Paper 2020-04 Elliott Transatlantic.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paper 2020-04 Elliott Transatlantic.Pdf Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 ALCOCK & BROWN’S COMPETITORS Peter Elliott Curator Emeritus, Royal Air Force Museum ABSTRACT Alcock and Brown are rightly remembered as the first to make a non-stop flight across the Atlantic, but it is not generally appreciated that they were in competition with several other aviators. Some of them had tried and failed, while others had not completed their preparations before Alcock and Brown reached Ireland. This paper will set out the background to the competition and throw light on those who might have become as well-known as Alcock and Brown, had the circumstances changed. 1. Who might have been first across the Atlantic? In 2019 the centenary of the first non-stop crossings of the Atlantic was widely celebrated in the United Kingdom and Ireland, but little attention was paid to those who also set their sights on the distinction of being the first to make a transatlantic flight. It has been said that, if there had been a speck of dust in their carburettors, we would not have heard of John Alcock and Arthur W Brown; whilst their success was doubtless attributable to factors such as reliable engines, others were not so lucky. This paper will describe those who are seldom in the limelight, and who might easily have become as well-known as – if not better-known than – those pioneers. It sets out the background to the competition that motivated many aviators, describes the little-known plans for the delivery of Handley Page bombers by air from American factories and tells the stories of the “also-rans” whose bids to be first across the Atlantic came to naught. Conclusions regarding the competing aircraft are drawn. 2. The Competition Lord Northcliffe, owner of the Daily Mail, gave substantial prizes to help promote aviation and – indirectly – his newspaper. These were (with winners): • 1906 London to Manchester (Paulhan 1910) • 1908 Cross-Channel (Blériot 1909) • First circular flight of a mile or more by a British pilot in a British-built machine (Moore-Brabazon) • 1911 1,000-mile Circuit of Britain (Conneau) • 1912 1,000-mile Seaplane Circuit of Britain (not won) This paper is based on a presentation given to a RAeS Historical Group seminar on 3 June 2019 99 Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 In 1913 he announced a prize of £10,000 for the first transatlantic flight. Several people were reported to be making preparations, including Gordon England and Herr Rumpler, and a report in Flight implies that the Bleriot company and Colonel Samuel Cody were also intending to compete. The Belgian Charles Van den Born proposed flying from French Guinea to Brazil, but the competition rules effectively stipulated the North Atlantic.(1) Two firm entries were made, by Gustav Hamel (with a Martinsyde monoplane) and Lt J C Porte (Curtiss flying-boat).(2) Hamel was lost in the Channel in May 1914, and the war then intervened. 3. An Atlantic air bridge? After the US entered the war in 1917 the Standard Aircraft Corporation, located in New Jersey, USA, gained a contract to build 500 Handley Page O/400 bombers, which would be powered by Liberty engines in place of Rolls-Royce Eagles. In October 1917 Sir Frederick Handley Page proposed delivering the aircraft via Newfoundland to Ireland, pointing out the considerable morale effect that such a successful flight would have. “To Germany it would show that no point in that country was secure against Air raid and that the submarine no longer held the key of the transport problem. In this country it would enhance the prestige of the Air Service and increase the confidence of the British public.” He also pointed out that “the Italians planning a flight in the autumn with a Caproni machine. We can beat them if we start now”.(3) Standard also had a contract to build Caproni Ca 46s. The Air Board conducted a thorough investigation of the proposal, involving specialists in meteorology, navigation, aircraft performance, and compasses. The considered three possible routes: • Newfoundland – Cape Clear • St John’s – the Azores – Lisbon • Labrador – Greenland – Iceland – Scotland but their calculations indicated that the flight was at the edge of the O/400’s range.(4) In January 1918 reports were received that the US Government were “most anxious to fly their large machines straight across to France instead of by shipment, time and money being saved thereby.” The emphasis had shifted from national prestige to strategic advantage, although the air staff were keen to point out the need for special navigation techniques and instruments if the direct route was to be taken; they preferred going via the Azores. A minute on the file – the author’s name is illegible – states, “Personally I am of the opinion that if machines from America are to be delivered by air, we shall be lucky to get 20% of them across this way.” (5) In March 1918 Vickers sought permission to fly from New York to London in late July, with a Vimy, but the request was turned down by the Air Council. Lord Weir recommended that the decision be reconsidered in three months’ time. (6) 100 Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 Porte – by now a lieutenant colonel – submitted a paper in May 1918 proposing a flight “in conjunction with the United States Naval Authorities, so as to get their full co-operation and to prevent any jealousy or misunderstanding in the matter.” The aircraft, apparently a modified Felixstowe F.5 flying-boat, should be built in America and powered by Rolls-Royce engines. Porte was rather dismissive regarding landplanes. He felt that private manufacturers would use a transatlantic flight as “advertisement, with its scientific side a very bad second” whereas a national (i.e. service) flight “would be solely for the collection of sufficient data to … show others how to follow after, allowing aircraft to be delivered by air.