Township of Severn Councillor Ron StevensPCP; W. Henry Sander, Chief Administrative OfficerPCP Township of Oro-Medonte Councillor Barbara Coutanche Township of Tay Councillor Catherine RootPCP; Robert Lamb, Chief Administrative OfficerPCP Township of Tiny Deputy Mayor Steffen WalmaPCP; Doug Luker, Chief Administrative OfficerPCP Simcoe Muskoka District Brenda Armstrong, Program Manager, Health Hazards and Vector Borne Health Unit Disease, Environmental Health Department; Morgan Levison, Public Health Promoter, Health Promotion and Communications Severn Sound Environmental Association Julie Cayley, General Manager North Simcoe Community Chris McLaughlin, General Manager/President Futures Development Corporation

PCPTo date, five of SSS’s seven partner municipalities have joined the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program developed by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and I.C.L.E.I – Local Governments for Sustainability. These five local governments have designated both a staff member and a Council member to represent their municipality and community in the PCP program. Sources of support

The North Simcoe Community Futures Development Corporation is the host of the SSS project, and provides immeasurable in-kind support to SSS staff and the Sustainability Committee. Each municipality provides an equal financial contribution to the SSS project to support the Sustainability Coordinator position. SSS secured funding to support this project from OTF, FCM and the Government of Canada.

5 Introduction

Climate change is being experienced by communities throughout the province. duration, and frequency of rainfall will have the potential to overtake storm water Flooding, extreme heat, changing water levels and stronger storms are only a networks, and cause localized flooding in our communities. Winter storms will few of the impacts which confront municipalities in Ontario and throughout be more intense, and the variability in temperature could increase the chance for Canada. more ice and hail storms which could damage built infrastructure. Overall, think warmer, wetter and wilder. Local municipalities will most likely be challenged with more precipitation and higher temperatures which could result in lower water levels in Georgian Bay Although we cannot exactly define our future climate, work completed in the due to the increased evaporation and transpiration of surface water. Hotter area of climate science allows us to project the likely climatic conditions in the temperatures will cause more heat-waves that would put our residents and coming years. By looking at projections to 2050 for our region prepared by guests at risk, not only through the temperature itself, but the area could see a climate scientists, utilizing data generated by the Intergovernmental Panel on decrease in air quality, and the warmer weather could result in the increase and Climate Change (IPCC CMIP5 Project)1, the typical year at mid-century is likely intensity of algal blooms in our lakes and rivers. Additionally, increased intensity, to be 3-4 degrees Celsius warmer each month than at present, and about 10 6 per cent wetter. The majority of precipitation will work and at home, we can begin to reduce our carbon likely occur in the winter and spring, and we will footprint. The GHG producing activities by our society up experience much drier summers and falls than to now will continue to impact us into the future. The now. These conditions will produce drier soils, and changes that we make now will only serve to better the the amount of water flowing in rivers and streams conditions for those in the future, such as our children, will be reduced, which could impact the ability and their grandchildren. of wetlands to remain saturated. With reduced precipitation and hotter temperatures in the The actions suggested in this plan are actions we can summer and fall, our forests and greenspace take today. Not only will these actions help to protect will be at a greater risk of fire. our natural assets, green our communities, support healthy people, and save money; they will help to limit the The good news is – we can make a difference. By potential for catastrophic climate changes in the future. Fast facts mitigating, or reducing GHGs through a change in And although we may not be here – someone will, so let’s our behaviours and an adjustment to practices at try to leave it better than we found it! 1. The ‘Toronto Ice Storm’ (December 2013), resulted in The rate of global warming over the last 50 years is almost double the rate of $200 million of property warming over the last 100 years. Worldwide, 14 of the 15 hottest years on record damage and approximately have occurred since 20002 2016 20 per cent loss of the city’s tree canopy. Hottest year on record for the GHG emissions are a result of what we do on a daily basis, 2. Intact Financial is raising 3 planet. and most of these emissions are due to energy use, such as premiums by as much as electricity, natural gas, gasoline and diesel. But, GHGs are also 15-20 per cent to deal with produced from how we dispose of our waste, where we live and the added costs of weather- how we choose to build upon the landscape. GHG’s related property damage.

3. Thunder Bay declared a state of emergency in May 2012 after being hit by a series of thunderstorms, flooding basements of homes and businesses due to overwhelmed sewer and storm water systems.4

7 What is the Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP)?

The LCCAP includes the development of a community-wide greenhouse (GHG) inventory, the setting of corporate and community GHG reduction targets, and the creation of an action plan to reduce GHG emissions in order to meet the identified GHG reduction targets. For the purpose of this report, the GHG inventory is aggregated to represent the total emissions of the seven municipalities, and also individually for each Town or Township. Initiatives arising from the implementation of the LCCAP will work to reduce the overall GHG emissions within our seven municipalities.

During the plan development phase, SSS took into consideration existing municipal plans and strategies of our seven partner municipalities in order to align with and contribute to the larger objectives of each local government. As SSS develops each respective municipal LCCAP, staff will work with our partner municipalities to integrate those GHG inventories, GHG reduction targets and climate change actions from the LCCAP into internal municipal documents where possible (i.e., conservation and demand management plan, council and/or community-based strategic plan, official plan, asset management plans, etc.).

Why develop a LCCAP?

1. Demonstrates leadership among small rural municipalities 2. Acts as a valuable planning tool in reducing GHG emissions 3. Alignment with policy and legislation 4. Realization of numerous co-benefits 5. Increased access to funding 6. Streamlined approach to the utilization of resources 8 7. Collaborative projects allow for improved implementation How does the LCCAP relate to other policy and plans?

Ontario’s Climate Change Action Plan, 2016 Growth Plan, 2017 In 2014, Ontario committed to reducing GHG emissions that cause climate change In 2017, the province released the new Growth Plan. Charting a course to 2041 by 6 per cent below 1990 levels by 2014, 15 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020, and policy objectives, this policy framework connects land use decision to climate 80 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050. In June 2016, the Province released its five action, which will influence municipalities and other local government agencies year Ontario Climate Change Action Plan to fight climate change, reduce GHG over the long-term. The Growth Plan includes a requirement for upper and emissions to meet their targets, and transition to a low-carbon economy. The plan single-tier municipalities to set climate policies and actions in their Official identifies a series of specific actions across a number of different themes and is a Plans -- encouraging all municipalities to set emission reduction targets that significant step forward in addressing climate change across the province. support the provincial goals, and develop GHG inventories.

Community Emissions Reduction Planning: CONNECT THE DOTS A Guide for Municipalities Adaptation + Mitigation Synergies To help meet commitments made under Ontario’s Five-Year Climate Change Action Plan and to support implementation of the provincial land use planning Adaptation Mitigation framework related to climate change, the Ministry of Environment and

Climate Change (MOECC) recently finalized and released this Guide to support Afforestation, Green Energy efficiency municipalities and other practitioners in completing GHG inventories and Open space preservation infrastructure Renewable energy developing community emissions reduction plans. It should be noted, that the Land use changes, Power system Relocation resilience Combined heat and power PCP program is recognized as a tool within the Guide for municipalities to utilize in undertaking GHG emission planning, with the LCCAP aligning with the Guide. Infrastructure protection Sustainable Sustainable transportation Building design transportation Methane capture and use Flood mitigation Water and energy O. Reg. 397/11: Energy Conservation and Demand conservation Industrial process Emergency response improvements Management Plans Building Municipalities are required to prepare Energy Conservation and Demand Business continuity plans weatherization Carbon sinks Management Plans (CDM Plan) that include the following, (1) a clear corporate Community engagement Both mitigation vision and policy that includes goals, objectives and strategic priorities for and adaptation managing energy use, (2) details about the municipality’s energy baseline and options are influenced a summary of past successes and present initiatives, and (3) a list of energy by geographical conservation and demand management actions as well as the estimated cost and Source: http://ccap.org/connecting-the-dots-adaptation-mitigation-synergies/ location and the scale energy savings information. The municipality is required to update this Plan every of development. five years, with the next update required in 2019. The GHG inventories, targets and actions within the LCCAP will be integrated into each municipal CDM Plan. 9 Photo Credit: Andrew Mendler/Metroland

MIDLAND Service area and area profile PENETANGUISHENE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY SSS operates as a not-for-profit as a sub-program of the North Simcoe TINY Community Futures Development Corporation (NSCFDC). SSS provides services TAY to six municipalities and their communities in central and north Simcoe SEVERN County, and one in the District Municipality of Muskoka. The residents of these ORO-MEDONTE municipalities represent 37 per cent of the County’s population, and 4 per cent of the population of the District Municipality of Muskoka, and include the Towns of Midland and Penetanguishene, and the Townships of Tiny, Tay, Severn, Georgian Bay and Oro-Medonte. These municipalities are primarily rural and range from 2,499 to 21,500 residents, representing a total permanent resident population of approximately 85,000, with that number growing to almost 200,000 with the return of the area’s seasonal residents.

The areas main industries include tourism, agriculture and healthcare. The area has a rich history, as well as a connection to nature and the outdoors that make the location a great place to live and visit.

10 Greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory

A GHG inventory brings together data on community and municipal sources of GHG emissions to estimate emissions for a ‘’As a rural community, one given year. The inventory year of 2015 was chosen for both corporate and community GHG inventories. GHG emissions of the ways we support our presented in the LCCAP are a combination of the inventories for the seven municipalities. As a result, each municipality urban neighbours is through inventory constitutes a subset of the total GHG emission inventory for 2015. the care of our natural and ecological resources that Two separate GHG inventories and forecasts have been created for our municipal partners: one for regional municipal benefit the population as a corporate operations and one for regional community sources. As per the PCP protocol, the inventories consist of the whole. Although our influence following sources of GHG emissions: over carbon emissions may be less than in urban areas, CORPORATE COMMUNITY smaller communities play an Buildings, street lighting, water and sewage Residential, commercial and institutional, important role in responding to a changing climate, and treatment, municipal fleet and solid waste industrial, transportation and solid waste in joining the PCP program, we are demonstrating that Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) Protocol climate action is important The LCCAP is guided by the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program.5 The PCP program is managed and delivered to our municipality, and by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability.6 The PCP program is sending that message to a network of Canadian municipal governments that have committed to reducing GHGs and to acting on climate change. our community and to our guests.” Since the program’s inception in 1994, over 350 municipalities have joined the PCP program, making a public commitment to reduce GHG emissions. PCP program membership covers all provinces and territories and accounts for more than 65 per Nicholas Popovich, cent of the Canadian population. The program empowers municipalities to take action against climate change through a Director of Development Services, five-milestone process: The Township of Georgian Bay, Sustainability Committee Milestone 1 – Creating a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and forecast; representative Milestone 2 – Setting an emissions reductions target; Milestone 3 – Developing a local action plan; Milestone 4 – Implementing the local action plan; and Milestone 5 – Monitoring progress and reporting results. CLICK To learn more about HERE FCM and ICLEI Canada form the PCP Secretariat, providing administrative and technical support to support municipalities the national PCP program, please visit: in reducing GHG emissions. The Secretariat also provides national recognition for member achievements. In 2018, the Town https://fcm.ca/home/programs/ of Penetanguishene, and the Townships of Tiny, Tay, Severn and Georgian Bay signed onto the PCP program, recognizing partners-for-climate-protection.htm SSS as their Associate Member responsible for assisting them in advancing through the milestone program.

11 Baseline year

In order to effectively manage GHG emissions, local governments must first measure and report. FCM recommends the selection of a baseline year that is current, to ensure complete and reliable data. SSS has chosen a baseline year of 2015 due to the fact that this was the earliest year that contained a sufficient amount of accessible information that could be used to create the inventory. Establishing a baseline is a useful tool to identify areas for improvement, inform development of a GHG reduction action plan, estimate cost savings from reductions, and serve as a reference point to track improvements.

Energy and emissions quantities and expenditures were collected for all seven municipalities as well utilities per municipality for the years 2014, 2015, and 2016 and inputted into both the PCP Tool and SSS’s internal data analysis aid. In the event that actual amounts for 2015 (baseline year) could not be collected, assumptions were applied from prior years or the next most relevant data sources. Details on the energy and emissions data collected, their sources and their level of quality are outlined in the methodology document available at www.sustainablesevernsound.ca.

In line with the PCP methodology, provincial and utility specific emission factors for stationary fuel combustion and electricity combustion were derived from Environment Canada’s National Inventory Report 1990-2015: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada.7

Business-as-usual (BAU) projections

A BAU forecast is used to estimate future GHG emission levels in the absence of local government action on climate change based on projected population growth. Based on data taken from Statistics Canada’s Focus on Geography Series, 20168, annual population growth rates for all seven municipalities were averaged to accurately represent a general BAU projection across the seven municipalities. Using the PCP tool and SSS’s internal data analysis aid, BAU emissions were extrapolated based upon 3.1 per cent average annual population growth rate. This assumes emissions will increase at the same rate as population growth. Both the corporate and community BAU projections are presented in Figures 1 (p. 15) and 2 (p. 17).

12 Overview of total regional GHG emissions Total GHG In 2015, total GHG emissions for all seven municipalities (Midland, Penetanguishene, Tiny, Tay, Severn, Georgian Bay and Oro-Medonte), was 522,417 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e). Approximately 1 emissions, per cent of total GHG emissions (5,994 tCO2e) can be attributed to municipal operations with the 2015 remaining 516,423 tCO2e generated by the community. A breakdown of these emissions is provided in Table 1. Tonnes of CO2e CORPORATE 5,994 COMMUNITY 516,423 99% COMMUNITY 1% CORPORATE Total GHG emissions by municipality (baseline, 2015)

Municipality Corporate GHG emissions - tCO2e Community GHG emissions - tCO2e

Town of Midland 1,677 133,825

Town of Penetanguishene 779 67,139

Township of Tiny 929 72,210

Township of Tay 912 39,347

Township of Severn 787 62,291

Township of Georgian Bay 522 33,840

Township of Oro-Medonte 388* 107,771

Total 5,994 516,423

*Township of Oro-Medonte’s corporate inventory does not include electricity consumption from streetlights, or total fuel consumption (gasoline or diesel). Table 1

13 Corporate inventory

Corporate climate change considerations were calculated from the perspective of the internal operations of each municipality within SSS’s jurisdiction for 2015 and reported by sector. GHG emissions were reported from heating and electricity used by sector (building and facilities, fleet vehicles, streetlights, water and wastewater, and corporate waste) as well as by emission source (electricity, Total corporate natural gas, propane, heating oil, gasoline, diesel, waste, and wastewater). GHG emissions by sector Energy consumption for building and facilities, water and wastewater and streetlights was determined using the open data catalogue for Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for the Broader Public Sector (BPS) 9, under O. Reg. 397/11 which requires BPS organizations to:

1. Report annually to the Ministry of Energy on their energy use and GHG emission and publish the reports on their websites (as of July 1, 2013)

2. Develop a five-year consecutive plan and publish the plan on their websites. Plans must be updated every five-years (as of July 1, 2014). 40% FLEET Energy consumption for building and facilities, water and wastewater and street- 34% BUILDINGS lights that were not reported for 2015 under O. Reg. 397/11, was determined using 22% WATER & SEWAGE actual billed electricity and natural gas consumption for those sectors provided by 2% STREETLIGHTS respective municipalities. Fleet vehicle emissions were calculated using actual fuel 2% WASTE consumption data derived from municipal records. No significant assumptions were required to complete the corporate inventory as actual consumption data was available for all sectors and fuel types.

