The Annual Report on the Most Valuable British Brands April 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Annual Report on the Most Valuable British Brands April 2017 United Kingdom 150 2017 The annual report on the most valuable British brands April 2017 Foreword. Contents steady downward spiral of poor communication, Foreword 2 wasted resources and a negative impact on the bottom line. Definitions 4 Methodology 6 Brand Finance bridges the gap between the marketing and financial worlds. Our teams have Excecutive Summary 8 experience across a wide range of disciplines from market research and visual identity to tax and Full Tables (GPBm & USDm) 14 accounting. We understand the importance of design, advertising and marketing, but we also Understand Your Brand’s Value 20 believe that the ultimate and overriding purpose of How We Can Help 22 brands is to make money. That is why we connect brands to the bottom line. Contact Details 23 By valuing brands, we provide a mutually intelligible language for marketers and finance teams. David Haigh, CEO, Brand Finance Marketers then have the ability to communicate the significance of what they do and boards can use What is the purpose of a strong brand; to attract the information to chart a course that maximises customers, to build loyalty, to motivate staff? All profits. true, but for a commercial brand at least, the first Without knowing the precise, financial value of an answer must always be ‘to make money’. asset, how can you know if you are maximising your returns? If you are intending to license a brand, how Huge investments are made in the design, launch can you know you are getting a fair price? If you are and ongoing promotion of brands. Given their intending to sell, how do you know what the right potential financial value, this makes sense. time is? How do you decide which brands to Unfortunately, most organisations fail to go beyond discontinue, whether to rebrand and how to arrange that, missing huge opportunities to effectively make your brand architecture? Brand Finance has use of what are often their most important assets. conducted thousands of brand and branded Monitoring of brand performance should be the business valuations to help answer these questions. next step, but is often sporadic. Where it does take place it frequently lacks financial rigour and is Brand Finance’s recently conducted share price heavily reliant on qualitative measures poorly study revealed the compelling link between strong understood by non-marketers. brands and stock market performance. It was found that investing in the most highly branded companies As a result, marketing teams struggle to would lead to a return almost double that of the communicate the value of their work and boards average for the S&P 500 as a whole. then underestimate the significance of their brands Acknowledging and managing a company’s to the business. Skeptical finance teams, intangible assets taps into the hidden value that lies unconvinced by what they perceive as marketing within it. The following report is a first step to mumbo jumbo may fail to agree necessary understanding more about brands, how to value investments. What marketing spend there is can them and how to use that information to benefit the end up poorly directed as marketers are left to business. The team and I look forward to continuing operate with insufficient financial guidance or the conversation with you. accountability. The end result can be a slow but 2. Brand Finance AustraliaGlobalAirlinesUnited Kingdom500 30 100 30February MarchFebruary 150 20162016April 2015 2017 Brand Finance United Kingdom 150 April 2017 3. Definitions Effect of a Brand on Stakeholders Definitions E.g. + Enterprise Value – the value of the Unilever entire enterprise, made up of Directors Potential Middle ‘Branded‘Branded multiple branded businesses Customers Managers Enterprise’Enterprise’ Existing All Other ‘Branded‘Branded + Branded Business Value – the Customers Employees Business’ E.g. Business’ Dove value of a single branded business operating under the subject brand ‘Brand’ Contribution’ Influencers Production + Brand Contribution– The total e.g. Media Brand E.g. economic benefit derived by a Dove business from its brand ‘Brand Value’ Trade Sales Channels + Brand Value – the value of the E.g. trade marks (and relating Dove Strategic marketing IP and ‘goodwill’ Debt Allies & providers attached to it) within the branded Suppliers Investors business Branded Business Value Brand Contribution Brand Value Brand Strength A brand should be viewed in the context of the The brand values contained in our league tables In the very broadest sense, a brand is the focus Brand Strength is the part of our analysis most business in which it operates. For this reason are those of the potentially transferable brand for all the expectations and opinions held by directly and easily influenced by those Brand Finance always conducts a Branded asset only, but for marketers and managers customers, staff and other stakeholders about an responsible for marketing and brand Business Valuation as part of