(7) He pointed out that using a landplane would require the construction of aerodromes in the Azores and that a seaplane would be more likely to survive ditching. Porte had planned to use this route when he entered the competition in 1914. A paper by Lt Col R C M Pink (later of Pink’s War fame) considered a flight by RAF flying-boats via the Azores, noted the US Navy’s preparations and warned that Porte’s proposed flight would “risk the crews of the boats on far too slender a chance”. He contended that it was better not to attempt the flight at all rather than to throw away useful lives on an ill-considered scheme, but tempered this by asking “Is it or is it not worthwhile that the first aircraft to cross the Atlantic shall be built, designed and manned by the British?” (8) Stirring stuff! The Royal Navy were apparently unwilling to provide ships to support the flight. The Air Council included transatlantic flights (whether by landplane or flying-boat) in a proposed programme of demonstration flights discussed at a meeting in December 1918.(9) In Newfoundland, an RAF officer had identified a site for an airfield. A lease was taken out on land at Mount Pearl in the summer of 1918, but the ground had to be cleared and levelled, at significant cost – not least because the landowner was proving difficult, claiming compensation for (10 ) the destruction of a rhubarb patch! The Air Ministry informed the Society of British Aircraft Constructors in April 1919 that the site was available for use albeit requiring further improvement and noted that firms were “making their own arrangements for aerodrome accommodation”.(11) 4. Competition renewed In February 1919 the Royal Aero Club reissued the rules for the Daily Mail prize: • The flight must be in an aeroplane, rather than an airship or balloon • It could be made from any point in Great Britain or Ireland to any point in Newfoundland, Canada or the USA, or vice versa. Newfoundland was not part of Canada at the time – it was a separate Dominion until 1949. • The competition was open to persons of any nationality not of enemy origin, and no aeroplane of enemy origin or manufacture could be used – the war was, technically, not over until the Treaty of Versailles was signed four months later on 28 June 1919. • There was a limit of 72 consecutive hours for the flight. • Competitors were allowed only one aircraft per attempt – no changing horses in mid- stream – but 101 Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 • An intermediate stop or stops on water would be allowed without penalty. (12) It seems that 11 contenders declared their intention to try for the prize: six of them didn’t make it to the starting line. Table 1: entrants who did not compete Pilot & Crew Aircraft Capt Sundstedt & Maj. Morgan Sundstedt Sunrise (seaplane) Kennedy-Dawson (Modified Mr Dawson Sikorsky) S Pickles & Capt A G D West Fairey Atlantic (modified IIIC) Capt A Payze + 2 Whitehead biplane J A Peters & Capt W R Curtis Alliance Seabird Maj Savory, Capt Woolner & Boulton & Paul P.8 A L Howarth Sundstedt was originally Swedish but was applying for American citizenship. His seaplane had a wingspan of 100 ft, with two engines driving pusher propellers and was built in New Jersey. Unfortunately, it crashed on a test flight. Mr Dawson’s aircraft seems not to have been built. Designed by C J H M Kennedy, who had worked with Sikorsky, it would have had a span of 108 feet and been powered by four Napier Lion engines.(13) Little information is available regarding two of the competitors.
Recommended publications
  • SWOT Analysis
    WESTJET&PRODUCT&STRATEGY! TEAM%B:%BRAZEN%BILLIONAIRES% ALEX%GREENE% ANDREW%BARR% BRIAN%TANG% MKTG%1102%–%SET%1F% ELYSIA%LAM% ANNE%MARIE%WEBB=HUGHES% MALISHA%VIRK% 10/16/2014% PAIGE%APPENHIEMER% ! Table of Contents Introduction*............................................................................................................................................*1* Marketing*Challenge*............................................................................................................................*1* Key*Findings*...........................................................................................................................................*1* Current*State*.....................................................................................................................................................*1! Sustainability*(CSR)*........................................................................................................................................*1! Market*Trends*..................................................................................................................................................*2! Shares/Stocks*...................................................................................................................................................*2! Unique*Selling*Proposition*..........................................................................................................................*2! Awards*................................................................................................................................................................*3!