GHG emissions from solid waste is unique among emission sources typically quantified by local governments and presented unique reporting challenges. These emissions reflect the impact of methane released through the decomposition of organic matter in landfills, and can be calculated based on total waste deposited in landfill. With actual waste generation data unavailable at the time of publication, SSS used the PCP Tool’s ‘methane commitment’ model to estimate the downstream methane emissions attributable to solid waste generated at corporate facilities based on approximations of the size of garbage bins used, their average fullness, and the frequency of their pickup. 14 Corporate GHG emissions by sector (per municipality)

STREETLIGHTS FLEET BUILDINGS & FACILITIES WASTE WATER & SEWAGE

4% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 18% 12% 20% 21% 20% 4% 38% 35% 1% 2% 39% 37% 41% 57% 23% 56% 75% 2% 1% 39% 34% 84% 24%

Town of Midland Town of Township of Tiny Township of Tay Township of Township of Township of Penetanguishene Severn Georgian Bay Oro-Medonte

*Township of Oro-Medonte’s corporate inventory does not include electricity consumption from streetlights, or total fuel consumption (gasoline or diesel).

CORPORATE GHG EMISSIONS FORECAST, 2015-2028 Corporate BAU forecast 9,000 BAU forecast

In 2015, our seven municipalities contributed 5,994 tonnes of CO2e from Baseline emissions Tonnes their day-to-day municipal operations. -15% Reduction 5,000 Based on the average projected growth for our area (3.1 per cent), corporate Years 2015 2028 emissions are expected to grow to 8,913 tonnes CO2e by 2028 if no significant Baseline emissions Baseline emissions Target emissions (2015) (2028, -15% reduction) changes are made. Total GHG emissions (BAU, 2028) 5,994 8,913 5,095

Figure 1 Community inventory

The community GHG inventory includes climate change considerations from the perspective of the communities that SSS services. Community energy usage and emissions were calculated for 2015 and reported by sector (residential, institutional, commercial and industrial buildings, transportation, and community solid waste) as well as by emission source (electricity, natural gas, Total community propane, fuel oil, and waste). GHG emissions by sector Where possible, emissions from stationary energy (residential, commercial and institutional, and industrial), was based on actual metered energy consumption data provided by local utilities depending on the community. Hydro One, Alectra Utilities, Newmarket-Tay Hydro and Midland PUC provided electricity consumption data for their respective communities, and Enbridge and Union Gas provided natural gas data. For this report, no actual consumption data for fuel oil and propane could be acquired.

GHG emission estimates for community transportation were calculated based on annual vehicle kilometers travelled (VKT) as recommended by the PCP Protocol (p. 43). VKT was calculated by multiplying total number of dwellings by usual 52% TRANSPORTATION residents, the number of vehicles per household and the average annual distance 25% RESIDENTIAL traveled per vehicle. 10% WASTE 8% COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL With six of our municipalities serviced by the County of Simcoe, community 5% INDUSTRIAL solid waste emissions were estimated by taking the County’s waste per capita (475 kg/capita) as outlined in the Solid Waste Management, 2015 Annual Report10 and multiplying it by the total population. Waste emissions for the Township of Georgian Bay, located within the District Municipality of Muskoka, were calculated by downscaling provincial data as recommended by the PCP Protocol.

16 Community GHG emissions by sector (per municipality)

TRANSPORTATION RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE

12% 2% 20% 2% 22% 45% 22% 1% 27% 45% 33% 33% 14% 55% 55% 5% 15% 45% 1% 13% 2% 71% 6% 5% 4% 12% 12% 12% 10% 1% 8% 60% 8% 8% 16%

Town of Midland Town of Township of Tiny Township of Tay Township of Township of Township of Penetanguishene Severn Georgian Bay Oro-Medonte

COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS FORECAST, 2015 – 2028

800,000 Community BAU forecast BAU forecast

In 2015, 516,423 tonnes of CO2e Baseline emissions were emitted overall by the seven Tonnes communities. With an average -6% Reduction 400,000 projected population growth of 3.1 per cent, community emissions are Years 2015 expected to reach 768,013 tonnes CO2e 2028 by 2028 if no actions are taken to reduce Baseline emissions Baseline emissions Target emissions (2015) (2028, -6% Reduction) our GHG emissions. Total GHG emissions (BAU, 2028) 516,423 768,013 485,439 Figure17 2 Proposed GHG targets

Setting emission reduction targets is essential to spur action on climate change and to track progress. GHG reduction targets show a public statement about a community’s commitment to climate change action. The PCP program recommends a 20 per cent reduction in emissions from municipal operations and a 6 per cent reduction in emissions from community operations, within 10 years of joining the program. To ensure the reduction targets are met, it is important to take into consideration the context of our local municipalities and their communities. Therefore, SSS and the members of the Sustainability Committee recommend a corporate operations GHG emissions target of 15 per cent below 2015 levels by 2028, and a community GHG emissions target of 6 per cent below 2015 levels by 2028*.

15% 2015 REDUCTION Corporate GHG emission target

It is recommended that our seven municipalities collectively achieve a 15 per cent reduction in corporate GHG emissions from the 2015 baseline of 5,994 tCO2e by 2028. This is equivalent to 899 less tonnes of CO2e emitted by 2028, or 89.9 less tonnes of CO2e per year over the next 10 years.

* These GHG reduction targets reflect our current level of understanding of the GHG reduction potential of recommended initiatives. As additional actions are identified, SSS and the Sustainability Committee may revise these targets.

18 “This collaborative effort among municipalities in our area will strengthen the capacity of our communities to be more resilient to climate change, while providing Severn with the tools to find opportunities to reduce GHG emissions – setting the foundation for future climate planning.”

Councillor Ron Stevens, Township of Severn, Sustainability Committee representative

2028

6% 2015 2028 REDUCTION Community GHG emission target

With community GHG emissions contributing the vast majority of total GHG emissions, there are a lot of opportunities for action. It is recommended that the communities of Midland, Penentanguishene, Tiny, Tay, Severn, Georgian Bay and Oro-Medonte collectively achieve a 6 per cent reduction in community GHG emissions by 2028 from the 2015 baseline emissions of 516,423 tCO2e. This is equivalent to 30,985 less tonnes of CO2e emitted by 2028, or 3,098.5 less tonnes of CO2e per year over the next 10 years. 19 Stakeholder engagement What key stakeholder groups provided input into the development of the plan?

People and health Ecological assets and water Public health may be affected by changes in climate. The projected rise in global temperatures is expected These include increased respiratory and cardiovascular to result in intensification of the water cycle, causing disease, changes in the frequency and location of food- more severe dry seasons and wetter rainy seasons, along and water-borne illnesses, fluctuations in the availability with the possibility of more frequent extreme weather and the price of food, and the accelerated spread of events. Rising GHGs, higher temperatures, changes in disease caused by insects. precipitation, flooding, drought duration and frequency will all have significant effects on tree and plant growth, as well as on water resources.

Economy and employment Transportation Action on climate change has the potential to create jobs. More than a third of Ontario’s GHG emissions are caused by Resources and tools are becoming less expensive and the transportation sector, with cars and trucks contributing more available to help businesses and individuals become for more than 70 per cent of the total GHGs produced per more energy-efficient and quicken the shift to a low- the sector. In the majority of our local communities, public carbon society. As a tourist-friendly area which depends transit is not readily available with personal vehicle usage on that influx of guests for a strong, local economy, a daily necessity. As our communities grow, further transit a changing climate and altered weather patterns initiatives such as carpooling, electric vehicle incentives, throughout our communities could impact the success and green fleet programs can reduce the impact the and viability of this industry in the future. transportation sector has on the environment.

The area of all the Great Lakes covered in ice has declined between 1970 and 2013, with the greatest decline on Lake Superior (by 42 per cent), followed by Lake Ontario (by 32 per cent), Erie (by 25 per cent), Michigan (by 21 per cent) and Huron (by 19 per cent)11 20 Fast Facts

A 1 degree rise in temperature and frequent extreme weather events can reduce global production of corn, wheat, rice, and soy by 9 per cent in 2030s, and up to 23 per cent by 2050.12

Energy Agriculture and local food Ontario’s municipal governments own more infrastructure Where our food comes from and how it is made plays an than any other level of government. Local decisions about important role in reducing our environmental impact and buildings, land-use and transportation have significant mitigating climate change. The average meal travels 1,200 impacts on how people consume energy and produce kilometres from the farm to your plate. Climate change GHGs. Many opportunities still remain untapped in the will likely increase the cost of food, as more extreme residential and business sectors for conservation and weather and shortage of resources could put pressure energy reduction, including the consideration of net- on the industry. Local food security can be enhanced by metering and renewable energy alternatives such as solar, supporting local producers and establishing a strong, local wind and geothermal. processing and distribution system.

Land use planning Waste Climate change is linked to key policy areas in all levels of Our waste contributes to GHGs, not only by the relation government. Land-use decisions, active transportation, to production and transportation, but also because community energy planning, green infrastructure and of methane gas when organic waste is disposed of in stormwater management techniques can all impact the landfills. Methane recovery systems can be explored for quantity of GHGs produced. Development plans, secondary use in municipal landfills, and programs which support plans and municipal zoning by-laws are all tools to help composting, organics and blue/grey bin recycling, and prepare for a variety of anticipated climate change impacts. personal and corporate waste reduction practices can reduce GHG emissions.

Methane is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of its global warming potential (GWP), with emissions from Canadian landfills accounting for 20 per cent of national methane emissions.13 21 RTS TO O PA P R E T R N

E E

SP T R E O S R N A

Y S D

E E P S U 28 V R

U ER S K A EV E E P N CT S -A IO T O N

282 S T ’ - SENT V E A L R T I I

L D P O

A

E N

O C 2

‘ 1 S

MUNIT 30 Y Stakeholder engagement M

B O ART B S I C C

Summary of activities Q W L E E N UBSC S S R 1 S IB W E E R Community engagement and outreach by SSS S -N E offered multiple opportunities and methods IPA IC N 20 W for the public to share their ideas on climate T RT S E change and how we can reduce GHGs. A N P T The purpose of this engagement and STS 150 N A outreach was to: L E B A I 1. Offer our communities the opportunity V D

to provide their ideas for GHG reduction E E

M I WS SSU initiatives, E E 14 N S 300 - 2. Prioritize actions that were important to E our municipal partners, and C M S RE L E I N 3. Promote municipal and community F - I

N

O

awareness of the local climate change G

C

S E action plan initiative. 6

22 SPEAK T E R R What we learned E S P

X E Q: Is climate change as an important 5 issue to you and one that requires action 84% by municipalities and our communities to reduce current and future impacts?

84% YES 8% SOMEWHAT 8% NO

SUBSCR A S IB LIM TE W E C - E R ‘ T S Y A Q: What climate change impact are you most -N T L

E I K

N S concerned about?

W U ’

E

M

N M

O 6C Tornadoes Emergencies Vector-borne Disease Heatwaves Forest Fires Forest Poor Air Quality Soil Erosion

IS WS SU Nile Virus West E E N S -

Reduced Snowmelt Drought E Ecosystems Extreme Weather 8 Natural Areas High Wind Ice Storms Flooding Public Health Native Species Increased Precipitation

Ticks Lyme Disease Change 23 18 key recommendations

Providing residents with Understanding our carbon footprint and greening our community information on how to reduce their carbon 1. Deliver a collaborative environmental education program that will offer programs to footprint and arming educate and inform residents on why and how to reduce the GHG contributions of their them with the incentives community, household and themselves. and tools needed to take

2. Develop a program to advocate for seasonal and local eating to reduce the demand for hands-on action to reduce out of season produce, reducing GHGs associated with growing and transportation, and their contribution to to support growth of the local food economy. climate change, we can

3. Establish a community-based water education program to increase water conservation, then measure tangible encouraging and incentivizing practices such as low-flow toilets and shower-heads, GHG reductions within rainwater collection (i.e., barrels and cisterns) and xeriscaping (drought-resistant plantings). the community. Potential

reduction of 2 per cent 4. Prepare information for municipal land managers and landowners on methods for maintaining and enhancing their treed areas in response to projected weather and per capita by 2022 would climate impacts, promoting tree protection on municipal and residential properties by result in a reduction of developing an ecological services evaluation standard. 631,008 tonnes, equal to

approximately 2,257,975,911 5. Produce a regional pollinator strategy with a goal to identify what additional actions can be taken by municipalities to better manage roadsides and municipal properties to kilometres driven by an protect, enhance and create habitat for pollinators, such as bees and butterflies. average passenger car.14

24 The establishment of pollinator habitat is connected to municipal and community land use practices. By establishing Engaging externally to support long-term climate action ‘no-mow zones’, land managers and residents 1. Develop supportive relationships with energy service providers to explore will reduce fuel use by less renewable energy development, to expand customer access to utility data, and to improve customer access to available incentives and rebates. mowing, thereby saving money and time, while also 2. Identify partners for a pilot project to explore low-impact development receiving the co-benefit of techniques (using nature as a model to manage rainfall at the source) into new improved air quality and developments and infrastructure upgrades to better manage water run-off and to help moderate warmer local temperatures. enhanced natural areas.

3. Explore opportunities to increase municipal use of low-carbon and renewable energy technologies, and investigate the opportunity for net-metering to allow municipalities to offset electricity charges by using municipal assets to generate power.

4. Create a multidisciplinary working group to advise on the development of a climate change adaptation strategy complementary to the LCCAP.

