DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transit Plan Final Report - August 2015 Burke & Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transit Plan Final Report - August 2015 Burke & Company Montachusett Regional Transit Authority Regional Transit Plan Final Report - August 2015 Burke & Company TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ i Overview .................................................................................................................................................. i Recommended Phase Approach ............................................................................................................ ii Benefits .................................................................................................................................................. iv Cost Estimation ...................................................................................................................................... iv Framework ............................................................................................................................................. v Task Summaries ..................................................................................................................................... vi 1. Project Overview .....................................................................................................................1-1 2. Project Purpose .......................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Core Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 MART Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 2-2 3. MART ridership and Ridership Trends ......................................................................................3-1 3.1 Service Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Ridership ........................................................................................................................................ 3-3 3.3 Service Operations ........................................................................................................................ 3-6 3.4 Service Productivity ....................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.5 Financial Performance ................................................................................................................. 3-10 3.6 Service Frequency........................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.7 Ranking of Route Performance ................................................................................................... 3-12 3.8 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................. 3-13 4. Determining Demand ..............................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Regional Job Creation Goals and Employment Needs .................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Transit Market Analysis ................................................................................................................. 4-4 5. Fare Rates and Collection Methods ..........................................................................................5-1 5.1 Collection Methods ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Fare Structure ................................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 National Best Practices .................................................................................................................. 5-3 5.4 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 5-9 6. Environmental .........................................................................................................................6-1 6.1 GreenDOT Policy ............................................................................................................................ 6-3 6.2 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 6-31 7. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................7-1 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Strategies for Service Recommendation ....................................................................................... 7-1 7.3 Recommendations Overview ........................................................................................................ 7-3 7.4 Cost Estimation ............................................................................................................................ 7-11 7.5 Recommended Service Guidelines .............................................................................................. 7-12 7.6 Performance Measures ............................................................................................................... 7-16 7.7 Recommendation Profiles ........................................................................................................... 7-20 8. Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................8-1 Appendix A Market Demand Maps Appendix B Recommendation Memo Appendix C Public Outreach Appendix D Public Hearing Comments FIGURES Figure 1. MART Service Area .......................................................................................................................... i Figure 2. Proposed Route Network .............................................................................................................. iii Figure 3 Cost by Phase .................................................................................................................................. v Figure 4. MART Annual Ridership (FY 2012-FY 2014) ................................................................................ 3-3 Figure 5. MART Monthly Ridership (FY 2012 - FY 2014) ............................................................................ 3-4 Figure 6. MART Annual Ridership by Route (FY 2014) ............................................................................... 3-5 Figure 7. MART Ridership Growth (FY 2012 to FY 2014) ........................................................................... 3-5 Figure 8. MART Monthly Revenue Hours (FY 2012 – FY 2014) .................................................................. 3-6 Figure 9. MART Monthly Revenue Miles (FY 2012 – FY 2014) ................................................................... 3-7 Figure 10. MART Annual Operating Costs (FY 2012 – FY 2014) ................................................................. 3-7 Figure 11. MART Annual Ridership per Revenue Hour (FY 2012 – FY 2014) ............................................. 3-8 Figure 12. MART Productivity by Route (FY 2014) ..................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 13. MART Productivity Change by Route (FY 2012 to FY 2014) ...................................................... 3-9 Figure 14. MART Annual Farebox Recovery (FY 2012 – FY 2014) ............................................................ 3-10 Figure 15. MART Annual Subsidy per Passenger (FY 2012 – FY 2014) ..................................................... 3-11 Figure 16. MART Subsidy per Passenger (FY 2014) .................................................................................. 3-11 Figure 17. MART Service Frequency vs. Productivity ............................................................................... 3-12 Figure 18. Montachusett Region Top Employees and MART Transit Service ............................................ 4-3 Figure 19. Older Populations ..................................................................................................................... 4-5 Figure 20. Population Density .................................................................................................................... 4-6 Figure 21. Employment Density ................................................................................................................. 4-7 Figure 22. Transit Demand - Level of Service ............................................................................................. 4-8 Figure 23. Median Household Income ....................................................................................................... 4-9 Figure 24. Zero Vehicle Households......................................................................................................... 4-10 Figure 25. Underserved Areas.................................................................................................................. 4-13 Figure 26. Area A: Lunenburg .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Financial Analysis