    [Show full text]
  • The Felixstowe Flying-Boats
    842 FLIGHT, 2 December 1955 The Porte Baby prototype No. 9800 in A its original form; later the bow section was lengthened. HISTORIC MILITARY AIRCRAFT Noll Part I By J. M. BRUCE, M.A. THE FELIXSTOWE FLYING-BOATS N 1909 a young British Naval officer named John Cyril Porte WITH this article on a famous family of flying-boats—about which made his first practical entry into the field of aviation by little detailed information has ever before appeared in print—Mr. Brace building a small glider which, in company with Lt. W. B. resumes his popular series. He wishes to make grateful acknowledgement I to Mr. Bruce Robertson, who has provided, together with certain other Pirie, R.N., he attempted to fly at Portsdown Hill, Portsmouth. information, the data on serial numbers which will be published with By the summer of 1910 Porte was experimenting with a little the final instalment of this article. monoplane of the Santos Dumont Demoiselle type, powered by a 35 h.p. Dutheil-Chalmers engine. At that time he was stationed at the Submarine Depot, Portsmouth, and his monoplane's trials several years. In that year he also made a three-wheeled road were conducted at Fort Grange. vehicle propelled by a crude airscrew which was driven by a small By the following year Po«e had fallen victim to pulmonary engine of his own design. tuberculosis, and his Naval career was apparently prematurely Curtiss had enjoyed a considerable amount of success with his terminated when he was invalided out of the Service. Despite his lightweight engines, a fact which had not escaped the attention of severe disability (for which medical science could at that time do the well-known American balloonist Thomas Scott Baldwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY
    Episode 6, NC-4: First Across the Atlantic, Pensacola, Florida and Hammondsport, NY Elyse Luray: Our first story examines a swatch of fabric which may be from one of history’s most forgotten milestones: the world's first transatlantic flight. May 17th, 1919. The Portuguese Azores. Men in whaling ships watched the sea for their prey, harpoons at the ready. But on this morning, they make an unexpected and otherworldly sighting. A huge gray flying machine emerges from the fog, making a roar unlike anything they have ever heard before. Six American airmen ride 20,000 pounds of wood, metal, fabric and fuel, and plunge gently into the bay, ending the flight of the NC-4. It was journey many had thought impossible. For the first time, men had flown from America to Europe, crossing the vast Atlantic Ocean. But strangely, while their voyage was eight years before Charles Lindbergh's flight, few Americans have ever heard of the NC-4. Almost 90 years later, a woman from Saratoga, California, has an unusual family heirloom that she believes was a part of this milestone in aviation history. I'm Elyse Luray and I’m on my way to meet Shelly and hear her story. Hi. Shelly: Hi Elyse. Elyse: Nice to meet you. Shelly: Come on in. Elyse: So is this something that has always been in your family? Shelly: Yeah. It was passed down from my grandparents. Here it is. Elyse: Okay. So this is the fabric. Wow! It's in wonderful condition. Shelly: Yeah, it's been in the envelope for years and years.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014 Irene Kwan and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D
    NOVEMBER 2015 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 IRENE KWAN AND DANIEL RUTHERFORD, PH.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Anastasia Kharina, Xiaoli Mao, Guozhen Li, Bill Hem- mings, Vera Pardee, Benjamin Jullien, Tim Johnson, and Dimitri Simos for their review of this document and overall support for the project. We would also like to thank Professor Bo Zou (University of Illinois at Chicago) for his contribution to statistical analyses included in the report. This study was funded through the generous support of the Oak and ClimateWorks Foundations. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005 USA communications@theicct.org | www.theicct.org © 2015 International Council on Clean Transportation TaBLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Fuel burn modeling .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Developments in Commercial Flight
