DINAMICA ESPACIO TEMPORAL DEL ENSAMBLE AVIAL DEL HUMEDAL DE LA DESEMBOCADURA DEL RÍO HUASCO III Región (28° 27’S – 71°12’O) DURANTE EL PERIODO 2004 - 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DINAMICA ESPACIO TEMPORAL DEL ENSAMBLE AVIAL DEL HUMEDAL DE LA DESEMBOCADURA DEL RÍO HUASCO III Región (28° 27’S – 71°12’O) DURANTE EL PERIODO 2004 - 2005 UNIVERSIDAD ARTURO PRAT DEPARTAMENTO CIENCIAS DEL MAR IQUIQUE - CHILE Informe final de tesis para optar al titulo de Biólogo Marino DINAMICA ESPACIO TEMPORAL DEL ENSAMBLE AVIAL DEL HUMEDAL DE LA DESEMBOCADURA DEL RÍO HUASCO III Región (28° 27’S – 71°12’O) DURANTE EL PERIODO 2004 - 2005 Alumno: Flavio Olivares Zuleta Profesor guía: Walter Sielfeld Kowald 13 Índice DEDICATORIA AGRADECIMIENTOS RESUMEN ……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………. 3 1. INTRODUCCION................................................................................................. 5 2. PROBLEMÁTICA.……………………………………………………………………. 11 3. HIPOTESIS..…………………………………………………………………………... 12 4. OBJETIVOS…………………………………………………………………………… 13 4.1 Objetivo general 4.2 Objetivos específicos 5. ANTECEDENTES DE LA DESEMBOCADURA DEL RIO HUASCO 5.1 Ubicación……………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 5.2 Geología………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 5.3 Geomorfología……………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 5.4 Hidrología…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 5.5 Flora y vegetación terrestre………………………………………………………………………… 15 5.6 Clima………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 6. Metodología 6.1 Área de estudio………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 6.2 Identificación de especies………………………………………………………………….............. 20 6.3 Periodo de estudio…………………………………………………………………………………… 20 6.4 Taxocenosis…………………………………………………………………………………............. 21 6.5 Dominancia y Constancia………………………………………………………………….............. 21 6.6 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………… 21 6.7 Estados de conservación………………………………………………………………………….... 22 6.8 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 6.9 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………… 22 14 6.10 Riqueza de especies de Margalef………………………………………………………………… 23 6.11 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………………. 23 6.12 Método de acuchillamiento de datos de Jacknife………………………………………………. 24 6.13 Análisis Temporal de la abundancia……………………………………………………………… 24 7. RESULTADOS 7.1 Análisis de la Estructura comunitaria Taxocenosis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 Dominancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………... 27 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………... 27 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………... 28 Riqueza de especies de Margalef…………………………………………………………………. 28 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………….. 29 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 30 7.2 Análisis estacional de la estructura comunitaria Taxocenosis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 Dominancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 Número de especies……………………………………………………………………………….. 35 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 35 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 36 7.3 Análisis espacial de los sectores del humedal de la DRH 7.3.1 Sector 1 Playa Taxocenosis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 37 Dominancia ………………………………………………………………………………………… 37 Numero de especies………………………………………………………………………………. 38 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 38 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………. 39 Riqueza de especies de Margalef……………………………………………………………….. 39 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………………. 40 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………............ 40 Análisis Biocenótico……………………………………………………………………………….. 41 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 41 15 7.3.2 Sector 2 Dunas Norte Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42 Dominancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 43 Numero de especies……………………………………………………………………………….. 43 Abundancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………... 45 Riqueza de especies de Margalef…………………………………………………………………. 45 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………….. 45 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 46 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 46 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 47 7.3.3 Sector 3 Laguna Grande Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………….. 48 Dominancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………... 49 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 50 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………... 50 Riqueza de especies de Margalef…………………………………………………………………. 51 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………............. 51 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 52 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 53 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 53 7.3.4 Sector 4 Dunas Sur Taxocenosis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 54 Dominancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 55 Numero de especies……………………………………………………………………………….. 