“Municipalities are on the front lines of responding to climate change as we must plan for unexpected weather events and manage climate-related impacts to our community. The LCCAP will help Penetanguishene plan, build and maintain facilities, greenspace and infrastructure strategically, while creating a safe and sustainable future.”

Andrea Betty, Director of Planning and Community Development, Town of Penetanguishene, Sustainability Committee representative 25 Building capacity for local climate action

1. Integrate each respective municipal and community GHG inventory and GHG reduction targets and any projected impact to GHGs, into the planning process for construction, retrofitting or enhancement of any municipal facilities or infrastructure projects. Municipalities have a key role to play in both 2. Review and update emergency planning and preparedness for floods, mitigating and adapting wildfire, xtremee heat and other extreme weather as a result of climate change impacts. to climate change. Local governments influence up 3. Integrate provincial policy recommendations for climate change planning to half of Canada’s GHG into municipal operations by including GHG inventories and GHG reduction targets into asset management plans, conservation and demand emissions through land management plans, strategic plans and official plans. use management and planning. They also invest 4. Continue to monitor, measure and report on municipal and community in infrastructure that can GHG emissions and the impact of any GHG reduction initiatives in relation to the regional and each respective municipal GHG reduction target. increase communities’ resilience to climate change.

26 Food and organic wastes makes up approximately 1/3 of Ontario’s waste stream. Approximately 6 per cent of Ontario’s total GHG emissions come from the waste sector, with 90 per cent Reducing GHG emissions of these emissions mostly from organic solid waste 1. Improve the availability of GHG data to municipalities and their stakeholders, and disposal in landfills. When prioritize GHG emissions reductions by modelling the potential of the respective action food and organic materials per municipality to reduce GHG emissions. are landfilled, they break 2. Identify and maintain a database of opportunities for energy retrofits at municipal down and emit methane, a facilities by reviewing energy conservation and demand management plans, and GHG that is 25 times more creating a resource hub to support municipalities in updating their required plans to harmful to our climate than reduce energy conservation and implement GHG reduction initiatives. carbon dioxide.15 3. Prepare a comprehensive strategy involving a transportation demand management plan and cleaner vehicle plan to reduce GHGs by reducing unnecessary travel and switching to more efficient or alternative fuel vehicles where feasible.

4. Undertake a municipal waste audit in each respective municipal facility to identify opportunities for reduced GHGs contributions through improved recycling and green- bin/organics participation at these facilities and during municipally-led events and festivals.

5. Work to support the increase of electric vehicles (EVs) ownership by developing policies and programs for EV use by municipal staff and the community by introducing employee incentives, supporting increased access to charging stations and implementing priority parking policies. 27 Next steps

“The support of SSS has been invaluable to our municipalities. The LCCAP provides the Township of Tay with a roadmap to reduce our overall GHG emissions, while meeting our energy needs. The implementation of this plan will put Tay on track to support and deliver on our GHG emission reduction targets.”

Councillor Catherine Root, Township of Tay, Sustainability Committee representative

Implementation plan The time frame associated with each action will be identified as being short, medium or long-term, and will be adhere to the In mid-2018, SSS will begin preparation of an implementation PCP program’s suggested timeline of ten years, being 2018 to plan to complement the LCCAP. For each action identified, a 2028. The 18 actions to be included in the Implementation Plan clear timeframe and agencies or representatives essential for will serve as a guide to reduce energy consumption and GHG implementation will be identified. The Implementation Plan will emissions in municipal operations and in the community, while identify the possible impact associated with implementation also building the capacity and foundation for successful local of the action within municipal operations and the community. climate action to 2028.

28 Final thought

Climate change is one the greatest challenges of our time – affecting every aspect of our daily lives, from the food we eat to the extracurricular activities we enjoy.

We all have a role to play. Actions that we take today can have a significant impact on our environment and the sustainability of our area for generations to come. Conserving energy and becoming less reliant on fossil fuels reduces several types of pollutants which in turn improves overall public health, encourages innovation and saves money. Reducing our daily water intake protects our water sources and the bodies of water that we enjoy. And last but certainly not least, practicing the four R’s, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rethink our waste, has the potential to cut methane emissions and GHG emissions, and contribute to an overall healthier economy and environment.

Over time, fighting climate change requires a shift in how we live, work and move. It will require the involvement of everyone from individuals, businesses, diverse communities to governments – separately and collectively, both short and long-term. There is strength in numbers, and this collaborative approach to climate change planning has the opportunity to lead a movement that will result in a healthier, more prosperous and sustainable future!

“My generation and generations after me were born into a world where climate change is an indisputable fact. It is not a theory to deny or accept, but rather a global threat, of which the effects we can already see. I have faith that we can make this the issue we collectively tackle and overcome.”

Victoria Ervick, Climate Change Coordinator 29 Overview of the services of Sustainable Severn Sound

Responsibilities of SSS and the Sustainability Committee include:

1. Prepare and submit reports to meet membership requirements and advance municipalities through the PCP program’s 5-milestone framework,

2. Promote, communicate and educate municipalities and the community about SSS’s role and the progress of the LCCAP, further defining SSS and the Sustainability Committee as the area’s climate change and sustainability ‘head-quarters,’

3. Collaborate with municipalities and the community to create and implement projects that deliver on the LCCAP recommendations,

4. Provide research and information as requested by member municipalities (i.e., best practices, funding and grant information, and data analysis), and;

5. Seek funding opportunities, prepare applications and administer grants to fund municipal and community-based climate action projects.

30 Contact information

Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) and the Sustainability Committee P.O. Box 8, 105 Fourth Street Midland, ON L4R 4K6 P: 705.526.1371 x. 112 E: [email protected] W: www.sustainablesevernsound.ca

Connect with us on social media

@SustainableSevernSound https://www.facebook.com/SustainableSevernSound/

@sustainsevsound

1 Science and Research Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Natural Resource Information Section, Climate Change Office, 2015. Climate change projections for Ontario: An updated synthesis for policymakers and planners. McDermid J., Fera S., and Hogg, A. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Printed in Ontario, Canada. Available from http://www.climateontario.ca/MNR_Publications/CCRR-44.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2018. 2 Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Government of Ontario, 2018. Why we need to fight climate change. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Printed in Ontario, Canada. Available from https://www.ontario.ca/page/ministry-environment- and-climate-change. Accessed April 4, 2018. 3 Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, 2017. Developing Ontario’s Next Adaptation Plan, Ontario Climate Symposium 2017. Aavailable from http://cleanairpartnership.org/cac/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/OCC-Symposium- Presentation-Karen-Clark-05-09-2017-Final.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2018. 4 Report on the Symposium on Extreme Weather: Impacts, Challenges and Adaptations, Available from: http://www.climateforum.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Extreme-Weather-Symposium-REPORT.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2018. 5 The Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2016. PCP Protocol: Canadian supplement to the international emissions analysis protocol. Available from: https://fcm.ca/Documents/reports/PCP/PCP_Protocol_Canadian_Supplement_EN.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2017. 6 ICELI - Local Governments for Sustainability, 2016. http://www.icleicanada.org/. Accessed November 8, 2017. 7 United Nations, Climate Change, 2018. National emissions inventory, 2015. Available from: https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/greenhouse-gas-inventories/submissions-of-a annual-greenhouse-gas-inventories-for-2017/submissions-of-annual-ghg-inventories-2015. Accessed December 7, 2017. 8 Statistics Canada, 2018. Statistics Canada’s focus on geography series, 2016. Available from: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/fogs-spg/Index-eng.cfm Accessed December 11, 2017. 9 Province of Ontario, 2018. Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for the broader public sector. Available from: https://www.ontario.ca/data/energy-use-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions-broader-public-sector. Accessed December, 2017. 10 The County of Simcoe, 2015. Annual report, solid waste management strategy. Available from: https://www.simcoe.ca/SolidWasteManagement/Documents/Strategyper cent20Reportper cent20Finalper cent20(forper cent20Website).pdf. Accessed January 5, 2018. 11 Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Government of Ontario, 2018. Why we need to fight climate change. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Printed in Ontario, Canada. Available from https://www.ontario.ca/page/ministry-environment- and-climate-change. Accessed April 4, 2018. 12 Impact of climate change, weather extremes, and price risk on global food supply. Haile, M.G., Wossen, T., Tesfaye, K. et al. EconDisCliCha (2017) 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-017-0005-2

References and endnotes References 13 Government of Canada, 2017. Municipal solid waste and greenhouse gases. Available from https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/municipal-solid/greenhouse-gases.html Accessed December 12, 2018. 14 Unites States Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. Energy and the environment, greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator. Accessed May 15, 2018. 15 Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Government of Ontario, 2017. Strategy for a Waste-Free Ontario: Building the Circular Economy. Available from https://files.ontario.ca/finalstrategywastefreeont_eng_aoda1_final-s.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2018. 31 32

Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) and the Sustainability Committee (SC)

Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) is a regional sustainability program supported by seven municipalities in the County of Simcoe and the District Municipality of Muskoka including the Towns of Midland and Penetanguishene, and the Townships of Georgian Bay, Severn, Oro-Medonte, Tiny and Tay. This project also receives in-kind support and Sustainability Committee (SC) representation from the North Simcoe Community Futures Development Corporation / Société d’aide au développement des collectivités Simcoe Nord (NSCFDC), the Severn Sound Environmental Association (SSEA), the Simcoe-Muskoka District Health Unit (SMDHU) and the County of Simcoe. The SC serves as an advisory committee to SSS by supporting the SSS objectives to: (1) educate municipalities and their communities on sustainable practices and policies and connect them to resources, tools and funding, (2) advance the adoption of practices/policies within municipal operations to support climate change action, greenhouse gas mitigation and sustainable communities, and (3) advocate for sustainable environmental, social and economic practices and policies at the direction of the partner municipalities.

C. 2018 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS). All Rights Reserved. This preparation of this plan was carried out with assistance from the Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program (MCIP), a fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the authors, FCM and the Government of Canada accept no responsibility for them. This plan was prepared by Tracy Roxborough and Victoria Ervick of SSS.

2 Sustainable Severn Sound and the Sustainability Committee ...... 2 Background...... 4 Table 1. The PCP program framework...... 4 Alignment with existing plans and policies...... 5 GHG emissions ...... 6 Figure 1. Per cent (%) of total regional GHG emissions, per municipality, 2015...... 6

Figure 2. Tay’s total GHG emission (tCO2e), 2015...... 6 GHG emissions per capita...... 7

Table 2. Per capita GHG emissions (tCO2e) per municipality, 2015...... 7 Community GHG emissions...... 8

Table 3. Tay’s community GHG emissions (tCO2e) per sector, 2015...... 8 Figure 3. Community GHG emissions (per cent) per municipality as contributed to the regional total, 2015 . . 8 Figure 4. Tay’s community GHG emissions (per cent) per sector, 2015...... 8 Community GHG forecast, 2015-2028 ...... 9 Figure 5. Community GHG emissions forecast, 2015-2028 ...... 9 Community GHG emissions reduction target to 2028 ...... 9 Corporate GHG emissions ...... 10

Table 4. Tay’s corporate GHG emissions (tCO2e) per sector, 2015...... 10 Figure 6. Corporate GHG emissions (per cent) as contributed per municipality, 2015 ...... 10

Contents Figure 7. Tay’s corporate GHG emissions (per cent) per municipality, 2015...... 10 Corporate GHG emissions forecast, 2015-2028...... 11 Figure 8. Corporate GHG emission forecast, 2015-2028...... 11 Corporate GHG emissions reduction target to 2028...... 11 Table 5. Tay’s Top 5 GHG emitting facilities and estimated energy cost, 2015...... 12 Opportunities for reducing corporate GHG emissions ...... 13 Actions and recommendations...... 13 Table 6. Actions to reduce GHG emissions, 2019-2028...... 14-15 Table 7. Additional actions to reduce corporate GHG emissions ...... 16 Summary ...... 17 Links and resources...... 18 Contact...... 19

3 Background

In collaboration with our municipal and community partners, SSS released the area’s first Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP): Regional Greenhouse Gas (GHG ) Summary in June 2018. The LCCAP includes both a corporate and community inventory of GHG emissions for each of our municipal partners including: Midland, Penetanguishene, Georgian Bay, Severn, Oro-Medonte, Tiny and Tay; identifies regional GHG reduction targets to be achieved by 2028, and recommends 18 high-level actions to reduce municipal and community contributions to climate change.

On March 14, 2018, your Council further demonstrated Tay’s commitment to taking action on climate change and approved a model resolution put forth by SSS to join the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program. The PCP program is a national network of municipal governments working to address climate change, and is a joint initiative between FCM and ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability. The PCP network includes over 350 Canadian municipalities, each working in alignment with the PCP’s 5 milestone performance-based framework (Table 1) for reducing GHG emissions. In July 2018, the Township of Tay successfully achieved Milestone 1 of the program and is in the position to move rapidly to Milestone 3 with the guidance of SSS.

Up to half of Canada’s GHG emissions are under the influence of municipal governments. By reducing GHG emissions from municipal operations and in the larger community, Tay will receive multiple benefits, such as reduced resource (energy, water) expenses, healthier communities, more resilient infrastructure and reduced impact on the environment. In order to accomplish this, support and buy-in is needed by Council, municipal staff, and the citizens of Tay.

Table 1. The PCP program framework

Milestone Status

Milestone 1 – Creating a GHG emissions inventory and forecast Achieved Jul-2018

Milestone 2 – Setting an emissions reduction target In-progress

Milestone 3 – Develop a local action plan In-progress

Milestone 4 – Implementing a local action plan or set of activities Expected 2020 & on-going

Milestone 5 – Progress and reporting results 2020 & on-going 4 Alignment with existing plans and policies

The LCCAP, this municipal-level climate change action plan and Tay’s PCP membership commitment supports a number of key strategic plans within the Township including: 1. Township of Tay’s corporate strategic plan and the Township’s goal to, ‘build a strong and collaborative community, provide value for money spent and to establish priorities to preserve and protect the environment, waterfront, heritage, character and lifestyles of Tay’. 2. The Township’s Energy Conservation and Demand Energy Management (CDM) Plan (requirements anticipated to be amended under Ontario’s Electricity Act (re: O. Reg. 397/11: Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plans), 3. Tay’s Asset Management Plan (AMP) (re: O. Reg. 588/17: Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure), and 4. Official Plan (re:Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017, Section 4.2.10).