    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Park & Ride Commuter Lots
    Park &RideCommuterLots Serving I–270 and US 29 Corridors in Montgomery County A Handy Guide to Free Parking and An Easier Commute to Work Effective July 2002 Tired of fighting the traffic ? Want to make your commute to work easier and less stressful? Spending too much money parking your car downtown? Need a place to meet your carpool or vanpool? Free Park & Ride Commuter Lots may be the answer to your quest. Commuters may park their vehicles in most of Montgomery County’s Park & Ride Lots at no cost. There are a few lots, however, that may require a parking permit and fee. You can meet your carpools or vanpools, or take public transit from these lots. Park & Ride...Make it easier for yourself. Use this brochure as a guide to Park & Ride Commuter Lots along the I-270 and U.S. 29 Corridors, including selected Lots in neighbor- ing jurisdictions. For more information on bus routes serving these lots, contact the following service providers. Montgomery County Commuter Services Free personalized assistance to help commuters join a carpool or vanpool. Promotes alternative trans- portation benefits for employees. The Commuter Express Store, located at 8401 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, sells fare media, such as Metrobus/rail passes, tickets, and tokens, and Ride On bus passes and tickets. Pick up timetables and transportation information (301) 770-POOL (7665) www.rideonbus.com (click on Commuter Services) Ride On Bus (routes, schedules, fares) (240) 777-7433 (touchtone) (240) 777-5871 (rotary) (240) 777-5869 (TTY/TDD) www.rideonbus.com (passes and tokens sold online) Prince George’s County THE BUS (301) 324-BUSS (routes & schedules) 1-800-735-2258 (TDD) Department of Public Works and Transportation (301) 925-5656–Office of Transportation www.goprincegeorgescounty.com CONNECT-A-RIDE A fixed route community–based bus service in the mid–Baltimore/Washington suburban area.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket/Notice of Public Hearing
    Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B17-01: Proposed FY2018 Operating Budget and Docket B17-02: Proposed FY2018 Capital Improvement Program and Federal FY2017 Grant Applications Purpose Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the two dockets noted above as follows: Hearing No. 613 Monday, January 30, 2017 Metro Headquarters Building 600 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Open House 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing at 5 p.m. Speaker registration is on-site only and closes at 9 p.m. Please note that this date is subject to Metro’s inclement weather cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, Metro will post information about a new hearing on wmata.com. The public hearing location is wheelchair accessible. Any individual who requires special assistance such as a sign language interpreter or additional accommodation to participate in the public hearing, or who requires these materials in an alternate format, should contact Danise Peña at 202-962-2511 or TTY: 202-962-2033 as soon as possible in order for Metro to make necessary arrangements. For language assistance, such as an interpreter or information in another language, please call 202-962-2582 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing date. For more information please visit www.wmata.com/budget. In accordance with Section 62 of the WMATA Compact, Metro will conduct a public hearing at the location listed in this notice. Information on the hearing will be provided in area libraries, in Metrorail stations, on Metrobus and MetroAccess vehicles, and online at www.wmata.com/budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial District TROLLEY SERVICE CONCEPT EVALUATION
    Centennial District TROLLEY SERVICE CONCEPT EVALUATION OCTOBER 2019 MD dDELAWARE VALLEY DVR PC's vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, e'J.,JffPC resilient, and sustainable region that increases PLANNING COMMISSION mobility choices by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; that protects and preserves our natural resources while creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater opportunities for all. DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged across the region, and strive to be leaders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE / DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination mandates in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can usually be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC's public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and held in transit-accessible locations whenever possible. Translation, interpretation, or other auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting. Translation and interpretation services for DVRPC's projects, products, and planning processes are available, generally free of charge, by calling (275) 592-7800. All requests will be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by DVRPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft II Baltimore Link
    A Plan to Connect Baltimore What is BaltimoreLink? . Improve service quality and reliability Linking Modes . Maximize access to high-frequency transit Places People . Strengthen connections between the MTA’s bus and rail routes Improving Safety . Align the network with existing and emerging Efficiency job centers Reliability . Involve riders, employees, communities, and Customer Service elected officials in the planning process 2 Existing Service We’ve heard the existing transit system is… Broken Disconnected Crowded Unclean Major Problems: Unreliable • Lengthy Routes – Long east-west and north-south routes Not connected to • Highly Congested – Buses bottleneck due to jobs network design • Unreliable – Network design hinders MTA’s ability to provide reliable service 3 The Solution - The BaltimoreLink Network . High-frequency routes into and throughout urban core • Color-coded routes • All lines access Downtown • 24 hours of service per day • Designed to connect to all other CityLink routes and to Rail Stations . Local Routes connecting to CityLink routes • Neighborhood connectivity • Suburb-to-urban core connectivity . Limited stop routes into urban core and suburb-to-suburb • Connecting to Regional Job Centers and Downtown To be integrated seamlessly with: 4 1st Draft Outreach October 2015 – February 2016 . BaltimoreLink Outreach built upon the effort accomplished as part of the 2013 Baltimore Network Improvement Project (BNIP) 13 public workshops over 790 and 4 pop- attendees . MTA gathered over 1,280 ups comments from 67 key events 26 24 elected stakeholder officials and briefed community group meetings 5 st 4% 1 Draft Outreach 6% Comment Submittal and Topic 7% 9% 61% submitted online (mySideWalk or Survey Monkey) 60% 11% 24% submitted comment form 11% Specific BaltimoreLink Route Proposal 15% submitted in other formats Forced Transfer (hotline, email, verbal, or other) Safety/Cleanliness Information/ Resources .
