DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of the Mosses of the Intermountain West, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of the Mosses of the Intermountain West, USA Great Basin Naturalist Volume 48 Number 3 Article 14 7-31-1988 Checklist of the mosses of the Intermountain West, USA John R. Spence University of Colorado, Nederland, Colorado Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Spence, John R. (1988) "Checklist of the mosses of the Intermountain West, USA," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 48 : No. 3 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol48/iss3/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CHECKLIST OF THE MOSSES OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST, USA John R. Spence' Abstract —A revised list of the mosses of the Intermountain West, including all of Utah and Nevada and parts of surrounding states, is presented. Recorded are 342 species in 122 genera and 39 families in this region. Nomenclatural and taxonomic changes as well as floristic additions since the publication of Seville Flowers s book are included. In a recent survey of the floristic literature Wasatch Plateau. Recent work on the vascular of North America, Schofield and Miller (1982) flora provides support for the integrity of this indicated the following regions as being the region (McLaughlin 1986). Two small, dis- least known bryologically: the Southwest, parate elements are included: Uinta Moun- Rocky Mountains, Great Plains, and Arctic tains and a small portion of the Mojave Desert and boreal North America. Although not in southwestern Utah and southern Nevada. specifically indicated, the Intermountain Re- The inclusion of the Mojave Desert portions gion of the western United States, consisting of Utah and Nevada provides essentially com- primarily of Utah and Nevada, is part of both plete floras for these states, and adds only a the Southwest and the Rocky Mountain re- few Mojavean taxa, e.g., Entostodon holan- gions. deri, Jaffueliobryiim wrightii, Pleurochaete This paper begins a series on the bryophyte sqiiarrosa, and Splachnobnjum ohtusum. flora of the Intermountain West (sensu Cron- The bryophyte flora of the region has been quist et al. 1972), which includes the states of summarized by Lawton (1958, 1971), Clark Utah and Nevada as well as portions of Ore- (1957), Haring (1961), and Flowers (1961, gon, Idaho, Wyoming, and Arizona. The 1973). A wide variety of shorter reports (see boundaries are similar to those used in the below) also exists, while Behle (1984) lists Intermountain Flora Project (Cronquist et al. Flowers s many papers. As yet no attempt has 1972 and subsequent volumes) and largely for been made to compile a bryophyte flora for the same reasons. The main difference is that I the Intermountain West, as is being done for have included all of Nevada and the Colorado the vascular plants (Cronquist et al. 1972 and Plateau portion of northern Arizona (Fig. 1). subse(juent volumes). This region is almost identical to the Great Although state checklists that include por- Basin Province of Gleason and Cronquist tions of the Intermountain West (e.g., Mc- (1964). Western Colorado is floristically simi- Cleary and Green 1971) exist, this paper is the lar to eastern Utah (Weber 1973), with the first to bring together information on the floristic change to the southern Rocky Moun- mosses of the entire area as a checklist. Future tains almost impossible to delimit. Hence an work will include the hepatics. The main aims indefinite fringe of eastern Colorado and adja- of this paper are to provide a list and to update cent New Mexico