any brand valuation. alike, an assessment of overall brand contribution organisation and its products and services. management. In order to determine the strength Where a company has a purely mono-branded to a business provides powerful insights to help However, when looking at brands as business of a brand we have developed the Brand architecture, the business value is the same as optimise performance. assets that can be bought, sold and licensed, a Strength Index (BSI). We analyse marketing the overall company value or ‘enterprise value’. more technical definition is required. investment, brand equity (the goodwill Brand Contribution represents the overall uplift accumulated with customers, staff and other In the more usual situation where a company in shareholder value that the business derives Brand Finance helped to craft the internationally stakeholders) and finally the impact of those on owns multiple brands, business value refers to from owning the brand rather than operating a recognised standard on Brand Valuation, ISO business performance. the value of the assets and revenue stream of the generic brand. 10668. That defines a brand as “a marketing- business line attached to that brand specifically. related intangible asset including, but not limited Following this analysis, each brand is assigned We evaluate the full brand value chain in order to Brands affect a variety of stakeholders, not just to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos and a BSI score out of 100, which is fed into the understand the links between marketing customers but also staff, strategic partners, designs, or a combination of these, intended to brand value calculation. Based on the score, investment, brand tracking data, stakeholder regulators, investors and more, having a identify goods, services or entities, or a each brand in the league table is assigned a behaviour and business value to maximise the significant impact on financial value beyond combination of these, creating distinctive images rating between AAA+ and D in a format similar returns business owners can obtain from their what can be bought or sold in a transaction. and associations in the minds of stakeholders, to a credit rating. AAA+ brands are exceptionally brands. thereby generating economic benefits/value”. strong and well managed while a failing brand would be assigned a D grade. 4. Brand Finance United Kingdom 150 April 2017 Brand Finance United Kingdom 150 April 2017 5. Methodology League Table Valuation Methodology Brand Finance Typical Project Approach Brand Finance calculates the values of the 2 Determine the royalty rate range for the respective brands in its league tables using the ‘Royalty brand sectors. This is done by reviewing comparable Relief approach’. This approach involves licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s estimating the likely future sales that are extensive database of license agreements and other attributable to a brand and calculating a royalty online databases. Brand Equity Stakeholder Brand Inputs Performance rate that would be charged for the use of the 3 Calculate royalty rate. The brand strength score is Value Drivers Behaviour Contribution brand, i.e. what the owner would have to pay for applied to the royalty rate range to arrive at a royalty the use of the brand—assuming it were not rate. For example, if the royalty rate range in a brand’s already owned. sector is 0-5% and a brand has a brand strength score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty 1 2 3 4 The steps in this process are as follows: rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will Brand Audit Trial & Preference Acquisition & Valuation Modelling be 4%. Retention 1 Calculate brand strength on a scale of 0 to 100 based 4 Determine brand specific revenues estimating a on a number of attributes such as emotional proportion of parent company revenues attributable Audit the impact Run analytics to Link stakeholder Model the impact of behaviour on connection, financial performance and sustainability, to a specific brand. of brand understand how behaviour with core financial performance and among others. This score is known as the Brand key financial isolating the value of the brand 5 Determine forecast brand specific revenues using a management and perceptions link to Strength Index, and is calculated using brand data investment on behaviour value drivers contribution function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts from the BrandAsset® Valuator database, the world’s brand equity and economic growth rates. largest database of brands, which measures brand 6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to equity, consideration and emotional imagery derive brand revenues. attributes to assess brand personality in a category 7 Brand revenues are discounted post tax to a net agnostic manner. present value which equals the brand value. Brand strength Brand Brand revenues Brand value index ‘Royalty rate’ How We Help to Maximise Value (BSI) 6. Build scale through licensing/franchising/partnerships Brand Strong brand investment 5.