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Microtransit Program
    Frederick TransIT Transit Development Plan TSAC Meeting ǀ April 16, 2020 Today’s Focus ▰ Review of Existing Services ▰ TransIT Ridership ▰ Performance Measures ▰ Funding Sources ▰ Next Steps: Looking Towards Alternatives 2 2 Existing Services Analysis ▰ Frederick County TransIT ▰ Other Providers ▰ Fixed Route Connectors ▰ MDOT MTA Commuter Bus ▰ Commuter Shuttles ▰ MARC Commuter Rail ▰ Taxi Access Program ▰ Uber/Lyft ▰ TransIT Plus Demand ▰ Taxi Companies Response ▰ ADA Paratransit ▰ ADA Paratransit 3 3 TransIT System Map ▰ Transfers available at Transit Center, Frederick Towne Mall, and Francis Scott Key Mall 4 4 Connectors: 2019 and 2020 Ridership Comparison Route Apr - Oct 2019 Apr - Oct 2020 Percent Change Route 10 45,014 20,282 -54.9% Route 20 47,451 30,695 -35.3% Route 40 50,535 35,662 -29.4% Route 50 36,670 25,955 -29.2% Route 51 46,603 16,753 -64.1% Route 60 29,392 16,053 -45.4% Route 61 21,377 7,178 -66.4% Route 65 27,275 13,230 -51.5% 5 Route 80 10,691 5,322 -50.2% 5 Connector Ridership by Stop (2020) ▰ Highest ridership stops were generally those with available transfers ▰ TransIT Center ▰ Frederick Towne Mall ▰ Francis Scott Key Mall ▰ Walmart on Buckeystown Pike also had high 6 ridership 6 FY2020 MDOT MTA Performance ▰ MDOT MTA established performance measures for locally operated transit systems in Maryland. Measures include: ▰ Cost per hour ▰ Cost per mile ▰ Cost per trip ▰ Farebox Recovery ▰ Trips per Mile 7 ▰ Trips per hour 7 Operating Funds FY2020 Source Total Cost Federal/State Local Fares Section 5307 Fixed Route $2,415,868
    [Show full text]
  • (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis
    Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis Submitted to: Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission Submitted by: PB Americas, Inc. Under contract to: The Corradino Group, Inc. October 2009 KAT Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis CORRADINO Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Corridor Analysis 3 Transit Oriented Development 3 High Capacity Transit Options 4 3. Potential Corridors 15 Corridor 1: Cumberland Avenue/Kingston Pike Corridor 17 Corridor 2: Norfolk Southern Railroad Corridor 29 Corridor 3: Western Avenue Corridor 41 Corridor 4: North Broadway Street Corridor 52 Corridor 5: Magnolia Avenue Corridor 64 Corridor 6: Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue Corridor 74 Corridor 7: Chapman Highway/James White Parkway Corridor 84 Corridor 8: Alcoa – Knoxville Rail Corridor 95 4. Cost Estimates 107 5. Evaluation Matrices 111 6. Next Steps 115 I:\Projects\3880\wp\Reports\Corridor Analysis (TM3)\text.doc Page i KAT Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis List of Figures CORRADINO Figure 2-1 Typical Components of TOD 3 Figure 2-2 Silver Line, Boston 7 Figure 2-3 Queue Jumper, Lane Co., Ore. 7 Figure 2-4 Median Busway, Richmond, Va. 8 Figure 2-5 Guided Bus, Essen, Germany 9 Figure 2-6 Seattle Busway Tunnel 9 Figure 2-7 Portland Streetcar LRT 10 Figure 2-8 Cleveland RTA LRT 10 Figure 2-9 Chicago Metra Locomotive-Hauled Commuter Rail 12 Figure 2-10 New York Commuter Rail EMU 13 Figure 2-11 Diesel Multiple Unit 13 Figure 3-1 High Potential Transit Corridors 16 Figure 3-2 Cumberland Avenue near 19th
    [Show full text]
  • Cyride System Redesign: Final Report City of Ames
    CyRide System Redesign | State of the System City of Ames CyRide System Redesign: Final Report City of Ames August 2017 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i CyRide System Redesign | State of the System City of Ames Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 System Redesign Guiding Principles ................................................................................................. ES-1 System Redesign Operational Goals ............................................................................................... ES-2 The Market for Transit ......................................................................................................................... ES-2 Peer Review ........................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Review of Plans and Development .................................................................................................... ES-3 Existing Transit Services ....................................................................................................................... ES-5 System Redesign Civic Engagement .................................................................................................. ES-7 Short-Term Recommendations ............................................................................................................ ES-8 Short-Term Recommendations Phasing