is included. classification and nomenclatiue of species. The Intermountain West is highly diverse Major sources for the list include: Utah (Flow- in landforms, geology, climate, and vegeta- ers 1973), Nevada (Lawton 1958, 1971, Lavin tion. In the south is found the hot and arid 1981, 1982), and Arizona (Haring 1961, John- Mojave Desert, while northward stretch son and Vitt 1971, Vitt et al. 1971). Included semiarid shrub steppe, pygmy conifer wood- in these papers are many additional refer- lands, montane forests, and alpine tundra. ences. Many additional species probably Four natural physiographic provinces com- remain to be discovered, especially in the prise the Intermountain West: Snake River Pottiaceae (cf Spence 1987). Some areas, es- Plain, Great Basin, Colorado Plateau, and pecially southeastern Oregon, the Colorado Mountain Research .Station, University of Colorado. Nedcrland, Colorado S()4fi(i Present address: Dei)artnient of Plant aiid Microbial Sciences. Universit>' of Canterbury, Christchurch 1, New Zealand. 394 July 1988 Spence: Checklistof Mosses 395 Ambystegiaceae in part (Kanda 1975, 1976), Grimmiaceae (Churchill 1981), Mniaceae (Koponen 1968, 1973), Polytrichaceae (Smith 1971), Plagiotheciaceae (Buck and Ireland 1985), and Scouleriaceae (Churchill 1985). Genera are arranged alphabetically, with family position given in parentheses. Taxo- nomic categories below the rank of species are not listed. The bibliographic sources are des- ignated by numbers after each name. For some species ofBryum, specimens from UBC are used for documentation. More details on Bryum can be found in Spence (1988). Abietinella C. Muell. (Thuidiaceae) A. abietina (Hedw.) Fleisch., 15, 17. Aloina Kindb. (Pottiaceae) A. bifronsiDe Not.) Delg., 13, 15. Amblijstegium B.S.G. (Amblystegiaceae) A.^urtaft/f (Hedw.)B,S.G., 15, 17. A. rtparium (Hedw.) B.S.G., 15, 17. A. sfrpens (Hedw.) B.S.G. , 15, 17,29. A. f^na.r(Hedw.)C. Jens., 15, 17, 29. A. trichopodium (Schultz) Hartm. (Corley et al. 1981 suggest that the correct name is A. humile), 15, 17, 29. A. tiflrium (Hedw.) Lindb., 15, 17. Amphidium Schimp. (Rhabdoweisiaceae) Fig. 1. The approximate boundaries of the study area A. lapponicum (Hedw.) Schimp., 15, 29. are outUned in black. Included are all of Utah and Ne- AnacoUa Schimp. (Bartramiaceae) vada, northern Arizona to the Mogollon Rim, and parts of A. menziesii (Turn.) Par., 15, 27. Oregon, Idaho, and Wyoming. Andreaea Hedw. (Andreaeaceae) A. rupestris Hedw., 17. Anomodon Hook. &Tayl. (Anomodontaceae) Plateau, and the Uinta Mountains, are still A. attemtatiis (Hedw.) Hueb., 17. poorly known. A. rosfrafws (Hedw.) Schimp., 17. Recent monographs have drastically Antitrichia Brid. (Leucodontaceae) A. californica SuU. ex Lesq., 29. changed the taxonomy and nomenclature of Atrichum P. Beauv. (Polytrichaceae) many groups. I have followed the opinions A. sehvijnii Aust., 15. of workers who have specialized in particular A. undulatinn (Hedw.) P. Beauv., 17. groups: Aloina (Delgadillo 1975), Amblyste- Aidacomnium Schwaegr. (Aulacomniaceae) A. androgynum (Hedw.) Schwaegr., 29. gium (Crum and Anderson 1981), Barbida 15, A. pahistre (Hedw.) Schwaegr., 15, 17, 29. (Zander 1979), Bryiim (Spence 1988), Cros- Barbida Hedw. (Pottiaceae) sidium (Delgadillo 1975), Dicranum (Peter- B. convohita Hedw., 15. son 1979), Didymodon (Zander 1978), Enca- B. ehrenbergii (Lor.) F\eisch., 15, 17. lypta (Horton 1983), Hygrohypnum (Jamie- B. eiistegia Cdrd. & Ther. , 15. B. indica (Hook.) Spreng. , 15, 49. son 1976), LeskeeUa and Pseudoleskeella B. unguiculata Hedw., 15, 17. (Lewinsky 1974), Orthodicranum (Peterson Bartramia Hedw. (Bartramiaceae) 1979), Orthotrichum (Vitt 1973), Pohlia (Shaw B. ithyphyUa Brid., 15,27. 