Recognizing the recent changes to O. Reg 397/11, the Township of Tay will still be required to report annually on its facility energy consumption and associated GHG emissions under the amended Electricity Act. The Township is legislated to update its CDM Plan and to have a Strategic Asset Management Policy in place by July 2019, which is to include vulnerabilities that may be caused by climate change to the municipality’s infrastructure assets. Beyond these requirements, these efforts are considered best practice, and are being adopted by municipalities in Ontario and across Canada.

5 GHG emissions

As presented in the LCCAP, the Township of Tay’s total GHG emissions account for approximately 8% of the area’s total emissions (Figure 1). This 1 equates to 41,052 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) , with corporate emissions accounting for 1% (898 tCO2e) of Tay’s total GHG emissions and community GHG emissions accounting for 99% at 40,154 tCO2e (Figure 2).

898 21% 26% MIDLAND PENETANGUISHENE COMMUNITY GHG

TINY EMISSIONS (tCO2e) 6% TAY SEVERN CORPORATE GHG EMISSIONS (tCO e) 12% 13% GEORGIAN BAY 2 ORO-MEDONTE 8% 14% 40,154

Figure 1. Per cent (%) of total regional GHG emissions, per municipality, 2015 Figure 2. Tay’s total GHG emission (tCO2e), 2015

1 Carbon dioxide equivalent is a measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based upon their global warming potential. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018. Available from: www.oecd.org 6 GHG emissions per capita

Measuring GHG emissions on a per capita basis allows us to examine and benchmark the emissions of each municipality relative to its population. 2 With a recorded population of 10,033 (Statistics Canada, 2016) the Township of Tay emitted approximately 4.09 tCO2e per capita. As shown in Table 2, Tay has the lowest per capita GHG emission rate compared amongst our 7 municipal partners. It is important to note that it is the absolute amount of GHG emissions that ultimately affects the environment. For example, an area with a high per capita emission rate but a small population (Georgian Bay) could produce fewer emissions than one with a lower per capita emission rate and larger population (Tay). Therefore, there are still several opportunities to significantly reduce both corporate and community GHG emissions. As compared to the majority of the world’s countries and population, Canadians and Ontarians have some of the world’s highest per capita emissions, higher than most other developed countries, even other northern countries with cold climates. To contribute to the GHG emission target of 80% less by 2050 as set by 3 the Federal government, Ontario’s emissions in 2050 will have to be less than 2 tCO2e per person . This will require a significant transformation in the way we live and how we use energy.

Table 2. Per capita GHG emissions (tCO2e) per municipality, 2015

Permanent population Total GHG emissions, 2015 Per capita emissions, Municipality (Census 2016, Statistics (corporate + community) including corporate (tCO e) Canada) 2

Georgian Bay 2,499 33,784 13.51

Midland 16,864 136,323 8.08

COMMUNITY GHG Penetanguishene 8,962 68,805 7.67 EMISSIONS (tCO e) 2 Tiny 11,787 74,024 6.28

CORPORATE GHG Oro-Medonte 21,036 108,159 5.14

EMISSIONS (tCO2e) Severn 13,477 63,078 4.75

Tay 10,033 41,052 4.09

AVERAGE 7.07 Figure 2. Tay’s total GHG emission (tCO2e), 2015 2 Statistics Canada, Census Profile, 2016 Census. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp pd/prof/details/ pagecfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=3543071&Geo2=CD&Code2=3543&Data=Count&SearchText=tay&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&TABID=1 3 The Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, 2018. Climate action in Ontario: What’s next? Available from: https://eco.on.ca/reports/2018-climate-action-in-ontario/ 7 Community GHG emissions Table 3. Tay’s community GHG emissions (tCO2e) per sector, 2015

Following the PCP’s program Canadian Supplement to the International Emissions Analysis GHG % of total Protocol, community energy use and emissions were reported by sector (transportation, Sector emissions community residential, solid waste, commercial and institutional, and industrial) and collected for the (tCO2e) emissions baseline year of 2015. The Township of Tay’s community GHG emissions account for 8% of Transportation 18,519 46% the area’s total community emissions (Figure 3), being the 6th highest, or 2nd lowest, GHG emitter out of the 7 municipalities inventoried. Residential 12,913 32%

As illustrated in Table 3, transportation is the largest emitter of GHGs, accounting for 46% Waste 6,305 16% (18,519 tCO2e) of Tay’s total community emissions. The personal vehicle, in large part, remains the dominant method of choice for travel in our area, which can be attributed Commercial 2,053 5% to the largely rural setting of the community. SSS and the Township of Tay recommend residents to consider altneratives to the obvious choice, such as telecommuting, Industrial 364 1% carpooling, biking, walking or public transit, when possible. Total 40,154 100%

MIDLAND 1% 5% PENETANGUISHENE 21% 26% TINY 16% TRANSPORTATION TAY RESIDENTIAL 6% SEVERN 46% WASTE GEORGIAN BAY COMMERCIAL ORO-MEDONTE INDUSTRIAL 12% 13% 32% Figure 3. Community GHG emissions Figure 4. Tay’s community GHG 8% 14% (per cent) per municipality as emissions (per cent) per sector, 2015 contributed to the regional total, 2015

The residential sector was the 2nd largest emitter of community emissions in 2015. GHG emissions from energy use was approximately 12,913 tCO2e which is equivalent to 277,996 GJ of energy consumption. Moving forward, SSS will explore opportunities to work with the community to encourage a reduction in the amount of electricity and natural gas used in our homes through conservation, improved efficiency, and the use of renewable energy sources. We also encourage the Township of Tay to consider a strong planning policy that supports more sustainable homes, developments and neighbourhoods that exceeds Building Code and/or Planning Act requirements.

8 Community GHGemissionsforecast, 2015-2028 Community GHGemissionsreductiontarget to 2028 tCO

target is6%lessby2028. This target represents anabsoluteemissionsreductionof 2,678lesstCO Based uponthelimitedinfluencethat the Township of Tay hason community GHGemissions,therecommended community GHGreduction In 2015,40,154tCO the community by2028. allow anadditional3,700tCO crease over 2015GHGemissionlevels would 2028, ifnosignificant actionistaken. This in- expected to grow to 43,854tCO as-ususal (BAU) operations, GHGemissionsare result of that increaseandconsidering business- annual population growth rate to 2028.Asa GHG emissionforecast isprojected pera0.68% Simcoe OfficialPlan,the Township’s community Schedule 7of theGrowth PlanandtheCounty of mately 11,400by2031from 2011,ascontained in increase of theTownship’s population to approxi- solid waste generation. Basedupontheprojected sions created asaresultof transportation and tional andindustrialsectors, andtheGHGemis- energy usedinresidential, commercial, institu- community day-to-day activities,includingthe 2 e, representing a2028target of 37,746 tCO • • • Installing 3,935 residential solarhot water systems. Replacing11,80420-year-old refrigerators withnewmodels Removing 590cars from theroad 2 e wereemittedthrough 2 e to be emitted by e to beemittedby 2 e, orby9.2 %by 2 e. Achieving thistarget would beequivalent to: Figure 5. Business-as-usualGHGforecast 20,000 60,000 Tonnes of GHGs Community GHGemissions forecast, 2015-2028 2015

6%community GHGreduction 2 e relative to 2015baselineemissions of 40,154 Years

2015 baselineGHGemissions 37,746 40,154 43,854 2028 Corporate GHG emissions Table 4. Tay’s corporate GHG emissions (tCO2e) per sector, 2015 This municipal climate change action plan includes recommendations to reduce energy and GHG % of total emissions from municipal operations including fleet, water and wastewater, buildings and Sector emissions community facilities, solid waste, and streetlights. The corporate data inventoried focuses exclusively on (tCO2e) emissions energy and GHG emissions that are directly controlled by the Township. It does not include emissions that are a consequence of activities from sources not controlled or owned by the Fleet 342 38% Township (including third-party contractors, construction activities, business, or air travel) or those that occur outside Tay’s geographical boundary. Water & wastewater 309 34%

In 2015, the baseline year, the Township of Tay’s total corporate energy use was Buildings & facilities 217 24% approximately 27,124 GJ. This is equivalent to 898 tCO e and accounts for approximately 2 Streetlights 16 2% 15% of the region’s total corporate emissions as presented in the LCCAP (Table 4 and Figure 5). Tay’s total corporate emissions are generated from the use of diesel, gasoline, electricity Solid waste 14 2% and natural gas. In comparison, the Township of Tiny’s municipal GHG emissions accounted for 15% of the regional corporate total, while Penetanguishene’s corporate GHG emissions Total 898 100% account for 13% of the regional corporate total.

As illustrated in Table 4 and Figure 7, the Township’s GHG emissions predominately stem from fleet (38%) and infrastructure related to water and wastewater (34%). Most water and wastewater emissions are generated from electricity and natural gas, used to heat and power each of the Township’s 39 water related buildings, while fleet emissions are generated from diesel and gasoline consumption. Of Tay’s top 5 GHG emitting buildings and facilities, two are related to water and wastewater infrastructure (Table 5), and make up approximately 27% (251 tCO2e) of Tay’s total corporate emissions.

2% 6% MIDLAND 2% 9% PENETANGUISHENE FLEET 28% TINY WATER & 24% TAY 38% WASTEWATER 13% SEVERN BUILDINGS GEORGIAN BAY STREETLIGHTS ORO-MEDONTE WASTE 13% 15% Figure 6. Corporate GHG emissions 34% Figure 7. Tay’s corporate GHG 16% (per cent) as contributed per emissions (per cent) per sector, 2015 municipality, 2015 10 Corporate GHG emissions forecast, 2015-2028

In 2015, the Township’s corporate GHG emissions 1500 were 898 tCO2e as a result of day-to-day municipal operations. Based upon the projected increase of 983 the Townhip’s population to approximately 11,400 by 2031 from 2011, as contained in Schedule 7 of the 898 Growth Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan, the Township’s corporate GHG forecast is 675 projected per a 0.68% population increase to 2028. As a result of that increase and considering BAU Tonnes of GHGs GHGs of Tonnes operations, corporate GHG emissions are expected 0 to grow to 983 tCO2e, or by 9.5% by 2028. As GHG emissions are directly correlated to energy costs, Years 2015 the expectation is that municipal expenses would 2028 also increase relative to this increase of GHGs. Business-as-usual GHG forecast 25% corporate GHG reduction 2015 baseline GHG emissions Under the Paris Agreement, Canada has commit- ted to reducing GHG emissions by 30% below 2005 Figure 8. Corporate GHG emission forecast, 2015-2028 levels by 20305. The 25% target to be achieved by the Township remains consistent with the selected Federal target.

Corporate GHG emissions reduction target to 2028

SSS has recommended that Council support a corporate GHG emissions reduction target of 25% below 2015 levels by 2028. This target represents an absolute emissions reduction of 223 tCO2e relative to 2015 baseline emissions, having the Township strive to emit no more than 675 total tCO2e from corporate activities in 2028, and is equivalent to: • Removing 71 cars from the road. • Replacing 1,412 20-year-old refrigerators with new models. • Installing 471 residential solar hot water systems6.

5 Government of Canada, 2018. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators/progress-towards-canada-greenhouse-gas-emissions-reduction-target.html 6 Equivalent calculations produced from the calculations derived from the Partners for Climate Protection Tool (PCP Milestone Tool) per the selection of an absolute 31% GHG reduction from 215-2028 for the Township of Tay. 11 Based on Ontario’s average historical cost for electricity in 2015 and the average commodity price* for natural gas paid by Tay in 2015, the Town-ship spent approximately $338,864 on energy consumption for their top 5 buildings alone in the baseline year. Achieving a 25% GHG reduction target would result in a projected cost-savings of up-to approximately $847,161 from the top 5 buildings and facilities alone7 over the next ten years, or $84,716 per year. This is a conservative estimate8, which considers average annual costs for buildings and facilities only, with the opportunity for greater cost savings highly likely if the targets are achieved and GHG emissions are reduced across each of the 5 sectors.

Table 5. Tay’s top 5 GHG emitting facilities and estimated energy cost, 2015

Total Energy usage square GHG emissions Municipal operation Address Kilowatts per feet Cubic metre (m3) (tCO e) per facility hour (kWh) 2 (sq.ft)

Port McNicoll WWTP 551 First Ave. 6114 1,764,585 56,307 178

Tay Treatment Plant 45 Lighthouse Cres. 7815 558,422 26,801 73

Garage 450 Park St. 13,735 47,472 30,353 59

Administrative office 450 Park St. 7804 110,768 17,336 37

Oakwood Community 290 Park St. 9354 67,527 12,817 26 Centre

Total 2,548,774 143,614 373

Estimated total cost ($)* $317,322 $21,542 $338,864

*Estimates are based on commodity price and do not include fixed or semi-fixed costs (i.e. delivery charges, etc.) 7 This projection uses 2015 historical costs and does not include expected energy cost increases, price fluctuations, nor hedge/spot market billing scenarios. The projected cost savings is only representative of the buildings and facilities sector and does not include opportunities within the other 4 sectors ((1) fleet, (2) streetlights, (3) waste, (4) water and sewage). 8 This estimate assumes average building and facilities energy costs of $338,864 per year over 10 years, for a total of $3,388,640 in costs, with a direct 25% reduction in those costs presented as a result of the achieved 25% reduction in corporate GHG emissions.

12 Opportunities for reducing corporate GHG emissions As part of the implementation plan, SSS staff will review Tay’s long-term and annual capital budgets on an on-going basis to identify opportunities to reduce corporate GHG emissions. Moving forward, SSS will provide recommendations as to what scheduled projects and/or plans have the potential to reduce GHG emissions, how those initiatives may result in additional GHG reductions through enhanced sustainability options, and will work closely with municipal staff to integrate these recommendations into municipal operations, policies and procedures as feasible. With that being said, as changes to policy, legislation, technology, climate and/or other changes occur, the recommended actions will evolve. Some of the recommendations are directly aligned with Tay’s Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan, Asset Management Plan and/or Strategic Plan, and all have positive environmental, social and economic outcomes. Actions and recommendations

Table 6 lists the actions SSS and the Sustainability Committee have identified to guide the Township in meeting their 25% corporate and 6% community GHG reduction targets. These recommendations will be updated every 5 years by SSS and the Sustainability Committee to reflect new projects and GHG emission reduction opportunities. Implementation costs

For the purpose of this plan, four expenditure categories were used to estimate the total cost associated with the implementation of each action in Table 6.