Recommended publications
  • Lot 1 Collection of Decorative Glassware Including Uranium Glass (1 Tray) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% Inc VAT
    Byrne's Auctioneers - General & Collectors Auction - Starts 04 Sep 2019 Lot 1 Collection of decorative glassware including uranium glass (1 tray) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 2 Masonic regalia, leather bag, glassware, ceramics etc (1 tray) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 3 Gilt framed Baxter print; also further gilt framed prints and framed telegram (6) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 4 Mason's Ironstone Mandalay pattern jug and pedestal bowl; also pair of silver plated candlesticks, silver plated figures, further ceramics (1 tray) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 5 Vintage treen including butter pats; also pewter tankards etc (1 tray) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 6 Andrew Hutchinson, framed limited edition print; also an unframed print (2) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 7 Victorian Staffordshire spaniel; also Belleek porcelain tea wares, blue and white printware, other decorative ceramics and glass (3 trays) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 8 Chinese blue and white Prunus pattern ginger jar with printed Kangxi mark, 19th Century Spode china, saucers, further decorative china including jugs (2 trays) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 8a Watercolour landscape painting, further framed landscape prints and a framed Michael Bell pastel (5) Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 9 Victorian Staffordshire spaniel, further decorative china including Pendelfin figures, Crested ware battleship, majolica dishes Estimate: 0 - 0 Fees: 21% inc VAT Lot 10 W Watson & Sons Ltd London, 1917 binoculars with
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    PARTICIPANT LIST Please find below a list of current participants in the Quarterly Salary Review. For a complete list by super sector, sector and segment refer to Mercer WIN®. 3M Australia API 7-Eleven Stores API Management A Menarini Australia APL Co. (Aus) - BR A.P.Moller-Maersk AS (AU) Apotex Abbott Australasia APT Management Services (APA Group) AbbVie Aquila Resources Actelion Pharmaceuticals Australia Arrium Mining & Materials Adama Australia Arrow Electronics Australia Adelaide Brighton Asahi Beverages Australia Adelaide Football Club Asaleo Care Australia adidas Australia Ascendas Hospitality Australia Fund Management Adventist Healthcare Aspen Australia AECOM Astrazeneca Afton Chemical Asia Pacific LLC AT & T Global Network Services Australia Aggreko Australia ATCO Australia AIA Australia Atlas Iron Aimia Proprietary Loyalty Australia Ausenco Air New Zealand – Australia AusGroup Akzo Nobel Australia Australia Post Alcatel-Lucent Australia Australian Catholic University Alcon (Novartis) Laboratories Australia Australian Computer Society Alexion Australasia Australian Fashion Labels Allergan Australian Red Cross Blood Service Alphapharm Avaloq Australia Alstom Transport Australia Aveo Group Amadeus IT Pacific Aviall Australia American Express Global Business Travel Australia AVJennings Holdings Amgen Australia Avon Products AMT Group BaptistCare NSW & ACT Amway of Australia Barminco Apex Tool Group BASF Australia © March 2017 Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Quarterly Salary Review 4.1 PARTICIPANT LIST Beam Global Australia
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How Different Types of Methodologies Can Help to Answer Different Types of Questions
    A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How different types of methodologies can help to answer different types of questions Gabriela Salinas, Global Brand Manager, Deloitte and Tim Ambler, Senior Fellow, London Business School Abstract Brands can be valued using a variety of techniques. Like any tool, each technique may be suitable for some purposes and not for others. This paper classifies the methodologies according to the approach and premises they adopt and suitability for different types of applications. We also indicate flaws in methodologies either in general or for particular purposes. Classification is complicated by specialist firms seeking to differentiate methodologies (“proprietary models”) for their own marketing purposes. Much of this differentiation is little more than re-labeling. The 24 methods of brand valuation, and 52 specialist providers, garnered from the literature represent possibly hundreds of commercial and academic approaches by the multitude of providers around the world. After removing those that do not appear to be used in practice we were left with 18 practical methods which we analyze and classify. This taxonomy is intended as a guide to current and potential users of brand valuation through the jungle that the proliferation of proprietary brand valuation techniques has created. May 14, 2008 Contact: [email protected], [email protected] © 2008 Gabriela Salinas and Tim Ambler A Taxonomy of Brand Valuation Methodologies: How different types of methodologies can help to answer different types of questions Since the 1980s, marketers have been under increasing pressure for “accountability” in two senses: being responsible for the results from marketing activity and reporting those results using the language of finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Finance