1982), Pseudocrossidium (Zander 1979), Brachythecium B.S.G. (Brachytheciaceae) B. flCKminflfum (Hedw.) Aust., 17. Schistiditim (Bremer 1980a, 1980b, 1981), B. fl/fcicans (Hedw.) B.S.G., 15. and Weissia (Stoneburner 1985). B. asperrimum (Mitt.) Sull., 15, 17. At the family level I have used the classifica- B. campe.streiC. Muell.) B.S.G., 15. tion of Vitt (1984) and Buck and Vitt (1986), B. co//tm«n (Schleich. exC. Muell.) B.S.G., 15, 17, 29. except for the Leskeaceae and Thuidiaceae, B. delicatidtim Flow., 15. B. digastrum C. Muell. & Kindb. ex Macoun & where I have used the traditional generic Kindb., 15. concepts (Spence unpublished manuscript). B. erythrorrhizon B.S.G., 15, 17. For other families the following are used: B.fendleri (Sull.) Jaeg. & Sauerb., 15, 29. 396 Great Basin Naturalist Vol. 48, No. 3 B.frigidumiC. Muell.) Besch., 15, 17, 29. C. decipiens (De Not.) Loeske, 15. B. leibergii Grout, 29. C.fUicinum (Hedw.) Spruce, 15, 17, 29. B. nelsonii Grout, 1.5, 17, 29. Crossidiiim ]ur. (Pottiaceae) B. oxycladon (Brid.) ]aeg. &Sauerb., 15. C. aberrans Holz. & Bartr., 13, 15, 17, 27. 17. B. plumosum (Hedw .) B.S.G., 17. C. cra.s.sJncrie(DeNot.)Jur., 13, 15, B. rivulare B.S.G., 15, 17,29. C. squamiferum (Vir.) ]\iT. , 13, 15. B. rutahulum {Hedw.)B.S.G., 29. Crumia Schof. (Pottiaceae) B. salebrosum (Web. & Mohr) B.S.G., 15, 17. C. latifolia (Kindb.) Schof., 15, 29. B. sfar)cd(Brid.)B.S.G., 15. Desmatodon Brid. (Pottiaceae) B. velutimim {Hedw.)B.S.G., 17. D. cernw«.s (Hueb. ) B. & S., 15, 17, 29. Bryoerythrophylhnn Chen (Pottiaceae) D. conDo/ufu.s (Brid.) Grout, 15, 17. B. recurvirostrum (Hedw.) Chen, 15, 17, 29. D. glacialis Funck ex Brid., 15, 29. Bryohaplocladiuin Wats. & Iwat. (Thuidiaceae) D. /aft/o/n«(Hedw.) Brid., 15, 29. B. microphylhim (Hedw.) Wats. & Iwat., 17. D. laureriiK.F. Schultz) B. &S., 15. Bryoxiphium Mitt. (Brvoxiphiaceae) D. oi>/n.si/o/iu.s' (Schwaegr.) Schimp., 15, 17. B. norvegicum (Erid.) Mitt., .3.5. D. plinthobius Sull. & Lesq. ex Sull., 15. Brtjum Hedw. (Bryaceae) Dichelyrna Myr. (Fontinalaceae) B. algovicum Sendin. exC. Muell., 15, 29. D. falcatum (Hedw.) Myr., 15. B. ambhjodonC. Muell., 15, 29. Dichodontitnn Schimp. (Dicranaceae) B. arcticuvi (R. Brown) B.S.G., 15. D. pellucidum (Hedw.) Schimp., 15. B. argenteum Hedw., 15, 17, 29. Dicranella (C. Muell.) Schimp. (Dicranaceae) B. caespiticium Hedw., 15, 17, 29. D. schreberiana (Hedw.) Dix., 15. B. capillare Hedw., 15, 17, 29. Dicranodontitim B.S.G. (Dicranaceae) B. cyclophyUum (Schwaegr.) B. & S., 15, 17. D. denudatum (Britt.) Britt., 17. B. dichotomtim Dicks., 15. Dicranoweisia Lindb. ex Milde (Dicranaceae) B.flaccidum Brid, 41, UBC! D. cirrhata (Hedw.) Lindb.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVANCHERIA Mémoire De L’Herbier Louis-Marie No 30
    PROVANCHERIA Mémoire de l’Herbier Louis-Marie No 30 CATALOGUE DES BRYOPHYTES DU QUÉBEC ET DU LABRADOR Jean Faubert 2007 PROVANCHERIA Mémoire de l’Herbier Louis-Marie Université Laval ISSN 0556-2015 Rédacteur Serge PAYETTE, Conservateur de l’Herbier Louis-Marie Courriel : [email protected] Secrétaire de rédaction Sylvie M. FISET, Herbier Louis-Marie Courriel : [email protected] Téléphone : 418.656.2544 Télécopieur : 418.656.7176 Adresse Herbier Louis-Marie, Pavillon C.-E.