Capital Capital expenditures by local jurisdictions are typically for projects and programs related to ocal jurisdictional operations, such as installing solar photovoltaics (PV) on municipal facilities, or bike lane construction. Salary Represents the personnel costs required to implement CAP activities. Salary costs were estimated at staff hours per action. Consultants Municipalities often hire external consultants to support the implementation of climate plan actions. Materials Some actions may require materials and supplies (i.e. brochures and meeting materials).

The cost is expressed as low ($ = less than $1,000), moderate ($$ = more than $1,000 but less than $5,000), medium ($$$ = more than $5,000 but less than $10,000), high ($$$$ = more than $10,000 but less than $20,000), ICA (more than $20,000). If the cost of any action is estimated as more than $20,000, this will automatically require the preparation and municipal review of an ICA, either provided by SSS or by Township staff. As relevant, the expected return on investment (ROI) will also be considered by both SSS and the municipality prior to implementation. 13 Table 6. Actions to reduce GHG emissions, 2019-2028

tCO2e re- Implementa- Recommended action items Year EOI Department lead Secondary Lead duction by tion cost*** 2028**

Include updates of municipal & community energy consumption & climate messaging in regular newsletters, water bills & tax bills Spring/fall, 2019 Communications CAO N/a $

Consider recommendations to update Emergency Management Plans to include climate change impacts (i.e., extreme weather, wildfire, flooding, etc.) June/July, 2019 Emergency services CAO N/a $

Ensure business decisions & activities, including staff reports, bids, tenders & contracts - include climate change considerations involving the energy Mar-May, 2019 CAO All/multiple Med: 45 $$ efficiency & expected GHG impact of that decision &/or activity, & how it relates to the Tay’s PCP program commitment

Include GHG inventories, GHG targets & climate change action items into Official Plans & municipal Strategic Plans (i.e., Council strategic plans, AT, transit, parks & February, 2019 & CAO All/multiple N/a $ recreation, master plans, etc.) on-going

Include climate change language & influence of management decisions on GHG emissions in a new Asset Management Policy as part of 2019 AMP update April, 2019 Finance Public works N/a $

Prepare an inventory of municipal buildings & their associated energy audit status (not-completed, completed, implemented, etc.) & utilize this inventory May, 2019+ Finance Public works High: 55 $$ in the update of the municipalities' CDM Plan in 2019, complete further actions as feasible - prioritizing top 5 GHG emission sources (see Table 5)

Develop a 'no-mow' & complementary pollinator policy with municipal commitments to improve the environment for pollinators & reduce corporate fuel use 2020 Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 $$

Designate warming centres for winter, designate cooling centres for summer, & ensure on-site cooling locations for summer festivals & events 2021 Emergency services Communications N/a $

Develop a Sustainable Fleet Management Plan to reduce GHGs associated with corporate transportation 2021 Finance Public works High: 55 $$$

Investigate the feasibility of completing building & facility waste audits, complete audits & implement recommendations as deemed feasible 2022 Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 $$$$

Prepare a Water Conservation & Management Plan to reduce corporate & community water use & to minimize the risk for flooding & drought 2022 Public works Communications Low: 10 $$$$

Complete a climate change vulnerability & risk assessment 2023 Public works Parks/recreation N/a $$

Establish a Corporate Energy Revolving Fund* to finance corporate energy retrofit projects (i.e. revenues could be generated by renewable projects, energy inven- 2023 Finance CAO N/a $$ tive savings, & a percentage of savings generated by externally funded energy reduction projects)

Establish a local municipally-owned & managed forest plot to supply municipal & community tree planting projects (i.e., 1 hectare) 2024+ Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 ICA

Develop a community & corporate energy plan 2025+ Planning Public works N/a ICA

* The concept is to develop a sustainable municipal fund that is derived from a portion of the cost-savings achieved as a result of energy efficiency projects, renewable energy savings, energy grants &/or rebates, etc. , to finance GHG reduction & energy conservation projects.

14 LEGEND

tCO2e re- Implementa- Recommended action items Year EOI Department lead Secondary Lead duction by tion cost*** Priority (Light Green = Highest) 2028**

Include updates of municipal & community energy consumption & climate messaging in regular newsletters, water bills & tax bills Spring/fall, 2019 Communications CAO N/a $ Ease of implementation (EOI) Consider recommendations to update Emergency Management Plans to include climate change impacts (i.e., extreme weather, wildfire, flooding, etc.) June/July, 2019 Emergency services CAO N/a $ ‘quick-win’, medium, hard, difficult

Ensure business decisions & activities, including staff reports, bids, tenders & contracts - include climate change considerations involving the energy Mar-May, 2019 CAO All/multiple Med: 45 $$ efficiency & expected GHG impact of that decision &/or activity, & how it relates to the Tay’s PCP program commitment GHG reduction potential Include GHG inventories, GHG targets & climate change action items into Official Plans & municipal Strategic Plans (i.e., Council strategic plans, AT, transit, parks & February, 2019 & CAO All/multiple N/a $ Low: Equal to or less than 1% GHG reduction, recreation, master plans, etc.) on-going estimated at approximately 10 tCO2e less Med: Equal to or less than 5% GHG reduction, Include climate change language & influence of management decisions on GHG emissions in a new Asset Management Policy as part of 2019 AMP update April, 2019 Finance Public works N/a $ estimated at approximately 45 tCO2e less High: Greater than 5% GHG reduction, estimated at Prepare an inventory of municipal buildings & their associated energy audit status (not-completed, completed, implemented, etc.) & utilize this inventory May, 2019+ Finance Public works High: 55 $$ approximately 55 tCO e or more in the update of the municipalities' CDM Plan in 2019, complete further actions as feasible - prioritizing top 5 GHG emission sources (see Table 5) 2 NA: No estimate available

Develop a 'no-mow' & complementary pollinator policy with municipal commitments to improve the environment for pollinators & reduce corporate fuel use 2020 Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 $$

Designate warming centres for winter, designate cooling centres for summer, & ensure on-site cooling locations for summer festivals & events 2021 Emergency services Communications N/a $

Total corporate GHG emissions (tCO2e) per 2015 898 Develop a Sustainable Fleet Management Plan to reduce GHGs associated with corporate transportation 2021 Finance Public works High: 55 $$$ baseline

Investigate the feasibility of completing building & facility waste audits, complete audits & implement recommendations as deemed feasible 2022 Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 $$$$ Total GHG reduced (estimated tCO2e) through 195 implementation of the action items Prepare a Water Conservation & Management Plan to reduce corporate & community water use & to minimize the risk for flooding & drought 2022 Public works Communications Low: 10 $$$$ Estimated GHG reductions by 2028 21% Complete a climate change vulnerability & risk assessment 2023 Public works Parks/recreation N/a $$

Additional GHG reduction (tCO2e) potential through 86 Establish a Corporate Energy Revolving Fund* to finance corporate energy retrofit projects (i.e. revenues could be generated by renewable projects, energy inven- 2023 Finance CAO N/a $$ low-level implementation of Table 7 actions tive savings, & a percentage of savings generated by externally funded energy reduction projects) Total achievable GHG reductions by 2028 25% Establish a local municipally-owned & managed forest plot to supply municipal & community tree planting projects (i.e., 1 hectare) 2024+ Parks/recreation Public works Low: 10 ICA

Develop a community & corporate energy plan 2025+ Planning Public works N/a ICA

* The concept is to develop a sustainable municipal fund that is derived from a portion of the cost-savings achieved as a result of energy efficiency projects, renewable energy savings, energy grants &/or rebates, ** Low estimates of GHG reductions are presented, actual GHG reductions are anticipated to be 15-20% higher than estimated. etc. , to finance GHG reduction & energy conservation projects. *** These estimates for implementation include consideration for costs associated with capital, salary, consultant & materials/supplies. The cost is expressed as low ($ = less than $1,000), moderate ($$ = more than $1,000 but less than $5,000), medium ($$$ = more than $5,000 but less than $10,000), high ($$$$ = more than $10,000 but less than $20,000), & ICA (more than $20,000). It should be noted that the majority of actions are not ‘stand-alones,’ in that most align with required municipal activities, either as existing work plan items, or as anticipated items required per Provincial legislation 15 Table 7. Additional actions to reduce corporate GHG emissions

List of actions Appox. cost of implementa- Estimated GHG reduction potential tion* per action (one-time reduction) Adoption of climate change policies and GHG emissions considerations in all municipal $ plans & documents LOW 10 (tCO2e) of GHGs reduced Adding or rearranging windows for increased daylight in retrofits & new builds $-$$$ Equal to or less than 1% GHG reduction, Adoption of green driving policy (i.e., anti-idling, right-sizing, car-pooling, telecommuting, $ estimated at approximately 10 tCO2e or less etc.) Employee training and awareness program to conserve water, energy & resources $$ MED 45 (tCO2e) of GHGs reduced Environmental stewardship or conservation actions (i.e., tree planting & preservation, Equal to or less than 5% GHG reduction, $-$$$$ habitat enhancements, etc.) estimated at approximately 45 tCO2e or less Install occupancy sensors to control interior building or facility lighting $-$$ HIGH 55 (tCO2e) of GHGs reduced Install/add exterior lighting control for buildings & facilities $$-$$$ Install low-flow faucets with sensors & automatic shut-offs $-$$ Greater than 5% GHG reduction, estimated at approximately 55 tCO e or more Purchase/replace office equipment with energy efficient models $-$$ 2 Replace weather-stripping for doors & windows $-$$ N/a Use cool/white roofs on buildings & facilities $$$-ICA No estimate available Seal building(s) or facility with caulking or spray foam $-$$ Upgrade indoor lighting systems $$-$$$$ Vehicle replacement with a hybrid, electric, or alternative fuel vehicle ICA Add insulation in building(s) or facility $-$$$ Add solar thermal water heaters for recreation facilities $$$-$$$$ Install sub-metering (building monitoring system) $$$-$$$$ Operator (building) training to optimize performance & return-on-investment $$ Renovation/reconfiguring building or facility interior $$$-ICA Replace window glazing & doors $$-$$$$ Retrofit/replace supply fan motor & variable frequency drives (VFDs) in buildings & facilities $$-$$$$ Update inefficient heating/furnaces & cooling systems $$$-ICA Upgrade outdoor lighting systems $$-ICA Add Demand Controlled Ventilation for larger buildings and facilities $$-$$$ Replace the roof, considering green roof, solar shingles, renewable technologies, etc. $$$-ICA *The cost is expressed as low ($ = less than $1,000), moderate ($$ = Install electric vehicle (EV) charging station(s) $$ more than $1,000 but less than $5,000), medium ($$$ = more than $5,000 but less than $10,000), high ($$$$ = more than $10,000 but less Install solar photo-voltaic (PV) systems or solar thermal installations for buildings or facilities $$$$-ICA than $20,000), & ICA (more than $20,000). These are estimates only, Replace heating, ventilation &/or air-conditioning system (HVACs) with a renewable ICA as the cost will be impacted by a number of factors, including fees & technology (i.e., ground-source heat pump) services, project scope, size & location of project, or facility, & varying Replace HVACs with more energy efficient models (i.e., radiant, chilled beams, cost, quality & availability of materials, etc. ICA displacement or natural ventilation, water-source heat pumps)

16 Summary

The regional LCCAP and your municipal-level action plan puts your municipality in a position to take results-driven action towards your 25% corporate and 6% community GHG reduction targets while also working towards your on-going Township priorities. This document builds upon the work already completed by the Township (i.e. energy and water conservation efforts, building upgrades, and streetlight replacements) and encourages these actions to continue through a lens that supports GHG emission reduction.

Many GHG and energy reduction actions are being pursued within existing municipal work plans and in many cases through initiatives driven by co-benefit priorities (i.e., cost-savings through retrofits and improvements, protection of land and water, multi-modal communities). As your municipalities’ Associate Member of the PCP program, SSS has committed to completing Milestones 2 and 3 on behalf of the Township and SSS staff will continue to:

1. Submit formal reports to the PCP Secretariat every 2 years on behalf of the Township, documenting Tay’s achievements in the PCP program to meet membership requirements,

2. Submit progress reports to the PCP program Secretariat to track actions and provide recognition as the Township advances through the milestone framework, and

3. Complete an annual PCP Members Survey, which will provide FCM with information that can be used to recognize the Township of Tay’s achievements in FCM’s yearly National Measures Report.

17 Acknowledgements

SSS and the Sustainability Committee would like to thank the Township of Tay, especially Councillor Catherine Root and CAO Mr. Robert Lamb, the Council and staff PCP program point-of-contacts, respectively, for supporting climate change action within the municipality. The insight and support provided by Councillor Root and Township representatives has allowed SSS and the SC to succeed in delivering on our goal to complete the LCCAP, and to develop your municipal-level climate change action plan, establishing the framework for climate change action within the municipality.

Links and resources

1. Sustainable Severn Sound https://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/ 2. SSS’s Local Climate Change Action Plan: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Summary https://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/about-page.php?id=3 3. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Partners for Climate Protection program https://fcm.ca/home/programs/partners-for-climate-protection.htm 4. Canadian Supplement to the International Emissions Analysis Protocol https://fcm.ca/Documents/reports/PCP/PCP_Protocol_Canadian_Supplement_EN.pdf 5. Township of Tay, Official Plan, 2018 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zzNNDngWGCbiklkZfeUxEYGjn8RJpg86 6. Township of Tay, Strategic Plan, 2015-2018 https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0yPSaaMSvkOdUppdnZuaEFSZDQ7 7. Township of Tay, Energy Conservation and Demand Energy Management (CDM) Plan, 2014-2019 https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0yPSaaMSvkOX3M1VURiTUJ2YjQ 8. Township of Tay, Asset Management Plan (AMP), 2013 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tCQo70RO74If9FgUQDXVSUCsOnK30Sck 9. O. Reg. 397/11: Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plans (anticipated to be amended under Ontario’s Electricity Act*) https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r11397 10. Ontario’s Electricity Act* https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/98e15 11. O. Reg. 588/17: Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r17588 12. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017 http://placestogrow.ca/index.php?Itemid=14&id=430&option=com_content&task=view#4.2.10

PCP representative Mr. Robert Lamb, CAO, accepts the PCP recognition statue from Ian McVey, Regional PCP program representative, June 2018. 18 Contact information

Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) and the Sustainability Committee P.O. Box 8, 105 Fourth Street Midland, ON L4R 4K6 P: 705.526.1371 x. 112 E: [email protected] W: www.sustainablesevernsound.ca

Connect with us on social media

@SustainableSevernSound https://www.facebook.com/SustainableSevernSound/

@sustainsevsound

19 20

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-16

Report Title: Monthly Activity Report – Water Wastewater Operations

ORIGIN: Superintendent of Water & Wastewater Operations for the period of January 30 to February 28, 2019.