    Australia 100 2019 The annual report on the most valuable and strongest Australian brands January 2019 Contents. About Brand Finance 4 Get in Touch 4 Request Your Brand Value Report 5 Foreword 6 Brand Value Analysis 8 Brand Strength Index Analysis 11 Sector Reputation Analysis 12 Brand Finance Australia 100 (AUD m) 14 Definitions 16 Brand Valuation Methodology 18 Market Research Methodology 19 Stakeholder Equity Measures 19 Consulting Services 20 Brand Evaluation Services 21 Communications Services 22 Brand Finance Network 24 Brand Finance Australia 100 January 2019 3 Request Your About Brand Finance. Brand Value Report. Brand Finance is the world’s leading independent A Brand Value Report provides a complete Each report includes expert recommendations for growing brand valuation and strategy consultancy. breakdown of the assumptions, data sources, and brand value to drive business performance and offers a calculations used to arrive at your brand’s value. cost-effective way to gaining a better understanding of Brand Finance was set up in 1996 with the aim of ‘bridging your position against competitors. the gap between marketing and finance’. For more than 20 years, we have helped companies and organisations of all types to connect their brands to the bottom line. We pride ourselves on four key strengths: What is a Brand Value Report? What are the benefits of a Brand Value Report? + Independence + Transparency Brand Valuation Summary + Technical Credibility + Expertise + Internal understanding of brand + Brand value tracking We put thousands of the world’s biggest brands to the + Competitor benchmarking Insight test every year, evaluating which are the strongest and + Historical brand value most valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Directory
    ROYAL WARRANT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION MEMBERS’ DIRECTORY 2019–2020 SECRETARY’S FOREWORD 3 WELCOME Dear Reader, The Royal Warrant Holders Association represents one of the most diverse groups of companies in the world in terms of size and sector, from traditional craftspeople to global multinationals operating at the cutting edge of technology. The Members’ Directory lists companies by broad categories that further underline the range of skills, products and services that exist within the membership. Also included is a section dedicated to our principal charitable arm, the Queen Elizabeth Scholarship Trust (QEST), of which HRH The Prince of Wales is Patron. The section profiles the most recent alumni of scholars and apprentices to have benefited from funding, who have each developed their skills and promoted excellence in British craftsmanship. As ever, Royal Warrant holders and QEST are united in our dedication to service, quality and excellence as symbolised by the Royal Warrant of Appointment. We hope you find this printed directory of use when thinking of manufacturers and suppliers of products and services. An online version – which is regularly updated with company information and has enhanced search facilities – can be viewed on our website, www.royalwarrant.org “UNITED IN OUR DEDICATION TO Richard Peck SERVICE, QUALITY CEO & Secretary AND EXCELLENCE” The Royal Warrant Holders Association CONTENTS Directory of members Agriculture & Animal Welfare ...............................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Tea but No Sympathy – a Summary
    Tea but no sympathy – A summary Social sustainability of tea consumed in Finland Supported by crowdfunding organised on the People´s Cultural Foundation’s Kulttuurilahja -plat- form and by the Finnwatch Decent Work Research Programme. The Programme is supported by: An abbreviated and translated version of the original Finnish report. In the event of interpretation disputes the Finnish text applies. The original is available at www.fi nnwatch.org. Finnwatch is a non-profi t organisation that investigates the global impacts of Finnish business en- terprises. Finnwatch is supported by 11 development, environmental and consumer organisations and trade unions: The International Solidarity Foundation ISF, Finnish Development NGOs – Fingo, The Finnish Evangelical Lutheran Mission Felm, Pro Ethical Trade Finland, The Trade Union Solidarity Centre of Finland SASK, Attac, Finn Church Aid, The Dalit Solidarity Network in Finland, Friends of the Earth Finland, KIOS Foundation and The Consumers’ Union of Finland. Layout: Petri Clusius/Amfi bi ky Publication date: October 2019 Cover photo: A worker on a tea plantation in the Nuwara Eliya district in Sri Lanka. The person in the photo is not connected to Finnwatch’s investigation. Finnwatch will not publish pictures of the individuals who were intervie- wed for this report due to consideration for their safety. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. INDIA: THE NILGIRIS .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights in Assam Tea Plantations: a Business and Human Rights Approach