-Marchand, 1030 av. de la Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, G1V OA6 Provancheria, créé en 1966 et dédié à la mémoire de l’Abbé Léon Provancher (1820- 1892), est une série de mémoires paraissant irrégulièrement et consacrés principalement à la floristique, la phytogéographie et la systématique des végétaux. Cette série de mémoires a pour but de permettre la publication de travaux floristiques sur l’est et le nord du Canada, notamment ceux consacrés aux flores régionales dont l’ampleur empêche leur parution dans les périodiques courants. Provancheria veut ainsi mettre à la disposition des phytogéographes et des taxonomistes intéressés à la flore canadienne des données qui autrement devraient rester inédites. Provancheria est principalement distribué en échange de publications similaires. Il est toutefois possible de se procurer les numéros déjà parus dont la liste apparaît à la fin de ce numéro, en s’adressant à la secrétaire de rédaction ou sur le site Web de l’herbier à l’adresse www.herbier.ulaval.ca Dépôt légal : 2007. Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, Bibliothèque nationale du Canada. Le dessin de la page couverture représente Metzgeria furcata, il a été réalisé par Audrey Lachance.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic and Morphological Notes on Uleobryum Naganoi Kiguchi Et Ale (Pottiaceae, Musci) 1
    HikobiaHikobial4：１４３－１４７．２００４ 14: 143-147.2004 PhylogeneticPhylO窪eneticandmorphOlO=icalmtesⅢＩノルＣＤ〃"剛〃昭肌oiKiguchi and morphological notes on Uleobryum naganoi Kiguchi eteraL(POttiaceae,Musci)’ ale (Pottiaceae, Musci) 1 HIROYUKIHIRoYuKISATQHⅡRoMITsuBoTA,ToMIoYAMAGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucH１ SATO, HIROMI TSUBOTA, TOMIO YAMAGUCHI AND HIRONORI DEGUCHI SATO,SATO,Ｈ､,TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,YAMAGucHI,Ｔ､＆DEGucHI,H2004Phylogeneticandmor- H., TSUBOTA, H., YAMAGUCHI, T. & DEGUCHI, H. 2004. Phylogenetic and mor­ phologicalphologicalnotesonU/eo6Mｲﾉ'z〃αgα"ojKiguchietα/､(Pottiaceae,Musci）Hikobia notes on Uleobryum naganoi Kiguchi et al. (Pottiaceae, Musci). Hikobia 14:l4：１４３－１４７． 143-147. UleobryumＵ/eo6/Ｗｍ〃αgα"ojKiguchiejα/､,endemictoJapanwithalimitednumberofknown naganoi Kiguchi et aI., endemic to Japan with a limited number of known locations,locations,isnewlyreportedffomShikoku,westernJapanThroughcarefUlexamina- is newly reported from Shikoku, western Japan. Through careful examina­ tionoffTeshmaterial,rhizoidalmberfbnnationisconfinnedfbrthefirsttime・The ， tion of fresh material, rhizoidal tuber formation is confirmed for the first time. The phylogeneticphylogeneticpositionofthiscleistocalpousmossisalsoassesseｄｏｎｔｈｅｂａｓｉｓｏｆｍaxi- position of this cleistocarpous moss is also assessed on the basis of maxi­ mummumlikelihoodanalysisof′bcLgenesequences、ThecuITentpositioninthePot- likelihood analysis of rbcL gene sequences. The current position in the Pot­ tiaceaetiaceaeissUpportedandacloserelationshiptoEpheme'ｗｍｓｌｐｊ""/ＯＳ"川ssuggested is supported and a close relationship to
    [Show full text]
  • 2.10 Meesia Longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II
    2.10 Meesia longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II KLAUS WEDDELING, GERHARD LUDWIG & MONIKA HACHTEL, Bonn Namen: D: Langstieliges Schwanenhalsmoos, Langstieliges Meesemoos, Gestreckte Langborste E: Long-stalked Thread Moss, Long-shafted Swan Moss, F: – Systematik/Taxonomie: Bryophyta, Bryopsida, Bryidae, Splachnales, Meesiaceae. Synonyme: Amblyodon longisetus (HEDW.) P. BEAUV. Kennzeichen/Artbestimmung: Meesia longiseta ist ein 4–8 (–10) cm hohes, akrokarpes, unverzweigtes Laubmoos von grün-schwärzlicher Färbung. Die Art wächst in lockeren, weichen Rasen (Abb. 2.9). Das Stämmchen ist bis in die Spitze wurzelhaarig und im Moose Querschnitt dreikantig. Die Blättchen sind mehr oder weniger deutlich in 3 oder 6 Rei- hen angeordnet und vom Stämmchen abgespreizt. Die 2–3,5 mm langen, spitzen Blätt- chen laufen deutlich am Stämmchen herab, sind