TREATMENT PLANTS: The Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks (MECP) annual Compliance Inspection of the Tay Area Drinking Water Treatment & Distribution systems has been received. Further to this inspection we and our design engineer met with the MECP to discuss operational concerns bought up by the MECP inspection on February 8, 2019. After our meeting we contacted the manufacture of our Water Treatment equipment to assist us with addressing the concerns the MECP.

It was determined after consultation with the manufacture that the membrane testing we were conducting substantially exceeded what was required by our MECP approval and we have now made a number of minor modifications to our testing procedures to address the MECP issues as follows;

Our response to the concerns was as follows;

1. As requested we now have a separate log book for the Membrane Integrity Test (MIT) testing records which includes information of the specific rack(s) that were tested and the pass/fail result of each test.

2. The manufacture has adjusted the Membrane Integrity Test (MIT) to ensure we met 3.4 log removal efficiency based on a pressure decay of 5.6 kpa instead over 300 seconds instead of the former pressure decay of 2.1 kpa for 4 log removal over 300 seconds.

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-16

3. We have had the manufacture add to our daily report the actual log removal achieved for each filter and we have added a daily free chlorine CT (Concentration Time) calculation depicting the worst case scenario for the day to address the MECP concerns.

DISTRIBUTION & COLLECTIONS SYSTEMS: We experienced one watermain break during the month of February on Veterans Lane likely due in part to the limited snow coverage and temperature fluctuation. The break occurred after the isolation valve for hydrant 577 across from the legion in Victoria Harbour.

The improvements to the CNB Sewage Lift Station are now complete and new impellers with cutters have been installed. These have now been in operation for approximately a month and have greatly improved the flows through the lift station.

On February 4, 2019 due to a significant thaw we had a by-pass of approximately 900m³ at the Victoria Harbour Wastewater Treatment Plant over a period of approximately 2 hours. We reported this event to both the SMDHU and the Spills Action Centre as required by Ministry Guidelines. It should be noted that this event was very unusual as were receiving 185 L/s and our plant currently is only capable of handling 104L/s. Much of the excess flows were diverted to storage until we could no longer keep up with the inflow.

There were no sewage back-ups during this period.

ADVERSE DRINKING WATER: There were no adverse water quality incidences this reporting period.

Prepared By: Date Prepared: February 28, 2019

Mike Emms, Water/Wastewater Superintendent

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-16

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-18

Report Title: Monthly Activity Report Roads and Fleet

ORIGIN Manager of Roads and Fleet from February 1, 2019 to February 28, 2019.

OPERATIONS Staff have been completing service requests and correcting deficiencies noted through regular road patrolling. There were several hazardous tree removals and storm cleanups done early January. Staff have also been doing minor repairs and maintenance to the trucks and equipment.

WINTER CONTROL The Township responded to the twenty-two winter events. Some of these events were freezing rain which can be extremely challenging. The mild weather and rain also makes the gravel roads icy, so the grader was sent out with the ice blades to scrape and improve the surface on those roads. A breakdown of the winter events is as follows:

Nine events were sanding only, four events were plowing only, two events grader only and nine events were plowing and sanding. Road patrol was out nightly, there were several occasions where road patrol did an additional patrol during the day time due to weather observations.

WINTER SAND Total of 3000 tonnes of winter control sand was stocked by February 6th. This should be sufficient for us to complete our winter control season.

FLEET All units are receiving regular maintenance, and various small repairs. The following are units were out of service for major repairs.

Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-18

Unit 12-21, tandem plow truck, out of service 1 week, plow wing Unit 06-15, tandem plow truck, out of service 2 weeks, out for repair fuel injection issues Unit 09-28, tractor was out of service for 2 days, hydraulic cylinder Unit 18-22, Grader, was out of service for 1 week, turbo hose Unit 13-26, Back-hoe, out of service for 3 weeks, driveline, hoe and engine issues.

FUEL TANKS Underground fuel tank annual inspection performed by TankTech. Tanks and hoses passed inspection, no deficiencies noted.

TENDERS The following tenders were posted during the month of February  Gravel Rehabilitation Closing March 1  Full Depth Reclamation Closing March 1  Double Surface Treatment Closing March 1  Line Painting Closing March 22  Fuel Closing March 29  Streetlight Replacement (RFQ) Closing April 1

UPCOMING WORK FOR MARCH  Complete service requests  Winter control  Prepare tenders for upcoming capital projects  Sign Retro-reflectivity inspections

MEETINGS  Public Works Mangers’ meeting  Simcoe County Road Supervisors meeting

Prepared By: Date Prepared: March 4, 2019

Lyell Bergstrome Manager of Roads & Fleet

Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-18

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Public Works

Chair: Councillor Barry Norris

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PW-2019-19

Report Title: Monthly Activity Report – Parks, Recreation & Facilities

ORIGIN Manager of Parks, Recreation & Facilities for the period of February 7, 2019 to March 6, 2019.

RECREATION Spring Recreation Guide The North Simcoe Recreation Guide was distributed through the Midland Mirror on Thursday February 21st. This guides covers program information and events from mid-March until mid-June. This year’s spring guide features information and registration details for the summer TOTS Soccer Program and Summer Day and Teen camp programs. To date, registration for all programs has gone quite well.

Port McNicoll Recreation Committee The Port McNicoll Recreation Committee had a great turnout on Saturday February 16th at their ‘Craftarama’ vendor show at the Port McNicoll Community Centre. Funds raised from the event will be going directly towards the groups youth initiatives. The temperatures were cold; however, the Committee was quite pleased with their first annual ‘Skatearama’ family fun event at the Tay Community Rink on Sunday February 17th. Next up for the group is a youth drop- in sports night scheduled for Friday March 8th. The group is also planning an Easter Egg hunt at the Port McNicoll Community Centre on Sunday April 7th.

Music in the Park Staff has begun compiling the line-up of artists for the annual Music in the Park program. The program runs on Friday evenings in Victoria Harbour and Sunday afternoons in Port McNicoll and Waubaushene for the months of July and August.

_____ Public Works 1 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-19

Youth Programs Each March Break the Township offers Home Alone and Babysitting Courses for area youth. The courses are put on by the local Community Emergency Response Team (C.E.R.T.). This year both programs are filled to capacity.

Youth Dances Youth dances are hosted by the Victoria Harbour Recreation Committee on the following dates from 7pm to 10pm. The fee is $5 at the door.

Oakwood Community Centre March 15, April 12, May 17.

PARKS Summer Staff Recruitment Recruitment has begun for various summer student employment opportunities within the Parks/Roads and Recreation divisions.

Outdoor Rinks The outdoor rinks closed during the final week of February after a successful season. Thanks goes out to all staff that worked tirelessly to keep them operational for approximately 6/7 weeks.

FACILITIES HVAC Unit – Oakwood Community Centre (front unit) The request for quotations (RFQ) document was created and posted to Biddingo on Friday March 1st. The RFQ closes on Friday March 29th. The hope is to have the new high efficiency heat/cool HVAC Unit installed before July.

Tay Community Rink Operations The Tay Community Rink had another busy month in February with a steady mix of free public time and booked private time. Of particular note was a large weekend booking from a local manufacturing company which used the facility to offer their employees various skating options (family skates and hockey games).

Ice Resurfacer The request for proposals (RFP) document was created and posted to Biddingo in early February. The RFP closed on Friday March 1st. Details regarding the proposals received will be provided in a separate report.

Miscellaneous Facility Work Port McNicoll Community Centre – Exterior Painting quotes are currently being sought for this project.

Tay Community Rink Penalty Boxes – Quotes are being updated for this project.

_____ Public Works 2 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-19

Council Chambers curtains – quotes have been received and work has been awarded.

Staff replaced all expiring adult and child AED pads at facility locations in which pads were close to expiration.

Date Prepared: March 6, 2019

Prepared By:

Bryan Anderson Manager of Parks, Recreation & Facilities

Dates to remember: TBD – Volunteer Appreciation Event May 17th – 19th - Portarama June 15th - Tay Bike Day June 21st & 22nd – Canada Day Celebrations November 24th – Santa Claus Parade December 1st – Township Tree Lighting Event

_____ Public Works 3 March 13, 2019 Report No. PW-2019-19

PORTARAMA FAMILY FESTIVAL c/o PO Box 490, 715 4th Ave, Port McNiicoll, Ontario L0K 1R0 [email protected] ~ www.portarama.ca

February 21, 2019

To: Mayor Ted Walker, Township of Tay Council Members c/o Alison Gray ‐ Clerk

Re: Portarama Family Festival 2018

Dear Mayor and Council:

On behalf of the Portarama Family Festival Committee I am writiing you to obtain perrmission to allow ATVs on specified roads to assist our committtee during the Paul Spencer Memorial Soapbox Derby this year, to be held Sunday May 19th (rain date May 20th) along Talbot Street.

As last year, our proposal is to use not more than four ATVs to pull the carts back to the staging area. Each ATV would pull no more than one cart at a time, and will NOT be carrying any passengers. All rules covering ORVs in the Ontario Highway Traffic Act (HTA) will be followed including licensing, insurance, speed limit and driver safety equipment. We feel this will be a safer alternative to using cars and/or trucks for this purpose.

Please consider our request and let us know your decission. If you have any concerns, please reach out to me directly so that I can discuss our request further.

Thank you for your ongoing support of the Portarama Family Festival.

Heather Delong Co – Chair, Portarama Committee

http://www.facebook.com/portarama

Planning & Development Committee March 13, 2019

Agenda

1. Call to Order:

2. Reports of Municipal Officials: 2.1 Report from the Director of Planning & Development Report No. PD-2019-12 Re: Planning & Development Director Update February 2019 2.2 Report from the Director of Planning & Development Report No. PD-2019-13 Re: Modification to Draft Plan Conditions for Heights of Victoria Harbour Draft Plan of Subdivision (File Number TA-T-90017) 2.3 Report from the Director of Planning & Development Report No. PD-2019-14 Re: 2019 Housekeeping Amendment to Zoning By-law 2000-57 2.4 Report from the Chief Building Official Report No. PD-2019-11 Re: Building Services Division Update – February 2019

3. Other Business: 3.1 Correspondence from Maxson Building Corporation Re: Building Permits – Victoria Woods Phase 4

4. Items for Information: 4.1 Correspondence from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing Re: Housing Supply Action Plan 4.2 Correspondence from the County of Simcoe Re: Seniors Housing Grant Program 4.3 Correspondence from a Resident to Jill Dunlop, MPP Re: Property Designation – Green Space

Planning & Development 1 March 13, 2019 Committee Agenda

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Planning and Development Committee

Chair: Councillor Mary Warnock

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report Number: PD-2019-12

Report Title: Planning and Development Director Update February 2019

The following are the highlights from February 1st, 2019 to February 28th, 2019:

Zoning Certificates 1. For the month of February, 9 applications, 8 were issued and 1 remains on hold for additional elevation drawings. The average review time was 1.4 days

Development 2. Staff reviewed the proposed Bill 66 and provided questions back to the Province for their consideration on the “Open for Business By-law”. Minister Clarke announced that the Province would not be pursuing Schedule 10 of the Bill, which were changes under the Planning Act.

3. Staff reviewed and provided comments back to the Province on the proposed changes to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

4. Finalizing the site plan drawings details with the County of Simcoe on the Oakwood Affordable Seniors Housing project at 60 Maple Street. It is anticipated that the site plan agreement will be finalized and registered by the end of March.

5. The County has submitted the building permit for the proposed development and it is anticipated that tree removal will begin as early as the week of March 11. 6. Finalizing the latest site plan submission for 5 Fallowfield Lane. Anticipated approval would be spring 2019.

______Planning and Development 1 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-12

7. Worked with the Director of Finance to finalize the new Development Charges Background Study and By-law. 8. Completed Summer Planner Interview. The Township has selected Amanda Hoffmann for the summer position. Amanda is an Urban and Regional Planning Student at the Ryerson University.

Meetings/Training

9. Attended Department Head Meetings 10. Joint Health and Safety Meetings/Inspections 11. Committee of Adjustment 12. Municipal Liaison Group Meeting 13. North Regional Roundtable on Proposed Changes to the Growth Plan 14. Presentation from the SSS Climate Change Action Plan

Prepared and Recommended By;

Steven Farquharson, B.URPL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development

______Planning and Development 2 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-12

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Planning and Development

Chair: Councillor Mary Warnock

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No.: PD-2019-13

Subject: Modification to Draft Plan Conditions for Heights of Victoria Harbour Draft Plan of Subdivision File Number TA-T-90017

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PD-2019-13 regarding a modification to the draft plan conditions of the Heights of Victoria Harbour subdivision File Number TA-T-90017 be received; That the revised conditions of draft plan approval for the Heights of Victoria Harbour Subdivision be amended as outlined in Attachment “B” of Staff Report PD-2019-13. And that the owners be notified of the decision of Council, with respect to the revised conditions.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

As part of the review of the request by the Owners to obtain an extension to the draft plan approval of the Heights of Victoria Harbour subdivision, the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development have completed a detailed review of the draft plan conditions for the subdivision. As part of this review it was determined that additional conditions should be added in order to ensure the site is developed in an efficient and responsible manner. The subdivision was given draft plan approval on August 16th, 1990, and as such the conditions would be fairly out of date. A copy of the plan is attached to this report for Council’s information. It was part of the extension request that allowed staff to review the existing draft plan

Planning and Development 1 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13 approval conditions, to determine if any changes needed to be done to bring the development up to current standards.

ANALYSIS:

It was determined through the review process that the draft plan conditions for the subdivision need to be updated in order to ensure they are consistent with the Township’s goals and objectives, and that they meet current standards such as Engineering and Transportation matters. The settlement area of Victoria Harbour has experienced significant growth since this draft plan received approval in 1990, and as such the draft plan conditions should be revised in order to ensure this development can occur in an appropriate manner.

The Planning Act allows through Section 51(44), the Approval Authority (being the Township) to change conditions prior to final approval of the plan of subdivision. Planning and Public Works staff have reviewed the existing draft plan conditions and are recommending to Council that the revised conditions listed as Attachment “B” form the new draft plan conditions for the proposed subdivision. The newly added conditions to the draft plan would include conditions #17 to 27, as well as renaming some of the Provincial Ministries and replacing Hydro One with Newmarket-Tay Hydro.