    LESSON 3 Early Developments in Commercial Flight HARLES A. LINDBERGH was one of many Quick Write young men and women learning to fl y C in 1922. He toured as a wing walker and parachutist in a barnstorming act, and then as a pilot. He joined the Charles Lindbergh did not have modern navigation Army in 1924 and graduated fi rst in his fl ying class equipment or another in 1925, but did not receive a regular commission. pilot when he made his He joined the Army Reserve and returned to civilian famous New York-to-Paris fl ight. After reading the life. He then spent a year as a pilot for the new story about his fl ight across airmail service. the Atlantic Ocean, name three things that make In September 1926 he decided to try to fl y across this solo fl ight a historical the Atlantic. He had his eye on the Orteig prize— accomplishment. $25,000 for the fi rst pilot to fl y solo nonstop from New York City to Paris, France. Lindbergh knew that other pilots were after the same prize, so he moved fast. He had $2,000 of his own Learn About savings, plus $13,000 he’d collected from businessmen • why Charles Lindbergh’s in St. Louis. He struck a deal with Ryan Aircraft Inc. contribution to aviation to build him a plane. He wanted a high-wing became famous monoplane with a single air-cooled 220-horsepower • the signifi cance of Wright Whirlwind engine. Amelia Earhart’s transatlantic fl ights Just 60 days after the contract was signed, Ryan • how early developments delivered the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The First of the Great Flying Boats
    America The first of the great flying boats BY JIM POEL AND LEE SACKETT America’s History would be up to the task. tiss had built. It also incorporated In 1914 Rodman Wannamaker To celebrate 100 years of peace many design features that stayed (of the department store fame) con- between the United States and in use throughout flying-boat pro- tracted Glenn Curtiss to build an England, in 1913 The London Daily duction in the coming years. The aircraft that was capable of flying Mail newspaper offered a prize of innovations included the stepped across the Atlantic Ocean. Not even $50,000 for the first aerial crossing hull, step vents, wing floats, spon- a decade had passed since Glenn of the Atlantic between the two sons, provisions for in-flight main- Curtiss and the Aerial Experiment countries. To further commemo- tenance, an enclosed cockpit, and Association (AEA) had flown the rate the strong bonds between even provisions for an in-cabin June Bug near Hammondsport, New England and the United States, mattress that would allow a crew- York. Aviation had made amazing there was to be both a British and member to rest. strides in the six years since the an American pilot. The aircraft was powered by two flight of the June Bug, but Wan- It only took 90 days to turn out 90-hp V-8 OX-5 engines and was namaker’s proposed flight seemed the Curtiss model H America, the designed to cruise at 55 to 60 mph. more “Jules Verne” than practi- world’s first multi-engine flying The instrument panel consisted of a cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014
    FACT SHEET: U.S. AND EUROPE NOVEMBER 2015 communications@theicct.org WWW.THEICCT.ORG TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 A new report by the International Council on Clean Transportation compares the top 20 airlines on transatlantic routes in terms of fuel efficiency (i.e., carbon intensity) in 2014. ICELAND KEF FINLAND 5 SWEDEN 1 9 NORWAY LABRADOR OSL SEA 14 ESTONIA DENMARK NORTH A 8 E LATVIA SEA S UNITED SVO 2 IC KINGDOM CPH LT LITHUANIA 6 BA 2 17 RUSSIA 16 19 2 NETHERLANDS BELARUS DUB AMS 12 POLAND 19 LHR GERMANY 17 IRELAND BELGIUM DUS FRA CZECH REP. UKRAINE CDG SLOVAKIA CANADA 14 FRANCE ZRH HUNGARY AUSTRIA MOLDOVA SWITZ. 12 ROMANIA 9 YYZ 9 ITALY BLACK SEA ORD DTW BOS 6 GEORGIA FCO IST EWR JFK MAD ARMENIA PORTUGAL TURKEY SPAIN GREECE UNITED STATES CYPRUS MALTA SYRIA CLT TUNISIA IRAQ LEBANON NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN MEDITERRANEAN SEA MOROCCO WEST BANK ISRAEL JORDAN KUWA kg CO2 per ALGERIA kg CO2 per SAUDI ARABIA R E Rank Airline Airport pair pax-km/L round-trip itinerary Rank WESTERNAirline Airport pair pax-km/LLIBYAround-trip itinerary D EGYPT S SAHARA E A 1 JFK & OSL 42 720 9 CDG & JFK 32 930 CUBA & & 2 DOMINICAN DUS JFK 36 840 12 FCO JFK 31 1100 HAITI REP. MAURITANIA MALI JAMAICA NIGER EMALA BELIZE 2 AMS & JFK 36 830 12 JFK & ZRH 31 1000 CHAD ERITREA HONDURAS CAPE VERDE CARIBBEAN SEA & 36 720 SENEGAL & EL SALVADOR NICARAGUA 2 DUB JFK 14GAMBIA BURKINCLTA FRA 30 1200 SUDAN DJIBOUTI GUINEA-BISSAU GUINEA NIGERIA & &BENI N COSTA RICA 5 JFK SVO 35 1100 14 CPH EWR 30 1000 CÔTE GHANA VENEZUELA D'IVOIRE PANAMA TOGO CENTRAL SIERRA LEONE AFRICAN REPUBLIC ETHIOPIA 6 ISTGUYANA & JFK 34 1200 16 LHR & ORD CAMEROON29 1100 FRENCH GUIANA LIBERIA SURINAME COLOMBIA & & 6 AMS DTW 34 1000 17 JFK LHR 28 1000 UGANDA SÃO TOMÉ AND PRINCIPE EQUAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Current Strength and Weaknesses of Existing Seaplane/ Amphibian Transport System As Well As Future Opportunities