    sustainability Article Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights in Assam Tea Plantations: A Business and Human Rights Approach Madhura Rao 1 and Nadia Bernaz 2,* 1 Food Claims Centre Venlo, Maastricht University, 5911 BV Venlo, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Law Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 July 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 9 September 2020 Abstract: This paper explores how UK-based companies deal with their responsibility to respect the human rights of Assam (India) tea plantation workers. Through qualitative content analysis of publicly available corporate reports and other documents, it investigates how companies approach and communicate their potential human rights impacts. It highlights the gap between well-documented human rights issues on the ground and corporate reports on these issues. It aims to answer the following research question: in a context where the existence of human rights violations at the end of the supply chain is well-documented, how do companies reconcile their possible connection with those violations and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights under the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights? This paper reveals the weakness of the current corporate social responsibility (CSR) approach from the perspective of rights-holders. It supports a business and human rights approach, one that places the protection of human rights at its core. Keywords: tea plantations; Assam; business and human rights; corporate social responsibility; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; UK Modern Slavery Act 1. Introduction This paper explores how UK-based tea companies deal with their responsibility to respect the human rights of Assam tea plantation workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Valuation a Case Study on Lindt & Sprüngli
    MAJEURE FINANCE Brand Valuation A case study on Lindt & Sprüngli Daniel Llobet & Alejo López-Balcells, supervised by Professor Patrick Legland June 2019 2 ABSTRACT Typically absent from financial statements, the brand of a company remains most times in the dark of finance. After all, it is the unconscious rationale behind consumers´ or employees´ choices for a product or a company, and how would you capitalize that? Some would say it is even esoteric. Nevertheless, its importance cannot be undermined. Brands are the most important individual asset of many companies and, as such, to know its value can be key for the company´s decision making. Built through years of investments in recognition, the brand is associated with certain product characteristics such as quality or price, but also eco- friendliness or fair trade. Perception, therefore, is key to understand its value. We have tried in this research paper to gather the predominant valuation methods in the industry, using them to value Lindt as brand. The broad range of results yielded by the different methods must not come as a surprise; as mentioned, the value is dependent on the evaluator´s perception of the brand. While some of the methods provide different solutions to try to objectivize this perception, this remains a subjective task after all. As a result, the main objective of this paper is to evaluate the relevance of each method, providing recommendations on the conditions to use one or the other. 3 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 THE IMPORTANCE OF BRAND VALUATION ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Guest Speaker: You've Probably Heard of The
    Creating commercial growth October - How Connected Living Can Create Brand Value You’ve probably heard of the Jawbone Up band. It measures your movement and helps you to monitor your fitness goals through an app. Do you know that you can link this to your Foursquare app? This means your Up band connects to restaurant menus to give you an overview Check out the August Smart Lock, Philips Hue, of what you’ve eaten. and Nest. These all exist … and more! There’s Do you know that you can then take a photo even a new service called “If This Then That,” of your meal and use Meal Snap to check the which allows you to build powerful connections healthiness based on colour and composition? between devices. For example, you can tell it, And that you can monitor your weight using the “If the sun is on my computer screen, Withings Scale, and track your BMI from your automatically adjust the blinds.” iPhone? Or that you can use Mother to remind you when to take your vitamins? Welcome to the world of connected living. Now, how can brands use this Now imagine a door lock that knows who to engage consumers? you are, lets you remotely programme entry for others, and even learns your behaviour to Read the Buzz evening highlights communicate with your home lights and a device that automatically reduces the temperature in All brands need their vision to be qualified your home when it knows you’re on your way and internally agreed upon before one back from the gym.