Township provided written correspondence to the Owners on December 3, 2018 with a summary of the proposed changes to the Conditions and provided further direction on December 19, 2018 that a Staff report would be proceeding to Council in January and February of 2019 with the recommended changes. On January 29, 2019, Township Staff met with the owners to discuss the proposed changes to the draft plan conditions. The owners at that time did not object to the conditions, but requested that staff hold off until March Committee to bring the report forward for Council consideration. The owners to date have not contacted staff again regarding the change to the draft plan conditions. Should Council approve the modified conditions and the owners disagree with them, there is an opportunity for them to appeal to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT:

Should the owners wish to appeal the revised conditions to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal, there may be associated fees with defending Council’s decision.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the revised conditions as shown on Attachment “B” of this staff report be approved and that the owner be notified of Council’s decision.

Planning and Development 2 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

Attachments:

Attachment 1- Revised Draft Plan Conditions

Prepared and Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Steven Farquharson, B.URPL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

Planning and Development 3 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

Attachment 1: Draft Plan of Subdivision

Planning and Development 4 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

Attachment “B” Revised Draft Plan Conditions

Applicant: 1493784 Ontario Ltd. File No.: TA-T-90017 Heights of Victoria Harbour Date of Original Approval: October 22, 1993 Date of Decision: January 14, 2004 Date of Revised Conditions: December 26, 2018 Municipality: Township of Tay Subject Lands: Lot 14, Concession 7

The Township of Tay conditions to final plan approval for registration of this plan of subdivision are as follows:

1. That this approval applies to the draft plan, prepared by Higgins Engineering Limited, Drawing No. 1238-205, dated February 22, 1990, which shows a total of 119 lots (Lots 1 to 119) to permit 119 single detached residential units, 7 Blocks (Blocks 120 to 125 and Block 128) for reserves, 1 Block (Block 126) reserved for future development, and 1 Block (Block 127) reserved for a park.

2. Draft approval shall lapse on December 31st, 2020. Request for extensions shall be made to the Township of Tay and shall be accompanied by the required fee, and a Report by the owner’s Consultants with respect to the continued conformity of the Draft Plan to the County Official Plan and the Township’s Official Plan and Zoning By-law and confirmation that the plan meets current good engineering design practices and engineering Best Management Practices.

3. That the draft plan be reviewed by the Township of Tay and alterations to the Plan be made to the Township’s satisfaction, prior to registration, in order that the design be improved.

4. That the road allowances included in this draft plan shall be dedicated as public highways.

5. That the street names shown on the draft plan be to the satisfaction of the Township of Tay.

6. That any dead ends or open sides of road allowance created by this draft plan shall be terminated in 0.3 metre reserves to be conveyed to, and held in trust, by the Township.

7. That Block 125, as shown on the draft plan, shall be shown and dedicated as a public walkway on the final plan.

Planning and Development 5 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

8. That the owner convey up to 5% of the land included in the plan to the Township for park or other public recreation purposes. This shall include Block 127, identified as a park site on the draft plan.

9. That the owner agrees in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Township of Tay concerning the provision of roads, installation of services and drainage.

10. That such easements as may be required for utility or drainage purposes shall be granted to the appropriate authority.

11. That the subdivision agreement between the owner and the Township of Tay be registered against the lands to which it applies once the plan of subdivision has been registered.

12. That prior to final approval, the owners submit to the Ministry of the Environment and the Severn Sound Environmental Association for review and approval an erosion control plan to detail how erosion and siltation and their effects will be minimized both during and following construction.

13. That prior to final approval, a copy of the fully executed subdivision agreement between the owner and the Township contain, in wording satisfactory to the Ministry of the Environment and the Severn Sound Environmental Association, a provision that the owner will carry out the recommendations of the approved erosion control plan mentioned in Condition 12 above.

14. That prior to final approval by the Township of Tay, we are to be advised in writing by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the Severn Sound Environmental Association how conditions 12 and 13 have been satisfied.

15. Draft approval does not guarantee an allocation of sewer or water capacity. Prior to the final approval and registration of the plan, the Township of Tay shall be satisfied that sufficient sewage treatment capacity and water capacity exists to service the development.

16. That draft plan approval does not guarantee population allocation and that prior to final approval and registration of the plan, the Township of Tay provide written approval that population capacity exists for the portion of the plan to be registered.

17. That the owner agrees to provide to the satisfaction of the Township, a Species At Risk evaluation for the development.

Planning and Development 6 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

18. That prior to approval of any Phase within the proposed plan, that the owner agrees to provide to the satisfaction of the Township and the Ministry of Transportation, a Traffic Impact Study to assess the site impacts to existing local road and Highway 12.

19. That the following be prepared and submitted to the satisfaction of the Township of Tay, the Severn Sound Environmental Association and Ministry of the Environment: a) A detailed Stormwater Management Plan/Report; b) An Erosion Control Plan detailing how erosion and siltation and their effects will be minimized both during and following construction; c) A detailed Grading Plan.

20. That the subdivision agreement contain provisions whereby the owner agrees that all the requirements of the subdivision agreement including installation of required services be completed within three (3) years after registration.

21. Prior to the submission of detailed engineering drawings, the owner shall submit to the Director of Public Works two (2) copies of a soils report prepared by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario. This report shall, as a minimum provide factual information on the soils and groundwater conditions with the proposed development. The reports shall include design information and recommended construction procedures for the following items: Storm sewers, sanitary sewers, watermains, roads, surface drainage works including erosion control and slope stability (if applicable).

22. The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan for all the proposed lots as part of the submission of detail construction drawings. This plan shall show finished grades around new houses, side yards, swales and lot corners. The plan shall show sufficient grades on boundary properties to blend the lot grading of the new site to existing properties.

23. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement in wording acceptable to the Township, to carry out or cause to be carried out the recommendations and measures contained within the reports, investigations and plans as outlined in the above conditions.

24. The Owner enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Township of Tay agreeing to satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Township of Tay concerning the provision of roads, walkways, sidewalks, street lighting, sanitary sewers, watermains, fire protection and access, storm sewers and drainage facilities.

Planning and Development 7 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

25. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to cause a qualified professional (acceptable to the Township) to certify in writing that the works were constructed in accordance with the plans, reports and specifications as approved.

26. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to satisfy Canada Post as to satisfactory arrangements for the installation of mail facility(s), if required, in the development.

27. That the Owner agrees in the Subdivision Agreement to provide to the Township of Tay and the County of Simcoe a digital copy of the Plan of Subdivision as approved for registration.

NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL

1. It is the applicant’s responsibility to fulfill the conditions of draft approval and to ensure that the required clearance letters are forwarded by the appropriate agencies to the Township of Tay, Planning Department, quoting the file number.

2. We suggest you make yourself aware of:

a) Section 143(1) of The Lands Title Act, which requires all new plans be registered in a land titles system;

b) Section 143(2) – allows certain exceptions.

3. Clearance letters are required from the following agencies:

Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Barrie District Office 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Barrie ON L4N 5R7

Severn Sound Environmental Association 489 Finlayson St PO Box 460 Port McNicoll ON L0K 1R0

If an agency condition concerns a matter within the subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to them. This will expedite clearance of the final plan. A copy of the agreement is not required by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs.

4. All measurements in subdivision and condominium final plans must be presented in metric units.

Planning and Development 8 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

5. The final plan approved by the Township of Tay must be registered within thirty (30) days or the Township may withdraw its approval under section 50(21) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1983.

6. The costs of any relocations or revisions to Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Limited facilities which are necessary to accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the owner.

7. Any easement rights of Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Limited are to be respected.

8. The Owner should contact the local Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Limited Area Office to verify if any low voltage distribution lines may be affected by the proposal.

9. All deeds to be conveyed must be free and clear of encumbrances.

10. The County of Simcoe has specific requirements for the submission of digital drawings. Contact the County Geographical Information Systems Division for additional information. Digital drawings should be submitted to the County Planning Division and to the Township of Tay.

11. If agency conditions concern conditions of the subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to them. This will expedite clearance of the final plan.

Subject to the conditions set forth above, this Draft Plan is approved under Section 50 of the Planning Act, 1983.

This 27th day of March, 2019.

______Steven Farquharson, B.URPL MCIP RPP Director of Planning and Development The Corporation of the Township of Tay

Planning and Development 9 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-13

STAFF REPORT

Department/Function: Planning and Development

Chair: Councillor Mary Warnock

Meeting Date: March 13th, 2019

Report No.: PD-2019-14

Subject: 2019 Housekeeping Amendment to Zoning By-law 2000-57

RECOMMENDATION: That Staff Report No. PD-2019-14 regarding Zoning By-law Amendment Housekeeping be received; And further that Council authorizes staff to begin the appropriate Planning process and schedule a public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:

Every other year or so, the Planning Department undertakes a housekeeping amendment to our Zoning By-law. Due to the timing of the new Zoning By- law potentially not coming forward for Council consideration until 2020 to 2021, Planning staff determined that it would be appropriate to proceed with a housekeeping zoning amendment. We keep notes of errors and omissions from the Zoning By-law or keep track of other possible changes to the By- law that would be beneficial to the implementation of planning in the municipality. Often the changes are intended to make the Zoning By-law more clear and concise.

______Planning and Development 1 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

The proposed amendments outlined in detail in Attachment 1 are intended to address inconsistencies, barriers for implementation, errors and omissions that have been apparent through the day to day use of the by-law by staff. ANALYSIS:

Staff is proposing to modify the provisions for accessory building and structures, increase flexibility for home occupations and home industries, storing of special vehicles, add additional definitions such as Marihuana Production Facilities and Pre-Fabricated Shipping Container, Utility Trailers. Staff have are also proposing for some additional opportunities that would allow for Pre-Fabricated Shipping Containers on a temporary basis in residential zones.

Staff are not proposing any mapping changes at this time, as this would occur with the development of the new Zoning By-law.

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACT:

There will be some associated cost with advertising the Notice of Public Meeting in the local newspaper.

CONCLUSION:

The proposed changes to Zoning By-law 2000-57 will better clarify the existing planning policies and provide more flexibility without compromising the overall intent of the Zoning By-law.

It is the recommendations of Planning staff that a public meeting be scheduled to gather public input on the proposed changes to the Zoning By- law.

Attachments:

Attachment 1- Zoning By-law 2000-57 (Proposed Housekeeping 2019)

______Planning and Development 2 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Prepared and Recommended By: Date: March 6, 2019

Steven Farquharson, B.URPL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development

Reviewed By: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

______Planning and Development 3 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

ATTACHEMENT 1

ZONING BY-LAW 2000-57 HOUSEKEEPING 2019 UPDATES

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 1. 3.0 Marihuana Considered to fall ADD with: By adding this definition it provides Production under the a clear definition on where Facility Processing Use Marihuana/Cannabis Marihuana/Cannabis Production definition. Production Facility facilities can locate. They would remain only permitted within the means a wholly enclosed Industrial zoned properties within building, structure or part the Township. thereof, used to possess, This definition would include both produce, sell, provide, ship, recreational and medical production deliver, transport or destroy facilities. These uses would remain marihuana or cannabis by a as a permitted use within the Licensed Producer authorized Industrial zones of the By-law. by Health Canada according to the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations SOR/2013-119 and any successor thereto. 2. 3.0 Pre- Is not presently Add with: This product is being requested Fabricated defined in the more and more in the Township Shipping Zoning by-law Pre-Fabricated Shipping and at the presently time we do not Container Container define them. It was staff opinion Means a pre-fabricated metal that we should clearly define it in container that is the Zoning By-law and have conventionally used for the applicable provisions in Section 4.0 purpose of shipping goods, General Provisions of the Zoning but does not include a truck By-law to regulate them body, trailer or transport trailer, and does not have wheels and cannot be capable of human habitation. 3. 3.0 Utility Replace the term ADD with: Trailer Trailer with Utility Utility Trailer Trailer is presently not defined in Trailer means a non- the Zoning By-law, but deleting and motorized vehicle which is replacing it with Utility Trailer it generally pulled by a provides clear definition of utility motorized vehicle and trailers. features an open-top rear cargo area (bed) and is used for the hauling of light loads, or boats, off road recreational vehicles and other recreational equipment and includes a boat trailer, an off road recreational trailer and a snowmobile trailer

______Planning and Development 4 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 4. 4.1.4 General Does not provide Add with: This would prohibit shipping Provisions clear direction on Section 4.1.4 (d) containers to be in residential (Accessory, Pre-Fabricated Pre-Fabricated Shipping zones. Buildings, Uses Shipping Containers shall not be Staff recognizes that there are and Structures Containers permitted unless otherwise situations where shipping specified in this By-law. containers are required such as a flood in the dwelling. Therefore there are proposed policies that would address these circumstances. 5. New Section to New Policy ADD TEXT: This provision provides the Section 4 Section 4.32 flexibility for pre-fabricated shipping Notwithstanding any other containers to be located temporary provision in this By-law, the in residential zones, while moving temporary placement of one or having to temporarily store items pre-fabricated shipping during a renovation to the dwelling.. container is permitted per lot These provisions do not apply to in a Residential Zone non-residential zones. provided the pre-fabricated shipping container: (a) Is located on the driveway; (b) Is set back a minimum of 1.0 metre from any lot line; (c) not be located in a daylight corner, (d) Has a maximum height of 2.5 metres, a maximum width of 2.5 metres and a maximum length of 6.0 metres; (e) Not encroach onto a public sidewalk or municipal right-of-way (f) Is not located on the lot for more than 30 days in a calendar year. (g) Shall not be used for human habitation.

6. 4.1.5 Lot Decks are Add Text: Staff has had many issues Coverage considered to be Decks which are attached or particularly for properties along part of the directly abutting a dwelling Georgian Bay, that the lots are accessory shall be considered part of having difficulty placing a deck on building/Structure the lot coverage for the main the dwelling, while having a lot coverage of building. detached garage and boathouse. 10%.