oberwärts gekielt, ganzrandig oder an der Spitze etwas gezähnt. Ihre deutlich entwickelte Rippe endet unterhalb der Blattspitze. Der Blattrand ist flach. Die Laminazellen sind rechteckig bis rhombisch und etwa 14 µm breit. Die rötlichen, gedrehten Seten der synözischen Art können über 10 cm lang wer- den. Die langbirnenförmige, aufrechte Kapsel hat einen deutlichen Hals. Bei der Spo- renreife im Juni und Juli werden die mit 36–44 µm Durchmesser recht großen Sporen frei- gesetzt. Die Chromosomenzahl ist nicht bekannt (FRITSCH 1991). Differenzierende Merkmale zu den ähnlichen Arten Meesia uliginosa und M. hexasticha sind der nicht ein- gerollte Blattrand, die kleineren Sporen und der Rippenquerschnitt mit kleinen, inneren Zellen (zusammengestellt nach CRUM & ANDERSON 1981, FRAHM 1979, LIMPRICHT 1895). Abbildungen der Art finden sich bei CRUM & ANDERSON (1981, Fig. 296, 297, S. 628, 629: Blättchen, Blattspitze, Habitus, Kapsel) und FRAHM (1979, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Aloina Obliquifolia (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) New to South America, and New Reports of Aloina in the Neotropics
    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2008, 29 (1): 75-81 © 2008 Adac. Tous droits réservés Aloina obliquifolia (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) new to South America, and new reports of Aloina in the Neotropics María J.CANO* , M. TeresaGALLEGO, Juan A. JIMÉNEZ & JuanGUERRA Departamento de Biología Vegetal (Botánica), Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain (Received 29 May 2007, accepted 2 July 2007) Abstract – Aloina obliquifolia is newly reported for South America from Ecuador and Peru. This species has been known previously only from China and Europe. In addition, A. catillum is reported new to Chile and Ecuador and A. bifrons is reported for the first time from Ecuador. The diagnostic characters, habitat preferences, illustrations and updated ranges of the treated species are included, as well as an identification key to the known species of Aloina in South America. Aloina / Pottiaceae / Distribution / South America / Neotropic Resumen – Aloina obliquifolia se cita por primera vez para Sudamérica de Ecuador y Perú. Previamente esta especie se conocía sólo de Europa y China. Además, A. catillum es novedad para Chile y Ecuador y A. bifrons para Ecuador. Se aportan datos sobre los caracteres diagnósticos, hábitat, ilustraciones y distribución de las especies tratadas, así como una clave de identificación de las especies de Aloina en Sudamérica. Aloina / Pottiaceae / Distribución / Sudamérica / Neotrópico INTRODUCTION Aloina Kindb. (Pottiaceae) is a rather widely distributed genus that usually grows on open soils and soil-covered rocks in dry places from the sea level to high, open ranges. The world revision of Delgadillo (1975) recognized 12 taxa. Gallego et al. (1998) described a new species, Aloina humilis M.T.Gallego, M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China
    J. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 82: 305- 320 (July 1997) MOSSES OF QINGHAI-TIBETAN PLATEAU, CHINA 1 2 BENITO C. TAN AND JIA Yu ABSTRACT . A total of 57 genera and 109 species of mosses are reported based on collections made from the 1995 expedition to Yushu Prefecture of Qinghai province. Didymodon gaochienii and Or­ thomitrium schofieldii are described new to science. Encalypta intermedia, Hygrohypnum po/are and Leptopterygynandrum austro-alpinum are three moss records that have not previously been reported from China. Significant range extensions . are reported for Amblyodon dealbatum, Conardia compacta, Distichium hagenii, Grimmia anodon, Leptopterygynandrum subintegrum, Oedipodium gri.ffithianum, Orthotrichum pumilum, Philonotis calcarea, Plagiobryum demissum and Pylaisiella falcata . In addition, four new synonyms are proposed with their respective accepted names placed in­ side brackets: Aloina rubripila Aziz & Vohra [ =Aloina rigida var. obliquifolia (C. Muell.) Delgad.], Barbu/a anserino-capitata X.