55 Abundancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………... 57 Riqueza de especies de Margalef…………………………………………………………………. 57 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………............. 57 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 58 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 58 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 59 16 7.3.5 Sector 5 Laguna Chica Taxocenosis……………………………………………………………………………...………… 60 Dominancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 60 Numero de especies………………………………………………………………………………... 61 Abundancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 61 Frecuencia de avistamiento……………………………………………………………………….. 62 Riqueza de especies de Margalef………………………………………………………………… 62 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………............. 63 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 63 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 64 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 65 7.4 Análisis estacional de los sectores de la DRH 7.4.1 Sector 1 Playa Taxocenosis……………………………………………………………………………………….. 66 Dominancia ………………………………………………………………………………………… 66 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………. 67 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 67 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 69 7.4.2 Sector 2 Dunas Sur Taxocenosis……………………………………………………………………………………….. 69 Dominancia. ………………………………………………………………………………............. 70 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………. 71 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 71 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 72 7.4.3 Sector 3 Laguna Grande Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………… 73 Dominancia ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 73 Número de especies……………………………………………………………………………… 74 Abundancia………………………………………………………………………………………… 75 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 75 7.4.4 Sector 4 Dunas Sur Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………... 76 Dominancia ………………………………………………………………………………………… 76 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………. 77 17 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 78 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 78 7.4.5 Sector 5 Laguna Chica Taxocenosis……………………………………………………………………………………….. 79 Dominancia ………………………………………………………………………………………… 79 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………. 81 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………………. 81 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener…………………………………………………………………… 82 8. DISCUSIÓN 8.1 Análisis de la Estructura comunitaria Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………... 83 Dominancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 87 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………... 88 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 89 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………... 90 Riqueza de especies de Margalef…………………………………………………………………. 91 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………............. 91 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………… 92 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………… 93 Análisis Taxocenotico………………………………………………………………………………. 93 8.2 Análisis estacional de la estructura comunitaria Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………… 94 Dominancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 93 Número de especies………………………………………………………………………………... 95 Abundancia…………………………………………………………………………………............. 95 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………............. 96 8.3 Análisis espacial del humedal de la DRH 8.3.1 Sector 1 Playa Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………... 96 Dominancia………………………………………………………………………………………….. 97 Abundancias……….……………………………………………………………………………….. 97 Número de Especies...…………………………………………………………………………….. 98 Frecuencia de avistamiento……………………………………………………………………….. 98 Riqueza de especies de Margalef………………………………………………………………… 99 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………………..99 18 Nidificación………………………………………………………………………………………….. 100 Análisis Biocenótico………………………………………………………………………………... 100 Análisis Taxocenotico……………………………………………………………………………… 100 8.3.2 Sector 2 Dunas Norte Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………….101 Dominancia…………………………………………………………………………………………..101 Número de especies……………………………………………………………………………….. 102 Abundancia………... ………………………………………………………………………………. 102 Frecuencia de avistamiento………………………………………………………………………. 102 Riqueza de especies de Margalef………………………………………………………………… 103 Diversidad de Shanon-Wiener……………………………………………………………………. 103 Nidificación…………………………………………………………………………………………. 104 Análisis Biocenótico……………………………………………………………………................. 105 Análisis Taxocenotico……………………………………………………………………………… 105 8.3.3 Sector 3 Laguna Grande Taxocenosis………………………………………………………………………………………...
Recommended publications
  • Amphibia, Anura, Leiuperidae, Pleurodema Thaul (Lesson, 1827)