    Future Seaplane Transport System - SWOT Report on current strength and weaknesses of existing seaplane/ amphibian transport system as well as future opportunities Authors Giangi Gobbi, Ladislav Smrcek, Roderick Galbraith University of Glasgow Benedikt Mohr, Joachim Schömann, Institute of Aerospace Systems Technische Universität München Glasgow, UK Garching, Germany Keeper of Document Author or Coauthor Work Package(s) WP4 Status Draft Identification Programme, Project ID FP7-AAT-2007-RTD1 Project Title: FUture SEaplane TRAffic (FUSETRA) Version: 1.1 File name: FUSETRA_D41_SWOT_v01.doc FUSETRA – Future Seaplane Traffic 1 Version 1.0 Future Seaplane Transport System - SWOT 27.06.2011 Aerospace Engineering Glasgow University James Watt South Building Glasgow G12 8QQ UK Author: Giangi Gobbi Phone: +44.(0)141.330.7268 Fax: +44.(0)141.330.4885 ggobbi@aero.gla.ac.uk www.fusetra.eu FUSETRA – Future Seaplane Traffic 2 Version 1.0 Future Seaplane Transport System - SWOT Control Page This version supersedes all previous versions of this document. Version Date Author(s) Pages Reason 1.0 27/6/2011 Giangi Gobbi 46 Initial write/editing FUSETRA – Future Seaplane Traffic 3 Version 1.0 Future Seaplane Transport System - SWOT Contents List of tables ............................................................................................................... 6 List of figures .............................................................................................................. 6 Glossary ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport
    The History of Air Transport KOSTAS IATROU Dedicated to my wife Evgenia and my sons George and Yianni Copyright © 2020: Kostas Iatrou First Edition: July 2020 Published by: Hermes – Air Transport Organisation Graphic Design – Layout: Sophia Darviris Material (either in whole or in part) from this publication may not be published, photocopied, rewritten, transferred through any electronical or other means, without prior permission by the publisher. Preface ommercial aviation recently celebrated its first centennial. Over the more than 100 years since the first Ctake off, aviation has witnessed challenges and changes that have made it a critical component of mod- ern societies. Most importantly, air transport brings humans closer together, promoting peace and harmo- ny through connectivity and social exchange. A key role for Hermes Air Transport Organisation is to contribute to the development, progress and promo- tion of air transport at the global level. This would not be possible without knowing the history and evolu- tion of the industry. Once a luxury service, affordable to only a few, aviation has evolved to become accessible to billions of peo- ple. But how did this evolution occur? This book provides an updated timeline of the key moments of air transport. It is based on the first aviation history book Hermes published in 2014 in partnership with ICAO, ACI, CANSO & IATA. I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Martin Dresner, Chair of the Hermes Report Committee, for his important role in editing the contents of the book. I would also like to thank Hermes members and partners who have helped to make Hermes a key organisa- tion in the air transport field.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 No 212 Nov 2016
    No 212 Nov 2016 1 www.sihg.org.uk 200 Years of Steam Locomotives Class 25 condensing locomotive of South African Railways, see page 10 Whittle and the Jet Engine - Alternative Perspectives Fig. 4 RR Derwent engine, see page 6 Newsletter 212 November 2016 2 Contents 2 Surrey Industrial History Group Officers 3 SIHG Leatherhead Meeetings 4 Venues, Times & Contacts 5 Whitgift Schoolboys’ and others’ visits to the Chipstead Valley Railway and the Kingswood tunnel under construction (part 2) by Paul W. Sowan 6 Whittle and the Jet Engine - Alternative Perspectives by Alan Thomas 7 New Online Guide to Dennis Bros Ltd by Surrey History Centre 9 & 11 Two Brewery Books 10 200 Years of Steam Locomotives by Peter Bosomworth report by Allan Wheeler 12 Diary November & December 2016 & January 2017 13 Re-Engineering Brooklands ENGINEERING SEASON AT THE V&A until 6 November 2016 www.vam.ac.uk/ (click <What’s On>) Victoria