-J. Li [=Didymodonjohansenii (Williams) Zand.], Barbu/a longicosta­ ta X-J. Li [=Didymodon constrictus var. jlexicaulis (Chen) Saito] and Tortu/a longimucronata X.-J. Li [=Syntrichia ruralis (Hedw.) Web. & Mohr]. INTRODUCTION The province of Qinghai, with an area of about 720,000 sq. km, is the fourth largest province in China. It consitutes the eastern flank of the massive Tibetan plateau. The nu­ merous mountain glaciers in the province form the headwater of many great river systems in China and Indochina, such as Yellow River, Yangtze River and Mekong River. Because of its great distance from the ocean, the prevailing climate is strongly continental with in­ tense diurnal changes of daily temperature and a long winter season.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Full File
    i Kapak fotoğrafı / Cover photo 1. Polytrichum strictum by Dr. Tülay EZER 2. Sphagnum nemoreum by Dr. Nevzat BATAN 3. Chilochyphus polyanthos by Dr. Recep KARA 4. Lepidozia reptans by Aihaiti ABUDURUSULI ii ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN UNIVERSITY ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ ANATOLIAN BRYOLOGY ANADOLU BRİYOLOJİ DERGİSİ Cilt / Volume: 6 Sayı / Number: 1 Haziran / June 2020 e-ISSN: 2458-8474 ÇANKIRI 2020 iii ANATOLIAN BRYOLOGY Cilt / Volume: 6 Sayı / Number: 1 Haziran / June 2020 İmtiyaz Sahibi = Grantee Yazı İşleri Müdürü = Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Hasan AYRANCI Dr. Serhat URSAVAŞ Rektör = Rector Yayın İdare Merkezi = Publication Administration Center Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi, Orman Mühendisliği Bölümü, Yeni Mah. Bademlik Cad. 18200 Çankırı / TÜRKİYE Tel.: +90 376 212 27 57 / 3261; Faks: +90 376 213 6983 E-posta: [email protected], [email protected] İnternet sitesi = Website: http://dergipark.gov.tr/anatolianbryology Editör = Editor-in Chief Editör = Editör Dr. Serhat URSAVAŞ Dr. Tamer KEÇELİ (TÜRKİYE) (TÜRKİYE) Dr. Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ (SERBIA) Yayın Kurulu = Editorial Board Dr. Bernard GOFFINET University of Connecticut USA Dr. Gökhan ABAY University of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan TÜRKİYE Dr. Güray UYAR Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University TÜRKİYE Dr. Joan SİLVA State University of Paraíba BRAZIL Dr. Rayna NATCHEVA Bulgarian Academy of Sciences BULGARIA Dr. Ryszard OCHYRA Polish Academy of Sciences POLAND Dr. Turan ÖZDEMİR Karadeniz Teknik University TÜRKİYE Dr. William R. BUCK New York Botanical Garden USA Dil Editörü = Language Editor Dr. Arda ÖZEN Dr. Üstüner BİRBEN Sekretarya = Secretary Research Assistant: Simge ÇİZGEN iv ANATOLIAN BRYOLOGY Danışma Kurulu = Advisory Board Dr. Adnan ERDAĞ Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi TÜRKİYE Dr. Barbaros ÇETİN Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi TÜRKİYE Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn
    Hikobial3：645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ ４ ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
    [Show full text]
  • Annales Botanici Fennici 36: 265-269