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2010 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Pleurodema thaul istribuitio Amphibia, Anura, Leiuperidae, D (Lesson, 1827): Altitudinal distribution extension and raphic G new records from 1 its northern 2 range 1,3 4 eo Claudio Correa Quezada *, Edvin Riveros , Gabriel Lobos and Nelson Velásquez G 1 Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Laboratorio de Genética y Evolución. Casilla Postal 653, oN Santiago, Chile. 2 Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales Renovables. Casilla 1004. otes Santiago, Chile. N 3 Universidad de Chile, Facultad [email protected] Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Centro de Estudios de Vida Silvestre. Casilla 2, Correo 15. Santiago, Chile. 4 Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Laboratorio de Neuroetología, Programa de Fisiología y Biofísica, ICBM. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: Pleurodema thaul The current study reports five new localities of the four-eyed frog (Lesson, 1827) in the extreme north of its distribution (27° to 30° S) in the desertic and semidesertic ravines of Chile, including an increase in its altitudinal range up to 3125 m. Pleurodema thaul The four-eyed frog (Lesson, 1827) is one Mediterranean bioclimate to a hyperoceanic temperate of the most abundant and widely distributed amphibians of one (Luebert and Pliscoffet al2006). Consequently, the Chile (Ceiet al.1962), extending from Carrera Pinto (27°06’ S) species inhabits both isolated oasis in the northern desert to the Aysén region (about 46°S; Veloso and Navarro 1988; (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Diaguitas Chilenos
    DIAGUITAS CHILENOS SERIE INTRODUCCIÓN HISTÓRICA Y RELATOS DE LOS PUEBLOS ORIGINARIOS DE CHILE HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND TALES OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF CHILE DIAGUITAS CHILENOS |3 DIAGUITAS CHILENOS SERIE INTRODUCCIÓN HISTÓRICA Y RELATOS DE LOS PUEBLOS ORIGINARIOS DE CHILE HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND TALES OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF CHILE 4| Esta obra es un proyecto de la Fundación de Comunicaciones, Capacitación y Cultura del Agro, Fucoa, y cuenta con el aporte del Fondo Nacional para el Desarrollo de la Cultura y las Artes, Fondart, Línea Bicentenario Redacción, edición de textos y coordinación de contenido: Christine Gleisner, Sara Montt (Unidad de Cultura, Fucoa) Revisión de contenidos: Francisco Contardo Diseño: Caroline Carmona, Victoria Neriz, Silvia Suárez (Unidad de Diseño, Fucoa), Rodrigo Rojas Revisión y selección de relatos en archivos y bibliotecas: María Jesús Martínez-Conde Transcripción de entrevistas: Macarena Solari Traducción al inglés: Focus English Fotografía de Portada: Arrieros camino a la cordillera, Sara Mont Inscripción Registro de Propiedad Intelectual N° 239.029 ISBN: 978-956-7215-52-2 Marzo 2014, Santiago de Chile Imprenta Ograma DIAGUITAS CHILENOS |5 agradeciMientos Quisiéramos expresar nuestra más sincera gratitud al Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes, por haber financiado la investigación y publicación de este libro. Asimismo, damos las gracias a las personas que colaboraron en la realización del presente texto, en especial a: Ernesto Alcayaga, Emeteria Ardiles, Maximino Ardiles, Olinda Campillay,
    [Show full text]
  • The Memorandum of Understanding Between Barrick Gold and Diaguita Communities of Chile
    1 A Problematic Process: The Memorandum of Understanding between Barrick Gold and Diaguita Communities of Chile By Dr. Adrienne Wiebe, September 2015 For MiningWatch Canada and Observatorio Latinoamericano de Conflictos Ambientales (OLCA) “Canadians need to be aware of what Barrick is doing. The company is trying to make money at any cost, at the price of the environment and the life of communities. Canadians should not just believe what Barrick says. They should listen to what other voices, those from the local community, have to say.” – Raúl Garrote, Municipal Councillor, Alto del Carmen, Chile Introduction In May, 2014, Canadian mining company Barrick Gold announced that it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with 15 Diaguita communities in the area around the controversial Pascua Lama mine.i According to the company, the stated objective of the MOU between Diaguita Comunities and Associations with Barrick’s subsidiary Compañia Minera Nevada Spa in relation to Pascua Lama is to eXchange technical and environmental information about the project for which Barrick commited to provide financial and material resources to support its analysis. Barrick claimed that the MOU set a precedent in the world of international mining for community responsiveness and transparency. According to company officials, the agreements met and even exceeded the requirements of International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169 and set a new standard for mining companies around the world in their relationships with local Indigenous communities.ii While this announcement sounded positive, the situation is much more compleX and problematic than that presented publically by Barrick Gold. The MOU raises questions regarding: 1) Indigenous identity, rights, and representation; 2) development and signing of the MOU, and 3) strategies used by mining companies to gain the so-called social licence from local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Ambiental De La Gestión Y Uso Del Agua En La Cuenca Del Río Huasco
    UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE Facultad De Arquitectura Y Urbanismo Escuela De Pregrado Carrera de Geografía ANÁLISIS AMBIENTAL DE LA GESTIÓN Y USO DEL AGUA EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO HUASCO Memoria para optar al título profesional de Geógrafo Marcelo Valenzuela Fuentes Profesor Guía: Dr. Fernando Pino Santiago, Chile 2018 ANÁLISIS AMBIENTAL DE LA GESTIÓN Y USO DEL AGUA EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO HUASCO TABLA DE CONTENIDOS 1 Presentación ................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introducción ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Planteamiento del Problema ....................................................................................... 5 1.3 Localización ............................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 División Político-Administrativa .............................................................................. 10 1.3.2 Características Generales del Área de Estudio...................................................... 11 1.4 Objetivos .................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Objetivo General .................................................................................................... 15 1.4.2 Objetivos Específicos ............................................................................................ 15 2 Marco Teórico...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Water Resource Management and Energy Requirements for Water Supply in the Copiapó River Basin, Chile
    Water 2014, 6, 2590-2613; doi:10.3390/w6092590 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Integrated Water Resource Management and Energy Requirements for Water Supply in the Copiapó River Basin, Chile Francisco Suárez 1,2, José F. Muñoz 1, Bonifacio Fernández 1, Jean-Marc Dorsaz 1, Christian K. Hunter 1,2,3, Christos A. Karavitis 4 and Jorge Gironás 1,2,5,* 1 Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile; E-Mails: [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (J.F.M.); [email protected] (B.F.); [email protected] (J.-M.D.); [email protected] (C.K.H.) 2 Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable CONICYT/FONDAP/15110020, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile 3 Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556, USA 4 Department of Natural Resources Management & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 118 55, Greece; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Centro Interdisciplinario de Cambio Global, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-2-2354-4227; Fax: +56-2-2354-5876. Received: 26 May 2014; in revised form: 30 July 2014 / Accepted: 11 August 2014 / Published: 27 August 2014 Abstract: Population and industry growth in dry climates are fully tied to significant increase in water and energy demands. Because water affects many economic, social and environmental aspects, an interdisciplinary approach is needed to solve current and future water scarcity problems, and to minimize energy requirements in water production.
    [Show full text]
  • Chile: Travesías Culturales
    turismo cultural TRAVESÍAS CULTURALES Cultural Journeys TRaVESíaS CULTURaLES Cultural Journeys CHILE: TRAVESÍAS CULTURALES Chile: Cultural Journeys Publicación a cargo de Isidora Cabezón Papic (CNCA) Dirección editorial: Magdalena Aninat Sahli (CNCA) Edición general y corrección de estilo: Lucas Lecaros Calabacero (CNCA) Coordinación: Marcelo Varela Zúñiga (CNCA) Autores de los textos: Daniel Rojas, Lautaro Núñez, Raúl Mavrakis, Rodrigo Zalaquett, Gonzalo Ampuero, Sergio Paz, Michæ l Jones, Julio Hotus, Ramón Galaz, Pedro Gandolfo, Arnoldo Weber, Manuel Gedda, Bruno Bettati, Renato Cárdenas, Guillermo Rauld, Bárbara Saavedra, Paola Etchegaray, Alfredo Prieto Traducción y edición al inglés: Margaret Snook Dirección de Arte: Ignacio Poblete Castro (CNCA) Diseño y diagramación: Juan Carlos Berthelon Apoyo en diagramación: Valentina Silva Irarrázabal y María Francisca Maldonado Torres (CNCA) Fotografías: Universidad Austral, Claudia Campos, Corporación Cultural Teatro del Lago (Pedro Valenzuela), Alexis Díaz, Claudio Garrido, Javier Godoy, Tania Hernández, I. Municipalidad de Hualpén, MAC Valdivia, Jorge Marín, Francisco Manríquez, Fernando Meléndez, Sebastián Moreno, Milena Mollo, Muestra de Cine en la Patagonia, Gabriel Pérez (Ocho Libros), Nicolás Piwonka (Ocho Libros), Francisco Pereda (Ocho Libros), Claudio Pérez, Riolab, Lucía Rodríguez, Víctor Rojas, Paula Rossetti, Diario el Tipógrafo, Javier Tobar, Ariel Velásquez, Juan Pablo Zurita Retoque / Corrección de color: Eliana Arévalo / Paola Cifuentes En tapas, imágenes de Jorge Marín (máscara de La Tirana y ruka mapuche en lago Budi), Alexis Díaz (Salitrera de Santa Laura), Nicolás Piwonka (minga de tiradora en Chiloé) y Víctor Rojas (Ahu Tongariki) © Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes Registro de Propiedad Intelectual n0 215.574 ISBN: 978-956-8327-013-2 www.cultura.gob.cl Se autoriza la reproducción parcial citando la fuente correspondiente.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilean Copper Commission Research Department