______Planning and Development 5 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 7. 4.1.6 Maximum Maximum ground AMEND Text: The reason for the reduction is that Ground Floor floor area of an The maximum ground floor accessory structures of 93 m2 are in Area Accessory area of any one detached most situations larger than the main Structure is 93m2 accessory building or structure (dwelling) on the property. (1000 sq. ft). structure, excluding boathouses, is 75 m2. The proposed size of 75m2 would New provision to However, on lots in the still allow for a double car garage to regulate floor Agricultural and Rural Zones, be built, which would maintain the area of accessory the maximum ground floor character of the area and allow fir structures in area of any one detached the accessory building to remain Agricultural and accessory building or secondary to the principle use. Rural Zones. structure is 100 m2. This provision shall not apply to The proposed provision for the accessory buildings or agricultural and rural zones does structures in the C1, C2, C3, not apply to agricultural buildings C4, C5, C6, MAR, M1or M2 and structures. Zones. 8. 4.1.9(c) Minimum required AMEND Text: This revision would help ensure Setbacks interior and rear The minimum required that there is sufficient distance to lot lines is 1.0 interior and rear yard setback the lot line to ensure lot grading can metres shall be 2.0metres occur and there is enough distance that maintenance on the structure can occur without trespassing one the neighbouring lot. 9. 4.1.9 New 1.0 metres for ADD text: This policy change would allow for Provision through lots The minimum required an accessory building/structure to setback for an accessory be setback an appropriate distance building/structure for a from the front and rear lot lines through lot shall be the same abutting a street. as the main building on the lot. 10. New Provision New Provision ADD Text: Accessory structures are being to Section 4.0 Accessory Buildings shall be joined together with a common wall set back a minimum distance or are being build of 1.0 metre from the main building on the lot and be set back a minimum distance of 1.0 metres from any detached accessory building on the same lot.

______Planning and Development 6 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 11. New Provision The existing By- ADD Text: Many residents have small garden to law has it subject Detached accessory building sheds, and when they want to build Section 4.0 to all the or structures which are less a detached accessory structure provisions of than 10 square metres in they are not permitted to do so as Section 4.1. This ground floor area shall: the garden sheds are considered will be a new (a) not be located in the structures. By having the proposed Provision in the required front yard or required provisions in place it allows for the By-law to address exterior side yard of the flexibility. By linking it back to the accessory principal use of the property; general lot coverage provisions for buildings and (b) shall not be located in the accessory buildings it would ensure structures less front yard in all residential that the lot is not over developed. 2 than 10 m . zones; (b) shall be setback a minimum of 1.0 metres from the rear lot line (c) shall be setback a minimum of 1.0 metres from interior side lot lines (e) shall meet the exterior setback of the main building of the zone (e) shall have a maximum height of 2.5 metres (f) Shall be limited to 2 detached accessory structures/buildings with a size of less than 10 square metres (g) Shall be subject to the lot coverage provisions of Section 4.1.5. 12. 4.20 Permitted Existing By-law ADD Text: This provides the flexibility for Yard allows for Add 0.5 metres into a decks to be located closer to the Encroachments encroachment required one interior side yard side lot lines on one side provided into front and and exterior side yard the required setback is being rear, but not side setback. maintained on the other interior yards. side yard setback.

______Planning and Development 7 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 13. New Provision ADD Text: The existing Zoning By-law is silent to on breezeways and this provide Section 4.0 Where a breezeway connects clear interpretation on a policy that a private garage to the main allows for detached garages to be building on the lot, forming added to the main buildings, for part of the main building, the zone regulation purposes. This following criteria must be met: would allow for development of breezeways to ensure that they complement the principle use and a. The breezeway is ensure that they do not visually structurally connected to both look like two separate buildings. buildings; b. The breezeway is a roofed structure with no less than 60% of the total perimeter of the breezeway enclosed by walls, doors or windows; c. The breezeway is at least 1.8 metres in width to a maximum of 2.5 metres in width, and no more than 9 metres in length.

14. 4.1.9 (b) Restricts AMEND text: a maximum of Staff have been getting request for Setbacks detached one (1) detached Accessory accessory buildings on the front accessory building may be permitted to yard for lots besides waterfront lots. buildings in the be located in the front yard, This would provide the flexibility for front yard, unless but not in the required front accessory dwellings to be located on the water lot or yard setback of the main in the front yard but not within the zoned building. front yard setback. agricultural/rural 15. 4.1.9(g) Requires a 6.0 DELETE Text: Provisions in the By-law would Setbacks metre setback for allow for accessory waterfront lots buildings/structures in the front yard for all zones, provided they meet the front yard setback of the main building.

______Planning and Development 8 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 16. 4.8 Home 4.8.1 In the "RU" and AMEND Text: The proposed provisions Occupation "A" Zones a home A home industry or home occupation will allow for more home and Home industry or a home shall be located entirely within a occupations and home Industries occupation is detached accessory building and/or industries to operate in permitted in an the main building on the lot. the Township: accessory building or -allowing for an increase structure, providing a) Shall clearly be secondary from 25% to 35% of the the gross use of the lot; GFA of a dwelling to be floor area does not b) The residential appearance used for the home exceed 75 square and character of the dwelling shall occupation. metres. be maintained. - increased how much 4.8.2 The profession, c) A maximum of one (1) home floor area of an occupation or trade occupation shall be permitted per accessory building can shall be carried on by dwelling unit. be used for a home a landowner d) A home industry or home occupation from 75 or tenant residing on occupation shall only occupy a square metres in the the premises. maximum of 35% of the gross floor A/RU zone to 100%. 4.8.3 Not more than area of the dwelling unit. Presently the Zoning By- one (1) assistant who e) shall not occupy more than law does not allow for is not a resident in 50 percent of the gross floor area of accessory buildings in said dwelling a detached accessory building in a residential zones to be may operate the Residential Zone and 100 percent used for home home occupation or of a detached accessory building in occupations. Staff is industry. the Agricultural Zone proposing that a 4.8.4 Not more than f) A home industry or home maximum of 50% of a twenty-five (25) occupation shall be operated by the detached accessory percent of the total person or persons whose principal building be permitted to floor area of a residence is the dwelling in which be used for the home dwelling unit may be the home occupation is located, and occupation. devoted to a home a maximum of two persons who - Current provision occupation. does not reside in the dwelling as a restricts only one person 4.8.5 Any plate or principal residence shall be who is a non-resident to sign shall be attached employed by the home occupation, be employed as part of and parallel to the in addition to the residents of the the home occupation, main wall of the dwelling. staff are proposing to dwelling unit or g) A sign is permitted to be increase this to two. accessory building displayed on the lot for the home and no flashing or industry or home occupation, animated sign provided: shall be used. - A maximum of one (1) sign is The use shall not permitted on a lot for each create or become a permitted home industry or nuisance because of home occupation; and, noise, - The sign shall comply with the fumes, dust, odour, Township’s Sign By-law. traffic or otherwise interfere with the j) The use shall not create or enjoyment of become a nuisance because of the amenities of the noise, fumes, dust, odour, traffic or adjacent otherwise interfere with the neighbourhood or enjoyment of the amenities of the lands. adjacent neighbourhood or lands. 4.8.7 There shall be k) There shall be no outside storage no outside storage or or display of materials, containers, display of materials, finished products or mechanical containers, equipment. finished products or l) The use shall only be permitted mechanical where the existing lot abuts upon and equipment. has frontage on an improved public street assumed for public use. ______Planning and Development 9 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 17. 4.8.8 The use shall m) The use shall not only be permitted involve retailing or the sale where the existing of any commodity not lot abuts upon and produced on the premises. has frontage on an n) The use shall not improved public require the receipt or street assumed for delivery of merchandise, public use. goods or equipment by 4.8.9 The use shall any other than a not involve passenger motor vehicle retailing or the sale or parcel carrier employed of any commodity in residential deliveries. not produced on the premises. 4.8.10 The use shall not require the receipt or delivery of merchandise, goods or equipment by any other than a passenger motor vehicle or parcel carrier employed in residential deliveries.

18. 4.12 (a) AMEND Text: This will ensure that additions Legal Non- The extension, The extension, to existing legal non- Complying enlargement, enlargement, conforming building and Buildings and reconstruction, reconstruction, relocation, structures new structures that Structures. relocation, replacement, repair or are being built, would comply replacement, repair renovation does not with the provisions of the By- or renovation does increase the usable floor law. This is particular important not further reduce area in a required yard, for small lots such as those on such further reduce such Robin’s Point Road that are setback and/or setback and/or front yard transitioning from seasonal front yard and/or and/or side yard and/or dwellings to year round. side yard and/or rear yard rear yard having less than the having less than minimum required by this the minimum By-law; and required by this By- law; and

19. 4.29 Storing of Trailer Replace all reference of Make the use more clear and Special Trailer with Utility Trailer concise Vehicles

______Planning and Development 10 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 20. 4.29.3 In a Residential AMEND Text: By removing the term Trailer Storing of Zone, the parking 4.29.3 In a Residential and replacing it with Utility Special or outside storage Zone, the parking or Trailer it provides a clear Vehicles of a camper outside storage of a identified of what is allowed on trailer, a motor camper trailer, a motor the property. home, a trailer, a home, travel trailer utility Presently camper trailer, a boat or boat trailer trailer, a boat is permitted motor home, trailer, a boat or is permitted only only where such use: boat trailer are not permitted where such use: i) is accessory to an within the front yard. This is i) is accessory to existing residential use; proposing is to provide more an existing ii) is located in the rear or flexibility for residents who own residential use; interior side yard and no these types of special vehicles. ii) is located in the closer than 1.0 metres to We have eliminated reference rear or interior side the lot lines; to boat trailer and it is captured yard and no closer iii) is limited to a maximum under the than 1.0 of one each of either a metres to the lot camper trailer, a motor lines; home, travel trailer, utility iii) is limited to a trailer, or a boat. maximum of one iv) Such camper trailer, each of either a motor home, travel trailer, camper trailer, a utility trailer, boat shall not motor home, a exceed 7 metres in length trailer, or a boat over all exclusive of the and/or boat trailer, hitch or tongue and 3.5 iv) such camper metres in width trailer, motor home, v) shall be permitted on a trailer, boat and/or driveway in the front yard, boat trailer, and and shall have a 0.5 metre v) Shall not exceed setback from the front lot 7 metres in length line over all exclusive of the hitch or tongue and 3.5 metres in width.

______Planning and Development 11 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

Section Existing - By-law Action Comment 2000-57 21. 4.29.8 Notwithstanding AMEND Text: The proposed policy would the preceding 4.29.3 Notwithstanding the only apply to those lands subsections, the preceding subsections, the zoned Residential as parking or storage parking or storage of a Agricultural and Rural lots of a trailer, camper travel trailer, camper trailer, would typically have larger lots trailer, motor home, motor home may be and provide an opportunity to boat or boat trailer permitted in a Residential store these uses year round. may be permitted Zone from 1 April to 31 The current policy allows for in a Residential, October of each calendar year round storage but only for Rural or year in a driveway. a maximum of 5 days in any Agricultural Zone one month. This proposes for a maximum A utility trailer not more some constraints as residents period of 5 days in than 5.5m in length typically uses these items in any one calendar inclusive of projections and the summer months and store month in a front attachments is permitted to them off site in the winter yard or exterior park in a driveway year months. This adjustment to not side yard, provided round, and shall be setback cap the number of days in a that such lot is not 0.5 metres from the front lot calendar month to unlimited used for an line. from April 1 to October 31 apartment building provides a more realistic and purposes. common sense approach when addressing these items. As utility trailers could have multiple uses it is proposed by staff that it can be store in the driveway year round. 22. Section 22.2 Not listed as a ADD text: Properly recognize the use in General permitted use in Marihuana Production the Zoning By-law Industrial: Uses the Zoning By-law Facility Permitted 23. Section 23.2 Not listed as a ADD text: Properly recognize the use in Prestige permitted use in Marihuana Production the Zoning By-law Industrial: Uses the Zoning By-law Facility Permitted

______Planning and Development 12 March 13, 2019 PD-2019-14

STAFF REPORT ______

Department/Function: Planning and Development Committee

Chair: Councillor Warnock

Meeting Date: March 13, 2019

Report No: PD-2019-11

Subject: Building Services Division Update - February 2019 ______

RECOMMENDATION: That Report No. PD-2019-11 regarding Building Services Division Update February 2019 be received.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The following is an overview of the activities of the Building Services Division for the February 2019 calendar month.

PERMITS FEBRUARY FEBRUARY 2018 2019 Number of Permits Issued this Month 9 10 Number of Permits Issued to Date 9 28 New Dwelling Units 1 2 Total New Dwelling Units to Date 1 2 Accessory Buildings(garages,sheds,gazebos etc.) 1 1 Additions 1 Decks 1 Demolition 0 1 Water line services/Plumbing 0 1 Farm Buildings 0 Renovations 2 3 Solid Fuel-Fired Appliances 2 Swimming Pool / Fence Permits 0 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional 0 Transfer 0 Temporary Structures 0

______Planning and Development Committee 1 March 13, 2019 Report No: PD-2019-11

Other Government New 0 0

Residential Solar Panel/Mechanical 0 Change of Use 0 1 Septic System 0 1 Inspections and Orders Inspections Conducted 102 138 Site Inspections/Consultations Conducted without a Permit 81 22 Inspections Conducted to Date 183 296 Orders to Comply Issued 1 1 Stop Work Orders Issued 0 0 Orders to Remedy Unsafe Building Issued/Prohibited Use 3 0 Orders to Uncover 0 0 Permits Closed 13 63 Total Permits Closed to Date 13 92 Total Permits Outstanding 666 761 Fees and Construction Value Permit Fees $5,841.31 $6,518.72 Total Permit Fees to Date $5,841.31 $10,099.91 Construction Value $513,000.00 $1,127,000.00 Total Construction Value to Date $513,000.00 $1,362,200.00

Prepared by: Terry Tompkins, CBCO, CRBO, CPSO Chief Building Official

Recommended by: Date: March 6, 2019

Steven Farquharson, B.URPL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development

Reviewed by: Date: March 6, 2019

Robert J. Lamb, CEcD, Ec.D. Chief Administrative Officer

______Planning and Development Committee 2 March 13, 2019 Report No: PD-2019-11

2019 Simcoe County Age-Friendly Seniors Housing Grant Program Accessible, Adaptable and Inclusive Designs for Occupants 60+ The County of Simcoe has established an annual fund in the amount of $500,000 for eligible Seniors Housing Grant Program projects. Grant amounts will be distributed based on the number of applications received and ability to meet funding criteria.

Applicants eligible for this grant include those completing renovations or new housing projects located within the 16 local municipalities of the County of Simcoe (excludes cities of Barrie and Orillia). Applicants can be homeowners or developers wanting to develop age- friendly seniors housing. To see if you are eligible to apply, visit us online at: www.simcoe.ca/age-friendly or call 705 726-9300 ext. 1405 Deadline for grant submissions is May 15, 2019

AF seniors housing grant 2019.indd 1 1/29/2019 10:47:40 AM