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 265–269 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 14 December 1999 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1999 Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LXVII. Amphidium (Rhabdoweisiaceae, Musci) Daniel H. Norris & Timo Koponen Norris, D. H. & Koponen, T., Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Systematic Biology, P.O. Box 7, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Received 18 August 1999, accepted 1 November 1999 Norris, D. H. & Koponen, T. 1999: Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LXVII. Amphidium (Rhabdoweisiaceae, Musci). — Ann. Bot. Fennici 36: 265–269. Amphidium tortuosum (Hornsch.) Cufod. is the only species of the family Rhabdowei- siaceae occurring in Western Melanesia and New Guinea. Both collections came from cliff walls, one of them was in an open grassland area and the other in closed montane rainforest. The placement of Amphidium Schimp. in the neighbourhood of Dicranaceae and in the family Rhabdoweisiaceae instead of Orthotrichaceae is based on the pres- ence of epigametophytic plants in Amphidium, which are unknown in the Orthotrichaceae, on the rhizoid topography similar to Dicranaceae and different from that in Orthotricha- ceae, the pattern of papillosity of leaf cells, and on recent evidence from nucleotide sequences. Key words: Amphidium, Papua New Guinea, rhizoid topography, systematics, taxonomy, West Irian INTRODUCTION et al. (1999). Our studies are mainly based on the collections of Koponen and Norris from the Huon This paper belongs to a series dealing with the Peninsula, Papua New Guinea (H). Amphidium bryophyte flora of Western Melanesia, which in- tortuosum was collected twice during Koponen- cludes West Irian, Papua New Guinea and the Norris mission and was previously reported there- Solomon Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, Electronic Version 11-Mar-00
    Catalog of the Colorado Flora: a Biodiversity Baseline Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, electronic version 11-Mar-00 Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium Bruch & Schimper, 1853 Amblystegium serpens (Hedwig) Bruch & Schimper var. juratzkanum (Schimper) Rau & Hervey WEBER73B. Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimper. Calliergon (Sullivant) Kindberg, 1894 Calliergon cordifolium (Hedwig) Kindberg WEBER73B; HERMA76. Calliergon giganteum (Schimper) Kindberg Larimer Co.: Pingree Park, 2960 msm, 25 Sept. 1980, [Rolston 80114), !Hermann. Calliergon megalophyllum Mikutowicz COLO specimen so reported is C. richardsonii, fide Crum. Calliergon richardsonii (Mitten) Kindberg WEBER73B. Campyliadelphus (Lindberg) Chopra, 1975 KANDA75 Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Bridel) Kanda HEDEN97. Campylium chrysophyllum (Bridel) J. Lange. WEBER63; WEBER73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum chrysophyllum Bridel. HEDEN97. Campyliadelphus stellatus (Hedwig) Kanda KANDA75. Campylium stellatum (Hedwig) C. Jensen. WEBER73B. Hypnum stellatum Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum Fleischer, 1914 HEDEN97 Campylophyllum halleri (Hedwig) Fleischer HEDEN97. Nova Guinea 12, Bot. 2:123.1914. Campylium halleri (Hedwig) Lindberg. WEBER73B; HERMA76. Hypnum halleri Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum hispidulum (Bridel) Hedenäs HEDEN97. Campylium hispidulum (Bridel) Mitten. WEBER63,73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum hispidulum Bridel. HEDEN97. Cratoneuron (Sullivant) Spruce, 1867 OCHYR89 Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedwig) Spruce WEBER73B. Drepanocladus (C. Müller) Roth, 1899 HEDEN97 Nomen conserv. Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedwig) Warnstorf WEBER73B.
    [Show full text]