    Chilean Copper Commission Research Department INVESTMENT IN THE CHILEAN MINING INDUSTRY Project Portfolio , 2013-­‐2021 DE / 08 / 2013 Intellectual Property Registration No. 231924 Translated by / Traducido Patricio por Mason, M.A. Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Mining Project Portfolio ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Copper Mining Projects ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Gold and Silver Mining Projects ................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Other Relevant Mining Segments ................................................................................................ 6 III. Projected Investment ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Investment Profiles ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Investment Distribution by Project Status and Type ................................................................... 7 3.3 Regional Distribution of Projected
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Mineralogical Characterization of the River Huasco (Norte Chico, Chile)
    XII Congreso Geológico Chileno Santiago, 22-26 Noviembre, 2009 S1_026 Chemical and Mineralogical characterization of the River Huasco (Norte Chico, Chile). Valdés, A.1,Polvé, M.1, Oliva, P.1, Morata, D.2 (1) Laboratoire des Mécanismes et Transferts en Géologie - UMR 5563 UR 154 CNRS Université Paul-Sabatier IRD Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées - 14, avenue Edouard Belin - 31400 Toulouse. (2) Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Plaza Ercilla, Santiago. [email protected] Geographical Context The area of study is located south of the third region of Atacama between the 28 and 29th southern latitude, corresponding to the Huasco River Valley. The origin of this river is located at the confluence of the rivers “El Tránsito” and “El Carmen”, which flows into the northern part of the city with the same name. The river Huasco extends for 88 kilometres and presents a basin of 9850 km2, with a general orientation east west. Geographically the total surface of the basin is equivalent to a 13% of the regional surface area (III region of Atacama). Through the Huasco River valley different urban centers can be found, for example, Puerto Huasco, Freirina, Vallenar y Alto del Carmen. According to the 2002 census, there exist 15 sites, from which two are cities and the rest rural areas. The cities found on the basin are Vallenar with 48040 inhabitants and Huasco with 7945. Objectives Considering geologic, geographic and meteorological characteristics of the study area, the goal of the present study is to characterize chemically and mineralogically the river Huasco through the analysis of water and sediment samples, collected between the cities of Alto del Carmen and Huasco.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Mining Projects in the Territory of the Diaguitas Huasco Altinos Agricultural Community in Chile
    CANADIAN MINING PROJECTS IN THE TERRITORY OF THE DIAGUITAS HUASCO ALTINOS AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY IN CHILE HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT OBSERVATORIO CIUDADANO © Observatorio Ciudadano December 2016 ISBN: 978-956-9315-05-3 EDITION: Observatorio Ciudadano COVER DESIGN AND DIAGRAMMING: Lola de la Maza COVER AND DOCUMENT PHOTOS: Photos provided by CADHA Communications Printed in Chile INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 STAKEHOLDERS MAP 6 Pascua Lama 7 El Morro 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 17 TO THE CHILEAN GOVERNMENT 17 TO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT 20 TO THE COMPANIES THAT OWN INVESTMENT PROJECTS 20 TO INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS 21 To the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 21 To the United Nations system 22 INTRODUCTION 23 I. METHODOLOGY 25 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 30 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CHILE 30 2. THE DIAGUITA 32 2.1. Historical information 32 2.2. From Estancia de los Huascoaltinos to the Diaguitas Huasco Altinos Agricultural Community 34 3. CURRENT SITUATION OF THE DIAGUITAS HUASCO ALTINOS AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY 47 III. THE PASCUA LAMA AND EL MORRO (NUEVA UNIÓN) MINING PROJECTS AND THE VISION OF THE COMMUNITY 53 1. THE MINING PROJECTS 53 1.1. Pascua Lama 53 1.2. El Morro/Corredor/Nueva Unión 62 2. THE COMMUNITY’S VISION ON THE PASCUA LAMA AND EL MORRO (NOW NUEVA UNIÓN) MINING PROJECTS 70 2.1. Lack of consultation and information on the granting of mining concessions in the community territory 71 2.2. Imposition of a mining model without the consent of the community 72 2.3. Strategies of co-optation, corruption, and disintegration of the social fabric 73 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Morro Copper-Gold Project, Region III, Chile