and Albert Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 2RL The Engineering Season at the V&A celebrates the 'unsung heroes' of design that create and shape the built world. The exciting line-up includes a major retrospective of the engineering legend Ove Arup, a display highlighting the global impact of contemporary British engineers, a garden pavilion woven by a robot, and a packed events programme exploring some of the most advanced engineering taking place in the world today. New pattern of publication for the Surrey Industrial History Group Newsletter. The Newsletter is now issued quarterly, covering: February, March & April May, June & July August, September & October November, December & January Many thanks to all who have sent in contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklands Aerodrome & Motor
    BROOKLANDS AERODROME & MOTOR RACING CIRCUIT TIMELINE OF HERITAGE ASSETS Brooklands Heritage Partnership CONSULTATION COPY (June 2017) Radley House Partnership BROOKLANDS AERODROME & MOTOR RACING CIRCUIT TIMELINE OF HERITAGE ASSETS CONTENTS Aerodrome Road 2 The 1907 BARC Clubhouse 8 Bellman Hangar 22 The Brooklands Memorial (1957) 33 Brooklands Motoring History 36 Byfleet Banking 41 The Campbell Road Circuit (1937) 46 Extreme Weather 50 The Finishing Straight 54 Fuel Facilities 65 Members’ Hill, Test Hill & Restaurant Buildings 69 Members’ Hill Grandstands 77 The Railway Straight Hangar 79 The Stratosphere Chamber & Supersonic Wind Tunnel 82 Vickers Aviation Ltd 86 Cover Photographs: Aerial photographs over Brooklands (16 July 2014) © reproduced courtesy of Ian Haskell Brooklands Heritage Partnership CONSULTATION COPY Radley House Partnership Timelines: June 2017 Page 1 of 93 ‘AERODROME ROAD’ AT BROOKLANDS, SURREY 1904: Britain’s first tarmacadam road constructed (location?) – recorded by TRL Ltd’s Library (ref. Francis, 2001/2). June 1907: Brooklands Motor Circuit completed for Hugh & Ethel Locke King and first opened; construction work included diverting the River Wey in two places. Although the secondary use of the site as an aerodrome was not yet anticipated, the Brooklands Automobile Racing Club soon encouraged flying there by offering a £2,500 prize for the first powered flight around the Circuit by the end of 1907! February 1908: Colonel Lindsay Lloyd (Brooklands’ new Clerk of the Course) elected a member of the Aero Club of Great Britain. 29/06/1908: First known air photos of Brooklands taken from a hot air balloon – no sign of any existing route along the future Aerodrome Road (A/R) and the River Wey still meandered across the road’s future path although a footbridge(?) carried a rough track to Hollicks Farm (ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Material Agenda Supplement for Licensing Sub-Committee, 28/06
    LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE 28 JUNE 2016 LATE MATERIAL Double Tree by Hilton, 1 Skerne Road, Kingston upon Thames KT2 5FL - Appendix A The following material has been received since the publication of the agenda for this meeting: Submission from applicant Positioning Document from applicant Dispersal Policy from applicant Conditions agreed with RBK Trading Standards IN THE MATTER OF: A PROPOSED HOTEL DOUBLE TREE BY HILTON AT 1 SKERNE ROAD, KINGSTON UPON THAMES HEARING: 28TH JUNE 2016 SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF REQ OPCO (KINGSTON) LTD APPLICANT WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT 1. This is an application for the grant of a Premises Licence pursuant to Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 for a new Hotel to be known as Double Tree by Hilton and it is proposed to have 146 guest bedrooms. Planning Permission was granted in 2008 for the Hotel including “conference banqueting and meeting rooms” as part of a major redevelopment of the area. 2. The proposed site is to operate as a full service Hotel managed by Interstate Hotels and Resorts Europe (the largest hotel management globally managing over 500 hotels and resorts). It is proposed that the Hotel will form part of the world wide Hilton organisation. Hilton is one of the largest Hotel operators in the world. There are currently 450 Double Tree by Hilton Hotels. There are approximately 30 Hotels across England, Wales and Scotland. At the present time, the closest Doubletree by Hiltons geographically to Kingston upon Thames are in Chelsea and Heathrow Airport. The development therefore proposes the introduction of this major and internationally known Hotel brand to Kingston upon Thames.
    [Show full text]