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Directory
    THE ROYAL WARRANT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION MEMBERS’ DIRECTORY 2018–2019 SECRETARY’S FOREWORD 3 WELCOME Dear Reader, The Royal Warrant Holders Association represents one of the most diverse groups of companies in the world in terms of size and sector, from traditional craftspeople to global multinationals operating at the cutting edge of technology. The Members’ Directory lists companies by broad categories that further underline the range of skills, products and services that exist within the membership. Also included is a section dedicated to our principal charitable arm, the Queen Elizabeth Scholarship Trust (QEST), of which HRH The Prince of Wales is Patron. The section profiles the most recent alumni of scholars and apprentices to have benefited from funding, who have each developed their skills and promoted excellence in British craftsmanship. As ever, Royal Warrant holders and QEST are united in our dedication to service, quality and excellence as symbolised by the Royal Warrant of Appointment. We hope you find this printed directory of use when thinking of manufacturers and suppliers of products and services. An online version – which is regularly updated with company information and has enhanced search facilities – can be viewed on our website, www.royalwarrant.org “UNITED IN OUR DEDICATION TO Richard Peck SERVICE, QUALITY CEO & Secretary AND EXCELLENCE” The Royal Warrant Holders Association CONTENTS Directory of members Agriculture & Animal Welfare ...............................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Brands March 2011
    Brand Finance® Global 500 The annual report on the world’s most valuable brands March 2011 Foreword Since it was first released in 2007, the BrandFinance® The value of the world’s top 500 brands continues Global 500 has been the most comprehensive table its impressive recovery from the drop in 2009 of US$707 billion. The value of the top 500 as a whole of published brand values. The study is released grew by 14% to US$3,306 billion. There are several annually and incorporates data from all listed interesting trends to draw out from this. companies globally. Each brand has been accorded a brand rating: a benchmarking study of the strength, The banking sector continues a steady drive towards risk and future potential of the brand relative to its rehabilitation in the eyes of consumers, having seen competitor set as well as a brand value: a summary the largest brand value increase of any sector - measure of the financial strength of the brand. US$90 billion. By contrast, the brands of sectors specialising in consumer goods have not fared so well. The brand value of Coca-Cola has fallen by US$9 billion, reflecting a drop in the beverage sector as a whole. Wal-mart, which has topped the BrandFinance® Global 500 for two years running, has this year fallen to third place. As well as highlighting the declining power of retail, the two companies which have overtaken it, Google and Microsoft, reflect the growing power of technology-led brands. These two companies, along with rival Apple, have all boosted their brand value by over US$8 billion while other technology and telecoms firms have also produced impressive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Valuation Model: a Shareholder Value Approach
    BRAND VALUATION MODEL: A SHAREHOLDER VALUE APPROACH A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University Graduate School of Management In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hyunjung Lee April, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation advisor, Dr. Michael Hu, and my committee members, Dr. Murali Shanker and Dr. Tuo Wang for their support and guidance and confidence in me. I would also like to thank Dr. Sungha Jang for his assistance with statistics and SAS programing. I am very grateful for the support from my friends and colleagues in the doctoral program. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my dear husband, Brian and beloved daughter, Sidney. Without a doubt, I would not be able to finish my dissertation without them and their support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1. Brand Value 1 Introduction 1 Literature Review 4 Brand and Brand Value 4 Brand Value Measure 5 Brand Value and Firm Value 21 Brand Value in M&A 23 Brand Valuation Model in M&A 24 Summary 25 Problem Statement 26 Purpose of Dissertation 27 Dissertation Outline 28 Chapter 2. Brand Value in Mergers & Acquisitions 29 Introduction 29 Brand Value Measures in M&A 30 The Acquirer Perspective 30 The Shareholder Perspective 31 Brand Valuation Models in M&A 33 Summary 35 iv Chapter 3. Methodology 36 Introduction 36 Sample 36 Data Source 39 Measures 40 Model Overview 43 Acquirer Perspective Brand Valuation Model 44 Shareholder Perspective Brand Valuation Model 46 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]