    Feasibility NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Morro Copper-Gold Project, Region III, Chile Prepared for Metallica Resources, Inc. May 9, 2008 70563 Feasibility NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Morro Copper-Gold Project Region III, Chile Prepared for Metallica Resources, Inc. May 9, 2008 70563 Prepared by Pincock, Allen & Holt Richard J. Lambert, P.E. Barton G. Stone, P.G. CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 1.1 Overview 1.1 1.2 Geology and Mineralization 1.1 1.2.1 Deposit Type 1.1 1.2.2 Eocene-Early Oligocene Intrusives 1.2 1.3 Exploration and Mining History 1.2 1.4 Drilling and Sampling 1.3 1.4.1 Sampling Method and Approach 1.3 1.5 Metallurgical Testing and Mineral Processing 1.4 1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate 1.4 1.7 Mining 1.7 1.8 Financial Model 1.8 1.9 Interpretation and Conclusions 1.8 1.9.1 Adequacy of Procedures 1.8 1.9.2 Adequacy of Data 1.8 1.9.3 Adequacy of Feasibility Study 1.8 1.9.4 Compliance with Canadian NI 43-101 Standards 1.9 1.9.5 Recommendations 1.9 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE 2.1 2.1 Qualified Persons and Participating Personnel 2.1 2.2 Terms and Definitions 2.1 2.3 Units 2.1 2.4 Source Document 2.2 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS 3.1 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 4.1 4.1 Location 4.1 4.2 Environmental Reports and Liabilities 4.1 4.3 Ownership 4.8 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 6.0 HISTORY 6.1 Pincock, Allen & Holt Page i 70563 May 9, 2008 CONTENTS (Continued) Page 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING 7.1 7.1 Regional Geology 7.1 7.1.1 Tectonic Significance of
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring to Support Water Quality Management in North-Central Chile
    Monitoring to Support Water Quality Management in North-Central Chile Lars Ribbea, *, Nicole Kretschmerb, Lena Saptalenaa, Ricardo Oyarzúnb,c, Mesenia Atenasd, Francisco Mezab,e and Eduardo Salgadof a Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ITT), Cologne University of Applied Sciences, Germany b Centre forAdvanced Studies in Arid Zones (CEAZA), Chile c Mines Engineering Department, University of La Serena, Chile d Chilean National Water Authority (DGA), Department of Water Resources Conservation and Protection, Santiago, Chile e Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Región Coquimbo, Chile f Catholic University of Valparaiso, Faculty of Agriculture, Chile * Email: [email protected] Abstract After describing the general relevance of water quality monitoring for sustainable water resources management this paper presents the current water quality issues and monitoring practice in Chile and approaches to optimize it, focussing on the semi-arid region of North- Central Chile. Water quality management requires scientifically sound data as a base for the decision making process. This data should be provided by suitable monitoring systems. In Chile, like in other countries, information requirements with regard to water quality are determined by the national water policy and legislation. In addition, monitoring system design needs to take into consideration the variability of the natural processes as well as pressures exerted to the systems by human activities, including pollution, water abstractions and climate change. At the end, social and political aspects determine how important water quality monitoring is for the country or region and economic aspects determine which monitoring intensity is feasible. However, a sound scientific knowledge can help to allocate resources for monitoring in the most efficient way.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Role of Institutions in Water Conflicts Final Report
    Analysis of the Role of Institutions in Water Conflicts Final Report Rojas, A., Reyes, B., Magzul, L., Morales, H. L., Borquez, R. and Schwartz, E July, 2008 IACC Project, Unit 1 B 1 Contributors: Alejandro Rojas , PhD, University of British Columbia, Canada. Investigator responsible for Unit 1 B of the Institutional Adaptation to Climate Change Project (IACC); co-investigator in the IACC Project. Bernardo Reyes , MSc, Political Ecology Institute of Chile (IEP), Chile. Coordinator of Unit 1 B in Chile; co-investigator in the IACC Project. Lorenzo Magzul , MSc., PhD student, University of British Columbia, Canada. Research Fellow in the IACC Project. Conducted fieldwork in southern Alberta, Canada, for the Oldman River Dam case study. Hector L. Morales , PhD; University of La Serena, Chile. Team member of Unit 1 B; Co- Investigator in the IACC Project. Roxana Borquez, BSc. Engineer in Renewable Natural Resources. University of Chile. Researcher with the Ecological Economics Unit at IEP.Conducted fieldwork in the Huasco Valley, Chile, for the Pascua Lama case study. Enrique Schwartz, BSc. Environmental Chemistry, University Técnica Federico Santa Maria. Researcher with the Ecological Economics Unit at IEP. Also, a researcher for the IACC project and conducted fieldwork in the Elqui Valley, Chile, for the Puclaro Dam case study. 2 Acknowledgments This report is the result of the collective work by all members of the team working for Unit 1 B, Analysis of the Role of Institutions in Water Conflicts, of the Institutional Adaptation to Climate Change Project. The team would like to thank Dr. David Sauchyn, University of Regina, co-investigator in the IACC project, for lending his home to the team when conducting fieldwork for the Oldman River Dam case study, and for his contribution of important ideas for Unit 1 B.
    [Show full text]