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTIONS from BALTIMORE • Take Interstate 95 Northeast (Kennedy Memorial Highway) for Approximately 50 to 55 Minutes
    DIRECTIONS FROM BALTIMORE • Take Interstate 95 Northeast (Kennedy Memorial Highway) for approximately 50 to 55 minutes. (It is about 56 miles from Baltimore to the exit for Delaware Park.) • Leave Interstate 95 at Exit 4B (Stanton, Churchman's Road). • You are now on Delaware Route 1/Route 7 headed North. Continue directly ahead for approximately 1 1/2 miles or 5 traffic lights. (After approximately 1/2 a mile the designation as Route 1 ends and the road becomes Route4/Route 7.) • Turn left at the fifth traffic light. This is Delaware Park Boulevard. • Follow the road past Slot Valet parking, past Racetrack Valet parking, continue following the road over the White Clay Creek the Clubhouse is on your left hand side. FROM CHESAPEAKE BAY BRIDGE • Take Route 301 North to Middletown (Approximately 40 minutes or 45 miles). •In Middletown take 299 East for approximately 1 1/2 miles to Route 1/Route 13. • Take Routes 1/13 North over the new Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at St. Georges (Approximately 10 Minutes or 10 Miles). •Follow Route 1 to the Christiana Mall area. • You are now on Delaware Route 1/Route 7 headed North. Continue directly ahead for approximately 1 1/2 miles or 5 traffic lights. (After approximately 3/4 of a mile the designation as Route 1 ends and the road becomes Route4/Route 7. It is the same road just different numbers.) •Turn left at the fifth traffic light. This is Delaware Park Boulevard. • Follow the road past Slot Valet parking, past Racetrack Valet parking, continue following the road over the White Clay Creek the Clubhouse is on your left hand side.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimorelink Winter 2017 Outreach Report
    BaltimoreLink Winter 2017 Outreach Report The Maryland Department of Transportation’s Maryland Transit Administration Posted April 3, 2017 BaltimoreLink Winter 2017 Outreach Report April 2017 By Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning and Jacobs Engineering Group For the Maryland Department of Transportation’s Maryland Transit Administration Public Hearing Outreach Report (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) BaltimoreLink Public Hearing Outreach Report Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Outreach Components ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Hearing Locations .............................................................................................................................. 1 Scheduled Hearings .................................................................................................................................... 2 Inclement Weather Plan ............................................................................................................................ 5 Feedback Collection Methods ...................................................................................................................... 5 Operator In-Reach ......................................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Bakersfield Transit System Long-Range Plan
    Golden Empire Transit District | Kern Council of Governments METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD TRANSIT SYSTEM LONG-RANGE PLAN Final Report April 2012 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Golden Empire Transit • Karen King, Chief Executive Officer • Gina Hayden, Marketing Manager • Emery Rendez, Planner Kern Council of Governments • Rob Ball, Interim Director • Ron Brummett, Executive Director (Retired December 2011) • Bob Snoddy, Regional Planner CONSULTANT TEAM Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates • Linda Rhine, Project Manager • Paul Jewel, Deputy Project Manager • Steve Boland, Lead Service Planner • Kara Vuicich, Financial Planner • Anneka Imkamp, GIS /Cartographer Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants • Richard Lee, Modeler • Kyle Cooke, Assistant Modeler VRPA Technologies, Inc. • Georgiena M. Vivian, Marketing Specialist • Dena Graham, Marketing Assistant Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Best Practices .......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Public Outreach .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]