Tea but No Sympathy – a Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Tea but no sympathy – A summary Social sustainability of tea consumed in Finland Supported by crowdfunding organised on the People´s Cultural Foundation’s Kulttuurilahja -plat- form and by the Finnwatch Decent Work Research Programme. The Programme is supported by: An abbreviated and translated version of the original Finnish report. In the event of interpretation disputes the Finnish text applies. The original is available at www.fi nnwatch.org. Finnwatch is a non-profi t organisation that investigates the global impacts of Finnish business en- terprises. Finnwatch is supported by 11 development, environmental and consumer organisations and trade unions: The International Solidarity Foundation ISF, Finnish Development NGOs – Fingo, The Finnish Evangelical Lutheran Mission Felm, Pro Ethical Trade Finland, The Trade Union Solidarity Centre of Finland SASK, Attac, Finn Church Aid, The Dalit Solidarity Network in Finland, Friends of the Earth Finland, KIOS Foundation and The Consumers’ Union of Finland. Layout: Petri Clusius/Amfi bi ky Publication date: October 2019 Cover photo: A worker on a tea plantation in the Nuwara Eliya district in Sri Lanka. The person in the photo is not connected to Finnwatch’s investigation. Finnwatch will not publish pictures of the individuals who were intervie- wed for this report due to consideration for their safety. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. INDIA: THE NILGIRIS ...................................................................................................................... 5 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 5 The Estates ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Working and living conditions at tea plantations in the Nilgiris ..................................................... 7 3. INDIA: ASSAM .............................................................................................................................. 19 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 19 Jalinga Tea ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Working and living conditions at Jalinga Tea, Assam ..................................................................... 20 4. SRI LANKA: NUWARA ELIYA AND RATNAPUTRA ................................................................... 28 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 28 The Pedro Estate ............................................................................................................................ 28 The Opata Estate ............................................................................................................................ 29 Working and living conditions at the Pedro Estate and the Opata Estate .................................... 30 5. CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................. 41 6. RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................. 44 3 1. Introduction Millions of people in tea producing countries The current climate crisis has a signifi - are directly engaged in the production of tea cant impact on the cultivation of tea. Tea is and many more depend on it for their live- said to be one of the crops most adversely lihood. Labour rights abuses are prevalent affected by climate change. Changes in its and well-documented at tea plantations in yield, quality and production areas will have many of the producing countries. This report an impact on tea prices and demand for tea, explores the working conditions in the pro- the livelihood of millions of people and the duction of the tea consumed in Finland. The economy of the producing countries. Tea cul- tea plantations covered are suppliers to both tivation also has adverse ecological impacts. Finnish tea houses and international brands. The industry needs to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies to cope with climate More than one million kilos of tea is con- change.6 sumed in Finland each year. The Finnish tea market’s value is approximately 55 million The original version of this report, written euros.1 The biggest Finnish tea houses are in Finnish7, was published in October 2019. Forsman Tea and Nordqvist, but international This abbreviated English version includes brands Twinings (market leader) and Unilever in full the fi eld research fi ndings, conclu- dominate the market. Private label tea sions and recommendations presented in products are also gaining in popularity.2 the original report. Both have been fi nanced by crowdfunding organised on the People´s Although both Finnish tea houses source tea Cultural Foundation Kulttuurilahja -platform directly from the producing countries and and by the Finnwatch Decent Work Research fl avour and pack their products in Finland, Programme. the majority of the tea consumed in Finland is imported from other European countries as ready-made tea products for the con- sumer market. In addition to international brand products that are imported to Finland from countries such as Poland and the UK, all of Finland’s major grocery retail chains, Kesko, S Group and Lidl Finland, source their private label teas nearly exclusively from Central European tea houses. One private label product is sourced from a Sri Lankan manufacturer. Each year, around 48,000 kilos of Fairtrade certifi ed tea is sold in Finland3. According to a rough estimate, the Rainforest Alliance and UTZ combined have approximately a 20 percent market share of all tea sold in super- markets4. The demand for organic tea is on the rise5 but beyond the scope of this report. 6 Han W. et al., 2018, Tea cultivation under changing cli- 1 Kauppalehti, 14.2.2019, Nordqvist tähtää Suomen ar- matic conditions. In: Sharma, V. S. and Gunasekare, M. vostetuimmaksi teebrändiksi (‘Nordqvist aiming to be- T. K. (eds), Global tea science: Current status and futu- come the most valued Finnish tea brand’) re needs, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambrid- 2 Finnpartnership, Tea in Finland 2017 ge, UK 3 Fairtrade Finland, Jenni Sundberg, email on 9.9.2019 7 Finnwatch, 2019, Teetä ilman sympatiaa – Suomessa 4 Rainforest Alliance, Sven Drillenburg, email on kulutettavan teen sosiaalinen vastuullisuus, available at 26.9.2019 https://fi nnwatch.org/images/pdf/Teeta_ilman_sympa- 5 Euromonitor, Tea in Finland 2019 tiaa_fi nal.pdf 4 2. India: The Nilgiris Interviewees were selected randomly from among all workers at the three estates. Most of the interviewees were tasked with tea METHODOLOGY plucking and maintenance, others with dis- The Craigmore Plantations, Glenworth Estate tributing agrochemicals. All the interviewees and United Nilgiri Tea Estates were selected were from Scheduled Castes (Dalit) or as sites for Finnwatch fi eld research by com- Scheduled Tribes (indigenous peoples). Both paring the supplier information that Forsman groups face systematic discrimination and Tea and Nordqvist provided to Finnwatch and poverty in India.10 the publicly available information on other tea brands’ suppliers8. As is required by Finnwatch’s Ethical Guidelines, the Craigmore Plantations, Between August and October 2018, Cividep Glenworth Estate and United Nilgiri Tea India9 researchers conducted interviews Estates as well as the certifi cation schemes with 20 workers from each of the three Rainforest Alliance, UTZ and Fairtrade were plantations. Worker interviews were pre- given the opportunity to comment on the dominantly conducted on the estates in fi eld research fi ndings before their publi- the workers’ living quarters in conditions cation. Their comments are incorporated that ensured confi dentiality. In addition, below where relevant. Both the Craigmore Cividep researchers interviewed repre- Plantations and United Nilgiri Tea Estates sentatives of local, state and national trade said the fi ndings were false and threatened unions that represent plantation workers. Finnwatch with legal action should the In October 2018, a Finnwatch researcher organisation proceed with the report’s visited the Nilgiris and conducted interviews publication. with tea plantation workers and trade union representatives. The Rainforest Alliance and UTZ, which are in the process of merging and will in future Most of the interviewees were originally use the name Rainforest Alliance, submit- from Tamil Nadu. They were interviewed in ted a single, joint response to Finnwatch. In their mother tongue, Tamil. A small portion the response, the Rainforest Alliance said of interviewees were migrant workers from that they welcomed Finnwatch’s research Jharkhand, who were interviewed in Hindi. All and that it would help the Rainforest Alliance interviews by the Finnwatch researcher were improve its own systems and the condi- conducted with the help of an interpreter. tions in the plantations that it certifi ed. The Table 1: Composition of the interview sample in the Nilgiris Craigmore Plantations Glenworth Estate United Nilgiri Tea Estates Gender: female/male